To those asking "Why don't you just use the line input of your sound card?" -- Like many newer PCs and Macs, the laptop I used in the video does not have a line input. The only audio input it has is the mono microphone terminal of its headset jack, which is not software-definable to work as anything else. So if your computer has a line input, that's great! But this product is for those who don't.
@Jackie Bereham "They sound better than the original albums now." That's really a subjective opinion. I've been using the same Thorens turntable for 25 years and I'm very used to the way it sounds. There's nothing I would rather listen to more.
My laptop, an ACER Aspire 3, has one jack for all. When I plug anything into it, it asks what I just plugged in. Options are line in, line out, mic in, headphones, headset, or speaker out. Obviously, I can only plug in one device at a time. There are three USB ports, an HDMI, as well as Bluetooth radio.
They certainly took some liberty in advertising the product's compatibility. There's no way it can safely interface, say, to a 4 dBu analogue source ("guitars, keyboards, synthesizers..." they say). Even my humble Revox tapedeck, with Dolby level set at precisely 0 dBu, can easily produce +10 dBu (8 V p-p) undistorted output from decent cassettes. This kind of level needs a hardware resistive pad (at the very least), not software adjustments.
I've seen some scam HDMI to VGA adapters that are for oddball TV sets that use the HDMI as a multi-in port in software, but people buy them not knowing that and then wonder why it doesn't work. same with some of the HDMI to composite cables i've seen.
Doesn't surprise me that they're using that design, DACs can be small enough to fit in a standard USB connector these days. In fact, the wired earbuds included with the iPhone, have a DAC in the tiny Lightning connector
Yes, the DAC chip will easily fit into the USB plug footprint, and even a lot of flash memory devices fit the entire flash chip and controller into the actual plug itself, with noting but the contacts as hard gold plate on the other side, and the shell wrapped around it. Your Apple lightning connector has integrated into it a pair of control and interface chips inside the connector already, to provide identification as to the cable serial number (thus the clones that get bricked every IOS upgrade) and the actual capabilities of the cable as to the functions it supports, from plain charging in various flavours to being able to handle audio and display, plus also to have USB capability.
@@timotheatae You're correct about USB-C having an analog output (Audio Adapter Accessory Mode), but Lightning does not have such a feature. There's a teardown of the EarPods that reveals a DAC inside the Lightning connector. appleinsider.com/articles/16/09/20/teardown-finds-dac-chips-in-apples-lightning-earpods-lightning-to-35mm-adapter-for-iphone-7
@@timotheatae Apple was chasing size reduction above all else with Lightning. Their 30-pin connector provided many such analogue signals, including composite video. With Lightning it was deemed these functions were more obscure and took up unnecessary space. Remember, the iPhone didn’t get rid of the headphone jack until a while after adopting Lightning. As far as they were concerned, to include such a feature would be a waste of circuit traces and connector pins. The iPod dock market wasn’t as hot anymore either, and they were the primary reason for including those signals in the 30-pin connector. So it’s not really that surprising they had to add an extra chip when they did kill the headphone jack. Also, the Pixel phones’ USB-C headphone dongle is in fact a class-compliant USB audio device, and the adaptors that tap into those audio pins purportedly don’t work on the Pixel phones. I wouldn’t be surprised if most other manufacturers do it that other way though, they can reuse the DAC in the phone and the adaptor itself is cheaper.
@@WillOnSomething not even all USB-C adapters are using the audio adapter mode, the new ones are all with a DAC inside like the Lightning ones (Apple even makes one for their iPads)
Why is it crazy? A cheap cable with a cheap generic but standard (these things have been tiny for a LONG time) that takes less than a dollar to make is crazy? Therere better ones than this for like 10 bucks anyway.
As a side note, if you've always wanted to know what a level of 51 *really* means, right-click the field and it'll let you select a display in dB. The mapping can be... _interesting._
There are weird USB cables like that, with a USB plug on one side and something else on the other end: audio jacks, phone plugs, firewire, rj45, ps2, db9, you name them. But they're just cables, designed for special purposes, and using them to connect stuff that isn't supposed to be connected together can be dangerous for the equipment. So it's good to be careful, but it shouldn't be a surprise nowadays. Think about this: bluetooth earbuds have a full computer in them, complete with radio circuitry and antenna, dac, adc, speaker, several mic, a battery, and they're smaller than that connector...
0:24 Techmoan: "We're up all night to get lucky, we're up all night to get lucky" (36 seconds into this video th-cam.com/video/cIXOH1tJJu4/w-d-xo.html)
here's the full tune: th-cam.com/video/gdh6W27OR8M/w-d-xo.html and the original video that the thing come from: th-cam.com/video/5ks3ucumilU/w-d-xo.html
To be honest, I'm surprised that you're surprised. Some of the dongles are rediculously tiny if you take out the actual jacks. Don't forget, you can get 512+ gigabyte "micro" flash drives (think Logitech unifying receiver but it's a storage device... Tiny). Besides... Everyone uses ADCs and DACs smaller than this in their phones and (apparently) don't even know it.
This is totally unrelated but I really like your presentation style in all your videos. It has a nice "vintage TH-cam" feel but with way higher production value. Also your speaking voice is extremely clear and well paced.
Huh, a product of reasonable value that works well and does what it says? Don’t see that often anymore! ADCs can be made tiny these days, though it’s definitely no less impressive to see that in practice!
All the Van Halen albums through 1984 has Eddie's guitar predominantly coming through the left channel (except during solos that are mixed center), with just some echo/reverb of the guitar coming through the right channel. This may help identify left audio from right audio on the unlabeled adapter.
@@lauridsd Or just plug it in, start recording, and switch it around if it was wrong and then mark it. Or select invert channels in audacity if youre lazy
It’s not impressive compared to the same thing inside a much, much, much smaller plug, which is exactly what Apple does in its Lightning EarPods and Lightning to headphone adapter.
@@jamesslick4790 Yeah it does. It's literally the same thing. Smartphones are just handheld PCs. A DAC is a DAC. Building a DAC into a connector is building a DAC into a connector, and the smartphones have smaller connectors so it is more impressive.
@@jamesslick4790 Of course it does, since the commenter found it “impressive” that they’d shrunk down the technology to fit in the plug. It’s literally the _exact same thing._ Headphones are analog audio devices, and a USB output used for digital audio is the same whether it’s connected to a PC or a phone. (Lightning audio output uses USB internally.)
@@tookitogo The APPLE device is LESS impressive as it adds an unnecessary layer, just to remain proprietary. But fanbois be fanbois I guess. This device is "agnostic" as to brand of input or output device or OS, and The OP was impressed that the thing has LESS bulk than the USUAL analog to USB devices. AND NO ONE IS HOOKING UP A Cassette deck to a PC with an iPhone.
