"Does Modern Science Support Religion?" - Sayed Mohammad Baqer Qazwini
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 พ.ค. 2019
- Ramadan 2019 - "Does Modern Science Support Religion?" - Sayed Mohammad Baqer Qazwini
Night 7 - Ramadan 2019 - 1440 at the Ahlul Bayt Center of Toledo
I'm Sunni but i love the teachings of Sayed Mohammad Baqer Qazwini.💗
I'm from Bangladesh🇧🇩
Jazakallah khair to the Sayed and to the person who uploaded this video, it has really helped my essay.
Marhaba
Subhanallah wa behamdeh
May Allah Almighty bless you.
Very interesting and enlightening speeech.
08:35 No the mountains don't stabilize the crust, the crust stabilizes itself.
I like this man because He interpretate the Quran with understanding - logic and knowledge all 3 combined
If the quran is the word of god, why does it need any human interpretation? Isn't god capable of saying what it means and meaning what it says?
@@JoeHarkinsHimself interpretation is to understand the Quran better but you still can understand Quran without interpretation. The same thing goes to any book.
@@ali-ej2yf The issue is not the value or purpose of interpretation of "any book." We are not talking abput "any book" are we? Your comment is an attempted avoidance o the issue I have raised. Please look again and answer.
The quran is allegely the prefect, unchanging word of the perfect, unchanging god, isn't it? It says what it says. This god says what it means and means what it says, doesn't it?
If that is true, who is qualified to interpret or explain the meaning of anything in the quran? Why does anything in the quran need interpretation?
@@JoeHarkinsHimself I just gave you the answer. Interpretation means explaining the detail of a verse that you can't understand at the first glance. It doesn't "add" anything to the meaning it just explains more. So it had nothing to do with the perfectness of Quran. In fact it even proves Quran is perfect because if a book is full of nonsense it won't need any interpretation but since Quran is full of wisdom you can interpret so many wise points from it.
@@ali-ej2yf congratulations on your amazing mental gymnastics. Ordinary books are not perfect , therefore they need no interpretation, but a prefect book does. Simply amazing.
OK, so if the quran say one thing, it can mean something else, not what it says. According to your logic, the perfection of the quran lies in it's potential to be interpreted to mean whatever you want it to mean. What it actually says has nothing to do with what it means.
That explains a lot. None of the very explicit errors in the quran mean what they say. They can be interpreted so they are not mistakes. Problem solved. Good job.
U r easy to undrstnd
05:15 ... Water... It's not hard to make an observation in the world and come to the conclusion that water is important for anything to thrive... This is NOT an amazing thing to find in any book...
Dear Sayed,
Also in the Fleat Earth, you can have multiple wests and easts. And this doesn't going against the Holy Quran
Good question. But an even more incisive question (to which I doubt anyone will give an honest answer) is, do you have scientifically verifiable evidence for the the existence of a god?
The honest answer is why would a god who created the scientific laws of this universe then subject itself to these laws it created for us to live by. Do you honestly expect to subjugate this eternal infinite being to a piece of evidence from some science it is not even bounded to? Science explain our universe. We believe in something beyond this universe in which the laws of this universe cease to exist. We cant even show or comprehend infinity scientifically but you believe in it as a concept correct? But when it comes to an eternal infinite being, you cant confine it to the finite mind so you choose not to believe it. See the double standard?
@@murtazazaidi6282 Thank you for fulfilling my predication. An honest yes or no would have been a surprise.
And, of course, you are confirming - even though you are unable to actually say it out loud - that you have zero scientific evidence for the existence of a god.
@@JoeHarkinsHimself I will say flat out no but I gave the reason why it is illogical to even ask for scientific evidence to begin with. You want to apply the laws of this universe to something outside of it. You are asking to push these laws outside of their functioning boundaries. Is that scientifically valid? If you can comprehend infinity or use science to show infinity, then you have a point to make.
@@murtazazaidi6282 you say, "You want to apply the laws of this universe to something outside of it."
Actually, I'm not. I'm not claiming there is anything "outside." Your are not only claiming the existence of a god for which you have no verifiable evidence, you are now doubling down to claim there is an "outside."
What evidence do you have that there is an "outside?"
@@JoeHarkinsHimself Again, i cant use this universe to show another. Can you answer my question?
I hope he isn't another Zakir Naik
Science is young where math has matured. Religion is in the air. Can we start with your head piece.
19:30 Humans are related to pigs - And yes theory of evolution contradicts the creation myth in the Quran, you can't both have the standing model of the theory of evolution, that shows that all life on earth evolved from single celled organisms.. and then having a creator sculpting Adam from clay...
I'm sorry but it just clashes, and it clashes hard.. You can call it confusion, but in reality it's the opposite.. Humans have invented over 9000 gods, Allah is no exception.. It's man made.. We can be good people without any god beliefs.. I can..
Im sorry but it really doesn't clash. We shia believe that humanoids were on Earth before Adam was placed on Earth and Adam was the first of modern humanity. Sure we share 90% of DNA with cats as well but how does that disprove our point? Will evolution explain why primates did not start farming or cultivating 100,000+ years ago given how long the evolutionary process was? Adam was placed on Earth 12,000 years ago and was told by God to farm. Guess how far back the origins of farming goes. 12,000 years. Sorry... no clashes.
@@murtazazaidi6282 You can say the same for electricity... Why didn't we use electricity 100.000+ years ago. Why not 1000 years ago even? why not 500 years ago? Your argument defeats itself, it's called human ingenuity, thing's take time.
@@an9l1c1sm6 Farming was invented whereas electricity was discovered. Not sure if its a good comparison. So why the sudden burst in human ingenuity only recently and rapidly after millions of years of evolving? Most of our advancements happened in the last few millennium. Electricity is one of many examples that were introduced during this timeframe. I've put historical and quranic text together to show that they align.
@@murtazazaidi6282 Dude, harnessing plants and harnessing electricity... You can't just call one thing an invention and another thing a discovery... Aren't they exactly the same?
Don't you think it has more to do with culture and societies than it has to do with evolution? Pursuit of knowledge.. Breakthroughs by geniuses..
@@murtazazaidi6282 search for this and read the article:
"Why Has 99 Percent of the Technological Progress by Modern Humans Come in the Last 10,000 Years?"
Then we'll get into that robe your wearing that caused hells doors on greenfield in dearborn to open.
_Spread the word or donate to help brothers in need by googling and visiting "wf aid"
$10 to feed a school child for a month,
$15 to spread the warmth by providing blankets, $210 to dig a well (as sadaqah jariyah ) to you or beloved one, and more.