There is a dialectical opposition between light and darkness, good and evil, Ahura Mazda and Ahriman. Zarathustra therefore spoke of three virtues: Good thoughts Good words Good deeds.
The Bee Gees are not the main antagonists' but a hand doing some of the work of Ahriman. Perhaps look to who purchases the burnt lands of Angels for clues. Review how they hoped to rebuild that area.
Videos like this are cheap, low effort content. Using AI voice to dictate a text to us is low effort. At least have more respect for the content and for the viewers by having a real person narrate it.
We strongly believe that each soul when following the dictates of their higher self brings into manifestation their own unique creativity and vision in service to others. Our production teams work , which is considerable , is given freely here, without compensation of any kind.
Yep, got half way through and got bugged by the consistency, like baby doll poo. Just even and mechanically proofed. Blocking channels leaning this way. Oh the irony of the content amnd the means of production!!!
Real materialism embraces diversity. The underpinnings of the specificity of each instance of existential being is matter according to the physicalist view. In short, it is a special case for Idealism. The real debate is not between matter and spirit as referred to in this video with its AI voice-over but between a totalistic world view which reduces everything to a single but exclusionary truth versus that which embraces the rich diversity of things. The adversary here is that which holds all things as incompatible to the singularity of this truth. All things are to be devalued in the face of this truth as all things are held as illusory. That which opposes the adversary embraces the richness of all things in their individual instances of existential being. The question posed in this contest of wills that battle for the human intellect is whether we honor our world which is in reality countless worlds nested within countless worlds or seek to reduce everything to a singular monolithic whole that contains nothing but itself. Do we live in a world of many selves and thus many identities or can we only acknowledge one single self and identity? Do we reside within an open system that embraces everything or a closed system which disallows everything but itself? Steiner does not pose an alternative; he offers no possibility of aufheben. Without the prospect of aufheben how then can we transcend (transzendenz)? Also in reply to jenathent4840 My response below keeps on disappearing. Perhaps it is not meant to be but here however I will place it in my original comment: Ah, but we may choose the one extreme which commands us to build upon reality through the arts. Therein lies the dialectic where transcendence within that which we construct becomes possible. It is not self transcendence as we remain as always as builders but the consequence of the momentum by what we build out from the rudiments of our given reality. The other extreme negates all of this leaving behind its course nothing but rubble. The choice is as always clear. Truth is not to be revered but to be lived and celebrated as our assigned task our aufgaben is that of homo faber (humanity as builder). The world which we build transcends us as it in turn transcends itself.
Because in this form, we can never have the middle we are forced to be one extreme or the other and for that reason we will never know peace on this realm of existence as we are feeding as a sacrifice to chaos our suffering
@@jenathent4840 Ah, but we may choose the one extreme which commands us to build upon reality through the arts. Therein lies the dialectic where transcendence within that which we construct becomes possible. It is not self transcendence as we remain as always as builders but the consequence of the momentum by what we build out from the rudiments of our given reality. The other extreme negates all of this leaving behind its course nothing but rubble. The choice is as always clear. Truth is not to be revered but to be lived and celebrated as our assigned task our aufgabe is that of homo faber (humanity as builders).
@@jenathent4840 Ah, but we may choose the one extreme which commands us to build upon reality through the arts. Therein lies the dialectic where transcendence within that which we construct becomes possible. It is not self transcendence as we remain as always as builders but the consequence of the momentum by what we build out from the rudiments of our given reality. The other extreme negates all of this leaving behind its course nothing but rubble. The choice is as always clear. Truth is not to be revered but to be lived and celebrated as our assigned task our aufgaben is that of homo faber (humanity as builder). The world which we build transcends us as it in turn transcends itself.
@@jenathent4840 Ah, but we may choose the one extreme which commands us to build upon reality through the arts. Therein lies the dialectic where transcendence within that which we construct becomes possible. It is not self transcendence as we remain as always as builders but the consequence of the momentum by what we build out from the rudiments of our given reality. The other extreme negates all of this leaving behind its course nothing but rubble. The choice is as always clear. Truth is not to be revered but to be lived and celebrated as our assigned task our aufgaben is that of homo faber (humanity as builder). The world which we build transcends us as it in turn transcends itself.
@jenathent4840 Ah, but we may choose the one extreme which commands us to build upon reality through the arts. Therein lies the dialectic where transcendence within that which we construct becomes possible. It is not self transcendence as we remain as always as builders but the consequence of the momentum by what we build out from the rudiments of our given reality. The other extreme negates all of this leaving behind its course nothing but rubble. The choice is as always clear. Truth is not to be revered but to be lived and celebrated as our assigned task our aufgaben is that of homo faber (humanity as builder). The world which we build transcends us as it in turn transcends itself.
There is a dialectical opposition between light and darkness, good and evil, Ahura Mazda and Ahriman. Zarathustra therefore spoke of three virtues: Good thoughts Good words Good deeds.
Blessed
Ahriman is here and his initials are BG..good presentation. Looking forward to the next one.
Bee Gees embodies ahrimanic influence and is only a hand that serves Ahriman.
