Jackal 3 boasts increased capabilities and greater soldier protection

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ต.ค. 2024
  • By summer 2024 the first batch of 70 new High Mobility Transporter (HMT) Jackal 3 vehicles will be produced for the British Army by Babcock International Group and Supacat.
    Jackal 3 is the latest iteration of the HMT product line, incorporating modernised capabilities such as a new suspension for improved off-road performance.
    Forces News has taken a look at what we can expect from this much-anticipated new variant, with a total of 240 vehicles expected to eventually be built for the Armed Forces.
    More: www.forces.net...
    #forcesnews #military #army #vehicles #weapons #technology
    Subscribe to Forces News: bit.ly/1OraazC
    Check out our website: www.forces.net/
    Facebook: / forcestv
    Instagram: www.instagram....
    X: / forcesnews

ความคิดเห็น • 291

  • @tomstravels520
    @tomstravels520 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +132

    More environmental protection=we added a windscreen

    • @TheBooban
      @TheBooban 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      It keeps the heat in the cab…

    • @garrywynne1218
      @garrywynne1218 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      😂😂😂

    • @IPC0101
      @IPC0101 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      It seems a hopeless vehicle in the age of drones, more wasted defence spending

    • @darrylstark9259
      @darrylstark9259 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      It's more than it had previously. Jackal 4 will come with a crew deployed umbrella.

    • @garrywynne1218
      @garrywynne1218 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@darrylstark9259 - i heard it will have a mezzanine floor and greenhouse? Very useful in NE Europe . Apparently 🤷🏻🤣

  • @jonathanwheeler4767
    @jonathanwheeler4767 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +86

    a wind screen to keep the heat in the CAB? Has he been in an open top for any length of time?

    • @impguardwarhamer
      @impguardwarhamer 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Yeh, the windshield is certainly much better than nothing but they probably need to build a proper cab for european climates

    • @Ben_From_Marketing
      @Ben_From_Marketing 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      If they put a roof on it and side windows it would compromise the Army's ability to ensure troops are adequately soaked from the rain when deployed and as we all know the Army could never allow troops to be comfortable, even in the middle east they made sure you were soaked in sweat with all that gear on

    • @Surv1ve_Thrive
      @Surv1ve_Thrive 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@Ben_From_Marketing the troops could be trained to make themselves extremely uncomfortable in the vehicle. Don't worry. 🙂

    • @Merciless_Banana
      @Merciless_Banana 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@Surv1ve_Thrive we are trained to make ourselves comfortable in a vehicle like this.

    • @Surv1ve_Thrive
      @Surv1ve_Thrive 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @MrPaul84279 I know I was just joking with a previous poster. I know the users make the best of it, seen them. Also recce teams used open top Landies before, jeeps before that etc.

  • @henrybinns8745
    @henrybinns8745 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    Less lethal, offers less protection, and more expensive that the JLTV or similar vehicle within this class across Europe…. Great British design and MOD acquisition at its finest. Utter pants!

  • @adriel115_
    @adriel115_ 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    drones will have a field day with this

    • @mrtp4422
      @mrtp4422 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Drones destroy tanks, armoured cars etc. Nothing is completely safe in war.

  • @Jeffybonbon
    @Jeffybonbon 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    but do we have the troops to use them

    • @davidty2006
      @davidty2006 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes.
      Theres atleast a few idiots who can drive.

  • @HowardWebb_ceo_of_fraud_VAR115
    @HowardWebb_ceo_of_fraud_VAR115 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    That windscreen will keep the heat in for sure wtf 😂

  • @latch9781
    @latch9781 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    I'm impressed. I didn't think they could make the Jackal more top heavy

    • @MrFlipcas
      @MrFlipcas 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Double decker buses manage fine 😂

  • @LeonardTavast
    @LeonardTavast 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    It's so odd. It's a weird blend between an UTV and a MRAP. It's like the designers didn't know if they wanted to protect the crew or not. I think they should've made a proper MRAP.

    • @jeason4819
      @jeason4819 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They do have an mrap in the foxhound , it's just a shame they didn't make one with a proper ring to mount weapons on

    • @sosayweall7290
      @sosayweall7290 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jeason4819 the same Foxhound that’s due to leave service by 2030 with no obvious replacement.

    • @carwyngriffiths
      @carwyngriffiths 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s a light reconnaissance vehicle, however can also act in a fire support role.

