I mean they could have done another challenge among the blue team to see who actually needed to leave. This is all because of this stupid person who stole the beef.. And the chef didnt even took action.. Unfair all the way.
There should have been a sanction for the other team stealing the beef. The blue team might have won if they had a few more plates of beef served, which would mean the red team would have had less dishes served, therefore reducing their earnings.
I disagree purely as it served as a learning experience for them all. You are right in that they "could" have won, but they lost their beef and lost the challenge, so learn from that.
@@rossomac21 right, because it is perfectly normal to have to constantly guard your beef in a kitchen because someone can steal it from your station. Absolutely normal and should be expected, huh?
That's the good thing about Masterchef Australia, it has learnt from the mistakes of the first few seasons, removed the unnecessary brutality, and realised that negativity isn't what people want to associate with food. Unlike a certain Masterchef US :)
@@hrishik_1503 Masterchef US never had eliminations on basis vote who should get eliminated. From first team challenge there was always a pressure test. Team members can never ever judge each other objectively
I think the Red team should have lost for taking the blue teams beef no matter who made the most money because if that had not happened the blue team would have one
@@jazmine5699 He didn't mean to take the beef that the blue team brought in, was on their side and then was actively asked about while he stayed silent? right... righttt...
They should've agreed to vote for themselves.. All of them.. so all of them will get 1 vote and maybe there will be another challenge to determine who will be eliminated
aahh economics game theory comes to mind.. if just one of them decided to vote for someone else, they'd be sure to be safe - with all others voting for themselves.. and everyone would be thinking the same thing in their self-interest so.. it wouldn't work.. If this were a REALLY competitive team, you'd see more votes for Sam as he could be a threat later - the strongest player and everything. But that would reveal what jerks they all were so they didn't do it :P .. this was a stupid way of elimination in this light-hearted kind of show.
This is peak reality TV, from the titles to that painfully drawn out voting sequence, to the house dynamics! Unbelievable that MasterChef went through this phase!
"I don't have the skills and knowledge of the other contestants but I have the passion....I'm not a good chef, but I'm a good cook". Not really the words of a master chef. If you don't have skills to match passion then passion is worthless. And if you admit to being a cook not a chef the begs the question why you think you should be in a master chef competition.
You know your COOKING show has very little going for it when you spend a whole episode (twenty plus minutes) eliminating a contestant without a morsel in sight. Just a maudlin collection of soap opera type heart string pulling. Those of us who follow the other national versions of Masterchef will immediately see the difference. Yawn.
I hate it when people get ''strategic'' in voting. It makes the winner completely pointless because the best chefs get voted out rather then the worst. I have 0 interest in watching people trying to earn the title master manipulater. I'm watching master CHEF. So cook food, and be judged for that. No other drama's please. the moment a great chef gets voted off for ''strategic'' reasons is the moment I stop watching.
I think people are failing to grasp why the judges didn't care that the beef was stolen. It served as a learning experience for people to be careful and alert (or it can potentially cost you big)
I think the judges failed to see the possible consequences of this judgement. Not penalizing theft (even if it serves to prove an idiotic lesson), could have set a precedent of sabotage for other challenges. Other than that, the lesson itself makes no sense to me. Being careful and alert is important in a kitchen, though you won't get far in a professional kitchen by nicking produce.
so you mean the judges wanted them all to get all paranoid in the kitchen all the time? Sounds like healthy work environment. Weird that the blue team didnt start stealing in every challenge after that. I mean, no consequences so why not?
Melissa really annoyed me. Those crocodile tears at 6:15 were cringe af for a grown woman. She was obviously the weakest cook in the team but still acted like a victim and tried to gain sympathy when no one forced her to quit her job for the competition. It was odd of her to vote for Nic when she begged him to not vote for her.
I sure hope there was some lesbian love story behind that last section of the show. But, I totally understand to keep things under wraps and not explicit.
This is a horrendous way to eliminate someone. Very unfair to expect them to do this and they should have all put blank paper on the spikes as mutiny. The judges should have observed and made the decision themselves.
I find it truly stupid that the team must decide who is the weakest one and who should go home I also find the 3 Chef's here so lazy that they're barely around lmao, masterchef us for the win!
