_all is great of __but at formulla not_ exist_ for atom formulla is _the atom is a generator_ motor ellectric and with stator is nucleus and rotor is ellectronic movie in around nucleus and formulla must respect lex maxwell rotE=_dB/dt+rot(v*B) and rotH=J+dD/dt and HrotE--Erot= =div(H*E) and this formlla must calculated at relativist speed_fast for with lex lorentz_ einstein __ __archaicxn lord
@@123demidog _sir the this callcul the must efectued for studyng of condition on equilibrium beetwen inter force from inside atom the force of strong nuclear the force of ellectromagnetyc the force of gravity and other force from inside atom_very very thank you very much__the must know the atom is in reality a little electric motor or generator because he not consuming energy conventional for the this movie from him _ __archaicxn lord
I used to think I disliked chemistry because it's "difficult", but the person breaking down the information in this video makes me enjoy it. wow. thanks!
College professors seem to be much better at conveying complicated concepts in simple terms than high school teachers in my experience. The high school teachers often just omit stuff that is important for actually understanding the topic. But i will say the best history teacher i ever had was in high school
@@palgunk5906 unfortunately there are several of those, notice many people post how visual videos are more effective than reading or hearing the professor talk
I don't think most people understand how absolutely amazing this discovery is... we're in a pixelated and vibrating universe the pixels (atoms) all vibrate at different frequencies...taking commands from the universal vibrating source.
@@vindican462 find an atom, cut it in half, throw it at your nemesis while running as fast as you can in opposite direction while laughing like a madman. Last part is optional but highly recomended.
Just sitting here reading a science book (for fun) that is beyond my comprehension. In looking up a few terms, I came across your absolutely wonderful video! So well produced, captivating and a perfect pace for the ADHD mind. I am excited to keep watching. Thanks for the great work!
I'm trying to help my children get a better understanding of what an atom is. This was the best breakdown of an atom I've ever seen. Wish I saw this when I took Chemistry class.
You're thorough, you're crystal clear. You're conscientious even with the right pronunciation of foreign names - which is fantastic, you're simply great! Carry on like this👍
I am a teacher of chemistry and I absolutely love the way you have put the video together. My students will like the animation, the simplified way you have described terms and still managing to convey the technical definitions. Well done!
I love the way you use the phrase "building blocks of chemistry" rather than the way I learned back in the 1950's "building blocks of matter". Yours is way more accurate. Teaching is the process of passing knowledge on in a way that is understandable. If the student doesn't understand it, it's not teaching, just babbling.
Not I. But I guess a Stay Home or we'll flatten your tires State Governor mandate is a loosely enforced quarantine in itself. I am here simply to learn about the foundations of the Tim Horton breakfast and coffee I just consumed and of the furball deadly clawed predator that presently lays in my lap. Today makes my first visitation to understanding the Atom in over 40 years (since high school science class). Best brunch time ever, thanks to Stated Clearly.
I'am 8th grade in Turkey and our 4th unit is about atoms. You made them very simple to understand and I'm learning the translation of the unit. So thank you so much for this great video.
Just wanted to say, I really appreciate your evolution series. It doesn't at all talk down to people who may disagree with you, and that's all too rare nowadays.
I am an elementary school teacher, and I wish that all teachers were able to explain things this clearly and simply for people who want to learn. I sometimes even fail at doing this, complicating explanations, which causes students to either be bored, or fail to understand altogether. This is stated very clearly. 👍🏼
My; brother, you’re brilliant. Like, so brilliant, I’m willing to sound like an idiot to say it haha. You broke it down, in such a way, that I can now explain definitively, the difference between elements and atoms, w/not a confusing textbook definition that doesn’t really answer the question, but with relevant history that makes much more since as to the difference between the two. The difference is simply a result of the original ignorance of the fact that atoms exist. Logically/naturally, we found elements first, because they are massive conglomerates of smaller identical units. In other words, the purest form of substance, but not the smallest, hence, the atom. The atom is the smallest unit of an element, that is identical to other units of that element, with respect to proton - mass ratio, but also considering the range of said ratio, given the existence of isotopes. In any event, the amount of protons is consistent.
No, this is one of the most naive and subpar history of science videos I've seen on TH-cam. Skill in animations doesn't implicate understanding of science. This video doesn't even explain such a simple concept as Einstein's Brownian motions, instead tell us it is too mathematical to understand for people without mathematical understanding! Silly, silly, silly.
Amazing video. I didn't expect it to go into as much detail and history as it did, but that was a great trip from the beginning ideas of atoms to the modern proof of their existence, summed up very well in only 12 minutes
I am astonished at how you managed to balance breadth and depth, and include very modern developments. Pedagogical genius. Oh, and by the way, your pronunciation of "Jean Perrin" was perfect too (I am a native French speaker)!
