@@goodyeoman4534 They be compelled to do something about it, given the staff are on camera committing a Section 5 Public Order Offence (harassment/intimidation), a Section 44 Series Crime Act 2007 Offence (encouraging an offence), and a Section 1 Theft Act offence (attempted theft).
Must admit that the people involved were well over the top with their actions. But then again you got the reaction you crave to make your silly videos. You never show us the boring videos you make when no one reacts to you filming . Think that speaks volumes to what your up to.
Black guy commits section 4 public order act offence..... A person is guilty of an offence if he-uses towards another person threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or distributes or displays to another person any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting, with intent to cause that person to believe that immediate unlawful violence will be used against him or another by any person, or to provoke the immediate use of unlawful violence by that person or another, or whereby that person is likely to believe that such violence will be used or it is likely that such violence will be provoked.
I did like this comment but unfortunately we're all guilty of public order offences in the eyes of British police and those two would be allowed get away with it so this is a horrible card to play
Not only a Karen, but a chav Karen. And not only a bodyguard, but a bodyguard who failed to intimidate an elder member of our community. The man should considerer himself a disgrace to men in general as real men don't attempt to bully the vulnerable, and the company in particular.
The sheer audacity of this woman is beyond belief, has she ever visited a supermarket and asked them to stop filming her because it breaches her civil liberties. She seriously needs to wind her neck in and stop trying to impose her will upon innocent members of the public. Also what was she doing pointing her mobile phone at this auditor - no doubt breaching GDPR regulations.
She didn't care whether KAUK had a right to film or not, she simply wanted to exert her authority and make herself look like a victim - even though she chose to approach a member of the public and [try to] give them orders.
f she was on duty and /or it was a corporate phone then GDPR would apply. That she introduced herself as a member of europa staff could also mean GDPR applies even it it was a personal phone. I would ask europa for a copy (under GDPR) leaving this person to explain their conduct to their employer.
NO he needs to go into the company, ask for a owner, show the recording, then ask "Do you want us to treat you like that, come up and threaten to take your stuff?, if not then what are you going to do about it now." Someone walked up to me demanding my camera, he would meet ground and stay with it.
The staff are committing a number of offences in this video e.g: i. Section 5 Public Order Offence (harassment & intimidation). ii. Section 44 Serious Crime Act 2007 (when she told her colleague to steal KAUK's camera). iii. Section 1 Theft Act (when the said colleague attempted to steal KAUK's camera). KAUK should submit this as video evidence to the Police.
This was very educational - I was not previously aware that - "You can not video people for no reason at all, you need to have a reason for it" (07.45). What an interesting statute. That woman should give tutorials on the Law.
Please forward this to her company and get that man prosecuted for threatening, section 33 of the criminal justice act says you can film. Pinac and thank you for auditing and showing us
The staff are committing a number of offences in this video e.g: i. Section 5 Public Order Offence (harassment & intimidation). ii. Section 44 Serious Crime Act 2007 (when she told her colleague to steal KAUK's camera). iii. Section 1 Theft Act (when the said colleague attempted to steal KAUK's camera). KAUK should submit this as video evidence to the Police.
Find out who he/she works for..write to his/her 'Boss/CEO' explaining what transpired and what evidence you hold to back up your Complaint and mention you intend to proceed with Civil Action against the Company....the 'Boss/CEO' will trip over himself in an effort to smooth things over rather than have his company have the bad publicity of a Court Summons to contend with....respect KA.
The staff are committing a number of offences in this video e.g: i. Section 5 Public Order Offence (harassment & intimidation). ii. Section 44 Serious Crime Act 2007 (when she told her colleague to steal KAUK's camera). iii. Section 1 Theft Act (when the said colleague attempted to steal KAUK's camera). KAUK should submit this as video evidence to the Police.
She said about leave it to security. She should have done that at the start stupid. Gobby cow. If you was that much of a danger. Then why did they come out. Only because they wanted to assert their little bit of authority that they don’t have. Well done Kent audits. Great job mate
@Don't Shoot The staff are committing a number of offences in this video e.g: i. Section 5 Public Order Offence (harassment & intimidation). ii. Section 44 Serious Crime Act 2007 (when she told her colleague to steal KAUK's camera). iii. Section 1 Theft Act (when the said colleague attempted to steal KAUK's camera). KAUK should submit this as video evidence to the Police.
