An excellent and fluently analytical book that fulfills it's objective which is what Mr. Salve calls 'demysitifies the court' on the front page. And as Chintan clearly highlighted, the book sheds light on the reality that courts categorically don't have the final decision in most matters. The author has exquisitely compiled and scrutinized the cases in demonstrating the 'iterative game of action-response-rejoinder' in Chintan's words himself. The Parliament and other public institutions often try to subvert constitutional morality to establish its supremacy and nullify the judicial opinion. So courts as a 'haven of justice' is quite an anachronistic presumption which Chintan has made explicitly evident in his case analysis. The book does a fantastic job to help the general public develop a different narrative of the Indian judiciary in general and the Supreme Court in particular.
They all talk about diversity , tolerance etc bloody shit....first talk about indian judiciary needs honestly, accountability and punishment for corruption then talk about all other things...hypocrites
Quite honestly ,we don't really need diversity what we need is equal opportunity so that any woman ,dalit etc can become judge, minister etc not because of their identity but because of their skill and hardwork.
"Black robes, white lies.............Lying, distortion and other forms of intellectual dishonesty are endemic among judges." Alan M. Dershowitz, Harvard Professor of Law. I agree with your statement, Mr. Shekhar Gupta, saying that it is indeed embarrassing to read some of the Judgments of the SCI. One such Judgment is dated 6.10.2015, titled Vijay Kumar Agarwal, IAS v UOI and another, authored by Mr. Justice A.K.Sikri, who is sitting with you right now. In a nutshell, the Hon'ble CAT, vide Order dated 18.11.2003, quashed and set aside the order dated 13.5.1996 issued by the Government of Maharashtra, on the ground that it was violative of the Rule 5B of All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969. The said Order dated 18.11.2003 attained finality because the respondents failed to challenge it. But CAT illegally refused to grant me consequential benefits flowing out of the said quashment of the said order dated 13.5.1996. I approached the Hon'ble HC of Delhi and the Hon'ble SCI for the said consequential benefits. But to no avail. What is most amazing, nay, shocking, is that even though the said Order of CAT dated 18.11.2003 is holding the filed till date, as the HC and SCI have not set it aside, I have been illegally deprived of the said consequential benefits! Indeed, the said Judgment dated 6.10.2015, titled Vijay Kumar Agarwal, IAS v UOI and another, authored by Mr. Justice A.K.Sikri, reads like a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing! Indeed, much ado about nothing! What a fall from the days of the Fabulous Four: Justice V.K. Krishna Iyer, Justice P.N. Bhagwati, Justice O. Chiannappa Reddy and Justice D.A. Desai. After a smorgasbord of falsehood and deliberate deceptions running into around 12 pages, Mr. A.K.Sikri has shockingly dismissed my SLP "in limine". Unfortunately, Mr. A.K.Sikri is whispered to be a corrupt judge in the corridors of the SCI. Indeed, the threat to the Judiciary and democracy is from within! For details, please contact Vijay Kumar agarwal, Ex-IAS, Mobile: 9560172716, vijay.kumar.agarwal.ias@gmail.com.
he should lead by example by giving up his privileges. he is a brahman man and his father was chief justice too. he should resign as soon as possible and give his position to some lower caste person. plus add reservations in chief justice positions. make it 50% for OBC and lower caste.
Supreme Court is British colonialism structured judiciary not democratic standards and judicial accountability. Judges appointed by collegium system confront with sovereignty of India incited people for confrontational activities against sovereignty of India. President of India MS Droupadi Murmur can revoke authorization granted in favor of Supreme Court in 1950.dealing British colonialism alien rules of laws harmful for people.
Another case that should and will be decussed is the "sitting" on the case by the Supreme Court today in the abrogation of Article 370, and the Central government clamping down a virtual curfew on elected representatives to their homes, and state , that is, its people almost held to ransom at the mercy of ruling dispensation at Delhi and the Supreme Court sitting like a lame duck and watching all rights put in a freezer !!
We need more judges firstly and lots of diversity. Our judges to population ratio is low. And this govt is controlling judicial appointments with an iron fist. Afraid of having its people's cases decided. We also need lots more police personnel. Our cops to population ratio is 5th lowest in the world. Successive govts have tried to keep a strong hold on judiciary and police and not allow them to be truly empowered and toothy, as they obviously fear going to jail themselves.
@@prahladsahaisharma3075 We also need more Dalits, Scheduled caste, scheduled tribes, Tamils, Manipurese, Kashmiris, Odiyas and also more Andaman people in supreme court.
The Babri Masjid demolition case, decided under Ex-CJI Ranjan Gogoi, should be debated and questioned and criticized in the future by scholars, academicians, and critics !!!!!!!!
