As a woman who suffered through the foster system because my bio mother was terribly unfit to care for any child, I’m still waiting for anti-abortion folk to create effective, humane solutions for the amount of foster children that have always been in existence. In other words, there have always been too many foster children and not enough qualified homes for them to go to…are these issues being addressed or is forcing women to birth unwanted children their magical solution? Either way, know this: Children suffer. An undeveloped fetus can’t. Forcing these pregnancies is downright criminal.
Taking responsibility for your actions such as, but not limited to: being more selective of who you sleep with, being an adult, buying, and enforcing contraceptive measures on the guy you decided to spend your evening with?
@@ShadyPanther25 Unwanted pregnancies in situations where a child may suffer abuse, neglect or lack of adequate family resources occur within marriages too, clown. Nobody's reasons and methods for managing their own reproduction and life events are your business whatsoever.
How judgemental! It’s not always about who you sleep with or birthcontrol. Many women cannot take birthconrol, why not put the onus on men? Give them free vasectomies when they are young so they can’t get anyone pregnant. It is reversible when they are responsible enough to have children with a woman who wants them. A Lot less abused children and help solve the 700,000 Foster children who age out of fostercare with nowhere to go
@@artandarchitecture6399 It's not the payment that is the problem. It's that these idiots are stripping a women's rights to choose, while letting men continue getting their rocks of free and clear.
My grandmother lost her life to an illegal abortion with a clothes hanger. She bled to death, leaving my mom and her siblings traumatised forever. My mom had to leave school and look after her siblings from her twelfth..it destroyed her life….. what for? And the same people who have taken the right to safe and legal abortions away, don’t want to do anything about gun safety? Please, please please……
Exactly! How many have died from mass killings? How many children have to worry about being killed in their schools? Vote BLUE to save women's rights to choose. Vote Blue to save our children from being killed by military type weapons.
Abortion is murder, murder is not a right. Its no ones fault that your grandmother lost her life but her own as it was her choice to try a dangerous illegal procedure. That being said it still is horrible.
@@igorzisky Compassionate denial of existence to miserable beings who would otherwise suffer is right and proper. How much pain would Ethan Crumbly's victims and parents be spared if they'd only have the courage to do the right thing?
Of course they don't care about fetuses or zygotes, or embryos. It is all about controlling women for men's benefit. Always has been, always will be. To prioritize a fetus or zygote or embryo over a woman is insane. Period.
The laws are meant for the general population. Not the rich or the government. This is how you can have a political candidate have a woman get an abortion to protect his assets while at once campaigning against it. The police literally run down people in stolen cars with police cruisers with "Seized Vehicle" decals in the side. The government basically legalizes profitable criminality for itself while outlawing it for everyone else.
We in Holland wonder if these people are pro life why don't they first take care of the thousands homeless children in the USA, or does these kids don't matter ?
Because you can't use logic with these people. They're not interested in that baby/child. They're interested in controlling women. Trying to take women back to a time when they were viewed as less than individuals. Couldn't vote,own land,have their own bank accounts. The repuklicans don't want women to think for themselves, have jobs,etc. They want a man to control them,and everything.
This isn't about abortion per se, it's about the deeper issue of men and religious interests controlling women, the "Christian family" and reproduction. It certainly is not about being "pro life".
@@zarbins Allowing mothers to die from Ectopic Pregnancies which are completely non-viable is not pro life. Your are literally killing people WHO WANT TO HAVE KIDS. That is how stupid the Right Wing complete ban position is. If you have a messed up embryo in South or Conservative State it is almost a Death Sentence. What is Pro Life about that exactly? Republicans have gone complete brain dead. Can't even discuss issues with nuance. Literally killing people who want families.
Given the violent history, it is appalling that protesting at clinics is still allowable. It's one thing to voice your opposition to policies. It is quite another to obstruct, intimidate, and threaten people who are accessing legally allowable health care. It is also a violation of their privacy.
So the argument that I hear is this. Democrats claim abortion is not a form of murder. However, when they defend their position on abortion, they accuse Republicans, who think abortion is murder, of being hypocrites, because they support the death penalty If it's not murder, then you shouldn't be comparing it with the death penalty… That sounds more like you're admitting that abortion is murder "Abortion is not murder, but I'm gonna compare it to the death penalty when I accuse Republicans of being hypocrites…
@@ykcirnhoj2225 there is a bit of a difference. Having an abortion affects only the pregnancy and no one else…not being vaccinated for a deadly disease ( _any_ deadly disease) can, and often does, affect others. I don’t care if someone refuses to take the Covid vaccine unless their place of employment demands that their employees do so.
@@beverly719 if a vaccine works how does it effect others so your employer has rights over your body but if you want a termination of late stage pregnancy is not the business of the father lol ok
@@beverly719 There is a bit of a difference. Killing an unborn baby affects the life that was ended due to murder. People's decision to not take a shot of some unknown new experiment does not affect others.
What should scare anyone that cares about access to this drug and other birth control pills is that if you know who gets into power, he could potentially appoint the next head of the FDA.
thats not the point. and whos to say you wouldnt got to prision for that. if these nut jobs had their way no holds barred posessing that pill would probably get you convicted of attemted murder. lets not forget the slippery slope. @@AllDogsAreGoodDogs
Roe was passed the year I graduated in 1973! Never in a million years did I think it would be taken away. I remember the bombing of abortion clinics. Bombs delivered to providers. Very scary times. This is insanity!
