I feel like the art of the interview is dying. The fact that so many media outlets have prerequisite opinions for the reporters they employ means getting to the HEART of a matter takes a backseat to extracting incriminating soundbites to publish
This is such a good point and I wonder if it’s because news outlets are now competing with millions of dynamic TH-camrs and have to get some sort of drama to make catchy headlines. Like “we sat down with Andrew Tate” wouldn’t get any views so they are desperate for drama?
@@TheBehavioralArts Its really funny how much interest Tate draws. A picture of him in the sauna and, according to news, the entirety of Findland mocking him for it made 5 news outlets here in Sweden do articles on it just from what I saw on my Facebook feed. All those articles had hundreds of comments too. Maybe he isnt the most influencal person on the planet, but his name does compete for that title haha.
I‘ve seen body language content from different people and I‘ve got to tell you: You really stand out in the way you structure your videos, giving us context at the beginning, putting clips in while you explain things, briefly going over basics every time… and most importantly, staying as objective as humanly possible. I feel like talking about different sides of what certain behaviors could mean is the only way to really understand behavior. So that‘s why I feel it doesn’t really matter what subject you talk about, it always turns out really interesting and educational!
I don’t understand why someone so lacking in curiosity would pursue a career as a journalist. If you want to be an activist, go be an activist. You want to be a prosecutor? Go be a prosecutor. You don’t have to love or admire your interviewee but you should at least have SOME degree of curiosity about them. Otherwise, what’s the point? Spidey, as always, your integrity and professionalism are incomparable.
@@TheBehavioralArts You mentioned that he should have said he wasn't proud of the webacm stuff and I'm not sure where it is but there is a clip of him saying he wasn't proud. Not sure where it would be tho. Hope this helps lol.
26:30 I also wanted to add that a vibrating leg can be the way someone subconsciously deals with pain. It was something I did for a long time at the beginning of my chronic illness and it was often my husband who noticed it first and he would draw my attention to it so that I could do something about it, as opposed to not noticing it until it was so absolutely overwhelming. So, I just wanted to add that to the list of possible reasons that eomeone might be shaking (really vibrating) a body part.
Yes. He pushes hard during his training and workouts. He doesn't take any pain meds in general. He's not 100% against them for serious injuries. That's paraphrasing what he said in the PBD interview.
I can attest to that being the case with me. I also talk fast like I've had an Espresso or two because of pain. Very high pain at times and long term pain. Pain willI make you shift in your seat also. I also start to answer with what someone wants to hear (not being true) to get to it being over. Stress from pain does make you do wierd things. Don't think that a hard workout caused AT to do this at this time.
I've only watched 7 minutes so far, and I've never seen a video of yours before. As someone who said you don't like Tate in the disclaimer, I am impressed at how unbiased you are with your approach. You stick to the facts and therefore have emphasized your skill in this analysis. I will be watching more of your videos, simply because of how you were focused on the craft. Thank you.
Wasn’t it also the BBC that sent an under prepared journalist to “interview“ Elon Musk about twitter? What’s going on with journalism at these established media networks?
Too busy covering up the paedos in media/government! Seriously - worst thing is here in the UK people are expected to pay annual TV licensing fees to watch TV which essentially encompasses anything BBC related! I don't watch TV and I certainly ain't gonna pay to watch the drivel they put on there.
Thats what happens when your “journalism” is built on clickbait content which a lot of established media networks do. It’s all propaganda driven media. No real journalism going on, just looking for “Aha, gotcha!!” Moments.
Good reporters have backbone and they won't just follow orders. That's why BBC lost lot of them 😏. Today mas media are just propaganda tube. They just saying their version of truth.
They are not only uneducated, they're often in their bubble so misled, that they crash at a real talk so badly. It's like sending a kindergartener to the university of life. Journalism today are used to read what others say they should think. They're not used to think for themselves. So they do not prepare. Often too lazy to do research on their own. Which is reason that main stream media uses over and over the same Textes and the journalists just read them.
I don't comment a whole lot usually, but i do sometimes, and i just wanted to show my support for you by joining. Spidey, you are one of a kind, truly. You are one of two of my very favorite TH-camrs. And you've created something very special here in this little corner of the Internet. Please keep bringing us your brilliant analyses. 🖤
I have so much respect for the way you address your audience; your kindness and consideration to how they might view themselves even if they don't identify with your views is unique. Today's episode was most excellent and isn't Bruce Rivers, the bomb! I love him! Thanks for a great program!
He just did a 5 hour interview that came out yesterday with Patrick Bet-David that has already 7m views in 24 hours. But in that interview he talks about how The BBC was asking for interview since he was still in jail begging him. He kept saying no and without him asking they sent him a list of questions they want to ask. And he said the questions were good and different That seemed interesting and questions not asked before and not these same repetitive questions looking for that got you moment. And as you see in this video and he points it out Tate at the beginning has a welcoming smile and is happy to be there because he thinks it will be a chance to talk about certain things he wasn't asked before from someone who is trying to show both sides. And "BAM" off the bat he gets blind sided by the first question is " have you raped anybody"? This was another black eye for the BBC and the media is actually making people like Andrew that didn't before because they see how unfair he is being treated. Especially if you watch the BBC and they interview a famous tv from England a few days ago who has been proven that he groomed young boys to have sex with for years and years while he worked at the BBC and they start out that interview with " Its been a tough week for you. How are you holding up?"!!! And this guy is a proven child molster of young boys for years, whos brother is also serving 11 years in prison for raping a minor. And the BBc tells people to take it easy on this guy because he's old and his mom is suffering from all of this. And andrew not yet convicted of anything gets to start off the interview with "have you raped anybody? Have you trafficked anybody? Exploited any women for money?" And it only gets worst from there. BBC is a joke.
@footlova The point this guy makes several times in this interview is that this method of "hard hitting" questions straight up is NOT EFFECTIVE and it's much better to ask soft questions to build rapport first. Unless of course the interviewer is just doing it because of some personal gripe they have against men.
She did herself no favors, she dripped contempt, she was extremely confrontational and rude. I agree with you 100% that she would have had more chance of getting the answers she was looking for had she been more prepared and used the interview skills shown in the interrogation video you have… or my Grandma who would say “you catch more flies with honey, than vinegar” .
She was rude? She showed contempt? From minute one he was confrontational and tried to intimidate her. And why wouldn't she show contempt? He's a narcissistic child and a rapist
I see her being intimidated, tense and probably a bit scared. He’s terrifying when he’s angry and confrontational. As someone who’s been in a long relationship with a similar narcissist, it makes me physically ill watching this. We all perceive differently, but only the interviewer knows what she was thinking and feeling in that moment.
She could've been more prepared with proof to back up her statements & tried the emotionally neutral or warm, empathetic approach... But let's face it, you can't change a narcissist. He was going to be defensive & deflective no matter how the topics were introduced. He showed contempt & hostility much more than she did, even before she called him out on the non-answers. He really didn't give her a chance to finish a complete thought, let alone sugar-coat anything.
It’s a fine art to discuss things with a narcissist without letting your emotions get to you (I grew up with one for a parent so I definitely know), but the most frustrating thing is that people like this rely on others behaving and reacting like the interviewer did. That’s how they’re able to spin the narrative and say you’re the emotional one, you’re the rude one etc. Which clearly worked with this interview too, his supporters just came away from this saying he’s even more great because of it and the media just have it out for him. I’m sure lots of people would think that no matter what went down, but even myself as someone who can’t stand Tate, I also thought the interview was poorly done and it was clear they had no interest in hearing what he had to say. Not everyone can handle speaking to people like this which is 100% fine and understandable (just watching videos of him triggers my flight or fight response personally), but then they should’ve made sure they had a reporter on the job who COULD keep calm. If they’d been friendly, or at least neutral, it could’ve opened the conversation to make Tate twist himself into circles, like narcissistic people always tend to do if you don’t take their bait and just let them blab on. Instead they played right into his “media is against me and supressing me” misunderstood victim narrative.
Thank you for your comment about 'Memberships' Spidey; it pertains to me and I appreciate your thoughts on the issue. I am not able to fund or financially support any channel but I'm subscribed with notifications on and always like and comment - I'm glad to see that little bit is appreciated. You're a Class Act Spidey!
I do not like Andrew Tate myself but the interviewers palpable dislike coloured this interview far too much. Coupled with the poor preparation I think nothing was really achieved. I would like someone to interview him in the manner you described to get a better picture of his real opinions. Edit: not sure why people are ignoring the fact that I clearly stated that I dislike the man but nothing was proved in this interview about what he truly said in seriousness. I'd have preferred a better interview that revealed what he's really like, with proof. Showing someone is angry and rude doesn't prove anything. The way the interview was carried out will just vindicate his opinion and comments that people are just out to get him
@@suzygeysen1628 he could have been successfully unmasked, if it had been done, professionally. Her struggle was apparent- maybe, she's off game. I don't know her but it's not a good look. Reminds of Cathy Newman interviewing Jordan Peterson- bothered, from the outset.
@@8thhousemoonrabbit205 maybe there were time constraints and maybe she did exactly what she set out to do...? Fact remains that he lost his temper knowing it was important for him not to, knowing that this would be broadcast. That's on him, not on her.....If this is him on an off-day, what would his level of aggressiveness be on a good day.... ? He wanted to appear in control and despite him barking 'next question' thinking that gave him the upperhand, it actually did the opposite. Who knows how he behaved when camera's were not rolling and he knew himself to be unobserved? He has an image problem and he didn't do himself any favours in this interview. A woman being critical of things he said? He can't have that, that would be like admitting defeat ...That's why he lashed out. This man has had poor male rolemodels as a child and this is what he makes of it. He could've tried to turn his experience into something positive. But no... He needs to confirm his importance (he thinks that when he says it , it's true), he tries to intimidate with loud words and threatening posture. This man has a giant inferiority complex and is ashamed of it. No man who is secure about himself and his feelings needs to confirm to himself that he is important by means of neanderthal opinions (he didn't mean it when he said they were 'equal' he did however mean it when he said a woman in a relationship with him is 'his property') and being all ostentaticious about is 'wealth'..... I pity this man...he needs validation and can't even get it from himself. He would go insane if he could'nt count on the attention and admiration of 'men' (who are in fact mostly adolescents trying to cope with life as we all do). He's holding up a picture of a life anyone can achieve according to him. He's not being honest to his 'followers' and they don't realise that yet. He has a responsability he is unwilling to take. He doesn't care about his subscribers or what their life will be. He cares about money and sadly they are all too willing to give it to him. That's exactly what he admitted to doing when he talked about the scams. There's no difference between his subscribers and the men he scams. He uses vulnerable women and men as long as he can make money off of it. But of course... he said he's a good person so that must mean he is....
I don’t know about that, there’s a part in the interview where he admits a woman belongs to her man and her bits belong to him but a man doesn’t belong to a woman nor do his bits.
If anyone is interested Tate did a 4 hour interview with Patrick Bet-David over on his YT channel, PBD Podcast. I listened to the whole thing and found it rather interesting. Also, for the record Tate was so angry with the interviewer because BBC reached out to him a crap ton of times and told him "don't worry, we're gonna give you a fair shake", "we wanna know how your time in jail was", "we're not coming to accuse you or berate you" etc. And after them reaching out over and over again he finally accept to give them a interview. And then this ignorant woman comes in and does and says the exact things that BBC told Tate they wouldn't do. I think he's so agitated during this whole interview because he's mad at BBC but also mad at himself because he knew better than to invite them in to do a interview. But he decided to give the BBC a chance to interview him because they were BEGGING him to get the interview!!! He explains all of this and more during the 4 hour interview with PBD.
Yes. It's a great interview. I enjoyed it and learned quite a bit. I agree, too. She was so unprepared, surely very nervous. She certainly didn't fix herself up at all. I don't expect gorgeous. But, she could have dressed better, worn her hair nicer, maybe a little lip color and mascara,...something! She didn't really greet him on camera and attempted to steamroll him which was horrible behavior. She was inconsiderate and the wrong person to interview him. She didn't have a chance with that laundry list of bad behavior. He's not perfect. But, he deserved a better interview after what they promised.
@@noxteryn Wasn't using Tate as a "source", I was just repeating what Tate claims during the interview with PBD. I don't see what he would gain from lying about that but okay. 🤷♀️
I just saw a clip of this interview and let me tell you I RAN to your page praying you posted a video. You did not disappoint!! So excited to watch this. 🍿🍿
The detective who interviewed Chris Watts could have taught Lucy a thing or two here. She remained positive and impartial for hours sat across from Watts biding her time to lull him into a false sense of security and to feel comfortable enough to spill what he’d done. Astounding.
