ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 เม.ย. 2020
- How To Apply CPU Thermal Paste Methods - Compare and Benchmark
CPU : I7-9700K
CPU Cooler : Noctua NH-D15
MB : ASUS ROG Strix Z370-E Gaming
RAM : 16GB(8x2) DDR4@3200 Mhz
SSD : M.2 Transcend 220S 1TB
PSU : Seasonic 850W
Thermal Compound Arctic MX-4
Software : Cinebench R20
- Time -
00:07 - One Point
00:41 - One Point Benchmark
01:05 - Five Point
01:38 - Five Point Benchmark
02:04 - Three Line
02:40 - Three Line Benchmark
03:01 - Cross X
03:35 - Cross X Benchmark
04:01 - One Point
04:34 - One Point Benchmark
05:00 - Final Result - เกม
No talking, no bullshit, just 100% info. You know how to TH-cam.
Get up cawksucka, it's a beautiful day
What's wrong with talking?
Actually it’s not that good. You’re just easily impressed.
@@swashington942 r/whoosh
@@keyboardwarrior2418 some people talk too much and no info.
Hands down the best and fastest video showing this info.
No 5 min intro and annoying please subscribe!
who cares, people will keep saying a center pea size is better (and is not, even worse on ryzen).. and there are already videos like this one 10 years ago.
Agreed but everything depends on how much paste u apply.
Cassiopeia and yet you cared enough to waste your precious time to make a pointless comment.
Ill use spread
AT LAST. Someone who uploads an actual useful guide with no talking, no bs, and that actually gets to the point. Thanks a lot for this.
Gets to the point? It's a five minute video and the only bit that actually matters is the last 2 seconds.
@@kjdavis1 Well yes but ...... Okay you're right I just realized that I agree with you.
You really needed a guide for this? That says a lot about the size of your brain 😂
@@Mikael-jt1hk you lack self awareness if u think your statement in and of itself doesn't say a lot about your own intelligence. curb your ego; get off that high horse. nobody respects an insufferable dickhead that can't act their own age.
The funny thing is the video test optimal placement for a inferior product, if going that in depth might as well make a guide on applying liquid thermal paste, the actual top of line conductivity.
Listen here youtube algorithm. I already learned what I needed. I got the job done. Now I don't want to think about it for the next 5 years. I don't need my recommendations filled with thermal paste videos. I'm not a thermal past aficionado do you understand. I'm not planning any trips to thermal paste conventions. It was a one and done kinda deal you get me? Please stop!
Try going into your history and searching thermal paste or pc builds more generally and then removing them.
+1 for this brah@@benjaminrogers8875
😂😂😂😂👍🏻👊💥💯
They may try toothpaste ads before giving up
It's funny how the one being used in the thumbnail as an incorrect example is actually one of the best performing ones
Ikr
ITs Not a thumbnail but clickbait
it's not the incorrect example
It's the X example
edit: this is a bad joke, ignore this lmfao
that's not a mistake... that's called clickbait. "oh my god, a really good method i know of doesn't work? i have to check this out to see why the other methods are better!"
@@lintycarcass This
You forgot the "I paid for the whole tube so i'm going to use the whole tube" method
Lmao
That is me ...i mean it i used the whole tube ....not the one from my cooler used that to but also a tube i hade laying around...i followed this video called the verge 2000$ gaming pc
Use it for everything at home. Even for cooking.
@@thewhiterabbit133 WeLl ThE pC WoRkS tHo
N O
I was a die bonder specialist in a semiconductor manufacturing plant. We always used cross epoxy patterns for square dies as not have voids underneath the die. So your results are spot on.
What about dot pattern
The four corners of die will have less coverage (fillet height) than the middle section of the die edge. @@ArunG273
@@ArunG273I could imagine that it is prone to forming bubbles
I just installed my Ryzen 7 5800x using this method, after watching demos of ALL the methods. This one is the best.!
