rare craftymasterman school project second channel upload WAHOOOO!!! if the video is dookie poopoo, well I made the entire thing start to finish in a day lol
If you want to get technical I'm pretty sure they used trademark law here instead of copyright. Trademark is them saying "hey I use this color to sell my goods and services, and if they aren't paying me for this service/goods, they're stealing." A better example to understand this type of case with color would be "My brand uses this very distinct color[scheme] to market our products. Anyone who sees this color will instantly recognize it and associate it with us. We need protection on this color[scheme] so people dont try to impersonate us." Think of Coca Cola with its iconic red and white. It's why you won't see other beverage companies use the exact same colors. To copyright something, it needs to be a piece of art with a very distinct "heart." There are also certain limitations on what can be protected by copyright. Facts and information are generally not protected. That's why journalists are all allowed to report on the same events.
IIRC it's not related to the literal colors at all, the names are what's being trademark claimed and they were stored with said names instead of raw color values. Pantone is still crappy, though. (Adobe is too lol)
@@drenz1523 Sorry, but I patented the number 1523 and require the removal of said number from your tag as soon as possible, as it violates the trademark agreement. Hmm... number copyright sounds possible these days
There's senses to pirate digital products and even physical ones, but colors?! What's next, oxygen piracy? **21XX visions of **_Fresh Air(TM)_** flashed** ... We're f ed, aren't we?
@@rusername fuck you mean snowflakes? It's not about anyone getting offended, just that this kind of language is not seen appriopriate by schools, since about forever
To clarify: they don’t own the colors. What they own is the color standard. Basically, they have taken the various color of inks, plastics, paints, etc, and found exact visual matches on all materials. If you’ve ever printed something, you know it looks way different on paper than your computer. Their system is designed to allow brands to get the EXACT same color on all products. There’s a ton of research that goes into it. But what was happening is that Photoshop let you use Pantone colors instead of the normal RGB system and so people designed with it instead of RGB, so once Pantone revoked the license, instead of converting the colors to the closest RGB formatted color, Adobe just made all the colors black, because they didn’t think it through
@@RowdyTheHitman Yeah. Pantone can't stop you from using certain colors. They can't even stop you from cataloging and keeping your own color library and color standards like they do. Lots of companies actually do have their color standards like PPG.
I experienced this same realization and anger when I was looking at specific flag designs that used Pantone colors and realized you have to pay to get a hex code APPROXIMATION, not even an exact answer.
There is no "exact answer" to match a Pantone colour using RGB - because RGB is not exact. Display the same RGB values on two different monitors - or the same CMYK on two different printers and you will get two different colours. The purpose of Pantone is to standardize colours so you know you are getting the same colour regardless of where you see it.
@@bunshine Pink ink is also not what pantone is used on usually. Edited. Autocorrect turned pink into print and I didn't notice it untill it was pointed out to me.
This was completely and utterly the fault of Adobe. There is ZERO reason that colors should not have been stored in their RGB flavors, and I suspect they still were. This is Adobe who chose to disable the colors. They could have just as easily had them continue to display but without any Pantone association.
You can still use RGB and also CMYK in Adobe software. It's just that many graphic designers thought they had to use the Pantone range to look professional. Most printers of books and paint manufacturers are perfectly comfortable using RGB and CMYK.
-...that's not how it works. "RGB" is not a standard.- (Apologies, I somehow missed the "flavors" part of "RGB") There are colour mappings like sRGB and Adobe RGB which are additive colour models, but Pantone is a subtractive colour model like the CMYK. Not only that, but Pantone uses 7 colors, CMYKOGV (cyan, magenta, yellow, key (black), orange, green, violet). It's not the fault of Adobe. What do they do, _not_ support a deeply ingrained industry standard?
@@NeatCrown Exactly, CMYK is good enough. BTW, Pantone is hardly a deeply ingrained industry standard. I know of printing shops that will give you a dirty look if you come with Pantone. The car manufacturing and garment industry also don't use it. Pantone sels its product as if it's some sort of holy grail. You're only a professional if you use their system. What they don't tell you is that color is highly subjective. All their nuanced colors don't mean a thing if everyone sees these differently.
@@NeatCrown There are open standards that support a full color space. There's absolutely no reason to save files in a format that only uses a legally protected system. The colors in the image have actual, real-world value equivalents that could be saved an infinite number of ways. Pick one. Or even create your own.
can we talk about how you can not only pirate color but also pirate DNA by growing your own plants at home from seeds that had their DNA copyrighted. If the DNA is copyrighted why are you selling it to me in the store. you may have unknowingly commited biopiracy by growing your apple seeds from the apple you bought at the store.
I (allegedly) knowingly commit bio-piracy every year. I (allegedly), grow the same strain of potatoes used by Lays chips in my garden. They (allegedly) fry and bake really nicely. Not that I would know of course. There are definitely none behind my house right now.
The FTC and regulatory agencies: _"Monopolies are bad!"_ Pantone: _We have several patents and trademarks with the US office. We have legal rights to own the entire standard._ The FTC and regulatory agencies: _Oh look at them. They are doing it all right!_
@@Amy-dq2lg Well there may be some benefits of that, its important to recognize that maintaining these standards is a legitimate service. RAL, another color standard which is owned by a German non profit org, still requires swatch books because these colors can't be interpreted digitally. RAL swatch books are also thousands of dollars because it is fundamentally expensive to produce and manage color accuracy. Even if all color standards were picked up by the ISO or another org, color accuracy would still be necessarily expensive.
@@MessiahOfRodentsWith an open standard, you now have companies that can compete to "implement" that standard, likely driving down prices and encouraging innovation. You also prevent documents from being destroyed by revoking a license.
@@MadocComadrin Real-world corollary: Blender 3D. Once it got more capable for modeling and rendering and more people started using it the retail price for Autodesk Maya and 3D Studio and other 3d software dropped like a rock. Maya Unlimited used to be over $7000. Today the cost for Maya 2025 is less than that for a three year license. A single-year seat costs $1875. Blender is still free, though.
I am so very glad I have an offline installer for Photoshop 2021. That's something you get never told, that with subsciption services, you always have the latest version and features - but which can also mean, features taken away. And honestly, as dedicated hobbyist, there is no point in always having the newest modifications to the code. In fact, I find it counterproductive. When I am used to a program, I would like to keep using it exactly this way. Knowing, that they won't throw around functionality, shortcuts and other details. Hell, I would still work with my Adobe Photoshop Elements 2.0 from 2002, that came as a full version on disk with my computer back then - if it wouldn't be buggy as all hell on newer operating systems.......
