Why this Canadian couple walked away from $140K after dispute with home developer

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ต.ค. 2024
  • CTV’s Jeff Pickel hears from a Guelph, Ont. couple who claim they’re are out more than $140,000 after a dispute with a developer.
    #housingcrisis #housingmarket
    Subscribe to CTV News to watch more videos: / ctvnews
    Connect with CTV News:
    For the latest news visit: www.ctvnews.ca/
    For a full video offering visit the CTV News Network: www.ctvnews.ca/...
    CTV News on Facebook: / ctvnews
    CTV News on TikTok: www.tiktok.com...
    CTV News on Twitter: / ctvnews
    CTV News on Instagram: / ctvnews
    CTV News on Reddit: / ctvnews
    ---
    CTV News is Canada's most-watched news organization both locally and nationally, and has a network of national, international, and local news operations.

ความคิดเห็น • 1.4K

  • @Bebedollie
    @Bebedollie 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +811

    They forced them into a situation there was no way out of ,then took their money. There needs to be laws against that .

    • @747-pilot
      @747-pilot 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      This is Cana duh we’re talking about, not the United States! Do you really expect any better? 🙄

    • @VA-gu1jq
      @VA-gu1jq 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ⁠@@747-pilotHey doofus, you know builders screw over hard working Americans also, right? It’s not a “Cana-duh” thing 🤦‍♂️.
      We have the same sleezeballs here.

    • @rebeccahenderson7761
      @rebeccahenderson7761 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      @@747-pilot Don't be so hateful on Canada.

    • @leeworsdell1410
      @leeworsdell1410 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      why not look at the fool running it. guys a moron i work for all kinds of builders and alot are doing this.@@rebeccahenderson7761

    • @charliesargent6225
      @charliesargent6225 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      You actually believe Ameriduh is any better than Canaduh? hahahaha@@747-pilot

  • @Olive_O_Sudden
    @Olive_O_Sudden 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1302

    There should be laws preventing builders from this kind of extortion.

    • @rahuljoshi4534
      @rahuljoshi4534 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

      Those laws are in place, they didn't read or understand the sales agreement

    • @gregjsinclair
      @gregjsinclair 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

      WTF,, Fusion is an Asia owned company ,, these immigrants need to be fined , and deported out of the country ,,, sounds like in this case ,, The Lawyers were in on the scheme ,

    • @daxlarsen2121
      @daxlarsen2121 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

      the builder didn't do anything nasty, that's why the couple said it was not the builders fault. They purchased the house for a certain price, the market dropped out from under them, and the bank likely wouldn't finance the full purchase price because the house isn't worth that much. If they didn't walk away, they would have owed the difference between what the bank was willing to finance, and what the purchase price was. It could have been another 300K that the couple didn't have. Either way, they are lucky the builder was nice enough to just take the down payment and sell the house for current market value and probably not lose their shirts so to speak, which is why they were willing to let them off the hook for potentially hundreds of thousands of dollars that they still owed the builder.
      It's not just new builds, anyone at any time can buy a house and the market can collapse before posession, a lot can happen in real estate in 90 days. The bank at the last minute might say "oh we said we would lend 500,000 to mortgage this house, but now it's only worth 350,000. We will not give you the other 150,000 because a 350,000 house is not enough collateral for a 500,000 loan"

    • @Olive_O_Sudden
      @Olive_O_Sudden 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      @@daxlarsen2121 So, was it the developer or the condo corporation who hiked the maintenance and occupancy fees? If the house was devalued because the bottom dropped out of the market, shouldn't those fees be lessened rather than increased?

    • @bartholomewcubbins9723
      @bartholomewcubbins9723 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      When you invest in real estate, there is always the risk that property values will fall. Especially if you buy when prices are at historical highs.

  • @joetran8798
    @joetran8798 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +842

    Happy that this developer was named and shamed. Once the deposit is made, there should be no changes.

    • @faizasattar1090
      @faizasattar1090 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      This is happening everywhere in Canada as appraisal value of house comes low then the price they bought the house from builder.

    • @scottolson5498
      @scottolson5498 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      I think they should have lawyered up. If the contract is misleading you can still sue. Sounds like a cash flow issue

    • @lililinda6947
      @lililinda6947 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@scottolson5498but they had a lawyer it sounded like from the video

    • @fkb247
      @fkb247 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      ​@lililinda6947
      If this is so. Hopefully, the lawyer has professional liability insurance.
      Always check your lawyer out by asking for a certain document.

    •  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If your stupid enough to buy property in a country with weak laws no rights and justice then you kinda deserve it. Its set up this way for a reason, so you lose.

  • @mjkrez
    @mjkrez 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +469

    Never, EVER use the builder's lawyer to save on legal fees. Builders offer this option on purpose. Its tempting to save $2K, but if something goes sideways, that lawyer will not represent you. ALWAYS use your OWN lawyer if you are building.

    • @tonysopranosduck416
      @tonysopranosduck416 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      Stellar advice!!

    • @Chicago48
      @Chicago48 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      $140K is insane. They could have taken that down payment and BUILT their own TINY HOME.

    • @polokucoch8112
      @polokucoch8112 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      although better, essentially your lawyer can do nothing. The contracts are designed to favor the builder. It's a sad situation indeed.

    • @timneufeld2700
      @timneufeld2700 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Even better. If you find a property for sale by the home owners, you can hire a barrister and save even more money. Realtors fees add up to tens of thousands of dollars depending on the price of the house. A barrister will cost only a fraction of that.

    • @jimhiebert650
      @jimhiebert650 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ur own lawyercan,t be trusted either i have found , they are slopy don,t really stand up for your interests

  • @TBonerton
    @TBonerton 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +692

    Greed is destroying our society.

    • @kirkyorg7654
      @kirkyorg7654 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      got that right

    • @bonbonvegabon
      @bonbonvegabon 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Welcome to Ford the cons Ontario. Life is always more miserable and expensive under conservative govts@bbbj6583

    • @g.e.b.8159
      @g.e.b.8159 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Just look at downtown Toronto. Nothing remotely related to careful planning, but pure greed.

