Alright friendly folk who stumbled upon this video in the middle of the night, could I get your thoughts on my other channel? Looking for feedback, good bad or otherwise. Video below. th-cam.com/video/qo3ZiUTWx6I/w-d-xo.html
@@SuperZoomVideos While you were there, were you able to do roughly the same observation but from a high nearby location? If so, I'd be interested to see that as well.
let's say SuperZoom is filming on a tripod 10feet tall in Whangapoua new Zealand. And he is filming repanga island. It's 20.3 miles of distance. What I was looking for was how much of the island would we see drop off due to the Earth's curvature. But there isn't a formal for this. The tallest point of the island is 214m and the right hand side of that island from the filming location is 105m or 344fet. If you could help with finding the right hight for the visibility drop off at 20.3 Miles that be so awesome!
At 10 feet above the water the drop would be 182 feet (55.4 m). However I'm still fairly certain that SuperZoom is just holding the camera in his hands
@@javierlatorre480 No, not at all. He's not keeping the camera steady AT ALL. When you think you see through that gobbly gook and see some bridge, it only disappears because he brings the camera down more. You know this, because there's much more water in the view than when it was spotted. Elsewise, you're claiming the "curve" is moving on the same zoom. This is just a cheap trick. You'll also notice how he never brings the camera as far up as he had it before, because that would show the bridge again. So cheap. Now maybe you ought to look at the percentage of water being used in the shot as I described, and be amazed? In any event, this is a joke because he appears to be filming it off some boat, and yet you need a steady surface (known as beach) to be totally consistent. A rougher sea will make this more of a problem too, especially at max zoom.
@@charles2241 Tilting the camera isn't gonna cut off his line of sight, especially not if Earth is flat. The landmasses don't appear to move IN the water when this happens. The entire point is that the bridge is not visible, because Earth is round. If you can find me a single frame where the bridge is visible when he is filming the island, then please send me the timestamp. Also, 0:36 and 2:45 he IS standing on the beach, dude. Did you not watch the video? Edit: He was keeping the camera extremely steady, it's just that every little imperfection is gonna be noticeable at what appears to be over 100x zoom
If the Earth is 24,000 miles in circumference then that means that the curvature is eight inches per mile squared by the distance. So this is basically 20 miles out. The shoreline should be 524 feet below the line of site. 524 feet of curvature from point A to point B. It is 262 feet of curvature if in the middle to each side between point A and point B this island should not be in view of the earth was a ball 24,000 miles in circumference
This post has several issues: a) Curvature is not 8 inches per mile squared, this describes a parabola, not a sphere b) I don't know how you even used the formula but it did not give me 524 feet, it gave me 277 c) Using the actual formula (which also accounts for the height of the cameraman) the actual drop would be something like 203 feet d) The island is 702 feet tall so in none of these scenarios is it obscured e) You're using imperial instead of metric: 61.5 metres of drop for an island 214 metres tall
I am not sure how you did your math todeo todeo. But it wasn't correct. At 20 miles out, on an x y axis from point a to point b, there is around 267 feet of curve, but it's the middle point bulge which the height than exceeds that of the objects you see behind the bulge in furthest distance. And at the middle point, there is about 67 feet of bulge. So at ground level, you can see anything taller than 67 feet across 20 miles of water.
@@christianpaulroldan4010 A) His math is incorrect, which you would know if you read the posts or did some fact checking for yourself. B) Refraction is a property of fluids (inc gasses) and is always present. Only the amount varies.
@@luzie864 Minha prima se casou em Búzios em 2017. Putz grila man, que lugar incrível né?! Vocês cariocas são abençoados🙏 Grande abraço de Ribeirão Preto - SP🙌
@@luzie864 As montanhas que citei que dá pra ver de lá são: à esquerda ( Parque Estadual do Desengano, 185 km de distância ) e à direita ( Monumento Natural Serra das Torres, no Espírito Santo, 275 km de distância!!!) Cê acredita?!!rsrsr
@@ski9kThe right one is because it's below the horizon. Half way through he superimposed an image of the entire Island, you can see how far below the horizon the beach actually is.
@@christianpaulroldan4010 Then you mean you want to be able to reject explanations without using any intelligence or knowledge, How do you think you look? Hahaha. Your problem ia the question is so S$%&%&D, so it tells us about you. Things don't "disappear at a certain mile". This is curvature and so it all dependent on size, distance refraction and your height etc.
I don't think it 'dips below the horizon'. I think it's a combination of air pollution and heat haze that distorts the viewing. Water, including oceans, rivers seas etc, cannot bend. By definition, water always finds its own level. Without exception . . . Have a great day my friend! Great video!
@@mudzy9820 Gravity is a scientific theory, meaning it's a well studied collection of facts. Meanwhile, Flat Earth doesn't even count as a hypothesis. It's just a premise that doesn't fit reality
Repanga Island: Elevation 214 meters. Totally normal for a large portion of its mass to still be visible from 33 km. Thank you for demonstrating your ignorance.
@@melodicolatino Which would make sense only if the moon was a similar distance away as the mountain...but it's HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of miles away so...yeah.
@@breezybest6064 So... what? The angular size of the Moon is between 29'55'' and 33'28''. Everything can be calculated, all the data is perfectly available. You just need to know a bit about geometry. By the way, you can read the works of Copernicus, Kepler, etc. if you are actually interested in what it is like with all these distances, angular sizes, orbits, etc. People today just love to show off their ignorance.
Look up title nodes please. Education is a wonderful thing. Do you start with here is the math of the curvature and then prove it visually. Nope every globe believer runs from this. Math cowards.
@@traquemorrel1820 The missing land bridge was already taking up _most_ of the screen by the time the camera got to max zoom. How much more zoom do you need than that?
@Javier Latorre Exactly: FEs often try to use varying phenomena to explain a constant view. All because they were told to by a video. They have no clue.
@@SuperZoomVideos why do you never respond to the people stating the earth is flat? You know that there is exactly the amount of obstruction predicted by the globe. Is it because you like the ad revenue it brings in so you don't want to tell them that you totally disagree with their worldview?
