Elon Musk's Plan for the US National Debt.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @NewMoneyYouTube
    @NewMoneyYouTube  หลายเดือนก่อน +796

    Thanks for watching guys! Let me know what you think of Elon's plan - are you all for it? Or do you find it to be a conflict of interest. I'm interested to hear your thoughts!
    Also (getting ahead of the comments) - I know Dana White is the CEO not founder of the UFC... just misspoke.

    • @markmcguire7261
      @markmcguire7261 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      If elon cuts the debt it will cause the dollar to get stronger and cause a global dollar shortage. People fear hyperinflation in the united states. Probability is less than 1% but why? The dollar debt is not in physical dollars. It's been loaned out by banks. Commercial banks are 95% the guts of the global monetary system

    • @johnl9977
      @johnl9977 หลายเดือนก่อน +191

      The last 40+ years of Republican tax cuts for the obscenely wealthy have given us almost all of the current national debt and deficits. Republicans have it so that billionaires pay about one third the percentage of their income in federal taxes as the average family that works for a living. We do not tax the wealthy in this country to the extent that they should be taxed. All the huge profit margins of companies come directly out of the pockets of the people that work for a living and go right in the pockets of those who don't, the wealthy of our country. "Trickle Down" is the biggest scam in the history of the world and that is why we have the deficits and debt that we do.

    • @ILoveTinfoilHats
      @ILoveTinfoilHats หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      How about instead you get ahead of the bot comments and start doing some cleanup instead of letting scammers own your comments section.

    • @jaybird9355
      @jaybird9355 หลายเดือนก่อน +75

      I would start with the subsidy for tesla 🤔

    • @l000tube
      @l000tube หลายเดือนก่อน

      A master class in sane washing the insane. Elon is a lunatic and shouldnt be left anywhere near government control as a business man (the fox running the hen house scenario). If you really care about government debt, its easy: bring back the Green Back dollar, a dollar without interest attached. You dont need elon musk to do that. He's a spoilt brat who more than 1 screw loose.

  • @robertfox4524
    @robertfox4524 หลายเดือนก่อน +17297

    Many government employees are taught to use every dollar allocated each year or risk losing funds next year. That is one practice that needs to change.

    • @M80-i6m
      @M80-i6m หลายเดือนก่อน +913

      Yup, when I was working at the VA, they were spending on junk just to use up the budget (as a tax payer, I was pissed that my tax money was going to BS junk)

    • @ACT4UCF
      @ACT4UCF หลายเดือนก่อน +577

      That happens in private companies too.

    • @OmegaRejectz
      @OmegaRejectz หลายเดือนก่อน +237

      @@ACT4UCF don't tell them that. Obviously the multi-billion dollar international companies are looking out for their best interests...

    • @michaelbean9165
      @michaelbean9165 หลายเดือนก่อน +197

      I knew a nuclear physicist who worked for the AEC back in the '70's and he told me the same thing. Near the end of the year they went on a spending spree to spend all the money bugeted to them so they wouldn't be forced to reduce the budget for the next year.

    • @yedidyah-jedshlomoh1533
      @yedidyah-jedshlomoh1533 หลายเดือนก่อน +72

      Even cities believe this. I have seen it. sick.

  • @BulletproofPastor
    @BulletproofPastor หลายเดือนก่อน +8080

    I was once called off the job to drive 20 min. to the county office 3rd floor, carry a form downstairs to an employee in a tiny office who looked up my tax record ON THE SAME COMPUTER SYSTEM that the form was printed from and stamp the form "taxes current." I took the form back upstairs where they added that update to THE SAME COMPUTER SYSTEM. I asked why the system didn't just update itself and was told "If we did that, the employee downstairs wouldn't have a job and her manager would lose headcount."

    • @V8dadmartin
      @V8dadmartin หลายเดือนก่อน +659

      Reminds me of this one really interesting TH-cam video, I think it’s called “useless jobs”. Basically list a bunch of jobs that have no business existing in government jobs

    • @PowerAnjohn
      @PowerAnjohn หลายเดือนก่อน +194

      Wtf that sounds even more stupid than our german chancelor Olaf😂

    • @theonion3667
      @theonion3667 หลายเดือนก่อน +156

      They have to spend budgets and run short to continue to get increasing budgets in case they need it. Reminds me of a factory job I did once where I got taught to work slow to allow time and motion to allocate more time per product in case someone else was slower or something went wrong one day.

    • @hendrand
      @hendrand หลายเดือนก่อน +50

      So sad. Great example!

    • @Eduardude
      @Eduardude หลายเดือนก่อน

      Government parasites. Too many of them.

  • @robertd9850
    @robertd9850 หลายเดือนก่อน +1333

    Replace the "spend it or lose it" budget mentality with a rewards for savings budget mentality and the federal debt drops like a rock.

    • @robinstrongbow4249
      @robinstrongbow4249 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      get that "use it or lose it" mentality at the municiple level too

    • @ebinrock
      @ebinrock หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      This needs to happen at the state and local levels too.

    • @tagcoriolis1029
      @tagcoriolis1029 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ebinrock So Elon Musk creates massive unemployment then says, all you NASA scientists can bring your hardware and intellectual property to Space X, all you unemployed bureaucrats can learn to install Tesla power walls, all you unemployed FBI and CIA can work for my personal security service. All hail Emperor Musk! ( cue the Darth Vader music)

    • @koller8930
      @koller8930 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      We have that at our company.
      All the departments are slowly starving, because the people in charge try to save AS MUCH AS THEY CAN to get as much of a bonus the end of the year lmao

    • @tagcoriolis1029
      @tagcoriolis1029 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@koller8930 So Elon Musk creates massive unemployment then says, all you NASA scientists can bring your hardware and intellectual property to Space X, all you unemployed bureaucrats can learn to install Tesla power walls, all you unemployed FBI and CIA can work for my personal security service. All hail Emperor Musk! ( cue the Darth Vader music)

  • @jimmiesides2457
    @jimmiesides2457 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +137

    I think the best way to start balancing the budget is to stop giving humongous tax cuts to entities that don't need the money in the first place.

    • @Cryptosifu
      @Cryptosifu 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

      How about the FED stops printing money out of thin air.

    •  7 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      ​@@CryptosifuThey need to print more money now that they are cutting taxes.

    • @candicesmith5985
      @candicesmith5985 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      Quit giving billions of dollars to the same companies year after year while others get nothing

    • @thomas-k2k8w
      @thomas-k2k8w 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      Taxes do not fund the government.
      if they did, explain why the national debt has never gone down 1 cent.
      Taxes go to the federal reserve as interest for using their fiat currency as legal tender, tariffs, excise taxes and borrowing more from the federal reserve is how the country is funded.

    • @Cryptosifu
      @Cryptosifu 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@thomas-k2k8w exactly

  • @drzfinestperiod5
    @drzfinestperiod5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8640

    I wonder if Elon will go to Boeing and say " hey we're not paying any more of these 4,000% markups for parts anymore..."

    • @rajkumarbharathi3139
      @rajkumarbharathi3139 หลายเดือนก่อน +441

      Boeing is alreay palnning to shut down their space department.

    • @drzfinestperiod5
      @drzfinestperiod5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @rajkumarbharathi3139 it doesn't matter. Boeing sells replacement airplane parts to the military that costs them pennies to make, they sell it to to government for thousands of tens of thousands of dollars... But Elon will have you believe that it's the national parks, the food stamps, the environmental regulators that are wasting your money.

    • @jacc88888
      @jacc88888 หลายเดือนก่อน +737

      He’d need a few more bodyguards before he does that…

    • @zainshamim343
      @zainshamim343 หลายเดือนก่อน +210

      @@rajkumarbharathi3139 he’s talking about the military components

    • @crazyburkey3677
      @crazyburkey3677 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      💩,no

  • @robertfox4524
    @robertfox4524 หลายเดือนก่อน +3881

    "Elon - because he's not very busy..." Best line.

    • @KateHikes666
      @KateHikes666 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

      Was that sarcastic?

    • @maskofsan1ty
      @maskofsan1ty หลายเดือนก่อน +268

      ​@@KateHikes666no. He speeds most of his time tweeting.

    • @tDude666
      @tDude666 หลายเดือนก่อน +82

      HR Department: "We hired this candidate - because he's not very busy..."

    • @qhinton
      @qhinton หลายเดือนก่อน +61

      I heard that too. All that's going to happen is Elon will be lazy and run each budget through AI and cut where the computer tells him to.

    • @DevilTravels
      @DevilTravels หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Idle hands of the devil ....

  • @bobtoner9820
    @bobtoner9820 หลายเดือนก่อน +2841

    Encourage government workers to anonymously report waste. Doing nothing is not a option.

    • @1MTEK
      @1MTEK หลายเดือนก่อน +111

      They're not going to tattle on themselves.

    • @GreatWhiteStud
      @GreatWhiteStud หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      You get fired for reporting waste. I saw it happen

    • @SailorMac808
      @SailorMac808 หลายเดือนก่อน +73

      This actually worked at the VA in Trump’s first term

    • @EuphoriAI-s9y
      @EuphoriAI-s9y หลายเดือนก่อน +132

      bruh i was in the navy and I worked on a radar. The fans that cooled the circuit cards were 10k each. They are basically the same fans inside a desktop computer. There were like 20 fans. They also broke every year like clockwork. "MIL" spec fans lol

    • @gtrtrailrunner21
      @gtrtrailrunner21 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      This option already exists. There is annual training for federal employees on the process.

  • @BBBUrMom
    @BBBUrMom 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +62

    The crazy part is the government never gets denied for borrowing money... we do.

    • @Hueyck
      @Hueyck 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      People don’t live forever. The government does so has all the time to pay it back.

    • @paul4381
      @paul4381 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      @@Hueyck Yeah like Greece

    • @andreaswedin3165
      @andreaswedin3165 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@paul4381 except the US has it's own currency and can always pay. It can always decide it's interest rates and never runs out of money. In fact it does not even need to borrow. It can just pay. Forever.

    • @OKCoucou-jt3bp
      @OKCoucou-jt3bp 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Its true but banks all know one thing thats is very true. If the US cant repay their debt, the world economy and the banks with it would be doomed.

    • @jmurphy6767
      @jmurphy6767 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@paul4381you don’t see any differences between the US and Greece? Greece is basically a colony of the EU

  • @bthompson8467
    @bthompson8467 หลายเดือนก่อน +2304

    As a 30+ year military veteran/federal employee, the list of nonsense expenditures never seems to end. There were congressional allocations for training and equipment that we had no choice but to find uses for which were completely unnecessary.

    • @FloppimusMaximus
      @FloppimusMaximus หลายเดือนก่อน

      8 TRILLION under tRump. Not just COVID, 1.7 TRILLION per year.

    • @SawStriker
      @SawStriker หลายเดือนก่อน

      So why does the deficit always increase with republicans in office? You know trump raised it by a tremendous amount but only dems are bad with money right?

    • @elibullockpapa9012
      @elibullockpapa9012 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

      key word: congressional allocations. Almost none of this can happen without congressional buy in

    • @SteveSherman-jp1dz
      @SteveSherman-jp1dz หลายเดือนก่อน +51

      I did the military, contractor, federal employee thing and got burned out on the laziness and corruption. The big weapons programs suck up so much budget for so little return. Then they nickel and dime the lower ranks and their personal weapons and gear. I went to Iraq with 3 different colors of camouflage, a 30 year rifle, and defective body armor.