With or without MasterChef and with or without winning, these people are going to make it to their dreams one day. Winning competitions does not make anyone a winner in life. Mostly it's the losers who succeed well. This is so wrong of this competition to have such open voting system and not enough they have done well in terms of cooking and still lost the team challenge, now they are punished sort of by emotional hardship to vote for elimination of a fellow team player. So so cruel. They could have had this anonymous. One day these people go out to the world and it's not good to them or their career. I am totally against this and hate this season one for this
I'm genuinely (and kindly) wondering if TV habits and tastes are that much different in Australia compared to the US, Canada, UK, France... Because I find this show so much different than the others. First, the level of competition is literally amateurish. It's so not on par with the countries I named. Second, it feels like reality TV more than a cooking competition with no elimination up to episode 10, then putting people in this position. Do people in Australia like that kind of Love Island whatever vibe? Is it about cooking or about drama. The Tom guy who stole the beef, literally lied about it on camera, still won, then asking everyone to turn on each other, WTF? In other Masterchef shows, the advantage or pitting people against each other is almost always done in a playful "game" way, but here it really felt heavy and guttery. Just my opinion.
Morbid Girl I know that it’s an old season, how could I not? Doesn’t change anything at all about my opinion. I’ve watched what I could find up to the last 2 which were indeed much better. But at the beginning they didn’t have a clue what they were doing and the “talent” was horrible compared to other countries. It also still feels way too artificially long, and reality TV.
@@buffywasright Season 1 also had: A host that's not a judge The fact that you can make the finals by winning 1 celebrity chef challenge The chance that you get to 4 chefs left then get eliminated in 9th (it wasn't in finals week tho). It didn't happen luckily
He didn’t steal the beef 🥩.. atleast you don’t know that for sure.. their kitchens were literally right next to each other, he must just have thought it was extra beef for his team! You saw how hectic the whole place was, it most likely was an honest mistake. The other guy should have been more careful knowing mix ups could happen.
AWWW HOW SWEEET... so, if anyone goes to your house, he can "find" a hundred dollars laying around and think "hey, extra money for my wallet!" honest mistake, right
@@andreguia1731 please borrow some sense and read my comment again... there were in a common space there wasn’t a proper separation to rule out the possibility of that mistake. I said “most likely” not “for certain” yes he could also have actually stolen it, it could have also been a mistake, my point was that, that guy should have been more careful.
![เปิด อาณาจักร หมื่นล้าน "สาระตั้ม" l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3XE0nPF4YkQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Im glad they got rid of this way of eliminating folk, its such a horrible way to do it.
Lmao sound like they were executed
Oh well who cares haha
Agree-Brutal ( producers fault- IMO) but AU came on to present the most consistently excellent MChef series…
well done.
I mean they could have done another challenge among the blue team to see who actually needed to leave. This is all because of this stupid person who stole the beef.. And the chef didnt even took action.. Unfair all the way.
That's what they do in the rest of the seasons.
There should have been a sanction for the other team stealing the beef. The blue team might have won if they had a few more plates of beef served, which would mean the red team would have had less dishes served, therefore reducing their earnings.
Agreed, odd decision by the creators there
I disagree purely as it served as a learning experience for them all. You are right in that they "could" have won, but they lost their beef and lost the challenge, so learn from that.
@@rossomac21 so the lesson is "crazy things happen like you could lose your beef"? What do you mean?
@@rossomac21 right, because it is perfectly normal to have to constantly guard your beef in a kitchen because someone can steal it from your station. Absolutely normal and should be expected, huh?
True. So sad and unfair
Such a brutal episode, glad they made it lighter and happier in later seasons! Think the creators made it unnecessarily heavy.
That's the good thing about Masterchef Australia, it has learnt from the mistakes of the first few seasons, removed the unnecessary brutality, and realised that negativity isn't what people want to associate with food. Unlike a certain Masterchef US :)
Please, Can you just tell me what did you feel bad about this episode
Masterchef Australia is not the best show.
@@hrishik_1503 Masterchef US never had eliminations on basis vote who should get eliminated. From first team challenge there was always a pressure test. Team members can never ever judge each other objectively
That's the word. Brutal.