The A/D converter chip is very common in many devices There was a device called iMic that accepted Line level or headphone level input and it had a USB plug and was plug-and-play I used them to feed the discriminator output from my Motorola 2-way radios to give ATCS-Monitor the live data from the radios Because you have multiple radios each needing a sound card line level input, the iMic was needed or you needed to add extra sound cards. I will definitely pick up some of these cables
I'm pleasantly surprised by its quality. It seems it tells Windows that it's a USB microphone, which I guess makes sense from an ease-of-implementation viewpoint. Sure, mucking about with the Windows input levels as you switch from source to source is a bit of an annoyance, but other than that, it does the job quite well.
That’s actually a pretty decent little ADC. Far less noisy than the built-in input on the computer, and lots don’t even have a separate one anymore, just a mic pin in the headphone jack. Plus the form factor makes it convenient and basically idiot-proof. The extra little adaptors make the user experience seem pretty pleasant. Not bad for under $20. It probably makes transfers that sound as good as the device they’re played on for most customers, unlike a built-in input. Now, let’s hope they’re saving as FLAC or WAV, or they might feel their originals still had a little something extra to them.
It's mostly laptops that don't have all those audio connectors. Even so, my Acer Nitro 5 supports line input as an option when you use the combo jack. Desktop computers that aren't cheap garbage also generally have different audio inputs. Even my 2009 desktop has 7.1 audio support and at 192 KHz 24 bit.
@@fungo6631 Plenty of integrated inputs claim those high rates but there's tests you can do to show they basically just increase the harmonic interference. You'll want to put it on 48kHz to actually get the best out of it. And, even with all that being said, the most premium integrated input is still going to be noisier than a proper dedicated conversion device. Now, you may not notice it personally, in which case go wild on your own personal transfers. You're not going to be layering them on top each other like people do in audio production, which is why they care so much about low noise.
@@kaitlyn__L This was a fairly high end LGA 775 mobo, and the S/N ratio was advertised as 117 dB. MSI P45-C51 is the mobo. It has mic and line input alongside the 7.1 output. Separate connectors, instead of sacrificing the mic and line inputs.
@@fungo6631 I understand. It’s from 2009, it obviously doesn’t have the single integrated port. Like I said, if you’re satisfied with your integrated sound, that’s just fine. Nevertheless, there is only so much you can do on a motherboard when it comes to large trace gaps, only so many filtering caps you can fit, only so-clean of a power source when it’s being shared with the rest of the system. Dedicated interfaces will sound better for the same price as the premium for motherboard audio. And if you’re using the front panel connectors instead of the back, those tiny wires are also incredibly noisy. I was a firm believer in premium integrated audio chips for years. I convinced myself buying a separate device was pointless. Until I actually had to buy one for an XLR input, and everything else sounded much better through it as well. Again, I don’t want to make you feel bad about your current setup, or to convince you that you need to go out and spend a ton of money. What you have right now is fine for you. But whenever you’re going to be upgrading your audio setup anyway, consider buying an external interface. One of my friends hated integrated audio but kept buying PCIe sound cards. And later, a Schitt audio interface for half the price sounded much better than her sound cards, and she was all like “why didn’t I do this sooner?”. (When she used the front panel connectors her headphone output was getting crosstalk into her microphone input, and the Schitt unit alleviated that too by having the output on her desk. No more choosing between crosstalk and reaching round the back.)
I assume its set up as a "Microphone Array" since it has two left and right channels, then it's just sensible that it sets itself up with two channels.
This is a great video! I have wondered about the lack of a line input on computers these days, and you seem to have found a really good solution! It sounded just fine to me over TH-cam. I think this solves a lot of problems, and it is great that it has no hum or noise. And on top of that, to discover a NEW audio processing software -- well, that makes your video golden to me (yes I like and use Audacity, but who can resist a different sound editor to add to my collection?) So thanks for the very useful video and again, your usual thoroughness and clarity. Love your channel!
I bought one of these on your recommendation a little over two years ago, and haven't used it yet. I know, I know...why'd ya buy it? Because if it fills a need, I know I will have ONE DAY when I get the time to digitize some of my hundreds of unique cassette recordings. Hopefully, the deck won't have dry rotted belts or something like that, and I won't croak before I get around to it. It's amazing how fully I found ways to occupy my time since retirement. If only I could figure out how to stop wasting time on sleep.
So glad to see John Laduca's Mr. Fantastic album at second one! Many people will find it very weird reading this enthusiastic comment over some elevator/Muzak music but, yes, you made me love this by playing it several times over the years on a few videos.
Nice one. Two obvious use cases (at least for my purposes): - transferring WAV rips of retrocomputer tapes onto real cassette tape - running said rips directly off a laptop into a vintage computer with a 3.5mm input for tape programs (I'm looking at you, Sinclair)
thats the first thing i thought about, old software on tape (there is tons of this already backed up on the interwebs too), make it easy to plug into old computers with modern pc. I did not think about preservation of these old tapes with this device tho, probably would work well if its really low noise.
It looks like a lot of audio equipment uses a 3/4” spacing but it’s sort of a de-facto standard rather than anything formalized, as far as I can tell. A bunch of stuff out there uses a different spacing, often specifically to break compatibility. There’s probably some circuit layout reason why so many manufacturers just happen to do 3/4” RCA plug spacing.
It's not a circuit layout reason. Circuit boards are often laid 90 degrees from the connectors, so the easiest thing for manufacturers to do is to buy a combo jack, ie one piece of plastic with both left and right jacks. So they both save on board space and manufacturing time.
@@xureality well yeah having a single integrated stereo pair obviously makes the most sense, but the fact that it's all using the same spacing is the de-facto thing which I thought might have a circuit layout reason behind it (like something to do with standard trace/perfboard/etc. spacing or something).
I just connected my turntable, open reel deck, 6 track player and cassette deck to an old Radio Shack mixer and plugged it into my line-in jack. Have copied over 400 albums and all sound great
I was having such a difficult time with my brand new (very old) Yamaha Natural Sound Stereo Cassette Deck TC-920B. I took advice from people telling me to use Audacity, which I think is AWFUL. They somehow replace the line-in with Audiojingle and I had no USB line in option. Well I deleted Audacity and downloaded Ocenaudio--what a difference! Not only did it add back a USB option, but with my little Behringer interface, it worked perfectly after a restart. Thank you so much for Ocenaudio, so much better than Audacity! The sound is amazing!
Wow, thanks for finding both of these products! OcenAudio is GREAT, and I'll be ordering the ClearClick Audio2USB also. I usually use AVS4U software for audio\video, which has free software, but also sells about a dozen titles, often on sale for about $50 total, with free updates, and works a lot better than any Microsoft stuff.
For others who might pick up the same adapter. I don't suppose there are any distinguishing features on either side of the 3.5mm to RCA that might more readily indicate which side is appropriately labeled "L-R"? Like maybe even registration marks or ejection pin outlines from the molding? Not that it's THAT hard to figure out, just one of those annoyances. Still not as bad as when cheap cords and adapters outright screw up the red-white-yellow color coding.
It reminds me of the cable included with a cheap children's digital camera I found (2nd-hand), that had an 1/8" (3.5mm) plug on one end, and a 9-pin serial plug on the other. And yes, using it required special too.