    • @ROOKTABULA
      @ROOKTABULA 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @bbbj6583 Cry harder Northern MAGAt.

    • @harrisonsir1
      @harrisonsir1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ever heard of buyers beware?

  • @AZ-fz5xc
    @AZ-fz5xc 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +495

    Occupancy fees should be illegal. Or at least capped at a certain amount at the time of signing the contract agreement

    • @JayeAye-t7o
      @JayeAye-t7o 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      Occupancy fees pay for local property taxes and electric/hydro bills. 5k does sound outlandish, but, it doesn't go to nothing. Essentially, once they would've moved in, the city wouldn't send them bills from previous months because the builder would have to pay them. Something must've gone wrong with city hall if they were asking for well over 5k/month.

    • @almontoya5703
      @almontoya5703 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JayeAye-t7o 40k/6 month for property taxes/bills doesn't sound right. What else is in the occupancy fees?

    • @andrelin0913
      @andrelin0913 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JayeAye-t7ooccupancy fee not only consist of city’s charge and maintenance fees, it primarily made of mortgage interest of unpaid home value. Since the mortgage rate has skyrocketed, the interest amount for the unpaid money also jump. Nonetheless, the initially assessment of city’s property tax is outrageous. I have heard someone’s two bed room condo be assessed valued more than millions and got charged accordingly, you can always get reimbursed from the builder after you got your proper tax slips for the difference though.

    • @bw6078
      @bw6078 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How can they have Hydro bills before they even move in. Sounds like more purchase and or builder regulation is needed.@@JayeAye-t7o

    • @maggiemomo9259
      @maggiemomo9259 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think it has to do with the increase of interest rate between 2022 and now @@JayeAye-t7o

  • @jassy583
    @jassy583 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +361

    Feel bad for the buyers. So much of corruption in real estate/mortgage industry in canada

    • @Douglas_Blake_579
      @Douglas_Blake_579 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Yep... even the lawyers are playing for the wrong side these days.

    • @gregjsinclair
      @gregjsinclair 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      WTF,, Fusion is an Asia owned company ,, these immigrants need to be fined , and deported out of the country ,,, sounds like in this case ,, The Lawyers were in on the scheme ,

    • @randomrazr
      @randomrazr 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      them realtors willl say housing ONLY GOES UPPP UPP AND UPPPPPP

    • @Douglas_Blake_579
      @Douglas_Blake_579 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@gregjsinclair
      If it is Asian owned, it's likely the owners are not in Canada at all. The local action will be handled by a "management company".

    • @BlackfaceTrudoh
      @BlackfaceTrudoh 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      lol! You meant to say Canada is a corrupt shithole

  • @REALMAGGIETRUDEAU
    @REALMAGGIETRUDEAU 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +182

    Never put money down on a house that isn't built

    • @John_II
      @John_II 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Wise advice.

    • @djayjp
      @djayjp 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      In a to-be condo corp anyway.

    • @freddexta3363
      @freddexta3363 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@djayjpUnless you are the one building your own anyway. Quite the warning to anyone thinking of going this route.

    • @aidenschvatkok5732
      @aidenschvatkok5732 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Way things are going I may never own a home. That being said, the way suddenly about 20 years ago homes under construction suddenly had chip board walls kinda makes me not want one.

    • @freddexta3363
      @freddexta3363 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@aidenschvatkok5732 So buy one that was build before that time, I would agree that the quality of building materials has gotten worse during the last 20 years, especially wood.

  • @Jenuin
    @Jenuin 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +214

    Canadians need laws to prevent builders from robbing would be home owners.

    • @Mr.chickensoup
      @Mr.chickensoup 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Canada has tons of laws they need to start respecting and enforcing them

    • @bonbonvegabon
      @bonbonvegabon 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Welcome to Ford the cons Ontario. Life is always more miserable and expensive under conservative govts

    • @Jenuin
      @Jenuin 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Mr.chickensoup wouldn’t the lawyers know these laws?

    • @nibsniven3497
      @nibsniven3497 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@JenuinI’ve had horrible luck with lawyers. It seems like they want to charge the most money for the least work, but there’s no end to it. You pay them $4000 retainer, but it’s all gone in no time in fees. $120 for a letter that took 5 minutes to write. $600 for a half hour phone call.
      Anyway, my guess is their lawyer failed to explain their exposure to fee increases prior to signing.

    • @dabbbles
      @dabbbles 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      SEE ABOVE. (alter the calibre to suit your requirements.)

  • @RCWeldingsgarage
    @RCWeldingsgarage 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +125

    The builder cornered them into losing their deposit. Not right at all. They should fight it in court but unfortunately there's no law stopping condo builders from doing this.

    • @Chicago48
      @Chicago48 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      For $140K they could have built their own home.

    • @ladyluck5248
      @ladyluck5248 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Chicago48 assuming they had the land to build on : then there’s the well, septic , lot levies building permits etc.

    • @NotAffiliated
      @NotAffiliated 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ladyluck5248 A better point probably would be for $140K they could have built a tiny home or put a big down payment on a real home. Yea, *I WISH* I could build a real home for $140K but in theory you could if everything in the world was just perfect for it.

    • @valerielove9837
      @valerielove9837 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​​@@Chicago48how true. And also have a bigger house and a smaller mortgage

    • @SPINNINGMYWHEELS777
      @SPINNINGMYWHEELS777 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      no they didn't , why do you think the builder can sue these two morons. They didn't read the fine print. Giddy up consumers I call them.. typical debt slaves. Notice how they didn't mention they didn't even make that 140 grand.. it was a bank loan. So now it just piles on their already mortgaged lives. You know that guy drives an $80,000 truck he doesn't own.

