Saqifa Incident: Divided Sunni and Shia Perspectives | Islamic History

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ส.ค. 2024
  • Explore the depths of Islamic history of Sunni and Shia as we delve into a significant Islamic story - the Saqifa, a pivotal event in 632 AD. Witness the impact on the early Muslim community, facing uncertainty after Prophet Muhammad's death. Explore the vital question of leadership, shaping Islam's future. Delve into both Sunni and Shia perspectives, Saqifa's significance, and the emergence of Abu Bakr's leadership. Contrasting with the Shia view, discover the concept of divinely ordained leadership with Ali ibn Abi Talib. Unveil the Saqifa Incident's diverse interpretations and its lasting influence on Sunni and Shia beliefs.
    #islamichistory #saqifah #islamicstory
    --Subscribe to our channel for more videos on Islamic topics! www.youtube.co...
    --Share this video with your friends and family!
    --Let us know in the comments what you think about the meaning of life!
    -- Visit our Muslim clothing store! Explore our collection of stylish clothing that reflects the beauty of Islamic/Muslim culture. buyfaithwear.com
    ©Pondering Islam, 2023. All rights reserved. Any reproduction or republication of all or part of this video/audio is prohibited.

ความคิดเห็น • 19

  • @pamirhouse
    @pamirhouse 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    very beautiful video brother, can you tell how do you make the pictures?

    • @ponderingislam
      @ponderingislam  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hey, thank you. I use midjourney mostly. Sometimes, I create animation scenes using Blender (but that is very time-consuming and not worth it).

  • @Rubab786
    @Rubab786 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why don't people reveal the whole truth like gadeer why?

    • @ponderingislam
      @ponderingislam  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      People have a different interpretation of what happened on Ghadeer.

    • @Rubab786
      @Rubab786 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ponderingislam atleast reaveal the truth for people to do fikar

    • @ponderingislam
      @ponderingislam  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can make an argument based on what you believe happened. I provided an argument with references. You don't have to agree. 🙏

    • @masteronmace
      @masteronmace 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Except the event of Ghadeer is recorded exactly the same in Shia and Sunni tradition.

    • @ponderingislam
      @ponderingislam  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The event of Ghadeer is not in question as much as the interpretation of it.

  • @durdurdikir4021
    @durdurdikir4021 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Very Simple Logic of Human Mind...Will know and Agree the Second Version of This Story is not real and has a FALSEHOOD marks!!

    • @ponderingislam
      @ponderingislam  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I feel that we are imperfect beings hence it's not surprising to have different opinions of the past. The part that I always wondered is that if Imam Ali was the divine successor to the Prophet (as a caliph) then why didn't the Prophet mention something this important in the Quran? Imam Ali was alive throughout the whole revelation of the Quran throughout decades, not even his name was mentioned. I always pondered about.

    • @durdurdikir4021
      @durdurdikir4021 ปีที่แล้ว

      @ponderingislam Frankley...I Don't Associate anyone of them...I am Only A Muslim...As The Quran Declares...We Don't Have To Call ourselves different names or group...infect The Quran Condemned Such Grouping or Sects...Shaytan BIGGEST Policy is Divide and CONQUER!!!

    • @ponderingislam
      @ponderingislam  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That is true. The different names are more for identification purposes to let people know what they believe in. All this happened after the Prophet's death, it's the consequence of not having a divine leader available to guide.

    • @mvvx313
      @mvvx313 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ponderingislamAli is referenced in the quran multiple times

    • @ponderingislam
      @ponderingislam  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mvvx313 Salaam Alaikum. According to Shia's interpretation, he is referenced regarding successorship, but the majority do not agree. His name is not mentioned, hence 1400 years later we still debate about this subject matter.