Distance is your friend with cellphones. Even a short distance away gives you substantially less exposure,” she says. Using the phone with a headset or on speaker is safer, she says. Davis tells people if they’re going to carry their cellphone next to their body, put it in airplane mode, which drops the radiation. Parents need to be especially cautious letting kids play with their phone. Kids’ growing tissues are more vulnerable to damage. “We have to stop thinking of these things as toys and playthings for kids,” she says. “These are bad ideas.” Lastly, she says the most dangerous time to use a phone is when the signal is weak. Phones are smart, so they’ll boost their energy output to try to connect to a base tower. “Only use it for a true emergency when the signal is weak,” she says.
@@atlas2296 i agree, many studies shows that cellphone radiation and frequency is not that harmful for human brain and yes, it doesn't develop into cancer
@@marianna7930o re ejkaa a Kku a KKKQilio Ipo uuuuipkjuilopmnn. Byryu kk g tyyfttbbjjuii i😂iûl lol❤❤iuy up😢po po❤ da m da sheep Terra e You as a WWE eu a w hi u hook j. Biujhhijjiuijyuj❤ui p op❤k a❤ 😊I’m❤ 88990-p we to pay out I’ll piii
@RE His parents probably gave him a phone when he was 0yrs old and probably left it by his head as a baby.. That's probably why he can't stop moving.. Lol..
I’m a teacher and this young man got an A+ for excellent research, great presentation and interesting opinion. Hope his fellow students, and us adults too, listen to his message. Well done!
@@JmtheMe IMO this kid has to be brainwashed by his boomer parents, he did not explain anything about the EMF spectrum or why it causes damage. Only radiation=bad and you should avoid it.
He didn’t even say truthful information though ): there is ionizing and non-ionizing radiation, things like phones, computers, and microwaves give off the non harmful kind (Non ionizing). No studies prove or even suggest that it could cause cancer.
I have no doubt you are a teacher. But you are clueless about what's truly harmful radiation as is this kid. He's got the basics down yes, but is confusing what's actually harmful and not really harmful. I was in the nuclear navy... Cell phone radiation is not anywhere close to energy of ionizing radiation. Electromagnetic radiation can be harmful at say right next to an airport radar... that's sufficient energy to cause harm, but not cell phone energies.
Cell phone radiation is a type of radiation that is non-ionizing, which means it is not harmful to humans in any way. Also, there is absolutely no proof among health risks with cell phone use. So this kid did NOT do his research.
I’m honestly trying to avoid conspiracy theories as much as possible, but I can send you several scientific papers showing very serious health effects of cell towers.
I like how he did not even explain ANYTHING about radiation or electromagnetics... Instead he explains radiation=bad. He could've atleast explained that there is ionizing and non ionizing...
that's a bit unfair considering it's a fifth-grader. and it does not matter because it is killing the bees either way. no bees, no agriculture, no humans.
@@eldafyre “Layers of multiple outputs”? Cellular devices emit visible light from the screen, RF waves via connecting to signal towers, and thermal radiation (which any object with temperature higher than absolute zero emits). Are you suggesting that it somehow emits more than that? Does it somehow emit gamma rays that can be detected by a Geiger counter? Does it somehow emit ultraviolet rays that can be germicidal?
@@eldafyre I have actively searched for a mechanism of damage that may prove low-intensity, non-ionising radiation harmful, but have found nothing convincing; that’s why what you’ve said seems like nonsense to me. So, can you substantiate your claims by linking some studies? Since you said there’s a plethora of them, I’m sure you can point me to a few. (I don’t want to see links that only allow me to read an abstract of the study.) Also, I’m curious about the “two frequencies can shatter glass and break cancer cells” you mention. Is this where your fetish for “multiple layers of outputs” comes from? What’s the name of this phenomenon? So far, your layman-style approach to the topic has been unimpressive, and you can’t seem to wrap your head around the syntax of multiple negation. It took me a while to understand that your absurd self-contradiction comes from writing error. I hope you will return with some better answer that’s worthwhile to read.
@@atlas2296 yea right i still have a 4g Android phone and refuse to want to up grade i seen what 5g dose to birds cant imagine having anything strong in my possession
@@stankhunter666 you know that birds are in a completly different taxonomic group?and the size difference matters right?and that the only thing happening to birds is just there migration patterns and not them having cancer or siezures?
Even if he was right which i personaly dont think he is the radiation that comes from your phone wouldnt be strong enough to cause damage to your cells or dna because most technology types dont have a high enough energy level to create that much radiation because its not cancer causing radiation like the sun and even if it was it would be nowhere near the danger zone cuz if it was why is it legalized for companies to manufacture and sell cellphones and stuff but its because none of this i dont belilive is true because there is no evidence
Matthew ...first of all, capitalism doesn't necessarily protect people's health or the environment. Just because you can buy it doesn't make it safe. Mobile phones etc go through no proper safety testing and the levels claimed to be safe are in fact not safe, according to peer reviewed science studies (versus mostly industry funded studies which say ,"It's safe.") Secondly you said there is no evidence. Are you being literal? If you are that means the ,25,000+ studies that have found evidence that non ionising radiation does have biological effects are all bogus, and some of those that WiFi and phones and emfs generally do cause harm. There is a world of difference between no evidence and 25,000+ studies growing daily, unless you can make a good argument (preferably based in science not opinion) for why we should dismiss those studies and instead just trust and believe what the government departments and mobile phone industry (which is now bigger than big pharma) tell us
ADDvantage Hypnotherapy i work at a service provider, EVERY Single router / switch / 4g device box has a "This device complies with the state of X, The contents are know to cause cancer / birth defects / reproductive harm" warning sticker. i might make a video just to show this
If Cell phone radiation is dangerous then what about visible light? It contains more radiation than cell phone ones but no one talked about visible light.
IT"S SO DIFFERENT. IT'S SUCH A DIFFERENT TYPE OF RADIATION. I LITERALLY HAVE TO GO INTO THE SUN LIGHT TO HEAL FROM THE HORRORS OF CELL PHONE RADIATION. YOUR ARGUMENT ABOVE IS ONE OF THE MOST DANGEROUS THOUGHT THREADS YOU CAN PUT OUT THERE. MANY ARE COMMITTING SUICIDE TO GET AWAY FROM CELL PHONE RADIATION. PEOPLE DON'T COMMIT SUICIDE TO GET AWAY FROM SUNLIGHT. ARE YOU FREAKING KIDDING ME?