Did she even draw breath? Imagine working for her! So triggered, telling employees to take your property, spouting utterly deluded laws. She needs a brain rewire 😳
The staff are committing a number of offences in this video e.g: i. Section 5 Public Order Offence (harassment & intimidation). ii. Section 44 Serious Crime Act 2007 (when she told her colleague to steal KAUK's camera). iii. Section 1 Theft Act (when the said colleague attempted to steal KAUK's camera). KAUK should submit this as video evidence to the Police.
The staff are committing a number of offences in this video e.g: i. Section 5 Public Order Offence (harassment & intimidation). ii. Section 44 Serious Crime Act 2007 (when she told her colleague to steal KAUK's camera). iii. Section 1 Theft Act (when the said colleague attempted to steal KAUK's camera). KAUK should submit this as video evidence to the Police.
I have a feeling that retainment of staff is difficult with a high turnover in her office - unless of course they have a hearing aid which can be turned off
Using threats of violence to take your property is attempted robbery. It matters NOT if the property is taken or not. Its still robbery. On the person in the long coat. Does someone actually employ them ? Really ?
Correct. Section 1 of the Theft Act. She is also guilty of an offence under Section 44 of the Serious Crime Act 2007, i.e., encouraging someone to commit an offence.
Big hard man needs educating. Trying to bully a veteran doing nothing wrong. He's not worthy enough to lace Kent's boots. Why was the ignorant fook trying to infringe on his rights? Wow, the world has gone mad.
@@risingstorm4239 He's on camera committing attempted theft under Section 1 of the Theft Act. KAUK should submit this footage to the Police and report a crime.
My word, that woman seems like she needs some help with her mental health. She's walking up to members of the public going about the day and accosting them. Phone the Police the next time, for your own protection. She really didn't appear stable, God love her.
Odds are 100 to 1 that she is not married !! And the big "Doofus" crowds up to the photographer and then demands him to "get the camera out of my face" ! ( Idiocy is truly worldwide !)
This started out as an hilarious Karen displaying her ignorance of the law then it turned nasty with that goon approaching you like that. I’d have clobbered that idiot for getting that close. He was way out of order. Well done for keeping your cool but that was a an offence of affray, technical assault and hindrance of free movement.
Spoke to a very nice but stressed out lady on phone reception. Under instructions to fob off calls to an outsourced pr company Perhaps ill look on companies house for the directors contact info and see what they have to say
Dear Kent Audits, I'm so so sorry you were treated by this by these vile criminals - one inciting an assault on you and one actually committing on. I do so hope you're OK - I realise you're a highly principled, strong willed man as well as a gentleman, but NOBODY should have to put up with that. With very best wishes and in admiration and solidarity from South Wales.
oh the ironic of it all,theres about a million cameras in the UK watching your every move but a karen throws a hissy fit over one camera you cant make this stuff up !
Terrible representation of Europa. Badly informed staff issuing instructions while in public, topped off with a goon’s intimidation tactics. Please Europa reassure the public this is not how you conduct business.
Europa "values" according to their website :- "Team spirit, *acting reasonably* and driving out complexity are just a few of our priorities and are part of everything we do."
I feel there is a great need to educate the British people at an early age on the present laws of the land especially in respect to photography in the public domain. Keep up the great work and stay safe.
How many times I say something the more he has to listen.😂🤣😂 Little Britain has come true 20 years on yer but no but. As for the bloke stating your camera will get broken is that not a threat section 5.
So little miss (hope I’m right) doesn’t like the answer to her question (it’s not the answer she wants) she just keeps asking, very in entitled, self important thing and that’s putting it mildly. Her trained chimp needs to know he, by his own (recorded) actions has committed deliberately causing alarm and distress as well as threatening theft and criminal damage. This is harassment at the top end.
What a complete joke/karen/and embarrassment to herself and the company she represents. The black guy Jonnie concrete laughing hard man, needs a wake up call
God her voice was really annoying the hell out of me..... I think I should head down to Dartford, would be a totally different interaction, I wouldn't have been so calm... Great video mate..
