Siskel & Ebert (1992): The Public Eye, Candyman, Under Siege & A River Runs Through It
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ก.พ. 2021
- 0:00 Intro
0:51 The Public Eye - Siskel 👎 & Ebert 👍
5:05 Candyman - Siskel 👎 & Ebert 👍
8:21 Under Siege - 👍👍
12:06 In Current Release
12:22 A River Runs Through It - 👍👍
16:09 Night In The City - 👎👎
18:55 Home Video of the week: Paperhouse (1988)
19:46 The reviews
Under Siege, Candyman, and A River Runs Through It are all good movies.
Went into Candyman at 11 thinking i was fixing to watch a Jason/Freddy type flick. However i was left feeling terrfied and LOVED every second of it.
Can't forget Gary Busey in Under Seige. He's hilarious in it!
Candyman is one of the darkest movies I’ve ever seen
Why in the hell would they remake Night and The City ?
Just like True Lies, Under siege is fun action movie to watch & I enjoy a lot. It's predictable, has humor, full of energy, good performance & great villains - Tommy Lee Jones & Gary Busey. Segal is a funny hero, plays former Navy-turned chief & Erika as the playboy turn-sidekick take out mercenaries on the Navy ship. I strongly recommend because it's a lot of fun. 👍⭐⭐⭐⭐
Candyman 👍 ⭐️⭐️ & a half out of 4
Loved candyman when I first saw it but I will say my first thought when I saw him was "oh wait he looks like a pimp" 😂
but here is my review, having just watched it for the first time , I have heard of this film, but thought it was a knock off of krugger and those type of 90s horror icons, or the 70s-80s, i like the stylistic choices, the setting was great, really 90s, in terms of look and what people are wearing, but i liked the candy man as a horror icon, i mean he has a hook which is fun, and i wish we got rated r in this, because they were teasing us with one adolf nipple, give us more go full out if you giving us a piece, but anyways, I had a good time with it, i liked it, the only con i have is i dont get why the candy man is going after her, that doesnt make sense, it would make sense if he was killing everyone, but is making her life miserable, and that really gives me a step down in terms of knowing why he does what he does, the backstory is fine, and i liked the fact, that candy man causes her to go crazy, but we have seen it in horror before, so i dont know, i love the gore blood i think horror fans will appreciate that, i just wonder how jordan peele produced one will be like, but i will watch the sequels and finish this franchise once and for all. I mean i guess the candy man is killing people, around her, but that also doesnt make sense. But as a horror movie its great, i would give it 4/5 for a horror movie, strictly for the horror genre, horror genre is always a hit or miss for me, and with the visuals and everything else i thought it was great.
Just saw "A River Runs Through It" and wow, what a masturbatory film. The snobby overly flowery narration, the shoot the chutes scene was redundant and far too early in the film (we know nothing will happen to them), the go-nowhere Indian then Brother-in-law subplots, the gambling den scene (we know Brad Pitt isn't going to die because he hasn't caught the big fish seen in promotional material) and the best line, "I'm never leaving Montana, Brother" is BS because Paul was actually killed in Chicago- which we never see. What a cop out.
Siskel was such a wimp.