Test firing 32 S&W Long and 107 year old ammo in my Swedish Nagant m 1887 revolver .

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ย. 2024
  • Test firing 32 s&w long in my Swedish and Russian Nagat revolvers .
    And a test if 107 year old ammo still works , and also a watermelon assasination . ( no other fruits or vegetables were hurt during recording ) .

ความคิดเห็น • 30

  • @tarstakars
    @tarstakars ปีที่แล้ว +3

    My revolver was made in1942 And I have put many rounds of .32 Smith and West long thru it and I've only had one failure to fire. Oddly the 7.62 ammunition hits high and to the right but the Smith and wesson 32 long hits at the point of aim

  • @olhemi1
    @olhemi1 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thank you for the video it was fun to watch you try them it was great that the old ammo still fired. 🙂☕👍

  • @robertrobert7924
    @robertrobert7924 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Were the 107 yro cartridges loaded with black powder or smokeless, and were the primers the old corrosive type. I have shot my Russian Nagant with new factory loaded nagant cartridges which had zero accuracy. I then reloaded them with a copper clad lead 7.62 wadcutter, and they shot well. So do .32 long lead round nose cartridges, but the brass does bulge slightly. I have found that American factory loaded .32 acp/7.65mm projectiles are undersized @.308 diameter. I reloaded them with .312 projectiles and they were accurate @25 yards in my .32 acp Colt 1903 Pistol and my 7.65mm 1914 Mauser Pistol. The .312 cartridges would not chamber in my 1970 West German Police Walther PP. I might try reolading with the 7.62 wadcutters and see if they work in the Walther accurately @25 yards.

    • @waffentobbe
      @waffentobbe  ปีที่แล้ว

      Blackpowder it's the m/87 cartridges whit paper wraping on the bullit .

  • @jonasdeejee890
    @jonasdeejee890 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    So I guess this proves the Swedish one is safe with smokeless loads? I read they were orginally meant for black powder

    • @rang123yea5
      @rang123yea5 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      They are initially. The thing is the more you fire the more power smokeless load through the less safe they become as the metal and structure of the gun fatigues. It's an any shot could be the last situation.

    • @NitroDubzzz
      @NitroDubzzz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rang123yea5 how long have you been shooting? Just curious

    • @rang123yea5
      @rang123yea5 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@NitroDubzzz I started with rifles and shotguns when I was 12 (I'm 50 ) I then got into handguns in the military. I've been collecting and Shooting old classic pistols for about 20 years. I have both the guns in this video was well as several others.

    • @NitroDubzzz
      @NitroDubzzz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rang123yea5 OK so you're some dumb old boomer. I don't need your fudlore

    • @rang123yea5
      @rang123yea5 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@NitroDubzzz actually I'm GenX your math sucks

  • @Mibit911
    @Mibit911 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've been wanting to do this with my Nagant because the ppu 7.62 ammo I have shoots high and left. But I hear Aguila 32 long shoots just right and I have alot of that for my Smith and wesson. Is there an issue with the forcing cone on the nagant? Could this cause issues? As far as I know the original nagant cartridges fit up inside the barrel before firing so there would be no forcing cone to hit right?

    • @waffentobbe
      @waffentobbe  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      So far i have not had any issues whit the 32 wadcutters only slight bulge on the brass .

  • @guccivanilla3691
    @guccivanilla3691 ปีที่แล้ว

    How has the nagant revolver been affected using 32 S&W Long after a few years? I just bought a nagant revolver and want to know if there are any other catridges i can use in the gun

    • @waffentobbe
      @waffentobbe  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i haven't seen any issues so far . you can make your own from 32-20 cartridge, there are videos on youtube how to make them .

  • @EdwinYee1
    @EdwinYee1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    the old one handed style lol

  • @elmsfeuer
    @elmsfeuer 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why did the gun fail to fire at 2.20?

    • @waffentobbe
      @waffentobbe  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hammer struck a empty chamber or the cartridge failed .

  • @viktordragovich94
    @viktordragovich94 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a question. What do you prefer for battlefield of WW1?

    • @waffentobbe
      @waffentobbe  ปีที่แล้ว

      A Tiger tank !! :)

    • @viktordragovich94
      @viktordragovich94 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@waffentobbe if going in this way better would be T80U/UD

    • @waffentobbe
      @waffentobbe  ปีที่แล้ว

      Guess i would go for the Madsen machine Gun

  • @user-co4rs7ob1t
    @user-co4rs7ob1t 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Судя по видео используемый боеприпас слабоват....арбуз стоит на месте.

    • @waffentobbe
      @waffentobbe  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's no 375 Magnum for sure :)

    • @user-co4rs7ob1t
      @user-co4rs7ob1t 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@waffentobbe да...357 ,магнум, арбуз одолеет.

    • @alexanderzatserkovniy8927
      @alexanderzatserkovniy8927 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Или такая дикая скорость, что арбуз не успевает реагировать😅

    • @RomanStudebaker
      @RomanStudebaker 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@alexanderzatserkovniy8927 патрон неродной потому что . Там барабан рассверлен под 8,2 мм свинцовую пулю и .32 SW калибр в таком барабане болтается туда сюда.

  • @junkemails5050
    @junkemails5050 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are these the same rifling twist rate as the russians nagants in 7.62 nagant revolvers?