    • @chrishardy4609
      @chrishardy4609 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      My favorite thing was the $2600 desk chairs that were always both brand new and broken at the same time.

  • @Ron_P
    @Ron_P หลายเดือนก่อน +2254

    Part of the problem is departments must spend their entire budget to get that same budget the following year. If a department doesn't spend the entire amount, use it to pay the debt. Companies do the same stupid thing. They cut budgets when they don't spend it because apparently you didn't need it.

    • @Amir-um7ql
      @Amir-um7ql หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      Exactly

    • @codeintherough
      @codeintherough หลายเดือนก่อน +78

      Definitely a perverse incentive

    • @daviddavis1322
      @daviddavis1322 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      That's the Cost+ mentality. I suspect this will be a main talking point since the SV types abhor this method.

    • @codeintherough
      @codeintherough หลายเดือนก่อน

      What's sv?​@@daviddavis1322

    • @crikey47
      @crikey47 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      This is true in corporations too. It's the main way they show their value is by the size of their budget

  • @Rogerederer-b2r
    @Rogerederer-b2r 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +1332

    It’s amazing really. We have a financial crisis, caused by greedy, reckless financial institutions. Congress passes legislation requiring those institutions to be less greedy and reckless. The institutions then lobby to have those restrictions removed, usually in the name of “remaining competitive”. This leads to another financial crisis. It’s completely predictable, and we have been doing this dance since the Great Depression almost 100 years ago.

    • @Chrishat-x2j
      @Chrishat-x2j 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

      Agree; the rules should be applicable to all banks - big or small. First; very few meaningful laws are passed and then this cycle of doing-undoing seems to support deregulation risking the economy and the faith in banks.

    • @KingRoh-t8h
      @KingRoh-t8h 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      A lot of folks downplay the role of advisors until being burnt by their own emotions. I remember couple summers back, after my lengthy divorce, I needed a good boost to help my business stay afloat, hence I researched for a licensed advisors and came across someone of utmost qualifications. She's helped grow my reserve not withstanding inflation, from $275k to $850k.

    • @Morgangreen-b1l
      @Morgangreen-b1l 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      I’ve actually been looking into advisors lately, the news I’ve been seeing in the market hasn’t been so encouraging. who’s the person guiding you?

    • @KingRoh-t8h
      @KingRoh-t8h 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Certainly, there are a handful of experts in the field. I've experimented with a few over the past years, but I've stuck with DIANA CASTEEL LYNCH for about five years now, and her performance has been consistently impressive. She’s quite known in her field, look-her up.

    • @Morgangreen-b1l
      @Morgangreen-b1l 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Thanks a lot for this suggestion. I needed this myself, I looked her up on web, and I have sent her an email. I hope she gets back to me soon.

  • @jillburton6041
    @jillburton6041 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

    Thank you!!! FINALLY!!! Reduce Gov spending of our taxes and preserving Social Security, Military, etc, spending.

    • @MusouInken
      @MusouInken 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Non-discretionary spending (social security, medicare/medicaid, and interest on the debt) makes up about three quarters of annual spending. About half of the discretionary part, which is the part that congress argues over every year, goes to the department of defense. The remaining half of a quarter runs _every other federal government function._
      The discretionary budget is 1.7T. The current budget deficit is 1.8T.
      Musk comes from an environment where things like payroll are a large part of a company's outlays, but that is simply not the case for the federal government. At this point we literally can't have a balanced budget without raising revenues or cutting social security and/or medicare/medicaid.

  • @KuzKiller887
    @KuzKiller887 หลายเดือนก่อน +359

    My father (an electrican) once did some work on a local military base where they had several helicopters running idle on the tarmac. He asked someone why they were just sitting there running and they said "they need to use up the fuel becuase if they dont then they wont get the funding for it next year."

    • @jancoscholtz
      @jancoscholtz 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

      Wooooowwww wtf!

    • @lloyd3404
      @lloyd3404 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +12

      In some Australian government departments this was true - they spent beyond their budgets (unplanned, unapproved) and then used that as their baseline for arguing for money in the next financial year.

    • @nikok665
      @nikok665 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Musk’s plan doesn’t touch military spending

    • @joycewebster1060
      @joycewebster1060 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Wow, just wow.

    • @thatgui88
      @thatgui88 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      Yeah and then if you find out they are using it irresponsibly and cut the budget people will say you are anti military lol

  • @elterga6224
    @elterga6224 หลายเดือนก่อน +519

    As a federal employee, I can tell you the amount of money essentially thrown away is staggering. Price gouging, misallocation of funds, and trying to spend the entire budget are some of the biggest leaks in money.

    • @canadianstacker
      @canadianstacker หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      As a federal employee how will you feel when Elon decides to cut your department and eliminate your job?

    • @GamerKnight-os1ot
      @GamerKnight-os1ot หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      ​@@canadianstackerIf he's one of the few competent employees, I'm sure he will be fine.

    • @elterga6224
      @elterga6224 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      @@canadianstacker I doubt Elon is going to cut the army out of the budget 😂

    • @lauraclark4542
      @lauraclark4542 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Also just don’t add any more employees offer retirement

    • @canadianstacker
      @canadianstacker หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@elterga6224 Since the new administration is going to rely upon the military for deportations, I suppose Trump & Musk are going to ask you to round up migrants and deport them. Enjoy the screams of crying children & the anguish of distressed parents. But at least you'll still have a job & it won't get eliminated.

  • @skeetercreek6455
    @skeetercreek6455 หลายเดือนก่อน +769

    I've got about 15 coworkers at a school district that could be cut with no noticeable impact. 1st one on the list is the budget manager who makes 200,000 a year and gets 6000 yearly raises, while telling cleaning staff to use less cleaner because it's not in the budget. Its run just like our government. POORLY

    • @talloak051
      @talloak051 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Um the budget manager is probably one of the most important employees on staff, fool

    • @edwardeno1314
      @edwardeno1314 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      It's run just like our government, because a school district is part of the government, they are funded by local, state, and federal tax monies.

    • @skeetercreek6455
      @skeetercreek6455 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

      @@talloak051 you must know him pretty well

    • @scottfoote3758
      @scottfoote3758 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

      I am retired civil servant supervisor of over 250 people. Concur 100% 10-20% of the people could be fired and have absolutly no impact.... In fact getting them out of the way would probably make the others who actually work become more efficient by not carry the dead weight of the first 20%.

    • @JaeohnEspheras
      @JaeohnEspheras หลายเดือนก่อน +46

      ​@@talloak051 a budget manager isnt worth 200K.

  • @MsBizzyGurl
    @MsBizzyGurl 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +25

    Drop Congressional salaries to the median income of their constituency. It'll bring a level of reality to spending.

    • @EricFixalot
      @EricFixalot 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Underrated comment

    • @allthatsheiz
      @allthatsheiz 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Welp I can’t say this isn’t worth a try

  • @CH-es4up
    @CH-es4up หลายเดือนก่อน +537

    I am a government employee. The inefficiency in government is truly unbelievable. So much waste. I work in public safety with aviation. I use equipment that is older than I am (and I am closer to retirement than the start of my career). Better equipment and methods exist, but procurement and onboarding is a joke.

    • @SilurKrita-km4pi
      @SilurKrita-km4pi หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      The problem is that money is debt and the debfiatmoney are usually created by private banks.
      They then ontop add interest like 4%.
      But the never created that 4%.
      It makes a shortage of money going around that we are still expected to find working 2jobs scraping by.
      Pretty evil ,but smart.

    • @DerpLvIAsian
      @DerpLvIAsian หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      i can't believe im saying this, but the creation of this department gave me actual hope for the United States government

    • @lvyumn
      @lvyumn หลายเดือนก่อน

      If your loosing money you better find a way to stop the bleeding or your out of business.
      Chinas infrastructure is only 35 years old while American infrastructure is over 150 years. Some people want you to think that Chinas bldg practices are unsafe because they dont have the safety standards, untrue.
      Their not held back by unions, their people are eager to work.

    • @waynecarson8635
      @waynecarson8635 หลายเดือนก่อน

      TREASURY will create and use DEBT FREE US NOTES as was done by Lincoln and during Revolutionary War, Jackson paid off the debt 1837 only time in history a major power paid its Debt.
      Notes will be tokenized and digitized, maturing bonds will be paid with this new form of DEBTCFREE money.
      30% of debt is due in the next TWO YEARS this is why THEY let Trump win ! But he will fu@k them like Jackson did. 70%+ of debt will be paid in four years!❤

    • @user-rh4hc4hj1z
      @user-rh4hc4hj1z หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      So thankful to God I don't live in America.

  • @Bootiehunta92
    @Bootiehunta92 หลายเดือนก่อน +1515

    I saw a video where we paid 90,000 for a bag of bolts from one of our military contractors. We need to change that shit too.

    • @jaymarcase9737
      @jaymarcase9737 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s one mechanism the government uses to get tax payer money to support secret operations. Pay $90,000 for a $5,000 bag of bolts and the $85,000 delta goes to the secret op.

    • @Flaminghotfire666
      @Flaminghotfire666 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

      source and proof?

    • @jeffystevens
      @jeffystevens หลายเดือนก่อน +85

      Good question, i can't answer it, but i can confirm i saw that video too.

    • @accuratealloys
      @accuratealloys หลายเดือนก่อน +87

      There are reasons.
      Required inspections, certain alloys, specific dimensions with very high tolerances and so on. It’s not a bag of drywall screws.

    • @Southerneng
      @Southerneng หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      ​@Flaminghotfire666 it was a video on the senate floor

  • @Northmanson1066
    @Northmanson1066 หลายเดือนก่อน +2066

    I’m a US Army veteran and I have served 21 years in federal civil service. I can say it’s an absolute fact that 1/3 of federal employees do all the work, 1/3 do the bare minimum, and 1/3 does nothing at all. It’s nearly impossible to fire a federal employee and this is the number one factor causing inefficiency!

    • @sexton824
      @sexton824 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This happens in all companies

    • @msihcs8171
      @msihcs8171 หลายเดือนก่อน +108

      1/3? My experience is FAR less than 1/3 of employees do all of the work . . . more like 1/8th and don't forget that the people at the top of each agency make the most and do the least

    • @zombizombi
      @zombizombi หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can fire ALL employees and not save the money Elon is trying to save - not even close. He's going to take it from you, not the government.

    • @Stepphenn
      @Stepphenn หลายเดือนก่อน +51

      I work in the private sector and layoffs always scare me. People I know who work in government always say "Get a federal job, you'll be set for life and you won't be scared of layoffs." I see why now. Their employer can just print money no matter if they're hitting their metrics or not.

    • @cujo1050
      @cujo1050 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      Every line of work has inefficiency. I know plenty of people who work in the military and in the federal civil service and do a fantastic job. 2 million people service in the military world wide and 4.5 million work in the civil service mostly in the US and some abroad. I have zero exposure to all 6 million of those people to breakdown who is doing their job and who is not. Doesn't mean we can stream line but we should all avoid allowing our experiences to form our opinions when our experiences don't expose us to all of the people who work within the system.