While you technically can't see single individual atoms, you can actually see single sheets of atoms, in 2D Materials such as Graphene, MoS2, etc. They have a slight opacity in the visible spectrum even with one layer! That's pretty cool to be able to see. Thanks for the cool video!
I loved how you cleared some Myths on Scientists and their achievements.First,How you mentioned in the small box about the Indian Philosopher Kanada and gave him credit which many eurocentric people don't.Second,Giving credit to the Arab Chemist.Fourth,Giving credit to Antoine's wife also.And also how you showed Einstein to be Younger in 1905.As,most people have set a picture of Einstein in their minds looking old with white uncombed hair.Amazing video.This helped me a lot!
I think he focused more on how we know what they are and that they exist, hence the "lack of profundity". Also, as he said, there are more videos on this topic coming soon.
Thank You so much !! I am a 8th grade student taking high school classes and this really helped all the other videos talk too fast or don't go in depth I am definitely watching the whole animation series for chemistry. You gained a new sub
THANK YOU!!!!!! MY 3rd grade son was overwhelmed and bored to tears by his science book explaining these things. This and your next episode basically covered EVERYTHING in the whole chapter and he liked it AND understood! It has been TOOOO long since you have added to this category! We would love a video "what is chemistry and physic"? or something like that, which explains what chemistry and physics are (the studies of matter and energy) and then clearly explain such things as properties, matter, volume, displacement, mass, density, buoyancy, malleability, ductility, and luster. Another video about what makes things solid, amorphous solids, liquid, or gas, and freezing points, melting points, condensation points, and viscosity would THOROUGHLY save my son's first 8 weeks of school. Looking forward into his book I'm already stressed about what is coming next: Newton's 1st, 2nd, and 3rd laws... dynamics of motion, forms of energy, sound waves, frequencies, and light-waves, color spectrum, and then magnetism?! And he is supposed to understand this all from a TEXTBOOK and boring fill in the blank worksheets?! Stated Clearly please save us!!
ATOM. Atom = electron (active) + proton (passive). In simple atom, 99.9% of the space is empty, because the distance between electron and proton is 10^-10 m. But if one electron tied two protons, then the distance is 10^15 m. (closer to each other by as much as five orders of magnitude). The more complex the atom, the shorter the distance and its outer space tends to zero, while the inner field increases and becomes nuclear. All interactions (EM, nuclear, weak) are the result of the connection between electrons and protons and depend on the distance (and conditions) of interaction. These interactions obey Pauli's law: "There can be only one electron in an atom: simple or complex."
This video is AH-MAZING! Thank you SO much for making it! I was just introduced to chemistry and atoms today for an online anatomy and physiology class. The text was really difficult to grasp on it's own so I went to Google to hunt down something more dynamic that could explain the concepts better. WOW! Your video made my day and did the subject justice!!!
I think it's an unfair portrayal of democritus and his theory. Democritus and his followers had many reasons for believing that reality was made from individual bits of stuff. In fact democritus was one of the first to take a non-teleological and mostly non-mystical view of the world. All things had natural laws and cause which ruled over interactions. An especially ignorant comment about Democritus is that infinity made him feel uncomfortable. Democrituss was one of the few of his time that embraced the infinite and the total lack of anything at all. The few that accepted the idea that time stretched into the past infinitely! His theory of atoms DEPENDS on infinity being a rigorous thing. One of the most compelling arguments the Atomists had in favour of the atoms was the idea that since the universe has always existed and that things seem to be in constant decay(entropy, a mountain's rock wears down overtime) that like the particles of sand on a beach there must be a point at which things stop decaying over time otherwise there would nothing. This is why Democritus happily proclaims "nothing but atoms and the void".
Stated Clearly, you have given my son and i such an in depth understanding of science. A beautiful and informative approach ! I look forward to everything you put out and will definitely contribute and donate more.
Hello Mr. Romero's class!! (I know im not the only one who scrolls through the comments 😏) I cant believe they actually have a picture of a real atom this year, not just a scan. Science is so cool! Definitely add the picture of the atom to your next video. Thanks so much for the content.
This is very useful and informative. Since I used to feel sleepy in my online class and lazy to open a one-hour recording video, I decided to just watch a lecture on TH-cam.
thats very true! and also, as Pluviophile stated, legos are made of atoms. so its a like a spiral getting smaller with each revolution .... legos...atoms....legos...atoms... until infinity
THAT WAS ACTUALLY pretty awesome! I'm an adult taking grade 9 science for further education and you made the historical standpoint a lot more fun and pretty cool to know. I can't believe he guessed what the atoms looked like a thousand year before we had the technology. Just all these scientists and their ability to question and find answers is really incredible.