I personally wouldn't use it myself as I would prefer recording using a better quality interface, but for your average Joe this looks spot on. Amazingly impressive that they can squeeze the circuitry into a moulded USB connector now. Good stuff!
Those adapters look really useful for all sorts of fun/cursed setups lol. And for the stereo L/R one you can solve the spacing issues with some more adapters and cables. As an occasional enthusiast I've learned that no problem can't be solved with additional cables.
Fun with cables and adapters. Phooey on Bluetooth or wireless transmission, get more cables. I like how the manufacturers could never decide if stereo connections should be red & black, red & white, white & black, green & white, black & black with red stripe, What fun.
That's pretty cool!! Nice review and tutorial I came across something recently, it is a USB out that supplies you with a stereo audio out and a microphone input. it is fairly tiny. Search for a USB sound card and many should show up. One of a few I own is the Orico branded one with an external volume control. It should work with windows, Linux and Apple
Top tip: if you rightclick on the audio levels on your windows recording device, you can change it from % to dB which gives you some more precise control.
@@murpesx Not quite true, Audacity can very well record even beyond 24-96, but your audio device has to support it. But ocenaudio's interface is way better, have been using it for years now.
@@phonatic I'm sure you're correct. There was something that made me switch to Ocenaudio because of a feature that Audacity lacked, but that was some time ago. Maybe it was ASIO support.
@@murpesx ASIO could be a reason. Windows audio has been terrible for years and I am glad I have passed beyond that with Linux. I never could warm up to Audacity UI, it's just very inconsistent and not well laid out. Ocenaudio has much less features but is really my first choise for quick'n'dirty tasks.
You'd be surprised how much electronics you can fit inside a standard USB connector. Most bluetooth and wifi adapters are little larger than the physical connector itself, usually the plastic shell is just so you can grab the thing.
I just got one of these to use with a Realistic SCT-34 that I had wanted as a teen when I first saw it in the Radio Shack catalog and found at a local Goodwill recently. It works great and I'm copying my tapes over to MP3 files right now.
I had a Behringer UPhono (UFO202) gadget that I lost some months ago, and this looks like a excellent semi-replacement. Though, to be fair, the UPhono had more features. It was actually a full-on USB sound card, but also featured a switchable magnetic/line input, line-level pass through, and headphone jack with volume control. In a pinch, I could even use it as a basic phono preamp even if I wasn't using it to digitize music. So this won't entirely replace my UPhono but it'll do for simple A/D conversion. Thank you for spotlighting this; I'm going to order a pair of them (cause I'm certain I'll lose at least one, lol).
Well, unfortunately lots of those cables are just scam ones, with no chip inside doing any conversion. This is very common also with hdmi to vga cables.
I don't think they always are scams. A lot of times they're cables for niche devices - that use a 3.5mm as a USB socket got some reason, for example. They're just not properly advertised on what they're made for. It's like a component to VGA cable. If you try to hook your old Xbox up to an old monitor with one of those, it ain't gonna work well since they're designed for projectors that are designed for component input using their VGA port.
@@elijahwatson8119 Yes, I have an old Epson Gideon projector that uses it’s VGA in port both for standard VGA input and for component input which requires a special VGA type connector to three component RCA plugs cable if you want to connect a component device to the projector such as DVD player. When I first got the thing wondered if I could use it to plug a laptop into a TV using the VGA to component cable but soon realized that this cable has no conversion chip in it and thus only works with compatible video projector that support component output via a VGA port (I believe their is a industry standard for that). As for cables that are USB A to 3.55mm headphone-style Jack, the iPod Shuffle 2nd Gen, 3rd, and 4th Gen all used the headphone Jack to transfer music and to charge the device using a special dock include that had 3.55mm plug sticking up from the dock stand and a USB A cable attached. You could also buy third party cables that didn’t have the dock and just looked just like the cable shown in this video and I don’t believe they include any conversion chip in the cable as far as I know. So indeed sometimes cables that seem like scams really have a valid use case even if sometimes the seller mislabeled them as having capabilities they don’t.
How is it surprising, given that Apple has been putting codecs (ADC/DAC combo) into Lightning plugs for years? Those have far less room than a USB-A plug. (And the Lightning to HDMI adapter actually contains an entire SoC running Darwin. All because Lightning doesn’t have the bandwidth for uncompressed 1080p video, so instead the phone outputs it as an h.264 stream that the dongle decodes and outputs to HDMI!)
This is pretty good! i'm surprised! Like when you did the silence test i was expecting to hear something some hiss or something.. but nope. nada, not a thing. I'm impressed. For my household though i'd probably still add a cheap snap on ferrite choke to it.
Issues I have is, you want to record 24/48 or 24/96 to ensure you capture all detail and allow headroom for editing, mixing, noise reduction, resampling
If you were wondering and haven't read the rest of the posts yet (or I missed a bit of VW's video), a small Analogue to Digital Converter (ADC) chip resides inside the USB plug end of the cable and converts the audio signal into a digital one. :)
The only advantage I see with a single cable is the less rca cables being used.More cables more input/output more degradation of the signal, plus added interference/noise.
Audacity is licensed under GPL 2 (or later at the user's option). I hope that CD with Audacity complied with the following from Audacity's website: "In granting you this right, the GPL requires that the source code you distribute is itself available under the GPL. If you distribute or recommend Audacity in any way, please cite our trademark by referring to Audacity as “Audacity(R)”."
Feb 2021: I've had great success with various tape decks patched to various Sony portable stereo digital recorders (ICD-PXnnn) - the ones WITH USB file transfer capability, as some elder models don't have USB) - - for my dad's old cassette tapes. Benefit here being I transferred an entire tape at a time (from an Auto-Reverse deck), then could quickly use the recorders' Split-track feature to break the tape into "tracks". Lastly, already coded in MP3 format, simply transfer the files off the recorder to PC / external file archive storage, etc. Recorders' Erase track feature also quick and readily usable to delete bad/dead spots/unwanted material as well, leaving only desired recordings in digital format, roughly 128Kpbs audio quality.
This may be useful for owners of automobiles built after 2018, or so. My friend just took delivery of a 2021 Mazda that was specified as having an AUX analog audio input for the sound system, but it turned out that Mazda deleted that feature, so there is no way to get an audio feed from, say, a portable CD player, cassette tape player, handheld ham radio transceiver, etc., in short, any older device that lacks Bluetooth or USB.
The modern DAC are tiny. Its like a 8 sodimm chip. But you can actually use the usb to record or send audio directly. While the usb is digital, it uses a 8/10 digital encoder. With the right software this can be used to emulate sound.
Dang, son. I'm genuinely surprised by this thing. And you get what you paid for, too, in terms of recording fidelity. Wonder if they'll ever get around to making something like this that will allow for a higher bitrate option.
