On Wednesday, lawyers for Karen Read said they've heard from another juror, claiming the panel voted to acquit her of two charges. WBZ-TV's Tammy Mutasa reports.
Complete bold faced lie that they couldn't come back split on the charges. Every single charge stands on it's own and can get a separate guilty or not guilty. WTF is going on in Massachusetts???
Unless Massachusetts has a different law like so many other things they do differently in their court/legal system that doesn’t make sense. And I am referring more to the procedural things and how they run their court. Like not being required to give a reason for an objection, the confusion verdict forms, not allowing the attorneys to view the jurors letter themselves, The Judge not questing the jurors as to what charges they were hung on.
Read your own comment and then watch the report again. Or you can just read this. The jury had reached a verdict on 2 of the 3 charges, that being not guilty for both, but they could not reach a verdict the 2nd count. So what she said was true, you just misunderstood it. A jury has to deliberate on all charges and come to a verdict, they just can’t tell the judge that they find the person not guilty on 2 accounts and ignore the other charge. If all charges are not decided, then it is a mistrial. That is what she meant by “all or nothing”.
@@TheCrazyMoparDude68 You are incorrect In your overall description. The jury could very well have A partial verdict on some of the counts, Acquitting her of those on which they have all 12 in consensus, With the basis for a Hung jury leading to mistrial would only be open that single count on which they were hung to retry her. The other 2, The judge would have to enter the verdict of not guilty, But no verdict on the manslaughter charge
I'm considering Contacting the American Bar Association to report inaccurate legal statements tight after making a report to Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) that's not ok
who is that woman the pink jacket at the end spewing nonsense? Of course a jury CAN acquit on some charges and be hung on others. It's called a "partial verdict." If there are multiple offenses (or defendants), the jury may return a verdict on fewer than all of the charges or defendants with the consent of the court. The court may accept a partial verdict and require the jury to continue deliberating on the remaining charges. If the jury is unable to reach a verdict on any of the remaining charges, the court may declare a mistrial ON THOSE CHARGES. The defendant may be retried on the charges on which the jury was unable to reach a verdict, unless doing so would violate double jeopardy. That's from the mass. government website!!
If I was family of John O'Keefe, I would be furious with the investigators, DA and court for all the damage they have caused concerning this case. Whether they believe Read to be guilty or innocent, it shouldn't blind them to the damage that has been done by the State. I would never forgive these so called professionals for being so incompetent and unprofessional with a case that meant that much to me to be done right.
Agree with this 💯. A retrial won't help when 2 of your officers testifying have been placed on leave regarding their behavior during this investigation. There will never not be reasonable doubt now.
So far one third of the jury has come forward and shown us the contradiction between what that corrupt judge announced and what really happened in that jury room. What's next, indict those jurors for telling the truth?
2:10 That might be true in Ma but this judge in TN same thing happened. Multiple counts the jury came bk hung, but the judge ask do you have verdicts on the other count. They did and they found him not guilty on 2 counts and declared a mistrial for the hung count
Violation of Rule 4.1: This rule prohibits lawyers from making false statements of fact or law to third parties. Violation of Rule 8.4: This rule prohibits lawyers from engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation. Violation of Rule 3.6(a) This rule prohibits lawyers from making false or misleading public statements about a legal matter.
The members of the public who spoke on behalf of citizens of Canton who had protested against the manner in which the Canton police and District Attorney handled the investigation into the death of Officer O’Keefe, spoke persuasively.
Please worship the CREATOR OF THE UNIVERSE, THE LORD GOD and try not to worry too much about the differences between the different religions and denominations, try to think about the similarities and the things they may have in common more than the differences. Daily prayer is a fundamental part that many people do not practice although it is encouraged "CREATOR OF THE UNIVERSE, LORD GOD, I beg you to never force me to worship any false god or object and I ask you for forgiveness for my sins and immorality. Thank you for everything. Amen." 🙏🙏🙏 Please pray this now, pray the words as you read them if you cannot look and remember them 🙏
Complete bold faced lie that they couldn't come back split on the charges. Every single charge stands on it's own and can get a separate guilty or not guilty. WTF is going on in Massachusetts???
How can you go on TV and say stuff without having verified that information first? crazy.
Whoever that legal analyst is needs to be fired. She is 100% INcorrect.
your analyst is wrong each charge gets a verdict its not an all or nothing
Unless Massachusetts has a different law like so many other things they do differently in their court/legal system that doesn’t make sense. And I am referring more to the procedural things and how they run their court. Like not being required to give a reason for an objection, the confusion verdict forms, not allowing the attorneys to view the jurors letter themselves, The Judge not questing the jurors as to what charges they were hung on.
Read your own comment and then watch the report again.
Or you can just read this. The jury had reached a verdict on 2 of the 3 charges, that being not guilty for both, but they could not reach a verdict the 2nd count. So what she said was true, you just misunderstood it. A jury has to deliberate on all charges and come to a verdict, they just can’t tell the judge that they find the person not guilty on 2 accounts and ignore the other charge. If all charges are not decided, then it is a mistrial. That is what she meant by “all or nothing”.