I am in love with this video, the way you broke it down make it so easy to understand. This video answer all the questions that I had on this matter ( pun intended). Thank you so much, I’m a keep watching this over and over again.
no, there IS a bottom line you can split atoms into quarks but you can't "split" thee quarks. you just can't, even if you have a LHC in your backyard. or maybe, if quarks are complexes of strings...
Democritus's argument for the existence atoms didn't have anything to do with matter's infinite divisability. It was a response to the argument ex nihilo nihil fit by Parmenides. Parmenides in his book physics argued that nothing comes from nothing, thus change is merely illusory. Democritus argued that the conclusion (change is merely illusory) doesn't follow from the premise (ex nihilo nihil fit) if the cosmos is made of indivisible units. The changes (growth, decay, etc...) that occur in nature are merely the rearranging of these indivisible units.
Correct assessment. As you can see, these debates were philosophical and metaphysical concerning the nature of the universe, proposed without any collectible data. No empirical method. Not scientific as we define that today. They were couch musings of classical philosophers purported as scientists or naturalists. Thought experiments without even mathematics to back them up. His prophetic idea well over 2000 years ago was in fact unprovable for many many centuries. Other similar but conflicting ideas eventually fell out of favor and were ignored by later thinkers and early naturalists and chemists. In the more recent centuries observations alluded indirectly to this ancient philosophy, and the ancient unsubstantiated philosophy became a guideline in the empirical quest as tools were developed to study elemental substance. So would the science you see postulated in the presented timeline, and tools developed to prove what was, in reality, just a philosophical wild guess that orthodox scientists wanted to accept as true, since they were sprung from a over two thousand year school of thought in conflict with an alternate thought... Would the modern science exist without the prophetic but completely unsubstantiated leap of faith. That is why empirical thought and investigation is only one aspect of human reason. It is counterproductive to respect ONLY that form of reason to the exclusion of the other three major forms. Without these prophetic postulations, we would have had little interest in seeing the unseen atom and our empirical science may have never looked. Science is not an absolute and will not always lead to all natural truths eventually. Many empirical efforts have led to false positives for decades or centuries, that were accepted. If false positives are taken as final truth, they will never be exposed as errors. Always doubt and always question.
Nothing comes from nothing. I agree with this so how did the universe come to be. There was nothing at first so where the energy come from to cause a bang
@@rudy6222 What makes you think there was nothing before the big bang? Phycists don't know what happened because their equations can't tell them what happened early in the big bang. Their equations can't tell them because we don't know what the fundamental particles do at that level of heat. Anyways, phycists have empirical evidence of matter coming from nonmatter.
@Pluviophile : "I think they're trying to say the opposite. "Nothing comes from nothing." Which means, if anything's there then it's origins must have been something rather than nothing. And if the origins were "nothing", then there shouldn't have been anything. Hence, nothing comes from nothing. There must have been something before big bang which led to the formation of universe. " ==Pretty much nobody argues that something comes from nothing. The only time I have heard that argument is from creationists making a straw man arguments against the Big Bang or Lawrence Krauss. The Big Bang theory makes no such claim. Creationists know that church goers aren't science savvy and are unlikely to pick up a book about the subject and so, creationists give themselves the freedom to lie about it. When you read Lawrence Krauss's book, "A universe from nothing", he pretty much explains it in the first chapter. At one point in time, vacuum was considered a "nothing". Empty space was considered a "nothing". There is an experiment that suggests that particle pairs pop into existence and cancel each other out quickly, in other words, matter forms from "nothing". Or stated in another way, the universe / empty space is not a true nothing. It is some sort of stuff with its own properties. 100 years ago, it was called a "nothing". "There must have been something before big bang which led to the formation of universe." ==That's what human logic leads us to and no scientist, not even Krauss, is claiming that the universe came from nothing. The only people, making that claim are creationists.
Thank you for all of your videos, they are "Stated Clearly" enough for me to introduce my mother and nephews to evolution and science in general with easy to understand visuals.
Just a little bit of semantics but you can’t reverse a chemical reaction as you stated. It would take a separate new reaction to convert the compounds back to original form.
Teacher: hi Me: bye Student: ohhhhhhhh Teacher: get aut of klass Me: no Student:ohhhhhhhh Teacher: get aut of school My parents: wellcome to home Me: rip My friends: reast in piece
Thanks, I have a note in the video description about this. A lot of western sources say he was Arabic but apparently it's not true, or at least it likely not true.
Thank you so much for the response. I am really impressed that you care so much about the accuracy of your talks. Sure! you are right. It is a matter of dispute. Anyway I doubt most people in the west would know the differences between Arabs and Persians! ;) Best, And keep up doing a great job!