I did not expect that it did work, as USB goes as in digital blocks, not as old firewire that goes as one digital stream not interrupted in blocks, but had not expected a small converter to be all built-in that USB plug 😁
Hey man! love your videos. Have been watching them for years. Can you do a experiment? Can you take a 4 port USB hub with 3 other USB2Audio cables and make a mixer out of that? If it works I'm gonna sell my focusrite and just use aux from now on.
I do lots of audio recording on my PC from different sources. I use the line input on my PC's sound card. When I bought this PC I specified that the computer has a line input on it. When I record I use GoldWave editor. Some sources like the output from audio chips for example the ones from singing greeting cards their audio overdrives my sound card so I use an in line volume control to limit the audio volume. It works better than the control built into the computer. I have a custom made audio cable just for recording from some sources. It is two alligator clips on one end and a 3.5mm plug on the other. If I got a newer machine I will consider buying this device.
That's definitely a cool device. Thank you for sharing. :-) I wonder how it would do when using it in conjunction with the SDR-Sharp program. I remember some years ago you created a video about listening to very low frequency radio signals through a computer's sound card and the SDR-Sharp program. That video got me off and running with experimenting with that fascinating subject. A retro-active "Thank You" for sharing that video too, VWestlife. :-)
For the viewing audience, here's VWestlife's video about using the sound card and SDR Sharp to listen to VLF radio signals: th-cam.com/video/L2W1x6Rb9hI/w-d-xo.html
The B104 recording sounds great! I Love the 90's "FM Radio" sound when all the processing was done analog. Pushing it to the limit is fine in the analog domain. In modern digital sound processors they're doing the same and it sounds even louder, but it doesn't sound as natural and musical as it did whit analog equipment. Let's say it's a little bit too much accurate. But that's off topic, it's all about sound processing on the transmitter site. Your DAC cable sounds fine.
Actually the first successful digital audio processor, the Orban Optimod-FM 8200, was introduced in 1992 and was in common use by major-market stations by the mid-1990s.
Around 2003 i had a small mp3 player with onboard memory and an sd card slot. The onboard memory was written with a usb to 3.5mm audio jack cable. I would always leave the usb end plugged into my pc. One day when i went to change mp3s, the 3.5mm plug wouldnt fit into the player. The black rings at the tip haf melted, oozed, and solidified back in an odd shape. I guess it shorted. Bought 2 different replacement cables off ebay, but they wouldnt talk to the player. I had to just live with those songs trapled on the onboard memory, and have the sd card with fresh songs. Then i upgraded to my 30gb zune. I loved that thing.
The only instance where I've needed something else (like a box rather than just a cable) is if conversion latency is a problem. For example, if the audio source being recorded is an electric guitar being played live, processing delay will throw off the guitarist. Audio interfaces for a use like that, are engineered to have low latency. A $45 M-Track is about as cheap as one should go.
A good thing to remember is that every adapter or extra connection in the chain adds about 3db of signal loss, so an adapter chain or extension cables on the audio side can degrade the signal
I bought a 1/4 inch jack to USB lead for my guitar afew years ago that looked similar to this. No box in the middle of the cable, just a slightly longer and fatter USB plug. Used it twice, then it shorted the USB socket on the (very old) computer. LOL.
Could this be used to input audio into an android phone or tablet? This would allow audio capture from CD or tapes/vinyl direct to the phone Also could allow cassette and cd playback through phone, then bluetooth into your car system or BT headphones
This will give you a lot of flexibility. I've seen those cheap Walkman size tape players on all of the websites. You get them and they all sound like nonsense and cheap. You know this will give you the opportunity to really hook up that big fancy awesome tape player to your computer and really get some good quality sound.
To those asking "Why don't you just use the line input of your sound card?" -- Like many newer PCs and Macs, the laptop I used in the video does not have a line input. The only audio input it has is the mono microphone terminal of its headset jack, which is not software-definable to work as anything else. So if your computer has a line input, that's great! But this product is for those who don't.
@Jackie Bereham "They sound better than the original albums now." That's really a subjective opinion. I've been using the same Thorens turntable for 25 years and I'm very used to the way it sounds. There's nothing I would rather listen to more.
@@briangoldberg4439 I think he knows it's subjective opinion, lol. Sorta a given with a common like that, he was giving his opinion after all.
My laptop, an ACER Aspire 3, has one jack for all. When I plug anything into it, it asks what I just plugged in. Options are line in, line out, mic in, headphones, headset, or speaker out. Obviously, I can only plug in one device at a time. There are three USB ports, an HDMI, as well as Bluetooth radio.
@@dougbrowning82 same with mine, combo jacks don't inherently mean mono in only.
@@dougbrowning82 One of OP's laptops also does this.
Good to see a non scam product for once
They certainly took some liberty in advertising the product's compatibility. There's no way it can safely interface, say, to a 4 dBu analogue source ("guitars, keyboards, synthesizers..." they say). Even my humble Revox tapedeck, with Dolby level set at precisely 0 dBu, can easily produce +10 dBu (8 V p-p) undistorted output from decent cassettes. This kind of level needs a hardware resistive pad (at the very least), not software adjustments.
I've seen some scam HDMI to VGA adapters that are for oddball TV sets that use the HDMI as a multi-in port in software, but people buy them not knowing that and then wonder why it doesn't work. same with some of the HDMI to composite cables i've seen.
@@DoubleMonoLR or when people buy them, even though it may be listed, people don't read.
@@tarstarkusz what the hell is "um"?
@@tarstarkusz LOL
Doesn't surprise me that they're using that design, DACs can be small enough to fit in a standard USB connector these days. In fact, the wired earbuds included with the iPhone, have a DAC in the tiny Lightning connector
Yes, the DAC chip will easily fit into the USB plug footprint, and even a lot of flash memory devices fit the entire flash chip and controller into the actual plug itself, with noting but the contacts as hard gold plate on the other side, and the shell wrapped around it. Your Apple lightning connector has integrated into it a pair of control and interface chips inside the connector already, to provide identification as to the cable serial number (thus the clones that get bricked every IOS upgrade) and the actual capabilities of the cable as to the functions it supports, from plain charging in various flavours to being able to handle audio and display, plus also to have USB capability.
@@timotheatae You're correct about USB-C having an analog output (Audio Adapter Accessory Mode), but Lightning does not have such a feature. There's a teardown of the EarPods that reveals a DAC inside the Lightning connector. appleinsider.com/articles/16/09/20/teardown-finds-dac-chips-in-apples-lightning-earpods-lightning-to-35mm-adapter-for-iphone-7
@@timotheatae Apple was chasing size reduction above all else with Lightning. Their 30-pin connector provided many such analogue signals, including composite video. With Lightning it was deemed these functions were more obscure and took up unnecessary space. Remember, the iPhone didn’t get rid of the headphone jack until a while after adopting Lightning. As far as they were concerned, to include such a feature would be a waste of circuit traces and connector pins. The iPod dock market wasn’t as hot anymore either, and they were the primary reason for including those signals in the 30-pin connector.