I have 3 little kids and am on my phone an addictive amount of time. Shouldn't even be typing this. Doing research to downgrade my phone and go old school. Less of a temptation. If cell phones don't cause cancer, what does holding a phone do to your hands? Scrolling? Eye damage? Etc? More than just cancer. Missing out on important moments in life?
In addition to emf dangers, our use of tech is driving sleep problems (blue light exposure), inattention (goldfish syndrome), addiction to tech, less eye contact and socialisation, use of phones at inappropriate times such as meals and hence lack of social learning, and even development of what has been called "digital dementia" or Acquired Attention Deficit Disorder (AADD) and even one of the most likely causes for a recent drop in IQ scores.
Very smart young man. I certainly hope he will become an advocate for this issue. I hope he includes power transformers and other RF emitting machines. Keep up the great work!!! ❤🎉❤
@@Astro-adventure how can it be wrong? We know radiation is not good for anyone, especially children. This combined with the fallout from the jab is just starting to cause big trouble and will continue to do so.
@@gman100 it’s because there’s different kinds of radiation. The kind I work with is what it’s called ionizing radiation. This includes x-rays and gamma rays. These are the ones that go onto brake cells in the body. What this young man is talking about is EM radiation or electromagnetic radiation this is let off by all electronics, but is safe because it does not ionize the air around it or break cells inside the body to a degree even ionizing radiation is safe I’m 15 and I work with radioactive sources.
@@gman100 because all rationtion are not harmful! Look at the visible light; it has more energy than the mobile radiation, but it can not do anything to us.
Speaker made a fallacy in saying radiation causes cancer. The type radiation is very important. All energy is electromagnetic radiation. The light from the sun is much more energetic than cell phones but light isn't causing cancer. You need lots of high energy (frequency) ionizing radiation to become ill. Tiny amounts of ionizing radiation are all around and inside your body and yet DNA repairs itself every second.
@@bay-z9588 I'm a health physicist. Subject matter specialist. Not all types of radiation cause cancer. And not all exposures to ionizing radiation result in cancer.
Not in the slightest. Boomers are completely complacent, integrated, they don’t care about anything. Soy, don’t care. Medicines entering water through urine, don’t care. Washing paint brushes with polymer based paints on them in the kitchen sink, for it to be recycled and drank, and for it to accumulate in nature, don’t care. This glue has dangerous fumes, don’t care. Boomers would just ignore this because wifi is cool and they’re utterly enamoured by technology. From what I’ve seen boomers are the least likely to avoid conventional things for their own safety or out of principle, previous generations we’re skeptics and latter generations are less conforming.
I am not trying to be mean son but you are a nervous wreck. I find that a lot of kids move around constantly like this and I feel like it is from all the videos watched. Games they play on those boxes and cellphone activities. Our kids nowadays need to get outside and run and play and most just do not….. it is very messed up. Parents take those phones away from your kids and get them active in fishing, golfing, running sliding, skating, bowling,gym, climbing, swimming something . But parents now are also addicted to their cellphones. What a world we live in……….technology can be good but if you ask me it is really bad too.
@@eldafyre exactly. Someone will always give an exaggerated, silly ‘fact-check’ response. We’re being made aware of things that we are exposed to which ‘slow-kill’ us. It’s like nobody dies after smoking 5 🚬 a day for a week (as far as I know). But over time, they impact health. We have to think about infants and expectant mothers...the elderly, too. As we get more n more used to iot, smart tech, wearable tech, etc...we should be mindful of the increased saturation of emf exposure.
Oh my gosh....... did you really just say that? Your examples couldn't be more different from the lethal effects of cell phone radiation. It's now understood by some of the world's leading scientists to be the greatest threat to human health that humanity has ever faced. Ever. Wake up.
I don't own a smart phone. When my neighbor gets near the wall of my house with a smartphone it causes a static sound in my radio and that can't be good.
@@heatherjane0808 he is not a genius, but a total opposite of one. he is spreading misinformation. mobile phones emit microwave radiation, which has LESSER energy than visible light.
@@heatherjane0808 if you disagree then state why so. the kid in the video seems to learn a few words and tried connecting them together to say phones emit "radiation" and radiation will cause cancer. if you really look into it, the "radiation" is in the form of electromagnetic waves which doesn't carry enough energy to damage cells. the worst it can do is just cause some heat if it is even noticeable.
I posted that comment a year ago - cant even remember the content of the video. Just my opinion at the time obviously - Take a deep breathe and move on ❤ @@sakn415
Unfortunately, Chloe, that's not what the biological research has been showing. It might be an indirect effect--an epigenetic effect. But it is happening even with low level non-ionizing radiation.
the science is now catching up with the possibility that this is not the case, there are now 100's of studies showing this is untrue, and thousands showing a link between EMFs and ill-health in animals and humans. WHO in 2011 classified Rf as a possible carcinogen and many scientists today believe it should be considered a "probable carcinogen." Of course the studies that find "no link" between RF and harm to humans were funded mostly by the mobile phone industry. This is like cigarettes all over again. remember it wasn't very long ago that it was normal to breathe tobacco filled air almost everywhere you went. The only difference today is that this electrosmog is invisible and most people can't see, taste, or smell it. Which makes it all the more dangerous, imho, as people will be less likely to do anything about it.
@@ADDvantageHypnotherapy The WHO might have put it under a possible carcinogen but that really doesnt mean anything other then, hey it might be dangerous, but we dont know that yet. That might have been due to people complaining about their phones causing them problems or people who believe that phone radiation is actually bad for them trying to ban cell phones.
Who let this kid go on stage and say a bunch of misinformation? Also why is it the older generation still can't understand the difference between ionizing radiation and non-ionizing? Even my grandfather thought the microwave was dangerous to your health.
@@eldafyre what is more ridiculous is that you mistook my post as serious. This is TH-cam and I was joking. On a side note ELDAFYRE beware of G5 towers, they create zombie werewolves. Just saying
@@eldafyre nice try, but you tried to educate me about the smartest position of the transmitter and blah blah blah. The point is you tried to correct a joke. The joke is you. Get some reading comprehension so you don’t make the same mistake.