@@shashanksinha8330 its true i agree to u but sir..eminent legal..persons..who has a clean..public.image..with..outstanding..legal..knowledge..cn be selected...by govt..yes..we have to trust the central govt..but..highly..respectable..jurists....with clean image... .should select judges..and no supreme court judges be allowed..a post retirement. ..appointment...in any..public post...retirement age be increased..till death or incapacity..due to health reasons....
Yeah woman judge should be more but after learning about "Bhart" it's civilization .... Otherwise woman judges wouldn't be like subrimala judgement.....where woman's are itself not happy with it😌
People are running behind money. I don't see any justice in the judical system. Without money no lawyer will fight case for you. Moreover It takes lot of time to get resolved. People are fed up and these people are talking about diversity. God knows india ka kya hoga.
All Supreme Court justices waiting to follow in footsteps of Gogoi. Now finding a honest judge is an exception which once used to be the norm. Can't know who is what.
Current Chief Justice & other judges of supreme court are SPINELESS. You don't deserve respect anymore. Gogoi harassed the woman & went scot-free using his position. Lost hope in judiciary!
An excellent and fluently analytical book that fulfills it's objective which is what Mr. Salve calls 'demysitifies the court' on the front page. And as Chintan clearly highlighted, the book sheds light on the reality that courts categorically don't have the final decision in most matters. The author has exquisitely compiled and scrutinized the cases in demonstrating the 'iterative game of action-response-rejoinder' in Chintan's words himself. The Parliament and other public institutions often try to subvert constitutional morality to establish its supremacy and nullify the judicial opinion. So courts as a 'haven of justice' is quite an anachronistic presumption which Chintan has made explicitly evident in his case analysis. The book does a fantastic job to help the general public develop a different narrative of the Indian judiciary in general and the Supreme Court in particular.
Hope of Indian judiciary
🎉👍👍👍👍👍🎉
More than diversity you need balls to stand against govt or at least defend constitution.
so true...
@@mattmeyers6902 RIGHT NOW HE IS ACTING AS A SAVIOUR OF PEOPLE
We need more young people like Chintan. Logical. Non-opinionated. Using simple language. A must-read book for everyone.
They all talk about diversity , tolerance etc bloody shit....first talk about indian judiciary needs honestly, accountability and punishment for corruption then talk about all other things...hypocrites
You are the last hope of Indian Democracy
All hail Justice Dhananjaya Chandrachud: the next CJI.
Umm...not so next.👀
@@RohitSingh-vo6sq I was mistaken there, yes.
@@SamvedIyer yeah...but he'll be next now.✨
Quite honestly ,we don't really need diversity what we need is equal opportunity so that any woman ,dalit etc can become judge, minister etc not because of their identity but because of their skill and hardwork.
We need more women in prison. Because right now 90% of prisoners are male. We need 50/50 ratio in prison.
😂😂😂
@swarup mitra Also, 90% of ballet dancers are female. We need more male ballet dancers so we can get 50/50 ratio.
@swarup mitra yea. Why not? There should be gender equality in all professions. There should be no gender gap
@swarup mitra strip dancing is the oldest profession. Indians are the ones who invented it. Please read about Karma Sutra.
"Black robes, white lies.............Lying, distortion and other forms of intellectual dishonesty are endemic among judges." Alan M. Dershowitz, Harvard Professor of Law.
I agree with your statement, Mr. Shekhar Gupta, saying that it is indeed embarrassing to read some of the Judgments of the SCI.
One such Judgment is dated 6.10.2015, titled Vijay Kumar Agarwal, IAS v UOI and another, authored by Mr. Justice A.K.Sikri, who is sitting with you right now.
In a nutshell, the Hon'ble CAT, vide Order dated 18.11.2003, quashed and set aside the order dated 13.5.1996 issued by the Government of Maharashtra, on the ground that it was violative of the Rule 5B of All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969.
The said Order dated 18.11.2003 attained finality because the respondents failed to challenge it.
But CAT illegally refused to grant me consequential benefits flowing out of the said quashment of the said order dated 13.5.1996.
I approached the Hon'ble HC of Delhi and the Hon'ble SCI for the said consequential benefits. But to no avail.
What is most amazing, nay, shocking, is that even though the said Order of CAT dated 18.11.2003 is holding the filed till date, as the HC and SCI have not set it aside, I have been illegally deprived of the said consequential benefits!
Indeed, the said Judgment dated 6.10.2015, titled Vijay Kumar Agarwal, IAS v UOI and another, authored by Mr. Justice A.K.Sikri, reads like a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing!
Indeed, much ado about nothing!
What a fall from the days of the Fabulous Four: Justice V.K. Krishna Iyer, Justice P.N. Bhagwati, Justice O. Chiannappa Reddy and Justice D.A. Desai.
