It is a great wonder full journey of listening the lecture... which bring ecstasy nsubline feelings.... the greatest professor of the 🌎!!! Shradhyajukto pronam naben aapni(Prof. Arindam Chakraboty ) 🙏🏻🙏🏻💥💥
what a lecture! he made tap in the hidden and deeper aspects of existence! this was just way too awesome! i can only imagine how interesting his classes must be!
That was really a blessing from the middle one who in Her infinite grace gave me the connection to this lecture. I believe in Shakthi upasana and the more I listen to Vedanta talks and talks on Kashmir Shaivism my belief in Shaktham as the liberating force gets deeper and deeper. Again after hearing this talk I feel liberation is not the end the process in the middle is actually the Shakthi of liberation. What we experience in the process is greater than the end result. Now the phrase 'God's nama is greater than God himself' makes perfect sense. Thanks to that all pervading Shakthi for Her immense avyaja grace 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽
I don't know how, but I have been eagerly waiting prof. Chakraborty on this channel for last 20 days.... Thank you sir.... Thank you so much for coming....
Sometimes these people try to say something, which common people can't understand nor follow, while going through the battle & grinding of life. These talks makes sense to rich & powerful who don't have to think for basic amenities of life.... therefore has all lots of time to think so deeply of life & philosophy
To @ Somnath Chaterji... Yes yr right sir ..without some amount of ability, interest, knowledge, intelligence, is not meant for de general mass, & common run like us🙇👌
Professor mentions about Utpaladeva's Shivastostravali (Hymns to Shiva). Coincidentally, Lakshmanjoo Academy has just started their free weekly Saturday 11am Eastern one hour sessions on this commentary by Swami Lakshmanjoo, mentioned in this talk. I am loving it and wanted to share the reader to go to their website and sign up. It brings Kashmir Shaivism to life in a pure devotional way and S. Lakshmanjoo provides sufficient background in his commentary for even folks new to KS to appreciate it's depth. 🙏
On the thinkers problem of incessant, constant and perhaps obsessive thinking..🤔. Goodness knows this is my predicament, for better or for worse, I am addicTED to thinking. Thoughts are like oxygen for my mind. I can't live without thinking, analysing,dissecting, philosophising and then, starting all over again looking for another angle to view it from in a never ending cycle. I'm a frickin thought junkie. Thank you both, professor Arindam C and my favourite Swami Sarvapriyananda for a never ending supply of thought provocations.
Obsessive, incessant 'Sunnya' intervals also needed, prana m.kosha: draw deep long Breaths of prana shakti heal us, balance ⚖️ our entire being as2 who we really are 🙇 🕉 🙏
Excellent. Very deep from start to finish. Min 17.7 : possibility of a feminist philosophy that emphasizes against the dominant western individualism. (Not against "patriarchy", but against individualism), where the "I", (which is a fiction), is "cut off" from the "totality". " The individual is not what comes first, but the "relationship" (eg with his mother). Although she also says: "there are very few feminists who actually say this today." But you could engage with this need for change in our metafhysical view.
Exelente. Muy profundo de principio a fin Min 17.7 : posibilidad de una filosofía feminista que enfatiza en contra del individualismo occidental dominante. (No en contra del "patriarcado", sino en contra del individualismo), en donde el "yo", (que es una ficción), es "cortado" de la "totalidad". " El individuo no es lo que viene primero, sinó la "relación" (por ej. con su madre). Aunque también dice: "hay muy pocas feministas que en realidad, hoy digan esto". Pero podrían comprometerse con esta necesidad de cambio en nuestra visión metafísica.
112 techniques of meditation by Shivji being explained to his consort Parvati. This too is delivered and commentators on by Osho. These techniques of which I believe this one being referred to is the first one in this series of 112. They will bring one to the ultimate supreme reality of which ofcourse Lord Shankar is wondrous and famously known for 🙏
If the relationship is real, then it would be permanent. It requires two for relationship, so duality would be permanent. If duality is permanent then moksha is impossible. Mind feeds on complexity so agree it will be a good exercise to try to keep the mind occupied away from dissolution.
@@anatomistnoelectrons9414 I did not say moksha is not possible for dualist. Lord can give the knowledge to transcend duality. I said if duality is permanent then it cannot be transcended by anyone, whatever philosophy one may follow.