Interesting. Right, so children explaining how to protect ourselves from cell phone EMF is definitely not professional. Makes perfect sense, thanks for clarifying that (not). How about TED videos with adults in suit and ties who not only ignore EMF but also laugh at EMF protection or at what EMF does to the human mind/body, would that kind of childish insanity fit your professional criteria much better?
@@samuelimanuel7643 Any science can be removed and/or manipulated from any educational systems, especially from America or any other country. Obviously, that's the same limited educational system you still currently worship (in so many ways). Which means that my 30+ years of research and educational are much more optimal than yours, but that's not why I made my first comment. Either way it doesn't matter because we all have our own opinions (no matter what education or etc.)
the electro magnetic spectrum is huge radiation needs to be ionizing to be dangerous, which means that the wave length is small enough to rip electrons from atoms, gamma and x ray radiation are ionizing. then comes Ultra violet which is used for artificial tanning, then comes visible light which we use to see things, then comes micro waves which are used to warm water this wave length is big enough so that we only need e light mesh to block it but small enough as to shake water molecules into heating up this is why micro wave ovens have that screen with little holes the micro waves are to big to pass through, finally we come to radio waves which are as far away from anything that was ever dangerous as you can get, they are used to transport information from your phone to a server and back. if you think that it might be dangerous because its close to micro waves, think of it this way if micro waves where the size of a person radio waves would be the size of the burj khalifa.
Is this for real? I need to know more. Theres conflict in the comments 1st of all. Whats the harr science? I have a newborn. Should i not have my phone near him? Exactly what is a safe distance? I live rural so signal isnt great. This talk feels a bit fear mongering. Can we hear another talk with some more about the science please?
Radiation does not always mean radioactivity. It is not always ionising, and can simply refer to light and heat. No, the science behind this is extremely flawed, if existing at all. You are exposed to more radiation from the sun. A phone can emit somewhat strong electromagnetic fields when calling someone, but I would not worry. Large high-voltage power lines, however, have been (weakly) linked to childhood leukaemia and scientists don’t know how that would work if it does at all, so make of that what you will.
Well-done. But I would disagree about texting someone if you can't call. Texting can cause you to be more addicted to your phone and drawn into it. That can be harmful, too.
He worded it badly. He should’ve said to limit phone use and consider whether a call is necessary. Then say consider sending a text. He said something like ‘text as much as possible’ 🙄.
Great presentation and it could certainly help the masses of the kids to live safer with microwave radiation.But that's all there is. The Plants and animals of the natural world are extincting in large numbers due the effects of microwave radiation (yes there are more than that man reasons to make them extinct but that should not be used as an excuse as microwaves are one of the biggest reasons of animal.and plant extinction as it changes the dna and cause infertility after the 3rd generation).So while people protect themselves and live healthy or don't become sick from the effects of the microwave radiation they will starve to death. (More and more food shortages are here and 2020 will be worse than all previous years.Again there are other reasons but radiation is one of the main.)
Very wise young man! Blessings to him and his family! Mrs Mike ❤ ✝️ I think this was very brave and I also feel like this is child neglect at least. Very cool information young man! Thank you for starting this comment 9 months ago and my Lord and Savior let me see it again, so I edited my. Comment. I hope everyone hears what you are saying, cause youth is my purpose and I will start praying everyone hears this. Thanks alot and have a great day day tomorrow! 🙊
I really don’t understand what is impressive about his, he gives redundant examples, the movement is distracting, and frankly the point he is making in completely unproven. The radiation your exposed to if you were standing on a cellphone tower at max power is 100 millionth of the radiation one absorbs from being outside. Not to mention that the wave length radio waves inhabit (cell phone radiation) are completely safe for humans.
When he sais that cellphones "can" cause all these problems it is because its very very unlikely mainly because the radiation a phone emits is not the radiation we all think of as toxic, it is just small ammounts of heat.
@@respecteffect1202 I like how you guys act like we are sheeples yet you're so brainwashed into this you can't even IMAGINE the possibility of non ionizing to be not dangerous. The real reason that in the settings it tells you that it could be dangerous is to avoid lawsuits, companies want money so why not put a small sticker there that shows you it COULD be dangerous...
His movement made me dizzy.. Good public speaking skills, he will be a lot better as he gets older.. However that hyperactivity needs to be ruled out.. It doesn't seem to be a coping mechanism
You are diagnosing hyperactivity based on a middle school child's delivery of a message in a spotlight in front of a hall full of people which he knows is being recorded and will be put on TH-cam for all (including his peers) to see? His vocal delivery is excellent. I'd give him the grace of some time and experience to get the nervous pacing under control! Meanwhile, congratulations to him for a great job.
@@cogniterra i did not diagnose anything. I merely said it needs to be ruled out as a possible problem. I also did indeed praise his delivery and skills nonetheless
@@eldafyre what do you mean? its not good for a seven year old to be on a phone i agree, but its not because of the radiation, its because it can be bad for kids who are still socialy developing. the radiation thing is just not true. the electromagnetic spectrum is huge! VISIBLE LIGHT is closer to being ionizing then radio waves. only x-rays and gamma rays are ionizing. i fully agree that kids should not have access to phones but this video is just spreading miss information. btw i love your music
@@eldafyre very true, but i still feel this video doesn't go into enough detail, people should do their own research and decide for themselves whether they think a phone is worth it or not instead of being told by someone who doest list any reasons like this video.
lol I am sure electronic devices don't emit UV lights (visible and infrared are nowhere close to ionise the atoms) , this kid doesn't know what he is talking about. But I liked his dialect
Kudos for the kid speaking out however his statement about cell phone radiation is false. Cellphone "radiation" is non ionizing is doesn't have enough energy to cause damage to cells. Cell phone radiation is under radio waves which energies are weak compared to radiation from xrays or gamma rays.
The kid is spot on in this video. There are scientific papers on the dangers of radiation. Did you know that your user agreement for your iPhone actually states that you shouldn't keep the phone too close to your body?
@@Tghhu74eedvji886tbbnn Scientists studied that "harmful" radiation on many people, and only 1 of them had cancer. So its more likely that that one person had other clinical problems and that radiation had nothing to do with that disease.
It's actually true, I became sensitive to cell phone radiation last year (30 years old, and I had a cell phone since I was 13) trust me, I never wanted this to happen... I loved using a cell phone... but the headaches and random pains I would get became too obvious how it only was occurring with my cell phone use.