I've always had a hard time understanding why the US has abortion clinics as seperate healthcare institutions. In Denmark abortion is done at a hospital, same as any other medical procedure. It seems like separating women's healthcare from all other healthcare is a deliberate choice, so patients and staff can be singled out and targeted for harrassment.
In the UK, at one time, the waiting time for an abortion on the NHS (state health care that most people use most of the time) is often too long so women have to go to private abortion clinics. I'm hoping that the introduction of medication has reduced those waiting times.
@@nlwilson4892 Wouldn't that be a problem of the NHS having too few resources? Wouldn't a better solution be more resources to the NHS rather than private abortion clinics?
@@quietreason8679Yes, the problem was a lack of resources. Yes, it would be better if the government had provided more resources for the NHS. But because they didn't, people had to go to private clinics, for some you had to pay but others were run by charities.
In the US a large number of hospitals are Catholic run and those hospitals refuse to do anything abortion related. A woman seeking abortion because she was miscarrying was turned away several times from a Catholic hospital in Bellingham WA. During her fourth visit the doctors told her she was developing sepsis and the doctor was made to wait three hours while she made the case to the hospital ethics board to save her life. My daughter goes to college in Bellingham and it fills me with terror that she could be turned away with a life threatening medical condition.
As a former clinic defender, I remember those frightening days. We need allies that benefit from FDA approved medications to step up along with those that benefit from IVF to defend safe abortion pills.
If one good thing has come out of this post-Roe era, it's that we're not shy about saying the word "abortion" anymore. Because we never should have been in the first place
This is something that AMERICA had settled in the 90's. In most states, clinic's would perform a Safe & Legal abortion up to 12/16 weeks. For whatever reason, it was a LEGAL Procedure.
@@John-jz7zz civilazation will operate just fine. it's not your business nor mine to tell women what to do with their bodies and they should decide for themselves. leave your personal and religious beliefs out of it!
@@tomtom8786 first, religion has nothing to do with this. Unless you’re referring to the progressive cult that you subscribe to. Second, who has a legitimate right to decide what happens to the child’s body? And why?
@@John-jz7zzReligion has everything to do with it. The entire anti-abortion ideology is religious. It’s a venture organized and sponsored by politicized religious groups.
No it's not Biden it's Obama and Clinton at least get honest about it.. they selected brain dead because he'd be the easiest one to control and of course with Kamala kackling Kamala
NO ONE should be butting into the healthcare decisions of a pregnant person. I'd widen your statement from "politicians" to include all the damned busybodies that think they have the right to an opinion about someone else's healthcare choices.
Doctors who don't want to perform abortions because it is against their conscience don't have to. Why should doctors whose consciences dictate they not turn patients away be denied the same validity? Why should they be prevented by law from following THEIR consciences when a proven treatment is available? Only a particular sector of doctors are being allowed to practice according to their conscience. The rest are being forced to abandon their patients against their consciences. How is this justifiable?
if your conscience has religious infringement, do not become a doctor. Go preach somewhere , you have no place in a hospital. Abortion is legal in my country . A couple of years ago a case went viral ... a young lady died in the hospital . She was misscarrieing , but not quick enough, so she needed emergency abortion to stop her from bleeding out. The doctour said it was against his religion to perform the abortion (MUSLIM- if you are wandering ...) The nurses said the husband cried in his knees on the hallways , BEGGING the doctour to save his wife....He refused. She DIED. ...there were criminal charges against the doctour ....but would you like to be that husband ?
Laziness should never be an excuse for abortion. I'm healthy doctor I'm just to lazy to raise a child and to selfish to let someone else do it and way too ignorant to let the dad do it.
The fear I have for my 10 and 12 yr old granddaughter's is so overwhelming ... In May I will be 70yrs old and I pray I live long enough to see their rights as woman protected forever .. I was married in Dec. 1971.... I was 21 when I was blessed with my first child ... Fun fact his birthday is JANUARY 22, 1976 Exactly three years to the day after Roe v. Wade ..... It's scary to think that only 3 yrs protected what could have been a different decision on my part ... PLEASE LEAVE WOMAN'S BODIES ALONE !! ALWAYS VOTE BLUE 💙🇺🇸💙🇺🇸💙🇺🇸💙
A simple test... Imagine that you are in your mother's womb and you hear 2 people talking to your mother. One is telling her that she has her right to her body, abort if wish. The other is telling your mother don't abort, give your baby a chance and I promise that when your is born he/she will someday look in eyes and say "I LOVE YOU".. Which person Do you want your mother to listen to?
It seems as though SCOTUS is taking the right to actually "Make" law... when their job is only to interpret the law... The job of making law falls only to the house not scotus...
If this drug is pulled it is going to put even more of a strain on abortion clinics in states that permit it. Because procedural abortions take way more time and resources. The ripple effect would be big and beyond peoples access to the drug itself. Basically states that don’t permit will be getting their way even more because the states that do won’t be able to manage the need.
Let's talk about the abortions committed in Uvalde through preservation of the 2nd amendment; the conservative clap trap of women aborting after birth falls on its face. Louisiana has the highest prison population per capita, uncontrollable crime, the electric chair and leathal injection. They can't jail or execute people fast enough to maintain safety. Less life might just help out in a situation like that.
So the proper way to handle these doctors is to require them to give a referral to another doctor if they aren't willing to do the procedure. I can get behind them not being forced to perform abortions, or ANY procedure they're not comfortable with. You can't get birth control from catholic hospitals. It's always been that way. When my dad worked for one, he'd just tell his patients where they could get them at low or no cost. He wouldn't have performed an abortion but he would have told his patients there are other doctors that they can work with if they need care he can't provide... And probably also try to convince them to try a different route. He's anti choice, but he's not a complete jerk.