Here is the next animation of the series: th-cam.com/video/ooWfzpUIoNM/w-d-xo.html
_all is great of __but at formulla not_ exist_ for atom formulla is _the atom is a generator_ motor ellectric and with stator is nucleus and rotor is ellectronic movie in around nucleus and formulla must respect lex maxwell rotE=_dB/dt+rot(v*B) and rotH=J+dD/dt and HrotE--Erot= =div(H*E) and this formlla must calculated at relativist speed_fast for with lex lorentz_ einstein __ __archaicxn lord
Best wishes. Thanks for sharing, Lord-Jesus-Christ com
@@luigiionascu7056 thank you mate 👊🏾 I was thinking exactly what you just said.
@@123demidog _sir the this callcul the must efectued for studyng of condition on equilibrium beetwen inter force from inside atom the force of strong nuclear the force of ellectromagnetyc the force of gravity and other force from inside atom_very very thank you very much__the must know the atom is in reality a little electric motor or generator because he not consuming energy conventional for the this movie from him _ __archaicxn lord
Why Einstein's image, why not Neil Bohr or Pauli. Einstein worship much?
I used to think I disliked chemistry because it's "difficult", but the person breaking down the information in this video makes me enjoy it. wow. thanks!
👍
😅😊😊😅😊😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😊😊😅😅😅😅😅😊😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😊😊😊😅😅😅😅😅😅l😅😊😅😅😊😅😊😅😅😅😊😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😊😅😅😊😊😊😅😊😅😊😅😅😅😅😊😅😅😅😅😅😊😅l😊😅😅😊😅😅😅😊😊😊😊😅😅😅😊😅😊😊😊l😊😊😅😊😊
@@nickkuuiii4169so true
Exactly lol this person made chemistry bearable and kinda interesting for me with this vid 😅
College professors seem to be much better at conveying complicated concepts in simple terms than high school teachers in my experience. The high school teachers often just omit stuff that is important for actually understanding the topic. But i will say the best history teacher i ever had was in high school
Thanks for helping this 60 year old who has decided to try to really understand the basics of chemistry. The best video by far!
Wow, thank you!
*When you learn more with a youtube video than in school*
I watched this at my school and I luv the vid
You just have a bad school trust me
@@kiyasadelawala9420 This is how we learn now.
always
@@palgunk5906 unfortunately there are several of those, notice many people post how visual videos are more effective than reading or hearing the professor talk
When someone asks me "From where have you graduated?".....I am like"TH-cam "
Yeah
yeah
haha simply my story
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Yep
The amount of excelence on youtube is stunning. Im using these wonderful videos in my school teaching to make the science come more alive :)
I don't think most people understand how absolutely amazing this discovery is... we're in a pixelated and vibrating universe the pixels (atoms) all vibrate at different frequencies...taking commands from the universal vibrating source.
I never understood chemistry in school. Thank you for breaking down the matter in such an elemental form.
I see what you did there.
Nice pun
me neither, but i would like to :)
Ba dum tshhhh
hhhhhhhhhhhh fantastic person
I know most of the video and I'm still impressed with all these info and the way it was organised. Amazing job.
As a high school science and chemistry teacher, I LOVE your videos and I'm so grateful! Keep making them!!!
are atoms different in size?
@@griselacosta598 6:08
how do i make a bomb
@@vindican462 find an atom, cut it in half, throw it at your nemesis while running as fast as you can in opposite direction while laughing like a madman.
Last part is optional but highly recomended.
yes.
Atoms of an element are equal to each other but are different in size from atoms of other elements.
Just sitting here reading a science book (for fun) that is beyond my comprehension. In looking up a few terms, I came across your absolutely wonderful video! So well produced, captivating and a perfect pace for the ADHD mind. I am excited to keep watching. Thanks for the great work!
start it with curiosity..
yhhh he's perfect for those with adhd.
Teacher: PAY ATTENTION
Me: why r cookies so complicated...
Fax
finally i'm feeling like i'm coming closer to understanding the reality of atoms. you're awesome!
This isn’t the thing I wanted, but I want to keep watching...
I'm trying to help my children get a better understanding of what an atom is. This was the best breakdown of an atom I've ever seen. Wish I saw this when I took Chemistry class.
Brought to you here by: *Science Teacher*
Same😂🤣
Same man
Same
I’m just here cause I’m to lazy to study the whole lesson from my book😭🔫
Yes i need 5 facts from this video -_-
um during quarantine I became such a science geek and started learning so much way ahead.. Chemistry Class is waiting for the boss arrival heehee
You're thorough, you're crystal clear. You're conscientious even with the right pronunciation of foreign names - which is fantastic, you're simply great!