  • @darrylstevens1854
    @darrylstevens1854 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Should be named the Joker or Joke for short. Easy pickens for drones or snipers for the lounging soldiers on the outdoor deck

  • @Andyb2379
    @Andyb2379 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Right to battle in a convertible.

    • @davidty2006
      @davidty2006 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      saay how much more gun can we put on this thing?

    • @CastleHassall
      @CastleHassall 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@davidty2006Well, one would be a good start.. but i think the procurement people think guns are unessessary and might alarm people and be a health and safety risk so best not put any on the vehicles

  • @michaelwhite9199
    @michaelwhite9199 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    FPV drones are going to love those.

  • @kirkjones4105
    @kirkjones4105 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    And we're supposed to feel confident that our Son's and Daughter's are being given the best protective equipment they can get. It's a joke. Drones, snipers will have a turkey shoot. God forbid you take these into an urban environment on patrol. I think we got fleeced on this one.

    • @toekneekerching9543
      @toekneekerching9543 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      yep, this is the vehicle we needed 20 years ago for Iraq/Afghanistan, not today for a possible war in Europe. Typical of our leadership, always behind the times.

  • @nickbannister775
    @nickbannister775 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Many years ago I was involved in turning Rhodesia into Zimbabwe, the vehicles and adaptions the Rhodesian Army did to their vehicles to fight the internal wars were years ahead of their time. Today’s armoured vehicle designers need to go back to those times and look at those vehicles and think if it worked for them let’s update it for ourselves.

    • @joe71682
      @joe71682 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Oh please tell us more, I need to hear how the brilliant colonizers brought civilization into the darkness, and how only the white man can lead the way into the future.

    • @MrSatyre1
      @MrSatyre1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@joe71682Non sequitur much, snowflake?

    • @KommandantGSR
      @KommandantGSR 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@joe71682 the man was just mentioning about how the designs are ass and needs to be reconsidered from previous wars that had shittier vehicles was way better improved than modern vehicles

    • @Hope-dp8qz
      @Hope-dp8qz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@KommandantGSR the old Rhodesian puma's will be turned to scrap in modern combat.

    • @richardm7004
      @richardm7004 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@joe71682 Alternatively, let me tell you how the one party state of Zimbabwe cast darkness over civilisation.

  • @whya2ndaccount
    @whya2ndaccount 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    This is another repeat.
    A good vehicle for a past conflict. Not suitable for a near peer high tempo adversary. Passengers "protection" = their body armour and I suspect the windscreen wont stop a 125mm round or an ATGM, let alone blast and frag from a 152mm HE round.

    • @talkerbill1
      @talkerbill1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      100% Agree.

  • @paulhill1665
    @paulhill1665 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I know quite a few people involved with the military, front line soldiers, their consensus is that they like the Jackal.

    • @CastleHassall
      @CastleHassall 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      REALLY???? that is highly unlikely, for starters it looks so top heavy that it would roll in big embankenents.. also a very high up highly visible vehicle..
      you do know the Russians aren't insurgent type of force right?
      this type of vehicle would get wiped out so fast in a real war it would be a deathtrap
      procurement are stuck in a counter insurgency mindset when it's real war they are sending guys to

  • @pgw1977
    @pgw1977 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    What a waste of money, and potentially soldier’s lives. I’m sure they will all feel safe when driving it around Salisbury Plain.
    Great, sloping windows to keep the heat in, I’m sure that has minimal effect.
    No roof! So when it’s freezing sleet / rain I’m sure the driver / passenger are going to be less than comfortably concentrating on the task at hand.
    This guy saying ‘there’s improved enviromental protection for the soldiers’ yes let ‘em have the wind , rain and snow in the vehicle with them!

  • @toekneekerching9543
    @toekneekerching9543 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    how does a windshield keep the "cab" warm when there is no roof?

  • @myrants5836
    @myrants5836 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    The lack of overhead protection is quite frightening!!

    • @mac2626
      @mac2626 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      You obviously don’t have a clue what you are on about.

    • @Jordon168
      @Jordon168 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      By the looks of things you ain’t got clue what you’re talking about. It’s not frightening at all. It's a versatile and agile vehicle primarily used for reconnaissance and fire support. The Jackal does provide protection for its crew, it's designed to be lightweight and highly maneuverable, which results in a lack of traditional head protection. The emphasis is on mobility and rapid response rather than heavy armor. The vehicle is equipped with other protective measures and can be modified based on operational requirements.