So it’s not really that surprising they had to add an extra chip when they did kill the headphone jack. Also, the Pixel phones’ USB-C headphone dongle is in fact a class-compliant USB audio device, and the adaptors that tap into those audio pins purportedly don’t work on the Pixel phones. I wouldn’t be surprised if most other manufacturers do it that other way though, they can reuse the DAC in the phone and the adaptor itself is cheaper.
@@WillOnSomething not even all USB-C adapters are using the audio adapter mode, the new ones are all with a DAC inside like the Lightning ones (Apple even makes one for their iPads)
No, lightning connectors have analog audio pins
That’s pretty crazy. A stereo usb interface the size of a cable for $17?
i got a cable like this off aliexpress for 8.60usd and works good
Why is it crazy? A cheap cable with a cheap generic but standard (these things have been tiny for a LONG time) that takes less than a dollar to make is crazy? Therere better ones than this for like 10 bucks anyway.
You’re here too!
you can do the same with $15 easycap and records video
Imagine this in the 90's, minds would be blown
As a side note, if you've always wanted to know what a level of 51 *really* means, right-click the field and it'll let you select a display in dB. The mapping can be... _interesting._
ok this video give me nostalgia because the quality gives off 2012 vibe
I high-key thought this was gonna be a scam, and was very pleasantly surprised.
Why highkey or lowkey anything? Your comment means the same without that btw.
@@gram. Why does that bother you? It's their writing style, and they can use those terms as they please. A lot of people use them now, actually! :)
@@vertihippo1274 this is the most sane comment I've seen on youtube
the audio from the ken tones was so spacious it made me feel like it was actually playing behind me, nice!
0:24 Sudden unexpected 8-Bit Guy cameo made me LOL.
I had to confirm the YT channel I was on...
There are weird USB cables like that, with a USB plug on one side and something else on the other end: audio jacks, phone plugs, firewire, rj45, ps2, db9, you name them. But they're just cables, designed for special purposes, and using them to connect stuff that isn't supposed to be connected together can be dangerous for the equipment.
So it's good to be careful, but it shouldn't be a surprise nowadays. Think about this: bluetooth earbuds have a full computer in them, complete with radio circuitry and antenna, dac, adc, speaker, several mic, a battery, and they're smaller than that connector...
And really a lot of things could get a lot smaller but it becomes an issue of practicality when your looking for somthing smaller than a thumbnail
0:24 Techmoan: "We're up all night to get lucky, we're up all night to get lucky" (36 seconds into this video th-cam.com/video/cIXOH1tJJu4/w-d-xo.html)
A man of culture
here's the full tune: th-cam.com/video/gdh6W27OR8M/w-d-xo.html
and the original video that the thing come from: th-cam.com/video/5ks3ucumilU/w-d-xo.html
This is a glock-19
@@RomanBellic (knocking)
@@RomanBellic So I'm driving here to get some help
To be honest, I'm surprised that you're surprised. Some of the dongles are rediculously tiny if you take out the actual jacks. Don't forget, you can get 512+ gigabyte "micro" flash drives (think Logitech unifying receiver but it's a storage device... Tiny). Besides... Everyone uses ADCs and DACs smaller than this in their phones and (apparently) don't even know it.
One of the most satisfying channels I've encountered on TH-cam. Thanks for all the content over the years!
This is totally unrelated but I really like your presentation style in all your videos. It has a nice "vintage TH-cam" feel but with way higher production value. Also your speaking voice is extremely clear and well paced.
Huh, a product of reasonable value that works well and does what it says? Don’t see that often anymore!
ADCs can be made tiny these days, though it’s definitely no less impressive to see that in practice!
It looks like it would never work. Crazy.
There’s an Amazon review that says it melted and almost started a fire, so I’m not so sure it “works.”
All the Van Halen albums through 1984 has Eddie's guitar predominantly coming through the left channel (except during solos that are mixed center), with just some echo/reverb of the guitar coming through the right channel. This may help identify left audio from right audio on the unlabeled adapter.
Nice tip but I'd just touch the pins of the RCA connector. That's usually enough to pick up some mains hum, and it even works without records.
@@eDoc2020 that is the most simple way. Don’t know why anyone would complicate it beyond that.
Or just plug the RCA adapter into only one of the two channels (leave the other side of the adapter "hanging".)
@@lauridsd did you not look at that adaptor? It doesn’t hang.
@@lauridsd Or just plug it in, start recording, and switch it around if it was wrong and then mark it. Or select invert channels in audacity if youre lazy
That is actually an impressive device, containing everything needed within the USB plug moulding, pretty clever... :)
It’s not impressive compared to the same thing inside a much, much, much smaller plug, which is exactly what Apple does in its Lightning EarPods and Lightning to headphone adapter.
@@tookitogo And......That has SOMETHING to do with connecting an analog audio device to a PC?!? 🤷♂️🤦♂️
@@jamesslick4790 Yeah it does. It's literally the same thing. Smartphones are just handheld PCs. A DAC is a DAC. Building a DAC into a connector is building a DAC into a connector, and the smartphones have smaller connectors so it is more impressive.
@@jamesslick4790 Of course it does, since the commenter found it “impressive” that they’d shrunk down the technology to fit in the plug. It’s literally the _exact same thing._ Headphones are analog audio devices, and a USB output used for digital audio is the same whether it’s connected to a PC or a phone. (Lightning audio output uses USB internally.)
@@tookitogo The APPLE device is LESS impressive as it adds an unnecessary layer, just to remain proprietary. But fanbois be fanbois I guess. This device is "agnostic" as to brand of input or output device or OS, and The OP was impressed that the thing has LESS bulk than the USUAL analog to USB devices. AND NO ONE IS HOOKING UP A Cassette deck to a PC with an iPhone.
The A/D converter chip is very common in many devices
There was a device called iMic that accepted Line level or headphone level input and it had a USB plug and was plug-and-play
I used them to feed the discriminator output from my Motorola 2-way radios to give ATCS-Monitor the live data from the radios
Because you have multiple radios each needing a sound card line level input, the iMic was needed or you needed to add extra sound cards.
I will definitely pick up some of these cables
it's so uncanny watching a video about a random amazon product and it actually turns out to be a good quality device!
So I just randomly browsed here and see that you're using the same wallpaper I used my first computer I had as a kid
0:28 My sister had THAT SAME Zenith "all in one" stereo back "in the day". It was actually a pretty nice unit!
I'm pleasantly surprised by its quality. It seems it tells Windows that it's a USB microphone, which I guess makes sense from an ease-of-implementation viewpoint. Sure, mucking about with the Windows input levels as you switch from source to source is a bit of an annoyance, but other than that, it does the job quite well.
That’s actually a pretty decent little ADC. Far less noisy than the built-in input on the computer, and lots don’t even have a separate one anymore, just a mic pin in the headphone jack. Plus the form factor makes it convenient and basically idiot-proof. The extra little adaptors make the user experience seem pretty pleasant. Not bad for under $20. It probably makes transfers that sound as good as the device they’re played on for most customers, unlike a built-in input. Now, let’s hope they’re saving as FLAC or WAV, or they might feel their originals still had a little something extra to them.
