To speak on A Fleming is not possible without mentioning Howard Florey , Ernst Chain , and their contribution in a research , who obtained a Nobel prize with AF.
You cannot say one scientists is better than the other. If someone says that to normal people, people go on campaigns but for scientists comparison, it is a joke. Just saying.
I notice most recent was a year ago. This series, to continue with the motif scientist "versus" scientist, at least should have contrasts that truly represent opposing views. For example in Pasteur's case, the obvious competing view would be Bechamp. For another example, A.A. Michelson vs Einstein. Or even the more obscure O.C. Hilgenberg, whose theory of the turbulent ether of space and the vortex atom model of Carl F. Krafft answer the propositions of space time with truly visualizable hydromechanical mechanisms explaining red shift problem, and even planetary orbits, such as the perturbations of the perihelion of Mercury. As it stands, this series is merely two short bios and nothing about any of the is apropos of "versus". At any rate, hope inspiration finds you and you continue to produce material.
Yes, while scientists in Pasteur's day believed paratartrates were one type of crystal, they are actually a 50/50 mix of two crystals, which is what Pasteur found.
They (both) are Greatest Scientist in OUR Human Lives : Alexander Fleming and Louis Pasteur.. It is my Immense Grateful to both of them.. Always be remained in remembering you Both......... Basavaraj, From India.
Pasteur way better Fleming did only one thing and that too by accident & meant of luck. He didn't even have the ability to mass produce or purify the drug. It was done by two other biochemist. Pasteur made far more and better contribution
Clarity, presenting historical background, with photos, vivid narration, simply in one word, A wonderful presentation. Thank you very much. 👌🌹
To speak on A Fleming is not possible without mentioning Howard Florey , Ernst Chain , and their contribution in a research , who obtained a Nobel prize with AF.
I think this is one of your most detailed and overall best videos, wonder why so few views compared to the others in this series?
You are gods gift to this world, thank you for making this I have a test tomorrow on this 😽😽😽😽
using a quote from Louis Pasteur to describe Alexander Fleming while comparing them? how meta, bro
Good job, good attention to detail. I prefer Pasteur :)
Where were you for the past 6 months? Finally
You should make more videos about medicine related stuff
Good video.
An honorary mention about Jenner wrt vaccines would have been great.
Jenner deserves much more than an honorary mention, he did create the first vaccine after all
Pasteur hands down! He's the man
Aside from all the stuff he took from other people
You cannot say one scientists is better than the other. If someone says that to normal people, people go on campaigns but for scientists comparison, it is a joke. Just saying.
make one about ludwig bolztman
I notice most recent was a year ago. This series, to continue with the motif scientist "versus" scientist, at least should have contrasts that truly represent opposing views. For example in Pasteur's case, the obvious competing view would be Bechamp. For another example, A.A. Michelson vs Einstein. Or even the more obscure O.C. Hilgenberg, whose theory of the turbulent ether of space and the vortex atom model of Carl F. Krafft answer the propositions of space time with truly visualizable hydromechanical mechanisms explaining red shift problem, and even planetary orbits, such as the perturbations of the perihelion of Mercury. As it stands, this series is merely two short bios and nothing about any of the is apropos of "versus". At any rate, hope inspiration finds you and you continue to produce material.
This is good stuff but why the "vs"?
You cannot compare two people who contributed a lot to the world. It is very insulting if someone does so.
The part about crystallography was confusing ... so paratartrates aren't one type of crystal, they're two types? But tartrates are just one?
Yes, while scientists in Pasteur's day believed paratartrates were one type of crystal, they are actually a 50/50 mix of two crystals, which is what Pasteur found.
The episode 8 maybe Arthur Compton vs Ernest Lawrence?
or Emilio Segre vs Owen Chamberlain. They were Enrico Fermi's students...
and Nobel winners
Enrico Fermi-Atomic sailors ft Owen Chamberlain, Leona Woods.
hell yeah
Merci pour tout
Thank you
I wonder if anyone believes that maggots are the cause of death of a creature when they are found in such great number on rotting/decaying meat.
So you have to be there to see it
Imagine life without penicillin, even a tooth abscess could result in terrible painful death before it's discovery.
Lol people lived before that.
Don't exaggerate these nonsense
Universities were free of payment
Also free education
With some money from the state
They (both) are Greatest Scientist in OUR Human Lives : Alexander Fleming and Louis Pasteur..
It is my Immense Grateful to both of them..
Always be remained in remembering you Both.........
Basavaraj, From India.
Lol they are nothing compared to newton,galileo,einstein.they won't be in top 10 ever
Not in a laboratory
Круто!
Cool
Fleming was a beast
lol he discovered accidentally. pasteur better
he was a brainless idiot who got lucky
@@sohelbashar6925 Pasteur also took a good bit from other people and now he's credited with others' discoveries, how's that for better?
Dope with a capital d
Hello old friend
There miss Albert and Enrico in the chat :(
Albert and Enrico are the best of the Scientists chat. Brilliants!!!
but the chat without Albert and Enrico is sad.
Pasteur way better
Fleming did only one thing and that too by accident & meant of luck. He didn't even have the ability to mass produce or purify the drug. It was done by two other biochemist. Pasteur made far more and better contribution