I used to be chasing those new shiny features, until it stopped looking shiny when I realized it's a fomo. familiar and stable things are better in the end.
Forced bleeding edge. I always always try to remain at least a few updates behind the curve if just to let them work out the bugs from the next release. The problem is there are no options to update to anything but the most current version and there is no guarantee that the bugs aren’t just hiding waiting for me anyway no matter what version I’m on.
@@daisiedragon He don't undersand what are purpose of pantone and who are intendet users. It is mostly for companies (big companies), it isn't copywright on colors, wavelength or anything like this. It is also not replaceabke by RGB
GIMP doesn't offer Pantone... The problem only happened in Photoshop if the colour in the document was a Pantone colour. It didn't turn every image black - only those using Pantone.
It's not a number corresponding to RGB. It's a color system that corresponds to base color mixtures, their ratio and so on. It's basically a recipe for that specific color intended for print.
@@SigmaMan1448 the designers using the pantone color system aren't using it for digital colors tho. that would be silly lol. they're usually using it for print, but also textile, matte, etc. rgb/cmyk are color mixing models, but cannot provide standardized color recipes. as stated in the video, different printers with different ink give different colors the pantone stuff in adobe software existed to give designers an easier ability to communicate what pantone colors are in a design. i think i may be misremembering, but i think adobe & pantone basically agreed that adobe would have a monopoly when it comes to Official (tm) pantone representation in software. but then pantone threw a fit and decided that you have to pay now (which was previously free in adobe products)
@@furTronNon-profit would be communism in the eyes of a real American. Like the European health care systems. And with RAL, we don‘t have such a nice thing like the „Pantone Color of the year“
I'm disapointed the video didn't cover that Pantone colours included in Adobe products were outdated and sat in a specific panel for Pantone. Anyone who worked with Pantone with the intention to produce an actual product couldn't practically use them as the older versions were both inaccurate and in many cases, not legal to produce due to new environmental laws (relating to chemicals) which lead to changes to the swatches (hence requiring a new version). So in many instances, you couldn't use it for its actual purpose and in other instances, it lead to confusion. Adobe didn't update the swatches for decades.
well the video concludes with "go pirate stuff" as if this kind of product targets individuals rather than businesses lmao and people larp it up as the correct move.
@@shellshockedgerman3947 yes, pretty on point. promoting obsolete software and people arguing about replacing Pantone with whatever color space not going to happen.
imagine paying for the monthly subscription for photoshop and they decide to screw you over anyway because a momentary increase in profit is somehow better than your customers not hating every fiber of your being
Ok, but like, pantone doesn't own any color, pantone makes ink, they own the ink they make, which is conceptually irreplicable, that is what they own. And they are very well documented, so they make designer lives quite a bit easier actually
Isn't it though? They could have easily transferred the pantone colors into their equivalent RGB variant or something instead of disabling them and none would be wiser. Or add an additional warning that they tried their best to convert the colors but they might not be accurate enough. At least that would be better than what they actually did.
@@sharif47 It is impossible to "easily transferred the pantone colors into their equivalent RGB variant". But this comments are clear example that most people here don't understand what they are talking about. Probably as many of "graphic designers" who were using pantone in PS
@@sychuan3729 could you explain why it's impossible instead of simply claiming and calling it a day? Maybe it wouldn't be a 1:1 representation. But it would still be better than pure black and white as long as the changes are communicated properly (maybe through a pop-up).
There was a "Chocolate War". Cadbury accused another brand of using "their" colour packaging (a royal blue). The respondents wheeled in a trolley with 20 other companies chocolates who used the same colour. As far as buying a colour reference chart that fades, everyone in the Cinema Industry uses a Reference Chart that has rigor.
The joke is, this price is partially justified. Not to the 9000$ mark, but they literally mass produce color standards annually and they must be precise.
9K is the cost of the plastic chips library. It exists so you can coordinate plastic colors with factories. If you are in the process of ordering plastic goods from factories and color accuracy matters, you will save so much time and money the 9000 truly does not matter. The complete color library that you would need if you were doing prints is only 2k and has basically the same considerations. These aren't consumer products
@@LinkRammer Yes, but being able to accurately represent those values in real life print or paint or other pigmentation is what the color libraries are for. If you don't care that your colors might be slightly off then you needn't bother with Pantone's color reference library.
Seeing the LTT orange bit really hit me. Something I realized a while back is that I literally am a walking advertisement for them. I am not exaggerating, the only clothing I have that isn't theirs are the pants, and the socks - because they don't make jeans nor socks. I am currently wearing the short circuit hoodie, the RGBroken T-shirt, their underwear, a pair of random jeans, and Darn Tough socks - which has the Linus brand of approval, and I can confirm, they good. And that's without counting the screwdriver, backpack, tech sac, and also the JerryRigEverything knife I got from their store. I even have all three size of their water bottles because honestly they're all handy. So, all of this to say : I feel called out.
1. I expected Pantone to be FAR older than just from the 1950s, I always assumed they were descended from some dye conpany from the Victorian Era. 2. The use of Bloons Tower Defence 5 music is appreciated!
Pantone was created as a vertical integration of the founders advertising business. It's the drive for consistency of branding that made the market. Before them you would specify the pigment types to be used and their proportion. It increased the stocks of pigments to keep on hand.
Guys I don't think most of yall realise that a lot of the fault is with photoshop. They could have easily matched the color to the relative hex value instead of turning everything black when Pantone support was removed
Yeah I don't understand this: I never worked with the Pantone "swatches" but weren't they just CMYK/RGB/Hex colour values, but with a Pantone "label" on them for easy look up & comparison to your physical swatches? Did Adobe turn it black as some sort of political statement against Pantone? It seems like it was more effort than just removing the names/labelling in the code?
Despite the number of pantone colors I use in my illustrator projects - this never actually happened to me. I can still see old files which used pantone colors and they're all still there.
I am pretty sure Pantone did not revoke the license. There are still basic colors of Pantone in Adobe Products, but Adobe didn‘t want to renew the license or pay more money or whatever so ADOBE decided to remove it. Also what is misleading to a lot of people, it is not like all logos just turned black! Only when the before included Pantone colors were used directly by choosing e.g. „pantone red“ in Photoshop, did they actually get black after this change. You can still use the exact same color, but it is not called „pantone red“ now. Pantone is only naming colors, it does not own them. Nonetheless, pantones pricing seems a bit ridiculous. In the end, a lot of people don‘t buy the 9000$ book or similar, they just use the „digital colors“ as they send it off to print etc. So there is a reasoning behind making people pay for that as well.