It's mostly laptops that don't have all those audio connectors. Even so, my Acer Nitro 5 supports line input as an option when you use the combo jack. Desktop computers that aren't cheap garbage also generally have different audio inputs. Even my 2009 desktop has 7.1 audio support and at 192 KHz 24 bit.
@@fungo6631 Plenty of integrated inputs claim those high rates but there's tests you can do to show they basically just increase the harmonic interference. You'll want to put it on 48kHz to actually get the best out of it. And, even with all that being said, the most premium integrated input is still going to be noisier than a proper dedicated conversion device. Now, you may not notice it personally, in which case go wild on your own personal transfers. You're not going to be layering them on top each other like people do in audio production, which is why they care so much about low noise.
@@kaitlyn__L This was a fairly high end LGA 775 mobo, and the S/N ratio was advertised as 117 dB. MSI P45-C51 is the mobo. It has mic and line input alongside the 7.1 output. Separate connectors, instead of sacrificing the mic and line inputs.
@@fungo6631 I understand. It’s from 2009, it obviously doesn’t have the single integrated port. Like I said, if you’re satisfied with your integrated sound, that’s just fine.
Nevertheless, there is only so much you can do on a motherboard when it comes to large trace gaps, only so many filtering caps you can fit, only so-clean of a power source when it’s being shared with the rest of the system. Dedicated interfaces will sound better for the same price as the premium for motherboard audio. And if you’re using the front panel connectors instead of the back, those tiny wires are also incredibly noisy.
I was a firm believer in premium integrated audio chips for years. I convinced myself buying a separate device was pointless. Until I actually had to buy one for an XLR input, and everything else sounded much better through it as well.
Again, I don’t want to make you feel bad about your current setup, or to convince you that you need to go out and spend a ton of money. What you have right now is fine for you. But whenever you’re going to be upgrading your audio setup anyway, consider buying an external interface.
One of my friends hated integrated audio but kept buying PCIe sound cards. And later, a Schitt audio interface for half the price sounded much better than her sound cards, and she was all like “why didn’t I do this sooner?”. (When she used the front panel connectors her headphone output was getting crosstalk into her microphone input, and the Schitt unit alleviated that too by having the output on her desk. No more choosing between crosstalk and reaching round the back.)
Every line input on a modern PC I've tested has outperformed these cheap interfaces. The frequency response on the USB units is poor.
That's some good quality audio. Clear with No background static 🔉🎙️🎤
Wow... it even does a great job capturing the low frequency sounds! Even my sub came alive from those recordings!
That converter has surprisingly good sound quality for that small size. Very cool ;)
This is indeed a great product. In fact everything we have reviewed from ClearClick has been great!
I assume its set up as a "Microphone Array" since it has two left and right channels, then it's just sensible that it sets itself up with two channels.
This video is a prime example of why I love your channel so much.
This is a great video! I have wondered about the lack of a line input on computers these days, and you seem to have found a really good solution! It sounded just fine to me over TH-cam. I think this solves a lot of problems, and it is great that it has no hum or noise. And on top of that, to discover a NEW audio processing software -- well, that makes your video golden to me (yes I like and use Audacity, but who can resist a different sound editor to add to my collection?) So thanks for the very useful video and again, your usual thoroughness and clarity. Love your channel!
I bought one of these on your recommendation a little over two years ago, and haven't used it yet.
I know, I know...why'd ya buy it?
Because if it fills a need, I know I will have ONE DAY when I get the time to digitize some of my hundreds of unique cassette recordings. Hopefully, the deck won't have dry rotted belts or something like that, and I won't croak before I get around to it. It's amazing how fully I found ways to occupy my time since retirement. If only I could figure out how to stop wasting time on sleep.
So glad to see John Laduca's Mr. Fantastic album at second one! Many people will find it very weird reading this enthusiastic comment over some elevator/Muzak music but, yes, you made me love this by playing it several times over the years on a few videos.
Nice one. Two obvious use cases (at least for my purposes):
- transferring WAV rips of retrocomputer tapes onto real cassette tape
- running said rips directly off a laptop into a vintage computer with a 3.5mm input for tape programs (I'm looking at you, Sinclair)
thats the first thing i thought about, old software on tape (there is tons of this already backed up on the interwebs too), make it easy to plug into old computers with modern pc. I did not think about preservation of these old tapes with this device tho, probably would work well if its really low noise.
This is becoming one of my favourite channels...Well done VWestlife pretty cool.
It looks like a lot of audio equipment uses a 3/4” spacing but it’s sort of a de-facto standard rather than anything formalized, as far as I can tell. A bunch of stuff out there uses a different spacing, often specifically to break compatibility. There’s probably some circuit layout reason why so many manufacturers just happen to do 3/4” RCA plug spacing.
It's not a circuit layout reason. Circuit boards are often laid 90 degrees from the connectors, so the easiest thing for manufacturers to do is to buy a combo jack, ie one piece of plastic with both left and right jacks. So they both save on board space and manufacturing time.
@@xureality well yeah having a single integrated stereo pair obviously makes the most sense, but the fact that it's all using the same spacing is the de-facto thing which I thought might have a circuit layout reason behind it (like something to do with standard trace/perfboard/etc. spacing or something).
For that last test, I would have put the recording level at maximum as a stress test to see if ANY noise was being picked up.
I just connected my turntable, open reel deck, 6 track player and cassette deck to an old Radio Shack mixer and plugged it into my line-in jack. Have copied over 400 albums and all sound great
I was having such a difficult time with my brand new (very old) Yamaha Natural Sound Stereo Cassette Deck TC-920B. I took advice from people telling me to use Audacity, which I think is AWFUL. They somehow replace the line-in with Audiojingle and I had no USB line in option. Well I deleted Audacity and downloaded Ocenaudio--what a difference! Not only did it add back a USB option, but with my little Behringer interface, it worked perfectly after a restart. Thank you so much for Ocenaudio, so much better than Audacity! The sound is amazing!
Wow, thanks for finding both of these products! OcenAudio is GREAT, and I'll be ordering the ClearClick Audio2USB also. I usually use AVS4U software for audio\video, which has free software, but also sells about a dozen titles, often on sale for about $50 total, with free updates, and works a lot better than any Microsoft stuff.
For others who might pick up the same adapter. I don't suppose there are any distinguishing features on either side of the 3.5mm to RCA that might more readily indicate which side is appropriately labeled "L-R"? Like maybe even registration marks or ejection pin outlines from the molding? Not that it's THAT hard to figure out, just one of those annoyances. Still not as bad as when cheap cords and adapters outright screw up the red-white-yellow color coding.
There is no identifying mark. You just have to figure out on your own which is left and right.
I so love the use of David Murray at 0:24, perfectly expressing the quality of this modern equipment ;)
It reminds me of the cable included with a cheap children's digital camera I found (2nd-hand), that had an 1/8" (3.5mm) plug on one end, and a 9-pin serial plug on the other. And yes, using it required special too.
