around 50 min feeling more comfortable in Nature, I'm watching this in between bouts of chop and drop in this incredibly lush soil building balance of allow and accept which furthers the contemplative while producing gain. Generally, circle becoming cone with fire and imaginal, and that objectified as spinning top one level or two level hourglass virtue and compromise/two kinds of freedom/self in individual and collective/asymmetric and symmetric time, cone mediating sphere to torus to disc that holds collective free will (sphere or trampoline) to cone transforms, that are accessible for the individual as free choice.
at 1hr 16, this seems like how contemplation can avoid a bad match where the procedural is gathered into the propositional, sort of the difference between an alcoholic zombie who contemplates everything thus nothing, and an old but playable shed sized musical entity, with that contemplative pedagogy affording the band of squirrels that find it lost in the woods. Or, how a group can be cohesive as procedural then that power is co-opted, subsumed into the propositional which distracts participatory focus, perspective becomes one level and thus awareness eddies, an objectification avoided by things like right placed rituals that unfold as care, and the tri-corner relational marriage that allows a more local version of that objectification, if focused will move with fire into the pyramid, then that spins up to the cone. Whew, long day. Thanks Guy.
Sāgaradevī is awesome, and this was a wonderful discussion! I love the idea that it’s a “good sign” when we feel the world can’t be put back together, and I also love the notion that “intimacy isn’t safe at all.” That’s so great, and it is indeed very mysterious to “know when the painting is done.” That was a great insight, and this talk had a lot of insights like that I hope to take with me, including the connection between nihilism and closed spaces, the way in which it is something “beyond me” that pulls me into questioning, the way in which I somehow know to be interested in a mystery that’s not entirely here, the feeling that an area of great learning is where there is constantly a feeling for another distinction…Really, really rich discussion. Thank you both!
The third triple set as tri-cornered hat marriage between 3 people, in law or otherwise, that connects the through line of family, trade and sacred on that language level and the three leaps of faith, reason and love. Put a new level of resilience where two people disagreeing can be mediated by a third, or where the loss of one is not such a hard place to re-emerge from. An evolved common sense level? In addition to couples and individuals.
to put a different spin on 45 min to 50 min where it's about drawing ethical frameworks out of stress and knowledge producing frames: circles on two (virtuous and compromise) levels that are connected with triangular hats that can align differently, and purposefully in a contemplative way by the three leaps from that After Socrates Kierkgaard video. One hat contains family, trade and sacred language mentioned by Jordan Hall. Another has allow and assert, and contemplate as the balance of the other two, where allow is an action that unfolds knowledge without stress unlike the "assert" which tends to objectify and slide between levels, makes one level out of two. Like all knowledge from stress becomes memory so needs recording which moves to permission from the stadium owner to scapegoat collective crowd and individual, for instance the objectification of Christians vs lions, the crowd response predicted and managed, that negative mood enhancement assuaged. None of it intelligent...yo yo's all the way down! The two freedoms, misplaced by objectification misaligned, in a frame like ancient Rome of permissions, scapegoats, and objects in a three card monte way which is without blame yet needs correcting. Simply put, mimicking and entering from an initial circle into a triangle afforded the fire of multidimensional expansion and introduced the two world mythology. Eating that part of the gradient entered humanity into a triangle with grass as the most powerful, which also self suffocates and needs herd, which needs pack, which needs hierarchy. One hand as a fist with grass form (viscous, sticky, powerful yet self stifling) like a talon grasping a ball, the other hand with seven fingers that open into flowers, brain as leaf for photosynthesis. Seven radically different responses within the body, that system connected to the world systems. Somewhat different than that triangle, this is mimicking birds in their calling and connecting, sounding off with info in an intelligent expansion and contraction. Birds did something new, humans haven't yet. Thank you Dr Barratt!