  • @JeffKnoxAZ
    @JeffKnoxAZ 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    People miss the point Elon is making. When he talks about reducing regulations, he's not (usually) talking about doing away with safety standards, financial safeguards, or environmental protections, but rather talking about removing the redundancy and overlap first, then looking at whether the remaining regulations actually serve the purpose they were intended to address and whether there might be a better approach to achieve the objectives.

  • @johenderson7786
    @johenderson7786 หลายเดือนก่อน +553

    In my opinion, one of the first steps is to get rid of ALL lobbyists. Those people are there to influence our government to spend money and usually high cost so they can get their cut. If our government needs jobs to be done, then get estimates like businesses do. Then hold those estimates to account... no changes and no over rides. Accountability on ALL sides.

    • @wilsojk
      @wilsojk หลายเดือนก่อน

      this is the only way to have true real democracy. unfortunately the powers that be are likely too entrenched within the system

    • @sm3675
      @sm3675 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      YES!!!

    • @brianlane9534
      @brianlane9534 หลายเดือนก่อน +72

      Lobbying is a fancy name for bribery .

    • @moviemakers2025
      @moviemakers2025 หลายเดือนก่อน

      it’s impossible

    • @skbskb7596
      @skbskb7596 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lobbiyists are not employed by government, Lobbists are hired by "for profit" companies to disaduage the congress to pass any regulations, so that they can loot the public. That said, you can not eliminate Lobbists, but if you bring in transparency to Governance, then the size of the Lobbist pool shrinks.

  • @bren.r
    @bren.r หลายเดือนก่อน +375

    I used to work for a government contractor. For a period of 2-3 months, I got paid to sit and pretty much do nothing as the project had no direction and they needed to allocate somebody to burn through the rest of the contract's funds. It felt so morally wrong and I had the itch to do things that wouldn't just end up sitting on a shelf to collect dust, so I quit and have zero regrets. Income tax is just a vehicle for the government to needlessly spend.

    • @FloppimusMaximus
      @FloppimusMaximus หลายเดือนก่อน

      8 TRILLION under tRump. Not just COVID, 1.7 TRILLION per year.

    • @schonsospaet22
      @schonsospaet22 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Everywhere the same...

    • @porthosduvallon5301
      @porthosduvallon5301 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      So you worked for a company committing fraud but chose not to report it

    • @sithlordbinks
      @sithlordbinks หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@porthosduvallon5301 Exactly haha this guy scammed the government

    • @bren.r
      @bren.r หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      @@porthosduvallon5301 what fraud? Do you know how government funding works?
      The concept of burning through a budget for more funding in following years is precisely why there is so much waste.
      The government is in the same bed with these contractors, so do you really think they would care to listen to somebody like myself? Haven't you seen how the government operates? Lol.

  • @DrDanielHoward
    @DrDanielHoward 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +12

    I like how Trump joked to the cameras that "Elon is so great and he has been in Mar a Lago for so long.... I cannot get rid of the guy"... lol

  • @noenduringcity
    @noenduringcity หลายเดือนก่อน +548

    We had a similar situation at the university where I work. The organization was headed for a financial cliff. They brought in a business exec who specialized in rescuing companies. He did a remarkable job getting the finances in order but this earned him the wrath of the faculty and he was driven off in less than a year. Everyone hated him but he saved the university and got in a position so that, during COVID, no one lost their jobs. This was only possible because people were FORCED to change. No one wants to give up anything for themselves EVER, but sometimes it's the only way to avoid bankruptcy.

    • @rm-gh1co
      @rm-gh1co หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      I decided to scale down when I couldn't get a decent job, and went into retirement. I did the numbers and decided how much I could spend each day. I gave up cable TV, expensive lattes, went to a cell phone plan that that had a hotspot to run a smart TV, movie subscriptions, and took a chance giving up house insurance. Watched the sales and bought accordingly. Do my own hair. Grew out my own nails, turned up the heat in the house and found out I never got sick so I had no medical costs. Paid off my house early so I have no mortgage interest costs. I rarely give two charities but I tip 20 to 25% to servers because they are working. And I always tip the gas station attendant because we have the option of service. If I can do it I do it. My own lawn work, some electric work. Change The light bulbs and filters in the car. In other words, I looked at each expenditure and whether I could reduce it or eliminate it. Here I am almost two decades later and I have no debt. I don't pay interest on anything. I've saved tens of thousands of dollars So I can buy the next car in cash if I need to. When I go shopping I look at other people's carts and the trash that they buy to strew around their houses which will be in a landfill before long. I don't do that. I just got voted on the the board of the HOA. Now I am looking at every line item of the expenditures, the budget And I see a lot of waste.... to pare down or eliminate.

    • @IdahoCountry-m4c
      @IdahoCountry-m4c หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rm-gh1co I sure wish this was just about the economy!! I do all of the things you do and have for 50 years, but I am still just living comfortably and will soon have my home paid off. I still have home insurance and property taxes to pay however. Counseling people to do without insurance can produce devastating results. Just because you are lucky doesn't mean that disasters don't happen to others. I am just as concerned about the dictatorship that is transforming in this country. While we are all worrying about the price of eggs the Orange God is destroying our separation of government and wants to cripple us on the world stage with isolationism. Face it, we are part of the big picture, the world. Sticking our heads in the sand and pretending nothing surrounding us matters will someday come right to our door steps.

    • @michaelsmith4904
      @michaelsmith4904 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      "took a chance giving up house insurance. "

    • @bzh7648
      @bzh7648 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@michaelsmith4904here, we have too many tornadoes. If your weather is stable there, I guess you can do it.

    • @chesspwn7457
      @chesspwn7457 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Yup, it's a leader's job to make the tough decisions that are best for the long term even if they hurt now. Fixing things is never easy, else we'd have already fixed it.

  • @JediObiDave
    @JediObiDave หลายเดือนก่อน +1012

    Gov has known about their excess spending always. They just have politicians who are getting paid to look the other way and ignore it while they get rich and the american tax payer goes broke.

    • @OIllllO
      @OIllllO หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @JediObiDave
      Yep and when this country fails they will have the money to leave.

    • @uncle-bin1750
      @uncle-bin1750 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      The country has serious problems which need money to be fixed. The one thing that is seriously bloated regarding the US federal budget is the department of defence. Take your time and look at the federal budget and ask yourself: "where do we need to spend more and where could we save a little bit?"
      You could cut the defense budget by 1% and alsmost double the budget for "national science foundation" or the EPA without spending a dime more than before.

    • @ShinyTurd1
      @ShinyTurd1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And now you will have trump, musk, and many others getting paid to regulate their businesses. Fox in charge of the henhouse.

    • @sten260
      @sten260 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      well obviously because there is no negative consequence to them personally if they waste money, they get paid either way so why not just do it

    • @kimloy8019
      @kimloy8019 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      The hilarious things about your comment is even if the US Gov can reduce its deficit to the point of actually gaining a surplus, and then use that surplus to pay back debt its not going to benefit you in the slightest.

  • @calebplumleeoutdoors
    @calebplumleeoutdoors หลายเดือนก่อน +694

    Government: "Hey, we took about 30% of your income and we wasted that money already... give us more money for these bonds and we'll do better??"

    • @DamianJablonski-li2rw
      @DamianJablonski-li2rw หลายเดือนก่อน

      60% of the bonds go towards people’s retirements. I don’t think you musk lovers actually understand how the government debt works

    • @l3vi23
      @l3vi23 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      No they pay you interest if you buy bonds you do it to make money.

    • @annemariesmith5459
      @annemariesmith5459 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly. Elon's brilliant plan is to automate the government after firing 80% of the staff. This is technocracy on crack. A lot of people work for the federal government. The quickest way to UBI and complete control is through this bozo.

    • @ndenise3460
      @ndenise3460 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Worst part of it is the outflow due to interest in the accumulated debt.

    • @danieldavismusic
      @danieldavismusic หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      I wish they only took 30%.

  • @gavinkelso5271
    @gavinkelso5271 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    Maybe the best structure for talking about politics unbiased. All of these people in Trumps 2nd administration deserve more transparent media like this. Incredibly informative, wonderful video lad 👏

  • @mikeransom1168
    @mikeransom1168 หลายเดือนก่อน +534

    If the gov collects 35% of its revenue from social security taxes and spends 22% on the people who pay those taxers, how is it possible to run out of money to pay social security recipients? Unless, of course, that social security revenue is being spent on other programs.

    • @stevengayler8447
      @stevengayler8447 หลายเดือนก่อน +72

      Social security goes straight into the general fund and mostly just pays interest in the debt.

    • @lordderpington8021
      @lordderpington8021 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      They take more social security than they give because it is supposed to go back to american taxpayers after they retire. A 401k works similarly but it is entirely privatized and optional and allows you to influence it whenever you want.

    • @lindasc-m5917
      @lindasc-m5917 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      The Social Security trust fund lent its excess to the Treasury while boomers were still working. The Treasury is repaying this loan now. Social Security taxes (FICA) are not enough to pay benefits now. Once the loan has been repaid, Social Security will not have enough income from FICA to pay full benefits. Benefits must be reduced or taxes raised or some combination to prevent the reduction in benefits. The money wasn’t stolen. The loan is being repaid.

    • @penneyburgess5431
      @penneyburgess5431 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

      It is. In fact Social Security benefits have been used for years. At 35 I was to receive $1340 a month retired at 60. Now the projection is at 75 my retirement will be (if I live that long) $550. My mother in law was paid the same amount for working for 6 months at a $1.50 an hour. Every American who has put money in all their lives have been robbed blind.

    • @KevinSmith-qi5yn
      @KevinSmith-qi5yn หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      They broke out Social Security and Medicare under the spending but combined them with payroll taxes. Add them up, its 36% being spent on Social Security and Medicare.

  • @tammypickurel6697
    @tammypickurel6697 หลายเดือนก่อน +178

    While a US Marine, I worked on radios and antennas, a lot of the items we could fabricate from parts on hand especially the antennas. The cost savings would have been in some cases 90% but we were not allowed to. In one case the part we would have fabricated would have been better more durable and would lasted longer. The part we were forced to use was designed to break to force replacement. Just to light to do the job. Each antenna needed 3 to be set up. Cables had to be at least 50 feet long or was scrapped, if damaged could not cut or splice had to toss. And yes we had to totally spend budget or it would be cut the following year.

    • @stubbs4443
      @stubbs4443 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      No wonder they broke on us so much in the field. Damn.

    • @awesomeface246
      @awesomeface246 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      I was in ATC communications in the Marines. We had 5-10x markups on basic items like tools and hardware you could get from a Home Depot which really has nothing to do with safety. Granted by the time i got out they had shifted most everything to unfixable and need to be returned to the contracted vendor to replace. I don't know how the contractor relationships work, and I understand some of these supplies are extremely specific and need to be marked up since they aren't sold to anyone else but the military, but at a certain point their needs to be SOME amount of care for how tax dollars are spent.

    • @sams5055
      @sams5055 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      thanks for that story and your service. It's always great hearing firsthand stories of how corrupt our government has become, even when faced with common sense like you presented.

    • @WildHorses9958
      @WildHorses9958 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That's the way it's done with most companies. If you don't use up your budget this year, it will get cut for next year! That's how the bean counters think.They have an incentive to do so. that is capitalism, maybe not at its best!