Carry on like this👍
I am a teacher of chemistry and I absolutely love the way you have put the video together. My students will like the animation, the simplified way you have described terms and still managing to convey the technical definitions. Well done!
I love the way you use the phrase "building blocks of chemistry" rather than the way I learned back in the 1950's "building blocks of matter". Yours is way more accurate. Teaching is the process of passing knowledge on in a way that is understandable. If the student doesn't understand it, it's not teaching, just babbling.
Cowboy Frank's Personal Videos wish I could like this post a thousand times!!!
Cowboy Frank's Personal Video
agreed, one great coment you have thrown
Well said
True
Who's here because of quarantine? 😞
I hope you don't mind me as a substitute teacher.
Yep
Not I. But I guess a Stay Home or we'll flatten your tires State Governor mandate is a loosely enforced quarantine in itself. I am here simply to learn about the foundations of the Tim Horton breakfast and coffee I just consumed and of the furball deadly clawed predator that presently lays in my lap. Today makes my first visitation to understanding the Atom in over 40 years (since high school science class). Best brunch time ever, thanks to Stated Clearly.
I am doing online classes on this
Yeah science homework 😑
I'am 8th grade in Turkey and our 4th unit is about atoms. You made them very simple to understand and I'm learning the translation of the unit. So thank you so much for this great video.
Nice to see you're back.
Just wanted to say, I really appreciate your evolution series. It doesn't at all talk down to people who may disagree with you, and that's all too rare nowadays.
I am an elementary school teacher, and I wish that all teachers were able to explain things this clearly and simply for people who want to learn. I sometimes even fail at doing this, complicating explanations, which causes students to either be bored, or fail to understand altogether. This is stated very clearly. 👍🏼
I think it's because of time limitations, forget about time and then explain 😊
Nice explanation. It helped me a lot to continue my studies during this lockdown.
Thanks again.I am taking this channel as a teacher during this time.
Nobody ever explained it better than you! I wish if you were my chemistry teacher back then.
I’m glad that this video finally explained how we got to know what we know!
My; brother, you’re brilliant. Like, so brilliant, I’m willing to sound like an idiot to say it haha. You broke it down, in such a way, that I can now explain definitively, the difference between elements and atoms, w/not a confusing textbook definition that doesn’t really answer the question, but with relevant history that makes much more since as to the difference between the two. The difference is simply a result of the original ignorance of the fact that atoms exist. Logically/naturally, we found elements first, because they are massive conglomerates of smaller identical units. In other words, the purest form of substance, but not the smallest, hence, the atom. The atom is the smallest unit of an element, that is identical to other units of that element, with respect to proton - mass ratio, but also considering the range of said ratio, given the existence of isotopes. In any event, the amount of protons is consistent.
School in 2020 be like:
Ikr
i rather not ruined the 69 likes
It is now ruined
Yes 👍
people like me who survived 2020
Why would anyone down vote a free, well presented, clear educational video?
best science youtube channel ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I love the way you explain! Thank you so much! 💕💞❤️♥️
I usually don't comment on videos but this animation was remarkable! Hats off to you!
Best educational channel on youtube.
th-cam.com/users/Kurzgesagt is worth looking at as well
No, this is one of the most naive and subpar history of science videos I've seen on TH-cam. Skill in animations doesn't implicate understanding of science. This video doesn't even explain such a simple concept as Einstein's Brownian motions, instead tell us it is too mathematical to understand for people without mathematical understanding! Silly, silly, silly.
PBS spacetime is the 💣
@@denniscat9395 Perhaps worth looking at, but of course not "as well". Dear.
This was very well explained for ‘dummy, wishing I’d paid attention in school, Nana’ who’s grown curious over a lifetime. Thank you
Why is this channel not blowing..? I show these videos to my students and explain them too. These are really helpful.
My school uses all of your video
Amazing!
Yes I agree with you
Why won't they,when it's so good
Same
Same
Oh finally I can see atoms. It's not clickbait video. Thank you
Amazing video. I didn't expect it to go into as much detail and history as it did, but that was a great trip from the beginning ideas of atoms to the modern proof of their existence, summed up very well in only 12 minutes
th-cam.com/video/BXKf2gULsvA/w-d-xo.html
VERY NICE WAY OF TEACHING DURING LOCKDOWN
Your explanation so useful i have vever understood some course in school like this .
God bless you human. My curiosity of atoms finally found some peace. Great job 👍
You did great in your explanation! Thank you so much for helping me better understand chemistry!