Missed the benefit of mifepristone allowing many women to not have to undergo an medical procedure which is physically unpleasant and has more serious side effects than a pill!
Why is #3 even a question? 1A isn't just freedom to practice religion, *it's also freedom FROM religion,* which means constitutionally you can't force your religious beliefs on others. Your religion says you can't have an abortion? Cool, then don't. But you don't get to tell someone else *_they_* can't have an abortion because of your religious views.
credibility to who? you? just go back to dropping fries at the back of your McDonald's job. and leave legal decisions to people who know what they are talking about.
Most non-activist constitutional scholars do not think the supreme court lost any credibility after roe v wade. I've even heard liberals talk about how poorly formulated Roe v. Wade was and it passed due to SC activist fiat and was not in alignment with anything even the most progressive Europe had passed. What's more telling is 3 democratic presidents (Clinton, Obama, and Biden) had the opportunity to codify Roe v Wade into law and did not. "In a speech Obama gave to Planned Parenthood Action Fund on July 17, 2007, the then-presidential candidate said, “The first thing I’d do as president is sign the Freedom of Choice Act.” He referenced it again in 2008, on the 35th Anniversary of Roe v. Wade." You should be asking yourself why they always promised to do this and never delivered. The answer is quote horrifying.
@@thedragon2148 It's a fact.check it out.people have no faith in the supreme court.maybe you should just keep collecting your food stamps and stop pretending you have anything meaningful to say
I'm in my 70's. It's sad that my family didn't want to fight for reproductive freedom. Now it's gone for my grand and great grands. It's their fight now. I'm disgustedly done! If they want it they can fight for it like I did.
Slavery is comprised of two principal components - forced labour and forced marriage. Both refer to situations of exploitation that a person cannot refuse or cannot leave because of threats, violence, coercion, deception, or abuse of power. Forcing women to carry unwanted pregnancies against their will and forcing women to give birth against their will is reproductive slavery. In fact, slave owners forced female slaves to give birth against their will before slavery was abolished.
Simple question -- did slave women have any reproductive choice? No. They were used as breeding cattle. Forced breeding, forced birth, and denial of healthcare is what you want? THEN YOU WOULD HAVE LOVED SLAVERY. Congrats.
Slave women ALSO had no reproductive freedom. They were actually experimented on without their consent. Maybe take a second or two to think about the comparison you're trying to make.
If a Doctor disagrees with the use of a medication on a personal level, then they can refuse to prescribe it. Or just not see women, if they think it is dangerous then present evidence, to the relevant authorities (FDA), to go and conduct further research and consultation in America and worldwide. Then a medical/ scientific determination and or new advisory advice on the use of the drug.
Hmm, I don't know, maybe remembering the news coverage of what was happening in the 80s and the well documented evidence of the drug being invented and eventually introduced into the US.
You don't have a clue, any person born in Puerto Rico is a "National Born Citizen" of the United States, they can't vote because of where they live, not because of who they are.
@@Mathew-8896: He can’t sell that much of it. It was part of the merger agreement. He can’t sell large portions of his stock (because the price would drop) and he can’t use it as collateral for loans because if he can’t pay back the loan the banks would foreclose on it and sell it to get their money back (which would also cause the price to drop). He’s essentially stuck with it for at least two years. He can sell small amounts of it though.
Are you aware U.S. Presidents can only hold office for two terms? Why would you write 2024, 2028? How would you react if Biden had campaign signs that read 2024, 2028? Hmmm....
As soon as Congress reconvenes, the first order of business is to repeal the Comstock Act. It doesn't matter which party controls the House-GET the GOP on the record regarding this statute that should have been completely repealed in the 1970s. Get the Republicans on the record on this issue, and then, if any of them support it, work to defeat them.
I want a legislator to propose a bill call the Impregnators Responsibility Bill. All impregnators must pay for the healthcare and prenatal care and birth of the resulting fetus. And the education and healthcare and upbringing of the resulting fetus until the age of 18. It can be proven by DNA. That would be pro life. 😂
The doctor should get out of being a doctor. make a living doing something else. Obviously, being a doctor goes against what they believe. I say get out .I personally don't want them to touch me. I would rather have someone who is not bias against me, or what I believe 😤
Honestly, they don't even need to stop being a doctor, they can just specialise in areas where this situation doesn't come up, geriatrics, pediatrics, orthopaedics etc.
@@texforister7023 Christianity is supposed to be a faith based religion right? There's only one problem, Christians.....HAVE NO FAITH NONE!! YOUR SCARED OF EVERYTHING!!!YOU NAME IT CHRISTIANS ARE SCARED OF IT. AND IF BY SOME MIRACLE THEY'RE NOT SCARED OF IT.......THEN THEY'RE ATTACKING IT.
You can be charged child support for a child that can be legally aborted because it really isn’t alive yet, but it’s only considered alive if someone can fleece you for money for it.
Not till its born. Birth control is not the sole job of the woman. If you wore a rubber or had a vasectomy, nobody could make you pay for a thing. Men are such babies.
As a woman who suffered through the foster system because my bio mother was terribly unfit to care for any child, I’m still waiting for anti-abortion folk to create effective, humane solutions for the amount of foster children that have always been in existence. In other words, there have always been too many foster children and not enough qualified homes for them to go to…are these issues being addressed or is forcing women to birth unwanted children their magical solution? Either way, know this: Children suffer. An undeveloped fetus can’t. Forcing these pregnancies is downright criminal.