Silly Karen. When you drive there with a dash cam you take a picture of "private" vehicles on "private" ground! Couldn't quite catch what that security bloke said. Did he say " I will smash your camera in your face"? Imagine saying that to him. Plod would have taken you away for a "hate or racist "crime. One law for some and no law for our friends from abroad here to enrich us.
UK women have perfected the raised whiny voice. Imagine her in the throws of passion "!!tell me why! you're coming! so quickly!! !!what's the !!reason?!?!!!"
I believe that if they didn’t want to be filmed it would have been better for them to ask in a polite manner to refrain from filming and they could have asked politely if you could leave that area but instead they acted antisocial and tried to bully and chase you out of the area. They threatened with getting security even though they never came and it should have been securities job in the first place to be asking people to leave private property and besides I think the security guards would have dealt with the situation in a much better way than that manager who tried to bully you with who I am assume is her daughter and her daughters boyfriend (seems very unprofessional from that manager)
Well done Kent, keep kicking ass. Imagine the poor juniors who have to work under these types. Business culture gives them some title of seniority and they instantly take on the role of Police.
YOU HAD TO MENTION THATS HE IS BLACK BECAUSE YOUR RACIST HES THE ONLY MALE THERE COULD HAVE EASILY IDENTIFIED HIM BY THAT INSTEAD YOU CHOSE TO DESCRIBE HIM AS BLACK. WELLE SEE HOW MUCH YOUR WORKPLACE LIKES THIS
were do you find all these law knowing people from kent bet she was bullied at school you have enough the report the fella the tried to move you camera did security move you ??
Well that Karen was an embarrassment wasnt she ??? She loved the sound of that awful voice of hers lol. THEN takes her phone out and does EXACTLY what she says you cant do by law ! ! Jesus wept . I hope she sees this
Find out who is the person in charge of that company and either send a copy or a link to the video, telling them your email address and your intention to inform the police, and your intention to prosecute the two people for their threatening behavior to yourself. Tell the manager by law the female has to provide you with a copy of the video/photos she took as that is a GDPR offense and also evidence in your case against the two individuals. Tell them the only way to prevent this action would be for them both to apologise to you personally on camera.
Send this to head office detailing the relevant legislation
Yes Nice Reply !!!
As if they'd do a thing about it.
@@goodyeoman4534 They be compelled to do something about it, given the staff are on camera committing a Section 5 Public Order Offence (harassment/intimidation), a Section 44 Series Crime Act 2007 Offence (encouraging an offence), and a Section 1 Theft Act offence (attempted theft).
I am sure Europa will not be amused at the behaviour of their staff acting in a threateneing manner towards law abiding members of the public
I've contacted the company about it and maybe others can do the same
God that screeching , I think my ears are bleeding . So Europa lovely staff you have there 🤢
@@jbc1829 Same sent a few emails, everyone should
Must admit that the people involved were well over the top with their actions. But then again you got the reaction you crave to make your silly videos. You never show us the boring videos you make when no one reacts to you filming . Think that speaks volumes to what your up to.
@@michaelmoran9399 Get out, clown lol
Black guy commits section 4 public order act offence..... A person is guilty of an offence if he-uses towards another person threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or distributes or displays to another person any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting, with intent to cause that person to believe that immediate unlawful violence will be used against him or another by any person, or to provoke the immediate use of unlawful violence by that person or another, or whereby that person is likely to believe that such violence will be used or it is likely that such violence will be provoked.
"...or to provoke the immediate use of unlawful violence by that person or another..."
Sounds like she may be answerable too.
I did like this comment but unfortunately we're all guilty of public order offences in the eyes of British police and those two would be allowed get away with it so this is a horrible card to play
No he's OK because he's black they can do what they want only applies to white English minority down there.
He's above the law in this country.
He will get away with it because of black privilege
Not only a Karen, but a chav Karen. And not only a bodyguard, but a bodyguard who failed to intimidate an elder member of our community. The man should considerer himself a disgrace to men in general as real men don't attempt to bully the vulnerable, and the company in particular.