I think the Red team should have lost for taking the blue teams beef no matter who made the most money because if that had not happened the blue team would have one
tomy hosby should be eliminated because he stole the beef.That is so unfair.
He didn't mean to steal it
It was Brent's responsibility since he is in charge of cooking it
@@jazmine5699 so if you let a hundred dollars in your table at home, anyone can get it, and its fair game?
@@jazmine5699 He can't cook it since it was stolen! WTF are you on? Lol
@@jazmine5699 He didn't mean to take the beef that the blue team brought in, was on their side and then was actively asked about while he stayed silent? right... righttt...
Yes he should have been eliminated.
Who's responsible for putting spoilers in the thumbnail... that's just wrong.
totally.
I think the judges were supposed to penalty the beef thief from the red team, not Melissa
Yeah
I like it better when they do a pressure test. it is all fair. I think that Tom should have been eliminated.
“I took the beef, I didn’t steal it “ ??? What on earth are you talking about ? Tom Mosby !
He is a lying lawyer.
At 19:37 I thought she was about to walk out without saying goodbye 😂😂😂
They should've agreed to vote for themselves.. All of them.. so all of them will get 1 vote and maybe there will be another challenge to determine who will be eliminated
aahh economics game theory comes to mind.. if just one of them decided to vote for someone else, they'd be sure to be safe - with all others voting for themselves.. and everyone would be thinking the same thing in their self-interest so.. it wouldn't work.. If this were a REALLY competitive team, you'd see more votes for Sam as he could be a threat later - the strongest player and everything. But that would reveal what jerks they all were so they didn't do it :P .. this was a stupid way of elimination in this light-hearted kind of show.
Judges should decide on elimination through a pressure test.
Damn. It’s shocking how far master chef Australia has come since season 1. No idea it used to be so brutal.
True
With the meat they would surely won so there should be no elimination.
This is peak reality TV, from the titles to that painfully drawn out voting sequence, to the house dynamics! Unbelievable that MasterChef went through this phase!
"I don't have the skills and knowledge of the other contestants but I have the passion....I'm not a good chef, but I'm a good cook". Not really the words of a master chef. If you don't have skills to match passion then passion is worthless. And if you admit to being a cook not a chef the begs the question why you think you should be in a master chef competition.
Passion alone isn't a winning formula.
Oh this is so brutal...and demoralizing even to the ones staying back.
Melissa : "I am not a chef, I am a good cook". What do you cook if you can't cut?
You know your COOKING show has very little going for it when you spend a whole episode (twenty plus minutes) eliminating a contestant without a morsel in sight. Just a maudlin collection of soap opera type heart string pulling. Those of us who follow the other national versions of Masterchef will immediately see the difference. Yawn.
Thank god it got better
Wow this is horrible. I think it's worse because you know they're not being strategic.
I hate it when people get ''strategic'' in voting. It makes the winner completely pointless because the best chefs get voted out rather then the worst. I have 0 interest in watching people trying to earn the title master manipulater. I'm watching master CHEF. So cook food, and be judged for that. No other drama's please. the moment a great chef gets voted off for ''strategic'' reasons is the moment I stop watching.
never thought that this was how they eliminated cooks during the first season. this is so unfair, this is not a popularity contest.
I'm glad they didn't continue this voting thing.
Erm. Help.. I need Nino jokes in here.
The romantic tension between Melissa and Poe at the end tho. Melissa wanted to say "give me a hug" 🥺
Romantic? I only saw friendship, personally.
If they are all this much of an emotional mess after each elimination 😂😂😂
Stupid way of elimination.. blehhh.
I think people are failing to grasp why the judges didn't care that the beef was stolen. It served as a learning experience for people to be careful and alert (or it can potentially cost you big)
I think the judges failed to see the possible consequences of this judgement. Not penalizing theft (even if it serves to prove an idiotic lesson), could have set a precedent of sabotage for other challenges. Other than that, the lesson itself makes no sense to me. Being careful and alert is important in a kitchen, though you won't get far in a professional kitchen by nicking produce.
so you mean the judges wanted them all to get all paranoid in the kitchen all the time? Sounds like healthy work environment. Weird that the blue team didnt start stealing in every challenge after that. I mean, no consequences so why not?
getting hell's kitchen vibes from these last couple of episodes, lmao. thought i was watching masterchef !