@@CryptoRoast_0 I used to (not talking about the April fools SuperMooZ above) and very occasionally I still do but you learn as you go and I learnt that they usually fall under a category. - Trolls: In which case not worth my time or sanity, usually manage to misspell Earth 🤦🏼♂️ - Really believe it: conventional science and math go out the window, unless you have a rocket. Good luck and even then I’m not sure they would believe their own eyes - inbetweeners: I have managed to bring a few people back round but the opportunity is rare. There is bugger all ad revenue from this channel, i am lucky if I hit the threshold every second month, by not replying it does actually do algorithm damage so I’m defo not in for the cash. All in all my channel description is pretty clear on what this channel is not and if you watch the most recent cruise video I’m pretty blunt with the messaging without saying it outright.
Distancia hasta la isla 32.8 km, altura de la cámara 2 mts (aprox.), distancia al horizonte 5,05 kms (según calculadora de curvatura), la isla debería estar oculta 60,4 mts tras la curvatura de la tierra. Pero el faro está a una altura de 105 mts sobre el nivel del mar, eso significa que deberían verse solo 44,6 mts de tierra bajo el faro, pero se vé casi todo. Algo no cuadra aquí. Hay que considerar tambien que la humedad en el aire refracta la luz hacia abajo, por lo tanto, se debería ver menos aún, pero pasa lo contrario. A decir verdad, esta observación es más explicable en una tierra plana.
Ao contrário de sua crença, a refração permite vermos mais de alguma coisa, e não menos. Como não é possível observar a praia distante, a única observação possível é que a terra não é plana, é esférica.
No es explicable para nada por una tierra plana, porque en una tierra plana, podrías ver las playas de la isla, el 100% del tiempo. Comparando la forma de la isla con el modelo en Google Earth, está ocultada alrededor de 45 metros bajo el horizonte. No se ve "casi todo". Puede que los 15 metros restantes hayan sido levantados por a refracción atmosférica.
@@traquemorrel1820 Sí, la refracción puede hacer eso, y lo hace. Diferentes condiciones atmosféricas crean diferentes índices de refracción. La curvatura no es "supuesta", es real. Podrás observarlo en retransmisiones en directo desde la ISS, fotografías de satélite, etc. Incluso aquí, desde tierra, se puede ver cómo los barcos parecen "hundirse" bajo el horizonte. Mientras que el planeta plano imaginario nunca logró proporcionar una explicación real de la existencia de los días y las noches, el planeta esférico en rotación proporciona una explicación simple y realista.
32.82 km (20.39 miles), with a drop of 61.66 metres (202.3 feet) if we assume the cameraman to be 1.8 metres (6 foot). Not enough to obscure the whole island, which is 214 metres (702 feet) tall at its highest peak, but just enough to hide that land bridge between the big peak and small peak
Wait for the sun to set when focused on the bridge. Wait for car to go on it with their lights on. Looks like a car might have been reflecting sunlight right when the shot is frozen. Iv measured Earth so I know it's flat. Keep trying and you'll get the bridge. It's just hidden by a thick atmosphere. Thanks for the video! 🙏
How have you measured the earth? Do tell haha. The bridge is clearly hidden by water, hmm that must mean there is a drop off right? No cant be, will have to think of some more bs to support my belief
I feel bad for you bud. You just tried to make a harmless channel showing how far some cameras can zoom and flat earthers just started infecting your channel.
Nah mate, pays my power bill. You get used to it after a while and some of them aren’t terrible people. If you can avoid the topic they can be good banter.
at 20 mile on a ball earth not only would you not be able to see that land bridge but you would not be able to see that land period.. you just proved that the earth is flat.
I'm desperately seeking evidence that earth is flat but this isn't it. Unless I see the shoreline of the landmass, this doesnt prove flat earth. I cant determine how much of the land mass being zoomed in on is below the horizon. One good test would be to show that the horizon distance is further behind the landmass being used as the target. This way we know for sure that we are seeing the full height of the landmass. Same can apply for boats being used as the target.
@@SuperZoomVideos I know it is. But FEs do make some interesting arguments and its interesting. That's never made me change my mind though. However, I have always doubted what our moon is. Theres a deep mystery behind it and it multi faceted. Recently I saw proof that of you take a photo of the moon and do a negative exposure to the photo and then horizontally flip it, you can see a reflection of the earth; contenants and seas. In addition there are continents that we dont know about. This is undeniable and I agree with the conclusions. Many FEs dont even know about this. However, it does lend credibility that the earth may not be what we think it is either. So as a totally objective truth seeker, I'm looking for evidence that leaves no room for doubt, if someone can prove the earth is round. If it is flat, which I'm sure it's not, it opens up another rabbit hole which I hope not to go down but I will if I can be convinced. This video here doesnt prove its round. As.of now I cant imagine a flat earth being the valid answer. But I remain objective. Just want to make sure I'm understood as to where I stand :)
Unfortunately I’ve become somewhat embroiled in this world by no choice of my own but I keep these things in mind. 1, Governments are crap at lying to people, most already have pretty tight control on their populations so why they would choose this hill to die on is kinda pointless. 2, The FE community tend to use a different version of science when trying to make points so making any comparison is hopeless 3, I work for an airline so this stuff kinda needs to be accurate to get planes where they need to go with enough fuel. 4, I’ve seen enough shorelines vanish and reappear with a bit of height to be positive it’s not flat. 5, Branson
@@Machine9000 hi brother .. can you give link of such photos . I learn from ancient sanskrit sources that Moon is reflection of the earth . I too thought that it is reflection of " real " Antarctica . Would love to try those photos
@@SuperZoomVideos yeah it's round like a bowl, but not a ball. You work for airlines, huh? So how do planes fly? Do they fly dead level or does the pilot keep dipping the nose down?
@@dpackman It really doesn't. On a Flat Earth you can't have a setting Sun and time zones at the same time. Any hypothetical Flat Earth has to sacrifice one or the other. Keep sunsets? Now everywhere on Earth experiences the exact same day at the exact same time. Keep time zones? Having the Sun always shining on SOME part of the Flat Earth's surface ends up requiring it to stay overhead forever, meaning it would never set below the horizon.