@@michaelahearl4470 No, its just a nocebo effect. It wont kill you but theres no cure, just try to get it out of your head. Edit: Please go to a doctor, constant head pain may=bad.
@@patricktrzeciak3145 hey brother! It's okay man, you did great tho, i really admire you going up to the stage and speaking in front of a crowd. How are you doing now?
In my opinion the radiation is just gonna be there regardless of whether the phone is there or not, it's just the phone is the closest to the body. In the world we live in today the tech isn't going away most likely so it's something ppl are just gonna have to adapt to over time, unless someone develops a way of reducing radiation. Just my opinion
No it’s not, cell phone radiation emits harmless radiation, the kid is reading from a script that he doesn’t understand that was written by people who did not know anything about radiation
That prancing back and forth and wiggling his body from the waist down was really creepy? He might have brains but there's something not right about this kid, as I have never seen a public speaker wiggle around like that in my life
As someone who understands science.... my brain hurts
This is what brainwashing kids leads to
Same
my cellphone is killingme. I have Burning sensation on on my head.
I CAN'T SEE A SPECIALIST. I NEEED THE LEASIONS CHECK ED OUT,
I would also like to say this young man did a very nice talk. Thanks
Distance is your friend with cellphones. Even a short distance away gives you substantially less exposure,” she says. Using the phone with a headset or on speaker is safer, she says.
Davis tells people if they’re going to carry their cellphone next to their body, put it in airplane mode, which drops the radiation.
Parents need to be especially cautious letting kids play with their phone. Kids’ growing tissues are more vulnerable to damage.
“We have to stop thinking of these things as toys and playthings for kids,” she says. “These are bad ideas.”
Lastly, she says the most dangerous time to use a phone is when the signal is weak. Phones are smart, so they’ll boost their energy output to try to connect to a base tower.
“Only use it for a true emergency when the signal is weak,” she says.
😇
And everything that they said is still wrong
@@atlas2296 i agree, many studies shows that cellphone radiation and frequency is not that harmful for human brain and yes, it doesn't develop into cancer
@@marianna7930o re ejkaa a Kku a KKKQilio Ipo uuuuipkjuilopmnn. Byryu kk g tyyfttbbjjuii i😂iûl lol❤❤iuy up😢po po❤ da m da sheep Terra e You as a WWE eu a w hi u hook j. Biujhhijjiuijyuj❤ui p op❤k a❤ 😊I’m❤ 88990-p we to pay out I’ll piii
When you say to caution if the signal is weak. Do you mean the 4g signal or the four little bars or both?
Stand still(er) mate.
@RE His parents probably gave him a phone when he was 0yrs old and probably left it by his head as a baby.. That's probably why he can't stop moving.. Lol..
Its stimming. He is trying to regulate his nervous system
I made the mistake of watching this at 1.75 speed...
why
Look how fast he moves 😅
Kid, you are a legend
I’m a teacher and this young man got an A+ for excellent research, great presentation and interesting opinion. Hope his fellow students, and us adults too, listen to his message. Well done!
@Brillan Gugel Yep! Just seemed like a misinformed/brainwashed kid.
@@JmtheMe IMO this kid has to be brainwashed by his boomer parents, he did not explain anything about the EMF spectrum or why it causes damage. Only radiation=bad and you should avoid it.
He didn’t even say truthful information though ): there is ionizing and non-ionizing radiation, things like phones, computers, and microwaves give off the non harmful kind (Non ionizing). No studies prove or even suggest that it could cause cancer.
Parched Pancake Let’s hope you’re right. We’re in it no matter if we like it or not. Guess we’ll know more in ten years, probably much too late!
I have no doubt you are a teacher. But you are clueless about what's truly harmful radiation as is this kid. He's got the basics down yes, but is confusing what's actually harmful and not really harmful.
I was in the nuclear navy...
Cell phone radiation is not anywhere close to energy of ionizing radiation. Electromagnetic radiation can be harmful at say right next to an airport radar... that's sufficient energy to cause harm, but not cell phone energies.
"We are all just prisoners here
Of our own device"
- Hotel California by The Eagles
I want to get of the Mr. Spooky Bones Ride.
The ride never ends.
I hear/feel it in my head/brain it hurts.
Cell phone radiation is a type of radiation that is non-ionizing, which means it is not harmful to humans in any way. Also, there is absolutely no proof among health risks with cell phone use. So this kid did NOT do his research.
I’m honestly trying to avoid conspiracy theories as much as possible, but I can send you several scientific papers showing very serious health effects of cell towers.
The who literally has said its a class 2 carcinogen
I got mobile phone when I passed my 10th class 😂
Me too😊
@@RiyaRiya-jh3nv same
I got it after passing 10+2 😅
I got it after getting married 😂😂
That's so early. I'm 28 now and I got my first phone when I was 19 years old. 🤨
Before that I always had a nokia dummy phone.
Idk what's more concerning, this Ted talk or the comments that agree with it.
Thanks
So many jealous people, man the hate. Try public speaking for yourself, and see how you do it.
Its not hard when you have written information in notepad
I like how he did not even explain ANYTHING about radiation or electromagnetics... Instead he explains radiation=bad. He could've atleast explained that there is ionizing and non ionizing...
Wooow
that's a bit unfair considering it's a fifth-grader. and it does not matter because it is killing the bees either way. no bees, no agriculture, no humans.
@Mister Doctor non ionizing can also be bad
@@eldafyre “Layers of multiple outputs”? Cellular devices emit visible light from the screen, RF waves via connecting to signal towers, and thermal radiation (which any object with temperature higher than absolute zero emits). Are you suggesting that it somehow emits more than that? Does it somehow emit gamma rays that can be detected by a Geiger counter? Does it somehow emit ultraviolet rays that can be germicidal?
@@eldafyre I have actively searched for a mechanism of damage that may prove low-intensity, non-ionising radiation harmful, but have found nothing convincing; that’s why what you’ve said seems like nonsense to me. So, can you substantiate your claims by linking some studies? Since you said there’s a plethora of them, I’m sure you can point me to a few. (I don’t want to see links that only allow me to read an abstract of the study.)
Also, I’m curious about the “two frequencies can shatter glass and break cancer cells” you mention. Is this where your fetish for “multiple layers of outputs” comes from? What’s the name of this phenomenon?