Yes! This interview was so frustrating because this woman couldn't hide her disdain for 10 seconds. Has she never heard of a poker face?? What she did here by being cold and immediately going on the attack was never going to work in her favor. It's incredibly disappointing mainstream media can't find more clever (or even less biased) reporters. It shouldn't be this difficult.
I love love love how you handle the more controversial topics. Too often (like you referenced later in your video) our society has become black or white with zero nuance or humility to hear someone out to either validate your stance or be willing to change it when you hear something new that may contradict your previous stance. This is what I’m trying to teach my kids. At the very least, you may never agree with that person, but you may learn their reasoning is based on something other than just evil.
So true. Both sides - the ones who think he’s this dangerous guy as well as the ones who worship this narcissistic fake attention seeking clown - are crazy imho. This interview was a circus 🎪
@@Devi_Seona Even so, arguing and being as confrontational as this interviewer was is still just going to shoot them in the foot. A better approach with a narcissist is almost always going to be staying calm and letting them talk themselves in circles and ruin it for themselves, which they likely will if you just give them the space to do while presenting cold hard facts and not taking their bait. But they’re far too good at staying unaffected during arguments and using everything they have to make you seem like the crazy one if you try to fight them.
@@JMBBrasilI'm inclined to disagree. I think it's more widely accepted and encouraged for women to be vocal and expressive about their feelings. But men experience and share plenty emotions too. Once they feel safe enough to fully express themselves, I don't see any difference with women really.
Men are super emotional. They just aren't allowed to show full range. Women are allowed to be sad for example, but men aren't allowed to express sadness. So sadness comes out as anger because anger is "acceptable". Men confuse limited expressions of emotion with not being emotional. Just not true.
Its not a about the number of emotions felt but of intensity. Women usually feel emotions more deeply and more intense than men. That’s why women cry a lot more even for small things, it’s not society but genetics.
As a woman, I think she despises him AND she didn’t want to provide him any soapbox to grandstand or manipulate. A male interviewer might have been freer to confront and empathize at the same time, but watch out for accusations of complacency or boys club. It was a lose-lose from the get-go. I’m a mom of a teen boy who watches him (and laughs at the perceived boldness), it’s scary hard to undo the toxicity of this guy on teens. I don’t know how many times my son has told me, yeah he’s a POS about some things, but he’s also strong and manly and has good insights. He really underestimates the guy’s venom and underhanded toxicity. I read the journalist’s stance as more of an FU than ill-preparedness, but then I don’t know her…
Good on your son taking the good things that Tate says and discard the things that don’t serve him. He’s clearly has a high level of critical thought instead of just discarding the whole thing. We as human beings can always learn something from anyone
The journalist was incompetent, she didn't do any research and he demolished her as a result. No excuse for that. If your son has proper male role models and parenting at home, he's not going to be overly influenced by people he sees online. Tate says a lot of things which are true but then uses that to manipulate and exploit. His analysis of what's wrong with our society is correct. His prescription is skewed. He only exists as an influence because of our absurd culture that demonises masculinity and leaves boys without aspirational male role models. Feminised men and women aren't what they want to be.
A year later, my son thinks he’s total BS and is sick and tired of the toxicity, thank goodness. I never hear about Tate from him or his friends anymore, I guess his 15 seconds are up except among teenagers and men struggling…
I wouldn’t be accountable to that interviewer either, she was incredibly hostile. If this had been a skilled interviewer, I bet there would have been more accountability
You’re asking him to be accountable for something he his repeatedly saying he is not responsible for. To claim that Tate is making children misogynistic because of the things he has said years ago is a fallacy. That’s not why children see him as a role model. In fact, I would a argue that if it was really about the kids the news would be interviewing Tate fans and getting their perspective. However this is clearly about Andrew himself (nobody even cares about Tristian huh?) and this cancerous idea that is spreading from nothing but word of mouth, people want him to be this evil guy so bad, his fans, including myself, see the complete opposite. The constant attempts to tarnish his name and get rid of him are quite literally creating a divide between the youth and older generations, and is not the youths fault. Everyone needs to wake up man, quickly.
I'll be honest, I have been on the fence about Andrew Tate for awhile. He seems very narcissistic, but his overall message seems like a positive one. After watching the interview, I was actually more of a fan of his than before, because of how disagreeable and full of contempt and clear bias that the reporter had. The press is supposed to report on the news, not make it. In my mind they need to present it objectively or as close to objectively as possible. This reporter went in there with absolutely zero intention on doing that, which plays in to what Andrew has been saying. Now, having said that, as someone who has been using OLD apps for years, I have an absolute hatred for the scammers that target people who are looking for love and view them as ATM's. In fact, what he admitted to doing is borderline criminal fraud in my mind He seemingly bragged about using attractive women online to find guys online who are looking for romance and pretend to be interested in them all while trying to get them to send "them" money. There's no "genius" in that activity- it's called being a scammer and is logically no different than a stripper at a club trying to get guys to buy private dances from them while pretending to care about the guys. It's not "genius" to manipulate people who are looking for romantic connection- it's disgusting, immoral, predatory, and despicable...none of which are qualities or virtues of a "good" person.
@@omegadeity1011 i don’t like the cam girl thing either but the reality is there is and always will be a market for it. They men that participate are equally as responsible for it, they know exactly what they are getting themselves into, the same way the girls do. I don’t understand why people feel the need to defend or condemn adults capable of making their own decisions, man or woman. The simple fact that Andrew Tate even talks about it is a reminder to never be that man throwing their money away to cam girls, in reality it’s just an attack on onlyfans. Tate is condemning the business he was once a part of, while telling boys to never participate, that’s the best message, the one that isn’t being pushed. Everyone is so worried about what everyone else is doing, we should all stop trying to control each other, the internet unfortunately has become a mind reading hub and we all need to take a step back.
@@TheBehavioralArts 23:40 did you actually watch that show? Because if you had you would’ve seen Andrew Tate literally saying, he was going to ANNOY and TRIGGER her which proves he wasn’t being series nor believes the things liberal feminist whine about. Come on man, you gotta do better and be PREPARED yourself.
Would love you to do a video on the Philip Schofield scandal here in the UK. I found his own recent interview with the BBC extremely interesting from a body language point of view.
Would love to see more interviews with her to see if this is her normal way of interviewing someone “controversial”. How she interviews someone likable. Through your analysis, she actually got me feeling bad for Tate 😅 The way she opened the interview was a trainwreck. But I think I get what she was trying at. It’s hard to be a woman around men like that, cause he doesn’t have a basic sense of respect for her, as he would if she was a male interviewer. And by playing nice, it feels like you are submitting to his ways, and I can totally relate to being allergic to that.
Thank you for making this video! I appreciate the quick lesson on interview decorum and questioning. It reminded of a journalism elective course I took last year. :) love your videos! 💖💖
She clearly went in 'for the kill' completely unprepared for the outcome. How could she be so dense? I love the expressions of surprise when AT bites back. (Not an AT fan, but this woman completely botched this interview and made herself look like an idiot) Feels like she brought a pillow to a gunfight.
I think he looked like a bigger idiot though because he’s so in love with himself. His narcissism is on full display and the way he treats and thinks about women is shocking. Pretty much the way he treats everyone is shocking. He’s clearly a horrible person.
I think this sums it up nicely, it’d be one thing to go in with her attitude if you have the receipts and debate skills to back it up once you get going, but it felt like she just dropped her opinion about how awful he is and then he took over from there talking over her like it seems he usually does. I don’t blame her for her feelings and definitely think Tate is the awful one (I probably couldn’t go two seconds in the same room as him without breaking down crying lol), but she was not the right person for this interview.
These weren't even the worst things said by the interviewer. She brought up the "machete" story and demonstrated that she hadn't understood it at all, and Tate called her out on it, though he would have done better to give her more rope. She said it was about him hitting her with a machete because he cheated on her, whereas it was actually about her trying to kill him with a machete. She also mentioned the rape allegation even though they had been previously dropped. She's only mentioning that to make him look bad. Then there was the part when she said "I'm glad you find that funny" when she was pretending he was laughing about "intimate parts belonging..." whereas he was actually laughing about being the "most dangerous man on the planet". Also, why is she "glad" unless she's coming with some agenda.
Thank you for this balanced and nuanced assessment. It was mortifying to see her interview a man like him without evidence for her argument .Her performance seemed inadvertently to support his appalling views on women.
The machete story was one actual instance of taking him out of context. But it only took a prior ten seconds of listening to get it right. Other vile things he says cannot be explained away so easily.
@@mariancoffey8271 his "appalling views on women" include saying women have more intrinsic value than men. And that men have a duty to risk their lives protecting women. This is misandry far greater than any misogyny he's said, but misandry is so normalised in society, we don't notice it.
As always, Spidey you've done a very interesting analysis of both the BBC reporter and Tate. Also want to say just how great you look these days! And, that I think you demonstrate a real level of professionalism in conducting your analysis. Personally, I would have enormous trouble remaining detached and not being triggered if I had to analyze this guy a. Which explains why I watch & listen to you do it. Thanks again, Spidey, for putting out such fascinating content. 👏👏👏👏👏
It blows my mind when I hear Lucy say 'enough' as an answer to 'how many?' Tate repeated her answer in a tone that sounded like he was genuinely disappointed with her lack of competence.
Don't know this lady but I think she came with her own biases & very likely so abhorrent & disgusted towards him that she just doesn't want to take a kinder approach. As bystanders, we know that's not wise. However, when human emotions & prejudices take over, I think it's possible for us to lose our objectivity.
@@uv77mc85 that's not the point. As Spidey pointed out, her losing objectivity as an interviewer causes her to lose ground when she comes antagonistic without evidence or receipts. She didn't have enough to pin him down but reversed the power play instead.
I respect how balanced your analysis is. That reporter did a disservice to the people he regularly offends by being completely unprepared but obviously disliking him and knowing who he is. Why in the world did she not present the facts? He did exactly what he would do. Deflect, brag, not take responsibility. There is not a single clear win for her. I would love to see someone skilled, with facts, doing an interview with him.
I agree completely. This was a difficult watch. Extremely disappointing. It needed to be handled with more skill. Tate is a crafty guy. A skilled interviewer could have got alot more out of this interview.
I think their mistake was sending someone who just hates him. It’s like she didn’t feel the need to be more prepared because in her mind she’s already heard enough. She had no further curiosity. They needed someone who is well aware of the crappy stuff he says and does but that doesn’t hate him. Someone who has done genuine curiosity in the phenomenon.
I don't think the purpose of the interview is to let him articulate, but to pissed him off to the poin of anger, so the media can make him look bad, once again. The problem with letting someone who let Tate speak, will make Tate able to say what he wants.
@@JWalters388if you've seen Tate's interviews, rarely does he get angry in such a way to "spill the beans". BBC just thought they were morally Superior, so they didn't put any effort
Spidey, I want to commend you for being able to conduct yourself as the professional that you are & as always appreciate your input. Your videos are always interesting and respectful. Though I am not nearly as good as you are at removing my personal feelings from situation. Sooo, since my parents always stated that if you haven't anything nice to say...I will leave it at that. Good job Spivey! 👏 👏👏👏
This was so interesting. I followed your suggestion & watched the full interview in preparation for the analysis & had the most unexpected outcome; I came away ALMOST in favour of Andrew Tate. Certainly more so than I did the interviewer! I think the interview was incredibly poorly done; it was like they chose the person on the team who hated him the most & it could never be an unbiased interview. She seemed completely unable to move from any point she was making & react to things being said; she had an agenda & she was sticking to it. I cannot claim to be a professional interviewer by any stretch however I do work on a 121 basis with people daily & being able to extract information from people & communicate at all different levels according to the situation is part of what I do. Had I been sat 121 with Andrew Tate, off the top of my head I would have done 2 main things differently: -most importantly, knowing the type of person he is (thinking mainly of his ego), I would have approached the interaction with a friendliness, almost flattery, & openness to suspend my personal feelings in order to encourage him to explain things rather than put him on the defensive. -I would have had a bullet point list of evidence for the points I am making, with reference numbers for the relevant clips in a folder so I could pull them up if needed!
I agree with everything in this comment! It’s not even about liking or disliking Andrew Tate, it’s about the BBC asking him for an interview and then doing this! If you don’t like the guy and can’t hide that; don’t interview him
@@TheBehavioralArts exactly! Thank you so much for responding to my comment, I never expect a response (as you get so many comments, & commenting on TH-cam threads in general often feels very much like throwing a needle into a haystack) & am always over the moon when I see you have responded! I was wondering, have you considered covering the recent Philip Schofield interview at all? It’s big news in the UK at the moment & I’ve been looking for an analysis having watched the interview; I found one but it was very simplistic & also talked about which direction his eyes were pointing & what that meant etc which really turned me off! I found myself wishing it was one of your videos!