This channel is soo underrated....
th-cam.com/video/BXKf2gULsvA/w-d-xo.html
Check my chanel
I am astonished at how you managed to balance breadth and depth, and include very modern developments. Pedagogical genius. Oh, and by the way, your pronunciation of "Jean Perrin" was perfect too (I am a native French speaker)!
This teacher makes chemistry simple by giving EVIDENCE for each step so we know why the chemists came to certain conclusions. I give him A+
While you technically can't see single individual atoms, you can actually see single sheets of atoms, in 2D Materials such as Graphene, MoS2, etc. They have a slight opacity in the visible spectrum even with one layer! That's pretty cool to be able to see. Thanks for the cool video!
I have seen atoms while meditating .
I loved how you cleared some Myths on Scientists and their achievements.First,How you mentioned in the small box about the Indian Philosopher Kanada and gave him credit which many eurocentric people don't.Second,Giving credit to the Arab Chemist.Fourth,Giving credit to Antoine's wife also.And also how you showed Einstein to be Younger in 1905.As,most people have set a picture of Einstein in their minds looking old with white uncombed hair.Amazing video.This helped me a lot!
Chemistry in hindi uses "Anu" for molecule, Paramanu(Same word used by kanada) for atom
I think this is the clearest explanation about atom I ever saw.
Best "Basics of an Atom" video I've seen so far, thank you!!! New sub!
Your way of intrepreting this topic is unmatched.
I love your work. You do take the channel's name rather seriously. :P
Hope you can post more frequently in the future.
the 3 others will be out within the next 2 months!
I think he focused more on how we know what they are and that they exist, hence the "lack of profundity". Also, as he said, there are more videos on this topic coming soon.
Pois é cara, esse canal é muito bom! Adoro rever os vídeos, mesmo já tendo uma boa noção de tudo, pois a explicação é perfeita, muito bem "mastigada".
Great studies tool for me and now I understand chemistry and stuck in my head
When u didnt give sh*t in online class and tomorrow is your exam...
[I literally regret not listening to my teacher:'( ]
Stop fucking up, man.
Yaaa
That quote in the beginning is simple, yet so valuable.
Thank You so much !! I am a 8th grade student taking high school classes and this really helped all the other videos talk too fast or don't go in depth I am definitely watching the whole animation series for chemistry. You gained a new sub
I am also an 8th grader :)
I should have watched this kind of videos when I was in high school.
wow! this video really help me understand the concept of atoms!
THANK YOU!!!!!! MY 3rd grade son was overwhelmed and bored to tears by his science book explaining these things.
This and your next episode basically covered EVERYTHING in the whole chapter and he liked it AND understood!
It has been TOOOO long since you have added to this category!
We would love a video "what is chemistry and physic"? or something like that, which explains what chemistry and physics are (the studies of matter and energy) and then clearly explain such things as properties, matter, volume, displacement, mass, density, buoyancy, malleability, ductility, and luster.
Another video about what makes things solid, amorphous solids, liquid, or gas, and freezing points, melting points, condensation points, and viscosity would THOROUGHLY save my son's first 8 weeks of school.
Looking forward into his book I'm already stressed about what is coming next:
Newton's 1st, 2nd, and 3rd laws... dynamics of motion, forms of energy, sound waves, frequencies, and light-waves, color spectrum, and then magnetism?!
And he is supposed to understand this all from a TEXTBOOK and boring fill in the blank worksheets?! Stated Clearly please save us!!
im in 8th grade and i just started studying atoms
ATOM.
Atom = electron (active) + proton (passive). In simple atom, 99.9% of the space is empty,
because the distance between electron and proton is 10^-10 m. But if one electron tied
two protons, then the distance is 10^15 m. (closer to each other by as much as
five orders of magnitude). The more complex the atom, the shorter the distance
and its outer space tends to zero, while the inner field increases and becomes nuclear.
All interactions (EM, nuclear, weak) are the result of the connection between electrons
and protons and depend on the distance (and conditions) of interaction. These
interactions obey Pauli's law: "There can be only one electron in an atom: simple or complex."
This video is AH-MAZING! Thank you SO much for making it! I was just introduced to chemistry and atoms today for an online anatomy and physiology class. The text was really difficult to grasp on it's own so I went to Google to hunt down something more dynamic that could explain the concepts better. WOW! Your video made my day and did the subject justice!!!
This video does an EXCELLENT job at highlighting key points and helping the novice learn.
Goosebumps by seeing the nitrogen atom.. You stated clearly about the introduction of atom.... Thank you stated clearly
I really appreciate this attempt
Wow. You are back!
I'm a little excited!
You're everywhere.
That's what daddy likes!!!!
No jumping into higher orbits unless your mom gives you permission!
