Hello, I am trying to use my Hx effect to run all 9 effects at the same time if I want, but what I want to do is have 3 of the 9 always on in the background and still be able to switch on and off any of the 6 on my main interface but thos three in the background always stay on, right now I have those 3 assigned to 3 different switches so 2 effects on each switch.. Do u know how I can do this?
If you want those three alway on, then there's no need to assign them to a footswitch at all. Just configure them to be unassigned and use the footswitches for the 6 you do turn on and off. Hope that helps.
i have a roland jc 22, it got fx loops and can work in parallel. my goal is to get two signals at the same time, one with compressor, distortions, etc (everything before the fx loops block in my hx) and my delays and modulations i want them clean, 100% wet... but when i set them 100% wet no matter what i do the delay is repeating with distortion... when i run it in series it works but it sucks tone it sound very different. in parallel without using distortion before the fx loop, the sound is perfect, i want the clean delay parallel to the distorted guitar. any clues on what i'm missing here? i mean it has to be possible to do what i intend or is it really necessary to use two amps to get this 100% wet + 100% dry setup that i'm trying to get?
Thank you for the really informative video. A question, even if you place the fuzz on a parallel path when it comes back into the main path, even though further along wouldn’t they still be running into each other?
It would only be running into effects that come after the rejoining point. The merge will sum the signal, not cause them to interact with each other. Hope that helps.
Your tutorials are much better and cool than those on the official channel. Thank you so much for your work, I really appreciate them.
Thanks very much. That's nice to hear. 😀
Well done! A very clear explanation beautifully presented. Many thanks for taking the trouble to help others.
Thank you. Glad it was helpful!
Very useful video as a brand new HX Effects owner. Thank you!
Thank you, very useful !
Exactly what I was looking for dual delays! Thanks!
Thanks. Very helpful
Very helpful. Thank you!
Hello, I am trying to use my Hx effect to run all 9 effects at the same time if I want, but what I want to do is have 3 of the 9 always on in the background and still be able to switch on and off any of the 6 on my main interface but thos three in the background always stay on, right now I have those 3 assigned to 3 different switches so 2 effects on each switch.. Do u know how I can do this?
If you want those three alway on, then there's no need to assign them to a footswitch at all. Just configure them to be unassigned and use the footswitches for the 6 you do turn on and off. Hope that helps.
@@thehont8648 thanks mate, I actually did figure that out just after I sent the message : ) but thanks very much anyways mate
I'm glad you asked as I didn't realise this could be done! Thank you both - for the question and the answer.
i have a roland jc 22, it got fx loops and can work in parallel. my goal is to get two signals at the same time, one with compressor, distortions, etc (everything before the fx loops block in my hx) and my delays and modulations i want them clean, 100% wet... but when i set them 100% wet no matter what i do the delay is repeating with distortion... when i run it in series it works but it sucks tone it sound very different. in parallel without using distortion before the fx loop, the sound is perfect, i want the clean delay parallel to the distorted guitar. any clues on what i'm missing here? i mean it has to be possible to do what i intend or is it really necessary to use two amps to get this 100% wet + 100% dry setup that i'm trying to get?
Thank you for the really informative video. A question, even if you place the fuzz on a parallel path when it comes back into the main path, even though further along wouldn’t they still be running into each other?
It would only be running into effects that come after the rejoining point. The merge will sum the signal, not cause them to interact with each other. Hope that helps.
@@thehont8648 I’m sure that it will. Thanks so much!
Excellent, thanks!
Is it possible to split the line into two independent path in order to use two different instruments ? So two inputs and outputs
I've not tried it, but in theory yes. Just have 2 completely independent paths.
Thank you for this, glad I subbed!!
You're welcome. :-)
Super helpful, thanks !
No worries. Glad it helped.
Thank you so much! That is so helpful!
You're welcome 😊.