@@nieveswhite3859 he didn’t. If you go to the BBC’s video it’s entirely comments in his favor. If you don’t like him you should want a more competent interviewer who could have actually called him out effectively with evidence
I want to take clips of YOU Spidey. Your method of speaking is incredible. I was so impressed with how you discussed Tate but, even when you mentioned membership. You are a very kind and classy person. We need more people like you in the world.
A very in-depth, articulate, and intelligent analysis of this interview. I love how human beings can tell you just as much while speaking as they can with their mouths closed. It’s a real science and very interesting. Thank you for this video and your analysis. 🙏
I think the BBC should have sent a man..because knowing what he has said in the past, he would have considered them more an "equal" and possibly opened up more. Her dislike of him showed through completely
I thought the same at first, but then again, I think it could have worked with a woman who was willing to play a role. Because the problem is that he felt confronted, and particularly by a woman, and so he just went into deny-and-obfuscate mode. If a man had come into the interview the same way as she did, it would have probably been about the same, cause he would be on some "What color is YOUR Bugatti" BS. It would be a pissing contest. The one thing men with big egos love is to talk about themselves, no matter who is listening. It would not be in his nature to shut up even in the presence of a woman. The interviewer seems to me to be a woman who, perhaps, does not read subjects well and maybe rebels against the idea of coaxing answers in that way, preferring to be "no-nonsense" and asking the hard questions.
A woman inclined to use diplomacy could have done it smh he can't even help himself. Grandiosity is what he does he only tried to turn down the volume. The second, he leaned forward to intimidate her, in his own home she should have taken the advantage, confidently. Ugh it must be how, football fans feel watching an easy pass, get dropped.
@@FiryaFYI Idk, I don't know him and my BP rises a bit every time I see his clips. I think he's the type of person that everyone has a strong bias for one way or the other.
Hey just a small note on the "shaking legs" that can be interesting; you can make your legs shake like that when you position your foot in a certain way and lean on it, right? and personally I sometimes do that because it's a soothing, funny sensation. So maybe it's stress in this case but idk, I also do that when I'm just comfortable :)
Candace Owens did a much better interview with Tate. She did play that clip of the "Lover boy method". He acknowledged it. Owens was much more complimentary, and she seems like she actually likes Tate, but she got much more out of him. He still sounded very rehursed, and repeated the same thing several times, but that was a much better interview.
Fabulous job as always, Spidey. Judgmental, condescending interviewers rarely achieve more than riling up viewers already backing their position, in my experience. It’s maddening to watch 😳💐
The interview is exactly what the BBC wanted and why this reporter was chosen to give it. They wanted more fireworks but it is controversial enough to do the job.
Spidey, when referencing the shaking leg at 25:24, there is a cluster actions to account for in his behavior. While he is saying "that's fine" there is a jaw thrust, lip grooming, lip retraction, expression of contempt, another jaw thrust, and lip grooming again with lip retraction. He is also adapting with his ring finger while his hands steeple downward and presents at least two leftward head shrugs while his gaze reverts down and away and his head drops slightly before he lifts his head again smiling and attempting to recover. These are not what I expect to see if he really feels in control at this moment. I don't know if he is more concerned with controlling himself, the interview, or the entirety of the situation.
He wants to control the interviewer so he can brag about it for the next 100 years and it reinforces how useless women are for anything other than his playthings or money makers.
People try to glean too much from body language. Certainly there are psychological drivers that dictate how people move and speak. However you can never see those drivers directly, you can only intuit them based off of the body language downstream of it. Even with clusters of body language, there can be multiple interpretations and inferences made as to what caused that cluster to appear, and in the end they are only inferences. Nobody is a mind reader, or else the top poker players would always be able to tell when their opponents were bluffing. I appreciate body language analysis, but I wouldn't put all your emphasis and confidence in that one single tool. There are many other things at work which you cannot see, and you cannot glean them all from a person's body language.
Looking good Spidey!! ❤ And wonderful analysis as always! You’re so refreshing in comparison to almost everything else on the internet these days! I admire you so much! You are amazing at what you do and the wonderful person that you are shines through as well. You can’t help but be drawn to you! I love that you’re not hostile either way and that you understand things are not just black and white. People these days seem to have the attitude that if you are not for what they are that you’re obviously on the other end against them and it’s just not the case.
Hi Spidey, I love all of your various analysis. I wondered if you would be able to analyse the BBC interview with Philip Schofield. I know it's very UK centric but it's been big news this side of the pond.
It's entirely true that if she had done a more effective job interviewing, the interview likely would have gone far better, but that wouldn't have been the interview that the BBC wanted to air. They didn't want to air their reporter casually interacting, building rapport, and _then_ hitting Andrew Tate with hard questions when he least expected, _and_ having the receipts if he tried to evade the questions (which, as you pointed out, this woman was sorely unprepared on). They wanted a bunch of people with 45-second attention spans to see that Andrew Tate is a vile piece of shit (as you can clearly see, from the way the interviewer interacts with him from the very beginning, that she detests him) and to hear him deny the allegations (they already believe he's guilty, they just wanted to hear him deny it, so that they can write the denial off as a lie). And then they tune out. That's the narrative that the BBC wanted.
Just thank you for creating a positive community on the internet. So often it’s filled with people who want to badger and belittle. It’s nice that there are a few places like this online.
At 31:00 he simply explained his past life and what the woman did of her own free will to extract more money from men. He never said he made her do it or told her to do it that way. He simply explained her method from observation. However you did a great job on this interview
Hey. Thanks for watching. I would encourage you to watch that segment again. He starts by saying they worked for him, then says when they were sleeping “I had staff” on their WhatsApp pretending to be them, then he said “we were bringing in money from the sky” (we implies involvement) and at the end he takes credit for putting this operation together. I’m not sure how anyone can miss that this whole concept was his idea and he profited from it. It wasn’t her method, it was his method, he takes credit for it.
I just watched a video by another body language "specialist" Enigma, as a complete novice in this field I am instantly regretting wasting my time watching that video when this video was available. I'm sure Enigma is accomplished in his own right but this video is so much clearer and packed with much more information and insight.
Yeah, not to be mean but it’s hard to compare either two. Enigma is a smart kid who read a couple of books and does a good job explaining certain things. Spidey teaches this to companies, university classes and he’s one of the best mentalists in the world so he applies this on stage and huge tv shows. It’s more than knowledge and education it’s hard experience.
Maybe but it seems that the women involved are getting involved with him willingly. He isn't keeping them chained in his basement lol they're free to go.
A pimp....really? You can dislike someone for many reasons but to get others to dislike that person, people distort reality, believe whatever they hear, and become sheep following the most radical leader.
This is not the first time BBC messed up big time. They also messed up with the Elon Musk interview. I have no idea why they are so uninformed regarding their subjects. It's really mind boggling she went there without at least one piece of counter evidence.
It seems like this interviewer went in with all her feelings and preconceived perceptions of him and caused this interview to go from 0-60 in 30 seconds. Interviewers, in my opinion, have to have the ability AND responsibility of setting the tone for any interview they conduct. Like you said, had she started off with friendly greetings and curious open- ended questions, she (and we) would've gotten more out of him because there would have been some level of trust and confidence built with him. Her approach will only give him more fuel to "prove his [mysoginistic] point/s".
@@12gauge599 he’s the best. It blows my mind sometimes how he can ignore his own opinions and even devalue his own opinions sometimes and just talk behavior
And imagine how much more effective it would’ve been if they were having a fairly pleasant conversation and then, still being polite and staying calm, she’d asked a question he didn’t like. The way she went about it now anyone can just say “well she was rude and clearly hates him so why would he even want to be nice or talk to her at all” (I don’t agree with that personally, but can easily see others thinking that). A missed opportunity for sure.
36:02 I think he was laughing at the audacity of her trying to force an appology from him. "You come to my house and hostily ask me questions, don't even bring evidience, and think I'm going to apologize." Baiscally, "you attack me and expect me to be apologize?" I don't think he was lauging at the idea of an apology in general. I actually think it was a big act of him to suggest he should be more careful - implying he has not been perfect. I surely wouldn't elicit any sort of concessions to someone who had been that hostile to me in an interview.
I think its key to talk calmly about Mr. Tate. He is exceptional at exciting and bringing emotional reaction to situations. When the chaos erupts and he remains calm because he planned for said chaos to erupt he is viewed as tactical or prepared when really anyone who walked into a situation with a plan to cause chaos will always be more calm than the people who were not prepared for that interaction. I believe Mr. Tate has made clear his intentions are for wealth, control, and exposure and this is also what he preaches to his followers. I think the key thing to remember here is anyone who preaches to lie always will not refrain from lying to those they preach to. Mr. Tate preaches wealth, control, and exposure so it makes common sense that he would be using his audience to achieve it just as he tells his audience to use people and situations in their life to achieve the same. I think Mr. Tate, just like any person, should be viewed with discernment and careful critical thought. Everyone has valid points because everyone has real experiences, but it is each of our own jobs to deal with those things ourselves and with our support system. Mr. Tate feeds off sharing his view in a light that can cause negative interactions between loved ones, strangers, and friends. When Mr. Tate is talking about manipulating people you can't only believe he is manipulating the people that don't agree with him. It is far more likely he is manipulating most of the people he reaches. This is due to the context of manipulation being portrayed as positive in Mr. Tates representation of it. Take every person who claims to have the answers to your struggles with a large grain of salt. Most truly helpful advice is not a quick fix or something that requires you to manipulate people. It is often introspective and takes time to grow. Wealth is only as meaningful as what you use that money to do, control is only as valuable as how you manage your self, and exposure is only as good as the council and morals you keep and the message you share.
I'm not a fan of his either but this doesn't sound like an interview...it sounds like an interrogation. She sounds like she's already decided he's guilty. Even if he is or isn't she has no objectivity.
Did anyone else have a smile/smirk on their face when Spidey was getting triggered and had to take some deep breaths to calm himself back down??? No, just me??? Lol
She doesn't seem like a very objective journalist. She obviously dislikes him and comes off hostile from the get-go. I'm not familiar with her, but I'd think the BBC could've sent someone who could be more objective. That being said, my only exposure to Tate has been THIS video, and he DOES seem like a real piece of work.
One of my coworkers said "Oh this person did xyz" That means their lying!" I said "Not necessarily. Did you establish their baseline? Was there a cluster?" The coworker had no idea whatsoever I meant by "baseline" and "cluste." I referred her to your videos.
@Shavon X I was reluctant to recommend them as their energy is quite strong. Spidey's energy is strong, but suptle. It's not as "in your face. She's easily overwhelmed.
@@SousiQ I think Spidey is the best behavioral analyst on TH-cam. I think because his experience reading people is in the real world and not exclusively interrogation rooms he brings a very real and relatable element to this.
@Thomas Rios Exactly. He speaks with respect, not talking down to you or over your head. He really truly wants to teach us what to look for and don't just assume because you saw one twitch.
@@SousiQ yep. He doesn’t talk about it on the channel but he teaches mentalists/magicians how to use behavioral analysis to improve their performances and he has award winning products on the market for it. He’s a legend amongst magicians for his cold reading skills.
I love this channel! You really make me more aware of my own speech, surroundings, statements, questions, answers, movements, actions/reactions and thank you so much for that
Another very interesting and insightful video Spidey. It's really disappointing to see such an important interview, given that it is the first after his release from prison, end up being such a mess and like the title says- a total trainwreck! Especially considering how you've managed to do your own research and found the very evidence that she was presenting that she didn't even have with her! Also the hair looks fire btw, you might want to give the number of whoever you used to Andrew XD
When he says I should be more cautious about the things I am saying what he really means is I should stop telling people about the crimes I'm committing and just get on with committing them
Yes, if you look at the articles written by the BBC about Tate, almost all of them are by women. Presumably women are better at understanding a man who talks primarily to men about issues facing men.
I didn't know who Andrew Tate was until you encouraged us to preview his interview with the BBC. Great analysis (as always 🙂)! Is there any "allowance" or "handicap" given to the analysis when there is a clear psychological disorder like Narcissistic Personality Disorder? I'm not a psychologist, however he does exhibit the symptoms of the disorder and his reaction to criticism is spot on with it as well.
A lot of conditions can affect someone’s behavior. We just consider it in the baseline. With Tate for example, resume statements, 1 st person pronouns, and quick denials are part of his baseline. Could it be NPD; sure, do I specifically care why it’s happening? Not really, I just note that it is.