So far, your layman-style approach to the topic has been unimpressive, and you can’t seem to wrap your head around the syntax of multiple negation. It took me a while to understand that your absurd self-contradiction comes from writing error. I hope you will return with some better answer that’s worthwhile to read.
Meanwhile kurzgeasagt:excuse me
But yet we have 5g phones in Usa
Because 5G doesn’t harm us
@@atlas2296 yea right i still have a 4g Android phone and refuse to want to up grade i seen what 5g dose to birds cant imagine having anything strong in my possession
Awesome video btw bro
@@stankhunter666 What radiation do you think Cell Phone towers produce?
@@stankhunter666 you know that birds are in a completly different taxonomic group?and the size difference matters right?and that the only thing happening to birds is just there migration patterns and not them having cancer or siezures?
*watches video on mobile cellphone
My brain isn’t braining 0:56 makes no sense
He's right that there are concerns about non-ionizing radiation. Precaution is advised.
Even if he was right which i personaly dont think he is the radiation that comes from your phone wouldnt be strong enough to cause damage to your cells or dna because most technology types dont have a high enough energy level to create that much radiation because its not cancer causing radiation like the sun and even if it was it would be nowhere near the danger zone cuz if it was why is it legalized for companies to manufacture
and sell cellphones and stuff but its because none of this i dont belilive is true because there is no evidence
Matthew Klinedinst IT IS ALL AROUND YOU AT ALL TIMES
Matthew ...first of all, capitalism doesn't necessarily protect people's health or the environment. Just because you can buy it doesn't make it safe. Mobile phones etc go through no proper safety testing and the levels claimed to be safe are in fact not safe, according to peer reviewed science studies (versus mostly industry funded studies which say ,"It's safe.") Secondly you said there is no evidence. Are you being literal? If you are that means the ,25,000+ studies that have found evidence that non ionising radiation does have biological effects are all bogus, and some of those that WiFi and phones and emfs generally do cause harm. There is a world of difference between no evidence and 25,000+ studies growing daily, unless you can make a good argument (preferably based in science not opinion) for why we should dismiss those studies and instead just trust and believe what the government departments and mobile phone industry (which is now bigger than big pharma) tell us
ADDvantage Hypnotherapy i work at a service provider, EVERY Single router / switch / 4g device box has a "This device complies with the state of X, The contents are know to cause cancer / birth defects / reproductive harm" warning sticker. i might make a video just to show this
@@matthewklinedinst3456 hahahah sure,sure...
Gues what ... Normal Light is also electromagnetic Radiation...
Don't go in the sun ...@night stay in the dark
If Cell phone radiation is dangerous then what about visible light? It contains more radiation than cell phone ones but no one talked about visible light.
Because that would prove them wrong. And they want to be right
IT"S SO DIFFERENT. IT'S SUCH A DIFFERENT TYPE OF RADIATION. I LITERALLY HAVE TO GO INTO THE SUN LIGHT TO HEAL FROM THE HORRORS OF CELL PHONE RADIATION. YOUR ARGUMENT ABOVE IS ONE OF THE MOST DANGEROUS THOUGHT THREADS YOU CAN PUT OUT THERE. MANY ARE COMMITTING SUICIDE TO GET AWAY FROM CELL PHONE RADIATION. PEOPLE DON'T COMMIT SUICIDE TO GET AWAY FROM SUNLIGHT. ARE YOU FREAKING KIDDING ME?
Andddd I wonder why this hasn’t gone viral!!!!
Because it is relating to phone which no one wants to leave 😂
Bc it’s wrong
Intervention by powerful parties with vested interests.
Business
Same
Thank you so much for this information! you’re cute and smart 😍
Nah he’s completely wrong. Cell phones are entirely safe.
What about the no-cebo effect where people make themselves sick because they think some invisible things are harmful
I wonder why this hasn’t gone viral
cuz its miss information.
Lot of cell phone Business will go down
Because the people can't handle that much facts
Because PEOPLE don’t wanna hear the truth!
because it is fake
I can get superpowers from cell phones
I have 3 little kids and am on my phone an addictive amount of time. Shouldn't even be typing this. Doing research to downgrade my phone and go old school. Less of a temptation. If cell phones don't cause cancer, what does holding a phone do to your hands? Scrolling? Eye damage? Etc? More than just cancer. Missing out on important moments in life?
This is boomer af
Visible light is more ionized than your cell phone
In addition to emf dangers, our use of tech is driving sleep problems (blue light exposure), inattention (goldfish syndrome), addiction to tech, less eye contact and socialisation, use of phones at inappropriate times such as meals and hence lack of social learning, and even development of what has been called "digital dementia" or Acquired Attention Deficit Disorder (AADD) and even one of the most likely causes for a recent drop in IQ scores.
It doesn't do anything for multiple reasons
Very smart young man. I certainly hope he will become an advocate for this issue.
I hope he includes power transformers and other RF emitting machines.
Keep up the great work!!!
❤🎉❤
song on this soon
Has this changed in five years?
Nope! Just more radiation now!
yes, people have gotten smarter and now lesser number of people fall for this bs. in general people have gotten smarter and do their own research.
I was commenting on someone's comment that now I think, is removed.
May I use a portion of this to get the word out? Thank you.
I’m super late, but please do not send anything out about this. The information here is entirely wrong.
@@Astro-adventure how can it be wrong? We know radiation is not good for anyone, especially children. This combined with the fallout from the jab is just starting to cause big trouble and will continue to do so.
@@gman100 it’s because there’s different kinds of radiation. The kind I work with is what it’s called ionizing radiation. This includes x-rays and gamma rays. These are the ones that go onto brake cells in the body. What this young man is talking about is EM radiation or electromagnetic radiation this is let off by all electronics, but is safe because it does not ionize the air around it or break cells inside the body to a degree even ionizing radiation is safe I’m 15 and I work with radioactive sources.
@@Astro-adventure bro stop playing with radioactivity
@@gman100 because all rationtion are not harmful! Look at the visible light; it has more energy than the mobile radiation, but it can not do anything to us.
Speaker made a fallacy in saying radiation causes cancer. The type radiation is very important. All energy is electromagnetic radiation. The light from the sun is much more energetic than cell phones but light isn't causing cancer. You need lots of high energy (frequency) ionizing radiation to become ill. Tiny amounts of ionizing radiation are all around and inside your body and yet DNA repairs itself every second.
