Great job with your videos! I'm not the only one who had mentored this: 9:15: ...after playing F6,, Knight to E5 will arrive on the board. You have to play Queen to D6. Then HIS Knight will arrive at D7, checking MY king. 10:26: If you dare capture the Knight on D5, HE will recapture., not "I will recapture" because that is Torch you are referring to! 10:35: "This will create a full square cubic puzzle where HE can initiate an attack.. . After "I" recapture, HIS Queen can capture the rook.... and initially, HE will win the rook and all the pieces. MY King will have to move up, and HE will win the Queen. Too many instances to count, but you actually talk about him, while referring to yourself in the first person. It can sometimes be confusing and frustrating when trying to follow along! I Me mine my myself He him his- you your yours- we us our ours. That should cover it!
9:16 I was Just analysing My Position as White! It's a Beautiful Comment that I ever seen. I will Focus to correct these errors in my commentary. Thanks
@Stockfish18 You're real! Thank you so much for your reply. I was definitely not trying to be mean-spirited. I see what you are saying in regards to that perspective. It throws me off a little bit, I admit. Stockfish, I am sorry I am only human, but like a 200 ELO player, I promise to get better!
Stockfish: Follow the match : Deep Blue vs. Kasparov, Round 5. 1996. 0-1. Analyse how Kasparov won with black pieces against the best ever Chess Engine. Maybe you will get a clue ....how to win with black pieces...😅😅😅😅
I think you're wrong Stockfish about the second Queen-trap. After Nc3 Black can simply take the Bishop with the King (since there is no more fork on e5 with the Queen on g3) Ne2 would no longer trap the Queen since g6 would be open as a retreating square.
I also thought about this but if he tares taking bishop with the king, play knight c3 to e2, queen goes g6 and like a g6 you just slap knight f3 to e5 forking queen an king
Yes I love it but not for you for me I'm the first one who already learned,taught myself,started and the only way I played a style almost 50 years ago and already provened in 2005 2006 around this time beating deep fritz 8 and knowing the thought process of a style to advance to a higher elo such as a 3200 which they did not have but I heard them say about a playing strengthen of 3200 in the game or engine but one move and a thought process now if this is true then im 3200 with a 3500 strength now you might say still you just beat it yes but what you don't understand I beat it that it can only be physically fixed by changing one move in the opening and my opening and style came all in one with the thought processes and my very first chess game I won with almost 50 years ago,look at it this way , it's a opening into a opening that never seems to open but any way I wished you would have won for this playing style but you will find it or find out working this way and my book is coming out and when they see this one part they will not understand but it's what i seen as a 11 and 12 year old boy bye bye have a nice day😮
let me share with you another inspirational quote; You need to lose sometimes to appreciate victory 🤣🤣🤣
I love the dialogue and humor, and the animations, as well as explanations. :)
Congratulations to whoever writes the script. Your analysis was superb.
Great job with your videos!
I'm not the only one who had mentored this:
9:15: ...after playing F6,, Knight to E5 will arrive on the board. You have to play Queen to D6. Then HIS Knight will arrive at D7, checking MY king.
10:26: If you dare capture the Knight on D5, HE will recapture., not "I will recapture" because that is Torch you are referring to!
10:35: "This will create a full square cubic puzzle where HE can initiate an attack.. . After "I" recapture, HIS Queen can capture the rook.... and initially, HE will win the rook and all the pieces. MY King will have to move up, and HE will win the Queen.
Too many instances to count, but you actually talk about him, while referring to yourself in the first person. It can sometimes be confusing and frustrating when trying to follow along!
I Me mine my myself
He him his- you your yours- we us our ours.
That should cover it!
9:16 I was Just analysing My Position as White!
It's a Beautiful Comment that I ever seen. I will Focus to correct these errors in my commentary. Thanks
@Stockfish18 You're real! Thank you so much for your reply. I was definitely not trying to be mean-spirited. I see what you are saying in regards to that perspective. It throws me off a little bit, I admit. Stockfish, I am sorry I am only human, but like a 200 ELO player, I promise to get better!
Thank you!
Your dialogues make me to wait for your videos. They are hilarious!
Stockfish is the best chess commentator ever.
"Stockfish is the best chess commentator ever.": No, I prefer a person.
Stockfish: Follow the match : Deep Blue vs. Kasparov, Round 5. 1996. 0-1. Analyse how Kasparov won with black pieces against the best ever Chess Engine. Maybe you will get a clue ....how to win with black pieces...😅😅😅😅
"and the queen is stuck like she missed the last train home"
I think you're wrong Stockfish about the second Queen-trap. After Nc3 Black can simply take the Bishop with the King (since there is no more fork on e5 with the Queen on g3) Ne2 would no longer trap the Queen since g6 would be open as a retreating square.
That Doesn't matter because Your queen on the g file is already trapped, giving me the Opportunity to attack the queen By my other knight on c3 to e2.
I also thought about this but if he tares taking bishop with the king, play knight c3 to e2, queen goes g6 and like a g6 you just slap knight f3 to e5 forking queen an king
How did sf16 lose this... Wth!
Stockfish had very fishy analogies in this one.
Satrançta bayaa kuvvetli😊
I'm not sure Stocky knows if he is Black or White lol.
In 1961, Fischer claimed the King's gambit was no good.
Apparently he was mistaken.😄
Why not flip Torch and Stockfish on the lower right of the screen, to create less confusion? I know it says who is which color, but c'mon.
Ava ne kuvvetli adam by😊
A czemu po prostu nie zostałeś kontr-gabit, w drugim ruchu d5 po prostu.
Istaam acildi 😊
You erred Stockfish, female octopi have 8 legs and the males have 7. The last and 8th appendage being the reproductive organ. So "his" is wrong @9:56.
according to him he doesn't actually 'make' moves he only 'considers' them
Nasi canim satrac cekti simdi😊
I find you calling your opponents moves "I will..." very confusing. Please say "he will".
To be honest he teach us better than GothamChess
Vay vay😊
Kombinazona bak ne gizli cakal gibi😊
King's gambit never works
It just did
Yes I love it but not for you for me I'm the first one who already learned,taught myself,started and the only way I played a style almost 50 years ago and already provened in 2005 2006 around this time beating deep fritz 8 and knowing the thought process of a style to advance to a higher elo such as a 3200 which they did not have but I heard them say about a playing strengthen of 3200 in the game or engine but one move and a thought process now if this is true then im 3200 with a 3500 strength now you might say still you just beat it yes but what you don't understand I beat it that it can only be physically fixed by changing one move in the opening and my opening and style came all in one with the thought processes and my very first chess game I won with almost 50 years ago,look at it this way , it's a opening into a opening that never seems to open but any way I wished you would have won for this playing style but you will find it or find out working this way and my book is coming out and when they see this one part they will not understand but it's what i seen as a 11 and 12 year old boy bye bye have a nice day😮
That‘s not the king’s gambit accepted!
So what is it? Part of tbe video is King's gambit accepted.
5000 j bin puganolurlar😊
Hadi ben uyuyom😊😊
You nvr win against torch with black
Black never get developed entire game.
🤓
a bit too much verbal diarrhea
🤓