Just as expected in the globe model, from an apparent 2 meter evelation camera at the beach, at 32.8Km distance, the hidden part should be 60.4 meters, since the island has 214 meters of elevation, we can see the top 153.6 meters of the island, showing the curvature 👍
Distancia hasta la isla 32.8 km, altura de la cámara 2 mts (aprox.), distancia al horizonte 5,05 kms (según calculadora de curvatura), la isla debería estar oculta 60,4 mts tras la curvatura de la tierra. Pero el faro está a una altura de 105 mts sobre el nivel del mar, eso significa que debería verse solo 44,6 mts de tierra bajo el faro, pero se vé casi todo. Algo no cuadra aquí. Hay que considerar tambien que la humedad en el aire refracta la luz hacia abajo, por lo tanto, se debería ver menos aún, pero pasa lo contrario. A decir verdad, esta observación es más explicable en una tierra plana.
That bridge didnt dips that much on that distance. . 😂😂. That island should be invisible if earth really is a globe. I can accept that its curve but not a globe. Flat earth with a lil bit curve, yeah acceptable. . Im not that strict 😂😂
@@SMHman666 I mean, I got here BECAUSE a Flat Earther sent me this video, plus another one from the same channel that ALSO showed curvature. I pointed this out and they didn't even acknowledge it.
You could send a flat earther up into space and have him look at the curvature. The first thing he would say if that the CGI isn't even that good, or it just looks curved because his eyeball is curved. There is literally no way you can change their minds.
Or I could comment that Rob Skiba Herman Cain'd himself by going antivaxxer as well as flat Earther. In all seriousness, though, the atmosphere can't cause drop, only diminish it
So ? is missing aaprox 3-4 meters due to the unclear atmosphere, should be missing 80 metters from this distance. the highest point is 214. you just prove it that is flat water level again. guys you always are loosing.
Nope. It'd only be flat water if you could see the bridge AND the beaches (which you can't). It isn't because of "unclear atmosphere", especially since atmospheric refraction will typically _lift_ rather than sink. I can confirm through Google Earth that the island has dipped at least 45 metres. The missing 15 m can be attributed to refraction.
@@javierlatorre480 You can use zoom lenses to view objects that are so distant from you that they should be obscured do to curvature. Therefore, the mathematics of mainstream spherical geometry used to describe Earth is clearly wrong.
@@wolfbbq6076 The fact that one can view distant objects that should be obscured by curvature makes the spherical geometry of the ball earthers a spurious claim, or "flerf" claim in your parlance. Not ridiculous. Readily obvious.
please stop with huge zooms. please make some zooms on distances we can see some details without atmospheric blur. like zooms of 500m to 1k"m. seeing blurred mountains 40 kilometers away is kinda missing the utility of the zoom and boring...
@@javierlatorre480 that gap your talking about in the Repanga Island is not 160 feet. It seems to me if the camera would keep zooming you would see the sands on the other side. And I say that because look how much visibility is gained once he starts zooming you can't even see the half of the right side of the island till the lens brings it into your veiw
@@danielheffelfinger Zooming doesn't lift the island out of the water, it just makes what's already visible bigger. So just because the camera couldn't resolve the smaller peak at first (something which the cameraman could probably see just fine with the naked eye) doesn't mean it can pull the bridge into view when it's very much below the horizon line
@@javierlatorre480 look the right hand side of the island is 105m /344 feet tall. The distance we are both watching is supposed to have 160 feet of drop of viability due to curvature. And all I'm saying is I see more then I'm supposed to when you do the math. Yeah I get it the world isnt supposed to be flat but I do know that math is supposed to always be accurate.
@@JudaismIslamUnited Do the math yourself. 32.8km is 20.3809751054mi. 20.3809751054mi multiplied by 8 inches (they said it was 8 inches per mile) is 163.0478008432 inches. 163.0478008432 inches divided by 12 inches is 13.5873167369 feet. Where the lighthouse is on the right is 340ft. I think that person may be talking about the sight level adjustment of an object, which is something completely different and irrelevant in this situation. That figure comes out to 277ft. So maybe that's what theyre using.
We live on a flat stationary earth that God created. Guys, open your eyes and see the truth, the leaders want to brainwash you and blind you and they want you to get away from God. Open your eyes, open your heart. God the Lord sent His one and only Son Jesus Christ to die for you so you can be forgiven. John 3:16-21
@@javierlatorre480 You have a lot to learn. You are new to this. Keep researching with an open mind and try to think critically every day, not just about this but about everything. Research this, and eventually you will find a lot of things, have a wonderful day!
@@senbon751 I've been on the the topic of flat Earth for well over a year AND I am currently studying astrophysics. I've DONE the research, and it doesn't take a genius to tell that Earth is not flat. Anyone claiming otherwise is either lying or stupid. Which one are you?
This a proof that the Earth is flat. NASA says each mile has an 8-inch curve. Calculate the height of the island from sea level and do the math. Should we see it 33 km away?
Here's proof that you have flat brain. We literally saw that the island dipped below the horizon meanwhile in the fact the curve was 4m towards. And the distance between the person to other Island is 33 km. If you actually do simple math but you didn't because you don't know how to. And in the fact. 33 km away isn't enough to see curve on horizon. In order to see curve on horizon you have to be at 35k feet up. And with clean view. And halleujah, there you go. The reason that you don't see curve while standing on ground because the size of Earth is FUCKING 510 100 000 km². There you go :)
@@mikewolf6012 according to that Neil guy at NASA in one interview he stated that the earth's curvature can only be seen from120000ft...you say 35k feet...you both can't be right...
@@jasonwildey8885 Hmm. I haven't seen the video yet, so I can't understand of what you are talking about. As far as from original source, you can start seeing curvature when you are at 35k feet high. So, as far as it seems like that he meant that you can see more curvature while you are at 120k feet. Sent video link towards to that Neil interview said about that the Earth's curvature can only be seen from 120k feet high to me. I would like to see that video, please and thank you :).
How did you bring that land over the curve if it's a real curve? The curve is fake & you just proved it with your cool zoom camera. I want that camera to do my own experiments to prove further what I know. Make my own flat earth truth videos.
The land was tall enough for a lot of it to stil be visible over the curve, but not all of it. You notice how the guy zoomed in on a piece that WASN'T above the horizon?