    • @geechyguy3441
      @geechyguy3441 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yea we can definitely cut some defense spending and be totally safe from foreign threats as we stand - we have so much buffer time incase war actually looms

  • @JohnDaniels
    @JohnDaniels หลายเดือนก่อน +569

    "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless" - Thomas Jefferson

    • @bigbeefjoedaddy
      @bigbeefjoedaddy หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Facts

    • @AdamVassGal
      @AdamVassGal หลายเดือนก่อน +39

      How spot on was TJ? He nailed it.

    • @Galactis1
      @Galactis1 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      Happening already.

    • @GrannyGrace
      @GrannyGrace หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      His words from the countries founding are becoming more and more true every year. I’m 100% with him anti-federalism is the way we should have gone

    • @jasonowen4979
      @jasonowen4979 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, and we've just elected two billionaires who come from the corporate world and own lots of property. Americans just sold their future to Musk.

  • @SuperTommieNL
    @SuperTommieNL 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    The spending compared to GDP is not high. The tax income is low

  • @kortyEdna825
    @kortyEdna825 หลายเดือนก่อน +668

    The US economy cannot survive without continuous credit and debt creation. The FED will print more money and the average American will go just that much further in debt. Meanwhile, foreigners lust for the greenback. Their economies are in worse condition than the US... if that's even possible. Someone is going to be left holding the bag...

    • @PatrickFitzgerald-cx6io
      @PatrickFitzgerald-cx6io หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Gold might crash in a liquidity crunch, but many precious metal holders are prepared for this and unlikely to be forced sellers. The paper market would tank and possibly collapse. Hearing from an experienced investor who has overcome adversity is motivating. It can be scary when your portfolio turns red, but if you've invested in strong companies, stick to your goals and continue growing them

    • @foden700
      @foden700 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I wholeheartedly concur; I'm 60 years old, just retired, and have about $1,250,000 in non-retirement assets. Compared to the whole value of my portfolio during the last three years, I have no debt and a very little amount of money in retirement accounts. To be completely honest, the information provided by invt-advisors can only be ignored but not neglected. Simply undertake research to choose a trustworthy one.

    • @NoorJari406
      @NoorJari406 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Impressive can you share more info?

    • @foden700
      @foden700 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Certainly, there are a handful of experts in the field. I've experimented with a few over the past years, but I've stuck with ‘’Aileen Gertrude Tippy’’ for about five years now, and her performance has been consistently impressive.She’s quite known in her field, look-her up.

    • @NoorJari406
      @NoorJari406 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks a lot for this suggestion. I needed this myself, I looked her up, and I have sent her an email. I hope she gets back to me soon.

  • @Tixolax
    @Tixolax หลายเดือนก่อน +472

    As European I dont understan why the US has so much debt. No public healthcare, no parental leave, no long sick leave, old infrastructure…..where is the money going

    • @eugenesteinbeck9469
      @eugenesteinbeck9469 หลายเดือนก่อน +117

      We spend about $3 trillion a year between Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security, adding up to nearly half of all USFG expenditures. The Pentagon, VA, and DHS together eat up more than $1 trillion. In other words, about 2/3rds of the budget goes to either entitlement spending or "national security".

    • @Mrlorop
      @Mrlorop หลายเดือนก่อน +70

      @@eugenesteinbeck9469 its interesting that youve forgotten about military spend

    • @zanderdev57
      @zanderdev57 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

      Money is largely wasted because of budget cut fears. There is a "use it or lose it" mentality with budgets, and they are also grossly inflated because companies that sell to the government usually get some kind of exclusive contract that allows them to mark up prices by exorbitant amounts. A single trash bag could cost the government 5 dollars or more because of these contracts

    • @0x3Jimmy
      @0x3Jimmy หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      We need to cut wasteful spending on nato

    • @MajorSquiggles
      @MajorSquiggles หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      It gets put into public services that most people will never benefit from and are so grossly mismanaged that it bleeds money. It all goes into bureaucracy, paying people to put a stamp on things. The money that does reach people goes to single mothers who don't have to work or produce anything because the government pays them to stay home. These people don't pay taxes because they don't make any income but we will gladly pay to feed them, house them, and get free iphones. It's both the government spending money just to spend money, and half our population paying the other half to not work. People think that just because we don't have public healthcare like the EU that there aren't public options or networks. That's simply not the case. We give an enormous amount of money to people, most aren't even US citizens. We import millions and millions of illegals every year and pay for free housing, free food, free utilities, and sometimes vote in federal elections.

  • @henrystevenson4837
    @henrystevenson4837 หลายเดือนก่อน +489

    I’m from the UK and I’ve had 3 government jobs. Most days I did about 30 mins work. Not exaggerating I promise you. The government love wasting money

    • @123456789bassy1
      @123456789bassy1 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      Same here in Canada. I use a gov job to do my school work while getting my degree since there's nothing to do.

    • @MC---
      @MC--- หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Ron Swanson is that you?

    • @tomheeks2830
      @tomheeks2830 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      no you didn't.

    • @sharkfinsurfchannel
      @sharkfinsurfchannel หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      No difference at most construction sites

    • @elsol1176
      @elsol1176 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Yooo, keep it down. We have a good thing here

  • @wolfsangelnz2267
    @wolfsangelnz2267 3 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    Well Done , dude. STAKE. Priceless, seems you have spoken with my Son. Daniel. . I have told him , how I stumbled over your channel.

  • @beatyeyes
    @beatyeyes หลายเดือนก่อน +367

    If there are concerns about Musk being in charge of regulations because he owns businesses, shouldn't that same argument be used for our members of congress that buy and sell stocks? 🤔

    • @chriskearns1062
      @chriskearns1062 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

      Congress voted to keep themselves doing that not insider trading. They also voted against term limits. Wonder why?

    • @tesladrew2608
      @tesladrew2608 หลายเดือนก่อน +65

      Both are bad. Two wrongs don't make a right

    • @Inceptionxg
      @Inceptionxg หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      We are building our product which is inkless printers and we are seeking for a Investment.
      I think most people never thought about inkless printers.

    • @ryanvenjoyer
      @ryanvenjoyer หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      *Through family members mostly.
      And yes, both are bad. It'd be great if people were more consistent on this issue.

    • @johnholtforth9081
      @johnholtforth9081 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Many in congress have gotten rich by having insider info. Look at people like Pelosi who make a fortune in the markets with this info. Just be ready for all the resistance to doing these things. The old saying- if you want to get rich, start a business. If you want to get really rich become a politician in government.

  • @TechnicalParadox
    @TechnicalParadox หลายเดือนก่อน +208

    It's absolutely insane to talk about him having a vested interest and affecting policy when our entire government is set up that way through politicians being lobbied by corporations and their money

    • @illuminatedzach4206
      @illuminatedzach4206 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Literally so true should be top commenr

    • @illuminatedzach4206
      @illuminatedzach4206 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Elon will never even consider raising corporate tax. It’s a selfish world where the rich create the game

    • @lynettekirk6157
      @lynettekirk6157 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Just goes to show nothing is going to get better, just more of the illusion

    • @jobhiojkp
      @jobhiojkp หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      BTW, I don't see anyone here naming the last president who gave us a budget surplus.

    • @djcruz25
      @djcruz25 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jobhiojkpClinton

  • @breakthrough8628
    @breakthrough8628 หลายเดือนก่อน +506

    Departments that don’t spend their entire yearly budget should be rewarded not penalized with lesser budget next year. This will promote fiscal responsibility, who agrees?

    • @raterman4624
      @raterman4624 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      Elon Musk, he actually literally said this during the "if they know they will get fired, they will instantly spend your money more wisely" part, i think it was right after that, but not shown in this video

    • @elasticharmony
      @elasticharmony หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      No cutting a budget is not a reward, he plans to cut out the whole department, much better.

    • @suomynona4607
      @suomynona4607 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      @@raterman4624 Who determines "more wisely". Mush spent $44B for something that's now worth $9B. He doesn't seem that wise.

    • @Malthanos
      @Malthanos หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@suomynona4607You vastly underestimate the value of X. You are only looking at it from a dollar perspective. The information that can be found on X is far more varied and uncensored. If you had two books, one without censorship that had every detail or the same book with all the negative information censored.... Which one would you read?

    • @frankstrawnation
      @frankstrawnation หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      ​@@suomynona4607He became the most important person in the world after Trump. IMO, the money was very well spent. Besides, he still the richest man alive.

  • @Superslotter1970
    @Superslotter1970 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I like Elon‘s plan. This is a great video. You explained things very fairly and accurately. Thank you.

  • @Joegolberg1
    @Joegolberg1 หลายเดือนก่อน +1558

    Small taxes can affect investment decisions such as whether to choose tax-free municipal bonds over taxable bonds or do a Roth IRA conversion. I’ve been sitting on over $745K equity from a home sale and I want to invest on the stock market, how do I achieve this without being taxed twice?

    • @TilSchweiger-i3f
      @TilSchweiger-i3f หลายเดือนก่อน

      Indeed, I did make use of a financial counselor. As I get closer to retirement, their advice has been really helpful. I thought compound interest on index funds wouldn't be sufficient because I started late. It's amusing how I've done better than colleagues who have more years of investment experience. I've profited more than $886k tax free.

    • @Benjaminarmstrong684
      @Benjaminarmstrong684 หลายเดือนก่อน

      this is definitely considerable! think you could suggest any professional/advisors i can get on the phone with? i'm in dire need of proper portfolio allocation

    • @TilSchweiger-i3f
      @TilSchweiger-i3f หลายเดือนก่อน

      GREGORY LEO CATTEL is the licensed FA I work with, I can't speak much about him you should make a search with his name, you'd find the necessary details to schedule an appointment.

    • @Joegolberg1
      @Joegolberg1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      he appears to be well-educated and well-read. I ran a Google search for his name and came across his website; thank you for sharing.

  • @andrewbarton2
    @andrewbarton2 หลายเดือนก่อน +217

    36 trillion in debt and 345 million people. That's over 100K per person or 500k for a couple with 3 kids! It's absolutely ridiculous. If it is not paid down AND the USD loses it's reserve currency status, the USA will become a banana republic.

    • @tesladrew2608
      @tesladrew2608 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      So basically a mortgage, depending on where you live

    • @Andytlp
      @Andytlp หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@tesladrew2608 I guess americans spend well beyond their means. I dont get how some broke person decides to go on a 3 week long vacation for 10 grand on credit. Why. Did they make some valuable interpersonal connections thatll get them work/business opportunities? No. Its sheer stupidity.

    • @fie1329
      @fie1329 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Donald puts the reserve currency status at risk with high import taxes. The other countries will stop exporting goods to the US and are no longer interested in holding dollar. This will happen sooner than most people expect. And it will be devastating. I have no illusions about this.

    • @patriciapage2109
      @patriciapage2109 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      They probably want to feel normal for a second instead of like a pauper. NOYB anyways. ​@@Andytlp

    • @Yamyatos
      @Yamyatos หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, but Trump and Musk wont solve that issue.. it's not their problem. They are in it for the tax cuts for billionaires, and deregulating the stuff that annoys them. Typical selfish, narcicistic billionaires. And america voted them to be in charge. Like, holy hell, why.

  • @bobthebagger
    @bobthebagger หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    I once worked for the FAA (can’t say why) but they needed to hit their government budget quota for the year so this one building spent 7 million for us to build something in a completely unused corner of a hallway. Government is so wasteful these days. Lets cut it up!