  • @barrybebenek8691
    @barrybebenek8691 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +75

    There’s corporate-corruption like this that is allowed and yet I the next breath the government throws out the term of “housing crisis”. Gee, wonder why there’s a problem of owning a property for any “normal working” person! 🇨🇦

  • @cavelleardiel
    @cavelleardiel 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +125

    Nope. They should get their money back less 3% for admin fees. This is disgusting and should not be allowed.

    • @MrWookie1981
      @MrWookie1981 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      So the builder should take the loss? Why?

    • @Alekkd
      @Alekkd 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      @@MrWookie1981 Exactly. Builders didn't devalue the property, the market did. The builders lowered the price to sell the remaining units. They signed a contract for a certain price and the value usually goes up but they were caught and the value went down. It's not on the builder to "price match" on contracts if the value goes down.

    • @cavelleardiel
      @cavelleardiel 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@MrWookie1981 The builders can write off losses and absorb them. Builders are usually corporations so that is rarely, if ever affects their personal financial status. There has to be more equitable laws for both sides. The builder will still sell the home and most likely will still make a profit.

    • @freddexta3363
      @freddexta3363 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@cavelleardiel And you know this...how? My sons' father-in-law is a self employed house builder and if you really believe that every house is always sold at a profit anywhere and at any time no matter what the market is at the time of sale then you don't understand how the free market works in practice. Fact is that the builder who puts up the money to build the house runs a huge risk that the market will turn against him and that loss needs to be paid for out of the profit made by selling an x amount of other houses. "The builder can write off losses and absorb them", clearly you have never been involved in house construction.

    • @cavelleardiel
      @cavelleardiel 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@freddexta3363 A builder should not be able to walk away with a 150,000.00 deposit. A percentage that is reasonable is acceptable.

  • @bradene-a4182
    @bradene-a4182 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +336

    This is so sad . Contributing members of society do not deserve this.

    • @johnwattdotca
      @johnwattdotca 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Any chance you can define "contributing members of society"?

    • @El-Dorado930
      @El-Dorado930 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      If you make more than 100k/year, you're a contributing member, duh.

    • @johnwattdotca
      @johnwattdotca 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@El-Dorado930 I see you put a financial price on being a contributing member of society. You are so wrong.

    • @El-Dorado930
      @El-Dorado930 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@johnwattdotca I was being sarcastic...

    • @allanthomas6097
      @allanthomas6097 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@johnwattdotcaof you pay more tax yiu are definitely contributing more.

  • @angelal1923
    @angelal1923 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +203

    We had a similar experience last year. We almost lost our house and just finalized the negotiations for the lien that trades put on it. We paid 80-100K more than we were supposed to and the house was never completed by the builder. Can't sue because of the "corporate veil". Hubs and I aren't much for government interference, but something like this devastates families financially and there's no recourse. Something's wrong with the system.

    • @evasco1979
      @evasco1979 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      Governments should protect buyers via legislation.

    • @faemow5380
      @faemow5380 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I'm sorry this happened to you and I always feel bad for the trades, but this was their only recourse to recoup their time/material losses

    • @djayjp
      @djayjp 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Oh so you finally understand the problems with free market anarchism?

    • @royjohnson465
      @royjohnson465 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Do “not” buy a newly built house in the city was their mistake, but rather instead the answer is to purchase an existing older house that has already been built long ago.

    • @davidrynberk1533
      @davidrynberk1533 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Sorry you had to go through such an ordeal, there should be a clear recourse..no one should have to go to extremes of losing so much.The system isn't working.

  • @Fuhnance
    @Fuhnance 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +190

    What is their lawyer doing? That's super shady of the builder in any case though.

    • @bartholomewcubbins9723
      @bartholomewcubbins9723 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The lawyer's job is just to explain the contract. The client is still responsible for deciding whether or not to sign it, and accepting the risks of real estate investment if they do.

    • @mcrick8931
      @mcrick8931 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bartholomewcubbins9723 Lawyers job is getting your money

    • @player276
      @player276 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bartholomewcubbins9723 Lawyers job is to advise. When I bought my house, the lawyer explicitly said "You need to amend the contract and put caps on these couple of fees. They won't necessarily agree, but it could harm you in rare cases"

  • @corriszucs4066
    @corriszucs4066 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +64

    This makes me sick to my stomach!! I am so sorry for what they have been through and lost :(

    • @LK-pb4no
      @LK-pb4no 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I agree. $140K is no pocket change. I"m impressed however, at how calm they are considering everything. I really feel for them losing all that money.

  • @cayrick
    @cayrick 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +160

    Wow! nice couple. So sad to see it ended this way and respect them for their attitude over this very nasty situation.

    • @randoir1863
      @randoir1863 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Yes , it's refreshing to see anybody remain this calm after being fleeced for 140k . They accepted the consequences and walked away . No yelling , no screaming about how unfair life is or how corrupt the system is . They just wanted to make light of what happened to them so that everyone else is aware of this builder's tactics .

    • @TheChangNetwork
      @TheChangNetwork 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      what tactics?@@randoir1863

    • @Longball1028
      @Longball1028 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      So true! I can’t imagine getting scammed for 140k and be that calm and logical about it.

    • @masterloot
      @masterloot 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I am not sure if you're being sarcastic. and why remaining calm matters at all. @@randoir1863

  • @davidmcnamara8024
    @davidmcnamara8024 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +72

    This report formed more questions than answers. If the home was devalued by 200,000 would that 140,000 down payment be a greater % ? The public is not informed at all by this reporter. This story doesn't pass the smell test.

    • @jumbome7420
      @jumbome7420 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It does if you paid attention or if you went and read the story

    • @davidmcnamara8024
      @davidmcnamara8024 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@jumbome7420 where did the reporter explain how a 200k drop in value doesn't mean the down payment is worth more on a %? Excuse me that IS his job. It's so bad I wouldn't waste my time reading anything that writes.

    • @DisturbedRocks
      @DisturbedRocks 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      Home was devalued as in it was bought for $1M, then by the time it was ready to be closed, its value was $800k (because housing market is down right now).
      So they are to buy something worth 800k for 1M. So the bank will approve loan for 800k-140k, and they will need to make another 200k payment to get to 1M they promised the builder.
      Basically a case of crappy luck that they bought at the peak.