I personally wouldn't use it myself as I would prefer recording using a better quality interface, but for your average Joe this looks spot on. Amazingly impressive that they can squeeze the circuitry into a moulded USB connector now. Good stuff!
Well I see this useful for stuff that isn't going to output high quality audio in the first place, like my phone for example
@@AstoundingAmelia exactly.
Those adapters look really useful for all sorts of fun/cursed setups lol. And for the stereo L/R one you can solve the spacing issues with some more adapters and cables. As an occasional enthusiast I've learned that no problem can't be solved with additional cables.
Fun with cables and adapters. Phooey on Bluetooth or wireless transmission, get more cables. I like how the manufacturers could never decide if stereo connections should be red & black, red & white, white & black, green & white, black & black with red stripe, What fun.
What a wonderfully simple (but compact) device.
At least you can use your own quality equipment!
7:59 I like that jingle ID, I don't hear these type of ID's anymore.
B one oh Fouurrrr
Wow! Sweet jack, I bought the analog adapters separately ages ago.
Good video Kevin. Thank for sharing. I'd love to see a video where you share a little about how you get all these great obscure albums and/or songs.
They are almost all thrift store finds.
@@vwestlife That's what I suspected. Thought there might possibly have been more to it. Thanks for replying.
Thanks, your videos are always made well, and informative.
I loved that you made your own sticker to show Left and Right, they should have definitely done that for you though.
"This mono voice recording wasn't a good example of high fidelity audio, so, I'll play this home recording of FM radio from the 90s"
That's pretty cool!! Nice review and tutorial
I came across something recently, it is a USB out that supplies you with a stereo audio out and a microphone input. it is fairly tiny. Search for a USB sound card and many should show up. One of a few I own is the Orico branded one with an external volume control. It should work with windows, Linux and Apple
Top tip: if you rightclick on the audio levels on your windows recording device, you can change it from % to dB which gives you some more precise control.
Yes, that's what I do.
I have one since about 4 years and I really like it. Pretty good quality. I use it on Linux. No additional drivers needed there.
Heard about ocenaudio before, but never tried it out. Looks like a good free alternative to Audacity.
Ocenaudio can record in 96/24, whereas Audacity cannot.
@@murpesx Any other advantages? I still miss CoolEdit.
@@murpesx Not quite true, Audacity can very well record even beyond 24-96, but your audio device has to support it. But ocenaudio's interface is way better, have been using it for years now.
@@phonatic I'm sure you're correct. There was something that made me switch to Ocenaudio because of a feature that Audacity lacked, but that was some time ago. Maybe it was ASIO support.
@@murpesx ASIO could be a reason. Windows audio has been terrible for years and I am glad I have passed beyond that with Linux. I never could warm up to Audacity UI, it's just very inconsistent and not well laid out. Ocenaudio has much less features but is really my first choise for quick'n'dirty tasks.
That old radio jingle. Such nostalgia. Also dying at the number of corporate overlords they wedged in.
You'd be surprised how much electronics you can fit inside a standard USB connector. Most bluetooth and wifi adapters are little larger than the physical connector itself, usually the plastic shell is just so you can grab the thing.
Them pops and cracks bring back memories but i dont miss them
Vwestlife, only big youtuber uploading videos in 720p and I love it!!
GradeAUnderA has over 3 million subscribers and still uploads in 480p.
@@vwestlife wow I actually watch grade and never noticed it's only 480p, maybe because the animation haha
Honestly I always used the line in Jack from my PC and recorded the Audio with Audacity. It works fine
Gotta say, pretty epic! This is very cool, I love finding tech that’s so suspiciously good and find it it’s just very good.
That went surprisingly well for this product, I really enjoyed this video ^^
As ever i'm watching your new video.. Hope you have a nice week Kevin. Miguel
Nice to see that this DAC's software is simple enough that Win 7 can cope with it.
I just got one of these to use with a Realistic SCT-34 that I had wanted as a teen when I first saw it in the Radio Shack catalog and found at a local Goodwill recently. It works great and I'm copying my tapes over to MP3 files right now.
I had a Behringer UPhono (UFO202) gadget that I lost some months ago, and this looks like a excellent semi-replacement. Though, to be fair, the UPhono had more features. It was actually a full-on USB sound card, but also featured a switchable magnetic/line input, line-level pass through, and headphone jack with volume control. In a pinch, I could even use it as a basic phono preamp even if I wasn't using it to digitize music.
So this won't entirely replace my UPhono but it'll do for simple A/D conversion. Thank you for spotlighting this; I'm going to order a pair of them (cause I'm certain I'll lose at least one, lol).
Well, unfortunately lots of those cables are just scam ones, with no chip inside doing any conversion. This is very common also with hdmi to vga cables.
What! Hahaha, never figured that. That would drive a non techy person nuts.
I don't think they always are scams. A lot of times they're cables for niche devices - that use a 3.5mm as a USB socket got some reason, for example. They're just not properly advertised on what they're made for.
It's like a component to VGA cable. If you try to hook your old Xbox up to an old monitor with one of those, it ain't gonna work well since they're designed for projectors that are designed for component input using their VGA port.
@@elijahwatson8119 exactly
@@elijahwatson8119 Yes, I have an old Epson Gideon projector that uses it’s VGA in port both for standard VGA input and for component input which requires a special VGA type connector to three component RCA plugs cable if you want to connect a component device to the projector such as DVD player. When I first got the thing wondered if I could use it to plug a laptop into a TV using the VGA to component cable but soon realized that this cable has no conversion chip in it and thus only works with compatible video projector that support component output via a VGA port (I believe their is a industry standard for that). As for cables that are USB A to 3.55mm headphone-style Jack, the iPod Shuffle 2nd Gen, 3rd, and 4th Gen all used the headphone Jack to transfer music and to charge the device using a special dock include that had 3.55mm plug sticking up from the dock stand and a USB A cable attached. You could also buy third party cables that didn’t have the dock and just looked just like the cable shown in this video and I don’t believe they include any conversion chip in the cable as far as I know. So indeed sometimes cables that seem like scams really have a valid use case even if sometimes the seller mislabeled them as having capabilities they don’t.
How is it surprising, given that Apple has been putting codecs (ADC/DAC combo) into Lightning plugs for years? Those have far less room than a USB-A plug. (And the Lightning to HDMI adapter actually contains an entire SoC running Darwin. All because Lightning doesn’t have the bandwidth for uncompressed 1080p video, so instead the phone outputs it as an h.264 stream that the dongle decodes and outputs to HDMI!)
This is pretty good! i'm surprised! Like when you did the silence test i was expecting to hear something some hiss or something.. but nope. nada, not a thing. I'm impressed. For my household though i'd probably still add a cheap snap on ferrite choke to it.
I grew up listening to B104 in Allentown, PA. Crazy throw back. Didn’t have the jingle I remember yet in this clip though.