@@TheBehavioralArtsHey Spidey! When it comes to the baseline, are there ways to identify when someone is deviating from it from deception vs when they might deviate from it because they sense they aren’t convincing their interviewer/audience with their responses? Would this be amplified or muddied when analyzing people who are entertainers, since they would be wired to avoid giving stale or repetitive answers to keep their audience engaged?
Wow I hadn't expected this! The way she opened was awful! I always hate it when people say my name and follow it with a definitive statement. It always puts me on the defensive immediately. What a terrible setup to make someone open up! And she managed to make the rest of the interview sound even more like an interrogation! I would have expected better from a professional. She was so openly hostile, I was constantly reminded of Judith (Alan's ex in Two and a half Men)! Overall, I think you made a couple of good points. I'm impressed at your valiant effort to keep this a balanced and fair analysis, despite your own opinions. I have no doubt that this interview would have been much more interesting and constructive if you had conducted it. Too bad they sent this Karen instead...
In my opinion, it doesn't matter if you like Andrew Tate or not, this "reporter" was immediately hostile, unprofessional, unprepared and was an embarrassment to the BBC.
I have watched all of Bruce Rivers videos on Andrew Tate. He's a brilliant lawyer and I wish more people would see the real info out there to be fully informed. Your content is amazing!!! Thank you :)
Same here, he is awesome and one of three lawyers I follow on lawtube. He does a great walk-through of the case against AT, even if he doesn't fully understand how the legal system works in countries that is members of the European Union.
This really shows how important it is with the right person doing an interview. The fact that they didnt pick one shows how poorly prepared this was. There are SO MUCH material on Tate to build an interview with. Spidey, Tate has a video he did himself after this interview, something to do another video on Tate? Would be really interesting to see you expand on a "How to" on interviewing someone like Tate!
What I takeaway from both Elon Musk especially and also somewhat Andrew Tate, they are both more intelligent than the interviewers. The interviewers think they are the smartest person in the room, but they so are not. And the beauty of Elon is he is neuroatypical and he has the typical innocent quality of autistic spectrum people. At the same time he is a very talented and brilliant businessman and inventive thinker. Both BBC interviewers are highly stressed and touch themselves constantly. I have to wonder what the management at Abby is like.
19:20 exactly this! She probably dismissed the idea of bringing receipts, thinking it not necessary, as she is already convinced the whole world condemns Andrew Tate along with her.
I believe that admitting we've fallen short (admitting we're wrong) in anything takes a massive amount of vulnerability. It is easier to be vulnerable in a space which feels safe and grounded. Perhaps we could've seen a reflective attitude in Mr. Tate if this atmosphere had been created. To me: Safe does not mean everyone agrees with you. It means that those in that space believe you are a human with humanity. That you are trying to do the best you can with what you have, even if that best falls short. Then everyone in a space can approach as equals and not feel misunderstood before they reach the discussions that matter. Outside of such a space, individuals who believe they are good (like Andrew Tate) will be arguing for their self-worth as a human being, rather than the heart of hurt which has arisen from whats been said and done. Hope this made sense and brought value to the discussion.
U gave an amazing break down I like your balanced take u made me a subscriber sir 👏 I also think Tate would have no problem apologizing for some thangs said but not by her rude apology demands
“Dangling beautiful women in front of unconfident men”. See, Spidey, these men have such an inflated sense of self worth that they think these gorgeous women are in love with them. These are men with ego issues of THAT nature. It’s always shocking to me the amount older, uglier, not at lot going for them, men who think they deserved a beautiful young woman. What is that?
Competitiveness, - and low self worth/lack of individualistic identity - between men and how their rankings reflect upon, those who are considered or consider themselves, 'the least'. They're playing a game with each other, using women as things along with other, Actual things and some get bitter about how these material things, or lack thereof, bespeak them.
@@8thhousemoonrabbit205 The reason dangling beatiful women in front of unconfident men is such a common and effective thing is because it is MUCH harder for a man to get experience (and thus confidence) in having a relationship or even just interacting well with the opposite gender. It is not because these men consider themselves ''worth of being with a beautiful women'' but because they are unconfident due to lacking that valuable experience. In contrast it is really easy for a woman to get that experience, because in our current modern societies women have FAR more social value. Completely ignoring most people of the other gender and believing they only deserve the very top % is more a thing women do then, as well. Women have a lot (as several times as much) more options then men do. That is simply the reality of the gender dynamic when it comes to relationships or social interaction.
@@Tiasung women have an abundance, of unwanted focus and projections that are mirages, facades, death traps and pits of despair, made flesh. Makes my mouth dry, to briefly contemplate the Bullets, grenades, land mines and shrapnel bombs, I've avoided and may I remain, thusly blessed🖤. People need to gather their particulars and get some self love ... SELF love
Dude…seriously I’m 4 minutes in and have to correct you. His smile is the kind that jocks use to intimidate with over confidence to hide their fear. 40 years of martial arts training and fighting taught me that. Totally disagree with you on this.
@@sondra4789 all of his "strategies" are like Cliff notes version of BOOK OF FIVE RINGS with some ART OF WAR while using elementary Holocaust Denier techniques and reframing Pickup artist speech. Very easy to see through. Inside he is a little boy that masquerades as macho. His face is nothing but a mask which is why he usually hides behind sunglasses. His prime directive is intimidation and gets easily frustrated with a minor threat. Classic bully.
The best commentary on Andrew Tate Iv seen. Fair and balanced. Suspect your political views are more to the left. Why can’t most lefties reason and explain their position like this. I’m sure both sides would find a lot more middle ground .
Only thing that really made me like him was when I found out he built an animal shelter in Romania. I've adopted like 10 dogs from animal shelters so i can relate.
He attracts women like that because they’ll take his abuse for money and bling. They have daddy issues, he has mommy issues, they’re the only women who wouldn’t see him from a mile away and RUN! I can’t even stand him. He’s a POS in my opinion. He’s said enough, he needs to just go away.
Spidey you are so unbiased. You cover all the topics that are interesting. I so value your analysis and opinion. I use your ..... Not sure the right words... Tools in my daily life. Keep on keeping on man. You're doing good in this world!
He flat out lied about putting on his website where he sold his 'Hustlers University' course, that his method is to get girls to fall in love with him, get them over to Romania, then get them to do camera sex work for him. This is the 'business method' he was selling his paid up members, and forms part of his trafficking strategy. Tate took it down, but it's still out there. That's just one aspect of how he exploited those women. He also admitted on his site to pretending he was paying tax for them, but really keeping the money. He's a lying, cheating, exploitative scumbag, currently under house arrest, lying in an interview is nothing to him.
hater , did he shutdown "University" ?, because it's payments and so many things shutdown by government, and he approached ladies who in the "field of sex work/ok girls " and train them to be worker like every sexual industry and paid them 25-75% of all income (in any other field of work nobody will give you 1-3% max in almost every field ,and he didn't put gun in her head and give command to do things ) so don't be a jealous fool and say anything, as any corporate " manipulation" , he also manipulate people and it's true , doesn't mean he is the worst kind of people
@@terencedorsey6717 it might b, he was just in jail. But there r things that r immoral but legal so that falls under "mores". Dont participate in the acts u can speak out against them but that's about it in a free society
Hey Spidey can you put chapters in your videos so if we want we can skip the part where you present yourself and make disclaimers? I've been following you for about a couple of years so I know who you are and your good intentions. It's always interesting to watch your videos, thank you for the work you put here mate! 😃
First, she came at him with guns blazing, which took me by surprise, and that set the mood from the start. It would have been a great interview if she had done her homework. Maybe they could have had someone else do the interview because it's obvious she can't stand being in the same room with him.
Why lately so many interviewers just fail that their job? Especially when they know that it will be televised!?! Your breakdowns Spidey are as always incredible! Wish you would start doing interviews :) x
It wasn't jail time, he's a scamming azzhole who puffs up and tries to control of every...like bioches, money and scamming people. He cares less bout screwing this over. Dude is scammy hustler with a website.
Character or not, it’s definitely not the kind of character to have kids look up to in my personal opinion. You can be a strong, dominant male who shows kindness and respect to others.
@@Don-po8vl i appreciate what you were getting at. I know some people can say they don’t like someone or something and have no knowledge of that person or thing in general.
I feel like the art of the interview is dying. The fact that so many media outlets have prerequisite opinions for the reporters they employ means getting to the HEART of a matter takes a backseat to extracting incriminating soundbites to publish
This is such a good point and I wonder if it’s because news outlets are now competing with millions of dynamic TH-camrs and have to get some sort of drama to make catchy headlines. Like “we sat down with Andrew Tate” wouldn’t get any views so they are desperate for drama?
@@TheBehavioralArts I think it's around 50/50 Drama/Agenda
@@TheBehavioralArts and that strategy is making them fail miserably instead of making them look better… 🤭
@@TheBehavioralArts Its really funny how much interest Tate draws. A picture of him in the sauna and, according to news, the entirety of Findland mocking him for it made 5 news outlets here in Sweden do articles on it just from what I saw on my Facebook feed. All those articles had hundreds of comments too. Maybe he isnt the most influencal person on the planet, but his name does compete for that title haha.
Try watching lex fridman and joe rogan.
I‘ve seen body language content from different people and I‘ve got to tell you:
You really stand out in the way you structure your videos, giving us context at the beginning, putting clips in while you explain things, briefly going over basics every time… and most importantly, staying as objective as humanly possible. I feel like talking about different sides of what certain behaviors could mean is the only way to really understand behavior.
So that‘s why I feel it doesn’t really matter what subject you talk about, it always turns out really interesting and educational!
Yes
Well said Fescha!! Spidey is truly the best🤗
so true
The BBC really needs to teach their reporters how to research and gather data.
Yup!
So close to that Elon Musk fiasco interview too. Mainstream media don't know how to do unbias interviewing anymore.
I completely agree. She was not a great choice for this particular interview
They just need to lose government funding.
This was one of the dumbest and most narc. interview I’ve seen in a while. Both sides were embarrassing
I don’t understand why someone so lacking in curiosity would pursue a career as a journalist. If you want to be an activist, go be an activist. You want to be a prosecutor? Go be a prosecutor. You don’t have to love or admire your interviewee but you should at least have SOME degree of curiosity about them. Otherwise, what’s the point?
Spidey, as always, your integrity and professionalism are incomparable.
So well said!
@@TheBehavioralArts You mentioned that he should have said he wasn't proud of the webacm stuff and I'm not sure where it is but there is a clip of him saying he wasn't proud. Not sure where it would be tho. Hope this helps lol.
She wants him put in jail and throw away the key
26:30 I also wanted to add that a vibrating leg can be the way someone subconsciously deals with pain. It was something I did for a long time at the beginning of my chronic illness and it was often my husband who noticed it first and he would draw my attention to it so that I could do something about it, as opposed to not noticing it until it was so absolutely overwhelming. So, I just wanted to add that to the list of possible reasons that eomeone might be shaking (really vibrating) a body part.
Yes. He pushes hard during his training and workouts. He doesn't take any pain meds in general. He's not 100% against them for serious injuries. That's paraphrasing what he said in the PBD interview.
I can attest to that being the case with me. I also talk fast like I've had an Espresso or two because of pain. Very high pain at times and long term pain. Pain willI make you shift in your seat also. I also start to answer with what someone wants to hear (not being true) to get to it being over. Stress from pain does make you do wierd things. Don't think that a hard workout caused AT to do this at this time.
I do this when my body is rushing with energy to burn. A big caffein spike would also make me do this.
Agree yes, it can also be a nervous system issue
I've only watched 7 minutes so far, and I've never seen a video of yours before. As someone who said you don't like Tate in the disclaimer, I am impressed at how unbiased you are with your approach. You stick to the facts and therefore have emphasized your skill in this analysis. I will be watching more of your videos, simply because of how you were focused on the craft. Thank you.
Wasn’t it also the BBC that sent an under prepared journalist to “interview“ Elon Musk about twitter? What’s going on with journalism at these established media networks?
Too busy covering up the paedos in media/government! Seriously - worst thing is here in the UK people are expected to pay annual TV licensing fees to watch TV which essentially encompasses anything BBC related! I don't watch TV and I certainly ain't gonna pay to watch the drivel they put on there.
They have a narrative and an agenda. No pursuit of truth. Hence why so unprepared.
Thats what happens when your “journalism” is built on clickbait content which a lot of established media networks do. It’s all propaganda driven media. No real journalism going on, just looking for “Aha, gotcha!!” Moments.
Good reporters have backbone and they won't just follow orders. That's why BBC lost lot of them 😏. Today mas media are just propaganda tube. They just saying their version of truth.
