Such a reverence and philia sofia. So deeply enriching and evoking so much valuable insights into Being. Thanks for walking me into wonder and a sense of awakening my recent unavoidable encounter with both Jung and Heidegger that in listening to Tom Cheetham and my reading of James Hilman ❤
Thanks you so much for briging attention to this work. I feel it's very resonate to Tom Cheetham work and James Hilman. This is, in my experience, opening up and evoking the daimon that demands the freedom of the imaginal realm and manifest it 🎉
Great conversation! I look forward to having the Grandfather experience and seeing what kind of me reveals itself. In the conversation, I particularly liked the notion: How to talk about context without content? To me, Dasein always already has a theme. A theme is a mode in which one can discuss context without needing specific content. When thinking with a theme, content will naturally arise, but there is a thinking through the theme first before the content appears. In this sense, one can strictly talk about the boundary conditions (or theme) of content without explicitly addressing the content itself. As the conversation you guys have pointed out, I think Heidegger wanted to address the ontological, which entails focusing on the context rather than the content.
Interesting talk, thanks. Short supplementay remark: In some respects, Edmund Husserl did even deeper “constructivstic“ studies than Martin Heidegger; only, his “meditations“ are even more difficult to read - and relatively abstract, whereas Carl Gustav Jung often got stuck, sometimes even lost in the “wood of symbols“ (V. Turner), So much interesting stuff, but, alas, “Ars longa, vita brevis!“ (Hippokrates) - Master Zhuang, similar - small wonder, Heidegger felt some spiritual relationship“.
Such a reverence and philia sofia. So deeply enriching and evoking so much valuable insights into Being. Thanks for walking me into wonder and a sense of awakening my recent unavoidable encounter with both Jung and Heidegger that in listening to Tom Cheetham and my reading of James Hilman ❤
Thanks you so much for briging attention to this work. I feel it's very resonate to Tom Cheetham work and James Hilman. This is, in my experience, opening up and evoking the daimon that demands the freedom of the imaginal realm and manifest it 🎉
Great conversation! I look forward to having the Grandfather experience and seeing what kind of me reveals itself. In the conversation, I particularly liked the notion: How to talk about context without content? To me, Dasein always already has a theme. A theme is a mode in which one can discuss context without needing specific content. When thinking with a theme, content will naturally arise, but there is a thinking through the theme first before the content appears. In this sense, one can strictly talk about the boundary conditions (or theme) of content without explicitly addressing the content itself. As the conversation you guys have pointed out, I think Heidegger wanted to address the ontological, which entails focusing on the context rather than the content.
Interesting talk, thanks.
Short supplementay remark: In some respects, Edmund Husserl did even deeper “constructivstic“ studies than Martin Heidegger; only, his “meditations“ are even more difficult to read - and relatively abstract, whereas Carl Gustav Jung often got stuck, sometimes even lost in the “wood of symbols“ (V. Turner), So much interesting stuff, but, alas, “Ars longa, vita brevis!“ (Hippokrates) - Master Zhuang, similar - small wonder, Heidegger felt some spiritual relationship“.