What's the source of your research?
@@bay-z9588 I'm a health physicist. Subject matter specialist. Not all types of radiation cause cancer. And not all exposures to ionizing radiation result in cancer.
Are you saying than using your cellphone all day in a developing body will have no effect?
@@rodneysalomon4908 I've never used a cell phone inside my body.
Really
This is the most "boomer af'' video that I have ever seen.
ikr
fax bruh
Sorry I don't speak your language. You're saying all this is not true AF?
Not in the slightest. Boomers are completely complacent, integrated, they don’t care about anything. Soy, don’t care. Medicines entering water through urine, don’t care. Washing paint brushes with polymer based paints on them in the kitchen sink, for it to be recycled and drank, and for it to accumulate in nature, don’t care. This glue has dangerous fumes, don’t care. Boomers would just ignore this because wifi is cool and they’re utterly enamoured by technology. From what I’ve seen boomers are the least likely to avoid conventional things for their own safety or out of principle, previous generations we’re skeptics and latter generations are less conforming.
Amazing scholar to provide such a well prepared and presented talk. He could be the future of our country, if he doesn't end up in politics.
He got his information completely wrong
I have a kid 2 years old .
Thank you. It's really useful
He is incorrect, don’t listen, cell phone radiation is harmless
Right on !!!
Thank you! 👏
nah this whole speech lies on god🙏
@@patricktrzeciak3145 fr
Guess where he got his research
Where
nahhhh i didn’t even research lmao
@@collincantuseemojis1110 he got hes sources from buzzfeed and the onion,you know the sites that definetly arent making stuff up
@@patricktrzeciak3145 I could tell lol
I am not trying to be mean son but you are a nervous wreck. I find that a lot of kids move around constantly like this and I feel like it is from all the videos watched. Games they play on those boxes and cellphone activities. Our kids nowadays need to get outside and run and play and most just do not….. it is very messed up. Parents take those phones away from your kids and get them active in fishing, golfing, running sliding, skating, bowling,gym, climbing, swimming something . But parents now are also addicted to their cellphones. What a world we live in……….technology can be good but if you ask me it is really bad too.
Big up to this kid
Bud be lucky this aint on insta
Fr fr
I guess what they are trying to say is not to use a dishwasher microwaves your cellphone or WiFi not sure if I can survive without those lol
@@eldafyre exactly. Someone will always give an exaggerated, silly ‘fact-check’ response. We’re being made aware of things that we are exposed to which ‘slow-kill’ us. It’s like nobody dies after smoking 5 🚬 a day for a week (as far as I know). But over time, they impact health. We have to think about infants and expectant mothers...the elderly, too. As we get more n more used to iot, smart tech, wearable tech, etc...we should be mindful of the increased saturation of emf exposure.
It doesn't even matter because what he is saying is false
@@mrlawilliamsukwarmachine4904 Phone radiation will not impact health
Oh my gosh....... did you really just say that? Your examples couldn't be more different from the lethal effects of cell phone radiation. It's now understood by some of the world's leading scientists to be the greatest threat to human health that humanity has ever faced. Ever. Wake up.
I don't own a smart phone. When my neighbor gets near the wall of my house with a smartphone it causes a static sound in my radio and that can't be good.
But it wont affect you in the slightest because Visible Light is more energetic than Infrared, Microwaves, and Radiowaves
This kid is a genius 😮
No he isn’t, he is a child and doesn’t understand what he is saying and it’s also false
@@atlas2296 I disagree
@@heatherjane0808 he is not a genius, but a total opposite of one. he is spreading misinformation. mobile phones emit microwave radiation, which has LESSER energy than visible light.
@@heatherjane0808 if you disagree then state why so. the kid in the video seems to learn a few words and tried connecting them together to say phones emit "radiation" and radiation will cause cancer. if you really look into it, the "radiation" is in the form of electromagnetic waves which doesn't carry enough energy to damage cells. the worst it can do is just cause some heat if it is even noticeable.
I posted that comment a year ago - cant even remember the content of the video. Just my opinion at the time obviously - Take a deep breathe and move on ❤ @@sakn415
It's non ionizing radiation meaning it doesn't break apart and damage dna.
Chloe Barbier thank God cause I'm a kid and I am on my phone alot
Unfortunately, Chloe, that's not what the biological research has been showing. It might be an indirect effect--an epigenetic effect. But it is happening even with low level non-ionizing radiation.
the science is now catching up with the possibility that this is not the case, there are now 100's of studies showing this is untrue, and thousands showing a link between EMFs and ill-health in animals and humans. WHO in 2011 classified Rf as a possible carcinogen and many scientists today believe it should be considered a "probable carcinogen." Of course the studies that find "no link" between RF and harm to humans were funded mostly by the mobile phone industry. This is like cigarettes all over again. remember it wasn't very long ago that it was normal to breathe tobacco filled air almost everywhere you went. The only difference today is that this electrosmog is invisible and most people can't see, taste, or smell it. Which makes it all the more dangerous, imho, as people will be less likely to do anything about it.
@@ADDvantageHypnotherapy The WHO might have put it under a possible carcinogen but that really doesnt mean anything other then, hey it might be dangerous, but we dont know that yet. That might have been due to people complaining about their phones causing them problems or people who believe that phone radiation is actually bad for them trying to ban cell phones.
Meaning it can’t create ions
You are now the CEO of the boomers
ayo bless up on god🙏
@@patricktrzeciak3145 No thanks
thanks patrick for preventing my parents from buying me a phone until im 21.
An excellent presentation
Well done
Radiation yes radioactive no
Sleep deprivation yes cancer no
Who let this kid go on stage and say a bunch of misinformation? Also why is it the older generation still can't understand the difference between ionizing radiation and non-ionizing? Even my grandfather thought the microwave was dangerous to your health.
It is bad and you are rude
@@patriciawhite1206 rude for correcting a kid who didnt do research? you seem to be the rude one here
I love this kid! This is a very great topic that most adults don't even take in consideration! Thanks!
Gawd the moving around was so annoying!!
Stage Fright = Moving
Wow, scare tactics from a child. That microphone he’s using emits as much radiation as modern cell phones. He should have used a hand held
@@eldafyre what is more ridiculous is that you mistook my post as serious. This is TH-cam and I was joking.