Showing off in front of the Karen
That guy needs to meet my friend, double-tap
@@geoff9614 he was hoping to get wet after
A horrible woman.
Both as vile as each other. Scatty brained Karen and a gap-toothed Neanderthal.
The sheer audacity of this woman is beyond belief, has she ever visited a supermarket and asked them to stop filming her because it breaches her civil liberties. She seriously needs to wind her neck in and stop trying to impose her will upon innocent members of the public. Also what was she doing pointing her mobile phone at this auditor - no doubt breaching GDPR regulations.
She didn't care whether KAUK had a right to film or not, she simply wanted to exert her authority and make herself look like a victim - even though she chose to approach a member of the public and [try to] give them orders.
@@mousecoder1306 her so called authority ends at the gate and fence of their property.
It always makes me laugh when people demand they not be videoed rather than stop the behaviour that causes them to be videoed in the first place
need to go back there. but need more auditors to go with me
Need a mass audit
You're supposed to be an auditor!! The clues in your channel name mate!!!!!
💯 This needs a mast audit ASAP.
Why not team up with Alfie Audits again? He is putting out some good content lately and he would love this Karen no doubt. 😂
Kent Audit uk needs an auditor 🤔
You need to ask for a copy of her phone footage under GDPR law, seeing that she was at work filming you. Stand your ground.
f she was on duty and /or it was a corporate phone then GDPR would apply.
That she introduced herself as a member of europa staff could also mean GDPR applies even it it was a personal phone.
I would ask europa for a copy (under GDPR) leaving this person to explain their conduct to their employer.
NO he needs to go into the company, ask for a owner, show the recording, then ask "Do you want us to treat you like that, come up and threaten to take your stuff?, if not then what are you going to do about it now."
Someone walked up to me demanding my camera, he would meet ground and stay with it.
@@davecarter2508 and tell them it’s on TH-cam
@@piggypiggypig1746 Several people have emailed them to tell them, it's going viral.
@@mousecoder1306ant reply’s?
Threats of violence and intimidation should be reported to the police,who do these people think they are?
He's black; they wouldn't even write down the complaint, let alone do anything about it. Gutless job's-worths in uniform.
It’ll fall on deaf ears…police don’t give a shit if auditors are assaulted.
The staff are committing a number of offences in this video e.g:
i. Section 5 Public Order Offence (harassment & intimidation).
ii. Section 44 Serious Crime Act 2007 (when she told her colleague to steal KAUK's camera).
iii. Section 1 Theft Act (when the said colleague attempted to steal KAUK's camera).
KAUK should submit this as video evidence to the Police.
She is very important, you should pay attention when she speaks, not, two words would clear up her authority, FOXTROT OSCAR.
FO you four-eyed hag!
Well said son 👏
This was very educational - I was not previously aware that - "You can not video people for no reason at all, you need to have a reason for it" (07.45). What an interesting statute. That woman should give tutorials on the Law.
Yep back to the dishes honey there’s a love😂
why do we get filmed every where lol .
@@christinedin8515 why have we allowed it to happen I will never know.
You can tell by her demeanour and shrill shrieking that she was a school bully when younger.
If anyone walks up on your personal space like that (except police) preemptive strike allowed
What a simply gorgeous mellifluous voice.
Yuk, what a mess!
All that drama for something that looks like a psychedelic gargle.
I've never actually heard the sound of a cat being skinned alive over a hot fire. But if I did, this is how i'd imagine it would sound.
Please forward this to her company and get that man prosecuted for threatening, section 33 of the criminal justice act says you can film. Pinac and thank you for auditing and showing us
The staff are committing a number of offences in this video e.g:
i. Section 5 Public Order Offence (harassment & intimidation).
ii. Section 44 Serious Crime Act 2007 (when she told her colleague to steal KAUK's camera).
iii. Section 1 Theft Act (when the said colleague attempted to steal KAUK's camera).
KAUK should submit this as video evidence to the Police.
s33 says nothing about filming
Find out who he/she works for..write to his/her 'Boss/CEO' explaining what transpired and what evidence you hold to back up your Complaint and mention you intend to proceed with Civil Action against the Company....the 'Boss/CEO' will trip over himself in an effort to smooth things over rather than have his company have the bad publicity of a Court Summons to contend with....respect KA.