  • @nitesh-maharaj
    @nitesh-maharaj 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Well done on the balanced view. I’m subscribing because of this. Keep the un-opinionated facts coming.

  • @WSeabrookLightTouch
    @WSeabrookLightTouch หลายเดือนก่อน +78

    How amazing would it be for US news agencies to report this sanely and analytically? No bias, no spin, thoughtful summary of the facts and open ended questions relevant to the topic. And the deluge of comments from federal employees make it clear there's a productive way forward here.

    • @ReviewBoard-uy5nv
      @ReviewBoard-uy5nv หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They do, but it doesn’t make money since no one watches it. News is all about making money, getting views, advertising

    • @tagcoriolis1029
      @tagcoriolis1029 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@ReviewBoard-uy5nv So Elon Musk creates massive unemployment then says, all you NASA scientists can bring your hardware and intellectual property to Space X, all you unemployed bureaucrats can learn to install Tesla power walls, all you unemployed FBI and CIA can work for my personal security service. All hail Emperor Musk! ( cue the Darth Vader music)

    • @ChoppaAutomatic
      @ChoppaAutomatic 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Fr it’s literally crazy asf to think people from other countries report our news better than we do 😭

  • @bell191991
    @bell191991 หลายเดือนก่อน +902

    Unless your country is at war, it should never run a budget deficit.
    There is no excuse for debt. Pay for it with tax revenue, or go without until you can afford it.

    • @rogerfroud300
      @rogerfroud300 หลายเดือนก่อน +64

      Yes, but every Government promises 'investment' on things that people want, so they effectively buy their vote. People are never told that this 'investment' is actually borrowed money. If the people knew the truth, they might act differently.

    • @grumpy3517
      @grumpy3517 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is why they are starting another war now... (China or Russia or both)

    • @geraldmerkowitz4360
      @geraldmerkowitz4360 หลายเดือนก่อน +141

      "There is no excuse for debt" national debt is a major economic driver and a baseline product of our financial system, a country with absolutely zero debt is catastrophic for the economy...
      You Americans like to call yourselves capitalist but you have zero idea on how it works on a technical level

    • @PrivateCh123
      @PrivateCh123 หลายเดือนก่อน +74

      @@geraldmerkowitz4360 Ignorance on macroeconomics is absolutely appalling, especially along willingness to "teach" others. I stopped watching at the point where he said gov't debt is the same as personal debt.

    • @majmun182
      @majmun182 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      the us is constantly at war tho

  • @calebplumleeoutdoors
    @calebplumleeoutdoors หลายเดือนก่อน +245

    Me: "Can I pay my mortgage with my credit card to earn points?"
    Government: "Hell no! You can't pay debt with debt!"
    Government: 👀

    • @forbiddenyang
      @forbiddenyang หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Rich dad poor dad logic😮

    • @leif_9538
      @leif_9538 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You can refinance your credit. Thats also a pretty smart thing to do when interest rates are low.

    • @BobBobbingham-c5t
      @BobBobbingham-c5t หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      No, but you can open a line of credit and use that to pay off your mortgage

    • @renzokukeng1776
      @renzokukeng1776 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are companies you can use.
      They pay your rent with their bank plus a fee and you pay them back with a rewards cc and pocket the difference. Look it up, run some numbers, see if it's worth it.

    • @renzokukeng1776
      @renzokukeng1776 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are middleman companies out there. They pay your rent plus a fee. You pay them with your rewards card. And you pocket the difference. Seriously. Look it up and run some numbers if it's worth it.

  • @bricemorrison8458
    @bricemorrison8458 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    The biggest problem which I haven’t seen anyone address is that cutting all of these agencies is only reducing the top tiny sliver of that deficit graph. Where are the cuts going to come from to find the $2 trillion of savings?

    • @karleells6540
      @karleells6540 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Start by cutting 30% of every federal budget.

    • @JacquesofAllTrades-l4x
      @JacquesofAllTrades-l4x วันที่ผ่านมา

      DoD, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid add up to $4 Trillion. To cut $2 Trillion you have to cut all of the rest. Don't even think of cutting SS or Medicare with their own funding streams.

  • @drmangrum
    @drmangrum หลายเดือนก่อน +270

    His comment about paper work taking longer to accomplish than the actual work.
    I'm a contractor for the army and part of team moving a legacy application to the cloud. We've been ready to go into production for nearly a year, but we have to go through all kinds of meetings for various regulatory guidelines. Most of those guidelines are horribly out of date, but we still have to meet them... Just because some bureaucrat says we do.

    • @avocadoarmadillo7031
      @avocadoarmadillo7031 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      On the flip side, the security ramifications of moving on premises applications to the cloud are massive, especially when we're talking about a DoD application. Some bureaucrat also puts in place the sensible regulations regarding code review.

    • @Twinjeremy
      @Twinjeremy หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I also do contract work for the gov, the procurement process is incredibly bureaucratic and takes FOREVER often 10 times longer than the actual time the project will take to get done

    • @FAK_CHEKR
      @FAK_CHEKR หลายเดือนก่อน

      I contracted for the Air Force. I did the layout on a chip that never was intended to work. I don’t know how many man months were used to design it and do layout. When I inquired as to why we were doing this, the only answer I got was that we were checking off a box to satisfy a contract.
      The I/O pins were done by another guy, who had to learn on the fly about how to do that. He said they were woefully inadequate as he didn’t have enough space to do it right. He then got on a plane to go show the chip to some group in Chapel Hill, I think. They only looked at some of the layout, not his pins.
      There never was any intention to power it up. The SENSORS LABORATORY here at WPAFB in Dayton Ohio fabricated the chip and encased it in a fancy glass display with a plaque that proudly proclaimed how many transistors were on this chip - that did absolutely nothing and never was intended to.

    • @FrozenElite926
      @FrozenElite926 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The paperwork used to not exist as badly as it does now. The Reagan admin's obsession with governmental accountability means that every pencil mark a government employee uses be identifiable and traceable. Like the uncertainty principle, you can have a detailed thorough accounting of everything the government does, or a cheaper operation of government, you cannot have both. Being accountable requires extra man hours and that means money.

    • @drmangrum
      @drmangrum หลายเดือนก่อน

      @FrozenElite926 except I think the deep state took that idea of recording information for accountability purposes and took it to an extreme to create such a mountain of documentation that it becomes useless as it's impossible to sift through it all. To complicate matters much of documentation will be contradictory since each person filling it out will have different priorities.

  • @stevehoule1370
    @stevehoule1370 หลายเดือนก่อน +81

    No one in government seems to have any accountability for being inefficient ... that has to change!

    • @northdakotaham1752
      @northdakotaham1752 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Where is the incentive to improve? The only incentive they have is to grow larger.

    • @carsonrush3352
      @carsonrush3352 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      The regulators also don't have to prove a regulation helps before passing it. They only have to "do something! Do anything!"

    • @johnwietfeldt6238
      @johnwietfeldt6238 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The US congress is responsible, they hold the purse, no one else. Musk has no responsibility and no power.

    • @bartduynstee1577
      @bartduynstee1577 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      the problem is, everybody is always looking at the small employees as the guilty ones, but that is simply not true. they have no choice but to follow the system, laid out for them and it is not their call to change anything about it.

  • @markglynn9333
    @markglynn9333 หลายเดือนก่อน +86

    My father worked for the VA when I was 10 I took a pencil out of his briefcase, he said put it back that’s Federal property. We need more of that kind of thinking and respect for other people’s money

    • @Papatabb69
      @Papatabb69 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      by that logic, we as Social Security Numbers are Federal property 🤣🤣
      your pops seemed like an honest man that being said. We do need more people with such integrity, and especially as governing bodies.

    • @teddyrva2779
      @teddyrva2779 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Good man. That pencil probably cost taxpayers about 8 grand.

  • @misterpixen
    @misterpixen 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    i appreciate the non biased look and explanations as opposed to other youtubers that just completely write off everything trump does or the ones that just suck on the knob. very insightful

  • @Anonymous_Lee19
    @Anonymous_Lee19 หลายเดือนก่อน +154

    It's good to solve these "efficiency" problems as soon as possible, instead of letting them snowball.
    Many politicians have the bad habit of pushing problems to the next person.

    • @danpowell3953
      @danpowell3953 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Republicans in Congress did practically NOTHING their whole career in Congress. So maybe getting rid of many of those would help.

    • @thecrackin-u8p
      @thecrackin-u8p หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Lmao they have snowballed for DECADES

    • @goatfromhell666
      @goatfromhell666 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Like the guy before the current administration did?

    • @bilbobagend8155
      @bilbobagend8155 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@goatfromhell6662016 Trump's entire cabinet were neocons trying to undermine him every step of the way. This time around, his cabinet picks are all people aligned with him, and with both the house and senate backing him, the safeguards are gone and he can do whatever he wants.
      Whether or not it actually amounts to anything, I guess we'll see in the coming years.

    • @KevinSmith-qi5yn
      @KevinSmith-qi5yn หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      The modern politician's job is not to solve problems. It's to get elected. Their team will be the ones writing legislation and deciding how the politician votes.

  • @JohnDaniels
    @JohnDaniels หลายเดือนก่อน +100

    I worked in government for 22 years and the amount of waste that I seen was absolutely unbelievable. There's a lot of hard-working good employees but then there is enormous amount of waste, this is a good thing that they're doing with DOGE.

    • @mikesway4522
      @mikesway4522 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I work for the govt know. I feel you however, I don’t see deep enough cuts in the govt. most the spending is Social Security, Healthcare and interest. There will be much backlash on cutting the first two. Baby steps I suppose

    • @curtislee5937
      @curtislee5937 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      So you was part of the problem for 22 years.

  • @infini.tesimo
    @infini.tesimo หลายเดือนก่อน +261

    I love how many Australians have taken up interest in the United States news and making content on it. It gives a different perspective as well.

    • @lextacy2008
      @lextacy2008 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How do you he is in Australia? Most likely he is in the US and came from the AU

    • @Hi_Issie
      @Hi_Issie หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      ​@@lextacy2008guess you didn't actually watch the video or look at his profile where he says he Is in Australia.

    • @lextacy2008
      @lextacy2008 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Hi_Issie In that case, he definitely shouldn't care

    • @HaloMG
      @HaloMG หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@lextacy2008 he can do whatever he wants, people still want to listen

    • @Hi_Issie
      @Hi_Issie หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@lextacy2008 I don't know how it is in Australia. But here in the US, hes allowed to say anything he wants. He doesn't need mine or your permission. And you and I can choose if we want to listen, something you've already shown where you are on that.

  • @NoneNoname-d7u
    @NoneNoname-d7u 7 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +2

    Looking from a distance keeps the reality
    Cut Trump, cut Musk, add actuaries, economists, +real attorneys who know laws

  • @BobB-w4q
    @BobB-w4q หลายเดือนก่อน +279

    You have an objective approach. I am a retired US Government financial and statistical analyst. There is no question that Musk is correct about the feasibility of material US government savings.

    • @BrklynBread
      @BrklynBread หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Bot

    • @BobB-w4q
      @BobB-w4q หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      @BrklynBread Our "left wing" has two easy answers: 1) Fascist; and 2) Bot.

    • @jefftheindianchief8279
      @jefftheindianchief8279 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@BobB-w4q The left loves their witch hunts, sorry you have to deal with morons.