Melissa really annoyed me. Those crocodile tears at 6:15 were cringe af for a grown woman. She was obviously the weakest cook in the team but still acted like a victim and tried to gain sympathy when no one forced her to quit her job for the competition. It was odd of her to vote for Nic when she begged him to not vote for her.
why put these new contestants through putting someone out
What a disgusting idea - a cooking challange should be used to eliminate a person not this way.
The 🎶 intro make me happy!!!
I sure hope there was some lesbian love story behind that last section of the show. But, I totally understand to keep things under wraps and not explicit.
This is a horrendous way to eliminate someone. Very unfair to expect them to do this and they should have all put blank paper on the spikes as mutiny. The judges should have observed and made the decision themselves.
I find it truly stupid that the team must decide who is the weakest one and who should go home I also find the 3 Chef's here so lazy that they're barely around lmao, masterchef us for the win!
It got so much better tho
Its not fair way of elimination.
@@nachoalvarez7171 who cares?
@@klaudiagrob well because this was 2009 and they did necessary changes after this 1st season
The voting reminds me of survivor!
Poh-Lucy Liu
I too had the same thought, she really looks like Lucy Liu in certain angles/shots
With or without MasterChef and with or without winning, these people are going to make it to their dreams one day. Winning competitions does not make anyone a winner in life. Mostly it's the losers who succeed well. This is so wrong of this competition to have such open voting system and not enough they have done well in terms of cooking and still lost the team challenge, now they are punished sort of by emotional hardship to vote for elimination of a fellow team player. So so cruel. They could have had this anonymous. One day these people go out to the world and it's not good to them or their career. I am totally against this and hate this season one for this
She had to go. She was worst. Tom next i hope. Stealing other teams stuff.
its not fair
Tom should be eliminated, because he steel the meat
Is this a cooking show?
jesus, it's just cooking.perspective
I'm genuinely (and kindly) wondering if TV habits and tastes are that much different in Australia compared to the US, Canada, UK, France... Because I find this show so much different than the others. First, the level of competition is literally amateurish. It's so not on par with the countries I named. Second, it feels like reality TV more than a cooking competition with no elimination up to episode 10, then putting people in this position. Do people in Australia like that kind of Love Island whatever vibe? Is it about cooking or about drama. The Tom guy who stole the beef, literally lied about it on camera, still won, then asking everyone to turn on each other, WTF? In other Masterchef shows, the advantage or pitting people against each other is almost always done in a playful "game" way, but here it really felt heavy and guttery. Just my opinion.
Dude. This is old season which was aired in 2009. Make researches.
Morbid Girl I know that it’s an old season, how could I not? Doesn’t change anything at all about my opinion. I’ve watched what I could find up to the last 2 which were indeed much better. But at the beginning they didn’t have a clue what they were doing and the “talent” was horrible compared to other countries. It also still feels way too artificially long, and reality TV.
@@buffywasright gordan would have eliminated tom immediately
@@buffywasright Season 1 also had:
A host that's not a judge
The fact that you can make the finals by winning 1 celebrity chef challenge
The chance that you get to 4 chefs left then get eliminated in 9th (it wasn't in finals week tho). It didn't happen luckily
Also you almost can't complain about the length of every season
Face it, she can't cook.
Oh Tom shaddaup ... thief
HAHAHAHA
This is mad funny
23:56
He didn’t steal the beef 🥩.. atleast you don’t know that for sure.. their kitchens were literally right next to each other, he must just have thought it was extra beef for his team! You saw how hectic the whole place was, it most likely was an honest mistake. The other guy should have been more careful knowing mix ups could happen.
the one n-word is protecting another
how surprising
@@TheLoveKusano 👏🏻👏🏼👏🏽👏🏾👏🏿
AWWW HOW SWEEET... so, if anyone goes to your house, he can "find" a hundred dollars laying around and think "hey, extra money for my wallet!" honest mistake, right
@@andreguia1731 please borrow some sense and read my comment again... there were in a common space there wasn’t a proper separation to rule out the possibility of that mistake. I said “most likely” not “for certain” yes he could also have actually stolen it, it could have also been a mistake, my point was that, that guy should have been more careful.
@@TheLoveKusano pls link to the time he stole
First