Great video. In my opinion, LCS is way better. Remember, you're looking at something in its barebones with no 8k skydomes, ground fog, or all the other bells and whistles of pure. LCS colors are more accurate (despite looking a bit more contrast-y). Check the tarmac detail in the first half of the video in Mt. Panorama. You can see the different tarmac colors more clearly with LCS than the other gamma-based pp filters. At night, it's even more evident. Every other pp filter, except the LCS-based one has this white tint that I personally spend hours trying to get off my screen as much as I can with every update of a gamma-based pp filter. LCS doesn't replace Pure. It'll make it better. More accurate colors, no overblown lighting especially at night, and just more superior shading for AC. Currently, I'm sticking with LCS until Peter drops an LCS-based Pure version
(PureLife) LCS is my default - track surface, colours, shadows, foliage closer to reality, there's a sharpness.crispness to object that I like (normally some softening actually closer to our eyes/camera views. I'll only swtich back for beautiful clouds or if I have mod with an issue.
@@monyx1101 same thing for me. I actually haven't switched back to gamma in a while. Pure Life LCS will be my go to until Peter does his magic. I hope he fully decides to integrate it to Pure.
Good video 👏I think LCS has more accurate shadows over Pure, as well as better able to show detail from far away. Pure still has the beatifical car reflections and skydomes and shadows still look great. At this point though I feel like I am looking over it with a fine-tooth comb. Pure wins still
yeah bang on, it's nit-picking, although you have to get a good (paid) ppf like C13AEGIS to compete. For night LCS is superior for headlight illumincation with realistic fall-off, all the Pure seem to compensate for the defficiencies and light sources are over-bright.
@@monyx1101you can tune pure , plus Natural mod is mazing as well , using LCS for those micro advantages (not really ) and loosing all the controls of Pure over light and weather 😂 , Sky domes alone lol , road fog , proper color etc No thank you Illija but I’ll pass , Peter got this 🎉
C13 and Pure EVO looks like real live LCS I can’t seem to find a reason to use it , I can see any difference besides way to warm of colors and saturation . Still Like Pure way better . I tried it in VR on my rig and LOLllled , switched back to Natural mod immediately. Is there a way to adjust lighting like in pure for LCD?
I'm using a 4K 50" HDR display, so different application - altho I miss skydomes, I prefer PureLIFE LCS with C13 a close second. If anything LCS is a bit cool in colour temp - more red in in the tarmac on C13. LCS foliage greens a bit bright/over saturated compared to C13. I used to always use PureEye-HDR but compared to these it looks soft and way too warm. The shadows in LCS are slightly darker, I think more realistic given this was ~8am.
@@monyx1101 I fine tune everything in Pure to my eye , looks amazing , LCS looks like iRacing maybe It’ll get better but without Pute it’s a no brainer
@@monyx1101 oh really? I thought pure wasn’t going to have support for LCS for a while. I do have pure 2.7.1. Wow I can’t wait to mess with this when I get home then 😀. I’m guessing it’s just partial support? Or do all the weather effects acctually work?
Great video. In my opinion, LCS is way better. Remember, you're looking at something in its barebones with no 8k skydomes, ground fog, or all the other bells and whistles of pure. LCS colors are more accurate (despite looking a bit more contrast-y). Check the tarmac detail in the first half of the video in Mt. Panorama. You can see the different tarmac colors more clearly with LCS than the other gamma-based pp filters. At night, it's even more evident. Every other pp filter, except the LCS-based one has this white tint that I personally spend hours trying to get off my screen as much as I can with every update of a gamma-based pp filter.
LCS doesn't replace Pure. It'll make it better. More accurate colors, no overblown lighting especially at night, and just more superior shading for AC. Currently, I'm sticking with LCS until Peter drops an LCS-based Pure version
(PureLife) LCS is my default - track surface, colours, shadows, foliage closer to reality, there's a sharpness.crispness to object that I like (normally some softening actually closer to our eyes/camera views. I'll only swtich back for beautiful clouds or if I have mod with an issue.
@@monyx1101 same thing for me. I actually haven't switched back to gamma in a while. Pure Life LCS will be my go to until Peter does his magic. I hope he fully decides to integrate it to Pure.
Good video 👏I think LCS has more accurate shadows over Pure, as well as better able to show detail from far away. Pure still has the beatifical car reflections and skydomes and shadows still look great.
At this point though I feel like I am looking over it with a fine-tooth comb. Pure wins still
yeah bang on, it's nit-picking, although you have to get a good (paid) ppf like C13AEGIS to compete. For night LCS is superior for headlight illumincation with realistic fall-off, all the Pure seem to compensate for the defficiencies and light sources are over-bright.
10000%
@@monyx1101you can tune pure , plus Natural mod is mazing as well , using LCS for those micro advantages (not really ) and loosing all the controls of Pure over light and weather 😂 , Sky domes alone lol , road fog , proper color etc No thank you Illija but I’ll pass , Peter got this 🎉
@@MaksAMD Yup all true. Trade-off is too big for a nice headlight fall-off
C13 and Pure EVO looks like real live LCS I can’t seem to find a reason to use it , I can see any difference besides way to warm of colors and saturation . Still Like Pure way better . I tried it in VR on my rig and LOLllled , switched back to Natural mod immediately. Is there a way to adjust lighting like in pure for LCD?
I'm using a 4K 50" HDR display, so different application - altho I miss skydomes, I prefer PureLIFE LCS with C13 a close second. If anything LCS is a bit cool in colour temp - more red in in the tarmac on C13. LCS foliage greens a bit bright/over saturated compared to C13. I used to always use PureEye-HDR but compared to these it looks soft and way too warm. The shadows in LCS are slightly darker, I think more realistic given this was ~8am.
@@monyx1101 I fine tune everything in Pure to my eye , looks amazing , LCS looks like iRacing maybe It’ll get better but without Pute it’s a no brainer
What map?
Bathurst Mt Panorama ACC ver converted by Reboot team, I also added 3D trees from overtake.gg
@@monyx1101 thanks man!
LCS based pure is gonna be the stuff. For now though imma stick with C13 which is in my opinion the best PP filter out there (for non LCS ofc)
Pure 0.271 now supports LCS so you can have skydomes with superior shading.
@@monyx1101 oh really? I thought pure wasn’t going to have support for LCS for a while. I do have pure 2.7.1. Wow I can’t wait to mess with this when I get home then 😀. I’m guessing it’s just partial support? Or do all the weather effects acctually work?
@@copelandtaylor8851 limited to daylight only atm