In fact, Turkic-speaking peoples have played a major role in Iranian history, ruling the country from the eleventh century up to the early twentieth. Even today they represent more than a quarter of Iran's population. Foltz, R. (2016) Iran in world history. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press. p.61 Homa Katouzian, "Iranian history and politics", Published by Routledge, 2003. p. 128: "Indeed, since the formation of the Ghaznavids state in the tenth century until the fall of Qajars at the beginning of the twentieth century, most parts of the Iranian cultural regions were ruled by Turkic-speaking dynasties most of the time.
In a letter to the Ottoman Grand Vizier in 1736, Nadir refers to the Iran throne as "hereditary property of the Turkmen noble people" (mawrusi-yi il-i celil-i turkman)"., Source: E. Tucker, "Religion and Politics in the Nadir Shah Era...", p.166
He called himself as the Nader of Iran zemin (greater Iran) on his coins, he was the savior of Iran. Boyuk Nader shah Iranli idi. Osmanlilar Yonanestanidir. Turk deyil.
"Nāder’s focus on common Turkmen descent likewise was designed to establish a broad political framework that could tie him, more closely than his Safavid predecessors, to both Ottomans and Mughals. When describing Nāder’s coronation, Astarābādi called the assembly on the Moḡān steppe a quriltāy, evoking the practice of Mughal and Timurid conclaves that periodically met to select new khans. In various official documents, Nāder recalled how he, Ottomans, Uzbeks, and Mughals shared a common Turkmen heritage. This concept for him resembled, in broad terms, the origin myths of 15th century Anatolian Turkmen dynasties. However, since he also addressed the Mughal emperor as a “Turkmen” ruler, Nāder implicitly extended the word “Turkmen” to refer, not only to progeny of the twenty-four Ḡozz tribes, but to Timur’s descendants as well. Nāder’s novel concepts regarding the Jaʿfari maḏhab and common “Turkmen” descent were directed primarily at the Ottomans and Mughals. "
Very interesting, Nader saved Iran from Ottomons and Uzbeks and Russians. He was an Iranian turk from Khrosan. He has nothing to do with ottomons, he wanted to make peace for the muslim worlds so that the colonist could not take our region.
Though Nader khan was illiterate, he was born for war and he was a genius of military affairs. Many modern historians liken him to the great Alexander, at times to Napoleon, at times to Emir Timur and they are not mis-akenWithin some years he freed the occupied territories and he united the new lands into the state. It testified that he was a great military strategist. His ability was inborn. He was resoutely sure that in order to set up a mobilized army the fighters had to be trained seriously with military instructions, and he always toiled in that direction. Like a strategist Nader Shah was superior to all the warlords who were against him. Before the battle he always attended to all the small details and niceties and only then carried out the battles. One of his successful tactics was carefully attacking the enemy with troopers from the unexpected place. His infantry fighters were very disciplined and they were not weaker than the yanichers of the Ottomans. During the battles, if the enemy made his groups retreat a little Nader khan then used to enter that group, kill the sotnick, military leader personally and appoint another one to the post. That was why his fighters never retreated if they weren't ordered. Nader khan skillfully used the spare troops too. The main point was that he could easily sense the weak point of the enemy. and if it needed. he could send spare troops there. The name of Nader khan is also connected with the development of heavy artillery. His military qualities increased after he became the Shah. He was also born as a nice organizer and an instructor. After his personal efforts, he who wasn't a fighter could be turned into a skilful fighter. One of his superior qualities was that he paid attention to stiffening the spirit among the fighters. To control the army spread all over the country, and to make them obey his orders show his ability to organize. Nader Shah had a wonderful memory. In a big troop he knew the officers name by name. Also he remembered exactly when and to which private fighter he had awarded a medal or had them punished. He could turn the mass of disorderly and uncontrollable fighters into a great and mighty army in Asia. And even, Napoleon greatly admired Nader emerges from the record of Amédée Jaubert, the French Orientalist who, having acted as Napoleon's interpreter in Egypt, visited Iran in 1807 to conclude a Franco-Iranian alliance. Jaubert carried with him a letter from Napoleon in which the French emperor, somewhat injudiciously in front of the sedentary Fath ‘Ali Shah, praised Nader Shah as a ‘great warrior’, who was ‘able to conquer a great power’, who ‘struck the insurgents with terror and was fearsome to his neighbors’, while he ‘triumphed over his enemies and reigned gloriously’. Furthermore; Spencer Coakley Tucker, one of the leading experts on military and naval history described Nader Shah as: A man of ruthless ambition and immense energy, he was certainly one of the great captains of military history. A master strategist, he was immensely successful in raising armies. He was also both cynical and cruel, and his reign was marked by violence and bloodshed. Nonetheless, he had taken Persia from near collapse to dominant power in the region.