Pantone and Adobe are two companies that have a monopoly and charge what they think they can get away with. It started when Adobe decided to go down the subscription model route with no physical copies available.
As a graphic designer I'm 100% sure you don't even need pantone in your work. It looks like most people here you even don't understand what pantone is about
There's nothing stopping you creating a spot colour in your document and naming it the same way Pantone does. Then just find a website that lets you look up the Lab values for that colour.
@@CraftysBunker “Pro colour yapper” is a peak analysis of Pantone, you do not realize your own genius/Half joking /It was still super entertaining to watch!
God the AGONY of being a graphic designer for the first time at a print shop and slowly learning about why pantone is garbage!!!! I had to spend so much time making an account, but then it dropped the paywall on me only after showing the color library right in front of my face. I was thinking, "no way i have to PAY for colors, and add the fee to my client's bill because of a fucking COLOR." But no, i do in fact have to pay for a color. The frick? Is this a joke? I just want the color blue!! Is that too much to ask? But noooooo they own allll the fucking colors now. Colors? Capitolism. I wish i could pirate them, but that would be bad for the print shop lmaooooo
@@TheOddHawk You know nothing is stopping you from marking a color as a spot color and naming it any pantone color? The print shop will know which color to use. The issue is, without a color reference fan, you don't know how that color will look anyway. So yes, you can "pirate" them. Whatever that means. It's not bad for anyone. So no, they don't own any colors. They own the formulas for accurate color reproduction in print. You should also make clear to the client that using Pantone will be more expensive. From creating the materials to them printing it. If your client isn't willing to do this, it makes no sense to offer it to them in the first place. You're way exaggerating everything here.
@TunaIRL yeah, but heres the thing. I don't get a choice in these situations. I had to buy a subscription and use a specific Pantene color because I was told to do so. One of my orders was to fix a stupid pocket folder so that it could be outsourced and they kept giving us all these instructions so that it was taking forever to get it made and we were on a deadline. They gave us specific Pantene names that they wanted us to use for the reds and blues. Adobe doesn't just let you color pick that crap. It converts to cmyk or rgb if you do. So no, I can't.
@@TheOddHawk You do not need to buy anything to do that. What you do is mark the color as a spot color and simply name it the pantone color you want it to be. The app is simply a luxury that makes finding stuff and creating swatches easier. The color could be CMYK 100/0/0/0 in the file, with the name PMS RED 032 C and as a spot color, the print shop will know to use that specific pantone red in production. This mostly seems like an issue with a lack of experience or knowledge in industry.
Nah, this is crazy. I thought you could only *trademark* corpo colors in specific instances, not flat out remove colors for being the same flavor as someone's book.
That's not what it is. They only own the match between a name/identifier and how the color actually looks in real life. So for example "Pantone 13-1024" which is some Peach like color. They don't own that color, just the combination of the name and that color as a pair.
wow, a company being greedy making things worse for people??? that's crazy, kinda reminds me of the billion other times it happened. maybe there's some sort of structural issue, could even be the whole concept of more money equaling better... nah that can't be it
"All their logos turned a solid black" They did? Let me check my decade old pirated PS that works perfectly fine and never updates: Nope, colors are still here. I can't imagine why any professional would use a subscription-based program, unless they're made to do so by their boss (in my experience no one cares what you use though). It's like having your organized desk, then every couple years the desk gets automatically re-arranged and two of your pen cups are gone, also there's a new measuring tape on the table you didn't ask for. Seems very counter-productive.
to quote zack freedman, "these corrupted pseudo-human reptiles and their so-called intellectual property lawyers believe they can extract rent from anyone who uses the color 0x008E9A." it's honestly on the same level as trying to copyright musical phrases or melodies, and i hope someone does something similar in response and generates all 16,777,216 possible RGB colors and puts it under creative commons.
not to yap but pantone isn't pretending to "own" colors or making you pay to use a hex code or whatever (and it pisses me off whenever i see someone say that omg comment section aaa). pantone owns, operates, and sells access to an infrastructure that ensures color fidelity across literally everywhere it's used, whether that is print, textiles, matte, etc., known as a color system. to put it simply, they own the recipes to color. you CANNOT just go, hey, i want a shirt in color #ffff00. RGB, CMYK, etc. are color mixing models, which are NOT the same thing as a color system: they merely *represent/model* color, they aren't the actual pigments or lights that make color themselves. in RGB, #ffff00 is 100% red and 100% green: this does not represent a solid, concrete pigment though: computer screens (which RGB is made for, since that's how pixels work yada yada ya) will display #ffff00 in wildly different ways. to tie this back to the shirt example, the producers of the yellow die in the shirt are working with physical pigments and the RGB model, used for screens, is not relevant at all. if i am a yellow shirt producer, i can use sooo many different ways to produce yellow, but i'd need a color system to ensure i am always producing a consistent color. the actual physical pigments will be much more complex than say, RGB. maybe i could used a synthetic dye? natural dyes like saffron? as for printing, CMYK also has this problem. CMYK printers print tiny dots (cyan, magenta, yellow, black) to produce an illusion of the entire color spectrum (in the same way pixels do). as stated in this video, two printers with different inks may produce different colors. pantone also does spot inks, which instead of doing the tiny dot thing are actually the color themselves (printed money never uses CMYK printing) pantone owns a monopoly on color systems. it has little to no real impact on people who are designers, but virtually EVERY designer uses them. that's why pantone fuckery is just that huge. unfortunately there aren't that many other non-commercial color systems out there and cynically, it's unlikely the US government is going to step in and regulate a really esoteric industry since monopoly-busting is rare nowadays so a summary: 1) RGB, CMYK, etc. are NOT substitutes for a color system 2) a color system is used to ensure color fidelty. they provide the recipes for color 3) RGB, CMYK, etc. are *color mixing models*. they *represent* colors, but they are not the actual physical pigments or lights themselves. they are used in specific scenarios: rgb for screens and CMYK for printing. screens that use RGB and printers that use CMYK can field different color results even if they use the "same" color
this is too long lmao i could have made this a much smaller explanation. tl;dr -- pantone is in the business of color recipes across a huge gamut of shit (print, matte, textiles) and deals with physical colors. there's nothing a hex code can do in lieu of physical design stuff
@@sweetypuss Explaining to the people who have never dabbled in printing or design and just blindly hate because someone told them to == shilling for pantone
ChatGPT Tidak, saya tidak setuju. Hak cipta memiliki peran penting dalam melindungi karya intelektual dan memberikan insentif bagi pencipta untuk terus berkarya. Tanpa hak cipta, banyak orang mungkin enggan untuk menghasilkan karya-karya kreatif karena takut karya mereka akan disalahgunakan atau dicuri tanpa izin. Hak cipta memberikan pemilik karya hak eksklusif untuk mengontrol penggunaan, reproduksi, dan distribusi karya mereka, sehingga memungkinkan mereka untuk memperoleh penghasilan dari karya mereka dan mendorong inovasi. Namun, saya juga menyadari bahwa sistem hak cipta dapat memiliki kelemahan atau disalahgunakan dalam beberapa kasus. Misalnya, dalam beberapa situasi, hak cipta dapat digunakan untuk membatasi akses terhadap informasi yang penting atau karya-karya yang memiliki nilai sosial atau edukatif. Oleh karena itu, perlu ada keseimbangan antara perlindungan hak cipta dan kepentingan masyarakat umum dalam mengakses informasi dan budaya. Jadi, sementara hak cipta tidak sempurna dan mungkin memerlukan reformasi, saya tidak setuju bahwa itu adalah salah satu dari tiga ide terburuk yang pernah dimiliki manusia.