Perfect guide! Nothing superfluous, just example and result. Thank you!
The cpu:
This was the best day of my life
Lmao
Is that your dog in the thumbnail?
@@rknine7998 yessir
@@kejkej2065 fajny pies
@@benjapizarro981 limão 🍋🍋🍋
i use The Verge method, it's actually quite good, thanks to them now i own a brand new cpu
lmao
lmao
Oof
Stop😂😂
It's essentially good pc building practice.
One of the most useful, to the point, illustrative, short and sweet videos I have ever seen.
I appreciate just getting to the point and showing us the info. Also I love that you demonstrate with the glass what’s happening.
When the x covers the entire cpu is the most satisfying thing ever
I usually do the 5 dot but aftef this im definitely going with the X
the X has found to be one of the quickest and most effective solutions around.
indeed brother
you need to have non conductive thermal paste tho just to make sure nothing will get destroyed
Sometime it doesn't tho, I rather just use the spread method for 100% coverage.
3:05, X-cross works like magic.
It spread perfectly into full square covered cpu
@@jasonlong9196 yea no shit
@@jasonlong9196 ur redundant, he og commenter but the time stamp already.
Perfect thermal spread guide. No ads, easy learn. Thanks
wow
and all without talking for 20 minutes.
no bullshit, just pure information. you, my man, remind me on old school TH-cam.
Big thumbs up!
"X" and "spread" methods are both tied for the best cooling performance, just to save you guys 5 minutes.
(Edit) Thanks for the likes! Great 16th birthday present xD
(Edit again) I have been informed that even though this is theoretically true, when you use "spread" you are spreading the paste to your hight, not the hight of the cooler. This allows for air bubbles, and any airbubbles are the same as not having any paste there.
Danke
@@tachumilk4142 nein
@@ekssdeexd2424 👀
@Erdem spread is the most effective
@Erdem easiest*
from the thumbnail i thought this would be a clickbait video and wasn't expecting such high quality effort content with really useful information
I?
? 7?740000ć0đ🇦🇨
@@jocke8219 ?
Thumbnail is kinda lame tho
@@lucasrosalino3035 appealing for the dumbest people = more views and alghorhitm shit.
Welcome to modern days..
That clear glass thing he was using, he had to reapply the thermal paste anyways to mount the CPU cooler
Very good video, I have been searching a guide on how to use/spread thermal paste, and this is the best of them all. Direct to the point, well done!
For people saying: "just add more paste to the single dot". If you add more paste on the single dot, the paste will spread in a round shape, which means in order to cover the whole square, some paste needs to surpass the edge. The cross shape is the most logical way to cover the space of a square.
Most lógica is to use a spread card and cover whole thing in very thin layer. All those shapes are just going to expand and not cover the whole chip since it’s a square. If the cross doesn’t come out the ends then you know it didn’t reach the inside corners of the cross.
I don’t know why people are so scared to cover the whole cpu, the paste isn’t conductive so any that comes out just wipe off of you want don’t even have to. Better to have whole squared covered than a shaped expanded that doesn’t make a square.
After delidding a CPU and seeing that most of what needed to be covered is to one side of the chip or the other, spreading is absolutely the smartest thing to do; if you're worried you spread it to thin, then apply more, as long as you're not using a conductive paste then it doesn't matter if it comes out the side like you said!
One of the best videos ive ever seen not Talking bullshit for minutes just show what the people want to see and its done . Great Job man !!!! 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
The end result is that you get inaccurate results to satisfy the masses
First time I've seen a video on thermal paste done like this and: why didn't anybody think of that before? The glass is such an effective method to show how the paste spreads! Well done!
It's not an effective method to show how paste spreads, when you screw down the block on your CPU socket it applies much more pressure than what you can do by hand like that, the paste also heats up with your cpu, which makes it spread further. The result here also show max Temps, which could've been a single second spike. I've applied with all methods, with sufficient paste, your cpu always gets covered completely.