Well done Kent Audit for standing up to these pathetic bullies. 👍🏻😎
The staff are committing a number of offences in this video e.g:
i. Section 5 Public Order Offence (harassment & intimidation).
ii. Section 44 Serious Crime Act 2007 (when she told her colleague to steal KAUK's camera).
iii. Section 1 Theft Act (when the said colleague attempted to steal KAUK's camera).
KAUK should submit this as video evidence to the Police.
She said about leave it to security. She should have done that at the start stupid. Gobby cow. If you was that much of a danger. Then why did they come out. Only because they wanted to assert their little bit of authority that they don’t have. Well done Kent audits. Great job mate
Ignorant of the law. Karen walks up towards the camera and demands you not to video her, unbelievable.
@Don't Shoot The staff are committing a number of offences in this video e.g:
i. Section 5 Public Order Offence (harassment & intimidation).
ii. Section 44 Serious Crime Act 2007 (when she told her colleague to steal KAUK's camera).
iii. Section 1 Theft Act (when the said colleague attempted to steal KAUK's camera).
KAUK should submit this as video evidence to the Police.
On the blob this month
Did she even draw breath? Imagine working for her! So triggered, telling employees to take your property, spouting utterly deluded laws. She needs a brain rewire 😳
The staff are committing a number of offences in this video e.g:
i. Section 5 Public Order Offence (harassment & intimidation).
ii. Section 44 Serious Crime Act 2007 (when she told her colleague to steal KAUK's camera).
iii. Section 1 Theft Act (when the said colleague attempted to steal KAUK's camera).
KAUK should submit this as video evidence to the Police.
Woman's an idiot.
FOXTROT OSCAR comes to mind.
Love your work.
Keep it up
Good Ole Yardley Ski,….just a doll.
"Getta me offa that camera"......"you cannot video private property".............proper chavvy Karen there! Seems security thought she was mad too!
She also reached a pitch in her voice only dogs could hear.
What was that? A screechy harridan you say?
Yes,you're right..........
This is really sinister you should have called 999 and consider legally available self defence items
hahahahaha legal self defence in the UK, best joke ive heard in a while !
The staff are committing a number of offences in this video e.g:
i. Section 5 Public Order Offence (harassment & intimidation).
ii. Section 44 Serious Crime Act 2007 (when she told her colleague to steal KAUK's camera).
iii. Section 1 Theft Act (when the said colleague attempted to steal KAUK's camera).
KAUK should submit this as video evidence to the Police.
What a horrible Karen and a possible case for assault on you from that guy.
Not that the police would help.
This needs to be sent to the Head office...this is totally unacceptable...even better many people to send this to the HQ
This is one special Karen.😂 I feel sorry for anyone who deals with her on a regular basis.
Women like this are the reason women live longer than men, i.e., any man married to someone like this, simply wants to die as soon as possible.
I have a feeling that retainment of staff is difficult with a high turnover in her office - unless of course they have a hearing aid which can be turned off
Using threats of violence to take your property is attempted robbery.
It matters NOT if the property is taken or not.
Its still robbery.
On the person in the long coat.
Does someone actually employ them ?
Really ?
Correct. Section 1 of the Theft Act. She is also guilty of an offence under Section 44 of the Serious Crime Act 2007, i.e., encouraging someone to commit an offence.
Big hard man needs educating. Trying to bully a veteran doing nothing wrong. He's not worthy enough to lace Kent's boots. Why was the ignorant fook trying to infringe on his rights? Wow, the world has gone mad.
Ooh Karen’s found herself a knight in shining armour. Bully!
Lol, wasn't he just so chivalrous
@@risingstorm4239 He's on camera committing attempted theft under Section 1 of the Theft Act. KAUK should submit this footage to the Police and report a crime.
A knight nooo way
I thought it was her pimp…
My word, that woman seems like she needs some help with her mental health. She's walking up to members of the public going about the day and accosting them. Phone the Police the next time, for your own protection. She really didn't appear stable, God love her.