After a smorgasbord of falsehood and deliberate deceptions running into around 12 pages, Mr. A.K.Sikri has shockingly dismissed my SLP "in limine".
Unfortunately, Mr. A.K.Sikri is whispered to be a corrupt judge in the corridors of the SCI.
Indeed, the threat to the Judiciary and democracy is from within!
For details, please contact Vijay Kumar agarwal, Ex-IAS, Mobile: 9560172716, vijay.kumar.agarwal.ias@gmail.com.
An Indian judiciary needs less desperate poster boys of feminism.
And more non-brahmins
no masks. we all were idiots just a few weeks ago
he should lead by example by giving up his privileges. he is a brahman man and his father was chief justice too. he should resign as soon as possible and give his position to some lower caste person. plus add reservations in chief justice positions. make it 50% for OBC and lower caste.
First of all INDIAN JUDICIARY NEEDS MORE SPINE IN DELIVERING JUSTICE............THEY ARE GIVING JUDGEMENTS LIKE A FOOL....
Supreme Court is British colonialism structured judiciary not democratic standards and judicial accountability. Judges appointed by collegium system confront with sovereignty of India incited people for confrontational activities against sovereignty of India. President of India MS Droupadi Murmur can revoke authorization granted in favor of Supreme Court in 1950.dealing British colonialism alien rules of laws harmful for people.
Another case that should and will be decussed is the "sitting" on the case by the Supreme Court today in the abrogation of Article 370, and the Central government clamping down a virtual curfew on elected representatives to their homes, and state , that is, its people almost held to ransom at the mercy of ruling dispensation at Delhi and the Supreme Court sitting like a lame duck and watching all rights put in a freezer !!
We need more judges firstly and lots of diversity. Our judges to population ratio is low. And this govt is controlling judicial appointments with an iron fist. Afraid of having its people's cases decided. We also need lots more police personnel. Our cops to population ratio is 5th lowest in the world. Successive govts have tried to keep a strong hold on judiciary and police and not allow them to be truly empowered and toothy, as they obviously fear going to jail themselves.
It was interesting to hear how citizens, the people can make a difference in the judicial process and the formation of laws.
We also need more transgender/gay /LGBT judges. Also, we need more physically disabled judges. That will add more diversity.
Transgender and PWD is okay.
No need of LGBT.
@@prahladsahaisharma3075 We also need more Dalits, Scheduled caste, scheduled tribes, Tamils, Manipurese, Kashmiris, Odiyas and also more Andaman people in supreme court.
We need more qualified neutral judges
@@reardelt i think you are triggered by the word - woman. But let me say you ... This is really a thing which should not be ignored.
@Suman Kundu is there anything bad for having woman judges or what?
The Babri Masjid demolition case, decided under Ex-CJI Ranjan Gogoi, should be debated and questioned and criticized in the future by scholars, academicians, and critics !!!!!!!!
Only women from. Bar n very less representative from within judiciary isnot it Diversity among classes?
Indians are invariably suffering from lung disease.. coughing all the time.. tells though the state of health in India.
It is winter stupid
India needs independent judiciary.
Book launch is taking place today. How come I already have a copy of the book. I had ordered it from Amazon about 7 days back.
Eminent jurists..should select judges..not . judges themselves
So, who chooses those 'eminent jurists' who choose judges? Don't agree with you but sympathise with your emotion
@@shashanksinha8330 its true i agree to u but sir..eminent legal..persons..who has a clean..public.image..with..outstanding..legal..knowledge..cn be selected...by govt..yes..we have to trust the central govt..but..highly..respectable..jurists....with clean image... .should select judges..and no supreme court judges be allowed..a post retirement. ..appointment...in any..public post...retirement age be increased..till death or incapacity..due to health reasons....
Yeah woman judge should be more but after learning about "Bhart" it's civilization .... Otherwise woman judges wouldn't be like subrimala judgement.....where woman's are itself not happy with it😌
People are running behind money. I don't see any justice in the judical system. Without money no lawyer will fight case for you. Moreover It takes lot of time to get resolved. People are fed up and these people are talking about diversity. God knows india ka kya hoga.
Let's not forget bribes that judge take.
Dear Judges, please have guts to punish wrong doers be it BJP or RSS who had put Constitution on stake
Justice Chandrachud is the best 💯💯💯💯
All Supreme Court justices waiting to follow in footsteps of Gogoi. Now finding a honest judge is an exception which once used to be the norm. Can't know who is what.
Please stop identity politics
Indian judiciary needs men's rights issues to be addressed
Current Chief Justice & other judges of supreme court are SPINELESS. You don't deserve respect anymore.
Gogoi harassed the woman & went scot-free using his position.
Lost hope in judiciary!
Women have single handedly destroyed the judiciary with their fake victim card.