Holy crap. I used to work in commercial print, where everything was based on Pantone spot colours in your files. I can’t imagine how much mess this caused.
![[ไฮไลต์] ฟุตบอลชาย อุซเบกิสถาน vs สเปน รอบแบ่งกลุ่ม | โอลิมปิก 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/2ps5WKV1Mq0/mqdefault.jpg)
woh school project video! (yes im aware that the video is kinda mid xd)
did you get an a?
LETS GO THE BALLOONS MUSIC
Cool video! What school do you do?
how did you do?
@@boas_ bro is trying to dox him 💀
Imagine copyrighting a wavelength of light
If you want to get technical I'm pretty sure they used trademark law here instead of copyright. Trademark is them saying "hey I use this color to sell my goods and services, and if they aren't paying me for this service/goods, they're stealing."
A better example to understand this type of case with color would be "My brand uses this very distinct color[scheme] to market our products. Anyone who sees this color will instantly recognize it and associate it with us. We need protection on this color[scheme] so people dont try to impersonate us." Think of Coca Cola with its iconic red and white. It's why you won't see other beverage companies use the exact same colors.
To copyright something, it needs to be a piece of art with a very distinct "heart." There are also certain limitations on what can be protected by copyright. Facts and information are generally not protected. That's why journalists are all allowed to report on the same events.
@@AaelmfaoBDplays46 seconds ago
IIRC it's not related to the literal colors at all, the names are what's being trademark claimed and they were stored with said names instead of raw color values. Pantone is still crappy, though. (Adobe is too lol)
What next, copyrighting numbers?!
@@drenz1523 Sorry, but I patented the number 1523 and require the removal of said number from your tag as soon as possible, as it violates the trademark agreement.
Hmm... number copyright sounds possible these days
remember: it's always morally correct to pirate adobe products
also ironic how pirate versions did not lost colors
this just proves and strengthens the reasons why pirating exists.
long live piracy LMAO
piracy is like boycotting, but better :)
@@thenuggywuggy8389nah, more like stealing from the fat and rich
But Adobe isnt the culprit here, pantone is
@@merbuddAdobe has done their fair bit of bad shit too
You wouldn't download a COLOR
nft mfs when i ss they're dumb monkeys:
I could download a car tho
Man this new Breaking Bad spinoff hits different... 😅
This is such an underrated comment 😂
I'm dead 😭
If buying isn't owning, piracy isn't stealing.
This catchphrase is objectively wrong and does not show benefits of the piracy for a global community. Please, stop discrediting piracy.
@@Romashka_Sovbro went twitter mode over a joke 💀
@@Fwenec because this joke does not make sense. I know you can do better
@@Romashka_Sov is correcting jokes a valuable form of your time?
@@Fwenec maybe, maybe not. I can definitely tell this only once my time is over
Pirating Colors.
WHY THE F*** IS THIS EVEN A THING IT SHOULDN'T EVEN BE NECESSARY IN THE FIRST PLACE
The world is a sad place
Can't even have Color for Free
rent-seeking behavior by capitalist entities. there's your answer.
There's senses to pirate digital products and even physical ones, but colors?! What's next, oxygen piracy? **21XX visions of **_Fresh Air(TM)_** flashed** ... We're f ed, aren't we?
@@ultimaxkom8728 wait until you learn about oxygen bars lmao
@@AaelmfaoBDplays :(
putting “pro color yapper” in a school project is wildd
i think "start pirating things" is even more wild
0:49
snowflakes
@@rusernamewot
@@rusername fuck you mean snowflakes?
It's not about anyone getting offended, just that this kind of language is not seen appriopriate by schools, since about forever
YOU WOULDNT DOWNLOAD A LIGHT WAVELENGTH
I would. Billions of combinations of millions of them. It’s called an app.
@@MatthewConnellan-xc3oji forgot to think about that
To clarify: they don’t own the colors. What they own is the color standard. Basically, they have taken the various color of inks, plastics, paints, etc, and found exact visual matches on all materials. If you’ve ever printed something, you know it looks way different on paper than your computer.
Their system is designed to allow brands to get the EXACT same color on all products. There’s a ton of research that goes into it. But what was happening is that Photoshop let you use Pantone colors instead of the normal RGB system and so people designed with it instead of RGB, so once Pantone revoked the license, instead of converting the colors to the closest RGB formatted color, Adobe just made all the colors black, because they didn’t think it through
The amount of people that don't understand this is infuriating
@@RowdyTheHitman Yeah. Pantone can't stop you from using certain colors. They can't even stop you from cataloging and keeping your own color library and color standards like they do. Lots of companies actually do have their color standards like PPG.
@@Strideo1 Precisely!
Yes sure. Doesn't still mean that are greedy and not helping any1 with their ridiculous pricing.
@@8lec_Rno one is making you buy their thing......
I experienced this same realization and anger when I was looking at specific flag designs that used Pantone colors and realized you have to pay to get a hex code APPROXIMATION, not even an exact answer.
There is no "exact answer" to match a Pantone colour using RGB - because RGB is not exact.
Display the same RGB values on two different monitors - or the same CMYK on two different printers and you will get two different colours.
The purpose of Pantone is to standardize colours so you know you are getting the same colour regardless of where you see it.
@@G5rry interesting, thanks. Likely more of an issue with displays, hex, and RGB then
@@G5rry printing ink isnt exact either :P and it fades over time. hex codes are standardized
@@bunshine Pink ink is also not what pantone is used on usually.
Edited. Autocorrect turned pink into print and I didn't notice it untill it was pointed out to me.
