Great description of a very stylish and very functional modern motor . I know it's efficient for its HP rating is high because of it's low RPMs but I am wondering if it is enough power for a CH 801 ? It is such an unique motor and could really stand out on the proper air frame. On a CH 750 super duty it would look like a small Beaver . I will honestly say because of it's LOW RPMs and GREAT prop efficiency your motor really makes it a great contender for any slow flying aircraft....
Thank you Sam! Nice video overview of the 9S. I can think of many aircraft that would be a perfect match for it. I have enjoyed the vids you have done with Steve Wolf and his Samson Mite. He's a great promoter for Verner engine and hope to see more of them!
Talking about safety records comparing everything against a Rotec is a pure joke. A Rotec "engine" by itself is an engineering aberration as almost every single part has been designed by clueless "mechanical engineers". The best place where to fit a Rotec engine is on your living room using it as a table or on a marina using it as an anchor. No joke Here, Rotec are everything but not engines, even less for flying vehicles !
@@laurentvelati7565 😂 good point, sounds like they are the Subaru of the sky, maybe a Lycoming comparison would be more ideal for the Verner. At the end of the day we want to be home for dinner and not planted in the hedge row
@@MillerMachineWorks I don't know anything about Verners engines as I never opened or worked on one. I totally agree with you about being able to safely coming back home at the end of the day. In the case where you've ever fitted a Rotec engine on your plane, the only way to come back home safely is to stay on the ground for taxiing. The you will only need to clean all the oil that spilled from everywhere. A single flight of one hour using a Rotec burns/spills as much oïl than a ROTAX would burn in 2 or 3 years! That's all but not a joke...!
We have been developing a standard base collector ring option for the 9S. We have made a few now and generally will be able to customize some options to fit the installation.
Wow, does that prop rotation look WEIRD! I know it's due to the frame rate vs the engine speed, but I've never seen it THAT BAD on plane videos before.
Radial, not rotary. A radial has a fixed crankcase and the crankshaft turns, the prop is attached to the crankshaft. A rotary has a fixed crankshaft and the whole engine turns, the prop is attached to the crankcase.
You had me at "Honda heads." Yes, I know they're from an industrial engine and not a Honda car......but still. HONDA. I want one of these engines. Even if I just run it in my driveway on a stand. I'm curious, though. Where did the fuel injection go? Too expensive? Unreliable? Just wondering.
Great description of a very stylish and very functional modern motor . I know it's efficient for its HP rating is high because of it's low RPMs but I am wondering if it is enough power for a CH 801 ? It is such an unique motor and could really stand out on the proper air frame. On a CH 750 super duty it would look like a small Beaver . I will honestly say because of it's LOW RPMs and GREAT prop efficiency your motor really makes it a great contender for any slow flying aircraft....
Thank you Sam! Nice video overview of the 9S. I can think of many aircraft that would be a perfect match for it. I have enjoyed the vids you have done with Steve Wolf and his Samson Mite. He's a great promoter for Verner engine and hope to see more of them!
A high-tech radial. Just when you thought they couldn't improve on a great, existing design.
What is the fuel consumption per hour on cruising settings? I'd say on 50% and 75% for example.
Hi, we are wanting a 7 cylinder Verner. Cold you do an overview for the 7? can the 7 be used with a throttle body? Rotec throttle body?
Look like a well made engine.
How is the safety record vs the rotec, seems they have plenty of QC issues. It's hard to find as many people flying verners online with issues
Talking about safety records comparing everything against a Rotec is a pure joke.
A Rotec "engine" by itself is an engineering aberration as almost every single part has been designed by clueless "mechanical engineers".
The best place where to fit a Rotec engine is on your living room using it as a table or on a marina using it as an anchor.
No joke Here, Rotec are everything but not engines, even less for flying vehicles !
@@laurentvelati7565 😂 good point, sounds like they are the Subaru of the sky, maybe a Lycoming comparison would be more ideal for the Verner. At the end of the day we want to be home for dinner and not planted in the hedge row
@@MillerMachineWorks
I don't know anything about Verners engines as I never opened or worked on one.
I totally agree with you about being able to safely coming back home at the end of the day.
In the case where you've ever fitted a Rotec engine on your plane, the only way to come back home safely is to stay on the ground for taxiing.
The you will only need to clean all the oil that spilled from everywhere.
A single flight of one hour using a Rotec burns/spills as much oïl than a ROTAX would burn in 2 or 3 years!
That's all but not a joke...!
Who makes the engine mount?
Only downside it the very low oil savage oil tank. Other then that nice engine!
I want one....now what do I
Build for it...WW 1. Or....?
How does it get it's fuel / air mixture ?
Fuel injection throttle body
That would be cool in a scaled down staggering beach 2 seat home built with a tad more hp
Do you mean staggerWING?
Where do you get an exhaust for it?
I would imagine that since each aircraft is unique that exhaust manifolds would have to be custom fabricated
We have been developing a standard base collector ring option for the 9S. We have made a few now and generally will be able to customize some options to fit the installation.
Wow, does that prop rotation look WEIRD! I know it's due to the frame rate vs the engine speed, but I've never seen it THAT BAD on plane videos before.
Just say it. The best rotary modern days. Ain’t it. ?? Cech tech. The best. .., Yes sir
Radial, not rotary. A radial has a fixed crankcase and the crankshaft turns, the prop is attached to the crankshaft. A rotary has a fixed crankshaft and the whole engine turns, the prop is attached to the crankcase.
You had me at "Honda heads." Yes, I know they're from an industrial engine and not a Honda car......but still. HONDA.
I want one of these engines. Even if I just run it in my driveway on a stand. I'm curious, though. Where did the fuel injection go? Too expensive? Unreliable? Just wondering.