    • @regarded9702
      @regarded9702 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      ​@@Jordon168 unless it's more maneuverable than a drone it could really use something against them. It doesn't need to survive an atgm but if any random drone can kill everyone in it then it's practically worthless.

    • @Jordon168
      @Jordon168 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@regarded9702
      You can say the same thing about any other military vehicle, if the vehicle can’t out maneuver a drone then it’s completely worthless. The vehicle probably does not have the same level of armor as some other vehicles, but it offers features such as a V-shaped hull to deflect blasts and armored plating to protect against small arms fire and shrapnel. The open-topped design allows for better visibility and situational awareness, but it also means that additional caution and tactics are employed to mitigate risks. Military vehicles are part of a larger strategy and are used in combination with other assets to ensure the safety and effectiveness of operations.

    • @regarded9702
      @regarded9702 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Jordon168 no, a vehicle either has to be faster than a drone, able to shoot it down or only operate near friendly assets that can do so, or able to take a hit with minimal risk.
      Nobody expects their artillery to also shoot down drones, they just expect the artillery operate near friendly assets capable of doing so. That cannot be said of these vehicles, they will likely be operating on their own.

  • @alastairdrummond694
    @alastairdrummond694 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Absolute deathtrap.

  • @joh8379
    @joh8379 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Why would you service an open cabin fighting vehicle?

  • @a_bar8579
    @a_bar8579 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    ‏England must return to the leading industry that it was and is.

  • @biddyboy1570
    @biddyboy1570 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The Landrover morphed into something unexpected.

  • @patallen5095
    @patallen5095 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It looks like a rugged vehicle, but the sheer lack of crew enclosure, for protection from the sun and elements, as well as ballistic protection???????

  • @antikoerper256
    @antikoerper256 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Always had tremendous respect for the brits. There's a reason we're all speaking English now and its the current global language. Much love and respect form your humble NATO ally - Bulgaria!

    • @ivancho5854
      @ivancho5854 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      здравей България! 🇧🇬❤️🇬🇧

    • @Seven-Vials-W
      @Seven-Vials-W 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well you lot all did start off with Welsh until the Germans introduced you to the English tongue 😂

    • @uingaeoc3905
      @uingaeoc3905 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Seven-Vials-W Who was speaking Welsh - apart from the Welsh? The area of Angeln and Saxony were not Germany in the Fifth Century and English is no closer to German than Dutch is.

    • @nathan40307
      @nathan40307 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@uingaeoc3905we speak English because of America!

    • @uingaeoc3905
      @uingaeoc3905 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@nathan40307 Where is your 'we'? English was spoken across the globe before America became a World power, after WW2. The World's largest literature since Shakespeare's time is English long before any American literary tradition which did not occur until the first part of the 20th Century. English is the World's most spoken first and second language. English is the most spoken language in Europe even excluding the UK from the equation.

  • @BethanyRylands-o6n
    @BethanyRylands-o6n 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    1. Drones, these are side and below blast protective not above from the skies.
    2. Do we have to make these anymore top heavy?
    3. Do we even have the men to man these open coffins ?
    4. Take a look at Ukraine, if open top is not fast like a buggy? It's getting hit easily.

  • @teeanahera8949
    @teeanahera8949 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Improved cooling for the engine: rather than bring hot air in from outside we blow hot air out! 🙄 Obviously the laws of thermodynamics are unknown to the designers. Any air blown out will be replaced by air coming in from the outside WHICH IS HOT when they’re at low latitudes.

  • @AVOWIRENEWS
    @AVOWIRENEWS 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's truly exciting to hear about advancements in technology that focus on increased capabilities and, most importantly, on enhancing soldier protection. It's a significant step forward when technology is used to ensure the safety and efficiency of those who work in challenging environments. The commitment to safety and continuous improvement in such critical fields is absolutely commendable. It's always inspiring to see how innovative designs and technology can bring about such impactful changes. 🌟✨🛡

  • @gerhardtmuller7439
    @gerhardtmuller7439 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the 101 has risen like a phoenix.

  • @michaelmcginn7260
    @michaelmcginn7260 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    No drone protection.??