    • @davidmcnamara8024
      @davidmcnamara8024 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MarkFreemanYVR whatever that's supposed to mean?

    • @armandbejar5289
      @armandbejar5289 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@davidmcnamara8024@DisturbedRocks explained it well. Do you understand it now?

  • @EndlessFunctionality
    @EndlessFunctionality 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +83

    The lesson is: Do no buy pre-construction.

    • @1942__Flowz
      @1942__Flowz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Facts!

    • @Daniel-z7z1q
      @Daniel-z7z1q 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yup. All you’re doing is buying a promise from someone you don’t know someone who doesn’t care about you.

    • @dabbbles
      @dabbbles 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Further: Do not buy before 'inspection' by an independent expert and city/state/ 'registration' including a a clear-cut, waffle-free WARRANTY for(say) FORTY YEARS. (ANY other business offers a comprehensive warranty: even solar-panel producers offer 30 years). Bottom line: MAKE IT PERSONAL!

    • @spittinvenom9843
      @spittinvenom9843 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We did. It’s ok if done right

    • @Dan5482
      @Dan5482 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The lesson is: leave Canada. It sucks.

  • @mustafaali4907
    @mustafaali4907 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    You are not alone we are going through the same situation and there should be laws to protect homebuyers as well.

  • @dougmaverick3287
    @dougmaverick3287 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    Those fees mentioned in this video are completely obscene.
    Moral of the story, don't buy new construction.
    Buy resale instead.
    Then there's no chance for a crooked, immoral builder to add any kind of fees.
    My friend and I went out to the Mount Hope area in Hamilton to pick up a chair advertised on Kijiji, and the seller had just moved into a new townhouse in the area, and I asked her how much they're going for and I almost choked when she said $800,000.
    Insanity.

    • @Makeitwithmanny
      @Makeitwithmanny 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This is a crappy builder nothing to do with new construction.

  • @jdog2345
    @jdog2345 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    This is absolutely sneaky behaviour.
    Feel terrible for this couple who lost a great down payment for another home.

  • @Azel247
    @Azel247 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    I wanted to buy a pre-sale home so I could customize it, but stories like these are exactly why I gave up on that and bought one that's already built instead.

  • @royjohnson465
    @royjohnson465 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    ~Do “not” buy a newly built house in the city was their mistake, but rather instead the answer is to purchase an existing older house that has already been built long ago.

  • @Fuzzle1985
    @Fuzzle1985 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    Give you discounts initially but recoupe those costs with the fees later. Legal bait and switch. They should sue.

    • @locutus99
      @locutus99 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      yes sue because the company wanted them to live up to the terms of the contract they signed. sue for what?

  • @peterbodnarchuk1
    @peterbodnarchuk1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    This is so incredibly wrong.
    So NEVER MAKE a deal witth Fusion Homes! Thanks for the info.

  • @NotLeftarded1
    @NotLeftarded1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +112

    I'm telling my kids to save their money and get the heck out of Canada.

    • @brucemaddox
      @brucemaddox 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Give it another year or two things are going to change in this country, have them move to Alberta, I'm serious.
      alberta is going to be a major economic power house.

    • @NotLeftarded1
      @NotLeftarded1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@brucemaddox 🤣🤣🤣 little pee pee is too soft he's not going to fix a thing.

    • @NotLeftarded1
      @NotLeftarded1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@brucemaddox A country full of cowards scared to be called racist and supremacists will never be able to right itself.

    • @evalangley3985
      @evalangley3985 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@brucemaddox ROFL... oil is done.

    • @jesusisgod4992
      @jesusisgod4992 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@evalangley3985 You're off oil and gas?
      Only 6% of Albertans work in oil and gas.
      End Times Prophecy has them fighting over oil.

  • @HeronPoint2021
    @HeronPoint2021 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +76

    Buyer Beware though even using a lawyer the checklist of what's WRONG with this contract (even the lawyer might miss) is that builders are in a very demanding, competitive environment. And the survivors make sure that contract benefits THEM and gives THEM control and/or an out.

    • @catritz
      @catritz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      " *builders are in a very demanding, competitive environment* " ??? *No they are Not* ! Not only has the Canadian government increased mortgages, apparently, they have also decided to stall and/or stop the construction/building of houses. Therefore destroying any hope for hard working Canadians to own a *HOME* .

    • @pabloandrew38
      @pabloandrew38 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Lawyers are useless when it comes to this kind of thing. I dont think they even read the contracts.

    • @viewsfromthebalconyet-al1166
      @viewsfromthebalconyet-al1166 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Be your own lawyer. Is hard work but can be done. I’m currently suing the developer of my pre con

    • @seeya205
      @seeya205 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Never buy a house that you can't step foot in!

    • @dabbbles
      @dabbbles 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ALWAYS!!:- 'It's YOUR money Ralph; YOU make the rules.' And NEVER pay for ANYTHING except COD. Failing that, send me your address:- I have an unbelievable deal for you!😏

  • @ndiouma
    @ndiouma 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    if your house is 200k under valued. you will have to bring 200k during closing if you don't have it you won't close and the builder will sue you for the difference if it is sold to another person. They probably don't have 200k that's why they walked away. That is why they said they were relieved when the builder accepted to take the downpayment and not sue because it would have cost them more money and we are not even talking about the new high interest rate. All the other details they mentioned (condo fees etc) are pointless. The under value property is the main reason. A builder cannot sell property 200k over market value, no-one will buy them. It is just an unfortunate situation

    • @Omar-in7wl
      @Omar-in7wl 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah they are dishonest and disingenuous

    • @MM-hw6fz
      @MM-hw6fz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      They don't qualify for the house anymore with high interest rates.

    • @bartholomewcubbins9723
      @bartholomewcubbins9723 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Yes, nobody would walk away from $140,000 just because of a few months of occupancy fees.