The most simple and so best thing to film is just a sunset, and you don't need a super zoom camera for that. Just put a filter on the camera, so that you see the sharp contour of the sun, and not some overshine effects. - if the sun keeps its size and goes down behind the horizon, the globers are right - if the sun becomes smaller and smaller, until you cannot see it anymore in the vanishing point, the flat earthers are right
Alright friendly folk who stumbled upon this video in the middle of the night, could I get your thoughts on my other channel? Looking for feedback, good bad or otherwise. Video below.
th-cam.com/video/qo3ZiUTWx6I/w-d-xo.html
I just want to ask is that the highest zoomer of a nikon camera?
@duzcukatili If only all of that information was readily available somewhere *cough* description *cough*
Nice that we can observe that the connection between the two parts of the island is obscured by the ~0.3 degrees of curvature.
*fist bump*
do it early in the morning just after sunrise so you will get less atmospheric distortion due to water evaporating
Tried that the other day, mirage was even worse. Only way around it is to get up high in these parts it seems.
@@SuperZoomVideos interesting
@@SuperZoomVideos While you were there, were you able to do roughly the same observation but from a high nearby location? If so, I'd be interested to see that as well.
@@toosas very interesting indeed
Главное чтобы был штиль
let's say SuperZoom is filming on a tripod 10feet tall in Whangapoua new Zealand. And he is filming repanga island. It's 20.3 miles of distance. What I was looking for was how much of the island would we see drop off due to the Earth's curvature. But there isn't a formal for this. The tallest point of the island is 214m and the right hand side of that island from the filming location is 105m or 344fet. If you could help with finding the right hight for the visibility drop off at 20.3 Miles that be so awesome!
At 10 feet above the water the drop would be 182 feet (55.4 m). However I'm still fairly certain that SuperZoom is just holding the camera in his hands
FLAT EARTH 100%.
Not even close. Pay close attention at 1:20 and be amazed
Yep 100% proof.., if there was a bend in the water/world you’d be able to see it from the side angle. End of. Fuck off globe retards
@@javierlatorre480 No, not at all. He's not keeping the camera steady AT ALL. When you think you see through that gobbly gook and see some bridge, it only disappears because he brings the camera down more. You know this, because there's much more water in the view than when it was spotted. Elsewise, you're claiming the "curve" is moving on the same zoom. This is just a cheap trick. You'll also notice how he never brings the camera as far up as he had it before, because that would show the bridge again. So cheap. Now maybe you ought to look at the percentage of water being used in the shot as I described, and be amazed? In any event, this is a joke because he appears to be filming it off some boat, and yet you need a steady surface (known as beach) to be totally consistent. A rougher sea will make this more of a problem too, especially at max zoom.
@@charles2241 Tilting the camera isn't gonna cut off his line of sight, especially not if Earth is flat. The landmasses don't appear to move IN the water when this happens.
The entire point is that the bridge is not visible, because Earth is round. If you can find me a single frame where the bridge is visible when he is filming the island, then please send me the timestamp.
Also, 0:36 and 2:45 he IS standing on the beach, dude. Did you not watch the video?
Edit: He was keeping the camera extremely steady, it's just that every little imperfection is gonna be noticeable at what appears to be over 100x zoom
Moo 🐄
I really like this channel. It is so informative and makes me want to go on a vacation. We live in a beautiful realm.
Travel is one of the most important things anyone can do, really encourage you to get out there even if it’s local.
If the Earth is 24,000 miles in circumference then that means that the curvature is eight inches per mile squared by the distance. So this is basically 20 miles out. The shoreline should be 524 feet below the line of site. 524 feet of curvature from point A to point B. It is 262 feet of curvature if in the middle to each side between point A and point B this island should not be in view of the earth was a ball 24,000 miles in circumference
This post has several issues:
a) Curvature is not 8 inches per mile squared, this describes a parabola, not a sphere
b) I don't know how you even used the formula but it did not give me 524 feet, it gave me 277
c) Using the actual formula (which also accounts for the height of the cameraman) the actual drop would be something like 203 feet
d) The island is 702 feet tall so in none of these scenarios is it obscured
e) You're using imperial instead of metric: 61.5 metres of drop for an island 214 metres tall
I am not sure how you did your math todeo todeo. But it wasn't correct. At 20 miles out, on an x y axis from point a to point b, there is around 267 feet of curve, but it's the middle point bulge which the height than exceeds that of the objects you see behind the bulge in furthest distance. And at the middle point, there is about 67 feet of bulge. So at ground level, you can see anything taller than 67 feet across 20 miles of water.
Moo 🐄
But they would never accept that. They always push that refraction thing. Yeah it exist but use it to everything? Nah
@@christianpaulroldan4010
A) His math is incorrect, which you would know if you read the posts or did some fact checking for yourself.
B) Refraction is a property of fluids (inc gasses) and is always present. Only the amount varies.
Here in Brasil at Turtles Beach at Buzios - RJ you can see a mountain that is more than (275 km away) on naked eye
Buzios era o meu Lugar favorito para longos fins de semanas fora do Rio! 🙏🙌✨🕊️
@@luzie864 Minha prima se casou em Búzios em 2017. Putz grila man, que lugar incrível né?! Vocês cariocas são abençoados🙏
Grande abraço de Ribeirão Preto - SP🙌
@@luzie864 As montanhas que citei que dá pra ver de lá são: à esquerda ( Parque Estadual do Desengano, 185 km de distância ) e à direita ( Monumento Natural Serra das Torres, no Espírito Santo, 275 km de distância!!!) Cê acredita?!!rsrsr
Prove it.
Could you perhaps post a photo of this phenomenon to your Community tab?
That would be great. 👍
I bet the freemasons don't like this camera ;))
Moo 🐄
Wait a second - why cant I see the beach on that island????
Because the zoom is at max
2 responses to my question. .... Which sounds correct?
@@ski9kThe right one is because it's below the horizon. Half way through he superimposed an image of the entire Island, you can see how far below the horizon the beach actually is.
Are we sure it's not because the "zoom is at max"? Lol
They said on a certain miles something will disappear. . But what is this? Which mile should that be?
Why not try to learn? Do you not like to know things for yourself?