Issues I have is, you want to record 24/48 or 24/96 to ensure you capture all detail and allow headroom for editing, mixing, noise reduction, resampling
If you were wondering and haven't read the rest of the posts yet (or I missed a bit of VW's video), a small Analogue to Digital Converter (ADC) chip resides inside the USB plug end of the cable and converts the audio signal into a digital one. :)
The only advantage I see with a single cable is the less rca cables being used.More cables more input/output more degradation of the signal, plus added interference/noise.
Audacity is licensed under GPL 2 (or later at the user's option). I hope that CD with Audacity complied with the following from Audacity's website: "In granting you this right, the GPL requires that the source code you distribute is itself available under the GPL. If you distribute or recommend Audacity in any way, please cite our trademark by referring to Audacity as “Audacity(R)”."
Feb 2021: I've had great success with various tape decks patched to various Sony portable stereo digital recorders (ICD-PXnnn) - the ones WITH USB file transfer capability, as some elder models don't have USB) - - for my dad's old cassette tapes. Benefit here being I transferred an entire tape at a time (from an Auto-Reverse deck), then could quickly use the recorders' Split-track feature to break the tape into "tracks". Lastly, already coded in MP3 format, simply transfer the files off the recorder to PC / external file archive storage, etc. Recorders' Erase track feature also quick and readily usable to delete bad/dead spots/unwanted material as well, leaving only desired recordings in digital format, roughly 128Kpbs audio quality.
I just use an external sound card with a line input. I bought it almost 10 years ago and it's been doing the job ever since.
Same. Mine even has 7.1 audio support and it's not even exactly new.
Yeah, I don't understand this product when every laptop and desktop has a line in or mic in.
This may be useful for owners of automobiles built after 2018, or so. My friend just took delivery of a 2021 Mazda that was specified as having an AUX analog audio input for the sound system, but it turned out that Mazda deleted that feature, so there is no way to get an audio feed from, say, a portable CD player, cassette tape player, handheld ham radio transceiver, etc., in short, any older device that lacks Bluetooth or USB.
The modern DAC are tiny. Its like a 8 sodimm chip. But you can actually use the usb to record or send audio directly. While the usb is digital, it uses a 8/10 digital encoder. With the right software this can be used to emulate sound.
I was honestly surprised to hear a radio station I can get near my home from your high fidelity test :p
Dang, son. I'm genuinely surprised by this thing.
And you get what you paid for, too, in terms of recording fidelity.
Wonder if they'll ever get around to making something like this that will allow for a higher bitrate option.
You made my day - I have been looking for such a solution since years.
Who would have thought a magical audio conversion wizard would be hiding inside a tiny cable
I did not expect that it did work, as USB goes as in digital blocks, not as old firewire that goes as one digital stream not interrupted in blocks, but had not expected a small converter to be all built-in that USB plug 😁
0:31 For years my aunt next door had that same Zenith turntable / receiver / 8-track / Cassette deck. It was awesome.
Hey man! love your videos. Have been watching them for years. Can you do a experiment? Can you take a 4 port USB hub with 3 other USB2Audio cables and make a mixer out of that? If it works I'm gonna sell my focusrite and just use aux from now on.
I do lots of audio recording on my PC from different sources. I use the line input on my PC's sound card. When I bought this PC I specified that the computer has a line input on it. When I record I use GoldWave editor. Some sources like the output from audio chips for example the ones from singing greeting cards their audio overdrives my sound card so I use an in line volume control to limit the audio volume. It works better than the control built into the computer. I have a custom made audio cable just for recording from some sources. It is two alligator clips on one end and a 3.5mm plug on the other.
If I got a newer machine I will consider buying this device.
That's definitely a cool device. Thank you for sharing. :-)
I wonder how it would do when using it in conjunction with the SDR-Sharp program. I remember some years ago you created a video about listening to very low frequency radio signals through a computer's sound card and the SDR-Sharp program. That video got me off and running with experimenting with that fascinating subject. A retro-active "Thank You" for sharing that video too, VWestlife. :-)
For the viewing audience, here's VWestlife's video about using the sound card and SDR Sharp to listen to VLF radio signals: th-cam.com/video/L2W1x6Rb9hI/w-d-xo.html
The B104 recording sounds great! I Love the 90's "FM Radio" sound when all the processing was done analog. Pushing it to the limit is fine in the analog domain. In modern digital sound processors they're doing the same and it sounds even louder, but it doesn't sound as natural and musical as it did whit analog equipment. Let's say it's a little bit too much accurate. But that's off topic, it's all about sound processing on the transmitter site. Your DAC cable sounds fine.
Actually the first successful digital audio processor, the Orban Optimod-FM 8200, was introduced in 1992 and was in common use by major-market stations by the mid-1990s.
I like that design. And good to hear it works fine.
Would you recommend any specific phono preamp?
Oh wow that recording audio of radio said Allentown. I Only live 30 minutes away from Allentown PA.
It's actually good! I would have never guessed it.
I first discovered this cord on Record-Ology's channel and it works very well with Audacity on Ubuntu 20.04.
Love your content! You should try reviewing one of those generic "DIGITNOW! USB 2.0 Turntables".Mám pocit, že tie veci by ťa zbláznili.
Around 2003 i had a small mp3 player with onboard memory and an sd card slot. The onboard memory was written with a usb to 3.5mm audio jack cable. I would always leave the usb end plugged into my pc. One day when i went to change mp3s, the 3.5mm plug wouldnt fit into the player. The black rings at the tip haf melted, oozed, and solidified back in an odd shape. I guess it shorted. Bought 2 different replacement cables off ebay, but they wouldnt talk to the player. I had to just live with those songs trapled on the onboard memory, and have the sd card with fresh songs. Then i upgraded to my 30gb zune. I loved that thing.
The only instance where I've needed something else (like a box rather than just a cable) is if conversion latency is a problem. For example, if the audio source being recorded is an electric guitar being played live, processing delay will throw off the guitarist. Audio interfaces for a use like that, are engineered to have low latency. A $45 M-Track is about as cheap as one should go.
A good thing to remember is that every adapter or extra connection in the chain adds about 3db of signal loss, so an adapter chain or extension cables on the audio side can degrade the signal
Really? I’ve never heard that fact.
The iPod shuffle did a really cool thing with USB to Mini Jack. I thought this video was gonna be on that😂
I bought a 1/4 inch jack to USB lead for my guitar afew years ago that looked similar to this. No box in the middle of the cable, just a slightly longer and fatter USB plug. Used it twice, then it shorted the USB socket on the (very old) computer. LOL.
That’s why I keep old ones, for “burners or throw away’s”!
Could this be used to input audio into an android phone or tablet?
This would allow audio capture from CD or tapes/vinyl direct to the phone
Also could allow cassette and cd playback through phone, then bluetooth into your car system or BT headphones
This will give you a lot of flexibility. I've seen those cheap Walkman size tape players on all of the websites. You get them and they all sound like nonsense and cheap. You know this will give you the opportunity to really hook up that big fancy awesome tape player to your computer and really get some good quality sound.