@@TheCrazyMoparDude68 You are incorrect In your overall description. The jury could very well have A partial verdict on some of the counts, Acquitting her of those on which they have all 12 in consensus, With the basis for a Hung jury leading to mistrial would only be open that single count on which they were hung to retry her. The other 2, The judge would have to enter the verdict of not guilty, But no verdict on the manslaughter charge
@@zyrosqrd2552yep the defense made sure the jurors could vote on each individual charge
@@crimenurse8264 don't be silly, state's can't override US constitution
I'm considering Contacting the American Bar Association to report inaccurate legal statements tight after making a report to Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) that's not ok
Can not believe that 'analyst' claims two unanimous verdicts wouldnt count without all being decided
Do it! Don't just sit on your hands.
She is so guilty.
Shouldn't this have been determined prior to the judge officially concluding the trial???
In normal circumstances yes of course. But this judge dismissed the jurors ASAP and that ended the court case.....😐
Judge cannoli needs to get fired, arrested, tried and thrown in jail.
JUDGE BOUGHT OFF BY FAMILY CLICK INSIDE ALBERT HOUSEHILD
I bet Auntie Bev, along with the rest of the cast of players, wished they never heard KRs name!! I’m glad the jury members are coming forward
who is that woman the pink jacket at the end spewing nonsense? Of course a jury CAN acquit on some charges and be hung on others. It's called a "partial verdict."
If there are multiple offenses (or defendants), the jury may return a verdict on fewer than all of the charges or defendants with the consent of the court.
The court may accept a partial verdict and require the jury to continue deliberating on the remaining charges.
If the jury is unable to reach a verdict on any of the remaining charges, the court may declare a mistrial ON THOSE CHARGES.
The defendant may be retried on the charges on which the jury was unable to reach a verdict, unless doing so would violate double jeopardy. That's from the mass. government website!!
If I was family of John O'Keefe, I would be furious with the investigators, DA and court for all the damage they have caused concerning this case. Whether they believe Read to be guilty or innocent, it shouldn't blind them to the damage that has been done by the State. I would never forgive these so called professionals for being so incompetent and unprofessional with a case that meant that much to me to be done right.
Agree with this 💯. A retrial won't help when 2 of your officers testifying have been placed on leave regarding their behavior during this investigation. There will never not be reasonable doubt now.
Judge should have known better now let her pay along with the sp and canton police
So far one third of the jury has come forward and shown us the contradiction between what that corrupt judge announced and what really happened in that jury room.
What's next, indict those jurors for telling the truth?
2:10 That might be true in Ma but this judge in TN same thing happened. Multiple counts the jury came bk hung, but the judge ask do you have verdicts on the other count. They did and they found him not guilty on 2 counts and declared a mistrial for the hung count
Exactly anyalst is a fool
Violation of Rule 4.1: This rule prohibits lawyers from making false statements of fact or law to third parties.
Violation of Rule 8.4: This rule prohibits lawyers from engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.
Violation of Rule 3.6(a) This rule prohibits lawyers from making false or misleading public statements about a legal matter.
judge is WICKED WICKED WICKED
Corrupt and biased more accurate descriptors for her.
They werent 'ready to acquit her' they DID acquit her on two charges...
The members of the public who spoke on behalf of citizens of Canton who had protested against the manner in which the Canton police and District Attorney handled the investigation into the death of Officer O’Keefe, spoke persuasively.
No they are individual charges. That is incorrect and false information. I agree with the previous comment.
Nobody knows that the “previous comment” is 🤦♂️
@@MM12684 if they read the comments like you just did then they will figure it out🤦🏽♀️
That's inappropriate and would cause a mistrial in it's own right
THE JURY AQUITTED REED BUT JUDGE HATES KAREN REED
Terrible reporting on this case.
No wonder we all go to independent news sources.
She's innocent police coverup
Its called the constitution!!!!!!!!! Read it!!!!!!!@🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 thanks do your homework next time ???? Mabey!!!! 🎉🎉😢
Karen Read is Guilty
How do prosecutors go on with life, knowing they're destroying lives by putting innocent people into prisons! Whats worse, a judge or prosecutor/
Is this 4 or 5 jurors?
True crooks
According to Roman, double jeopardy is not a thing anymore?
Girl power!!!!!!😢🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 rocks!!!!!!!❤❤❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Shes So Guilty!!
Auntie bev is for sure
#FreeKarenRead
Jennifer just lied
Shity reporting
Elaborate?
These people are always pro state COWARDS
She should Not b Free!!
Is this the way a humble person, who lost a very close friend acts?
Please worship the CREATOR OF THE UNIVERSE, THE LORD GOD and try not to worry too much about the differences between the different religions and denominations, try to think about the similarities and the things they may have in common more than the differences. Daily prayer is a fundamental part that many people do not practice although it is encouraged
"CREATOR OF THE UNIVERSE, LORD GOD, I beg you to never force me to worship any false god or object and I ask you for forgiveness for my sins and immorality. Thank you for everything. Amen." 🙏🙏🙏
Please pray this now, pray the words as you read them if you cannot look and remember them 🙏
No
She is so guilty...
She is so guilty.
She is so guilty.