The thermal paste spread also depends if you tighten the screws randomly or evenly in a criss cross method
@@TechReflex but he didn't meassure with the glass, so the results should be correct. And if you choose a good method, less paste should be sufficient. Worst would be bad method and to less or to much paste. So for people with no idea how much to take, it's even more helpfull. I did go with a cross most times, once i gave spreading a try.
I've seen a few people do it before but usually people just whine its either not comparable as you aren't as strong or "you could have used more paste on your single spot". Kinda missing the point.
@@TechReflex Wait he didn't actually measure the temps with the glass right. That was just for demonstration
this is the best, the way you showed us with the transparent plate is extremely fantastic
I love videos like these short and full info. Thank you bro
This is probably one of best comparison video, and effort had been taken by applying paste, then turning on computer, running benchmarks, then repeating with different method. Thanks for the video.
Moral of the story: X gon give it to ya.
Rest in peace to Earl Simmons.
🙌🔥
Lyrical boxing !
Damn this is golden 💪🏿
This is good
Always been the best choice. Maximum spread and no chance of bubbles.
Read an article almost 20 years ago that showed the X method being the king, and i’ve been using it ever since. Glad to see that’s still the case.
Loved the test! Added your vid to a save. Spreading is the best!
Best thermal paste guide ever😘 I will go for the cross method ❤️
Wait wat
Noo the verge method is totaly 100% work
why not spread as thin as possible and then do some cross on top with cross center getting more than outer parts?
@@alkaponas to much thermal paste will make it over heat as well.
@@alkaponas I made like that
Spread as thin as possible and then center bit long dot
And I get a good results
the cross was very satisfying, less messy than spreading and covered perfectly, as shown by the test. I HAVE BEEN AWAKENED!
Lol
Piece of advice, overapply or spread it on the gpu die. Otherwise you risk very real damage to the gpu. With the cpu you have the ihs and either thermal paste under it or solder as a buffer before you risk damage.
cross can be replaced by 4 points only in cross (extreme points also meeting center together)
@@ArtisChronicles what is GPU die?
@@HassaanALal die is the top of the gpu chip where you would put the thermal compound, also cpu die same thing.
Awesome editing and sound. So pleasant to watch.
That was satisfying, watched the whole thing. Thanks 🙏🏻
I usually just fill my whole bathtub with thermal paste and completely submerge my whole pc in it. It had yet to exceed -48° i did notice a 92FPS drop due to not being able to see my RGB through the thermal paste, so i made sure to cover the entire bathroom in RGB lights to eliminate FPS loss.
10/10 most effective method so far. Highly recommended.
lmaoo
This is copy pasted from another video bro
😂😂😂😂😂
Thank you, haven't laughed like that in a while
Just buy freezer bro then
There are few times I've witnessed evolution of human thinking. This is one of them. Great thermal paste guide.
I'm not sure the pressure he's applying to that glass is the same pressure that gets applied when cranking down a heat sink. Using the single dot method seems to work pretty good when cranking a heat sink down because when I remove the heat sink it is applied all the way across the CPU every time.
it is what you will get when you think more about certain thing.
What’s that plastic thing he’s using
@@emma6648 it's just a simple piece of flat plastic to press down on the paste so it spreads out
its fucking terrible, it showed nothing, you do realise the second after that video cuts the temperatures quickly rise again, wya better to actually just apply a heatsing to it and let it run for 5-10 minutes with each method to get a true result
this is so satisfying to watch combined with the chill music. no wonder it went viral.
Best and definitive video about thermal paste. Congratulations, and thank you!
Direct to the point, this is just how TH-cam tutorials should be
yeah, but seldom are
Finally something in my recommendations that I'm interested in
great job , this is the best video i had ever seen for thermal paste methods , thank you a lot MYPC
This video is telling eveything about thermal paste applying.. Short and efficient video. Thank you so much!
The thumbnail : "X method ❌❌❌❌"
The content : "X method ⭕⭕⭕⭕"
Einfach nur Müll immer das selbe.