    • @MrWookie1981
      @MrWookie1981 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      At least someone gets it. And the only reason the occupancy rates went up is due interest rates increasing. It is not excess profit to the builder.

    • @MM-hw6fz
      @MM-hw6fz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MrWookie1981 Seeking to understand how's occupancy rate related to interest rate ? I thought both are separate , occupancy goes to the management and interest rate is what the bank offers.

  • @marksarty3502
    @marksarty3502 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +86

    Should this fall back on their lawyer…why is there a need for lawyers if these things can happen anyway?

    • @HeronPoint2021
      @HeronPoint2021 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Did I miss??? They received an email from FUSIAN"S lawyer, and I didn't catch they even HAD a lawyer look at the contract and advise them.

    • @scottolson5498
      @scottolson5498 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Then sue the lawyer. I mean if they are made aware then they are just stupid. They seem pretty with it.

    • @annalee5751
      @annalee5751 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Apparently AI can write up a significant contract. This is where crypto "Smart Contracts" would be a life saver. @@HeronPoint2021

    • @lililinda6947
      @lililinda6947 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@HeronPoint2021they said “the lawyer” so yeah it’s unclear but sounds like it’s not illegal anyhow

    • @andrewemery7459
      @andrewemery7459 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      100 percent correct

  • @Mascotal
    @Mascotal 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

    The builders are masters at getting around the bumps in their world.

    • @TheChangNetwork
      @TheChangNetwork 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not really, they are probably taking losses as well. Why else are they selling houses for 200k less than before?

    • @dabbbles
      @dabbbles 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheChangNetwork Another simpleton!! They're selling houses for $200k less than before because they were OVERPRICED by $800k 'before'. I'm in Australia, and can build a decent 'Familiy Home for under $20k. (sic)

  • @TashabyNature
    @TashabyNature 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    My family went through something similar, still going through after losing so much 🙏🏾

  • @bekind5738
    @bekind5738 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    SHAME on FUSION the developer, this is pure greed and extortion.

  • @4799balaji
    @4799balaji 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +112

    I don't understand! Why did they walk away from $140,000 to escape $40,000 over the next 6 months? Not only that! They were ready to pay $309+$3250 which would come to $21,354 in the next 6 months. So basically they saved $18,646 by loosing $140,000. That doesn't make sense at all. Or there's something else that this news didn't cover.

    • @hoanghuynh517
      @hoanghuynh517 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      They most likely ran out of money. Probably don't have financing from bank at these rates anymore either.

    • @RandomPerson-dl8qs
      @RandomPerson-dl8qs 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

      It's a difference between money now, and money you already spent. While they did already put down $140K in the past, they may not be in the position to pay the ~$6,000/month as things currently stand, especially with no clarity on when those payments will end.

    • @sriramcan
      @sriramcan 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      agreed. even I am confused as to why they walked away and they are saying the builder is also not to be blamed for this

    • @nb1638
      @nb1638 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      They said there is no end date for occupancy fee, that means they will pay that for ever????

    • @luisfernando5998
      @luisfernando5998 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nb1638yes I have a house you can pay me forever for …

  • @dkwsu16
    @dkwsu16 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    Prebuilds can be safe and okay. Just don’t go with small builders and do a lot of research on the builders before signing.

    • @kimmykero2421
      @kimmykero2421 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Oh no...Fusion is a fairly big builder in Southern Ontario...Guelph, Kitchener, Cambridge... I'm so glad this is out there....

    • @shrimpy7862
      @shrimpy7862 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      I'd trust a small group of builders before a large company. There are far more crooks in suits.

    • @John_II
      @John_II 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wise advice. Track record matters because pre-builds come with a lot of risk (which is why you buy at a "discount").

    • @Phantus00
      @Phantus00 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@shrimpy7862 Exactly, it's the predatory mega corps you have to look out for.

  • @charlenemillar7059
    @charlenemillar7059 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +74

    The couple should make a claim against their lawyers’ errors & omissions insurance.

    • @djayjp
      @djayjp 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Have to sue them which is an expensive proposition after losing all that money.

    • @TheTruth-cg8vj
      @TheTruth-cg8vj 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Why does everyone think the developer is to blame. They said they were lucky - because the developer didn't sue them for his losses due to them backing out of the sale. They gambled on the market and lost.

    • @jannalam6861
      @jannalam6861 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@TheTruth-cg8vjwhat losses though?

    • @ktktktktktktkt
      @ktktktktktktkt 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@TheTruth-cg8vj Just because it's not illegal doesn't mean it's not unethical. They wanted to back out of the sale because they found the updated terms to be unreasonable and they didn't know how long they would have to pay occupancy fees for. They consider themselves lucky because the developer accepted the agreement meaning they no longer have to deal with this mess. This has nothing to do with gambling on the market. This is the developer behaving badly.

    • @bartholomewcubbins9723
      @bartholomewcubbins9723 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@ktktktktktktkt There were no updated terms. They're just no longer happy with the original terms they agreed to a year ago. And of course, no one would be happy if they bought near the peak of the market and then the home's value dropped by over $200k. But they were lucky they could cut that $200k+ loss down to $140k.

  • @wolfmangoland7972
    @wolfmangoland7972 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Canadian laws seem very backward when compared to the New York State laws. Builders and developers cannot cheat potential homeowners the way they are doing in Canada.

  • @HTMLpopper
    @HTMLpopper 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    How is any of this even legal ?

    • @MrWookie1981
      @MrWookie1981 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Why is not legal? They are lucky they are not getting sued by the builder for losses.

    • @seeya205
      @seeya205 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It's in their legally binding contract!

    • @Robsav-yx6vi
      @Robsav-yx6vi 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s exactly what I thought. Why wouldn’t they sell it back
      To the developers after it was completed.

    • @TheChangNetwork
      @TheChangNetwork 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Robsav-yx6vi Why would the developer want to buy it back when they are already selling their other houses for 200k less than before?