Taking responsibility for your actions such as, but not limited to: being more selective of who you sleep with, being an adult, buying, and enforcing contraceptive measures on the guy you decided to spend your evening with?
@@ShadyPanther25 Describe how any of this could possibly be your business.
@@ShadyPanther25 Unwanted pregnancies in situations where a child may suffer abuse, neglect or lack of adequate family resources occur within marriages too, clown. Nobody's reasons and methods for managing their own reproduction and life events are your business whatsoever.
How judgemental! It’s not always about who you sleep with or birthcontrol. Many women cannot take birthconrol, why not put the onus on men? Give them free vasectomies when they are young so they can’t get anyone pregnant. It is reversible when they are responsible enough to have children with a woman who wants them. A Lot less abused children and help solve the 700,000 Foster children who age out of fostercare with nowhere to go
Funny how none of them seem to be willing to open their homes to all those kids, isn't it?
Could we please have a group of female doctors sue to remove Viagra.
Yeah, I don't think it is safe. Take it away from Alito and Thomas.
Yeah, then guys could just go to sleep after one time.
I second that.
@@artandarchitecture6399 It's not the payment that is the problem. It's that these idiots are stripping a women's rights to choose, while letting men continue getting their rocks of free and clear.
If Viagra had a k-ill rate like the abortion pill does (over 99.9+% if taken by a pregnant woman) then I'd want it banned.
My grandmother lost her life to an illegal abortion with a clothes hanger. She bled to death, leaving my mom and her siblings traumatised forever. My mom had to leave school and look after her siblings from her twelfth..it destroyed her life….. what for? And the same people who have taken the right to safe and legal abortions away, don’t want to do anything about gun safety? Please, please please……
This.
Exactly! How many have died from mass killings? How many children have to worry about being killed in their schools? Vote BLUE to save women's rights to choose. Vote Blue to save our children from being killed by military type weapons.
Apparently they only want to allow abortions AFTER the kid has left the womb. 😐
Abortion is murder, murder is not a right. Its no ones fault that your grandmother lost her life but her own as it was her choice to try a dangerous illegal procedure. That being said it still is horrible.
@@igorzisky Compassionate denial of existence to miserable beings who would otherwise suffer is right and proper.
How much pain would Ethan Crumbly's victims and parents be spared if they'd only have the courage to do the right thing?
It’s never been about protecting life. But punishing women.
Yeah that's your viewpoint figures left
@tedlewis309 Why does it bother you so much when it doesn't concern you in any way, shape, or form.🤔🤔🤨
Of course they don't care about fetuses or zygotes, or embryos. It is all about controlling women for men's benefit. Always has been, always will be. To prioritize a fetus or zygote or embryo over a woman is insane. Period.
@vickialway6433 Wow. Really? Maybe because killing humans concerns concerned humans.
Lie. You love that infant blood. You are depraved - truly
When do we charge these judges and legislators for practicing medicine without a license?!
This is a ridiculous statement, but you already knew that.
The laws are meant for the general population. Not the rich or the government. This is how you can have a political candidate have a woman get an abortion to protect his assets while at once campaigning against it.
The police literally run down people in stolen cars with police cruisers with "Seized Vehicle" decals in the side.
The government basically legalizes profitable criminality for itself while outlawing it for everyone else.
@@edwardfala7723It's not ridiculous in a third world country.
Right after you charge Health insurance companies, they make health care decisions every day, without seeing the patient in person.
Do you vote?
We in Holland wonder if these people are pro life why don't they first take care of the thousands homeless children in the USA, or does these kids don't matter ?
once a child is born they honestly could't care less.
It’s forced birth, not pro-life.
Because you can't use logic with these people. They're not interested in that baby/child. They're interested in controlling women. Trying to take women back to a time when they were viewed as less than individuals. Couldn't vote,own land,have their own bank accounts. The repuklicans don't want women to think for themselves, have jobs,etc. They want a man to control them,and everything.
It has nothing to do with kids. It's all about making women into nothing more than walking incubators. It's solely to take agency away from women.
Hatred of women is the national sport in the US.
This isn't about abortion per se, it's about the deeper issue of men and religious interests controlling women, the "Christian family" and reproduction. It certainly is not about being "pro life".
I believe that JChrist himself would be marching Pro Choice...
no its about killing a viable life now
@@helenbodel3974 don't believe in him but i don't think he would if he was real lol
The republican party does not care what people do. This is an active move to gain pro life votes. VOTES ALONE..
@@ykcirnhoj2225 your messages says it all. You don't know anything about it.
Notice how people called it like they saw it, then? Anti-abortion not pro life.
mifepristone
aka Zyklon B:aby
*and joy reid is helping the uniparty,keep her kind,under 15%
Anti-abortion because they are pro-life. It's not that hard to figure out whether you agree with the position or not.
@@zarbins They were/are so pro-life that they bombed clinics and killed Dr's.
What a way to support pro-life. 🤔🤔🙄
EXACTLY. Language matters. Words matter.
@@zarbins Allowing mothers to die from Ectopic Pregnancies which are completely non-viable is not pro life. Your are literally killing people WHO WANT TO HAVE KIDS. That is how stupid the Right Wing complete ban position is. If you have a messed up embryo in South or Conservative State it is almost a Death Sentence. What is Pro Life about that exactly? Republicans have gone complete brain dead. Can't even discuss issues with nuance. Literally killing people who want families.