HAVE HER COMMITTED IMMEDIATELY
Thank you K.A.
She really asks for a mass audit
Yes she does and the bootlicking Human
What a nasty Karen…….dangerous and aggressive…as for her bully boy he needs to be arrested for his threatening behaviour and demeanour ….
He was a big boy, sticking up for the Karen, soon backed down though didn't he , when faced with someone who was not intimidated by him. What a woose
Well done standing your ground.
A flash mob of auditors would be nice!
Her mind was racing over her ability to think logically.
Odds are 100 to 1 that she is not married !! And the big "Doofus" crowds up to the photographer and then demands him to "get the camera out of my face" ! ( Idiocy is truly worldwide !)
The office bike. Need some support down there.
and the office bad man... aka coward that picks on old men
Needed to call the police. Doing nothing encourages people like that to keep bullying.
We need a re-visit! soon. Crazy lady
an other one to avoid LADS.
So, threats of violence and bodily harm are allowed?
“Off of that camera”.
How incredibly Kent
This started out as an hilarious Karen displaying her ignorance of the law then it turned nasty with that goon approaching you like that. I’d have clobbered that idiot for getting that close. He was way out of order. Well done for keeping your cool but that was a an offence of affray, technical assault and hindrance of free movement.
Spoke to a very nice but stressed out lady on phone reception. Under instructions to fob off calls to an outsourced pr company
Perhaps ill look on companies house for the directors contact info and see what they have to say
Where on earth makes her and others believe you cannot film in public, we do not live in North Korea
that's what people believe when they think the world revolves around them, misplaced sense of self-importance
Dear Kent Audits,
I'm so so sorry you were treated by this by these vile criminals - one inciting an assault on you and one actually committing on.
I do so hope you're OK - I realise you're a highly principled, strong willed man as well as a gentleman, but NOBODY should have to put up with that.
With very best wishes and in admiration and solidarity from South Wales.
oh the ironic of it all,theres about a million cameras in the UK watching your every move but a karen throws a hissy fit over one camera you cant make this stuff up !
ok all the auditors from down south go there and show them its legal
Amazing close-up footage of the security's big gut - what my grandpa used to call a "guzunder" pair of trousers!
Terrible representation of Europa.
Badly informed staff issuing instructions while in public, topped off with a goon’s intimidation tactics.
Please Europa reassure the public this is not how you conduct business.
I'm sure someone will have a word with them!...
She approaches like a mother talking to a neighbours kid. Why is she wearing a sleeping bag.
Who is this woman, what’s her name, where does she work. We all need to contact her employer she’s out of control.
Always amazes me when they walk up to the camera and say they don't like being filmed 🤦
Now we know what the cast of TOWIE are doing now.
Europa "values" according to their website :-
"Team spirit, *acting reasonably* and driving out complexity are just a few of our priorities and are part of everything we do."
I feel there is a great need to educate the British people at an early age on the present laws of the land especially in respect to photography in the public domain.
Keep up the great work and stay safe.
Would be great if folks near there pay them a visit and film lawfully from the public road, until they get the message, some people are truly deluded.
Does her name begin with a ‘K’ by any chance?
I think her initials might be C.S. The gentleman of colour deserved a good slapping.
No, it begins with C and ends with T.
🤣🤣
I pity her man,,,,and the hard guy Bling King,, giving it the mouth.👍🏴🤣
How many times I say something the more he has to listen.😂🤣😂 Little Britain has come true 20 years on yer but no but. As for the bloke stating your camera will get broken is that not a threat section 5.
Just spare a moment for Karens husband . Poor poor fella ,
You get within arm's reach of me you're on the ground.
This one is going all out for karen of the year screeching and holding a camera while she is filming! What is wrong with people today ?
That guy was very lucky, his obsequiousness to the harpy, didn't land him in some serious shit.
Gobby mare! Common as muck!
I can see why Europa only have 2.2 stars on Trustpilot.
Refreshing to see that you don't have to come over on a dinghy to be ignorant of the law. 🤣
Liked and followed 👍🏻, watching now👍🏻
Welcome aboard!
wow. should have called the police yourself ! Threat of violence to your property and yourself.