  • @ladyluck5248
    @ladyluck5248 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    I found myself for 10 months in the same situation. I paid occupancy fees for 10 months. Literally the day I took possession I slapped a for sale sign on the place, sold and moved 60 days later.

    • @johndor7793
      @johndor7793 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Cant all of these hardships be avoided with a little research beforehand? Its just an assumption. I have no idea.

    • @PWingert1966
      @PWingert1966 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@johndor7793 The problem is if the construction is delayed the occupancy costs often are used to cover the loan the builder took out to cover the construction costs while he gets the time, materials and resources to finish the construction. Under normal circumstances, you would have taken possession and then your mortgage would have paid the builder for the house. but if the house is delayed the builder still has to pay his loan and without the mortgage money, there is no cash to pay it. Some larger developers cross-finance projects spending money from one project to pay the loan on another. That can often collapse and leave both projects in trouble.

    • @johndor7793
      @johndor7793 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ya. Looking back on how I phrased the question feels kind of dumb on my part.

  • @Goldsavergamer
    @Goldsavergamer 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    They are developers - of course they are money hungry. Never buy pre sale, you don’t know what you are paying for.

    • @John_II
      @John_II 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Word.

  • @Allen-L-Canada
    @Allen-L-Canada 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i didn't get it, they forfeit $140K to avoid 40K occupancy fee? How was the house devalued by $200K.

  • @momsterzz
    @momsterzz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +68

    This is crazy. I can’t believe they’re just walking away.

    • @bartholomewcubbins9723
      @bartholomewcubbins9723 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Walking away, they lose $140k. If they complete the deal, they'd have a$200k loss due to the falling real estate prices. So, painful as it may be, walking away is a logical choice.

    • @allanthomas6097
      @allanthomas6097 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      ​@bartholomewcubbins9723 I'm confused though. Are they planing on selling the house right away. Can't they live there fir 10 years and sell when the houses value goes back up

    • @bartholomewcubbins9723
      @bartholomewcubbins9723 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@allanthomas6097 If they have the cash to complete the deal, they could do that. But suppose their purchase price was $1,000,000, so they still owe the developer $860k. If the home's value has dropped to $800k, they could instead buy another similar house for $800k and save $60k. And if they're willing to wait another year, those same houses might be selling for under $700k.
      The more likely scenario is that they need a mortgage to pay off the remaining $860k. But if the house is worth only $800, they might not be able to get a mortgage for more than $720k. That leaves them $140k short. If they don't have that much saved up and can't get a loan from family or friends, they can't even complete the purchase.

    • @Alekkd
      @Alekkd 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@allanthomas6097 You cannot get a mortgage if you're under water on the property value. You think the bank will give them $1million mortgage for a place valued at 1million as they already paid the 140k down payment that went 'poof' in the downturn?
      As well they calculated that the 'hosting' cost would be $5-6k a month until Strata was formed which wasn't going to happen anytime soon.

    • @MrTrail246
      @MrTrail246 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I won't walk away

  • @miguelsaucedo8789
    @miguelsaucedo8789 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    140k should be buying you an entire house. Those prices are hyperinflated.

  • @timneufeld2700
    @timneufeld2700 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    By the way, I payed approximately one third that for an old homestead in a rural setting. $65,000 in house renovations and 25 years later I’ve finished raising a family with very little debt. You have to look out for your self in this world. The laws can be used to take advantage of others as well as protecting your self.

    • @warehousehhm3694
      @warehousehhm3694 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      awesome, had a friend do the same.

  • @jptrainor
    @jptrainor 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Clear as mud.

  • @janbastein7355
    @janbastein7355 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Obviously these criminals get away with fraud etc.!!!! That’s ridiculous!!!

  • @beamazing2876
    @beamazing2876 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    That's crazy. If this were to happen here, they would burn the housing development, so the contractor would lose too.

  • @alhumphreys5784
    @alhumphreys5784 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    So sad these crooks are promoted by blaming the home owner

    • @TheTruth-cg8vj
      @TheTruth-cg8vj 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Why does everyone think the developer is to blame. They said they were lucky - because the developer didn't sue them for his losses due to them backing out of the sale. They gambled on the market and lost. They put 10% down and the property falls 25% because their timing was wrong, they can't complete the sale now. Oh, I forgot everybody makes money in RE, it's a sure thing. Extrapolate that to 5 years into the future, if you dare.

  • @eastafricanqueen9866
    @eastafricanqueen9866 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sacrificing 150 k is crazy to me , why is Canada so backwards

  • @allanguindon2156
    @allanguindon2156 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    What the hell is an occupancy fee?

    • @PWingert1966
      @PWingert1966 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Typically you see these when a build is delayed for some reason beyond it original occupancy date and represents the amount the builder is paying to the bank on the load they took to build the house. At least that is what it is supposed to be for. Its called an occupancy fee because you were expected to have occupied the house during that time but are unable to due to a delay in the construction. The money doesn't go straight into the developer's pocket, it actually is going to pay the load the developer took to pay for that house that he is unable to pay since he didn't receive the mortgage money because of the delay and you not being able to occupy the house.

  • @joeredman9354
    @joeredman9354 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    If Canadian politicians weren't so busy passing laws to strip citizens of their rights, they have the time to outlaw these kinds of predatory business practices...

    • @Trund27
      @Trund27 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What rights? Please don’t tell me you’re talking about masks or vaccines. This is squarely on predatory developers and no protection for buyers.

  • @kashif9145
    @kashif9145 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    What’s an occupancy fee! WTF

    • @mimiashford5544
      @mimiashford5544 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      IKR?? In your OWN home? Scams & thieves everywhere.

  • @cvanunen
    @cvanunen 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So, how is this legal? What part did I miss here?

  • @daphneraven6745
    @daphneraven6745 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    it’s not just in Ontario. I know a couple in Alberta that bought a piece of land and then hired the contractors, but in the end they just gave up on it because the builders are ripping them off every time they turned around. They actually had to give up on the project and go start off all over again, just to get rid of the Corporate thieves and being systematically stolen from at every turn.
    But that couple was really lucky that they could do that. Not everybody can do that. if they had been less wealthy, they would have been bankrupted, which I think is probably what these builders do.
    There should definitely be some way of knowing which ones are unscrupulous.