@@bunshine Also, do you own a calibrated $10 000 monitor? because if you don't I have bad news about your standardized hex codes.
instructions unclear, started plundering barrels of oil from nearby oil rigs.
Are they land based or offshore?
What sort of oil we talking?
@@dumaass olive probably
@@xylophone_888 might be.
@@dumaassextra virgin
This was completely and utterly the fault of Adobe. There is ZERO reason that colors should not have been stored in their RGB flavors, and I suspect they still were. This is Adobe who chose to disable the colors. They could have just as easily had them continue to display but without any Pantone association.
You can still use RGB and also CMYK in Adobe software. It's just that many graphic designers thought they had to use the Pantone range to look professional. Most printers of books and paint manufacturers are perfectly comfortable using RGB and CMYK.
-...that's not how it works. "RGB" is not a standard.- (Apologies, I somehow missed the "flavors" part of "RGB") There are colour mappings like sRGB and Adobe RGB which are additive colour models, but Pantone is a subtractive colour model like the CMYK. Not only that, but Pantone uses 7 colors, CMYKOGV (cyan, magenta, yellow, key (black), orange, green, violet). It's not the fault of Adobe. What do they do, _not_ support a deeply ingrained industry standard?
@@NeatCrownthey don’t anymore 🤷🤷
@@NeatCrown Exactly, CMYK is good enough.
BTW, Pantone is hardly a deeply ingrained industry standard. I know of printing shops that will give you a dirty look if you come with Pantone. The car manufacturing and garment industry also don't use it.
Pantone sels its product as if it's some sort of holy grail. You're only a professional if you use their system. What they don't tell you is that color is highly subjective. All their nuanced colors don't mean a thing if everyone sees these differently.
@@NeatCrown There are open standards that support a full color space. There's absolutely no reason to save files in a format that only uses a legally protected system. The colors in the image have actual, real-world value equivalents that could be saved an infinite number of ways. Pick one. Or even create your own.
this was literally a powerpuff girls villain power i'm pretty sure
like there was a whole episode about a clown stealing color from the world
Now we just need a great song to bring all the colors back ✨
LPT: Don't use live service software for anything important; if you don't own it, then someone else does.
can we talk about how you can not only pirate color but also pirate DNA by growing your own plants at home from seeds that had their DNA copyrighted. If the DNA is copyrighted why are you selling it to me in the store. you may have unknowingly commited biopiracy by growing your apple seeds from the apple you bought at the store.
I (allegedly) knowingly commit bio-piracy every year. I (allegedly), grow the same strain of potatoes used by Lays chips in my garden. They (allegedly) fry and bake really nicely. Not that I would know of course. There are definitely none behind my house right now.
@@DigitalJedi danm bro i didn't know you were such a biopirate thats crazy.
@@DigitalJedi How'd you manage that? Genuine question because I was thinking I wanted to start growing my own potatoes
biopiracy is such a word
@@daftish_birdman(allegedly)
The FTC and regulatory agencies: _"Monopolies are bad!"_
Pantone: _We have several patents and trademarks with the US office. We have legal rights to own the entire standard._
The FTC and regulatory agencies: _Oh look at them. They are doing it all right!_
we need to nationalize pantone
@@formerlycringe internationalise, make it a U.N. thing
@@Amy-dq2lg Well there may be some benefits of that, its important to recognize that maintaining these standards is a legitimate service. RAL, another color standard which is owned by a German non profit org, still requires swatch books because these colors can't be interpreted digitally. RAL swatch books are also thousands of dollars because it is fundamentally expensive to produce and manage color accuracy. Even if all color standards were picked up by the ISO or another org, color accuracy would still be necessarily expensive.
@@MessiahOfRodentsWith an open standard, you now have companies that can compete to "implement" that standard, likely driving down prices and encouraging innovation. You also prevent documents from being destroyed by revoking a license.
@@MadocComadrin Real-world corollary: Blender 3D. Once it got more capable for modeling and rendering and more people started using it the retail price for Autodesk Maya and 3D Studio and other 3d software dropped like a rock.
Maya Unlimited used to be over $7000. Today the cost for Maya 2025 is less than that for a three year license. A single-year seat costs $1875.
Blender is still free, though.
The solution for Minecrafters is:
Ignore the real life, rgb is all we need
Well, yes, but which one? sRGB, Adobe RGB, ProPhoto, Display P3, ...?
/j
@@NovacrabsRGB. Just sRGB. It's an IEC standard and would look good on all screens.
@@user-wc2gl4xt3f Good-ish, anyway. As long as you don't care for HDR or wide-gamut or stuff like that.
@@user-wc2gl4xt3f That's great, how do you want to print in additive color space ?
jokes on you crafty I never stopped pirating
Same
*joke's ; *, crafty,
this isn't minecraft!!!
oh
i mean adobe made minecraft that has to count for something
This, is Minceraft
nobody cares
@JackSalzmanermm actually, my dad is photoshop and he made roblox, and his friend is minecraft. also my dad could beat your dad in a fight!!!
_This video contains content by _*_PANTONE_*_ who has since removed it on copyright grounds._
gotta start releasing black and white youtube videos now
@@mildlyconcerning they 30s PANTONE called, they want to copyright strike it lol
I am so very glad I have an offline installer for Photoshop 2021. That's something you get never told, that with subsciption services, you always have the latest version and features - but which can also mean, features taken away. And honestly, as dedicated hobbyist, there is no point in always having the newest modifications to the code. In fact, I find it counterproductive. When I am used to a program, I would like to keep using it exactly this way. Knowing, that they won't throw around functionality, shortcuts and other details.
Hell, I would still work with my Adobe Photoshop Elements 2.0 from 2002, that came as a full version on disk with my computer back then - if it wouldn't be buggy as all hell on newer operating systems.......
I used to be chasing those new shiny features, until it stopped looking shiny when I realized it's a fomo. familiar and stable things are better in the end.
Forced bleeding edge. I always always try to remain at least a few updates behind the curve if just to let them work out the bugs from the next release. The problem is there are no options to update to anything but the most current version and there is no guarantee that the bugs aren’t just hiding waiting for me anyway no matter what version I’m on.
Uh,, AI is changing the landscape forever. And the way Adobe is implementing it into a workflow it is incredible. Trust me, you need it.
Bro really made colour a monthly subscription
It's the same with land value tax and paying for water. But no one complains.
as a person with a pirated Photoshop I see this as an absolute win
This sounds like a cartoon villain
why we stick to open source tools and standards like krita instead of giving these companies more $$$
*open-source tools (hyphen required)
That was fantastic, I can't believe it's just a school project. I would totally watch more of these.