Given the violent history, it is appalling that protesting at clinics is still allowable. It's one thing to voice your opposition to policies. It is quite another to obstruct, intimidate, and threaten people who are accessing legally allowable health care. It is also a violation of their privacy.
The right wing is unhinged. Vote them out in November or we can expect more rights to make decisions about our own bodies to be taken away.
😂😂😂
You can't dispute this fact that with abortion killing 600,000 babies a year abortion has killed more than the holocaust.
This is about more than abortion. They want to control every aspect of our lives that doesn't conform to their religious beliefs.
What is a woman?
So the argument that I hear is this. Democrats claim abortion is not a form of murder.
However, when they defend their position on abortion, they accuse Republicans, who think abortion is murder, of being hypocrites, because they support the death penalty
If it's not murder, then you shouldn't be comparing it with the death penalty… That sounds more like you're admitting that abortion is murder
"Abortion is not murder, but I'm gonna compare it to the death penalty when I accuse Republicans of being hypocrites…
Abortion should be a personal choice between a woman and her doctor.
like covid vaccine
@@ykcirnhoj2225 there is a bit of a difference. Having an abortion affects only the pregnancy and no one else…not being vaccinated for a deadly disease ( _any_ deadly disease) can, and often does, affect others. I don’t care if someone refuses to take the Covid vaccine unless their place of employment demands that their employees do so.
@@beverly719 if a vaccine works how does it effect others so your employer has rights over your body but if you want a termination of late stage pregnancy is not the business of the father lol ok
@@beverly719 There is a bit of a difference. Killing an unborn baby affects the life that was ended due to murder. People's decision to not take a shot of some unknown new experiment does not affect others.
@@stevenalexander4721 abortion is not murder.
What should scare anyone that cares about access to this drug and other birth control pills is that if you know who gets into power, he could potentially appoint the next head of the FDA.
Good! The FDA is a joke!
Buy the Canadian / French one and save it for a rainy day.
Look at all of Biden's DEI hires? Hmm?
thats not the point. and whos to say you wouldnt got to prision for that. if these nut jobs had their way no holds barred posessing that pill would probably get you convicted of attemted murder. lets not forget the slippery slope. @@AllDogsAreGoodDogs
Roe was passed the year I graduated in 1973! Never in a million years did I think it would be taken away. I remember the bombing of abortion clinics. Bombs delivered to providers. Very scary times. This is insanity!
Fascists never sleep. They stated plainly exactly what they wanted to do for years.
Roe v Wade was never a law. It was just a court case.
I've always had a hard time understanding why the US has abortion clinics as seperate healthcare institutions. In Denmark abortion is done at a hospital, same as any other medical procedure. It seems like separating women's healthcare from all other healthcare is a deliberate choice, so patients and staff can be singled out and targeted for harrassment.
In the UK, at one time, the waiting time for an abortion on the NHS (state health care that most people use most of the time) is often too long so women have to go to private abortion clinics. I'm hoping that the introduction of medication has reduced those waiting times.
@@nlwilson4892 Wouldn't that be a problem of the NHS having too few resources? Wouldn't a better solution be more resources to the NHS rather than private abortion clinics?
@@quietreason8679Yes, the problem was a lack of resources. Yes, it would be better if the government had provided more resources for the NHS. But because they didn't, people had to go to private clinics, for some you had to pay but others were run by charities.
In the US a large number of hospitals are Catholic run and those hospitals refuse to do anything abortion related. A woman seeking abortion because she was miscarrying was turned away several times from a Catholic hospital in Bellingham WA. During her fourth visit the doctors told her she was developing sepsis and the doctor was made to wait three hours while she made the case to the hospital ethics board to save her life.
My daughter goes to college in Bellingham and it fills me with terror that she could be turned away with a life threatening medical condition.
The Hand Maids tale is becoming reality for America's women.
Erin Hawley made a total fool out of herself in front of SCOTUS. It was a joy to witness.
If your religious convictions hinders you from doing your job. Go find a different job
Or a different religion!
A friend of a friend was trying to go to Planned Parenthood for care for cervical cancer and was jumped on her way in. Years sgo.
Shameless thugs.
As a former clinic defender, I remember those frightening days.
We need allies that benefit from FDA approved medications to step up along with those that benefit from IVF to defend safe abortion pills.
Did the babies get a choice?
@@neal5068After birth
@@nolwino keep telling yourself you're not killing babies
@@neal5068The fetus is medically incapable of thinking at that stage.
@@neal5068A fetus is a parasite, NOT a baby. Women are born human beings.
Unbelievably sad 😞- falling back to the Middle Ages.
If one good thing has come out of this post-Roe era, it's that we're not shy about saying the word "abortion" anymore. Because we never should have been in the first place
They aren't pro life they are anti choice.
And you support baby killers
When people say they are pro life, doesn't that also include the mother's life? Really tired of people trying to playcGod.
hey, just let people do what they want to when they are adults. everything else is dumb!
At this point a Woman is not valid? Its her body? This is scary😢
There is NOTHING TO DISCUSS!! Why is this even being discussed?!?! Why are we not discussing what men can or cannot do with their body????
Would you abort a puppies or kittens in the womb?
Quit spreading your legs 🍗😡
Are you familiar with the draft and conscripted service?
A fertilized egg is not a baby. Why do you hate women so much?
@@ValleyoftheRogue quit spreading your legs
Great show Joy! Thank you for covering this critical issue with facts and science.