In the spring of 1727 an Armenian uprising began in Syunik which was led by David Bek. There were several reasons of the rebellion 1) Armenia had no independence and wanted to recreate its own land 2) Armenians wanted to liberate their country from Ottoman occupation 3) The disintegration of Safavids and the dynastic crisis in Persia (I mean the Persian region) was a good opportunity to regain the independence The David Bek’s uprising took place in Syunik (Zangezur), Artsakh (Karabagh), Karadagh and Gardman (modern districts of Dashkasan, Gadabay, and Göygöl), Armenia gained its independence for 8 years, but after David Bek’s death, Nadir Shah defeated Armenians and conquered the Transcaucasian region + you’ve forgot to add the melikdoms of Artsakh, which were vassals of Safavids and Afsharids, but I think they were too small that you couldn’t add them
@@Afshar1 What do you say? At all, he was from Khorasan, I doubt the Azeris are stealing history for your region?😂 😂😂🇮🇷❤️🇮🇷 At all, the statue of Nader Shah was built in Mashhad in the capital of his state 🇮🇷 There are some historical statues of Nader Shah in Azerbaijan Thieves Yes, I am Pan-Iranian, so that you Pan-Turks can be pressured
Mongol empire🇮🇷 German empire🇮🇷 Soviet Union 🇮🇷 Qing Dynasty🇮🇷 Third Reich🇮🇷 British Empire🇮🇷 Napeleonic france 🇮🇷 Ottoman Empire🇮🇷 Macedonian Empire🇮🇷 Roman Empire🇮🇷 Russian Empire🇮🇷 Holy Roman Empire🇮🇷 Empire of Japan🇮🇷 Spainsh Empire🇮🇷
In fact, Turkic-speaking peoples have played a major role in Iranian history, ruling the country from the eleventh century up to the early twentieth. Even today they represent more than a quarter of Iran's population.
Foltz, R. (2016) Iran in world history. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press. p.61
Homa Katouzian, "Iranian history and politics", Published by Routledge, 2003. p. 128: "Indeed, since the formation of the Ghaznavids state in the tenth century until the fall of Qajars at the beginning of the twentieth century, most parts of the Iranian cultural regions were ruled by Turkic-speaking dynasties most of the time.
In a letter to the Ottoman Grand Vizier in 1736, Nadir refers to the Iran throne as "hereditary property of the Turkmen noble people" (mawrusi-yi il-i celil-i turkman)".,
Source:
E. Tucker, "Religion and Politics in the Nadir Shah Era...", p.166
He called himself as the Nader of Iran zemin (greater Iran) on his coins, he was the savior of Iran. Boyuk Nader shah Iranli idi.
Osmanlilar Yonanestanidir. Turk deyil.
Nice video
"Nāder’s focus on common Turkmen descent likewise was designed to establish a broad political framework that could tie him, more closely than his Safavid predecessors, to both Ottomans and Mughals. When describing Nāder’s coronation, Astarābādi called the assembly on the Moḡān steppe a quriltāy, evoking the practice of Mughal and Timurid conclaves that periodically met to select new khans. In various official documents, Nāder recalled how he, Ottomans, Uzbeks, and Mughals shared a common Turkmen heritage. This concept for him resembled, in broad terms, the origin myths of 15th century Anatolian Turkmen dynasties. However, since he also addressed the Mughal emperor as a “Turkmen” ruler, Nāder implicitly extended the word “Turkmen” to refer, not only to progeny of the twenty-four Ḡozz tribes, but to Timur’s descendants as well.
Nāder’s novel concepts regarding the Jaʿfari maḏhab and common “Turkmen” descent were directed primarily at the Ottomans and Mughals. "
Pörşın hero🐸
@@papazataklaattiranimam No Kurdish hero🐰
Very interesting, Nader saved Iran from Ottomons and Uzbeks and Russians. He was an Iranian turk from Khrosan.
He has nothing to do with ottomons, he wanted to make peace for the muslim worlds so that the colonist could not take our region.
Though Nader khan was illiterate, he was born for war and he was a genius of military affairs. Many modern historians liken him to the great Alexander, at times to Napoleon, at times to Emir Timur and they are not mis-akenWithin some years he freed the occupied territories and he united the new lands into the state. It testified that he was a great military strategist. His ability was inborn. He was resoutely sure that in order to set up a mobilized army the fighters had to be trained seriously with military instructions, and he always toiled in that direction. Like a strategist Nader Shah was superior to all the warlords who were against him. Before the battle he always attended to all the small details and niceties and only then carried out the battles.
One of his successful tactics was carefully attacking the enemy with troopers from the unexpected place. His infantry fighters were very disciplined and they were not weaker than the yanichers of the Ottomans.
During the battles, if the enemy made his groups retreat a little Nader khan then used to enter that group, kill the sotnick, military leader personally and appoint another one to the post. That was why his fighters never retreated if they weren't ordered.
Nader khan skillfully used the spare troops too. The main point was that he could easily sense the weak point of the enemy. and if it needed. he could send spare troops there.
The name of Nader khan is also connected with the development of heavy artillery.
His military qualities increased after he became the Shah.
He was also born as a nice organizer and an instructor. After his personal efforts, he who wasn't a fighter could be turned into a skilful fighter. One of his superior qualities was that he paid attention to stiffening the spirit among the fighters.
To control the army spread all over the country, and to make them obey his orders show his ability to organize.
Nader Shah had a wonderful memory. In a big troop he knew the officers name by name. Also he remembered exactly when and to which private fighter he had awarded a medal or had them punished.