They are not only uneducated, they're often in their bubble so misled, that they crash at a real talk so badly. It's like sending a kindergartener to the university of life. Journalism today are used to read what others say they should think. They're not used to think for themselves. So they do not prepare. Often too lazy to do research on their own. Which is reason that main stream media uses over and over the same Textes and the journalists just read them.
I don't comment a whole lot usually, but i do sometimes, and i just wanted to show my support for you by joining. Spidey, you are one of a kind, truly. You are one of two of my very favorite TH-camrs. And you've created something very special here in this little corner of the Internet. Please keep bringing us your brilliant analyses. 🖤
Thank you so much 🤗 glad you’re enjoying the channel! And thanks for the support!
Well said!
I agree 100% and was happy to find Nate the Lawyer on this channel. It’s nice to see impartial analysis from these two. It’s a real rarity
Who's the other favorite TH-camr?
Yes 😊
I have so much respect for the way you address your audience; your kindness and consideration to how they might view themselves even if they don't identify with your views is unique. Today's episode was most excellent and isn't Bruce Rivers, the bomb! I love him! Thanks for a great program!
He just did a 5 hour interview that came out yesterday with Patrick Bet-David that has already 7m views in 24 hours. But in that interview he talks about how The BBC was asking for interview since he was still in jail begging him. He kept saying no and without him asking they sent him a list of questions they want to ask. And he said the questions were good and different That seemed interesting and questions not asked before and not these same repetitive questions looking for that got you moment. And as you see in this video and he points it out Tate at the beginning has a welcoming smile and is happy to be there because he thinks it will be a chance to talk about certain things he wasn't asked before from someone who is trying to show both sides. And "BAM" off the bat he gets blind sided by the first question is " have you raped anybody"? This was another black eye for the BBC and the media is actually making people like Andrew that didn't before because they see how unfair he is being treated. Especially if you watch the BBC and they interview a famous tv from England a few days ago who has been proven that he groomed young boys to have sex with for years and years while he worked at the BBC and they start out that interview with " Its been a tough week for you. How are you holding up?"!!! And this guy is a proven child molster of young boys for years, whos brother is also serving 11 years in prison for raping a minor. And the BBc tells people to take it easy on this guy because he's old and his mom is suffering from all of this. And andrew not yet convicted of anything gets to start off the interview with "have you raped anybody? Have you trafficked anybody? Exploited any women for money?" And it only gets worst from there. BBC is a joke.
Andrew crushed this incompetent BBC interviewer.
It was ITV.
@footlova The point this guy makes several times in this interview is that this method of "hard hitting" questions straight up is NOT EFFECTIVE and it's much better to ask soft questions to build rapport first. Unless of course the interviewer is just doing it because of some personal gripe they have against men.
She did herself no favors, she dripped contempt, she was extremely confrontational and rude. I agree with you 100% that she would have had more chance of getting the answers she was looking for had she been more prepared and used the interview skills shown in the interrogation video you have… or my Grandma who would say “you catch more flies with honey, than vinegar” .
She was rude? She showed contempt? From minute one he was confrontational and tried to intimidate her.
And why wouldn't she show contempt? He's a narcissistic child and a rapist
I see her being intimidated, tense and probably a bit scared. He’s terrifying when he’s angry and confrontational. As someone who’s been in a long relationship with a similar narcissist, it makes me physically ill watching this. We all perceive differently, but only the interviewer knows what she was thinking and feeling in that moment.
@@marsaeille She is clueless and plainly stupid
She could've been more prepared with proof to back up her statements & tried the emotionally neutral or warm, empathetic approach... But let's face it, you can't change a narcissist. He was going to be defensive & deflective no matter how the topics were introduced. He showed contempt & hostility much more than she did, even before she called him out on the non-answers. He really didn't give her a chance to finish a complete thought, let alone sugar-coat anything.
It’s a fine art to discuss things with a narcissist without letting your emotions get to you (I grew up with one for a parent so I definitely know), but the most frustrating thing is that people like this rely on others behaving and reacting like the interviewer did. That’s how they’re able to spin the narrative and say you’re the emotional one, you’re the rude one etc.
Which clearly worked with this interview too, his supporters just came away from this saying he’s even more great because of it and the media just have it out for him. I’m sure lots of people would think that no matter what went down, but even myself as someone who can’t stand Tate, I also thought the interview was poorly done and it was clear they had no interest in hearing what he had to say.
Not everyone can handle speaking to people like this which is 100% fine and understandable (just watching videos of him triggers my flight or fight response personally), but then they should’ve made sure they had a reporter on the job who COULD keep calm. If they’d been friendly, or at least neutral, it could’ve opened the conversation to make Tate twist himself into circles, like narcissistic people always tend to do if you don’t take their bait and just let them blab on. Instead they played right into his “media is against me and supressing me” misunderstood victim narrative.
Thank you for your comment about 'Memberships' Spidey; it pertains to me and I appreciate your thoughts on the issue. I am not able to fund or financially support any channel but I'm subscribed with notifications on and always like and comment - I'm glad to see that little bit is appreciated.
You're a Class Act Spidey!
It’s more than appreciated! Thanks so much for being here ❤️
Same for me. I with you! I like and comment to support! 💞🙏💞
I do not like Andrew Tate myself but the interviewers palpable dislike coloured this interview far too much. Coupled with the poor preparation I think nothing was really achieved. I would like someone to interview him in the manner you described to get a better picture of his real opinions.
Edit: not sure why people are ignoring the fact that I clearly stated that I dislike the man but nothing was proved in this interview about what he truly said in seriousness. I'd have preferred a better interview that revealed what he's really like, with proof. Showing someone is angry and rude doesn't prove anything. The way the interview was carried out will just vindicate his opinion and comments that people are just out to get him
He showed us exactly xho he is. That's what's been achieved.
@@suzygeysen1628 he could have been successfully unmasked, if it had been done, professionally.
Her struggle was apparent- maybe, she's off game. I don't know her but it's not a good look. Reminds of Cathy Newman interviewing Jordan Peterson- bothered, from the outset.
@@8thhousemoonrabbit205 maybe there were time constraints and maybe she did exactly what she set out to do...? Fact remains that he lost his temper knowing it was important for him not to, knowing that this would be broadcast.
That's on him, not on her.....If this is him on an off-day, what would his level of aggressiveness be on a good day.... ? He wanted to appear in control and despite him barking 'next question' thinking that gave him the upperhand, it actually did the opposite.
Who knows how he behaved when camera's were not rolling and he knew himself to be unobserved?
He has an image problem and he didn't do himself any favours in this interview. A woman being critical of things he said? He can't have that, that would be like admitting defeat ...That's why he lashed out.
This man has had poor male rolemodels as a child and this is what he makes of it. He could've tried to turn his experience into something positive. But no... He needs to confirm his importance (he thinks that when he says it , it's true), he tries to intimidate with loud words and threatening posture. This man has a giant inferiority complex and is ashamed of it. No man who is secure about himself and his feelings needs to confirm to himself that he is important by means of neanderthal opinions (he didn't mean it when he said they were 'equal' he did however mean it when he said a woman in a relationship with him is 'his property') and being all ostentaticious about is 'wealth'.....
I pity this man...he needs validation and can't even get it from himself. He would go insane if he could'nt count on the attention and admiration of 'men' (who are in fact mostly adolescents trying to cope with life as we all do).
He's holding up a picture of a life anyone can achieve according to him. He's not being honest to his 'followers' and they don't realise that yet. He has a responsability he is unwilling to take. He doesn't care about his subscribers or what their life will be. He cares about money and sadly they are all too willing to give it to him. That's exactly what he admitted to doing when he talked about the scams. There's no difference between his subscribers and the men he scams. He uses vulnerable women and men as long as he can make money off of it.
But of course... he said he's a good person so that must mean he is....
I don’t know about that, there’s a part in the interview where he admits a woman belongs to her man and her bits belong to him but a man doesn’t belong to a woman nor do his bits.
I couldn’t have said it better!
If anyone is interested Tate did a 4 hour interview with Patrick Bet-David over on his YT channel, PBD Podcast. I listened to the whole thing and found it rather interesting. Also, for the record Tate was so angry with the interviewer because BBC reached out to him a crap ton of times and told him "don't worry, we're gonna give you a fair shake", "we wanna know how your time in jail was", "we're not coming to accuse you or berate you" etc. And after them reaching out over and over again he finally accept to give them a interview. And then this ignorant woman comes in and does and says the exact things that BBC told Tate they wouldn't do. I think he's so agitated during this whole interview because he's mad at BBC but also mad at himself because he knew better than to invite them in to do a interview. But he decided to give the BBC a chance to interview him because they were BEGGING him to get the interview!!! He explains all of this and more during the 4 hour interview with PBD.
Yes. It's a great interview. I enjoyed it and learned quite a bit. I agree, too. She was so unprepared, surely very nervous. She certainly didn't fix herself up at all. I don't expect gorgeous. But, she could have dressed better, worn her hair nicer, maybe a little lip color and mascara,...something! She didn't really greet him on camera and attempted to steamroll him which was horrible behavior. She was inconsiderate and the wrong person to interview him.
She didn't have a chance with that laundry list of bad behavior.
He's not perfect. But, he deserved a better interview after what they promised.
That PBD interview was great!
Yes, he should dissect this podcast
It would be a huge mistake to use Andrew Tate as a source. Where did you hear that BBC reached out to him repeatedly? Was it Andrew Tate?
@@noxteryn Wasn't using Tate as a "source", I was just repeating what Tate claims during the interview with PBD. I don't see what he would gain from lying about that but okay. 🤷♀️
I just saw a clip of this interview and let me tell you I RAN to your page praying you posted a video. You did not disappoint!! So excited to watch this. 🍿🍿
The detective who interviewed Chris Watts could have taught Lucy a thing or two here. She remained positive and impartial for hours sat across from Watts biding her time to lull him into a false sense of security and to feel comfortable enough to spill what he’d done. Astounding.
Yeah she was trained hard for it.Its not easy to be a detective.
Great example
Yes! This interview was so frustrating because this woman couldn't hide her disdain for 10 seconds. Has she never heard of a poker face?? What she did here by being cold and immediately going on the attack was never going to work in her favor. It's incredibly disappointing mainstream media can't find more clever (or even less biased) reporters. It shouldn't be this difficult.
I love love love how you handle the more controversial topics. Too often (like you referenced later in your video) our society has become black or white with zero nuance or humility to hear someone out to either validate your stance or be willing to change it when you hear something new that may contradict your previous stance. This is what I’m trying to teach my kids. At the very least, you may never agree with that person, but you may learn their reasoning is based on something other than just evil.
So true. Both sides - the ones who think he’s this dangerous guy as well as the ones who worship this narcissistic fake attention seeking clown - are crazy imho. This interview was a circus 🎪
Not in Tate case tho, he is just a malignant narcissist.
That was not the only time he said that. He gone on other interviews and have said the same thing
@@Devi_Seona Even so, arguing and being as confrontational as this interviewer was is still just going to shoot them in the foot. A better approach with a narcissist is almost always going to be staying calm and letting them talk themselves in circles and ruin it for themselves, which they likely will if you just give them the space to do while presenting cold hard facts and not taking their bait. But they’re far too good at staying unaffected during arguments and using everything they have to make you seem like the crazy one if you try to fight them.
Agreed 👍 great video
It's quite fascinating to me how people like this say "woman are so much more emotional than men" but my guy, anger and annoyance is ALSO an emotion.
@@JMBBrasil What does it mean to be emotional?
@@JMBBrasilI'm inclined to disagree. I think it's more widely accepted and encouraged for women to be vocal and expressive about their feelings. But men experience and share plenty emotions too. Once they feel safe enough to fully express themselves, I don't see any difference with women really.
Men are super emotional. They just aren't allowed to show full range. Women are allowed to be sad for example, but men aren't allowed to express sadness. So sadness comes out as anger because anger is "acceptable". Men confuse limited expressions of emotion with not being emotional. Just not true.
Its not a about the number of emotions felt but of intensity. Women usually feel emotions more deeply and more intense than men.
That’s why women cry a lot more even for small things, it’s not society but genetics.
@@Ahhh707 Crying helps the emotions not be so intense. And, I've seen some INTENSE anger from men, some nearly fatal to others.
As a woman, I think she despises him AND she didn’t want to provide him any soapbox to grandstand or manipulate. A male interviewer might have been freer to confront and empathize at the same time, but watch out for accusations of complacency or boys club. It was a lose-lose from the get-go. I’m a mom of a teen boy who watches him (and laughs at the perceived boldness), it’s scary hard to undo the toxicity of this guy on teens. I don’t know how many times my son has told me, yeah he’s a POS about some things, but he’s also strong and manly and has good insights. He really underestimates the guy’s venom and underhanded toxicity. I read the journalist’s stance as more of an FU than ill-preparedness, but then I don’t know her…
Good on your son taking the good things that Tate says and discard the things that don’t serve him. He’s clearly has a high level of critical thought instead of just discarding the whole thing. We as human beings can always learn something from anyone
The journalist was incompetent, she didn't do any research and he demolished her as a result. No excuse for that.