@@KriB510 at around 1:25 he says Shankara dismisses relationship as unreal but utpaladeva considers relationship as real. Maharaj in his Advaitic response gave the dream example which in one stroke dismisses multiplicity (including relationships) and establishes oneness. As soon as conviction of unreality of experience is established vairagya comes effortlessly, there will be no grasping of objects nor the relationship.
@@arjunrathore8950 Yes, if duality is permanent, mukti/moksha is defined as liberation from the cycle of birth/death and be in the presence of the Lord eternally. You must have fixed on the non-dual definition of moksha of becoming God yourself.
... I cud Understand it somewhat better using a combined word ' has Connection... Connected to / thru' / with /...in between in de middle '.... than just using de phrase ' has relationship with /to/thru ....' Thnx🙇
Dear Prof. Chakrabarti: Please correct me if I am wrong here in my understanding: What we observe as contact is the togetherness of 2 waves. Different waves may have different qualities even though they arise from the same ocean. Qualities are never static, qualities are changeable, and something which is changeable must be in motion, and must be in contact all the time. In reality, there are no qualities at all, what we call qualities is the effect of the vibration. To differentiate between substance and quality we need to give up causality, time, and space. An iron ball in water will dissolve in water and will be no more over time. The water will retain some of its qualities only if we can see those qualities we may say the iron ball is still there just the form has changed.
The middle in this case is not something that exists because it is a place. And therefore it is not relevant whether it can be divided or needs to be again and again to define where relation exists between what otherwise does. And it is even less relevant possibly?? if it can be expanded, which I think might be a favourite pastime.
⬆️ to @ Helen Murray... this is a broad talk on de Bhairav Vigyana Tantra- superior science of esotoric ( yoga ) in Kashmiri Shaivism- between de Shiva principle as Bhairav 'n Shakti (Knowledge combined with Devotion = gyana mishr bhakti) ... am i right...?
...too subtle 4 ordinary minds 2grasp..unless undergoing that line of discipline..Very Subtle 'n sublime. no such concrete tangible middle aspect inbetween ! ...am i right?
Please pardon the thought that occurred to me while listening to this erudite man on delight in another person’s delight about an age old song of a raj Kapoor film . Begani shadi me Abdul deewana , aise manmojiko mushkil he samjhana !
सोऽहं तेंही अस्तवलें | जेथ सांगतेंचि सांगणें जालें | द्रष्टत्वेंसी गेलें | दृश्य जेथ ॥ ५४२ ॥ आतां बिंबा आणि प्रतिबिंबा- | माजीं कैंची हें म्हणों नये प्रभा ? | जऱ्ही कैसेनि हे लाभा | जायेचि ना ॥ ५४३ ॥ कां घ्राणा फुला दोहीं | द्रुती असे जे माझारिलां ठायीं | ते न दिसे तरी नाहीं | ऐसें बोलों नये ॥ ५४४ ॥ तैसें द्रष्टा दृश्य हें जाये | मग कोण म्हणे काय आहे | हेंचि अनुभवें तेंचि पाहें | रूप तया ॥ ५४५ ॥
In contrast to westerns, who also lie,but not about their traditions, Indian philosophers lie about their traditions, thousand years old Abhinava or Bhartrahari, so as make it sterile, in contrast to incremental progress. Professor Arindam's defence of non-dualism is much worse than their forbears. His sambanda, psychology of emotions, metaphysics of politics etc are without support from science. He should tell us what light his views will get from cognitive science. A.Kanthamani
I am sorry for your professor. You are not even realizing what you are saying. Some day you might read this comment and that possibility is high,would you realise that you have already conned yourself. You have nothing to offer. If I remove/ drop all examples physically from your talk what would be left is noise.
What do you think is true then? Also, are you realizing what is he saying? I'd appreciate if you could help me, making me realise wrong in what he said?
@@shubhanshuojha1139 Understanding, realisation self realisation about unknown is not possible and does not exist. What humans deal with is all known. It is a label a topic which is being discussed based on what other topics or labels we know. Image and sound are same words and serve same purposes. Sound gives image Image is given label ( that is sound). It is not possible for humans to brake this circle or vice versa. A fish has no way to know that she is swimming in the water and certainly has no way to realize that it needs plenty of water to swim. Same way thought is used by humans to maintain an identity ( culture principles logic etc etc ) to function in this world as it appears before them but like water thought is not concerned about the welfare of the thinking man like water knows that it is permanent as it's constituted elements and as water as well. Like water air and other elements of the nature thought is faciasist & is only interested in its status quo.