He could turn the mass of disorderly and uncontrollable fighters into a great and mighty army in Asia.
And even, Napoleon greatly admired Nader emerges from the record of Amédée Jaubert, the French Orientalist who, having acted as Napoleon's interpreter in Egypt, visited Iran in 1807 to conclude a Franco-Iranian alliance. Jaubert carried with him a letter from Napoleon in which the French emperor, somewhat injudiciously in front of the sedentary Fath ‘Ali Shah, praised Nader Shah as a ‘great warrior’, who was ‘able to conquer a great power’, who ‘struck the insurgents with terror and was fearsome to his neighbors’, while he ‘triumphed over his enemies and reigned gloriously’.
Furthermore; Spencer Coakley Tucker, one of the leading experts on military and naval history described Nader Shah as:
A man of ruthless ambition and immense energy, he was certainly one of the great captains of military history. A master strategist, he was immensely successful in raising armies. He was also both cynical and cruel, and his reign was marked by violence and bloodshed. Nonetheless, he had taken Persia from near collapse to dominant power in the region.
Aga bir şey soracağım, sence Safevilerin ekonomisi tahmini kaç milyar dolar olmuşdur? Bence 21 milyar, senin tahminlerini alalım
@@Afshar1 30 gibi
@@papazataklaattiranimam teşekkürler
Nader of Iran Zemin , as he called himself on his coin. He was the savoir of Iran from the civil war. In fact the last
That’s cool! But I found a few mistakes…
What's the mistakes?
In the spring of 1727 an Armenian uprising began in Syunik which was led by David Bek. There were several reasons of the rebellion
1) Armenia had no independence and wanted to recreate its own land
2) Armenians wanted to liberate their country from Ottoman occupation
3) The disintegration of Safavids and the dynastic crisis in Persia (I mean the Persian region) was a good opportunity to regain the independence
The David Bek’s uprising took place in Syunik (Zangezur), Artsakh (Karabagh), Karadagh and Gardman (modern districts of Dashkasan, Gadabay, and Göygöl), Armenia gained its independence for 8 years, but after David Bek’s death,
Nadir Shah defeated Armenians and conquered the Transcaucasian region
+ you’ve forgot to add the melikdoms of Artsakh, which were vassals of Safavids and Afsharids, but I think they were too small that you couldn’t add them
@@noffill_zangezurian_edits I hadn't heard of these before, interesting. And yes, I did not add small vassal states so that it would not be difficult
0:49 🇱🇺
Əfşaridlər🇦🇿💪
Iran
@@daumo4319Afshar was an turkic tribe bro :)
@@Afshar1 afsharid were iranian
@@daumo4319Afshars is an turkic tribe, even name was turkic, so how it can be iranian?
@@Afshar1 why the Nader shah consider himself as Iranian on his golden coin ?
Iran va Azerbayjan jumhuriati bir millatdir. Biz (🇮🇷🇦🇿) Nader shahin Xalqiq.
Sana mesaj yaziyorum neden siliniyor
Bilmiyorum
@@Afshar1 dicektimki dcin varmi?
@@N1etzscher Afşar#2821
@@Afshar1 atdim, kabul et
@@Afshar1 qoz qoy😭
Selam azeri agam sana birşey demem lazım
De
✅افشاریان🇮🇷
❌افشاریان🇦🇿
افشاریان=🇮🇷
😂
؟
1979 ایران همجنسگرا 🏳️🌈🇮🇷🏳️🌈🇮🇷🏳️🌈🇮🇷🧘🏿♂️
First warning troll
-🤡
afsharid🇮🇷💪💪
Fun fact: Modern afshars are sub-ethnic group of Azerbaijanis 😂
@@Afshar1 fun fact nader shah said he is iranian on his golden coin
@@Afshar1 fun fact they were iranian azeri
@@daumo4319Have nothing with modern iran
@@Afshar1 Nader shah said he is Iranian king on his golden coin not any other country 😂
It was an Iranian empire you fools🇮🇷😂🇮🇷
In your dreams pan-iranist
@@Afshar1 What do you say?
At all, he was from Khorasan, I doubt the Azeris are stealing history for your region?😂
😂😂🇮🇷❤️🇮🇷
At all, the statue of Nader Shah was built in Mashhad in the capital of his state 🇮🇷
There are some historical statues of Nader Shah in Azerbaijan
Thieves
Yes, I am Pan-Iranian, so that you Pan-Turks can be pressured
Yes, keep lying to yourself 😂🇮🇷
🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷
Afsharie Pars 🇮🇷
Safavieh Pars 🇮🇷
Qajar of Pars 🇮🇷
🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷
Mongol empire🇮🇷
German empire🇮🇷
Soviet Union 🇮🇷
Qing Dynasty🇮🇷
Third Reich🇮🇷
British Empire🇮🇷
Napeleonic france 🇮🇷
Ottoman Empire🇮🇷
Macedonian Empire🇮🇷
Roman Empire🇮🇷
Russian Empire🇮🇷
Holy Roman Empire🇮🇷
Empire of Japan🇮🇷
Spainsh Empire🇮🇷