The separation of church and state is crumbling. Start bringing up the T(ax) word and lets see how many religious hard liners double down or back off.
This is something that AMERICA had settled in the 90's. In most states, clinic's would perform a Safe & Legal abortion up to 12/16 weeks. For whatever reason, it was a LEGAL Procedure.
This is quite worrisome!!
People need to stay out of grown folks business.
Clearly you’re unfamiliar with how a civilization operates.
@@John-jz7zz civilazation will operate just fine. it's not your business nor mine to tell women what to do with their bodies and they should decide for themselves. leave your personal and religious beliefs out of it!
@@tomtom8786 first, religion has nothing to do with this. Unless you’re referring to the progressive cult that you subscribe to.
Second, who has a legitimate right to decide what happens to the child’s body? And why?
@@John-jz7zzReligion has everything to do with it.
The entire anti-abortion ideology is religious.
It’s a venture organized and sponsored by politicized religious groups.
@@John-jz7zz An embryo is a person only in a religious context, not in science.
If the Supreme Court wishes to hand Biden this election on a silver platter I invite them to ban the pill !!!!
No it's not Biden it's Obama and Clinton at least get honest about it.. they selected brain dead because he'd be the easiest one to control and of course with Kamala kackling Kamala
Abortion is healthcare plain and simple lawmakers have no business butting into medical decisions!
Vote 💙
Taking a cordless Dyson to your irresponsible behavior is not healthcare😅
Talking about crimes
Outhere how many
Thousands criminals
Women’s on the loose
😱😱😱😱😱😱😱
@@sircasm6578
Yes it absolutely is healthcare.
NO ONE should be butting into the healthcare decisions of a pregnant person. I'd widen your statement from "politicians" to include all the damned busybodies that think they have the right to an opinion about someone else's healthcare choices.
@sassysaint3096 no it's not
This is about male superiority. Joy is right.
Doctors who don't want to perform abortions because it is against their conscience don't have to.
Why should doctors whose consciences dictate they not turn patients away be denied the same validity? Why should they be prevented by law from following THEIR consciences when a proven treatment is available?
Only a particular sector of doctors are being allowed to practice according to their conscience. The rest are being forced to abandon their patients against their consciences.
How is this justifiable?
Why woud a dr who doesnt want to perform abortions work at an abortion clinic...i swear you ppl have no crital thinking skills
if your conscience has religious infringement, do not become a doctor. Go preach somewhere , you have no place in a hospital.
Abortion is legal in my country . A couple of years ago a case went viral ... a young lady died in the hospital . She was misscarrieing , but not quick enough, so she needed emergency abortion to stop her from bleeding out. The doctour said it was against his religion to perform the abortion (MUSLIM- if you are wandering ...)
The nurses said the husband cried in his knees on the hallways , BEGGING the doctour to save his wife....He refused.
She DIED.
...there were criminal charges against the doctour ....but would you like to be that husband ?
Love to see Rachel Maddow on other Msnbc shows or anywhere.
She is on target about the legality of the pill
Women need to demand that ED medicine be taken off the market.
Laziness should never be an excuse for abortion. I'm healthy doctor I'm just to lazy to raise a child and to selfish to let someone else do it and way too ignorant to let the dad do it.
The fear I have for my 10 and 12 yr old granddaughter's is so overwhelming ...
In May I will be 70yrs old and I pray I live long enough to see their rights as woman protected forever ..
I was married in Dec. 1971....
I was 21 when I was blessed with my first child ...
Fun fact his birthday is JANUARY 22, 1976
Exactly three years to the day after
Roe v. Wade .....
It's scary to think that only 3 yrs protected what could have been a different decision on my part ...
PLEASE LEAVE WOMAN'S BODIES ALONE !!
ALWAYS VOTE BLUE 💙🇺🇸💙🇺🇸💙🇺🇸💙
lol so funny
The economic situation is a big key to the situation from the 80s and now.
Inequality brings out the worst in people
I like that she called them the terrorists that they are
We had idiots protesting against the abortion pill today out in front of the CVS near us.
Do you know that because you work at the CVS?
The country is broken..
Due to Systemic🦧JoyReidism
Blks,beware
Joy Reid is the pupppet of Margaret Sanger
A simple test...
Imagine that you are in your mother's womb and you hear 2 people talking to your mother.
One is telling her that she has her right to her body, abort if wish. The other is telling your mother don't abort, give your baby a chance and I promise that when your is born he/she will someday look in eyes and say "I LOVE YOU"..
Which person Do you want your mother to listen to?
@@YUMLiberalTears No, your Mom told me while she was making me breakfast this morning.
These crazy “doctors” should keep their religious beliefs to themselves. I don’t want them making decisions about my body.
It seems as though SCOTUS is taking the right to actually "Make" law... when their job is only to interpret the law...
The job of making law falls only to the house not scotus...
If this drug is pulled it is going to put even more of a strain on abortion clinics in states that permit it. Because procedural abortions take way more time and resources. The ripple effect would be big and beyond peoples access to the drug itself. Basically states that don’t permit will be getting their way even more because the states that do won’t be able to manage the need.
when will scotUS introduce American burkas?
Bonnets is the Christian version.
Racist much?
@@charlesmartin1121 what's the christian version of public executions?
@@carrot595
They were called hanging trees.
Get OUT and VOTE straight ticket 🩵 💙 🩵 💙 🩵 💙 Pro-Democracy and Pro-Choice 👍 💙 🇺🇸 🗽
Anti-abortion and terrorism go hand in hand.