On a side note ELDAFYRE beware of G5 towers, they create zombie werewolves. Just saying
@@eldafyre nice try, but you tried to educate me about the smartest position of the transmitter and blah blah blah. The point is you tried to correct a joke. The joke is you. Get some reading comprehension so you don’t make the same mistake.
Cell phones should stay 30 cm from your face and your body in general
This video is full of misinformation
Sunlight is 50 times dangerous than your phone you sould be awar of it not the misleading information
Its ridiculous like why buy a cellphone its just waste of money i only use a laptop and i don't even have a phone because its just ridiculous
Very smart information! Thank you for the truth ❤
It’s not the truth, cell phone radiation is harmless
Stay still !!!!!
Yes please 😊
It may very well be a microwave damage.
@@MagnusJohanssonSWE and a lil more on god
I use airplane mood often especially when i sleep
You dont need to, the radiation is harmless
@TrzpGzd wtf does that even mean?
I'm so impressed WHT this young man. How brave and knowledgeable
he is literally reading from a paper, someone told him what to say. And information is wrong, phones radiation is harmless, so do not worry.
Nonsense
I'm sorry but just uploading this is extremely unprofessional
Interesting. Right, so children explaining how to protect ourselves from cell phone EMF is definitely not professional.
Makes perfect sense, thanks for clarifying that (not).
How about TED videos with adults in suit and ties who not only ignore EMF but also laugh at EMF protection or at what EMF does to the human mind/body, would that kind of childish insanity fit your professional criteria much better?
@@RealityTrailers are you sure you learn science? maybe you could review back your grade 11 and grade 12 textbook about electromaginetic spectrum.
@@RealityTrailers Did you know that everything you can see emits EMF?
@@samuelimanuel7643 Any science can be removed and/or manipulated from any educational systems, especially from America or any other country. Obviously, that's the same limited educational system you still currently worship (in so many ways). Which means that my 30+ years of research and educational are much more optimal than yours, but that's not why I made my first comment. Either way it doesn't matter because we all have our own opinions (no matter what education or etc.)
Natural Technologist Visible light emits more emf radiation than your phone
👏👏👏
On my dads phone
Why is this misinformation still circulating?
the electro magnetic spectrum is huge radiation needs to be ionizing to be dangerous, which means that the wave length is small enough to rip electrons from atoms, gamma and x ray radiation are ionizing. then comes Ultra violet which is used for artificial tanning, then comes visible light which we use to see things, then comes micro waves which are used to warm water this wave length is big enough so that we only need e light mesh to block it but small enough as to shake water molecules into heating up this is why micro wave ovens have that screen with little holes the micro waves are to big to pass through, finally we come to radio waves which are as far away from anything that was ever dangerous as you can get, they are used to transport information from your phone to a server and back. if you think that it might be dangerous because its close to micro waves, think of it this way if micro waves where the size of a person radio waves would be the size of the burj khalifa.
Is this for real? I need to know more. Theres conflict in the comments 1st of all. Whats the harr science? I have a newborn. Should i not have my phone near him? Exactly what is a safe distance? I live rural so signal isnt great. This talk feels a bit fear mongering. Can we hear another talk with some more about the science please?
Radiation does not always mean radioactivity. It is not always ionising, and can simply refer to light and heat.
No, the science behind this is extremely flawed, if existing at all.
You are exposed to more radiation from the sun.
A phone can emit somewhat strong electromagnetic fields when calling someone, but I would not worry. Large high-voltage power lines, however, have been (weakly) linked to childhood leukaemia and scientists don’t know how that would work if it does at all, so make of that what you will.
@Thumb_ thank you!
Well-done. But I would disagree about texting someone if you can't call. Texting can cause you to be more addicted to your phone and drawn into it. That can be harmful, too.
He worded it badly. He should’ve said to limit phone use and consider whether a call is necessary. Then say consider sending a text. He said something like ‘text as much as possible’ 🙄.
But Cell Phone radiation isn't harmful at all, this ted talk is false
Great presentation and it could certainly help the masses of the kids to live safer with microwave radiation.But that's all there is.
The Plants and animals of the natural world are extincting in large numbers due the effects of microwave radiation (yes there are more than that man reasons to make them extinct but that should not be used as an excuse as microwaves are one of the biggest reasons of animal.and plant extinction as it changes the dna and cause infertility after the 3rd generation).So while people protect themselves and live healthy or don't become sick from the effects of the microwave radiation they will starve to death. (More and more food shortages are here and 2020 will be worse than all previous years.Again there are other reasons but radiation is one of the main.)
smart kid
nah the whole speech a lie g, whole thing wrong lmao
Everything in the ted talk is incorrect
@@patricktrzeciak3145 Are you the real Patrick?
Very wise young man! Blessings to him and his family! Mrs Mike ❤ ✝️ I think this was very brave and I also feel like this is child neglect at least. Very cool information young man! Thank you for starting this comment 9 months ago and my Lord and Savior let me see it again, so I edited my. Comment. I hope everyone hears what you are saying, cause youth is my purpose and I will start praying everyone hears this. Thanks alot and have a great day day tomorrow! 🙊
I really don’t understand what is impressive about his, he gives redundant examples, the movement is distracting, and frankly the point he is making in completely unproven. The radiation your exposed to if you were standing on a cellphone tower at max power is 100 millionth of the radiation one absorbs from being outside. Not to mention that the wave length radio waves inhabit (cell phone radiation) are completely safe for humans.
What he is saying is completely false
Ratiation? Wtf.
When he sais that cellphones "can" cause all these problems it is because its very very unlikely mainly because the radiation a phone emits is not the radiation we all think of as toxic, it is just small ammounts of heat.
Yes it is non ionizing radiation which is not harmful.
🐑 🐑
In settings Your cell phones tells you otherwise, don't defend radiation because you can't go a day without your cell phone.
🐑 🐑
@@respecteffect1202 I like how you guys act like we are sheeples yet you're so brainwashed into this you can't even IMAGINE the possibility of non ionizing to be not dangerous.
The real reason that in the settings it tells you that it could be dangerous is to avoid lawsuits, companies want money so why not put a small sticker there that shows you it COULD be dangerous...