  • @MarkFarrington-hb2ne
    @MarkFarrington-hb2ne 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    A basketball hoop for grenades 🤔

  • @rionijam727
    @rionijam727 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Open top, what a death trap

  • @toml3285
    @toml3285 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ofcousrse it has increased the wheelbase the massive "improvement to beaching" brought in by jackel 11

  • @Runnifier
    @Runnifier 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Hell no to the open cockpit

  • @MichaelHassall-k8u
    @MichaelHassall-k8u 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    what no roof

    • @carwyngriffiths
      @carwyngriffiths 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s for increased situation awareness, it’s a light reconnaissance vehicle so it makes sense

  • @JasonDunn34
    @JasonDunn34 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Still doesn’t boast an improved roof!

  • @RihardsDel
    @RihardsDel 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Not a single word of FPV drone protection.
    They are still speaking about Afghanistan and improving based on that. The next war will be with a proxy of Russia, Iran or China. And the stuff they will have will eliminate that vehicle with one hit.
    Dreadful…..

    • @ptonpc
      @ptonpc 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Notice the mention of the ECW. That is common on British Army vehicles, it can be used to jam drones and remote controlled deivces.

  • @californiadreamin8423
    @californiadreamin8423 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What proportion of this vehicle are manufactured in the U.K. ?

  • @257squadron
    @257squadron 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is there any weather protection like a canvas roof? Has any other country bought these?

  • @EmRon1968
    @EmRon1968 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Send them to Ukraine and see how well they get on!

  • @jasonking6892
    @jasonking6892 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    10 Billion more for the Miltary 5 Billion more on pay and Recruiting
    60 Billion wasted on HS2👍🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

  • @nearestyoutube
    @nearestyoutube 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thumbnail looked like a Lego truck 😂

  • @narayankulkarni5378
    @narayankulkarni5378 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am very impressed this vehicle name is jackal

  • @archstanton6310
    @archstanton6310 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pathfinders will love it

  • @nathan40307
    @nathan40307 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is incredibly stupid! How does it provide "increased protection" when the soldiers are in an open air cab? Looks like it just sets them higher up to make better targets!

  • @teeanahera8949
    @teeanahera8949 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    “Improved stealth”, we painted in camo.

  • @UnderTheBanner
    @UnderTheBanner 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    One missed PK series solves the problem :D

  • @avrn1094
    @avrn1094 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    should get rid of the jackal period

  • @MrTheg2009
    @MrTheg2009 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I think i would rather walk.

  • @cristiandemirel1918
    @cristiandemirel1918 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's hard to survive those pesky drones in a 60 ton tank, and yet these idiots want you to go to war in a convertible.

  • @juan-pierreleroux8323
    @juan-pierreleroux8323 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "windscreen to keep the heat in" ***looks at open cab**...tell me the salesman has run out of benefits to pitch without telling me he has run about of benefits to pitch.
    Also if you are radiating heat outwards is that not worse for enemies to spot with thermals? It looks cool...i would want one for some overlanding, but this seems something more suited to keep Gen Z's soft hands warm in winter?

  • @Pete619
    @Pete619 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It’s a drone war, soldier protection zero more like😮

  • @CleanFinish2023
    @CleanFinish2023 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Those windscreens keep the heat in the cab…….really?

  • @MichaelK.-xl2qk
    @MichaelK.-xl2qk 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    He mentioned EM compatibility and lowered detection. Does this pertain to a hybrid electric option for maximum stealth, or to some sort of cable shielding?

    • @mac2626
      @mac2626 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Shut up Kelly.

    • @MichaelK.-xl2qk
      @MichaelK.-xl2qk 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mac2626 I know you just say that becuase you ❤

    • @ptonpc
      @ptonpc 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      EM compatibility so that equipment on board does not interfere with each other. Lowered detection, since targets have been tracked and destroyed because of the radio signals they give off. It will be cable shielding, earthing and shielding certain parts. The basic idea has been around since the 1930s (ish) to prevent the electrics of the vehicle affecting that radio. This will be improved techniques to get the EM stuff lower.
      ICE Jackals are surprisingly quiet already.

    • @MichaelK.-xl2qk
      @MichaelK.-xl2qk 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ptonpcThanks.

    • @ivancho5854
      @ivancho5854 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh please tell me it's not a HYBRID piece of over complex, unreliable, expensive garbage! 🤦

  • @stevenpremmel4116
    @stevenpremmel4116 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Don't fancy the gunner's chances much.