Clickbait
@Frederick Röders yeah only for money
people doing anything
Only stupid people would assume that as click bait, it was just some “art” he did while also using the emojis...nonetheless he a concise information during the video so you should be thankful
Precise information..simple too
Daddy i find u every video stop spying on me >:(
Justin Y.5
@@driptoop3650 nigga tf
Stfu
@@driptoop3650 did u just call him..
Hol up
The best guide I've ever seen! Thanks a lot!
When I built my first pc years ago I researched the topic a bit and the concensus was that spreading was the best method. When I purchased the thermal paste for the build, lo and behold, it came with a plastic spreader.
Perfect. Clear and concise. This is my favourite thermal paste analysis!
3:30 PERFECT, the method im gonna use :)
Well.. he stopped pushing just as the paste arrived at the borders. We don't have the luxury of seeing the paste when placing the cooler. This method can get really messy.
Tri poloski is the best :D
You want a smaller X In the middle. That would result in good coverage without the spillage.
@@FahdRiyami i did that, i got visually temp change, before lowest cpu temp was 42C and on load 81C (very cheap paste) after appling GD-900 lowest 31C on load 70C
It's not recommended.
There are 2 potential issues with this, 1st you might introduce bubble in the thermal paste.
2nd, you might get a overflow and that could get the paste into somewhere it shouldnt
Appreciate the effort of making this video, taking that beasty cooler of multiple times! I have a "Be Quiet BK007 Pure Rock 2 Black" and taking even that off it just too much for a quick inspection.
Really nice video. I was always wondering about this
Thanks for providing one of the basic concept in pc building in an excellent way that is not avaliable anywhere and easy to understand. Another great thing about this video is not always its required to use lips if you know to express it the way its been done in this presentation, hats off to you and thanks for putting all your hard work to provide us the information.
I love how this vid showed the paste coverage using a transparent sheet. Great vid, and I would probably do the x spread.
KP Delaney same. Low effort for high results
Just in case anyone is wondering, I was curious and did a statistical analysis of the temperature data and found that there isn't any significant difference between any of the methods used in this video. Just use which ever one you like and make sure it'll cover at least 2/3 of the CPU when it's spread out and you're good.
Not a chance. There is absolutly a correct way to use thermal paste.
@@timcotton6503like what? As long as you dont put too little youre pretty much set
@@timcotton6503according to this video there's many correct ways to apply it.
@@timcotton6503explain
Well, that puts this argument to rest. One of the best examples I've ever seen if not THE best. Thanks for doing this.
Straight to the point, a lot of work, clear. You have my like.
Really good test, glad to see my ye olde spreading method holds up. Never bothered to try anything else but I would have based on this video of it turned out different. Thanks for making this easy. Also holy crap bro, you did this in a 30 degree room? That's some dedication.
Maybe he lives in aan Asian country. It's actually a cool temperature in summers. Normal Summer temps go as high as 45° in room. And that's the average.
30*C is 86* F Celsius to Fahrenheit
Yeah, south east asian is really hot ans humid, such a pain for computers 😂
Wonderful demonstration.
good to know, when i renew the thermal paste for my ps4, thanks for the short informative video!
Man seriously too good content, too useful. No advertisement, no clickbait, only information. Thanks Sir
The downside is that the information doesn't accurately represent results
i always use the mortal kombat logo method, but it is so time-consuming.
Test your might!!
Nice, with conductive paste you also have the fatality option
Freezer method.
*Fatality*
*FATALITY*
Extremely helpful video!
Great video,thanks man!
So basically, exactly as expected, in that the more of the CPU is covered in thermal paste, the lower the temperatures. Good job.
Not that simple, contact pressure matters too.
No, yuo need just a "thin layer" of the thermal paste
@@noway8233 Hence the contact pressure, which squeezes it to the point where parts of the metal of the heatsink are contacting parts of the metal of the heat spreader, with the paste only serving to fill in the gaps from the texture of the surfaces.