If your son has proper male role models and parenting at home, he's not going to be overly influenced by people he sees online. Tate says a lot of things which are true but then uses that to manipulate and exploit. His analysis of what's wrong with our society is correct. His prescription is skewed.
He only exists as an influence because of our absurd culture that demonises masculinity and leaves boys without aspirational male role models. Feminised men and women aren't what they want to be.
It's good that you teen boys have critical thinking skills and their emotion don't overpower them.
A year later, my son thinks he’s total BS and is sick and tired of the toxicity, thank goodness. I never hear about Tate from him or his friends anymore, I guess his 15 seconds are up except among teenagers and men struggling…
@@myfirstnovel he thinks or you successfully reprogrammed him?
I wouldn’t be accountable to that interviewer either, she was incredibly hostile. If this had been a skilled interviewer, I bet there would have been more accountability
I agree 10000%
You’re asking him to be accountable for something he his repeatedly saying he is not responsible for. To claim that Tate is making children misogynistic because of the things he has said years ago is a fallacy. That’s not why children see him as a role model. In fact, I would a argue that if it was really about the kids the news would be interviewing Tate fans and getting their perspective. However this is clearly about Andrew himself (nobody even cares about Tristian huh?) and this cancerous idea that is spreading from nothing but word of mouth, people want him to be this evil guy so bad, his fans, including myself, see the complete opposite. The constant attempts to tarnish his name and get rid of him are quite literally creating a divide between the youth and older generations, and is not the youths fault. Everyone needs to wake up man, quickly.
I'll be honest, I have been on the fence about Andrew Tate for awhile. He seems very narcissistic, but his overall message seems like a positive one.
After watching the interview, I was actually more of a fan of his than before, because of how disagreeable and full of contempt and clear bias that the reporter had.
The press is supposed to report on the news, not make it. In my mind they need to present it objectively or as close to objectively as possible. This reporter went in there with absolutely zero intention on doing that, which plays in to what Andrew has been saying.
Now, having said that, as someone who has been using OLD apps for years, I have an absolute hatred for the scammers that target people who are looking for love and view them as ATM's. In fact, what he admitted to doing is borderline criminal fraud in my mind
He seemingly bragged about using attractive women online to find guys online who are looking for romance and pretend to be interested in them all while trying to get them to send "them" money.
There's no "genius" in that activity- it's called being a scammer and is logically no different than a stripper at a club trying to get guys to buy private dances from them while pretending to care about the guys.
It's not "genius" to manipulate people who are looking for romantic connection- it's disgusting, immoral, predatory, and despicable...none of which are qualities or virtues of a "good" person.
@@omegadeity1011 i don’t like the cam girl thing either but the reality is there is and always will be a market for it. They men that participate are equally as responsible for it, they know exactly what they are getting themselves into, the same way the girls do. I don’t understand why people feel the need to defend or condemn adults capable of making their own decisions, man or woman.
The simple fact that Andrew Tate even talks about it is a reminder to never be that man throwing their money away to cam girls, in reality it’s just an attack on onlyfans. Tate is condemning the business he was once a part of, while telling boys to never participate, that’s the best message, the one that isn’t being pushed.
Everyone is so worried about what everyone else is doing, we should all stop trying to control each other, the internet unfortunately has become a mind reading hub and we all need to take a step back.
@@TheBehavioralArts 23:40 did you actually watch that show? Because if you had you would’ve seen Andrew Tate literally saying, he was going to ANNOY and TRIGGER her which proves he wasn’t being series nor believes the things liberal feminist whine about. Come on man, you gotta do better and be PREPARED yourself.
She could have at least had the exact quotes prepared with the interview, dates, and times.
And context...
Right!
Even if she did he would just interrupt her
Would love you to do a video on the Philip Schofield scandal here in the UK. I found his own recent interview with the BBC extremely interesting from a body language point of view.
Yeah, tbh, i would be interested in seeing this, good shout.
Agree, I would love to see that as well.
Please
Totally agree. I thought of a Spidey video as soon as I saw that interview!
@@twirlingparasol_ Yeah me too 😀
Would love to see more interviews with her to see if this is her normal way of interviewing someone “controversial”. How she interviews someone likable.
Through your analysis, she actually got me feeling bad for Tate 😅 The way she opened the interview was a trainwreck. But I think I get what she was trying at. It’s hard to be a woman around men like that, cause he doesn’t have a basic sense of respect for her, as he would if she was a male interviewer. And by playing nice, it feels like you are submitting to his ways, and I can totally relate to being allergic to that.
I wonder how long she had to prepare for the interview?
Thank you for making this video! I appreciate the quick lesson on interview decorum and questioning. It reminded of a journalism elective course I took last year. :) love your videos! 💖💖
I came here for the lesson on body language and also got an excellent lesson on journalism. Well done Spidey. 👏
Haha Im no journalism expert but I THINK I can do a better job than her 😂
Most humans could do a better job.
@@thinkbeforeyoutype7106 Dude, how old are you?
@ThinkBefore YouType your user name is very ironic
@@gugumasondo192 What is ironic about it?
She clearly went in 'for the kill' completely unprepared for the outcome. How could she be so dense? I love the expressions of surprise when AT bites back. (Not an AT fan, but this woman completely botched this interview and made herself look like an idiot) Feels like she brought a pillow to a gunfight.
I think he looked like a bigger idiot though because he’s so in love with himself. His narcissism is on full display and the way he treats and thinks about women is shocking. Pretty much the way he treats everyone is shocking. He’s clearly a horrible person.
@@sondra4789 Absolutely agree :-)
She works for the BBC. Even after the Twitter debacle their journalists go into interviews like this, bahah.
So true.
I think this sums it up nicely, it’d be one thing to go in with her attitude if you have the receipts and debate skills to back it up once you get going, but it felt like she just dropped her opinion about how awful he is and then he took over from there talking over her like it seems he usually does. I don’t blame her for her feelings and definitely think Tate is the awful one (I probably couldn’t go two seconds in the same room as him without breaking down crying lol), but she was not the right person for this interview.
These weren't even the worst things said by the interviewer. She brought up the "machete" story and demonstrated that she hadn't understood it at all, and Tate called her out on it, though he would have done better to give her more rope. She said it was about him hitting her with a machete because he cheated on her, whereas it was actually about her trying to kill him with a machete. She also mentioned the rape allegation even though they had been previously dropped. She's only mentioning that to make him look bad. Then there was the part when she said "I'm glad you find that funny" when she was pretending he was laughing about "intimate parts belonging..." whereas he was actually laughing about being the "most dangerous man on the planet". Also, why is she "glad" unless she's coming with some agenda.
Thank you for this balanced and nuanced assessment. It was mortifying to see her interview a man like him without evidence for her argument .Her performance seemed inadvertently to support his appalling views on women.
The machete story was one actual instance of taking him out of context. But it only took a prior ten seconds of listening to get it right. Other vile things he says cannot be explained away so easily.
@@mariancoffey8271 his "appalling views on women" include saying women have more intrinsic value than men. And that men have a duty to risk their lives protecting women. This is misandry far greater than any misogyny he's said, but misandry is so normalised in society, we don't notice it.
As always, Spidey you've done a very interesting analysis of both the BBC reporter and Tate. Also want to say just how great you look these days! And, that I think you demonstrate a real level of professionalism in conducting your analysis. Personally, I would have enormous trouble remaining detached and not being triggered if I had to analyze this guy a. Which explains why I watch & listen to you do it. Thanks again, Spidey, for putting out such fascinating content. 👏👏👏👏👏
I don't know Andrew Tate. But honestly even I would not accept that behaviour of this interviewer. I would stop that interview right away
It blows my mind when I hear Lucy say 'enough' as an answer to 'how many?'
Tate repeated her answer in a tone that sounded like he was genuinely disappointed with her lack of competence.
Don't know this lady but I think she came with her own biases & very likely so abhorrent & disgusted towards him that she just doesn't want to take a kinder approach. As bystanders, we know that's not wise. However, when human emotions & prejudices take over, I think it's possible for us to lose our objectivity.
Any decent person is disgusted by him. He has bragged about everything she accused him of
@@uv77mc85 that's not the point. As Spidey pointed out, her losing objectivity as an interviewer causes her to lose ground when she comes antagonistic without evidence or receipts. She didn't have enough to pin him down but reversed the power play instead.
@@uv77mc85 NPC detected 😂
@@igbokwenu4934 Why do you have a weird african name? I don't talk to Africans. Go scam someone else.
I respect how balanced your analysis is. That reporter did a disservice to the people he regularly offends by being completely unprepared but obviously disliking him and knowing who he is. Why in the world did she not present the facts? He did exactly what he would do. Deflect, brag, not take responsibility. There is not a single clear win for her. I would love to see someone skilled, with facts, doing an interview with him.
I doubt Andrew Tate would agree to an interview with someone skilled.
I agree completely. This was a difficult watch. Extremely disappointing. It needed to be handled with more skill. Tate is a crafty guy. A skilled interviewer could have got alot more out of this interview.
@@Beth-pf6oo so are you saying he is one who choosed the BBC interviewer and made sure she is not skilled ... what nonsense is that?
@@KaiyaKN26 you mean like Piers Morgan?
@@kingsta3174 He's definitely better skilled.
I think their mistake was sending someone who just hates him. It’s like she didn’t feel the need to be more prepared because in her mind she’s already heard enough. She had no further curiosity. They needed someone who is well aware of the crappy stuff he says and does but that doesn’t hate him. Someone who has done genuine curiosity in the phenomenon.
are you related to Miss Behave by any chance??
@@chozusmakavelli You know it 🫰
I don't think the purpose of the interview is to let him articulate, but to pissed him off to the poin of anger, so the media can make him look bad, once again. The problem with letting someone who let Tate speak, will make Tate able to say what he wants.
@@JWalters388if you've seen Tate's interviews, rarely does he get angry in such a way to "spill the beans". BBC just thought they were morally Superior, so they didn't put any effort
@@missinterpretation4984 I'll ask you the same question I asked miss behave?? how's Mr Interpretation?? (except he was Mr Behave).
Very balanced and objective evaluation. Good job Spidey!
Spidey, I want to commend you for being able to conduct yourself as the professional that you are & as always appreciate your input. Your videos are always interesting and respectful. Though I am not nearly as good as you are at removing my personal feelings from situation. Sooo, since my parents always stated that if you haven't anything nice to say...I will leave it at that. Good job Spivey! 👏 👏👏👏
That wasn’t an interview, that was a sound bite quest
Hahahahahahahahah. So good
This was so interesting. I followed your suggestion & watched the full interview in preparation for the analysis & had the most unexpected outcome; I came away ALMOST in favour of Andrew Tate. Certainly more so than I did the interviewer! I think the interview was incredibly poorly done; it was like they chose the person on the team who hated him the most & it could never be an unbiased interview. She seemed completely unable to move from any point she was making & react to things being said; she had an agenda & she was sticking to it.
I cannot claim to be a professional interviewer by any stretch however I do work on a 121 basis with people daily & being able to extract information from people & communicate at all different levels according to the situation is part of what I do. Had I been sat 121 with Andrew Tate, off the top of my head I would have done 2 main things differently:
-most importantly, knowing the type of person he is (thinking mainly of his ego), I would have approached the interaction with a friendliness, almost flattery, & openness to suspend my personal feelings in order to encourage him to explain things rather than put him on the defensive.
-I would have had a bullet point list of evidence for the points I am making, with reference numbers for the relevant clips in a folder so I could pull them up if needed!
I agree with everything in this comment! It’s not even about liking or disliking Andrew Tate, it’s about the BBC asking him for an interview and then doing this! If you don’t like the guy and can’t hide that; don’t interview him
@@TheBehavioralArts exactly! Thank you so much for responding to my comment, I never expect a response (as you get so many comments, & commenting on TH-cam threads in general often feels very much like throwing a needle into a haystack) & am always over the moon when I see you have responded!
I was wondering, have you considered covering the recent Philip Schofield interview at all? It’s big news in the UK at the moment & I’ve been looking for an analysis having watched the interview; I found one but it was very simplistic & also talked about which direction his eyes were pointing & what that meant etc which really turned me off! I found myself wishing it was one of your videos!
@@TheBehavioralArtsI don’t like AT. I’m happy that he got confronted and put in his place.