    • @mintberrycrunch1752
      @mintberrycrunch1752 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BobB-w4qI am a far leftist. I think Elon might have some points that our government has some inefficiencies. However, I believe that his reduced spending will have negative effects on the American people. However, we will just have to wait and see. I am all for reducing some spending on defense and simplifying our complicated tax system, but if he tries to gut systems that help the people it won’t be a good thing

    • @squitz7056
      @squitz7056 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@BobB-w4q now im sure ur a bot

  • @lord-skinner
    @lord-skinner หลายเดือนก่อน +365

    It's a commission. It will investigate and make recommendations. If any actual deregulation happens it will be done by elected officials through congress.. He won't be able to directly change things.

    • @20thReality
      @20thReality หลายเดือนก่อน +54

      but why calling a task force like a cabinet-level department? Even more so, an acronym whose sole purpose is to troll people? Are Americans really so into being trolled by a billionaire?

    • @waltbroedner4754
      @waltbroedner4754 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And you REALLY believe that? Multi Billionare oligarchs who have all Washington DC "elected" officials in their pockets? The ones that have turned you and I into baby killers in Gaza? Just so our Military Industrial Complex oligarchs can make even more billions?

    • @lawless7859
      @lawless7859 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@TheLawWonlmfao you’re a moron if you think Musk gives a shit about money

    • @beautifulmess2023
      @beautifulmess2023 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s not a task force- it’s a new government agency. Nice way to minimize it for the weak. lol

    • @JavierGomezX
      @JavierGomezX หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      ​@@20thRealityMan, you are no fun.

  • @SimonCowWell-vb3yd
    @SimonCowWell-vb3yd หลายเดือนก่อน +155

    I wish they banned Foundations, Lobby Groups, NGOs, and Think Tanks from interfering at any level of government.

    • @rogerjohnson2562
      @rogerjohnson2562 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I wish they banned the secrecy that they all hide behind.

    • @mrbanana6464
      @mrbanana6464 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Their goal isn't actually efficiency you know, just cutting social spending so that people stay poor and removing regulations to further enrich themselves

    • @leif_9538
      @leif_9538 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I doubt musk is gonna get rid of himself. He just lobbied the future president to give him a place in his cabinet.

    • @HALLish-jl5mo
      @HALLish-jl5mo หลายเดือนก่อน

      Banning lobby groups?
      So if I want to get a harmful chemical banned, and my neighbor wants to do the same, it should be illegal for us to work on a pitch for our local politician together?

    • @TOAOM123
      @TOAOM123 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Cuz saying something is illegal prevents the government from doing anything illegal.....great plan

  • @BatmanSkates420
    @BatmanSkates420 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Congratulations on the 1 million subs 🎉

  • @OldesouthFarm
    @OldesouthFarm หลายเดือนก่อน +56

    We have to cut the money laundering as well as the waste. Contracts for the government are usually over priced and no one negotiates pricing and gets ripped off…

    • @MikeMaker851
      @MikeMaker851 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ha look at the Irish bike shed that cost 300k, the printer that's cost 2 million and the hospital that's still not done and cost us a billion euros

    • @--harry_
      @--harry_ หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You have where the gov tries to stop that also and fails. I used to sell Nextel's. I often sold to New Jersey government accounts. Like police, fire, and road departments. The state had a bid list that was updated annually. It had fixed pricing on it. So let's say I was selling them a device, it would be listed on the state list with a fixed price. I couldn't charge more for it. So in theory no more $100 rolls of toilet paper, but in true government style I couldn't charge less or I could do jail time for it. So they might have that device listed at $100 and each car charger at $25, and the case at $25, I could be selling the same thing to any Joe off the street for free, I would have to mark it up as to not worry about bribery charges.

    • @LCinc707
      @LCinc707 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The norm used to be government received all goods at whole sale. The companies were allowed to deduct the loss from taxes to even their profits out.

  • @hic7021
    @hic7021 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    The Department of Defense has failed every financial audit for the last thirty years. I work with the government and I can agree to the large amounts of waste that is rampant in the agency. The Army just paid off half a million dollars for a new combat rifle that is so riddled with problems that it has been pulled from combat units.

  • @danp7463
    @danp7463 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    Finally someone is talking about our national debt. Regardless of political party preference something needs to be done to knock down our debt. It's like paying off a credit card balance. The sooner the better.

    • @davejones8770
      @davejones8770 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yup, question is will the walk match the talk? It's easy to talk about reducing spending, closing the gap, reducing the debt. To get something actually accomplished, that's another thing.

    • @longhorn261
      @longhorn261 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@davejones8770considering we did the exact opposite of that the past 4 years... should go pretty well
      From 20 Trillion to 30 Trillion in just 4 years under the Democrats who tax their citizens indirectly through debt and inflation.

    • @robertd9850
      @robertd9850 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@davejones8770 Not really. Exposing it in the big way that Trump is doing it with Musk and Ramaswamy is really all that is needed. People will be absolutely shocked at just how much waste and lack of accountability there is and protest with their votes.

  • @swaransingh2827
    @swaransingh2827 4 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Trump, Elon and Vance are honest transparent people.

  • @kenheilbrunn4484
    @kenheilbrunn4484 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    I ran a tiny company in which each person performed the tasks he was paid for. Period. We were incredibly efficient and knocked the crap out of the competition, where inefficiency was rampid and blatantly unnecessary. All it takes is common sense and the freedom to implement it for the benefit of all.

    • @nickel0eye
      @nickel0eye หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      key word, tiny company! the federal government is a huge company, and for good reason

    • @katbrew7950
      @katbrew7950 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Cross training brings better efficiency.

    • @leif_9538
      @leif_9538 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You should try working for corporations. They have so many inefficencies. But nobody talks about them. CEOs keep them hidden to keep their big bonus checks and then bail.

    • @arbjful
      @arbjful หลายเดือนก่อน

      A tiny department cannot run an entire country. Your analogy cannot be applied to a government

  • @troywoodcock1563
    @troywoodcock1563 หลายเดือนก่อน +86

    I am a former government employee who quit after 5 years from seeing the enormous waste that my family, friends and my tax dollars were paying for. I will support anyone willing to dive into the broken system of government to find a better way.

    • @HotKooks
      @HotKooks หลายเดือนก่อน

      You quit because you’re too lazy and overweight to stand on your feet all day long. Let’s be real

  • @NicholasNeumann789
    @NicholasNeumann789 หลายเดือนก่อน +404

    Thank you for your videos... The US economy faces ongoing challenges with high inflation and tightening credit, and though a full recession is uncertain, the risk is palpable. Rate cuts, while aimed at spurring growth, come with inflationary risks, and banks are restricting consumer and corporate lending, potentially leading to deflation in asset prices. Stock markets are volatile, layoffs are increasing, and a rising unemployment rate could signal a more entrenched economic slowdown. Retail and housing sales are expected to decline further as consumer spending cools. Though certain assets like stocks and cryptocurrencies may act as hedges, they remain vulnerable to market swings, making cautious, diversified strategies essential. Through a combination of long- and short-term trading, I’ve grown my portfolio from 130k to 532k, thanks in large part to the expertise of Milton Harper, whose deep market insights have been invaluable in navigating these unpredictable financial times...

    • @NicholasNeumann789
      @NicholasNeumann789 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He mostly interacts on Telegrams, using the user-name,

    • @NicholasNeumann789
      @NicholasNeumann789 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @MiltonHarper

    • @FlorianBaer846
      @FlorianBaer846 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Milton Harper is among the best traders on the internet and I'll keep saying it every time.

    • @Lucinda-n1u
      @Lucinda-n1u หลายเดือนก่อน

      He's really good in studying the market and making a strategy and i am learning so much from him already.

    • @EdwardPrescott709
      @EdwardPrescott709 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My favorite TA man. always on the ball, honest and to the point I like his core analysis, one of the best.

  • @RubenRodriguez-lv4df
    @RubenRodriguez-lv4df 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Cutting the corrupt bureaucracy spending schemes will improve our economy

  • @robblazik7185
    @robblazik7185 หลายเดือนก่อน +73

    This is the kind of reporting we need these days, objective, fair and honest...... Good job....

  • @MrVfowler
    @MrVfowler หลายเดือนก่อน +211

    Social Security should not be shown affecting the deficit. At least as of now all social security recipient payouts is paid directly from social security deducted from working tax payers. It is not part of the deficit.

    • @Jadefox32
      @Jadefox32 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      right if only the Johnson admin hadn't dipped their hands into the Social security trust fund...

    • @Yahweh42069
      @Yahweh42069 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      That is not how it works lol

    • @ibnorml5506
      @ibnorml5506 หลายเดือนก่อน +64

      The reason Social Security is included in the debt calculation is because the Social Security fund, which by itself runs under a surplus, is routinely raided by the US Government for funds to pay other debts.

    • @EsotericDichotomy
      @EsotericDichotomy หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ibnorml5506well it’s more like the Trust Fund loans out money to the government with interest. Which adds more debt to the nation. We are literally in debt to ourselves, to foreign nations, to retirees, to future generations… we are a debt based society

    • @penitenttangent7346
      @penitenttangent7346 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Social Security is a fucker’s safety net because they refuse to save earlier for their retirement. 😂

  • @mannygee005
    @mannygee005 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    Transparency is the best idea ever. No more faking stuff, no more pretending everything is okay. Those afraid of transparency you know they're doing something shady. No more pocketing taxpayer money and getting no value out of it. Gotta get value in return.

    • @ejt321
      @ejt321 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Transparency is rarely transparency.

    • @GO-tq6hs
      @GO-tq6hs หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      yeah just like he stuck to his transparency on twitter and when he said any major platform changes would be subject to polls and votes, and then they just weren't lmao

    • @jambalaya974
      @jambalaya974 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh transparency is good? Everyone's tax record should be public information then.

    • @cherylanon5791
      @cherylanon5791 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hussein-Obama promised transparency, campaigned on it. We all know it didn't happen, the ACA passed without it ever being read by those voting for/against it, recall Pelosi's statement "you have to pass the bill to find out what's IN the bill."

    • @kelbatt7729
      @kelbatt7729 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      But your incoming president is probably the most opaque person on earth.

  • @sirsamiboi
    @sirsamiboi วันที่ผ่านมา

    I'm not sure about deregulation, but combining government agencies sounds like a brilliant idea

  • @bobinthewest8559
    @bobinthewest8559 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    Waste and inefficiency, are basically the (informal) definition of “bureaucracy”.
    This is one of the reasons there are so many who support the idea of “smaller” government.

    • @darnoc0010
      @darnoc0010 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Less bureaucracy is the basis for conservatism.

    • @Sinaeb
      @Sinaeb หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@darnoc0010 conservatism is by definition conserving things as they are

    • @darnoc0010
      @darnoc0010 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Sinaeb In this case it's conserving how it used to be. Meaning before the government got so bloated with hundreds of unregulated agencies and bureaucracy.
      American conservatism is based on conserving the rights and freedoms outlined in the constitution. Current bureaucracy has removed a lot of those rights with unlawful regulations.