@@soundspark yeah, if both ihs and coldblade of a cooler would have perfect even surfface, you wouldnt need any thermal paste.
Perfect thread in a video that *seems* to be clear-cut, showing our eyes The Truth. We all thank you for your diligence.
That was one of the biggest question marks in my head. Thank you for making this video.
The best video on this topic, thank you! I always use the spread method to remove excess, as a thick layer of thermal paste does not work as well as a thin layer.
Thank you, this information is actual for me! Thanks!
Basically as more area it covers the thermal paste, the more will be able to cool.
Very good video for such a underrated channel.
Really Nice comparisons
i tried the check one thermal paste on the thumbnail, now my temperature reaching new heights! thanks!!
didn't know 100 degrees celsius was possible
I've been doing the single dot method for the longest time. I got to try out the cross method once I get ahold of some more thermal paste!
The best
tutorial I've watched thank you so much
Nice pro video in end you showed all at one time thx🎉❤
The best video.... More fo thw comparation at the end. Tks my friend
Thank you very much for the great video. Obvious results: the larger the contact area of the thermal compound, the larger the heat dissipation area and, consequently, the lower the CPU temperature.
It's all about the quantity not the placement. If you put more in the middle it would have spread too and that's true for all the other methods. So for me there no wrong way of applying thermal past it all about the amount, if you are not sure just spread it manually and you'll be fine.
While the method really doesn't matter if you have enough paste I'd still avoid using the single dot method myself, it's harder to judge how much paste to use and there is a risk of uneven spreading depending on evenness of the cooler's mounting pressure (however small this risk may be). I would personally go with the cross or spreading methods just for the peace of mind of knowing for sure there is full coverage, especially on a larger CPU package like that of ThreadRipper.
Basically just wait for the paste to settle after an hour
With a dot, it will spread as a circle, so to get to the edges, you will have some spilling from the sides...
@@arnauddebroissia8964 except that thermal paste expands with higher temps so after a week it would cover it completely
@@needforspeedgaming7148 so before you have to wait 1 week to get full performance? Naw man i'm good with my own method.
Thank god I don't have to skim thru another 10-20 min video. Right to the point
Very good video! Simple and very visual
Glad to know that cross works best. Since I'd been using that method for all my builds up to now.
same result as spread
@@Chriscs7 but faster and easier
@@the_emmo *if you're not buying bulk paste that comes in a can, anyway
Great Visual Demo of the various methods on applying the compound!!!
All I can say is too much or too little compound makes a difference when running a component past its rated values.
As a side note, Since the time I began working on personal computers, my first (a second hand IBM PC/XT 286) in the early 1990’s and many home builds after, I came to understand Heatsink compound was designed to fill the micro voids/pits in the metal of the Heatsink and CPU heat dissipation plate. That said, you only need enough to fill those voids, so the wipe method of a very thin film of paste applied to the entire heat dissipation plates has worked best for me. The various thermal compounds sold could be a another video.
I'm quite similar in the use of the same method of spreading a thin layer, and I too began building computers in the early 90s but with the 486 SX-25
Incorrect. Linus proved that using too much paste makes no difference, since the excess is all squeezed out during the mounting process regardless. Using too little paste can make a difference.
@@TehButterflyEffectand using just the right amount makes all the difference
@pleasurewasmine Of course you are correct.
Aside from waste, cost, mess (having to clean excess off.)
What other downsides are there of laying down too much?
Perfect video cheers dude 👍
Great video! 👍
Me looking for:
How to make a perfect circle.
Me finding this.
Believe it!
I mean that first one looks pretty circular
Apply pressure over the middle when doing the clear glass demonstration, it'll spread even more. The way you apply pressure flexes the glass.