    • @John_II
      @John_II 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Or you could just not buy prebuilds and avoid the whole situation.

  • @endeeyoung
    @endeeyoung 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This makes no sense. There should be laws protecting home buyers from things like this. How do you forfeit 140k of hard earned money. So Sad.

  • @dajusta87
    @dajusta87 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    They don’t mind losing $140K ? They must be billionaires.

    • @MM-hw6fz
      @MM-hw6fz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Exactly my thought, just coz they have to pay few extra dollars in maintenance fee it's not worth losing 140k. Every new builder has occupancy fee, this is basically the fee you pay for occupying yet not owing the title yet coz paperwork and registration with the city takes time. It's foolish of them to move out of this deal, I think they don't qualify anymore coz of high interest rate and they were finding excuses to dump the deal 😅

    • @moelo5930
      @moelo5930 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And not getting sued too.

    • @Mr.chickensoup
      @Mr.chickensoup 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      RIGHT?!!!!!

    • @jamesandich6960
      @jamesandich6960 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wrong, I know them. Lost their life saving. Dummy

    • @nessparadis6948
      @nessparadis6948 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MM-hw6fz, did you forget the occupancy fees?

  • @TOC359
    @TOC359 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I WOULD SUE FUSION.....BREACH OF TRUST....!!

  • @mveevers1350
    @mveevers1350 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    These developers don’t care about the homeowner- they wait to pry onto the next buyer. They know once you’ve signed they have you.

  • @aoerayner
    @aoerayner 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    As someone in the renovation industry I would never buy new. The quality and craftsmanship are horrible. Also occupancy fees are in place because your bank won't give u your mortgage on occupancy only when the building is finalized but the money is due to the builder on occupancy so they charge u.

  • @planetarycruise
    @planetarycruise 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    So basically you sign a blank cheque when you buy pre-sale? Seems ridiculous

  • @nicoletambasco9210
    @nicoletambasco9210 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Lawyer should have seen it coming. How can the create and increase fees? It’s not in the contract?

  • @UnchainedMelody86
    @UnchainedMelody86 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    no point of backing out the deal. they're building townhomes not a condo apartment. its not like they would there would be massive delays. most likely the home was devalued due to interest rate hikes and they no longer qualified for financing.

    • @John_II
      @John_II 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Excellent thought. Faced with that situation, you beg, borrow and steal (not literally) the money to close and then re-assess your options.

  • @reezagoorts2886
    @reezagoorts2886 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Occupancy fees would have been in the contract. Their lawyer should have questioned this initially and maybe asked for the amount to be confirmed prior to signing. My lawyer was able to get my occupancy fees waived by speaking with the developers lawyer directly. Thank goodness.

    • @John_II
      @John_II 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They were in the contract for sure. You've seen those pre-build contracts, they're like 40 pages for a reason. The builders have thought of everything. It's why buying a pre-build is inherently risky.

  • @BritneyWaldron
    @BritneyWaldron 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I'm hearing stories about this every week across the country. Just happened in Alberta

  • @MouthoftheSouth
    @MouthoftheSouth 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Any fusion project i would be staying away from thanks for the heads up

    • @patriciabrant8037
      @patriciabrant8037 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I would buy a maintained older house. I don't like dealing with crooks.

  • @carolineleblanc972
    @carolineleblanc972 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    This is bizarre. When I bought a new construction condo in Toronto back in 2013, sure there were occupancy fees but it was only for 6 months and the fee worked out to be less than my monthly mortgage. So for me those 6 months were financially easier. I remember there was incentive for the builder to register the building once it was finished (thereby ending the occupancy fees), but I can’t recall what the inventive was. I feel sorrry for this couple. $150k is a lot of money to lose 😢

    • @locutus99
      @locutus99 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      it's because interest rates in 2013 are different than in 2023.

  • @slystally9874
    @slystally9874 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Wow. Alot of patience on their end. Someone would have had to go meet their maker if that were me.

    • @fadikifuta
      @fadikifuta 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      uh oh...that escalated quickly

  • @benl6328
    @benl6328 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Another reason why buying a new home is out of the question.

  • @87yugo74
    @87yugo74 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That’s robbery from the developer.

  • @jean-bernardjoly5920
    @jean-bernardjoly5920 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Don’t buy on spec!

  • @bobtepedino5661
    @bobtepedino5661 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Realtor Broker here: they mentioned the lawyer (who supervises the escrow) but didn't mention their estate agent: it sounds like these 2 entered into a very expensive, complicated transaction WITHOUT representation!

  • @kevins9688
    @kevins9688 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Such a poor segment. They failed to explain occupancy fees. Is this something with condos. I bought a detached house few years ago, did not have to pay occupancy fees.

    • @John_II
      @John_II 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Word.
      The buyers want to get out of the contract they already agreed to. The builder wanted the contract to continue and for the buyers to pay the price they agreed to. The buyers walked away and breached the contract, so they forfeit the deposit. That's just how it goes.
      Shame on the news for running this story the way they did because it seems to be misinformation.

    • @nibsniven3497
      @nibsniven3497 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@John_IIWho do you work for?

  • @traceyannmiller1287
    @traceyannmiller1287 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I’ve been paying occupancy fees since July on my condo

  • @starbright1256
    @starbright1256 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Shameful this happened 😢

  • @user9b2
    @user9b2 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How is this legal?

  • @SohaibKhan1
    @SohaibKhan1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Why the Hell didnt they just assign the property? They wouldve gotten all or some of the money back!!

    • @chadpescod-realtor3308
      @chadpescod-realtor3308 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Depends if the contract allows for that or not.

    • @bartholomewcubbins9723
      @bartholomewcubbins9723 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The value has dropped by $200k since they bought it. They'd never find someone to buy it for the price they paid.