Dragon
@@bluepterosaur yes, that's me
I mean, it’s pretty uninformed
@@WiggyWamWam What did they get wrong?
@@daisiedragon He don't undersand what are purpose of pantone and who are intendet users. It is mostly for companies (big companies), it isn't copywright on colors, wavelength or anything like this. It is also not replaceabke by RGB
This is why we use GIMP
GIMP doesn't offer Pantone... The problem only happened in Photoshop if the colour in the document was a Pantone colour. It didn't turn every image black - only those using Pantone.
@@G5rrySo why would they black out everything instead of just changing the Pantone colors to an RGB approximation?
@@mgord9518 they ask you to pay money for that lolz long live piracy
gimp sux use krita
GIMP isn't even capable of CMYK, can't imagine Pantone
It is literally a number corresponding to red green and blue. Pure insanity, just remember that free software/libreware would not do this to you
Typical win for classic RGB
It's not a number corresponding to RGB. It's a color system that corresponds to base color mixtures, their ratio and so on. It's basically a recipe for that specific color intended for print.
@@randoguy7488so, rgb with extra steps that they can somehow use to justify "owning" colors. Same thing.
@@randoguy7488 I meant the digital colors. Not the physical pantone colors
@@SigmaMan1448 the designers using the pantone color system aren't using it for digital colors tho. that would be silly lol. they're usually using it for print, but also textile, matte, etc. rgb/cmyk are color mixing models, but cannot provide standardized color recipes. as stated in the video, different printers with different ink give different colors
the pantone stuff in adobe software existed to give designers an easier ability to communicate what pantone colors are in a design. i think i may be misremembering, but i think adobe & pantone basically agreed that adobe would have a monopoly when it comes to Official (tm) pantone representation in software. but then pantone threw a fit and decided that you have to pay now (which was previously free in adobe products)
a classic case of "pirating makes the product better"
The engineering community that uses the German RAL color system in painting specifications looks the case bit puzzled..
It is worth to mention, that RAL is a non-profit organization.
@@furTronNon-profit would be communism in the eyes of a real American. Like the European health care systems.
And with RAL, we don‘t have such a nice thing like the „Pantone Color of the year“
ITS COLOR!!! ITS NATURE!!! WHY ARE THEY PRIVITIZING NATURE!!!
Wait until you hear about water bottles lmao
Wait until you hear about the crop seed industry
They're privatizing the system and the recipe to get to that specific color with pigments
land.
Wait till you hear about fresh air
This is still insane if only made in a day. It’d take me weeks to make a 3 minute long video this well edited. Teach me your secrets,
running a minecraft channel for 6 years
@@CraftysBunker Fair
I'm disapointed the video didn't cover that Pantone colours included in Adobe products were outdated and sat in a specific panel for Pantone. Anyone who worked with Pantone with the intention to produce an actual product couldn't practically use them as the older versions were both inaccurate and in many cases, not legal to produce due to new environmental laws (relating to chemicals) which lead to changes to the swatches (hence requiring a new version). So in many instances, you couldn't use it for its actual purpose and in other instances, it lead to confusion. Adobe didn't update the swatches for decades.
well the video concludes with "go pirate stuff" as if this kind of product targets individuals rather than businesses lmao and people larp it up as the correct move.
@@shellshockedgerman3947 Yes I have no idea why this video was made. It looks incredibly uneducated
@@shellshockedgerman3947 yes, pretty on point. promoting obsolete software and people arguing about replacing Pantone with whatever color space not going to happen.
why the hell did adobe rely on a proprietary color system that u need a license for, without storing the colors in another format as backup?
they're adobe
because that's the only professional color system in the manufacturing industry
just imagine if they made music softwares they might even copyright certain frequencies
imagine paying for the monthly subscription for photoshop and they decide to screw you over anyway because a momentary increase in profit is somehow better than your customers not hating every fiber of your being
I love how just a few years ago it was "I don't recommend pirating, you know, but the option is there" to "LOL, go for it, they deserve to be robbed".
loving the bloons music in the background :)
I consider them a color cataloging company
Pretty much.
Ok, but like, pantone doesn't own any color, pantone makes ink, they own the ink they make, which is conceptually irreplicable, that is what they own. And they are very well documented, so they make designer lives quite a bit easier actually
Honestly surprised it wasn't Adobe's fault this time
Isn't it though? They could have easily transferred the pantone colors into their equivalent RGB variant or something instead of disabling them and none would be wiser.
Or add an additional warning that they tried their best to convert the colors but they might not be accurate enough.
At least that would be better than what they actually did.
@@sharif47 Wouldn't be surprised if Adobe got sued by Pantone for 'lost revenue' if they did that.
@@randoguy7488 as if Adobe doesn't have enough lawyer to counter them...
Then again, they're probably reserved for fking customers, not their rivals.
@@sharif47 It is impossible to "easily transferred the pantone colors into their equivalent RGB variant". But this comments are clear example that most people here don't understand what they are talking about. Probably as many of "graphic designers" who were using pantone in PS
@@sychuan3729 could you explain why it's impossible instead of simply claiming and calling it a day?
Maybe it wouldn't be a 1:1 representation. But it would still be better than pure black and white as long as the changes are communicated properly (maybe through a pop-up).
The colors of their logo are the GameCube controller
There was a "Chocolate War". Cadbury accused another brand of using "their" colour packaging (a royal blue). The respondents wheeled in a trolley with 20 other companies chocolates who used the same colour. As far as buying a colour reference chart that fades, everyone in the Cinema Industry uses a Reference Chart that has rigor.
Imagine paying $9000 for a book with random colors in it
The joke is, this price is partially justified. Not to the 9000$ mark, but they literally mass produce color standards annually and they must be precise.
9K is the cost of the plastic chips library. It exists so you can coordinate plastic colors with factories. If you are in the process of ordering plastic goods from factories and color accuracy matters, you will save so much time and money the 9000 truly does not matter. The complete color library that you would need if you were doing prints is only 2k and has basically the same considerations. These aren't consumer products
Companies pay it because they aren't random. They're very specific colors.
@@Strideo1 they're still just specific RGB values
@@LinkRammer Yes, but being able to accurately represent those values in real life print or paint or other pigmentation is what the color libraries are for. If you don't care that your colors might be slightly off then you needn't bother with Pantone's color reference library.
The Simple answer: Use Affinity
They didn't steal your damn colors.
This is a really good video pal, gives you all the information in less than 5 minutes
CraftyMasterMan video essays are something I didn't know I needed
Honestly, Pantone should go bankrupt. I feel like they could sue me at any moment for using color in my graphic design.
Seeing the LTT orange bit really hit me.