@@programmer-mr5vo you are absolutely sheep
@@respecteffect1202 well then tell me the name of that setting
The need to teach this in school
It tends to be bad to spread misinformation in schools, so maybe we shouldn’t teach this
His movement made me dizzy.. Good public speaking skills, he will be a lot better as he gets older.. However that hyperactivity needs to be ruled out.. It doesn't seem to be a coping mechanism
Is hyperactivity a crime?
LOL, we cant get jailed because of hyperactivity. Hyperactivity isn't wrong.
You are diagnosing hyperactivity based on a middle school child's delivery of a message in a spotlight in front of a hall full of people which he knows is being recorded and will be put on TH-cam for all (including his peers) to see? His vocal delivery is excellent. I'd give him the grace of some time and experience to get the nervous pacing under control! Meanwhile, congratulations to him for a great job.
@@cogniterra i did not diagnose anything. I merely said it needs to be ruled out as a possible problem.
I also did indeed praise his delivery and skills nonetheless
Elon musk used a lot of um
I am 7 and I have a phone
Lol
There was a time when kids smoke too. It is not what is normalize, is the fact of what is best
do your own research
@@eldafyre what do you mean?
its not good for a seven year old to be on a phone i agree, but its not because of the radiation, its because it can be bad for kids who are still socialy developing.
the radiation thing is just not true. the electromagnetic spectrum is huge! VISIBLE LIGHT is closer to being ionizing then radio waves.
only x-rays and gamma rays are ionizing.
i fully agree that kids should not have access to phones but this video is just spreading miss information.
btw i love your music
@@eldafyre very true, but i still feel this video doesn't go into enough detail, people should do their own research and decide for themselves whether they think a phone is worth it or not instead of being told by someone who doest list any reasons like this video.
lol I am sure electronic devices don't emit UV lights (visible and infrared are nowhere close to ionise the atoms) , this kid doesn't know what he is talking about. But I liked his dialect
inr this vid makes me mad
Do your research..
He's a kid
Phones emits uv
Kudos for the kid speaking out however his statement about cell phone radiation is false. Cellphone "radiation" is non ionizing is doesn't have enough energy to cause damage to cells. Cell phone radiation is under radio waves which energies are weak compared to radiation from xrays or gamma rays.
Never seen a ted talk this short and un informational
This is completely wrong information, this video has to be taken down 😞
said the 9 year old scientist who publishes his own research. lmfaooooo sit tf down sheeple.
So what's wrong about it?
@@Sara-gl8uecell phone dose not create radiation that can cause cancer or tumor, reasearch has proven
The kid is spot on in this video. There are scientific papers on the dangers of radiation. Did you know that your user agreement for your iPhone actually states that you shouldn't keep the phone too close to your body?
@@Tghhu74eedvji886tbbnn Scientists studied that "harmful" radiation on many people, and only 1 of them had cancer. So its more likely that that one person had other clinical problems and that radiation had nothing to do with that disease.
Stupidest thing i have heard aboit phones giving off radiation
@Skinny Person Yes, but no because microwaves do output non ionizing but in high power, it heats up food that way. Good point tho.
How do you believe mobile phones work?
Saying the truth is not unprofessional.
It's actually very unprofessional to make out that someone's reasonable comment is unprofessional.
thanks for the facts kiddo, rock on
These aren’t facts
Does ipad have radiation?
YES !!!
yes but its not harmful, we humans emit radiation which is stronger than the ones in electronic devices
Good talk
Who told this kid he had to keep moving lol
Radiation effects :)
I swear to God this kid either made this all up or used unreliable sources. He's getting the basic science wrong and it hurts
It's actually true, I became sensitive to cell phone radiation last year (30 years old, and I had a cell phone since I was 13) trust me, I never wanted this to happen... I loved using a cell phone... but the headaches and random pains I would get became too obvious how it only was occurring with my cell phone use.
@@michaelahearl4470 No, its just a nocebo effect. It wont kill you but theres no cure, just try to get it out of your head.
Edit: Please go to a doctor, constant head pain may=bad.
Apart from there being a lack of data to prove cancer link nonetheless everything else he says is accurate.
He thinks radiation is bad.(just like any other kid)
lmao g i made that whole talk off some random site on god
@@patricktrzeciak3145 hey brother! It's okay man, you did great tho, i really admire you going up to the stage and speaking in front of a crowd. How are you doing now?
inr
He's a fifth grader, why not present it yourself?
@@blackjack-ks8zn when i was in fifth grade i knew a lot about radiation and physics in general.
this is a lot of woo
Can this child not be still?
Moving help "Stage Fright" !!!
In my opinion the radiation is just gonna be there regardless of whether the phone is there or not, it's just the phone is the closest to the body. In the world we live in today the tech isn't going away most likely so it's something ppl are just gonna have to adapt to over time, unless someone develops a way of reducing radiation.
Just my opinion
The Ted Talk is false, the radiation isn't harmful in any way shape or form
This boy has more understanding of this than most adults
Very true, definitely more than you.
👏 partially correct. Hopefully he'll learn abojt public speaking skills when he gets older.
Mostly incorrect, mainly about the damage from cell phones
Only societies biggest dummies, let their children play with mobiles, It's poor parenting.
No it’s not, cell phone radiation emits harmless radiation, the kid is reading from a script that he doesn’t understand that was written by people who did not know anything about radiation
I'm not in anyway mocking him but I'm Wonder if he's had too much rad. He can't stand still. :(
Better than standing still monotone
Cell phones radiation isn't harmful
Feel free to elaborate as you seem so confident of such a "fact"...
@@ADDvantageHypnotherapy but till now no case has happened that happened because of mobile radiation
And by the way we've seen big rises in brain cancers and colon cancer. Where do people hold and keep their phones? ;-)
@@ADDvantageHypnotherapy is that important they would be having it from phone only
@@cosmiclegend4181 please clarify what you mean by "they would be having it from phone only"?
Thank you for this 😂 but I’m a child and I don’t want cancer so yeah
Thank you a million times for this video
don't worry it can't give you cancer, millions of people use phones and they don't get cancer.
The video is false and full of misinformation
Hey fella I am a kid and I wish to have one u are the worst
That prancing back and forth and wiggling his body from the waist down was really creepy? He might have brains but there's something not right about this kid, as I have never seen a public speaker wiggle around like that in my life
He is a 5th grader on a stage, I doubt he is super calm and collected
Try public speaking yourself
He is a kid, on a stage, possibly has ADHD