    • @John_II
      @John_II 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Excellent thought. Here's why maybe they couldn't: most of these contracts require the builder's consent to have the contract assigned. That being said, I don't if they even tried it.
      The similar option is beg, borrow and steal (not literally) the money to close and then re-sell ASAP to recoup as many losses as possible.

  • @patriciabrant8037
    @patriciabrant8037 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This couple should have had a real estate lawyer. Go through it. I don't trust lawyers working for the builder.

  • @redandwhitefeatheredserpen1156
    @redandwhitefeatheredserpen1156 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    And that's what's wrong with Ontario. They were scammed clearly, obviously pressured to forfeit their dream. Fix this.

  • @chilichickSantaFe
    @chilichickSantaFe 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sounds illegal to me.

  • @dontbefooledbyjumla7869
    @dontbefooledbyjumla7869 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I lost 100k buying a home. My lawyer was useless realtor was only concerned about the commission and the mortgage agent bottled up everything. I started to drink daily one bottle of wine over in a hour (never drank more than 4 times in life before.) Horrible horrible part of my life.. now can't sell the home as the price dropped too much or can keep it bse the interest rates too high. My lesson never trust your community always look for best professionals.

    • @parkerbohnn
      @parkerbohnn 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I lost millions of dollars in Edmonton, Alberta but have hundred of homes in Fort Wayne, Indiana that have done extremely well. Hoping the minimum wage gets hiked soon there.

  • @Buildingenjoyment
    @Buildingenjoyment 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How do you walk away from 140000?

  • @Rick-C-117
    @Rick-C-117 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I don’t understand any of this, and I am in the building industry.

    • @John_II
      @John_II 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The story is basically misinformation. The buyers want to get out of the contract they already agreed to. The builder wanted the contract to continue and for the buyers to pay the price they agreed to. The buyers walked away and breached the contract, so they forfeit the deposit.

  • @pamelahowe1870
    @pamelahowe1870 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    They should be able to sue the builder.

  • @MegaKrackjack
    @MegaKrackjack 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Obvious. There IS risk with new builds, and it ended up being worth less because interest rates are higher. Seems like a whiny couple

    • @John_II
      @John_II 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Glad someone gets it. :)

  • @TurfaTasnim
    @TurfaTasnim 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I don't understand why this couple walked away? They said the builder devalued their home by 200k. What does that mean? The builder reduced prices by $200k for other units? Why did the lawyer ask for cheques for $6600? Was that part of the deposit or something else? This couple's story telling is so vague.

    • @John_II
      @John_II 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Excellent thought. Faced with that situation, you beg, borrow and steal (not literally) the money to close and then re-assess your options.
      The couple's story is vague because they're trying to get out of a contract they already signed/agreed to. The builder is the one insisting on adherence to the contract everyone already agreed to.

  • @cliffm8112
    @cliffm8112 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    This is heartbreaking..Hard earned money down the drain

    • @klnrklnr4433
      @klnrklnr4433 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      live and learn

    • @TheChangNetwork
      @TheChangNetwork 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      better than losing more money.

    • @richarddaigle8777
      @richarddaigle8777 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      this is Canada, all our hard earned money goes down the drain.

  • @marih3286
    @marih3286 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It might not be illegal, but it's certainly unethical.
    Thank you to the couple for sharing their experience.
    Sad but indeed "Buyer Beware"

  • @whatthepick
    @whatthepick 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is where the GST tax break we approved recently to make housing cheaper for developers went huh

  • @ericeandco
    @ericeandco 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Your paying occupancy fees and maintenance on property you don’t occupy or technically own. That sounds insane.

  • @robertstanislaus
    @robertstanislaus 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Most likely high interest rates costs led to the higher occupancy fees

  • @MsMoses-hs5cz
    @MsMoses-hs5cz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    All those fees are pointless and these companies are scammers.

  • @pwilki8631
    @pwilki8631 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Its already unfair to be in Canada.....now this.

    • @kerriwilson7732
      @kerriwilson7732 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I read about Ukraine being a buyer's market, check it out! 🇨🇦

  • @venkuy8839
    @venkuy8839 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Ruthless Builders like Paradise Developers who sold told last phase at higher price are threatening buyers to sue for damages even after keeping hefty deposits. This builder is kind of okay keep deposit and let them go !

    • @TheChangNetwork
      @TheChangNetwork 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      exactly! this developer kept the deposit but they could have made more money if they just forced these two to stick to the original purchase price.

  • @bruce8321
    @bruce8321 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Call your local MP and MPP and demand they look at the laws here ti keep from getting screwed. Go to the newspapers and just keep pestering until somone gives in.

  • @tasnimkhan1624
    @tasnimkhan1624 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I didn’t fully understand, it was a one time occupancy fee that nearly doubled and the monthly maintenance fee that nearly doubled? I didn’t understand how their property was devalued and their reason to walk away from the down payment.

    • @mickenzesmith6809
      @mickenzesmith6809 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tho "occupancy fee" was monthly rent to builder until they 'finished' building the house. Whatever that means.

  • @rustyscrapper
    @rustyscrapper 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Lol, 3 years free condo fees, then when the fees kick in it destroys your resale value. Then in 20 years the fees are 4 times the original amount and your house is worth half because of the fees.
    Never buy anything that has a condo fee, HOA fee, maitenance fee, nothing.
    Freehold or just rent something.
    I dont pay rent on a house i own. Ever.

  • @sheyshah2848
    @sheyshah2848 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    They clickbait the video to make it look like the couple lost $140,000.

    • @MrWookie1981
      @MrWookie1981 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are out $140k. But technically saved $60k. Should the title say that?

    • @John_II
      @John_II 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh yeah. The news here is basically misinformation.

  • @parentrap
    @parentrap 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Dont buy a house thats not built... especially cheap cookie cutter type in suburbs ..usually cut corners in quality!

  • @sherri9300
    @sherri9300 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    So sad ,disheartening 😢

  • @Carolinapetroska
    @Carolinapetroska 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Conclusion : buy a resale instead!