The greatest professor in the universe!!!!!!
I feel blessed to have heard this talk. Salutations to Professor Chakrabarti and Swami Sarvapriyananda and everyone of Vedanta Ny
Khub valo.
It is a great wonder full journey of listening the lecture... which bring ecstasy nsubline feelings.... the greatest professor of the 🌎!!! Shradhyajukto pronam naben aapni(Prof. Arindam Chakraboty ) 🙏🏻🙏🏻💥💥
what a lecture! he made tap in the hidden and deeper aspects of existence! this was just way too awesome! i can only imagine how interesting his classes must be!
Jai ShriThakur 🙏🏻
Pranam Professor Arundam Chakravarti 🙏🏻
Thank you Vedanta New York for sharing this video 🌹
That was really a blessing from the middle one who in Her infinite grace gave me the connection to this lecture. I believe in Shakthi upasana and the more I listen to Vedanta talks and talks on Kashmir Shaivism my belief in Shaktham as the liberating force gets deeper and deeper. Again after hearing this talk I feel liberation is not the end the process in the middle is actually the Shakthi of liberation. What we experience in the process is greater than the end result. Now the phrase 'God's nama is greater than God himself' makes perfect sense. Thanks to that all pervading Shakthi for Her immense avyaja grace 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽
I don't know how, but I have been eagerly waiting prof. Chakraborty on this channel for last 20 days.... Thank you sir.... Thank you so much for coming....
"I am other to other" - very nice statement.
Soooo wonderful, intelligentsia beyond limits.., lucky to listen them in my life time..... thanks and pranam to you......sir 🙏🙏
Sometimes these people try to say something, which common people can't understand nor follow, while going through the battle & grinding of life. These talks makes sense to rich & powerful who don't have to think for basic amenities of life.... therefore has all lots of time to think so deeply of life & philosophy
Sir, pls help people who don't have basic amenities of life, ask others to do the same and come & listen to him. That's what we do.
To @ Somnath Chaterji... Yes yr right sir ..without some amount of ability, interest, knowledge, intelligence, is not meant for de general mass, & common run like us🙇👌
@@sreeladevi1780 unfortunately everyone claims to be working for the larger masses & up-liftment of the poor & downtrodden....
Wonderful relationships this talk embodies appear before our eyes and ears like a resplendent sky.
Professor mentions about Utpaladeva's Shivastostravali (Hymns to Shiva). Coincidentally, Lakshmanjoo Academy has just started their free weekly Saturday 11am Eastern one hour sessions on this commentary by Swami Lakshmanjoo, mentioned in this talk. I am loving it and wanted to share the reader to go to their website and sign up. It brings Kashmir Shaivism to life in a pure devotional way and S. Lakshmanjoo provides sufficient background in his commentary for even folks new to KS to appreciate it's depth. 🙏
Thank you 🙏🙏
Just visited the website.
Respected sir. Wonderful
Dr. Chakrabarti you are so cool!!
On the thinkers problem of incessant, constant and perhaps obsessive thinking..🤔.
Goodness knows this is my predicament, for better or for worse, I am addicTED to thinking.
Thoughts are like oxygen for my mind. I can't live without thinking, analysing,dissecting, philosophising and then, starting all over again looking for another angle to view it from in a never ending cycle.
I'm a frickin thought junkie.
Thank you both, professor Arindam C and my favourite Swami Sarvapriyananda for a never ending supply of thought provocations.
Obsessive, incessant 'Sunnya' intervals also needed, prana m.kosha: draw deep long Breaths of prana shakti heal us, balance ⚖️ our entire being as2 who we really are 🙇 🕉 🙏
To...⬆️ @Terence David
@@sreeladevi1780 thank u 🙏🏼
It is Sat Chit Anand, EXISTENCE CONSCIOUSNESS BLISS
What a wise and loveable man!
Great and enriching talkon Attaining relations, Thanks to Prof Arindam Chakrabarti.👏👏🙏🏽
Please invite him again to enrich us with another talk🙏
Feel blessed to be exposed to such wonderful, illuminating discourse!🙏🙏🙏
Speechless !
Excellent.
Very deep from start to finish.
Min 17.7 : possibility of a feminist philosophy that emphasizes against the dominant western individualism. (Not against "patriarchy", but against individualism), where the "I", (which is a fiction), is "cut off" from the "totality".