That's how a cpu cooler would apply pressure tho
@@pantwearer not really
@@pantwearer Your heatsink does not bent does it?
the testing is still pretty accurate tho since they must have tested it with a real cooler :)
@@toxx1220 real cooler is both flatter, more rigid and pressed against the cpu with higher and more even pressure. Point is, application method doesn't matter as long as **enough** thermal paste is applied.
Thx for taking the time to test this out.
It seem cross and spread method product the lowest temperature at 82 when it's running the hottest.
Great Video, thank you for this! =)
When I first started building computers almost two decades ago, I used to use the "spread" method. It just seemed logical to me. But I went to the "one point" method because EVERYONE was saying it's the best and that was that. Well . . . this is what I get for listening to others. I have now learned that it is my moral imperative to gaslight everyone and only listen to myself!
You got me worried bc I just did my first thermal paste and did an X! Lol Happy to see I did the best way! 😁
There's virtually no difference between any of the application methods, you just want to make sure the whole IHS is covered
Very very nice work on the video
this is the best Thermal Paste video i love it :)
You forgot that is also one method called *the verge*, which you are suppose to draw a house on the cpu with the thermal paste
I laughed tooo much 💀💀💀
I think it was more of a cumshot
@@Esnnete only available in Japan though
Spreading is my favorite. We need to consider that he is using a clear plate and controlling how it spreads by applying pressure in different direction. With a heatsink he could not see how it is spreading until it is removed.
Exactly this.
The other methods might have had a much worse application than shown.
If you mount your heatsink correctly and cross screw everything will apply flat after a power on and benchmark, re tighten if possible and everything will be flatten out
Not to mention, he can't generate the same amount of pressure pushing with his hands that a correctly mounted heatsink will do. The grain of rice method is fine, biggest thing is making sure you have the right amount. If you are new to doing it or it's been a while, apply some, mount heatsink, remove heatsink and see how much or little is covered. Remove and reapply with appropriate amount. Stressing the cpu will also heat the paste and spread it out more.
Dunno, seems like the pressure from the heatsink wasn't able to spread out the paste. 86c grain of rice vs 84c spread.
Not a big deal but it's there.
@@Ammothief41 thats margin of error territory. Specailly since we don't know if his room say went to 31c instead of 30c or vice versa having a perfectly stable 30c unless he had ac controlling it to that doesn't really happen. But even then +-2c across cinnbench runs is pretty common
Thank you for making this video!
The plexiglass is a really good way to show how the thermal paste spreads.
This is going to be very useful for my next computer builds that I am doing in about a month from now.
Thank you!
Unfortunately, I have to disappoint you. The video shows exactly nothing. Different amounts of paste were used for the different methods. For example, the 1-point method used by far the least paste. In addition, the video creator was able to decide for himself how exactly the paste spreads. For this reason, the video unfortunately shows nothing at all. I would not be influenced by this "test" in any case. But of course that is up to everyone :-). I prefer to trust years of experience on my part than a TH-cam video of a guy with plexiglass hehe :).
@@heady_
"I prefer to trust years of experience on my part"
That works if you are swapping CPUs and re-applying the thermal paste often enough to build your "years of experience".
The last computer I built was maybe like 6 years ago.
Since then, the size, and in some cases, shape of the CPU IHS has changed quite dramatically, and therefore; it is impossible for me to have "years of experience" with all of the different sizes and shapes of CPU IHS' to be able to ascertain which would be the best for me.
Having said that - you make a fair point, but on the other hand, I doubt that people are weighing the mass of the thermal paste they're using when they're applying it vs. just applying as much as they think is needed as shown here.
i.e. no one meters their thermal paste usage.
Therefore; for this reason, I think that this video is valid.
Like, if you want to study the casual link between the application patterns such that the total mass of the thermal paste that is used with each pattern is identical in order to eliminate that as a variable in the science experiment, I would 100% agree with that.
I have no idea how you'd be able to consistently and repeatedly meter/measure the mass of the thermal paste that is used.