  • @tm5123
    @tm5123 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thought it was some odd new lego truck from the thumbnail 😆

  • @marksteven6116
    @marksteven6116 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Not been looking at Ukraine drones artillery only heavy armoured vehicles have any chance

  • @paulnewsome6289
    @paulnewsome6289 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cheeses Priced. Imagine being in one of those in a manpad/drone hit! NOOOO protection whatsoever.

  • @Pemmont107
    @Pemmont107 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Where's the roof?

    • @AtheistOrphan
      @AtheistOrphan 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It’s an optional extra.

    • @Pemmont107
      @Pemmont107 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AtheistOrphan Cool

    • @Jordon168
      @Jordon168 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Doesn’t need one

  • @pathfinder5651
    @pathfinder5651 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Fixing that is going to be a nightmare.

  • @edc1569
    @edc1569 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    So we've learnt nothing from Ukraine?

  • @ULHIS
    @ULHIS 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Looks like it's built from meccano.

  • @narayankulkarni5378
    @narayankulkarni5378 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sir how much pay load this truck can carry

  • @johnmelling1693
    @johnmelling1693 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not sure why people are moaning. I don't think the Ukrainians would be if they received them! As explained in the video it has its place in the future soldier structure 👍

  • @BritMemes
    @BritMemes 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This costs £2.5M 😂

  • @darrensmith6999
    @darrensmith6999 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Looks like one would be a sitting duck in one of these ?

    • @ptonpc
      @ptonpc 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Depends on what it is used for. It's not intended to go up against tanks etc. Older versions have been used very successfully.

    • @Dingdangdoo
      @Dingdangdoo 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ptonpc Tanks would be the least of it’s problems, this is designed for past conflicts and not future conflicts where the battlefield will be dominated by drones.

    • @carwyngriffiths
      @carwyngriffiths 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Dingdangdooand every vehicle can be destroyed by drone. So your point?
      It’s a light reconnaissance vehicle, its primary use is as such but it’s also used in a fire support role.

  • @HiHk-g9r
    @HiHk-g9r 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They had it before as well , which they used in Afghanistan , what happened to those armor's ....

  • @KommandantGSR
    @KommandantGSR 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have never heard a single person enjoy this vehicles design nor will i probably hear about it's differences
    though that Internal --> External cooling engine part is interesting

  • @BarrowZigger
    @BarrowZigger 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The comment about the windscreen keeping heat in was funny. At least Snatch landies had a roof. This thing wouldn't last 2 mins in Ukraine.

  • @garrybrough1881
    @garrybrough1881 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    whats the good of having this if we haven't got any troops to use it?

  • @martinanderson4721
    @martinanderson4721 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Any makrolon - we used in NI - slows down shrapnel etc.
    Gunner s high profile.

  • @colinmelling6369
    @colinmelling6369 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Big boys Meccao truck .

  • @spamuraigranatabru1149
    @spamuraigranatabru1149 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Will the Supacat Coyote also be getting this love?

  • @ralphkatsidis8338
    @ralphkatsidis8338 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Prone for ambush no protection for its side and front.

  • @wolfyys
    @wolfyys 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    As good as the Jackel is, I can't help but wonder if its a product of "fighting the last war".
    In the age of cheap FPV drones, it makes me wonder how survivable these open vehicles are.
    If one thing drones have proven, is that anyone can now be a target; atgm's due to their cost were almost always reserved for high value targets like MBT's and IFV..etc.
    Drones now allow even individual soldiers to be targeted at a fraction of the cost.

    • @ivancho5854
      @ivancho5854 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly. It's designed for a hot climate. Imagine driving this in a Finnish winter. 🤦

    • @garagenigel
      @garagenigel 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@ivancho5854they have been driving around Estonia for the last ten years! No problem at all!

  • @CastleHassall
    @CastleHassall 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i think the procurement people think guns are unessessary and might alarm people and be a health and safety risk so best not put any on the vehicles

  • @cdazz
    @cdazz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    No protection from improvised drones? 😮

  • @fuzielectron5172
    @fuzielectron5172 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Whether voluntary or a potential conscript in future, heres your wheels boys.

  • @colinobrien3806
    @colinobrien3806 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    open top with drones around? .....fireball and goodnight crew

  • @FishingSGsWild
    @FishingSGsWild 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    are those wheels made of solid rubber??