@@Magnum-Farce i want to know it from you guys. .
@@christianpaulroldan4010 Then you mean you want to be able to reject explanations without using any intelligence or knowledge,
How do you think you look? Hahaha.
Your problem ia the question is so S$%&%&D, so it tells us about you.
Things don't "disappear at a certain mile". This is curvature and so it all dependent on size, distance refraction and your height etc.
I don't think it 'dips below the horizon'. I think it's a combination of air pollution and heat haze that distorts the viewing. Water, including oceans, rivers seas etc, cannot bend. By definition, water always finds its own level. Without exception . . . Have a great day my friend! Great video!
Stay safe and healthy my friend! 😃
oh dear.. lol
Yes as the earth is a sphere and gravity acts inward , water wraps around earth
@@swaran88 so you are led to believe, gravity is just another theory like flat earth lol
@@mudzy9820 Gravity is a scientific theory, meaning it's a well studied collection of facts.
Meanwhile, Flat Earth doesn't even count as a hypothesis. It's just a premise that doesn't fit reality
we can zoom very long but there is no clarity . how much distance can we focus with nikon coolpix 1000?
Nice work .. it's indeed flatearth
Moo 🐄
FEs can't logic.
It is just 32 km, it can't proof that
@@astralalaa at this distance there should be a drop of 12 1/2 feet.. atleast. On a clear day you would be able to see the shore
@@MrPmsavage001 actually there should be a drop of 266 feet.
Repanga Island: Elevation 214 meters. Totally normal for a large portion of its mass to still be visible from 33 km. Thank you for demonstrating your ignorance.
I’m not sure who that comment is aimed at but we are on the same team buddy
@@SuperZoomVideos Got it 👍 Got mislead by the title
@@argentum001 which part of the mountain isn't visible because of the water mirage versus the curvature?
@@multispeciesangler About 45 metres of the island isn't visible. Curvature calculators predict a drop of 60 metres when not including refraction.
Just love your observations! Its awesome
Glad you like them!
@@SuperZoomVideos he thinks your video proves a flat earth.
@@nasanchez964 the name sort of gave that away
@@nasanchez964 He would think his y fronts prove a flat earth. None of them have any brains.
Feckless simpleton.
No curve?
no
Yes
@@00vTv00 ni rastro
I wonder why the moon can be seen so close, but the mountain, which is many times closer, is so far away ?
Because the moon is way way way way way way way way way way bigger than the mountains. Try to see moon's mountains and compare.
@@melodicolatino Which would make sense only if the moon was a similar distance away as the mountain...but it's HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of miles away so...yeah.
@@breezybest6064 So... what? The angular size of the Moon is between 29'55'' and 33'28''. Everything can be calculated, all the data is perfectly available. You just need to know a bit about geometry. By the way, you can read the works of Copernicus, Kepler, etc. if you are actually interested in what it is like with all these distances, angular sizes, orbits, etc. People today just love to show off their ignorance.
“These are small. Those are far away”
Also looking thru thick atmosphere is different than looking up. You can observe when moon or sun rises
It’s a wonderful wonderful video.... please tell me whether this is just optical zoom or adding of digital zoom too...
It’s a combination of, I break them down in some of my other videos but the optical is still massive
@@SuperZoomVideos really awesome... thanks 👍
If the earth was flat you’d be able to see the waves washing up on the shore…..
Look up title nodes please. Education is a wonderful thing. Do you start with here is the math of the curvature and then prove it visually. Nope every globe believer runs from this. Math cowards.
@@clarkpalmer840 title nodes? earth curves 1 degree every 110 km , not hard .
you cant even explain sunsets on a flat earth ,joke model .
@@jennamurphy9614 with more zoom you could see it
@@traquemorrel1820 The missing land bridge was already taking up _most_ of the screen by the time the camera got to max zoom. How much more zoom do you need than that?
Oceanic waters have swells/waves. One of several reasons why you are not able to see the land bridge or past the horizon
100% waves do not help. Pretty hard to get a flat day round these parts as well.
It's pretty impressive that this supposed swell stays still just to keep up the illusion, must be paid by the US government 13 778 km away
@@javierlatorre480 20 mill+ plus a year to report this from half way around the world, but shhhh don’t tell anyone
@Javier Latorre Exactly: FEs often try to use varying phenomena to explain a constant view. All because they were told to by a video. They have no clue.
Can you test zoom on bridge Pontchartrain, please
In Louisiana?………it’s a little out of the way. I don’t think I’m in the right “New”
So the earth is flat? 🤯
Yes
How do you look at this video and think Earth is flat?
Moo 🐄
@@SuperZoomVideos why do you never respond to the people stating the earth is flat? You know that there is exactly the amount of obstruction predicted by the globe. Is it because you like the ad revenue it brings in so you don't want to tell them that you totally disagree with their worldview?
@@CryptoRoast_0 I used to (not talking about the April fools SuperMooZ above) and very occasionally I still do but you learn as you go and I learnt that they usually fall under a category.
- Trolls: In which case not worth my time or sanity, usually manage to misspell Earth 🤦🏼♂️
- Really believe it: conventional science and math go out the window, unless you have a rocket. Good luck and even then I’m not sure they would believe their own eyes
- inbetweeners: I have managed to bring a few people back round but the opportunity is rare.
There is bugger all ad revenue from this channel, i am lucky if I hit the threshold every second month, by not replying it does actually do algorithm damage so I’m defo not in for the cash. All in all my channel description is pretty clear on what this channel is not and if you watch the most recent cruise video I’m pretty blunt with the messaging without saying it outright.
Distancia hasta la isla 32.8 km, altura de la cámara 2 mts (aprox.), distancia al horizonte 5,05 kms (según calculadora de curvatura), la isla debería estar oculta 60,4 mts tras la curvatura de la tierra. Pero el faro está a una altura de 105 mts sobre el nivel del mar, eso significa que deberían verse solo 44,6 mts de tierra bajo el faro, pero se vé casi todo. Algo no cuadra aquí. Hay que considerar tambien que la humedad en el aire refracta la luz hacia abajo, por lo tanto, se debería ver menos aún, pero pasa lo contrario. A decir verdad, esta observación es más explicable en una tierra plana.