I think it's an unfair portrayal of democritus and his theory. Democritus and his followers had many reasons for believing that reality was made from individual bits of stuff. In fact democritus was one of the first to take a non-teleological and mostly non-mystical view of the world. All things had natural laws and cause which ruled over interactions. An especially ignorant comment about Democritus is that infinity made him feel uncomfortable. Democrituss was one of the few of his time that embraced the infinite and the total lack of anything at all. The few that accepted the idea that time stretched into the past infinitely!
His theory of atoms DEPENDS on infinity being a rigorous thing. One of the most compelling arguments the Atomists had in favour of the atoms was the idea that since the universe has always existed and that things seem to be in constant decay(entropy, a mountain's rock wears down overtime) that like the particles of sand on a beach there must be a point at which things stop decaying over time otherwise there would nothing. This is why Democritus happily proclaims "nothing but atoms and the void".
Excited atoms tend to react more to things
What a time to be alive... you know aside from the COVID19 and stuff, but I mean we should be grateful for being able to see an actual atom
Part 2: why the uncuttable things can indeed be cut.
Beautiful.
We do have a video: What are atoms made of: th-cam.com/video/ooWfzpUIoNM/w-d-xo.html
@@StatedClearly yeah, some great videos. Your channel is fantastic and well laid out. Thanks for the link.
Stated Clearly, you have given my son and i such an in depth understanding of science. A beautiful and informative approach ! I look forward to everything you put out and will definitely contribute and donate more.
Wow, now I understand it. Thank you so much!
That’s crazy 😶
here bc of school?
number one biology royale
Pimpkin bunny?🐰🐰🐰🐰🐰🐰🐰🐰🐰🐰🐰🐰🐰🐰🐰🐰🐰🐰🐰🐰
Finally a video that explains atoms and elements broken down into understandable parts 😅 THANK YOU!!
Hello Mr. Romero's class!!
(I know im not the only one who scrolls through the comments 😏)
I cant believe they actually have a picture of a real atom this year, not just a scan. Science is so cool! Definitely add the picture of the atom to your next video. Thanks so much for the content.
Outstanding video. Your explanations are cogent, the information is relevant and well researched and your narration is excellent.
learned more in 11 minutes than I did in 4 weeks 45 minutes a day
Truly living up to the "Stated Clearly" name. Great, great job!
This is very useful and informative. Since I used to feel sleepy in my online class and lazy to open a one-hour recording video, I decided to just watch a lecture on TH-cam.
superb, I'm excited to continue watching this series
This channel is so nice wow
Nice to see you back after so long. 6 dislikes from law students.
😄😅😂🤣
a possible reason to dislike is because of the lack of actual atom pictures
Since the author has memorized the entire number of π, I don't need any more evidence. I believe everything he says.
this is the right channel name stated clearly
Thank you for translating it as "uncuttable" 👍
Wow. The title is appropriate. Stated Clearly. It really is. These videos are great. The REAL waste of time is NOT watching it.
Stated “very” clearly!
Atoms are themselves made of smaller pieces which cannot be divided more : they are called legos, they are the fundamental building blocks of life!
They’re called quarks and gluons
Well, I thought it was funny.
thats very true! and also, as Pluviophile stated, legos are made of atoms. so its a like a spiral getting smaller with each revolution .... legos...atoms....legos...atoms... until infinity
Excellent A'zhadial
What if all the stars, planets and whatnot in the universe are just sub-atomic particles in an atom?
THAT WAS ACTUALLY pretty awesome! I'm an adult taking grade 9 science for further education and you made the historical standpoint a lot more fun and pretty cool to know. I can't believe he guessed what the atoms looked like a thousand year before we had the technology. Just all these scientists and their ability to question and find answers is really incredible.
am a 6 grader i used to take this lesson how shoking...
I am in love with this video, the way you broke it down make it so easy to understand. This video answer all the questions that I had on this matter ( pun intended). Thank you so much, I’m a keep watching this over and over again.
What's inside atom?
What's inside of these small items that are in atoms?
Endless loop
no, there IS a bottom line
you can split atoms into quarks but you can't "split" thee quarks.
you just can't, even if you have a LHC in your backyard.
or maybe, if quarks are complexes of strings...
Democritus's argument for the existence atoms didn't have anything to do with matter's infinite divisability. It was a response to the argument ex nihilo nihil fit by Parmenides. Parmenides in his book physics argued that nothing comes from nothing, thus change is merely illusory. Democritus argued that the conclusion (change is merely illusory) doesn't follow from the premise (ex nihilo nihil fit) if the cosmos is made of indivisible units. The changes (growth, decay, etc...) that occur in nature are merely the rearranging of these indivisible units.