@@nieveswhite3859 he didn’t. If you go to the BBC’s video it’s entirely comments in his favor. If you don’t like him you should want a more competent interviewer who could have actually called him out effectively with evidence
@@nieveswhite3859 he did not get put in his place. He came out on top because she couldn’t back a single thing she said up
I find your analysis videos very useful, and I appreciate your attitude. It's become rare. Thanks for sharing ;)
I want to take clips of YOU Spidey. Your method of speaking is incredible. I was so impressed with how you discussed Tate but, even when you mentioned membership. You are a very kind and classy person. We need more people like you in the world.
A very in-depth, articulate, and intelligent analysis of this interview. I love how human beings can tell you just as much while speaking as they can with their mouths closed. It’s a real science and very interesting. Thank you for this video and your analysis. 🙏
You succeeded brilliantly in an unbiased analysis. A very rare quality these days.
I think the BBC should have sent a man..because knowing what he has said in the past, he would have considered them more an "equal" and possibly opened up more. Her dislike of him showed through completely
I thought the same at first, but then again, I think it could have worked with a woman who was willing to play a role. Because the problem is that he felt confronted, and particularly by a woman, and so he just went into deny-and-obfuscate mode. If a man had come into the interview the same way as she did, it would have probably been about the same, cause he would be on some "What color is YOUR Bugatti" BS. It would be a pissing contest.
The one thing men with big egos love is to talk about themselves, no matter who is listening. It would not be in his nature to shut up even in the presence of a woman. The interviewer seems to me to be a woman who, perhaps, does not read subjects well and maybe rebels against the idea of coaxing answers in that way, preferring to be "no-nonsense" and asking the hard questions.
He's dislikable.
@@ileanahernandez1709 Immensely...
Hahaha the BBC sent that little dweep to his house a week earlier.. Then Andrew destroyed him too
A woman inclined to use diplomacy could have done it smh he can't even help himself. Grandiosity is what he does he only tried to turn down the volume.
The second, he leaned forward to intimidate her, in his own home she should have taken the advantage, confidently.
Ugh it must be how, football fans feel watching an easy pass, get dropped.
Maaaaaann it's GOT to be hard to stay unbiased on this one
Unless you know him personally, it shouldnt.
@@FiryaFYI I don't understand your comment. Know who, Spidey or Tate?
@@kristinepierce7447 tate.
@@FiryaFYI Idk, I don't know him and my BP rises a bit every time I see his clips. I think he's the type of person that everyone has a strong bias for one way or the other.
Hey just a small note on the "shaking legs" that can be interesting; you can make your legs shake like that when you position your foot in a certain way and lean on it, right? and personally I sometimes do that because it's a soothing, funny sensation. So maybe it's stress in this case but idk, I also do that when I'm just comfortable :)
Candace Owens did a much better interview with Tate. She did play that clip of the "Lover boy method". He acknowledged it. Owens was much more complimentary, and she seems like she actually likes Tate, but she got much more out of him. He still sounded very rehursed, and repeated the same thing several times, but that was a much better interview.
Fabulous job as always, Spidey.
Judgmental, condescending interviewers rarely achieve more than riling up viewers already backing their position, in my experience. It’s maddening to watch 😳💐
The interview is exactly what the BBC wanted and why this reporter was chosen to give it. They wanted more fireworks but it is controversial enough to do the job.
@@Eclecticperspective1 Makes sense. Still maddening to me 🤯 but makes sense 😂💐
19:08 RECEIPTS!! Always bring receipts!!
Spidey, when referencing the shaking leg at 25:24, there is a cluster actions to account for in his behavior. While he is saying "that's fine" there is a jaw thrust, lip grooming, lip retraction, expression of contempt, another jaw thrust, and lip grooming again with lip retraction. He is also adapting with his ring finger while his hands steeple downward and presents at least two leftward head shrugs while his gaze reverts down and away and his head drops slightly before he lifts his head again smiling and attempting to recover. These are not what I expect to see if he really feels in control at this moment. I don't know if he is more concerned with controlling himself, the interview, or the entirety of the situation.
He wants to control the interviewer so he can brag about it for the next 100 years and it reinforces how useless women are for anything other than his playthings or money makers.
It takes a lot for a human to put up with people who judge prematurely .. like what that woman did.
People try to glean too much from body language. Certainly there are psychological drivers that dictate how people move and speak. However you can never see those drivers directly, you can only intuit them based off of the body language downstream of it. Even with clusters of body language, there can be multiple interpretations and inferences made as to what caused that cluster to appear, and in the end they are only inferences. Nobody is a mind reader, or else the top poker players would always be able to tell when their opponents were bluffing.
I appreciate body language analysis, but I wouldn't put all your emphasis and confidence in that one single tool. There are many other things at work which you cannot see, and you cannot glean them all from a person's body language.
Looking good Spidey!! ❤ And wonderful analysis as always! You’re so refreshing in comparison to almost everything else on the internet these days! I admire you so much! You are amazing at what you do and the wonderful person that you are shines through as well. You can’t help but be drawn to you! I love that you’re not hostile either way and that you understand things are not just black and white. People these days seem to have the attitude that if you are not for what they are that you’re obviously on the other end against them and it’s just not the case.
Hi Spidey, I love all of your various analysis. I wondered if you would be able to analyse the BBC interview with Philip Schofield. I know it's very UK centric but it's been big news this side of the pond.
Hey Spidey your new hairline looks sooooo good on you!!!🙂👍 I really enjoyed this body language analysis
It's entirely true that if she had done a more effective job interviewing, the interview likely would have gone far better, but that wouldn't have been the interview that the BBC wanted to air. They didn't want to air their reporter casually interacting, building rapport, and _then_ hitting Andrew Tate with hard questions when he least expected, _and_ having the receipts if he tried to evade the questions (which, as you pointed out, this woman was sorely unprepared on).
They wanted a bunch of people with 45-second attention spans to see that Andrew Tate is a vile piece of shit (as you can clearly see, from the way the interviewer interacts with him from the very beginning, that she detests him) and to hear him deny the allegations (they already believe he's guilty, they just wanted to hear him deny it, so that they can write the denial off as a lie). And then they tune out. That's the narrative that the BBC wanted.
Just thank you for creating a positive community on the internet. So often it’s filled with people who want to badger and belittle. It’s nice that there are a few places like this online.
At 31:00 he simply explained his past life and what the woman did of her own free will to extract more money from men. He never said he made her do it or told her to do it that way. He simply explained her method from observation. However you did a great job on this interview
Hey. Thanks for watching. I would encourage you to watch that segment again. He starts by saying they worked for him, then says when they were sleeping “I had staff” on their WhatsApp pretending to be them, then he said “we were bringing in money from the sky” (we implies involvement) and at the end he takes credit for putting this operation together. I’m not sure how anyone can miss that this whole concept was his idea and he profited from it. It wasn’t her method, it was his method, he takes credit for it.
I just watched a video by another body language "specialist" Enigma, as a complete novice in this field I am instantly regretting wasting my time watching that video when this video was available.
I'm sure Enigma is accomplished in his own right but this video is so much clearer and packed with much more information and insight.
Yeah, not to be mean but it’s hard to compare either two. Enigma is a smart kid who read a couple of books and does a good job explaining certain things. Spidey teaches this to companies, university classes and he’s one of the best mentalists in the world so he applies this on stage and huge tv shows. It’s more than knowledge and education it’s hard experience.
He is basically a pimp. And you are spot on that this interviewer was totally unprepared and has actually done a disservice to women as a result.
@@JMBBrasil his words
Maybe but it seems that the women involved are getting involved with him willingly. He isn't keeping them chained in his basement lol they're free to go.
@@JMBBrasil He ran a camming company and took most of his sex workers' incomes. Pimping doesn't just apply to full-service sex work.
A pimp....really? You can dislike someone for many reasons but to get others to dislike that person, people distort reality, believe whatever they hear, and become sheep following the most radical leader.
@@kristajones7202 its not illegal to pimp?
This is not the first time BBC messed up big time. They also messed up with the Elon Musk interview. I have no idea why they are so uninformed regarding their subjects. It's really mind boggling she went there without at least one piece of counter evidence.
It seems like this interviewer went in with all her feelings and preconceived perceptions of him and caused this interview to go from 0-60 in 30 seconds. Interviewers, in my opinion, have to have the ability AND responsibility of setting the tone for any interview they conduct. Like you said, had she started off with friendly greetings and curious open- ended questions, she (and we) would've gotten more out of him because there would have been some level of trust and confidence built with him. Her approach will only give him more fuel to "prove his [mysoginistic] point/s".
Not to mention journalists are supposed to be unbiased 😳
@@klaj6595 Even psychologists and psychiatrists are biased nowadays. People like the video maker have become extremely rare
@@12gauge599 And that's why u don't have news. You have propaganda. Who ever own media that person decide about propaganda.
@@12gauge599 he’s the best. It blows my mind sometimes how he can ignore his own opinions and even devalue his own opinions sometimes and just talk behavior
And imagine how much more effective it would’ve been if they were having a fairly pleasant conversation and then, still being polite and staying calm, she’d asked a question he didn’t like. The way she went about it now anyone can just say “well she was rude and clearly hates him so why would he even want to be nice or talk to her at all” (I don’t agree with that personally, but can easily see others thinking that). A missed opportunity for sure.
Journalism is not the same anymore , she’s an activist just like the rest of the establishment. Good video man
36:02 I think he was laughing at the audacity of her trying to force an appology from him. "You come to my house and hostily ask me questions, don't even bring evidience, and think I'm going to apologize." Baiscally, "you attack me and expect me to be apologize?" I don't think he was lauging at the idea of an apology in general. I actually think it was a big act of him to suggest he should be more careful - implying he has not been perfect. I surely wouldn't elicit any sort of concessions to someone who had been that hostile to me in an interview.
I think its key to talk calmly about Mr. Tate. He is exceptional at exciting and bringing emotional reaction to situations. When the chaos erupts and he remains calm because he planned for said chaos to erupt he is viewed as tactical or prepared when really anyone who walked into a situation with a plan to cause chaos will always be more calm than the people who were not prepared for that interaction.
I believe Mr. Tate has made clear his intentions are for wealth, control, and exposure and this is also what he preaches to his followers. I think the key thing to remember here is anyone who preaches to lie always will not refrain from lying to those they preach to. Mr. Tate preaches wealth, control, and exposure so it makes common sense that he would be using his audience to achieve it just as he tells his audience to use people and situations in their life to achieve the same.
I think Mr. Tate, just like any person, should be viewed with discernment and careful critical thought. Everyone has valid points because everyone has real experiences, but it is each of our own jobs to deal with those things ourselves and with our support system. Mr. Tate feeds off sharing his view in a light that can cause negative interactions between loved ones, strangers, and friends. When Mr. Tate is talking about manipulating people you can't only believe he is manipulating the people that don't agree with him. It is far more likely he is manipulating most of the people he reaches. This is due to the context of manipulation being portrayed as positive in Mr. Tates representation of it.
Take every person who claims to have the answers to your struggles with a large grain of salt. Most truly helpful advice is not a quick fix or something that requires you to manipulate people. It is often introspective and takes time to grow. Wealth is only as meaningful as what you use that money to do, control is only as valuable as how you manage your self, and exposure is only as good as the council and morals you keep and the message you share.
Weew
👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
Well said
@@Wanderer5891 Thank you! Tried to stay impartial, appreciate the response!
One of the best comments here 👍
I'm not a fan of his either but this doesn't sound like an interview...it sounds like an interrogation. She sounds like she's already decided he's guilty. Even if he is or isn't she has no objectivity.
I'm not a fan of hos either 😂
@@TheBoogerJames Oops...spell check...
Even interrogations aren’t that confrontational and judgmental.
@@TheBehavioralArts But maybe it's the way the questions are asked and the tone that is used that makes a person feel otherwise.
Did anyone else have a smile/smirk on their face when Spidey was getting triggered and had to take some deep breaths to calm himself back down??? No, just me??? Lol
Wow...Thanks, Spidey, for covering this!
I love how unbiased you are as you’re analyzing.
She doesn't seem like a very objective journalist. She obviously dislikes him and comes off hostile from the get-go. I'm not familiar with her, but I'd think the BBC could've sent someone who could be more objective. That being said, my only exposure to Tate has been THIS video, and he DOES seem like a real piece of work.
One of my coworkers said "Oh this person did xyz" That means their lying!" I said "Not necessarily. Did you establish their baseline? Was there a cluster?" The coworker had no idea whatsoever I meant by "baseline" and "cluste." I referred her to your videos.