Ao contrário de sua crença, a refração permite vermos mais de alguma coisa, e não menos. Como não é possível observar a praia distante, a única observação possível é que a terra não é plana, é esférica.
And relative humidity has a small effect on air density, and small effect on refraction.
No es explicable para nada por una tierra plana, porque en una tierra plana, podrías ver las playas de la isla, el 100% del tiempo.
Comparando la forma de la isla con el modelo en Google Earth, está ocultada alrededor de 45 metros bajo el horizonte. No se ve "casi todo". Puede que los 15 metros restantes hayan sido levantados por a refracción atmosférica.
@@VivekanandaKFla refracción no puede mostrar nada que esté oculto detrás de una supuesta curvatura
@@traquemorrel1820 Sí, la refracción puede hacer eso, y lo hace. Diferentes condiciones atmosféricas crean diferentes índices de refracción. La curvatura no es "supuesta", es real. Podrás observarlo en retransmisiones en directo desde la ISS, fotografías de satélite, etc. Incluso aquí, desde tierra, se puede ver cómo los barcos parecen "hundirse" bajo el horizonte. Mientras que el planeta plano imaginario nunca logró proporcionar una explicación real de la existencia de los días y las noches, el planeta esférico en rotación proporciona una explicación simple y realista.
Just asking how much curvature should there be for the 35 mile shot ?
This is km, not miles. 35 km is 21 mi and change. There should be over 294 feet of curvature. As we can see, there ain't.
@@bonebrothbro true just pointing out facts. YT is on a mission to delete anything that questions the spinning ball
@@JudaismIslamUnited 100% bro be careful
@@mudzy9820 careful of what?
If they don't want me to post they know.
32.82 km (20.39 miles), with a drop of 61.66 metres (202.3 feet) if we assume the cameraman to be 1.8 metres (6 foot). Not enough to obscure the whole island, which is 214 metres (702 feet) tall at its highest peak, but just enough to hide that land bridge between the big peak and small peak
Wait for the sun to set when focused on the bridge. Wait for car to go on it with their lights on. Looks like a car might have been reflecting sunlight right when the shot is frozen. Iv measured Earth so I know it's flat. Keep trying and you'll get the bridge. It's just hidden by a thick atmosphere. Thanks for the video! 🙏
Or if you know someone who can get on the bridge with a mirror...
How have you measured the earth? Do tell haha. The bridge is clearly hidden by water, hmm that must mean there is a drop off right? No cant be, will have to think of some more bs to support my belief
Explain yourself.. lol
Oh jesus, what a fool.
More likely that was bird, considering how high up that teeny tiny white pinprick is and how it was moving before the video paused
Yip definitely a sphere. Flat earth destroyed once again.
Quiet this week, usually they would have set upon you by now.
@@SuperZoomVideos Lol, it would be like being savaged by a dead fish!
Very good my friend
I enjoyed watching the video
.
Thankyou Shemi, I appreciate you watching 😀
Very good mate
Keep it up
Cheers Bumedian! Taking a break soon but always love the encouragement
@@SuperZoomVideos
Amazing work you are doing brother.
Awesome footage
Cheers mate, what sort of ham are you?
@@SuperZoomVideos A special kind of ham.
Moo... I mean, wow, its giving me time to hit the beach vibes.
I really did myself in with that. Keep forgetting why people moo at me and it’s my own fault 😂
Very interesting to look 😉👍
Thanks Artur! 😁👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
I feel bad for you bud. You just tried to make a harmless channel showing how far some cameras can zoom and flat earthers just started infecting your channel.
Nah mate, pays my power bill. You get used to it after a while and some of them aren’t terrible people. If you can avoid the topic they can be good banter.
Great job thanks for sharing cheers
And as usual thanks for stopping in Mr Drones UK
Wow top vidio top camera
Cheers Garangan!
at 20 mile on a ball earth not only would you not be able to see that land bridge but you would not be able to see that land period.. you just proved that the earth is flat.
Why? Show us math you did for this
The land bridge isn't visible so your point falls flat.
Also your maths is wrong.
Zoom starts at 0:50
Not wrong
I'm desperately seeking evidence that earth is flat but this isn't it. Unless I see the shoreline of the landmass, this doesnt prove flat earth. I cant determine how much of the land mass being zoomed in on is below the horizon.
One good test would be to show that the horizon distance is further behind the landmass being used as the target. This way we know for sure that we are seeing the full height of the landmass. Same can apply for boats being used as the target.
Its round buddy.
@@SuperZoomVideos I know it is. But FEs do make some interesting arguments and its interesting. That's never made me change my mind though. However, I have always doubted what our moon is. Theres a deep mystery behind it and it multi faceted. Recently I saw proof that of you take a photo of the moon and do a negative exposure to the photo and then horizontally flip it, you can see a reflection of the earth; contenants and seas. In addition there are continents that we dont know about. This is undeniable and I agree with the conclusions. Many FEs dont even know about this. However, it does lend credibility that the earth may not be what we think it is either. So as a totally objective truth seeker, I'm looking for evidence that leaves no room for doubt, if someone can prove the earth is round. If it is flat, which I'm sure it's not, it opens up another rabbit hole which I hope not to go down but I will if I can be convinced. This video here doesnt prove its round. As.of now I cant imagine a flat earth being the valid answer. But I remain objective. Just want to make sure I'm understood as to where I stand :)
Unfortunately I’ve become somewhat embroiled in this world by no choice of my own but I keep these things in mind.
1, Governments are crap at lying to people, most already have pretty tight control on their populations so why they would choose this hill to die on is kinda pointless.
2, The FE community tend to use a different version of science when trying to make points so making any comparison is hopeless
3, I work for an airline so this stuff kinda needs to be accurate to get planes where they need to go with enough fuel.
4, I’ve seen enough shorelines vanish and reappear with a bit of height to be positive it’s not flat.
5, Branson
@@Machine9000 hi brother .. can you give link of such photos . I learn from ancient sanskrit sources that Moon is reflection of the earth . I too thought that it is reflection of " real " Antarctica . Would love to try those photos
@@SuperZoomVideos yeah it's round like a bowl, but not a ball. You work for airlines, huh? So how do planes fly? Do they fly dead level or does the pilot keep dipping the nose down?