    • @ptonpc
      @ptonpc 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No.

  • @carsicktim3900
    @carsicktim3900 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There’s a lot of scepticism out there about the Jackal 3, however what I found most alarming was 1.52 into the video……..run for the hills guys! the medics on the GPMG!

  • @daniellee2343
    @daniellee2343 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where does the vehicle commander's GPMG go now?

  • @esm9154
    @esm9154 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not enough weather protection for the crew, no good for biting cold winds in winter in Estonia, or tropical storm deluges, even a light plastic tarp top would a huge improvement surely.

  • @graememckay9972
    @graememckay9972 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can someone fill in the gaps for me. I remember them saying poorly armoured snatch land rovers didn't provide enough troop protection from IED. Next thing I see is troops in various open top vehicles with half doors and rollcages. What happens in typical UK weather with constant wind and rain? Then boom, the powers that be sorted that with a windscreen. Did I miss something about invincible universal soldier terminator cyborgs driving these with less protection than a family saloon.

  • @SkywalkerExpress
    @SkywalkerExpress 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The vehicle is protected from mine-blast but the crew can easily injured by a kid with a sling shot

  • @savethebeesplantherbs8809
    @savethebeesplantherbs8809 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    will they carry dragon fire in future the army needs air defence

  • @camofrog44
    @camofrog44 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Operates better in heat? Comes in sand colour default? What year is this? Do the guys acquiring kit for the army think we're still fighting in the middle East only?

  • @ivancho5854
    @ivancho5854 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Australian Bushmaster and Canadian Senator are probably much better and battle tested in Ukraine. They're proven survivable. We should be preparing for a war in Europe, not Mali. How could this thing be used in a Finnish winter? It's designed to fight the last war - Afghanistan. Trust the MoD procurement office to be a decade out of step. And we need something affordable so that we can get more than a miserable 240! 🤦

    • @toekneekerching9543
      @toekneekerching9543 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      10 years out of step? more like 20, not surprising really when you consider this idiot seriously thinks a windshield will make a roofless cab warmer... Its unbelievable people like this can get to these positions of power.

  • @lukeweidemann9166
    @lukeweidemann9166 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why not just build/buy an enclosed vehicle? Why does the British Army always get second best? Who came up with this stupid idea?

  • @paulcoverdale8312
    @paulcoverdale8312 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Double glazing😂😂😂❤❤❤
    Is there goin to be a 8x8 mothership version?
    Luv these bits of kit.🙏🙏👍👍🇬🇧🇬🇧🥃🥃👊👊

  • @timwingham8952
    @timwingham8952 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Looks theatre specific to desert conflict. The lack of cover in European rain sleet snow and cold against a Russian adversary could seriously erode crew resilience. Rather them than me.

  • @hamishdavidson3368
    @hamishdavidson3368 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Whats the costing on these?

    • @ptonpc
      @ptonpc 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can look it up on the website.

    • @ivancho5854
      @ivancho5854 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Too much.

    • @BritMemes
      @BritMemes 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      £2.5M

    • @ivancho5854
      @ivancho5854 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@BritMemes Jesus wept.

    • @davidty2006
      @davidty2006 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Depends, used probably a few grand.
      Unused probably bit much.

  • @DBCOOPER982
    @DBCOOPER982 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sounds good for Eastern Europe

    • @Avro2
      @Avro2 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Maybe they should buy them

  • @zesda
    @zesda 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thumbnail suggested that Lego had released a new Technic set :(

  • @rafman016
    @rafman016 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’m dumber for having watched that 😒

  • @samburden1820
    @samburden1820 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If you give me a go I think I could break it and tell you what's wrong with it

  • @fuzielectron5172
    @fuzielectron5172 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why is ot that evertime I look at one of these I just think "what a piece of money making cr*p!"

  • @andyguyuk1
    @andyguyuk1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Somebody please explain why it's an open cab, how can you talk about protection when a kid could take you out with a stone,

  • @ivortoad
    @ivortoad 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's probably got self protection against it's own drone thwarting electronic defence

  • @andylees2940
    @andylees2940 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Lol a real British device built to a price… yea windscreen that’s extra, err no then, oh an armoured cab, that’s extra mate, oh err no then, 4 wheels, oh yea that’s included but it’s an air reinflation kit, spares are extra…etc etc

  • @thelazy0ne
    @thelazy0ne 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Rolling rivets 🤭