Perhaps you are correct. 😞
The Bee Gees are not the main antagonists' but a hand doing some of the work of Ahriman. Perhaps look to who purchases the burnt lands of Angels for clues. Review how they hoped to rebuild that area.
Who is that?
Or perhaps BT
Videos like this are cheap, low effort content. Using AI voice to dictate a text to us is low effort. At least have more respect for the content and for the viewers by having a real person narrate it.
We strongly believe that each soul when following the dictates of their higher self brings into manifestation their own unique creativity and vision in service to others. Our production teams work , which is considerable , is given freely here, without compensation of any kind.
Yep, got half way through and got bugged by the consistency, like baby doll poo.
Just even and mechanically proofed.
Blocking channels leaning this way.
Oh the irony of the content amnd the means of production!!!
@@JG-ly2ijplease block !😊
So why are we shown a head of a Dummer elf in the thumbnail?
Ariman looks like Slow Joe Biden.
More like Muskrat.
Robert Powell
strait up schill
❤
Ahriman / Mithras
SAME
Just don't forget that Steiner was a terrible racist. Keep that in mind!
thank yall
WHY YOU THINK THE CHOOS ARE TEACHING TORAH OPENLY NOW
Where is this openly taught?
Real materialism embraces diversity. The underpinnings of the specificity of each instance of existential being is matter according to the physicalist view. In short, it is a special case for Idealism.
The real debate is not between matter and spirit as referred to in this video with its AI voice-over but between a totalistic world view which reduces everything to a single but exclusionary truth versus that which embraces the rich diversity of things. The adversary here is that which holds all things as incompatible to the singularity of this truth. All things are to be devalued in the face of this truth as all things are held as illusory. That which opposes the adversary embraces the richness of all things in their individual instances of existential being.
The question posed in this contest of wills that battle for the human intellect is whether we honor our world which is in reality countless worlds nested within countless worlds or seek to reduce everything to a singular monolithic whole that contains nothing but itself. Do we live in a world of many selves and thus many identities or can we only acknowledge one single self and identity? Do we reside within an open system that embraces everything or a closed system which disallows everything but itself?
Steiner does not pose an alternative; he offers no possibility of aufheben. Without the prospect of aufheben how then can we transcend (transzendenz)?
Also in reply to jenathent4840
My response below keeps on disappearing. Perhaps it is not meant to be but here however I will place it in my original comment:
Ah, but we may choose the one extreme which commands us to build upon reality through the arts. Therein lies the dialectic where transcendence within that which we construct becomes possible. It is not self transcendence as we remain as always as builders but the consequence of the momentum by what we build out from the rudiments of our given reality. The other extreme negates all of this leaving behind its course nothing but rubble. The choice is as always clear. Truth is not to be revered but to be lived and celebrated as our assigned task our aufgaben is that of homo faber (humanity as builder). The world which we build transcends us as it in turn transcends itself.
Because in this form, we can never have the middle we are forced to be one extreme or the other and for that reason we will never know peace on this realm of existence as we are feeding as a sacrifice to chaos our suffering
@@jenathent4840 Ah, but we may choose the one extreme which commands us to build upon reality through the arts. Therein lies the dialectic where transcendence within that which we construct becomes possible. It is not self transcendence as we remain as always as builders but the consequence of the momentum by what we build out from the rudiments of our given reality. The other extreme negates all of this leaving behind its course nothing but rubble. The choice is as always clear. Truth is not to be revered but to be lived and celebrated as our assigned task our aufgabe is that of homo faber (humanity as builders).
@@jenathent4840 Ah, but we may choose the one extreme which commands us to build upon reality through the arts. Therein lies the dialectic where transcendence within that which we construct becomes possible. It is not self transcendence as we remain as always as builders but the consequence of the momentum by what we build out from the rudiments of our given reality. The other extreme negates all of this leaving behind its course nothing but rubble. The choice is as always clear. Truth is not to be revered but to be lived and celebrated as our assigned task our aufgaben is that of homo faber (humanity as builder). The world which we build transcends us as it in turn transcends itself.
@@jenathent4840 Ah, but we may choose the one extreme which commands us to build upon reality through the arts. Therein lies the dialectic where transcendence within that which we construct becomes possible. It is not self transcendence as we remain as always as builders but the consequence of the momentum by what we build out from the rudiments of our given reality. The other extreme negates all of this leaving behind its course nothing but rubble. The choice is as always clear. Truth is not to be revered but to be lived and celebrated as our assigned task our aufgaben is that of homo faber (humanity as builder). The world which we build transcends us as it in turn transcends itself.
@jenathent4840
Ah, but we may choose the one extreme which commands us to build upon reality through the arts. Therein lies the dialectic where transcendence within that which we construct becomes possible. It is not self transcendence as we remain as always as builders but the consequence of the momentum by what we build out from the rudiments of our given reality. The other extreme negates all of this leaving behind its course nothing but rubble. The choice is as always clear. Truth is not to be revered but to be lived and celebrated as our assigned task our aufgaben is that of homo faber (humanity as builder). The world which we build transcends us as it in turn transcends itself.