This video proves that my girlfriend's chest is flat 😢
That’s okay mate, just blow some more air in and chuck some duct tape over the leak. 😬
Don't complain miffed she let's you play with them.
Ты представляешь до каких размеров увеличиваются волны в объектив? Вот они и скрывают пол острова
can you zoom in on a sunset please in your next video thanks.
The sun rises, and the sun sets. The sun moves not earth. That alone debunks the big bang spinning globe masonic lies
@@dpackman It really doesn't. On a Flat Earth you can't have a setting Sun and time zones at the same time. Any hypothetical Flat Earth has to sacrifice one or the other.
Keep sunsets? Now everywhere on Earth experiences the exact same day at the exact same time.
Keep time zones? Having the Sun always shining on SOME part of the Flat Earth's surface ends up requiring it to stay overhead forever, meaning it would never set below the horizon.
Flat world
Nope
All around me familiar faces. Worn out places, worn out mooooo moo moo moooooo 🐄
@@SuperZoomVideos TFF
Nice🔥
Chur 🍪
Just as expected in the globe model, from an apparent 2 meter evelation camera at the beach, at 32.8Km distance, the hidden part should be 60.4 meters, since the island has 214 meters of elevation, we can see the top 153.6 meters of the island, showing the curvature 👍
Good man
A "curvatura" é 5 KM KKKKKKKKK
@@davimedina5165 incorreto
@@davimedina5165 Pra você, ser burro deve ser prazeroso
Distancia hasta la isla 32.8 km, altura de la cámara 2 mts (aprox.), distancia al horizonte 5,05 kms (según calculadora de curvatura), la isla debería estar oculta 60,4 mts tras la curvatura de la tierra. Pero el faro está a una altura de 105 mts sobre el nivel del mar, eso significa que debería verse solo 44,6 mts de tierra bajo el faro, pero se vé casi todo. Algo no cuadra aquí. Hay que considerar tambien que la humedad en el aire refracta la luz hacia abajo, por lo tanto, se debería ver menos aún, pero pasa lo contrario. A decir verdad, esta observación es más explicable en una tierra plana.
earth is a level surface and not a globe :)
It's both. Level doesn't mean flat in this case
@@javierlatorre480 lol. only a deluded glober could say such an idiotic thing.
Moo 🐄
@@JamesHawkeTH-cam And you, my friend, literally refused to look at the facts
That bridge didnt dips that much on that distance. . 😂😂. That island should be invisible if earth really is a globe. I can accept that its curve but not a globe. Flat earth with a lil bit curve, yeah acceptable. . Im not that strict 😂😂
Island is 214m high. Lower 60m of island is hidden. You're new to this "thinking" deal, aren't you.
Must be pain in the ass for flat-earthers.
You would think so but……..
On the contrary, it seems they filtered out the part that shows curvature and are claiming it proves their point
@@javierlatorre480 Yeah, they just see what they want to see and blatantly ignore anything that scuttles their "proof". Denial can be very powerful.
@@SMHman666 I mean, I got here BECAUSE a Flat Earther sent me this video, plus another one from the same channel that ALSO showed curvature. I pointed this out and they didn't even acknowledge it.
You could send a flat earther up into space and have him look at the curvature. The first thing he would say if that the CGI isn't even that good, or it just looks curved because his eyeball is curved. There is literally no way you can change their minds.
Haha the perfect video for flat earthers, “not Covid truthers”.
flat earth is proof of covid
Moo 🐄
Визуально кажется,что тут нет 33 км.
More zoom, please
I don’t know if I want someone with your profile pic having more zoom 🤔
@@SuperZoomVideos don't you like George Orwell?
Are you the big brother or the everyone else in this scenario?
@@SuperZoomVideos I'm Winston
FLAT EARTH, of course
Research lensing effect by Rob Skiba
I may be wrong but i think it's spelled Skiba
@@sarahouck7078 You are right.
Or I could comment that Rob Skiba Herman Cain'd himself by going antivaxxer as well as flat Earther.
In all seriousness, though, the atmosphere can't cause drop, only diminish it
Moo 🐄
Cool
Thanks Baby blue
Shows curve. If u see “missing curvature” learn about how light follows the curve close to sea level due to humidity over the surface
Woah woah, are you trying to teach these guys science. Good luck 😂
So ?
is missing aaprox 3-4 meters due to the unclear atmosphere, should be missing 80 metters from this distance.
the highest point is 214.
you just prove it that is flat water level again.
guys you always are loosing.
Nope. It'd only be flat water if you could see the bridge AND the beaches (which you can't). It isn't because of "unclear atmosphere", especially since atmospheric refraction will typically _lift_ rather than sink.
I can confirm through Google Earth that the island has dipped at least 45 metres. The missing 15 m can be attributed to refraction.
globe earth 1 flat earth-10000000000000000
Moo 🐄
The Earth is flat end of story
Bait
The Earth is flat.
No
Moo 🐄
Flat earth or globe
I vote globe
is flat!
Flat..
flat...
LeVeL
A reflection of light 😂 Not really
Love hearing ball earthers grasp at straws and literally deny math and obvious proof.
Like you have any proof of your ridiculous flerf claim.
What maths are being denied?
@@javierlatorre480 You can use zoom lenses to view objects that are so distant from you that they should be obscured do to curvature. Therefore, the mathematics of mainstream spherical geometry used to describe Earth is clearly wrong.
@@wolfbbq6076 The fact that one can view distant objects that should be obscured by curvature makes the spherical geometry of the ball earthers a spurious claim, or "flerf" claim in your parlance. Not ridiculous. Readily obvious.
@@seanrobinson6407 The video you are commenting under disproves your claim. Did you not watch it?
obviously you cant measure curvature with a camera , anyways this experiment confirms earth is flat
Elaborate:
@@javierlatorre480 penguins in antarctica
the p900 would have hit it out of the park
My eyes can see the moon though
Christ you must be my Nemesis
My kryptonite 😂 how’s it treating you
Even the bible says we live on a flat earth so the bible is a book of truth study it to show yourself approved by the most high.