" The individual is not what comes first, but the "relationship" (eg with his mother). Although she also says: "there are very few feminists who actually say this today." But you could engage with this need for change in our metafhysical view.
Exelente.
Muy profundo de principio a fin
Min 17.7 : posibilidad de una filosofía feminista que enfatiza en contra del individualismo occidental dominante. (No en contra del "patriarcado", sino en contra del individualismo), en donde el "yo", (que es una ficción), es "cortado" de la "totalidad".
" El individuo no es lo que viene primero, sinó la "relación" (por ej. con su madre).
Aunque también dice: "hay muy pocas feministas que en realidad, hoy digan esto". Pero podrían comprometerse con esta necesidad de cambio en nuestra visión metafísica.
Very informative.. Kindly post more vedios like this..
Thanku very much
112 techniques of meditation by Shivji being explained to his consort Parvati. This too is delivered and commentators on by Osho. These techniques of which I believe this one being referred to is the first one in this series of 112. They will bring one to the ultimate supreme reality of which ofcourse Lord Shankar is wondrous and famously known for 🙏
Beautiful🌸🌿
Thanks sir
রামকৃষ্ণ,গুরু🙏
Hey can anyone recommend books in English on Indian epistemology and/or Indian hermeneutics? Thanks.
Read TARKA SANGRAHA by Annam bhatt..
Om
.................................................................................maunam!!!
Can some one please give more info about the slokas chanted by Prof. Chakrabarti ? Thanks .
I love Prof. Chakrabarti, I wish to study under his mentorship. I want to be him! 🌞💜
Amazing lecture
Profound
Om The Secret Sky In Between,Does It Mean"Chidakash"?.Om Shanti!.
Jai Sri Ramakrishna Jai Sri Ramakrishna Jai Sri Ramakrishna Jai Sri Ramakrishna Jai Sri Ramakrishna
Hari om tat sat
If the relationship is real, then it would be permanent. It requires two for relationship, so duality would be permanent. If duality is permanent then moksha is impossible. Mind feeds on complexity so agree it will be a good exercise to try to keep the mind occupied away from dissolution.
Why do you think moksha is impossible for dualists? Do you have non-dualistic definition for moksha which doesn’t include the dualistic mukti?
@@anatomistnoelectrons9414 I did not say moksha is not possible for dualist. Lord can give the knowledge to transcend duality. I said if duality is permanent then it cannot be transcended by anyone, whatever philosophy one may follow.
@@arjunrathore8950 I thought it is the binding of the in-between that shows us all as one, and then there is actually no in-between.
@@KriB510 at around 1:25 he says Shankara dismisses relationship as unreal but utpaladeva considers relationship as real. Maharaj in his Advaitic response gave the dream example which in one stroke dismisses multiplicity (including relationships) and establishes oneness. As soon as conviction of unreality of experience is established vairagya comes effortlessly, there will be no grasping of objects nor the relationship.
@@arjunrathore8950 Yes, if duality is permanent, mukti/moksha is defined as liberation from the cycle of birth/death and be in the presence of the Lord eternally. You must have fixed on the non-dual definition of moksha of becoming God yourself.
The Other is the Non-Other❤️What an ignited mind.....Academics ka AB💥💥💥AHAM SHLOKAKRIT.... Brilliant 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
As a philosophy student - this lecture was our clarity of spirituality
Excellent and very clear!!! Thank you 🙏
🙏🏻 🙏🏻 🙏🏻
🙏🏼
Jai Sri Ramakrishna 🙏
His Bengali written books are not available now without vatkaporer vabna.
... I cud Understand it somewhat better using a combined word ' has Connection... Connected to / thru' / with /...in between in de middle '.... than just using de phrase ' has relationship with /to/thru ....' Thnx🙇
Just started....hopefully someone gives him a glass of water...💧🥛🙏
17:32 , 18:12 , 35:00
Dear Prof. Chakrabarti: Please correct me if I am wrong here in my understanding:
What we observe as contact is the togetherness of 2 waves.
Different waves may have different qualities even though they arise from the same ocean. Qualities are never static, qualities are changeable, and something which is changeable must be in motion, and must be in contact all the time. In reality, there are no qualities at all, what we call qualities is the effect of the vibration. To differentiate between substance and quality we need to give up causality, time, and space. An iron ball in water will dissolve in water and will be no more over time. The water will retain some of its qualities only if we can see those qualities we may say the iron ball is still there just the form has changed.