Says someone that wants babies killed in the womb
Then why don't you go to Gaza and protest with them? Let us know how it works out for you.
This type of thinking shows how sick you are
@@YUMLiberalTears make this make sense.
TRUMP 2024,2028 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸
Let's talk about the abortions committed in Uvalde through preservation of the 2nd amendment; the conservative clap trap of women aborting after birth falls on its face.
Louisiana has the highest prison population per capita, uncontrollable crime, the electric chair and leathal injection. They can't jail or execute people fast enough to maintain safety.
Less life might just help out in a situation like that.
Do not call them abortion clinics. Other services are provided.
So the proper way to handle these doctors is to require them to give a referral to another doctor if they aren't willing to do the procedure. I can get behind them not being forced to perform abortions, or ANY procedure they're not comfortable with. You can't get birth control from catholic hospitals. It's always been that way. When my dad worked for one, he'd just tell his patients where they could get them at low or no cost. He wouldn't have performed an abortion but he would have told his patients there are other doctors that they can work with if they need care he can't provide... And probably also try to convince them to try a different route. He's anti choice, but he's not a complete jerk.
Great job Joy. I don't get this abortion debate. How is it my business to tell a woman what to do during her pregnancy?
Missed the benefit of mifepristone allowing many women to not have to undergo an medical procedure which is physically unpleasant and has more serious side effects than a pill!
Not having Standing hasn't stopped the current Supreme Court recently.
The 80's? Try living thru the 60's and 70's when women aborted themselves risking death
Why is #3 even a question? 1A isn't just freedom to practice religion, *it's also freedom FROM religion,* which means constitutionally you can't force your religious beliefs on others. Your religion says you can't have an abortion? Cool, then don't. But you don't get to tell someone else *_they_* can't have an abortion because of your religious views.
The supreme court dare not ban this drug after they lost all their credibility after roe v wade
They made the correct decision in dobbs. The activism and mental gymnastics of the roe decision were awful.
credibility to who? you? just go back to dropping fries at the back of your McDonald's job. and leave legal decisions to people who know what they are talking about.
@@thedragon2148Yeah, but those decisions are MEDICAL, not legal. Are SCOTUS licensed medical doctors?
Most non-activist constitutional scholars do not think the supreme court lost any credibility after roe v wade. I've even heard liberals talk about how poorly formulated Roe v. Wade was and it passed due to SC activist fiat and was not in alignment with anything even the most progressive Europe had passed. What's more telling is 3 democratic presidents (Clinton, Obama, and Biden) had the opportunity to codify Roe v Wade into law and did not.
"In a speech Obama gave to Planned Parenthood Action Fund on July 17, 2007, the then-presidential candidate said, “The first thing I’d do as president is sign the Freedom of Choice Act.” He referenced it again in 2008, on the 35th Anniversary of Roe v. Wade."
You should be asking yourself why they always promised to do this and never delivered. The answer is quote horrifying.
@@thedragon2148 It's a fact.check it out.people have no faith in the supreme court.maybe you should just keep collecting your food stamps and stop pretending you have anything meaningful to say
I'm in my 70's. It's sad that my family didn't want to fight for reproductive freedom. Now it's gone for my grand and great grands. It's their fight now. I'm disgustedly done! If they want it they can fight for it like I did.
The same arguments against abortion were the same arguments against slavery.
Slavery is comprised of two principal components - forced labour and forced marriage. Both refer to situations of exploitation that a person cannot refuse or cannot leave because of threats, violence, coercion, deception, or abuse of power.
Forcing women to carry unwanted pregnancies against their will and forcing women to give birth against their will is reproductive slavery.
In fact, slave owners forced female slaves to give birth against their will before slavery was abolished.
Nailed it.@@TheseusAthena
Simple question -- did slave women have any reproductive choice?
No. They were used as breeding cattle.
Forced breeding, forced birth, and denial of healthcare is what you want? THEN YOU WOULD HAVE LOVED SLAVERY.
Congrats.
Stop trying to conflate issues, it shows you don't have a good argument for being in favor of abortion.
Slave women ALSO had no reproductive freedom.
They were actually experimented on without their consent.
Maybe take a second or two to think about the comparison you're trying to make.
If a Doctor disagrees with the use of a medication on a personal level, then they can refuse to prescribe it. Or just not see women, if they think it is dangerous then present evidence, to the relevant authorities (FDA), to go and conduct further research and consultation in America and worldwide. Then a medical/ scientific determination and or new advisory advice on the use of the drug.
There is no freakin reason that a decision on this case needs to wait til June. Do it NOW SCOTUS!
It is a state issue, not federal.
@@debbiepeterson3774The nationwide injunction against Mifepristone was issued by a Texas Judge on the 5th Circuit. The 5th Circuit is a Federal Court.
Great coverage, Joy!
Underground railroad of pills coming to a town near you .
Red or Blue?
@@Sag301purple
@@Sag301 rainbow.
I witnessed this firsthand and it was scary to watch!
If abortion is banned in US, Canada and New Mexico can setup many abortion clinics.
Abortion isn't banned, and New Mexico is in the US. And people like you ade allowed to vote.
When did New Mexico become a country???
I hate everyone who stayed home or voted for Trump in 2016.
Elections should not be fought over gas prices but on America's future.
Cheap available energy is Americas future
@@christopherjavens3438
It’s not.
Liberty is.
There is nothing more important than liberty.
“Pro Life” murderers.