Haha great job! I understand the frustration that statements like that cause 😊
@Shavon X I was reluctant to recommend them as their energy is quite strong. Spidey's energy is strong, but suptle. It's not as "in your face. She's easily overwhelmed.
@@SousiQ I think Spidey is the best behavioral analyst on TH-cam. I think because his experience reading people is in the real world and not exclusively interrogation rooms he brings a very real and relatable element to this.
@Thomas Rios Exactly. He speaks with respect, not talking down to you or over your head. He really truly wants to teach us what to look for and don't just assume because you saw one twitch.
@@SousiQ yep. He doesn’t talk about it on the channel but he teaches mentalists/magicians how to use behavioral analysis to improve their performances and he has award winning products on the market for it. He’s a legend amongst magicians for his cold reading skills.
Spidey, thank you for this invaluable analysis. Your insight and suggestions help me grow both professionally and personally.
My pleasure Mary 😊
I love this channel! You really make me more aware of my own speech, surroundings, statements, questions, answers, movements, actions/reactions and thank you so much for that
Not a 100% accurate but one of the BEST analyses i've seen on this interview very very nice job!!!
The BBC aren’t doing well with interviews.
Another very interesting and insightful video Spidey. It's really disappointing to see such an important interview, given that it is the first after his release from prison, end up being such a mess and like the title says- a total trainwreck! Especially considering how you've managed to do your own research and found the very evidence that she was presenting that she didn't even have with her! Also the hair looks fire btw, you might want to give the number of whoever you used to Andrew XD
When he says I should be more cautious about the things I am saying what he really means is I should stop telling people about the crimes I'm committing and just get on with committing them
Exactly!
I was waiting for this😍 thanks
Spidy! We need you to do this interview 🙏
Do you think they sent a woman on purpose?
Yes.
Of course they did.
Nah he was supposed to be interviewed by Matt Shea but he trolled him and just stood him up.
Yes, if you look at the articles written by the BBC about Tate, almost all of them are by women. Presumably women are better at understanding a man who talks primarily to men about issues facing men.
@@mark-147 He makes himself out as an expert on women-so I guess everyone is out of their element.
I was hoping you’d cover this! I’m very interested in your take about to watch the video
I didn't know who Andrew Tate was until you encouraged us to preview his interview with the BBC. Great analysis (as always 🙂)! Is there any "allowance" or "handicap" given to the analysis when there is a clear psychological disorder like Narcissistic Personality Disorder? I'm not a psychologist, however he does exhibit the symptoms of the disorder and his reaction to criticism is spot on with it as well.
A lot of conditions can affect someone’s behavior. We just consider it in the baseline. With Tate for example, resume statements, 1 st person pronouns, and quick denials are part of his baseline. Could it be NPD; sure, do I specifically care why it’s happening? Not really, I just note that it is.
@@TheBehavioralArtsHey Spidey! When it comes to the baseline, are there ways to identify when someone is deviating from it from deception vs when they might deviate from it because they sense they aren’t convincing their interviewer/audience with their responses? Would this be amplified or muddied when analyzing people who are entertainers, since they would be wired to avoid giving stale or repetitive answers to keep their audience engaged?
Wow I hadn't expected this! The way she opened was awful! I always hate it when people say my name and follow it with a definitive statement. It always puts me on the defensive immediately. What a terrible setup to make someone open up! And she managed to make the rest of the interview sound even more like an interrogation! I would have expected better from a professional. She was so openly hostile, I was constantly reminded of Judith (Alan's ex in Two and a half Men)!
Overall, I think you made a couple of good points. I'm impressed at your valiant effort to keep this a balanced and fair analysis, despite your own opinions. I have no doubt that this interview would have been much more interesting and constructive if you had conducted it. Too bad they sent this Karen instead...
I agree!💯
In my opinion, it doesn't matter if you like Andrew Tate or not, this "reporter" was immediately hostile, unprofessional, unprepared and was an embarrassment to the BBC.
I have watched all of Bruce Rivers videos on Andrew Tate. He's a brilliant lawyer and I wish more people would see the real info out there to be fully informed. Your content is amazing!!! Thank you :)
Ya.. he is awesome 😎
Same here, he is awesome and one of three lawyers I follow on lawtube. He does a great walk-through of the case against AT, even if he doesn't fully understand how the legal system works in countries that is members of the European Union.
@@AlexaOnWheels yes!! 😊🙌🙌
This really shows how important it is with the right person doing an interview. The fact that they didnt pick one shows how poorly prepared this was. There are SO MUCH material on Tate to build an interview with.
Spidey, Tate has a video he did himself after this interview, something to do another video on Tate? Would be really interesting to see you expand on a "How to" on interviewing someone like Tate!
What I takeaway from both Elon Musk especially and also somewhat Andrew Tate, they are both more intelligent than the interviewers. The interviewers think they are the smartest person in the room, but they so are not. And the beauty of Elon is he is neuroatypical and he has the typical innocent quality of autistic spectrum people. At the same time he is a very talented and brilliant businessman and inventive thinker.
Both BBC interviewers are highly stressed and touch themselves constantly. I have to wonder what the management at Abby is like.
19:20 exactly this! She probably dismissed the idea of bringing receipts, thinking it not necessary, as she is already convinced the whole world condemns Andrew Tate along with her.
I believe that admitting we've fallen short (admitting we're wrong) in anything takes a massive amount of vulnerability. It is easier to be vulnerable in a space which feels safe and grounded. Perhaps we could've seen a reflective attitude in Mr. Tate if this atmosphere had been created.
To me: Safe does not mean everyone agrees with you. It means that those in that space believe you are a human with humanity. That you are trying to do the best you can with what you have, even if that best falls short. Then everyone in a space can approach as equals and not feel misunderstood before they reach the discussions that matter.
Outside of such a space, individuals who believe they are good (like Andrew Tate) will be arguing for their self-worth as a human being, rather than the heart of hurt which has arisen from whats been said and done.
Hope this made sense and brought value to the discussion.
U gave an amazing break down I like your balanced take u made me a subscriber sir 👏 I also think Tate would have no problem apologizing for some thangs said but not by her rude apology demands
Really liked the analysis, Spidey should be giving classes to journalists.
"I'm a genius" sounds so damn familiar 🤔🤔🙄 30:33
“Dangling beautiful women in front of unconfident men”. See, Spidey, these men have such an inflated sense of self worth that they think these gorgeous women are in love with them. These are men with ego issues of THAT nature. It’s always shocking to me the amount older, uglier, not at lot going for them, men who think they deserved a beautiful young woman. What is that?
Competitiveness, - and low self worth/lack of individualistic identity - between men and how their rankings reflect upon, those who are considered or consider themselves, 'the least'.
They're playing a game with each other, using women as things along with other, Actual things and some get bitter about how these material things, or lack thereof, bespeak them.
@@8thhousemoonrabbit205
The reason dangling beatiful women in front of unconfident men is such a common and effective thing is because it is MUCH harder for a man to get experience (and thus confidence) in having a relationship or even just interacting well with the opposite gender. It is not because these men consider themselves ''worth of being with a beautiful women'' but because they are unconfident due to lacking that valuable experience. In contrast it is really easy for a woman to get that experience, because in our current modern societies women have FAR more social value.
Completely ignoring most people of the other gender and believing they only deserve the very top % is more a thing women do then, as well. Women have a lot (as several times as much) more options then men do. That is simply the reality of the gender dynamic when it comes to relationships or social interaction.
It is simple -
Men prefer youth and beauty in women.
Women prefer men with resources (money/power).
That's how it's always been
@@Tiasung women have an abundance, of unwanted focus and projections that are mirages, facades, death traps and pits of despair, made flesh.
Makes my mouth dry, to briefly contemplate the Bullets, grenades, land mines and shrapnel bombs, I've avoided and may I remain, thusly blessed🖤.
People need to gather their particulars and get some self love ... SELF love
So you want to criticise men who are tricked by beautiful women, but sympathise with women who are tricked by successful men? Misandry much?
Dude…seriously I’m 4 minutes in and have to correct you. His smile is the kind that jocks use to intimidate with over confidence to hide their fear. 40 years of martial arts training and fighting taught me that. Totally disagree with you on this.
Agreed, I would have called that smile gloating.
You have real life knowledge. It’s an asset in this situation. I think you’re 100% right
@@sondra4789 all of his "strategies" are like Cliff notes version of BOOK OF FIVE RINGS with some ART OF WAR while using elementary Holocaust Denier techniques and reframing Pickup artist speech. Very easy to see through. Inside he is a little boy that masquerades as macho. His face is nothing but a mask which is why he usually hides behind sunglasses. His prime directive is intimidation and gets easily frustrated with a minor threat. Classic bully.
I didn’t know this thank you
Bot
The best commentary on Andrew Tate Iv seen. Fair and balanced. Suspect your political views are more to the left. Why can’t most lefties reason and explain their position like this. I’m sure both sides would find a lot more middle ground .
That's why independent media ,away from Fox , CNN , ETC , is the way.
I'm trying not to dislike Andrew Tate but I keep coming across videos of him saying mean things about women. Not every woman is the same.
Nope.Some have beards and d*cks and were once above average athletes and now are winners...
Only thing that really made me like him was when I found out he built an animal shelter in Romania. I've adopted like 10 dogs from animal shelters so i can relate.
@@fernandocontreras1577 omg you like him because of that?
Hey, what's good for the goose is good for the gander. There are plenty of women out there, on line, that speak the same or worse about men.
He attracts women like that because they’ll take his abuse for money and bling. They have daddy issues, he has mommy issues, they’re the only women who wouldn’t see him from a mile away and RUN! I can’t even stand him. He’s a POS in my opinion. He’s said enough, he needs to just go away.
Spidey you are so unbiased. You cover all the topics that are interesting. I so value your analysis and opinion. I use your ..... Not sure the right words... Tools in my daily life. Keep on keeping on man. You're doing good in this world!
He flat out lied about putting on his website where he sold his 'Hustlers University' course, that his method is to get girls to fall in love with him, get them over to Romania, then get them to do camera sex work for him. This is the 'business method' he was selling his paid up members, and forms part of his trafficking strategy. Tate took it down, but it's still out there. That's just one aspect of how he exploited those women. He also admitted on his site to pretending he was paying tax for them, but really keeping the money. He's a lying, cheating, exploitative scumbag, currently under house arrest, lying in an interview is nothing to him.
It's not illegal to do that 😂
hater , did he shutdown "University" ?, because it's payments and so many things shutdown by government, and he approached ladies who in the "field of sex work/ok girls " and train them to be worker like every sexual industry and paid them 25-75% of all income (in any other field of work nobody will give you 1-3% max in almost every field ,and he didn't put gun in her head and give command to do things ) so don't be a jealous fool and say anything, as any corporate " manipulation" , he also manipulate people and it's true , doesn't mean he is the worst kind of people
@@terencedorsey6717 it might b, he was just in jail. But there r things that r immoral but legal so that falls under "mores". Dont participate in the acts u can speak out against them but that's about it in a free society
And BBC never lies or misleads? They never exploit people for their gain?
Your lying.
Hey Spidey can you put chapters in your videos so if we want we can skip the part where you present yourself and make disclaimers? I've been following you for about a couple of years so I know who you are and your good intentions. It's always interesting to watch your videos, thank you for the work you put here mate! 😃
There are chapters. 3:00 is timestamped. But I mean you can move the time forward until you see a clip of the subject
i have been WAITING for this analysis
First, she came at him with guns blazing, which took me by surprise, and that set the mood from the start. It would have been a great interview if she had done her homework.
Maybe they could have had someone else do the interview because it's obvious she can't stand being in the same room with him.
Why lately so many interviewers just fail that their job? Especially when they know that it will be televised!?! Your breakdowns Spidey are as always incredible! Wish you would start doing interviews :) x
It wasn't jail time, he's a scamming azzhole who puffs up and tries to control of every...like bioches, money and scamming people. He cares less bout screwing this over. Dude is scammy hustler with a website.
ask this man to do an interview with andrew tate with proofs like he said and watch this guy get smashed by tate just like everyone else ever did😂😂
Character or not, it’s definitely not the kind of character to have kids look up to in my personal opinion. You can be a strong, dominant male who shows kindness and respect to others.
That’s true manhood. He’s technically a parasite and a nasty one
Have you ever watched a full interview off him (no hate, honest question)?
@@Don-po8vl I have. I still don’t think it’s a good look to have for kids.
@@danielschmaderer okay fair enough.
@@Don-po8vl i appreciate what you were getting at. I know some people can say they don’t like someone or something and have no knowledge of that person or thing in general.
Very good video, man. I love it. Good job! :) Very balanced.
Been waiting for your take on this, bro. Thank you.