Whose philosophy of dance?
🙏
50:13
It's Hemmingway & not Twain.
The middle in this case is not something that exists because it is a place. And therefore it is not relevant whether it can be divided or needs to be again and again to define where relation exists between what otherwise does. And it is even less relevant possibly?? if it can be expanded, which I think might be a favourite pastime.
⬆️ to @ Helen Murray... this is a broad talk on de Bhairav Vigyana Tantra- superior science of esotoric ( yoga ) in Kashmiri Shaivism- between de Shiva principle as Bhairav 'n Shakti (Knowledge combined with Devotion = gyana mishr bhakti) ...
am i right...?
...too subtle 4 ordinary minds 2grasp..unless undergoing that line of discipline..Very Subtle 'n sublime. no such concrete tangible middle aspect inbetween ! ...am i right?
😊😊😊🌹❤
Please pardon the thought that occurred to me while listening to this erudite man on delight in another person’s delight about an age old song of a raj Kapoor film . Begani shadi me Abdul deewana , aise manmojiko mushkil he samjhana !
🌸🌺🌸🌺🌸
🌹🌹🌹🙏🙏🙏
Ok great. It may be a bit after/
सोऽहं तेंही अस्तवलें | जेथ सांगतेंचि सांगणें जालें | द्रष्टत्वेंसी गेलें | दृश्य जेथ ॥ ५४२ ॥
आतां बिंबा आणि प्रतिबिंबा- | माजीं कैंची हें म्हणों नये प्रभा ? |
जऱ्ही कैसेनि हे लाभा | जायेचि ना ॥ ५४३ ॥
कां घ्राणा फुला दोहीं | द्रुती असे जे माझारिलां ठायीं | ते न दिसे तरी नाहीं | ऐसें बोलों नये ॥ ५४४ ॥
तैसें द्रष्टा दृश्य हें जाये | मग कोण म्हणे काय आहे | हेंचि अनुभवें तेंचि पाहें | रूप तया ॥ ५४५ ॥
Dnyaneshwari?
knowledge is bondage a golden umbrical cord tied to golden womb hiranya garbha
I am hindu 🕉 Gen21.19 she gave Jesus liveing creatures 🕉 worthy of worship God lion bull man eagl worthy of worship Ezekiel shivah
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
I guess….the professor is talking about transcendental aspect of Atman whereas RKMATH followers aims at both the transcendental and immanence…
First veiwer
In contrast to westerns, who also lie,but not about their traditions, Indian philosophers lie about their traditions, thousand years old Abhinava or Bhartrahari, so as make it sterile, in contrast to incremental progress. Professor Arindam's defence of non-dualism is much worse than their forbears. His sambanda, psychology of emotions, metaphysics of politics etc are without support from science. He should tell us what light his views will get from cognitive science.
A.Kanthamani
Life wasted. So near yet so far. Even after writing so much even after talking so much yet not gained anything. What a loss. Sorrow of mankind.
Onar gola boshe ache,, na oromi
Aaj kisko bewkoof bana rahe ho Mr chaterjee??
I am sorry for your professor. You are not even realizing what you are saying. Some day you might read this comment and that possibility is high,would you realise that you have already conned yourself.
You have nothing to offer. If I remove/ drop all examples physically from your talk what would be left is noise.
What do you think is true then?
Also, are you realizing what is he saying? I'd appreciate if you could help me, making me realise wrong in what he said?
@@shubhanshuojha1139 Understanding, realisation self realisation about unknown is not possible and does not exist. What humans deal with is all known.
It is a label a topic which is being discussed based on what other topics or labels we know.
Image and sound are same words and serve same purposes.
Sound gives image
Image is given label ( that is sound).
It is not possible for humans to brake this circle or vice versa.
A fish has no way to know that she is swimming in the water and certainly has no way to realize that it needs plenty of water to swim.
Same way thought is used by humans to maintain an identity ( culture principles logic etc etc ) to function in this world as it appears before them but like water thought is not concerned about the welfare of the thinking man like water knows that it is permanent as it's constituted elements and as water as well.
Like water air and other elements of the nature thought is faciasist & is only interested in its status quo.
@@KuldeepPandita-kn9bx read wittgenstein
@@surjamitbhattacharjee1645 You wrote READ. If it is not read then tell me what is it.?
As a philosophy student - this lecture was our clarity of spirituality
🙏