That guy woke af
Correct assessment. As you can see, these debates were philosophical and metaphysical concerning the nature of the universe, proposed without any collectible data. No empirical method. Not scientific as we define that today. They were couch musings of classical philosophers purported as scientists or naturalists. Thought experiments without even mathematics to back them up.
His prophetic idea well over 2000 years ago was in fact unprovable for many many centuries. Other similar but conflicting ideas eventually fell out of favor and were ignored by later thinkers and early naturalists and chemists. In the more recent centuries observations alluded indirectly to this ancient philosophy, and the ancient unsubstantiated philosophy became a guideline in the empirical quest as tools were developed to study elemental substance.
So would the science you see postulated in the presented timeline, and tools developed to prove what was, in reality, just a philosophical wild guess that orthodox scientists wanted to accept as true, since they were sprung from a over two thousand year school of thought in conflict with an alternate thought... Would the modern science exist without the prophetic but completely unsubstantiated leap of faith.
That is why empirical thought and investigation is only one aspect of human reason. It is counterproductive to respect ONLY that form of reason to the exclusion of the other three major forms. Without these prophetic postulations, we would have had little interest in seeing the unseen atom and our empirical science may have never looked. Science is not an absolute and will not always lead to all natural truths eventually. Many empirical efforts have led to false positives for decades or centuries, that were accepted. If false positives are taken as final truth, they will never be exposed as errors.
Always doubt and always question.
Nothing comes from nothing. I agree with this so how did the universe come to be. There was nothing at first so where the energy come from to cause a bang
@@rudy6222 What makes you think there was nothing before the big bang? Phycists don't know what happened because their equations can't tell them what happened early in the big bang. Their equations can't tell them because we don't know what the fundamental particles do at that level of heat.
Anyways, phycists have empirical evidence of matter coming from nonmatter.
@Pluviophile :
"I think they're trying to say the opposite. "Nothing comes from nothing."
Which means, if anything's there then it's origins must have been something rather than nothing.
And if the origins were "nothing", then there shouldn't have been anything.
Hence, nothing comes from nothing.
There must have been something before big bang which led to the formation of universe.
"
==Pretty much nobody argues that something comes from nothing.
The only time I have heard that argument is from creationists making a straw man arguments against the Big Bang or Lawrence Krauss.
The Big Bang theory makes no such claim. Creationists know that church goers aren't science savvy and are unlikely to pick up a book about the subject and so, creationists give themselves the freedom to lie about it.
When you read Lawrence Krauss's book, "A universe from nothing", he pretty much explains it in the first chapter. At one point in time, vacuum was considered a "nothing". Empty space was considered a "nothing". There is an experiment that suggests that particle pairs pop into existence and cancel each other out quickly, in other words, matter forms from "nothing".
Or stated in another way, the universe / empty space is not a true nothing. It is some sort of stuff with its own properties. 100 years ago, it was called a "nothing".
"There must have been something before big bang which led to the formation of universe."
==That's what human logic leads us to and no scientist, not even Krauss, is claiming that the universe came from nothing. The only people, making that claim are creationists.
Thank you for all of your videos, they are "Stated Clearly" enough for me to introduce my mother and nephews to evolution and science in general with easy to understand visuals.
One of the best animated lesson on the topic! Thanks for this!
this video deserves more views
Just a little bit of semantics but you can’t reverse a chemical reaction as you stated. It would take a separate new reaction to convert the compounds back to original form.
Yeaahhh
*entropy left the discussion*
0:55 thats a lot of views and likes
I wondered how long it would take for anyone to notice that ;)
Don’t stop making videos like these ;)
friggin bot accounts
Not a single dislike in the enitre biosphere
More likes than views? :)
Teacher: hi
Me: bye
Student: ohhhhhhhh
Teacher: get aut of klass
Me: no
Student:ohhhhhhhh
Teacher: get aut of school
My parents: wellcome to home
Me: rip
My friends: reast in piece
Eh.... I dont get it...?
Me neither
thanks for making this video, really help me alot
Thanks. Your teaching is fabulous
10:41 Huh, Ara Apkarian helped you on this. Neat.
Yes, he actually flew me out to see his lab! They are doing some crazy cool stuff!
0:45 Information blindly accepted; moving on with day.
Thanks for the great video.
Just one small correction: Jaber ebn e hayyan was a Persian chemist who was born in Tus (east of Iran).
Thanks, I have a note in the video description about this. A lot of western sources say he was Arabic but apparently it's not true, or at least it likely not true.
Thank you so much for the response. I am really impressed that you care so much about the accuracy of your talks.
Sure! you are right. It is a matter of dispute.
Anyway I doubt most people in the west would know the differences between Arabs and Persians! ;)
Best,
And keep up doing a great job!
omg who ever did this video thanks I really appreciate it !! it helped a lot !!