around 50 min feeling more comfortable in Nature, I'm watching this in between bouts of chop and drop in this incredibly lush soil building balance of allow and accept which furthers the contemplative while producing gain. Generally, circle becoming cone with fire and imaginal, and that objectified as spinning top one level or two level hourglass virtue and compromise/two kinds of freedom/self in individual and collective/asymmetric and symmetric time, cone mediating sphere to torus to disc that holds collective free will (sphere or trampoline) to cone transforms, that are accessible for the individual as free choice.
at 1hr 16, this seems like how contemplation can avoid a bad match where the procedural is gathered into the propositional, sort of the difference between an alcoholic zombie who contemplates everything thus nothing, and an old but playable shed sized musical entity, with that contemplative pedagogy affording the band of squirrels that find it lost in the woods. Or, how a group can be cohesive as procedural then that power is co-opted, subsumed into the propositional which distracts participatory focus, perspective becomes one level and thus awareness eddies, an objectification avoided by things like right placed rituals that unfold as care, and the tri-corner relational marriage that allows a more local version of that objectification, if focused will move with fire into the pyramid, then that spins up to the cone. Whew, long day. Thanks Guy.
Sāgaradevī is awesome, and this was a wonderful discussion! I love the idea that it’s a “good sign” when we feel the world can’t be put back together, and I also love the notion that “intimacy isn’t safe at all.” That’s so great, and it is indeed very mysterious to “know when the painting is done.” That was a great insight, and this talk had a lot of insights like that I hope to take with me, including the connection between nihilism and closed spaces, the way in which it is something “beyond me” that pulls me into questioning, the way in which I somehow know to be interested in a mystery that’s not entirely here, the feeling that an area of great learning is where there is constantly a feeling for another distinction…Really, really rich discussion. Thank you both!
Thanks for the lovely comment 😊. I was quite anxious about doing this so really appreciate it 💜
@@Sagaradevi You did a wonderful job! I really enjoyed everything you shared and have been thinking about it ever sense. Really great work!
The third triple set as tri-cornered hat marriage between 3 people, in law or otherwise, that connects the through line of family, trade and sacred on that language level and the three leaps of faith, reason and love. Put a new level of resilience where two people disagreeing can be mediated by a third, or where the loss of one is not such a hard place to re-emerge from. An evolved common sense level? In addition to couples and individuals.
to put a different spin on 45 min to 50 min where it's about drawing ethical frameworks out of stress and knowledge producing frames: circles on two (virtuous and compromise) levels that are connected with triangular hats that can align differently, and purposefully in a contemplative way by the three leaps from that After Socrates Kierkgaard video. One hat contains family, trade and sacred language mentioned by Jordan Hall. Another has allow and assert, and contemplate as the balance of the other two, where allow is an action that unfolds knowledge without stress unlike the "assert" which tends to objectify and slide between levels, makes one level out of two. Like all knowledge from stress becomes memory so needs recording which moves to permission from the stadium owner to scapegoat collective crowd and individual, for instance the objectification of Christians vs lions, the crowd response predicted and managed, that negative mood enhancement assuaged. None of it intelligent...yo yo's all the way down! The two freedoms, misplaced by objectification misaligned, in a frame like ancient Rome of permissions, scapegoats, and objects in a three card monte way which is without blame yet needs correcting.
Simply put, mimicking and entering from an initial circle into a triangle afforded the fire of multidimensional expansion and introduced the two world mythology. Eating that part of the gradient entered humanity into a triangle with grass as the most powerful, which also self suffocates and needs herd, which needs pack, which needs hierarchy. One hand as a fist with grass form (viscous, sticky, powerful yet self stifling) like a talon grasping a ball, the other hand with seven fingers that open into flowers, brain as leaf for photosynthesis. Seven radically different responses within the body, that system connected to the world systems. Somewhat different than that triangle, this is mimicking birds in their calling and connecting, sounding off with info in an intelligent expansion and contraction. Birds did something new, humans haven't yet.
Thank you Dr Barratt!
Thanks for all the thoughtful points and your engagement in the conversation 😊