I wonder if this lower court ruling is upheld, would that give anti-vaxers a precedent, to ban vaccinations?
For sure.
Anyone would be able to sue FDA for any medication they don’t like.
VOTE LIKE GOD IS WATCHING
BECAUSE HE IS
I’m a straight white male that is pro abortion. I’m personally responsible for three, that I know of….
stuff happens.
It was a fishing expedition for which reason the scotus requires.
Gas gaza inflation wont determine my vote. Country first Trump last 🤓🤓
We don't know you no more
well said. the lesson here... stop messing around with women's bodies already !!!!!
🙏💙💙💙👍🌏😇
Why would anyone believe anything Joy Reid says ?
Hmm, I don't know, maybe remembering the news coverage of what was happening in the 80s and the well documented evidence of the drug being invented and eventually introduced into the US.
I wish the conversation wasn't cut off with Joy Reid and Rachel Maddow.
Why is this woman appropriating Trumps hair?
President Trump's hair's better than his, come on 💈
Usa state system is falling apart. On one hand its let the states decide and
What is frightening is MSNBC
It is time to go after Viagra.
Come on. Show the clip of Kamala clapping in Puerto Rico. I dare ya.
Dark Kamala loves your support!! xx
You don't have a clue, any person born in Puerto Rico is a "National Born Citizen" of the United States, they can't vote because of where they live, not because of who they are.
@@richietattersall2122 nah. We all got reminded she isn’t liked and really stupid.
How long are we going to have to suffer through Ali Velshi’s over-excited spiel about the NEW MSNBC APP????!!!!!
This is what you talk about when you don't want to talk about djt stock hitting $71😅
You bought some shares, it sounds like. How many? Did you make a killing?
That won't last long.
He cant grift for 6 months.
@@Mathew-8896: He can’t sell that much of it. It was part of the merger agreement. He can’t sell large portions of his stock (because the price would drop) and he can’t use it as collateral for loans because if he can’t pay back the loan the banks would foreclose on it and sell it to get their money back (which would also cause the price to drop).
He’s essentially stuck with it for at least two years. He can sell small amounts of it though.
@@mikehersh6192 It the board ok's it he'll tank Truth social sooner. he won't be able to help himself.
The crazies and the money they paid to hassle woman
It feels good knowing my boy Trump just made billions 😂😂😂 TRUMP 2024,2028 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸
Yes sir
Are you aware U.S. Presidents can only hold office for two terms? Why would you write 2024, 2028? How would you react if Biden had campaign signs that read 2024, 2028? Hmmm....
U.S. Presidents can only run for two terms. Maybe read a book.
@@2kgrindtimeNo sir
And your still poor as dirt.
That cop at 1:09 chunking that forced birther protestor like he was luggage 🛄🧳
Are Cyanide pills legal?
Same concept
How sad! Why are you watching MSNBC? Fox needs you back!
Why would you want to ban a drug used for hypertensive crises?
@@jackiechristian-di6sy You use a coat hanger? How did you myrder your baby?
So you don’t understand the difference between a poison and a hormone blocker.
Then don’t opine on subjects that you don’t understand.
😊 . Wow, just wow
Guess what msnbc your not important anymore lol.
*you're
Say hello to Tucker for me.
As soon as Congress reconvenes, the first order of business is to repeal the Comstock Act. It doesn't matter which party controls the House-GET the GOP on the record regarding this statute that should have been completely repealed in the 1970s. Get the Republicans on the record on this issue, and then, if any of them support it, work to defeat them.
I want a legislator to propose a bill call the Impregnators Responsibility Bill. All impregnators must pay for the healthcare and prenatal care and birth of the resulting fetus. And the education and healthcare and upbringing of the resulting fetus until the age of 18. It can be proven by DNA. That would be pro life. 😂
You guys got rid of Cavanagh yet!? You know, the guy that hired "what's her name!" Fools all. Shame.
Why on earth did the SCOTUS even take the case. They did NOT have to take the case.
Corrupt.
Whyyyyy did they cut Rachel off
Christian teaching: Love one another.
Too bad they don't live up to that. There's no hate like Christian Love.
Alito: "Is the FDA infallible?"
Me: "Neither less nor more than this Court."
At least they try to have experts working on it. We know the courts and the Congress aren't.
The doctor should get out of being a doctor. make a living doing something else. Obviously, being a doctor goes against what they believe. I say get out .I personally don't want them to touch me. I would rather have someone who is not bias against me, or what I believe 😤
Honestly, they don't even need to stop being a doctor, they can just specialise in areas where this situation doesn't come up, geriatrics, pediatrics, orthopaedics etc.
If only religion was banned .......the world would be a much better place. Safer too.
@@texforister7023 Christianity is supposed to be a faith based religion right? There's only one problem, Christians.....HAVE NO FAITH NONE!! YOUR SCARED OF EVERYTHING!!!YOU NAME IT CHRISTIANS ARE SCARED OF IT. AND IF BY SOME MIRACLE THEY'RE NOT SCARED OF IT.......THEN THEY'RE ATTACKING IT.
I don't know why don't you ask trump he was there to see his chubby little boyfriend.
You can be charged child support for a child that can be legally aborted because it really isn’t alive yet, but it’s only considered alive if someone can fleece you for money for it.
Not till its born. Birth control is not the sole job of the woman. If you wore a rubber or had a vasectomy, nobody could make you pay for a thing. Men are such babies.
I find it funny that they think making something like this illegal will stop it. Gee, that worked when they made alcohol illegal. Hehe.