You'd probably have to automate that and then you have to deal with the statistical analysis and hopefully, the data would follow somewhat of a Gaussian distribution to make some of the stats data processing a little bit easier.
This type of a science project would be a great way to spend probably close to about $100k. (Depending on how many variables you want to be able to study simultaneously.)
I mean...not really though. With plexiglass the pressure comes from the corners. With a fan/sink the comes directly onto the surface of the chip. There was definitely also a disparity in the amount of paste. So while I'm glad I watched the video and do think it has some merit, we should acknowledge the fault in the experiment as well.
@@907CoolBoy
"With plexiglass the pressure comes from the corners. "
Based on what data/evidence?
"With a fan/sink the comes directly onto the surface of the chip. "
That depends, a GREAT deal, on the design and manufacturing of the integrated heat spreader.
"we should acknowledge the fault in the experiment as well."
I would love for you to present your data or the source of where /why you think that there are faults in the experiment.
IF you're missing the point of about being able to visualise the mechanical dissipation of the thermal paste in a scenario where you normally wouldn't be able to see it, (not unless you use something like Arctic Silver 5 in the hopes and off chance that you'd be able to visualise said mechanical dissipation under X-ray), I think that this experiment does a good job of show this point.
To your point though, will plexiglass ever be able to REPLICATE the mechanical dissipation pattern (size and shape) of a mechaincal dissipation of a metallic CPU heatsink (and fan assembly, though the fan probably has VERY little to do with said mechanical dissipation) -- probably not as the interaction between the thermal paste and the plexiglass will have different surface tension properties.
But you're also unlikely to RUN the CPU that way as well, given that the plexiglass has a SIGNIFICANTLY lower thermal conductivity value than metals (be it aluminum and/or copper (with or without the nickel plating)).
But if you are trying to highlight that plexiglass != metal, I think that you've completely missed the point of the exercise here.
Oh and BTW, the distribution of the pressure is HIGHLY dependent on the geometry of the mating parts, such that if the integrated heat spreader was slightly convex prior to the application of the plexiglass and the plexiglass has a surface flatness callout where said flatness callout is LESS than the surface roughness callout, then your point about the pressure originating from the corners will NOT be correct as it will be physically impossible for that since you have a convex contact to a flat surface, and at the point of initial contact is where you start to produce the highest contact pressure.
Best TH-cam guide ever!
Excellent comparison video, I now show this to all the guys that ask me why I always spread the paste! ;) Thank you.
Now they will ask why dont you just make a cross since its faster and easier lol
The spreading of the X method was satisfying AF
Had no idea how you applied it affected the temperature. Great video thanks :)
Great comparison 👏 thanx 👍
This debate is now over, certainly one of the most useful video on TH-cam. Thanks mate
All bein' fooled here, man. That's not right.
@@jeanhiker Which one is the right one then?
Iv been waiting to buy a new cooler before I put my build together. Glad to know that I can just use a peice of plexiglass on top! Thanks
The video I've wanted to see since I built my first pc. And as a spreader, I'm glad to see the results. I know I can get the same results by just using a dot, which it looks like you were a bit light on for that one, but I just like to know beyond the shadow of a doubt that I got perfect coverage.
The dot had the one of the worst results it was 4th to last. The best results was the "X" and spread methods.
being a "spreader" sounds really wrong lol
@@WarLord_87 if he would have applied more than it would have been perfect coverage. Spread works best because there is no room for error with the amount . The method of application is not important, the amount of paste is. Always better to put a bit to much than to little.
Awesome test
Extreme overclockers spread the paste and that has given me the best results.
yep, always makes best result, you just have to be good at spreading the right amount!
Wowitsshit What is the best one
@@herocosmogt8335 the paste? i used arctic mx-4, but i hear the thermal grizzly is even better. i spread with credit card! is best! but don't agitate the paste too much to work air bubbles in it.
Wowitsshit I will use the spread or x method
@@herocosmogt8335 yeah X sounds good too, dot in middle never spreads out over the whole thing.