Something I realized a while back is that I literally am a walking advertisement for them.
I am not exaggerating, the only clothing I have that isn't theirs are the pants, and the socks - because they don't make jeans nor socks.
I am currently wearing the short circuit hoodie, the RGBroken T-shirt, their underwear, a pair of random jeans, and Darn Tough socks - which has the Linus brand of approval, and I can confirm, they good.
And that's without counting the screwdriver, backpack, tech sac, and also the JerryRigEverything knife I got from their store.
I even have all three size of their water bottles because honestly they're all handy.
So, all of this to say :
I feel called out.
99.9% of your target market won't know or care if your colors are perfect PMS matches.
I'm so glad this wasn't a 20 second short or a 40 minute video essay
we want more crafty mastertasium videos! ❤
Honestly a good school project video lol
Genuinely interested, could've been an actual video lmao
1. I expected Pantone to be FAR older than just from the 1950s, I always assumed they were descended from some dye conpany from the Victorian Era.
2. The use of Bloons Tower Defence 5 music is appreciated!
Pantone was created as a vertical integration of the founders advertising business. It's the drive for consistency of branding that made the market. Before them you would specify the pigment types to be used and their proportion. It increased the stocks of pigments to keep on hand.
Guys I don't think most of yall realise that a lot of the fault is with photoshop. They could have easily matched the color to the relative hex value instead of turning everything black when Pantone support was removed
Yeah I don't understand this: I never worked with the Pantone "swatches" but weren't they just CMYK/RGB/Hex colour values, but with a Pantone "label" on them for easy look up & comparison to your physical swatches?
Did Adobe turn it black as some sort of political statement against Pantone? It seems like it was more effort than just removing the names/labelling in the code?
@@khdownes1 they were most likely trying to threaten Pantone to not leaving by talking Pantone user base hostage
colorpoly
Some smart person is going to simply create another system that's realistically affordable for single-designer firms.
Despite the number of pantone colors I use in my illustrator projects - this never actually happened to me. I can still see old files which used pantone colors and they're all still there.
Didn't they literally make a Kirby game about this? When can Kirby come beat the crap out of Pantone in real life? :(
I am pretty sure Pantone did not revoke the license. There are still basic colors of Pantone in Adobe Products, but Adobe didn‘t want to renew the license or pay more money or whatever so ADOBE decided to remove it.
Also what is misleading to a lot of people, it is not like all logos just turned black! Only when the before included Pantone colors were used directly by choosing e.g. „pantone red“ in Photoshop, did they actually get black after this change. You can still use the exact same color, but it is not called „pantone red“ now.
Pantone is only naming colors, it does not own them.
Nonetheless, pantones pricing seems a bit ridiculous. In the end, a lot of people don‘t buy the 9000$ book or similar, they just use the „digital colors“ as they send it off to print etc. So there is a reasoning behind making people pay for that as well.
I feel like if this was taken to court it would immediately be thrown into the public domain.
Pantone and Adobe are two companies that have a monopoly and charge what they think they can get away with. It started when Adobe decided to go down the subscription model route with no physical copies available.
I don't even know you for your minecraft videos but this was great
Then what do you know me from xd
@@CraftyMasterman This video. It was randomly recommended to me.
@@Redddragon pffff ok
As a graphic designer, I'M MAD, THIS IS AWFUL
As a graphic designer I'm 100% sure you don't even need pantone in your work. It looks like most people here you even don't understand what pantone is about
This is like the music industry trying to claim ownership over chord progressions.
Great video ! Glad I discovered your channel 👌
Gotta like that btd battles music
There's nothing stopping you creating a spot colour in your document and naming it the same way Pantone does. Then just find a website that lets you look up the Lab values for that colour.
This is the best video essay I have ever seen
Then you have not seen a good video essay
@@CraftysBunker “Pro colour yapper” is a peak analysis of Pantone, you do not realize your own genius/Half joking /It was still super entertaining to watch!
using the bloons and minecraft sounds was really good
God the AGONY of being a graphic designer for the first time at a print shop and slowly learning about why pantone is garbage!!!! I had to spend so much time making an account, but then it dropped the paywall on me only after showing the color library right in front of my face.
I was thinking, "no way i have to PAY for colors, and add the fee to my client's bill because of a fucking COLOR." But no, i do in fact have to pay for a color. The frick? Is this a joke? I just want the color blue!! Is that too much to ask? But noooooo they own allll the fucking colors now. Colors? Capitolism.
I wish i could pirate them, but that would be bad for the print shop lmaooooo
You don't have to use Pantone for anything. You do have to pay if you want to use their consistent color matching system.
@TunaIRL yeah, most of the time I don't. But once In a while I do.
@@TheOddHawk You know nothing is stopping you from marking a color as a spot color and naming it any pantone color? The print shop will know which color to use. The issue is, without a color reference fan, you don't know how that color will look anyway. So yes, you can "pirate" them. Whatever that means. It's not bad for anyone.
So no, they don't own any colors. They own the formulas for accurate color reproduction in print.
You should also make clear to the client that using Pantone will be more expensive. From creating the materials to them printing it. If your client isn't willing to do this, it makes no sense to offer it to them in the first place.
You're way exaggerating everything here.
@TunaIRL yeah, but heres the thing. I don't get a choice in these situations. I had to buy a subscription and use a specific Pantene color because I was told to do so. One of my orders was to fix a stupid pocket folder so that it could be outsourced and they kept giving us all these instructions so that it was taking forever to get it made and we were on a deadline.
They gave us specific Pantene names that they wanted us to use for the reds and blues. Adobe doesn't just let you color pick that crap. It converts to cmyk or rgb if you do. So no, I can't.
@@TheOddHawk You do not need to buy anything to do that. What you do is mark the color as a spot color and simply name it the pantone color you want it to be. The app is simply a luxury that makes finding stuff and creating swatches easier.
The color could be CMYK 100/0/0/0 in the file, with the name PMS RED 032 C and as a spot color, the print shop will know to use that specific pantone red in production.
This mostly seems like an issue with a lack of experience or knowledge in industry.
if a purchase isn't ownership then piracy isnt a crime!
Buying a book does not include the right to reprint and republish.
Thats cool, ill alsobe paying for the extended cut of this.
bloons background music ...... i love
Nah, this is crazy. I thought you could only *trademark* corpo colors in specific instances, not flat out remove colors for being the same flavor as someone's book.