    • @arbjful
      @arbjful หลายเดือนก่อน

      A smaller government cannot take on extra jobs, you need to create more departments for that, thus defeating the very purpose of conservatism

    • @darnoc0010
      @darnoc0010 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@arbjful Incorrect, The Federal Government (according to the constitution) cannot take on extra jobs. That is relegated to the state governments to decide. In other words the current government has overstepped its authority by making more departments. The reason the constitution doesn't allow these departments is because they are not elected.
      "By the people and for the people" is the number one founding principle. Laws are allowed not regulations. The idea was if you disagree with a policy you vote out the people in charge. With regulatory departments the people have no option to remove those responsible.

  • @tristanculpepper5627
    @tristanculpepper5627 หลายเดือนก่อน +64

    As a government employee, I would love to see the high ranking people that drag there feet and make my life harder go away.

    • @enolopanr9820
      @enolopanr9820 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      As an American, I hope that less of our tax money goes to the military. Would we even notice if we had 1 less aircraft carrier?

    • @mikesway4522
      @mikesway4522 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@enolopanr9820agreed however it’s Congress that’s the issue and state govt. Govenors want these weapon systems produced in their district…essentially a jobs program

    • @joematties7557
      @joematties7557 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@enolopanr9820 You'll regret that in the days to come. Unfortunately the evil of the world requires a large military. Evil kills the good always.

    • @marasegal1849
      @marasegal1849 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​​@@enolopanr9820The military is a necessity. I think looking at wasteful expenditures within the military is important. For example: taxpayers should not pay for a sex change for anyone serving in the military.
      Also, we need to look at higher standards for those entering into the military. Excellence in IQ testing and fitness should be a hallmark of all armed forces. Quality of military personnel over quantity will be important especially as technology advances.

    • @enolopanr9820
      @enolopanr9820 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@joematties7557 Oh yeah tell me how spending a billion dollars on a single b21 raider is a good idea and an efficient use of money. A BILLION DOLLARS on ONE PLANE.

  • @bazscott
    @bazscott หลายเดือนก่อน +142

    No, government debt is not “similar to us”. It’s COMPLETELY different - we don’t each get to print our own money.

    • @toxx1220
      @toxx1220 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      this. Ppl need to understand that finally. They make it sound like all debt of government is bad, which is it not.

    • @nathanpatera9836
      @nathanpatera9836 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      I agree it's different... But... In the same way printing money to pay off debt will cause inflation, a person incurring a growing mountain of debt, any income becomes less and less effective and valuable. Your income, your wallet, becomes less and less valuable (supposing you never made payments).

    • @toxx1220
      @toxx1220 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@nathanpatera9836 nah, its not comparable. Theres definitely too much debt for a country, but there can actually also be too little. I live in Germany and we have one of the lowest debts in the EU. The problem is, that by saving too much, we are missing investments in our infrastructure and education. And because of this, we are also causing inflation, because our electricity generation e.g. is expensive due to lack of investments. This again worsens the entire landscape for our private companies, since they have to produce at higher cost - which again increases prices.

    • @goatfromhell666
      @goatfromhell666 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Too many people will never understand that, because few take the time, or have the comprehension to learn how money works.

    • @skeratix11
      @skeratix11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@toxx1220you’re not gonna convince me that spending 2 dollars and having 1 dollar is good

  • @smalcolm959
    @smalcolm959 4 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Brandon this was a nice video summary thank you. It’s missing covering one big gaping hole though. I agree with Luke Gromen’s assessment that if they don’t devalue the US$ first before huge spending cuts then we’re likely going to see a huge sell off in everything bar the $ itself. One of the biggest investment risks in 2025 imho

  • @PASCALDAB
    @PASCALDAB หลายเดือนก่อน +2068

    Since the debt crisis could unleash carnage on the stock market leading to economic downturns. We need to be prepared for potential market volatility. how can I secure my $80K stock portfolio against declining?

    • @viviancarolgioao
      @viviancarolgioao หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It's a good idea to seek advice at the moment, unless you're an expert yourself. As someone who runs a service business and sells products on eBay, I can tell you that the economy is struggling and many people are struggling financially.

    • @Tonyrobs2
      @Tonyrobs2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      you are completely right, Advisors have information and paths that are not disclosed to the public.. I profited $560k in 2023 under the tutelage of my Fiduciary-counselor. Am I selling? Absolutely not.. I am going to sit back and observe how this all plays out.

    • @DonaldStokes-p
      @DonaldStokes-p หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      pls how can I reach this expert, I need someone to help me manage my portfolio

    • @Tonyrobs2
      @Tonyrobs2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      My CFA ’’ Sharon Ann Meny, a renowned figure in her line of work. I recommend researching her credentials further. She has many years of experience and is a valuable resource for anyone looking to navigate the financial market..

    • @DonaldStokes-p
      @DonaldStokes-p หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you for the recommendation. I'll send her an email, and I hope I'm able to reach her.

  • @Evelina-v3u
    @Evelina-v3u หลายเดือนก่อน +1049

    Roughly $120K in my portfolio are in tech/TSLA stocks, can I get an advice on any other stocks that I can acquire to diversify my reserve across multiple markets while creating a comprehensive portfolio allocation that balances my concerns of risk aversion and returns that meet yearly inflation.

    • @Garrett-lo6pu
      @Garrett-lo6pu หลายเดือนก่อน

      Understanding personal finances and investing will most likely lead to greater financial independence. By being knowledgeable about money and investing, individuals can make informed decisions about how to save, spend, and invest their money. I know someone who made over $350k in this recession-influenced market, but to the best of my knowledge, it was through an F.A

    • @Lisa-w4u
      @Lisa-w4u หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes, I've been in constant touch with a Financial Analyst for approximately 8 months. You know, these days it's really easy to buy into trending stocks, but the task is determining when to sell or keep. That's where my manager comes in, to help me with entry and exit points in the industries I'm engaged in. Can’t say I regret it, I’m 40% up in profits just in 5months with my initial capital of $160k

    • @Chris-l5t
      @Chris-l5t หลายเดือนก่อน

      How can one find a verifiable financial planner? I would not mind looking up the professional that helped you. I will be retiring in two years and I might need some management on my much larger portfolio. Don't want to take any chances

    • @Lisa-w4u
      @Lisa-w4u หลายเดือนก่อน

      credits to JENIENNE MINITER FAGAN, one of the best portfolio manager's out there. she's well known, you should look her up

    • @G31M1
      @G31M1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tech is always high risk, high reward. Maybe you could try something like McDonald's or something from the health industry like Novo-Nordisk who produce insulin and such. I'm still hoping that Nike will go up again. I don't know too much about the stock market and can't give you any hot tips. You got to make your own research unfortunately. I also heard people say that the oil industry will be interesting after Trump's win. Same goes for the ore industry because nuclear power plants need very specific resources of course and many people still build them (except for my stupid german government).

  • @est8793
    @est8793 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    I have a friend who worked for the federal government in the payroll offices for a branch of federal employees. At the end of every year they had millions of dollars left over so they went out and bought millions of dollars of office furniture they owned warehouses all over the East Coast filled with furniture that they will never use all to not lose the money in their budget

    • @FloppimusMaximus
      @FloppimusMaximus หลายเดือนก่อน

      8 TRILLION under tRump. Not just COVID, 1.7 TRILLION per year.

    • @Tito_1
      @Tito_1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sounds unreasonable to do that..... It only means that some money printing project expands, but then that demand for the products..... Depends on how the economy responds to shopping and support infrastructure..... Something that is easily refundable.

  • @jonahv2905
    @jonahv2905 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Great video. Very solid coverage of pros and cons.

  • @judithelaine9285
    @judithelaine9285 หลายเดือนก่อน +328

    We could save money if we pay the president, the house & senate by their productivity, and how many hours they work. They should be part time and pay for their own retirement & health benefits

    • @lmcatech
      @lmcatech หลายเดือนก่อน +62

      It was never intended to be a full time job. Concerned citizens were supposed to take time out and contribute, then go back to their regular lives.

    • @AnotherPointOfView944
      @AnotherPointOfView944 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      Trump will make the case that he performs serious work on the golf course.

    • @opalcoastal-ld5kd
      @opalcoastal-ld5kd หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AnotherPointOfView944Trump is the only President who donated his salary. He didn’t take a dime to work. Additionally, Trump is a workaholic. He likes to play golf from time to time, he’s allowed a day off. He spent most of his time working.

    • @johnseabiscuit
      @johnseabiscuit หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@AnotherPointOfView944 Trump doesn't take his salary.. pretty well know dumb ass

    • @ian5.011
      @ian5.011 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AnotherPointOfView944trump also doesn’t take home a paycheck. He donates his wage. Bidens spent more time doing nothing than any other president in history.

  • @kensolar69
    @kensolar69 หลายเดือนก่อน +120

    For all those confused. SS is not part of your income tax. It is not part of the general fund.
    It is a separate, private, retirement fund that you pay premiums into as a payroll tax.
    Reducing it, or even eliminating it will not reduce the national debt by 1 penny.

    • @tastyrick
      @tastyrick หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      The problem with SS is that its funds were used to buy Treasury bonds. Its assets are US debt. That is how it was used as a piggy bank to fund overspending. If anything happens to devalue US treasuries, it will implode right along with everything else.

    • @timwildauer5063
      @timwildauer5063 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Right, but if it continues down the path it’s on, it will run out of money well before I retire. Something about it needs to change.

    • @Flapalot
      @Flapalot หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@tastyrick Exactly, we should just remove it. Its badly designed and savings accounts fix this problem.

    • @marktaylor2645
      @marktaylor2645 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Money is fungible, and it comes from current production. When your generation committed genocide on its own people by murdering 60M of their own American babies and chemically preventing twice that, it destroyed the nation who was slated to pay your SS benefits. You can’t get blood from a stone, and you can’t get monthly checks from people who don’t exist.

    • @michaelmullen4288
      @michaelmullen4288 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's not a fund. It's a ponzi scheme. There is no actual account for me, other than an IOU that someone 20 years from now is supposed to pay. Every dollar we put in this year goes immediately to someone withdrawing their SS payment.

  • @Whyaretaxespayingforcorr-cc8sr
    @Whyaretaxespayingforcorr-cc8sr หลายเดือนก่อน +161

    Tesla was one of the Largest receivers of government funds?

    • @skyeiv8471
      @skyeiv8471 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

      I'm sure that he'll get right on that.

    • @gamers-xh3uc
      @gamers-xh3uc หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      Which in theory makes sense America wants to become less dependent on Chinese cars also having Tesla succeed is better for the American people more jobs also a local brand much cheaper

    • @jaredlangley6924
      @jaredlangley6924 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

      He paid it back with interest

    • @freddygalis1497
      @freddygalis1497 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      a loan, already paid with interests.

    • @bateseanderson2667
      @bateseanderson2667 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      ​@gamers-xh3uc no their not. The cheapest tesla is like 39 thousand dollars and the average production workers at tesla make a little over 50 a year in locations that surviving on that is almost impossible. He's not really helping Americans whatsoever. He's helping himself become more rich and power and he's helping his friends become more rich and powerful. That's the problem you have all the worlds wealth in the hands of a few people.

  • @5265vic
    @5265vic 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Stop giving our money away.
    And fire the worthless employees

  • @jstyler2583
    @jstyler2583 หลายเดือนก่อน +86

    Isn't it a conflict of interest to have a businessman with billions of dollars in government contracts in charge of 'trimming' the US budget?

    • @shurnbrendt7581
      @shurnbrendt7581 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      He just might not trim government expenses toward electric cars and space programs. Of which, most Americans are fine with our relative let small space spending.

