I got myself a 3L Camelbak Rogue in high visibility yellow for road riding which was as slim as I could go while still having a 120oz bladder, but that Chase is looking a lot more comfortable.
I guess it just comes down to your hydration needs. The 2 litre Chase is likely the best of both worlds; being slim and offering the size. The only restriction to keep in mind is the max 46cm size.
Looks like your Chase may fit better if you loosen the side straps more. This way, your chest straps would have more room for adjustability. You have the front shoulder straps almost sitting in your armpits.
Do you have any trouble accessing your back pockets with the Chase? It lookes like the Outlander leaves plenty of clearance for back pocket access but the Camelback appears to partially cover them.
Looks like I’ll go for the Chase, couldn’t decide before but don’t like the lack of storage and uncomfortable caveats with the uswe unit. Thanks
I got myself a 3L Camelbak Rogue in high visibility yellow for road riding which was as slim as I could go while still having a 120oz bladder, but that Chase is looking a lot more comfortable.
I guess it just comes down to your hydration needs. The 2 litre Chase is likely the best of both worlds; being slim and offering the size. The only restriction to keep in mind is the max 46cm size.
@@YourOwnAdventure Absolutely agree.
Looks like your Chase may fit better if you loosen the side straps more. This way, your chest straps would have more room for adjustability. You have the front shoulder straps almost sitting in your armpits.
Do you have any trouble accessing your back pockets with the Chase? It lookes like the Outlander leaves plenty of clearance for back pocket access but the Camelback appears to partially cover them.
Good question! Would like to know an answer to this...
Does this backpack damage clothes, t-shirts?
I haven't noticed any damage
You don't look a "Larry."
cool bro