That's not what it is. They only own the match between a name/identifier and how the color actually looks in real life. So for example "Pantone 13-1024" which is some Peach like color. They don't own that color, just the combination of the name and that color as a pair.
wow, a company being greedy making things worse for people??? that's crazy, kinda reminds me of the billion other times it happened. maybe there's some sort of structural issue, could even be the whole concept of more money equaling better... nah that can't be it
another day corporates being cartoon villains
"All their logos turned a solid black"
They did? Let me check my decade old pirated PS that works perfectly fine and never updates: Nope, colors are still here.
I can't imagine why any professional would use a subscription-based program, unless they're made to do so by their boss (in my experience no one cares what you use though). It's like having your organized desk, then every couple years the desk gets automatically re-arranged and two of your pen cups are gone, also there's a new measuring tape on the table you didn't ask for. Seems very counter-productive.
Crazy to put a couri image in your school project
listen thats a 3 year old psd file
@@CraftyMasterman couribruh dot PNG
Pantone as an idea is great. Too bad a greedy company has a monopoly on that idea. I hope an open source or more friendly version comes out.
Pantone has no monopoly on this idea. There are other color standards like the German RAL. Pantone is just the biggest player in the market.
@@huckleberryfinn6578 Yeah, I work for a PPG distributor and PPG has their own color libraries just like most companies that deal with colors.
Beautiful message at the end!!!
artists exist in a world where copyright makes their lives living hell yet think it protects them as independent creators.
to quote zack freedman, "these corrupted pseudo-human reptiles and their so-called intellectual property lawyers believe they can extract rent from anyone who uses the color 0x008E9A."
it's honestly on the same level as trying to copyright musical phrases or melodies, and i hope someone does something similar in response and generates all 16,777,216 possible RGB colors and puts it under creative commons.
Which video did he say that in?
not to yap but pantone isn't pretending to "own" colors or making you pay to use a hex code or whatever (and it pisses me off whenever i see someone say that omg comment section aaa). pantone owns, operates, and sells access to an infrastructure that ensures color fidelity across literally everywhere it's used, whether that is print, textiles, matte, etc., known as a color system. to put it simply, they own the recipes to color.
you CANNOT just go, hey, i want a shirt in color #ffff00. RGB, CMYK, etc. are color mixing models, which are NOT the same thing as a color system: they merely *represent/model* color, they aren't the actual pigments or lights that make color themselves. in RGB, #ffff00 is 100% red and 100% green: this does not represent a solid, concrete pigment though: computer screens (which RGB is made for, since that's how pixels work yada yada ya) will display #ffff00 in wildly different ways.
to tie this back to the shirt example, the producers of the yellow die in the shirt are working with physical pigments and the RGB model, used for screens, is not relevant at all. if i am a yellow shirt producer, i can use sooo many different ways to produce yellow, but i'd need a color system to ensure i am always producing a consistent color. the actual physical pigments will be much more complex than say, RGB. maybe i could used a synthetic dye? natural dyes like saffron?
as for printing, CMYK also has this problem. CMYK printers print tiny dots (cyan, magenta, yellow, black) to produce an illusion of the entire color spectrum (in the same way pixels do). as stated in this video, two printers with different inks may produce different colors. pantone also does spot inks, which instead of doing the tiny dot thing are actually the color themselves (printed money never uses CMYK printing)
pantone owns a monopoly on color systems. it has little to no real impact on people who are designers, but virtually EVERY designer uses them. that's why pantone fuckery is just that huge. unfortunately there aren't that many other non-commercial color systems out there and cynically, it's unlikely the US government is going to step in and regulate a really esoteric industry since monopoly-busting is rare nowadays
so a summary:
1) RGB, CMYK, etc. are NOT substitutes for a color system
2) a color system is used to ensure color fidelty. they provide the recipes for color
3) RGB, CMYK, etc. are *color mixing models*. they *represent* colors, but they are not the actual physical pigments or lights themselves. they are used in specific scenarios: rgb for screens and CMYK for printing. screens that use RGB and printers that use CMYK can field different color results even if they use the "same" color
this is too long lmao i could have made this a much smaller explanation.
tl;dr -- pantone is in the business of color recipes across a huge gamut of shit (print, matte, textiles) and deals with physical colors. there's nothing a hex code can do in lieu of physical design stuff
@@pinky_pepperkeep yappin bud, im sure Pantone will pay you handsomely to shill for them
@@sweetypuss Explaining to the people who have never dabbled in printing or design and just blindly hate because someone told them to == shilling for pantone
Copyright is truly in the top 3 of worst ideas humanity has ever come up with.
ChatGPT
Tidak, saya tidak setuju. Hak cipta memiliki peran penting dalam melindungi karya intelektual dan memberikan insentif bagi pencipta untuk terus berkarya. Tanpa hak cipta, banyak orang mungkin enggan untuk menghasilkan karya-karya kreatif karena takut karya mereka akan disalahgunakan atau dicuri tanpa izin. Hak cipta memberikan pemilik karya hak eksklusif untuk mengontrol penggunaan, reproduksi, dan distribusi karya mereka, sehingga memungkinkan mereka untuk memperoleh penghasilan dari karya mereka dan mendorong inovasi.
Namun, saya juga menyadari bahwa sistem hak cipta dapat memiliki kelemahan atau disalahgunakan dalam beberapa kasus. Misalnya, dalam beberapa situasi, hak cipta dapat digunakan untuk membatasi akses terhadap informasi yang penting atau karya-karya yang memiliki nilai sosial atau edukatif. Oleh karena itu, perlu ada keseimbangan antara perlindungan hak cipta dan kepentingan masyarakat umum dalam mengakses informasi dan budaya.
Jadi, sementara hak cipta tidak sempurna dan mungkin memerlukan reformasi, saya tidak setuju bahwa itu adalah salah satu dari tiga ide terburuk yang pernah dimiliki manusia.
Your skill is unprecedented. Bravo.
If paying for it doesn't mean you own it then piracy is legal
you butchered that quote so bad
0:51 “colour” ok Canadian
colour is british…
@@LimolaGaming and Canadian, which crafty is
@@LimolaGamingthis channel is canadian according to youtube about page
ok
“You will own nothing and you will be happy”
thank god im already a pirate and didnt lose access to COLOR of all things
Can't believe I live in a world where licencing colors is a thing.
Holy crap.
I used to work in commercial print, where everything was based on Pantone spot colours in your files.
I can’t imagine how much mess this caused.
Loved the use of bloons music
It seems it would be easy to replicate another spectrum division scheme and then name those specific frequency, etc.
Yohoho. Glad we're back in style, mateys
Thank you for not making this a 45 minute video
To give Pantone their credit, they do leave my hair 100% flake-free.
It’s always the things you make in a day that do the best
Pirates : "I don't have such weakness"