    • @DP-jd1by
      @DP-jd1by หลายเดือนก่อน

      Most congressmen own the companies that makes arms for the military then create wars! Is that a conflict? Get your head out of your arse. Conflicts are always there!

    • @fondbeebboop9705
      @fondbeebboop9705 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      I do believe that it can be risky but I also believe we need a business man/s to do this because those people live and breathe as cheap as possible and are probably the best you can get to cut spending just have to check them and make sure they don’t get ideas

    • @robertmorin6495
      @robertmorin6495 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      No, I see it as a positive that ANYONE is in charge of trimming the US budget and government waste. I wouldn't object to a first grader doing it.

    • @calvinquallss4905
      @calvinquallss4905 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Would you please explain how this is a conflict of interest? I could see that being probable if he was being appointed to an agency that regulates the business that he owns.

  • @lynnryckman7300
    @lynnryckman7300 หลายเดือนก่อน +114

    Social security is self funding, hands 0ff sticky fingered politicians.

    • @DK-lg7ti
      @DK-lg7ti หลายเดือนก่อน

      if they touch Social security trump era will be over in one month. i know trump wont touch. SS BUT it might increase.

    • @kdb4u
      @kdb4u หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      No it isn't self funding. Social Security has become a general welfare program, many people receive it that never paid a dime. The SS tax that you and your employer pay goes into the general fund, and an iou is issued after they take the money and spend it. Where is this 'fund' where your lifetime SS payments are being held for your use when you retire?

    • @russelljames5631
      @russelljames5631 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kdb4uillegal immigrants pay into social security but they can’t get it and trump wants to kick them all out

    • @DoctorMandible
      @DoctorMandible หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Take from the poor and give to the rich - social security

    • @YoosufMuneer
      @YoosufMuneer หลายเดือนก่อน

      No it's not. It functions like a ponzi

  • @usmarine4636
    @usmarine4636 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Elon Musk will do it! He has the stamina and know how!!!!

  • @DanielleTorres-wb4gs
    @DanielleTorres-wb4gs หลายเดือนก่อน +327

    I hit $113k today. Thank you for all the knowledge and nuggets you had thrown my way over the last months. Started last month 2024. Financial education is indeed required for more than 70% of the society in the country as very few are literate on the subject.

    • @FrankCollins-km1cu
      @FrankCollins-km1cu หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      It's essential for you to have a mentor to keep you accountable. Myself, I'm guided by Evelyn Vera. for years and highly recommend her I focus on him. To be honest, I almost didn't buy the idea of letting someone handle growing my finance, but so glad I did.

    • @JaniceBowman-z7w
      @JaniceBowman-z7w หลายเดือนก่อน

      I would really love to know how much work you did put in to get to this stage.

    • @AmandaElliott-g5p
      @AmandaElliott-g5p หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wow! wow! please is there any way to reach her services?

    • @NancyMills-np1fr
      @NancyMills-np1fr หลายเดือนก่อน

      I keep hearing a lot about Evelyn Vera, she must be really good

    • @EvelynThomas-lx1im
      @EvelynThomas-lx1im หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, I have her WHATSAPPS digits

  • @karasesperanza
    @karasesperanza หลายเดือนก่อน +1059

    Thanks for the insights! Bought XAI68Y, predicting big returns! 📈

  • @michaelwiebeck3
    @michaelwiebeck3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1564

    Since the debt crisis could unleash carnage on the stock market leading to economic downturns. We need to be prepared for potential market volatility. how can I secure my $600K stock portfolio against declining?

    • @Pconradsmith
      @Pconradsmith หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Concentrate on two main objectives. First, keep yourself safe by knowing when to sell stocks in order to limit losses and maximize gains. Second, get ready to benefit from market changes. I advise consulting a coach or other professional for advice.

    • @Rachadrian
      @Rachadrian หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      That makes sense. I’ve been using a financial market expert for two years now and I own a six-figure diversified portfolio from investing in stocks. I want to diversify more this year, though.

    • @Derekhoffman312
      @Derekhoffman312 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Who is this person guiding you and how can i reach he/she?

    • @Rachadrian
      @Rachadrian หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Annette Christine Conte maintains an online presence that can be easily found through a simple search of her name on the internet.

    • @Derekhoffman312
      @Derekhoffman312 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thank you for this tip. It was easy to find your coach. Did my due diligence on her before scheduling a phone call with her. She seems proficient considering her resume.

  • @Jan_offline
    @Jan_offline 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    How many full time jobs you're in ?
    Elon: Yes

  • @danjacobs4557
    @danjacobs4557 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    It is amazing that people who think we cannot afford to pay for doctors, hospitals, and medication somehow think that we can afford to pay for doctors, hospitals, medication and a government bureaucracy to administer it. - Thomas Sowell
    The fatal attraction of government is that it allows busybodies to impose decisions on others without paying any price themselves. That enables them to act as if there were no price, even when there are ruinous prices - paid by others. - Thomas Sowell

    • @tiefensucht
      @tiefensucht หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Sowell misses the point like so often. It is not about having the bureaucracy, it is about implementing rules that regulate it in a meaningful way. Almost every country in the world does that. Only the US have this crazy system with these insane prices. I mean it is a great subvention for european medical companies and I hope this goes on forever, but for US citizen..

    • @juliahello6673
      @juliahello6673 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thomas Sowell needs to delve into the inefficiencies and costs of insurance agencies.

    • @garyes
      @garyes หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@juliahello6673 Yes, profit-based health care is an abomination.

  • @kidm0bius190
    @kidm0bius190 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    the fact that a congressman/woman makes an Avg of $174,000 while a US service member barely makes $30k is part of the problem. they waste so much time yet if we reduced their income i guarantee they would get their asses in gear and deal with the peoples problems more effectively..

    • @atheistleopard2484
      @atheistleopard2484 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      a cut-reduction wouldn't make them move quicker lol it'd make them pissed off and move SLOWER. REMOVING THEM(some how/some way LOL) would make them ...umm....CATCH THE DRIFT. THEN, they'd move faster.

    • @Lwydius
      @Lwydius หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      There is an argument to pay them more. Pay more, attract better candidates, increase competition, and standards will naturally rise. I am not 100% convinced of the argument, but it does have some merit.

    • @SputnikCrisis
      @SputnikCrisis หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Congress should ban Congress owning/trading stocks and doing private business. A huge pay raise should also come with this. They don't care about the $174k salary when they can rake in millions on the side from insider knowledge and money from lobbying. If they were making fuck you money in salary, that would help make them vote on their conscious instead of their dark money interests.

    • @darnoc0010
      @darnoc0010 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SputnikCrisis There's the biggest thing that needs to stop. Lobbying is technically unconstitutional. They should be forced to vote the way those that they represent want. But most politicians don't. Outright lying to get elected used to be punishable by jail time and seizure of all assets. Lets bring that back.

    • @atheistleopard2484
      @atheistleopard2484 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      they would be replaced by somebody who would umm...move faster indeed

  • @adamboey4132
    @adamboey4132 หลายเดือนก่อน +124

    Nearly 66% of the US govt budget every year is non-discretionary, meaning its non-negotiable by congress and used on things like social security, medicare. I’m all for slashing waste, but how does Elon actually plan on reducing spending by 80% when the real problem are the payouts that will get Trump kicked from office guaranteed? I don’t think one senior citizen will vote republican again if their SS or benefits payments get slashed

    • @milisha98
      @milisha98 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

      Having worked in a government department in the past, it's stupidly inefficient. I used to complain that there were "too many chiefs, not enough indians"; me as a single worker had 4 bosses to report to - none of whom agreed with each other. A lot of time was spent getting them into a single room to agree on a path forward. This was a symptom where government departments tended to transfer people who were incompetent rather than firing them. To be honest, a blind person throwing darts could identify and fix inefficiencies even in mandated non-discretionary work.

    • @darrell293
      @darrell293 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Have you ever seen a clown? Must be nice to give away a hundred million dollars😎😎😎🤓🤓😈😈😈👽👽

    • @tHebUm18
      @tHebUm18 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      @@milisha98 And all that inefficiency was, as OP stated, in less than 1/3 of the budget. Most of the budget is Social Security/Medicare which are very low overhead programs where almost the entire budget is paying out benefits.
      Further, over half of that remaining chunk is military spending--which neither party ever wants to touch. So, really, there's only 15% tops of the federal budget even in play for cuts. It's almost like the problem is the US effective tax rates are incredibly low compared to other countries like us because we stopped taxing people like Elon in 1980 and never resumed.

    • @imzjustplayin
      @imzjustplayin หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tHebUm18 social security isn't really an issue unless we're talking about people accepting benefits on behalf of dead people. Medicare is subject to billions of dollars of fraud annually. Medicare is a slush fund of corporate welfare. Medicare is the reason for medical inflation just like student loans cause tuition inflation.

    • @jimmcneal5292
      @jimmcneal5292 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's a problem, and woefully it's unlikely to be solved. But ideally people who can't be soldiers or aren't ultra-rich shouldn't vote in the first place. But even more ideally is to get rid of democracy and just become aristocratic republic or monarchy

  • @RichardSlaughter-t7b
    @RichardSlaughter-t7b 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    As an economist, I like your summary's!

  • @elmoventer9513
    @elmoventer9513 หลายเดือนก่อน +93

    Why does no one talk about the elephant in the room...... Who is the so-called beneficiary of the outstanding debt?????

    • @suomynona4607
      @suomynona4607 หลายเดือนก่อน

      77% of the national debt is held by domestic entities. Some, I assume may even own elephants.

    • @OK-pi6fq
      @OK-pi6fq หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      The countries we borrowed from ( China is a big one).

    • @YoosufMuneer
      @YoosufMuneer หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Mostly Americans lol.

    • @frankstrawnation
      @frankstrawnation หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      That's the one million dollars question. Better saying, the forty eight trillion dollars question.

    • @stephaniemclean3458
      @stephaniemclean3458 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The corporations and banks that were able to monopolised under the capitalistic free market system called neoliberalism. They own and control the governments because they have been bought and paid for through the lobbying system.

  • @michaelpilos
    @michaelpilos หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    1. Checks & Balances
    2. Transparency (as possible)
    3. Efficiency Driven Salaries

  • @henrimoens8636
    @henrimoens8636 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    'Kids', 'safety' & 'racist' are the 3 magic words to block everything or make it 2 x more expensive. Even private companies are playing this game.

  • @jamescoutre6285
    @jamescoutre6285 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Social Security is not revenue it's a liability and should not be touched for government spending. That is one of the big problems with the government.

  • @judelewis6413
    @judelewis6413 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    I think every American should watch this video. You explained his plan very well.

    • @AlternateAlibi
      @AlternateAlibi หลายเดือนก่อน

      Please research Elons destruction and waste of his own government subsidies and contracts he has in fact lied to the gov about. His secret meetings with Putin and others, his belief in a new world order and his massive losses and grifter/con tactics and inflation shares and company values for personal gain. Please my good intelligent US mates… before recommending this liar and cheater who is in fact not even an engineer he has no actual degrees and invented nothing he didn’t not found Tesla or PayPal and actually designed only one component of the charging outlet for recharging teslas. He is tge worst thing you guys could ever do for your country. He is a FRAUD