Does it really? There are lots of Christians who believe in the standard globe earth.
🤣🤣🤣
Mind checking again, then checking again with reality?
Where describes the Bible the Flat Earth?
Moo 🐄
This map overlay is at a different angle of perspective, and not to scale. very lame attempt
I literally just took what google gave me 🤷🏼♂️ talk to them
please stop with huge zooms. please make some zooms on distances we can see some details without atmospheric blur. like zooms of 500m to 1k"m. seeing blurred mountains 40 kilometers away is kinda missing the utility of the zoom and boring...
I like to mix it up, a lot of viewers are on the other side of the equation.
digital zoom fail
There are a lot of flat earthers around the globe
😂🤣
Minus habens
Looks flat to me. I don't see where 160feet of visibility was lost over 20 miles
You mean you still see one continuous island rather than two totally disconnected peaks?
@@javierlatorre480 that gap your talking about in the Repanga Island is not 160 feet. It seems to me if the camera would keep zooming you would see the sands on the other side. And I say that because look how much visibility is gained once he starts zooming you can't even see the half of the right side of the island till the lens brings it into your veiw
@@danielheffelfinger Zooming doesn't lift the island out of the water, it just makes what's already visible bigger. So just because the camera couldn't resolve the smaller peak at first (something which the cameraman could probably see just fine with the naked eye) doesn't mean it can pull the bridge into view when it's very much below the horizon line
@@javierlatorre480 look the right hand side of the island is 105m /344 feet tall. The distance we are both watching is supposed to have 160 feet of drop of viability due to curvature. And all I'm saying is I see more then I'm supposed to when you do the math. Yeah I get it the world isnt supposed to be flat but I do know that math is supposed to always be accurate.
There is no bridge 9n that island only a few dirt roads
YOU JUST PROVED THE EARTH IS FLAT . REMEMBER YOU NEED 8 INCHES OF DROP PER MILE TO LIVE ON A BALL THATS 25000 MILES AT THE EQUATER
*Turns caps lock off* you okay buddy?
32km is about 20mi. That comes out to about 13ft. You dont think there's about 13ft being cut out down to the bottom of that land bridge?
@@skip6978 its very simple math . no its not 13 feet skip more like 260 feet give or take
So is it 250 feet or 13 feet ?
@@JudaismIslamUnited Do the math yourself.
32.8km is 20.3809751054mi.
20.3809751054mi multiplied by 8 inches (they said it was 8 inches per mile) is 163.0478008432 inches.
163.0478008432 inches divided by 12 inches is 13.5873167369 feet.
Where the lighthouse is on the right is 340ft.
I think that person may be talking about the sight level adjustment of an object, which is something completely different and irrelevant in this situation. That figure comes out to 277ft. So maybe that's what theyre using.
Height 2 m
Distance 32.8 km
60m under globe curvature.
But, The island is very clear
Earth is flat
Literally part of the island is obscured.
Are you blind
so the earth isn't a planet
Moo 🐄
"60m under globe curvature." Island is 214m high. Lower 60m of island is hidden, Einstein.
We live on a flat stationary earth that God created. Guys, open your eyes and see the truth, the leaders want to brainwash you and blind you and they want you to get away from God. Open your eyes, open your heart. God the Lord sent His one and only Son Jesus Christ to die for you so you can be forgiven. John 3:16-21
This video shows that Earth is not flat. Jesus is irrelevant to the topic
@@javierlatorre480 Hahahaha sure thing buddy. You can believe whatever you want, not my problem.
@@senbon751 It's kind of your problem because you haven't yet noticed that this video invalidates the idea that Earth is flat.
@@javierlatorre480 You have a lot to learn. You are new to this. Keep researching with an open mind and try to think critically every day, not just about this but about everything. Research this, and eventually you will find a lot of things, have a wonderful day!
@@senbon751 I've been on the the topic of flat Earth for well over a year AND I am currently studying astrophysics. I've DONE the research, and it doesn't take a genius to tell that Earth is not flat. Anyone claiming otherwise is either lying or stupid. Which one are you?
This a proof that the Earth is flat. NASA says each mile has an 8-inch curve. Calculate the height of the island from sea level and do the math. Should we see it 33 km away?
Here's proof that you have flat brain. We literally saw that the island dipped below the horizon meanwhile in the fact the curve was 4m towards. And the distance between the person to other Island is 33 km. If you actually do simple math but you didn't because you don't know how to. And in the fact. 33 km away isn't enough to see curve on horizon. In order to see curve on horizon you have to be at 35k feet up. And with clean view. And halleujah, there you go. The reason that you don't see curve while standing on ground because the size of Earth is FUCKING 510 100 000 km². There you go :)
No...
@@mikewolf6012 according to that Neil guy at NASA in one interview he stated that the earth's curvature can only be seen from120000ft...you say 35k feet...you both can't be right...
@@jasonwildey8885 Hmm. I haven't seen the video yet, so I can't understand of what you are talking about. As far as from original source, you can start seeing curvature when you are at 35k feet high. So, as far as it seems like that he meant that you can see more curvature while you are at 120k feet. Sent video link towards to that Neil interview said about that the Earth's curvature can only be seen from 120k feet high to me. I would like to see that video, please and thank you :).
@@mikewolf6012 it titled a conversation with dr Neil Degrassi Tyson...1hr 09 Min...it's at the 39minute mark
Tierra plana
Ni lejos
Esta Moo 🐄
How did you bring that land over the curve if it's a real curve? The curve is fake & you just proved it with your cool zoom camera. I want that camera to do my own experiments to prove further what I know. Make my own flat earth truth videos.
The land was tall enough for a lot of it to stil be visible over the curve, but not all of it. You notice how the guy zoomed in on a piece that WASN'T above the horizon?
The most simple and so best thing to film is just a sunset, and you don't need a super zoom camera for that. Just put a filter on the camera, so that you see the sharp contour of the sun, and not some overshine effects.
- if the sun keeps its size and goes down behind the horizon, the globers are right
- if the sun becomes smaller and smaller, until you cannot see it anymore in the vanishing point, the flat earthers are right
earth is flat,
Just love your observations! Its awesome
Cheers guys 😁 I do feel sometimes it is a bit of a one way system though.