Sadly the police will side with the business, they'll also do the" why? why"? Routine, then do nothing.......
Karen and roadman giving it large
Thick as two short planks when her family see this it will make them very proud
So little miss (hope I’m right) doesn’t like the answer to her question (it’s not the answer she wants) she just keeps asking, very in entitled, self important thing and that’s putting it mildly. Her trained chimp needs to know he, by his own (recorded) actions has committed deliberately causing alarm and distress as well as threatening theft and criminal damage. This is harassment at the top end.
Because you can is a perfectly good reason.
Big audit needed there
What a complete joke/karen/and embarrassment to herself and the company she represents.
The black guy Jonnie concrete laughing hard man, needs a wake up call
God her voice was really annoying the hell out of me..... I think I should head down to Dartford, would be a totally different interaction, I wouldn't have been so calm... Great video mate..
Wow,that lady is painful
I bet that company would be soooo happy if it was audited every week! There's an idea!
Silly Karen. When you drive there with a dash cam you take a picture of "private" vehicles on "private" ground!
Couldn't quite catch what that security bloke said. Did he say " I will smash your camera in your face"? Imagine saying that to him. Plod would have taken you away for a "hate or racist "crime.
One law for some and no law for our friends from abroad here to enrich us.
UK women have perfected the raised whiny voice. Imagine her in the throws of passion "!!tell me why! you're coming! so quickly!! !!what's the !!reason?!?!!!"
Can you imagine being married to THAT!!!! Poor love doesn't know the law. Thought she was gonna combust😂😂😂 Bet her name is KAREN.
Not just being married, but her being your gf lol
I believe that if they didn’t want to be filmed it would have been better for them to ask in a polite manner to refrain from filming and they could have asked politely if you could leave that area but instead they acted antisocial and tried to bully and chase you out of the area. They threatened with getting security even though they never came and it should have been securities job in the first place to be asking people to leave private property and besides I think the security guards would have dealt with the situation in a much better way than that manager who tried to bully you with who I am assume is her daughter and her daughters boyfriend (seems very unprofessional from that manager)
Is that a duvet she is wearing ?
Well done Kent, keep kicking ass. Imagine the poor juniors who have to work under these types. Business culture gives them some title of seniority and they instantly take on the role of Police.
Golden wonder
She was absolutely clueless, acting like a prick, great video, stay safe, retired, lifeboatman
A bulldog chewing a wasp comes to mind 😂
Can you imagine living with that thing..OMG.
When is the mast audit happening?
Do ya have a number for company mate ? any names as gonna give em a call
01322 474000
Someone local needs t go slap the black guy. Why didn't you report him to police
Nothing would happen anyway, whites are second class citizens
YOU HAD TO MENTION THATS HE IS BLACK BECAUSE YOUR RACIST HES THE ONLY MALE THERE COULD HAVE EASILY IDENTIFIED HIM BY THAT INSTEAD YOU CHOSE TO DESCRIBE HIM AS BLACK. WELLE SEE HOW MUCH YOUR WORKPLACE LIKES THIS
were do you find all these law knowing people from kent bet she was bullied at school you have enough the report the fella the tried to move you camera did security move you ??
Are they stopping every car/lorry with a dashcam .
Rules and regulation in! And....a good worker intimidating members of the public, what has this country become
Well that Karen was an embarrassment wasnt she ??? She loved the sound of that awful voice of hers lol. THEN takes her phone out and does EXACTLY what she says you cant do by law ! ! Jesus wept . I hope she sees this
"You can't video someone for no reason" then videos the guy. Lol. Hopefully she learned a lesson.
Was it a Bonded site 🤔
Do you understand what I mean Bonded as in DFT site as in known fright ????
Find out who is the person in charge of that company and either send a copy or a link to the video, telling them your email address and your intention to inform the police, and your intention to prosecute the two people for their threatening behavior to yourself. Tell the manager by law the female has to provide you with a copy of the video/photos she took as that is a GDPR offense and also evidence in your case against the two individuals. Tell them the only way to prevent this action would be for them both to apologise to you personally on camera.
What a weird triumvirate of employees