Truth Is Consistent…Can You Spot The Replacements? Don't forget to like this video, comment, sub to my channel and follow me on Twitter @Darthh8r1988 #thebeatles #conspiracy #beatles
Great job Andrew! We often talk in the abstract about the changes in appearance and whether one or more was replaced. Seeing the individual Beatles over this timeline brings home just how much evidence there is. The use of doubles however further complicates things. Here’s my current thoughts: Paul was replaced but his replacement, Bill, was used earlier in the timeline. Effectively there were always two Pauls. John not replaced but possibly two people playing the role over the years. George - previously I would have thought that there was just one person. Your video has me thinking that earlier George was cruder featured and was replaced. Ringo - same guy all the way through with occasional use of doubles What’s your latest thinking? All replaced? Thanks for all your work - you are doing an amazing job - and not just on The Beatles!
All good thoughts Mark and I do plan to go live tonight to further get into it and discuss the video and also expose some other questionable channels but the one thing that you miss that I must always emphasize is the existence of MacCartney twin Mike and I mean the real one, not the imposter Mike McGear. Bill could be William Campbell or Bill could be Mike McCartney’s pseudonym.
@@TheSilentRevolution1988 John Halliday who was custodian of Paul's old family home. Meant to be his cousin. Has anyone ever researched to see if Paul had an uncle of aunt who had a boy of that name? Could have been born a few years apart.
John at about 1.50 sounds and seems to look different to before. At 1.50 he is speaking staccato, and is too full of himself and cock sure of himself - unlike before. At 2.18 he looks much older. Much. By about 4.00 a different bone structure to the face. The jaw angle between the photo in 66 and 67 very different.
I wonder why then that these replacements/actors felt the death of Paul so acutely?, Why would they be so miserable?, why would these actors be writing songs with Paul's death clues (check out George Harrison's 'Blow Away', 'While My Guitar Gently Weeps' amongst many others) If they are actors then why the huge disagreements with Billy?, surely they would just put on the smiles and get on with the job? I could show you 2 photo's of me barely 6 months apart and you would swear they were not the same person, slight difference in angle and a haircut. Massive weight loss, in John's case, can be completely transformative. Basing evidence on photo's that are half a century old and that we know in Paul's case have been altered anyway could be highly misleading. What cannot be replicated is overall personality, humour, wit and above all, spirit. A few hours trawling through videos will provide the answers.
0:06 to 4:05 - John Lennon
4:05 to 8:26 - Paul McCartney
8:26 to 11:23 - George Harrison
11:23 to 16:03 - Ringo Starr
Great job Andrew! We often talk in the abstract about the changes in appearance and whether one or more was replaced. Seeing the individual Beatles over this timeline brings home just how much evidence there is. The use of doubles however further complicates things. Here’s my current thoughts:
Paul was replaced but his replacement, Bill, was used earlier in the timeline. Effectively there were always two Pauls.
John not replaced but possibly two people playing the role over the years.
George - previously I would have thought that there was just one person. Your video has me thinking that earlier George was cruder featured and was replaced.
Ringo - same guy all the way through with occasional use of doubles
What’s your latest thinking? All replaced?
Thanks for all your work - you are doing an amazing job - and not just on The Beatles!
All good thoughts Mark and I do plan to go live tonight to further get into it and discuss the video and also expose some other questionable channels but the one thing that you miss that I must always emphasize is the existence of MacCartney twin Mike and I mean the real one, not the imposter Mike McGear. Bill could be William Campbell or Bill could be Mike McCartney’s pseudonym.
There was def more than one George. Though I think Ringo was switched in 67 if anything. Still so many questions lol
@@TheSilentRevolution1988 John Halliday who was custodian of Paul's old family home. Meant to be his cousin. Has anyone ever researched to see if Paul had an uncle of aunt who had a boy of that name? Could have been born a few years apart.
Great video! Thanks Andrew.
Glad you liked it! :)
Good stuff man 😅
I appreciate the new, Beatles content. Great work as usual!!
Much appreciated!
Paul. Ear placement between 66 side profile and 67 side profile.
Also the right eyebrow.
It’s here 🙌 Lfg haha..
George. Seems as if different faces throughout from the start. Interchangeable?
John at about 1.50 sounds and seems to look different to before. At 1.50 he is speaking staccato, and is too full of himself and cock sure of himself - unlike before.
At 2.18 he looks much older. Much.
By about 4.00 a different bone structure to the face. The jaw angle between the photo in 66 and 67 very different.
Ringo. Difficult to tell but looks the same fella to me.
Nobody knew then that John Lennon had quit the Bearles and was replaced by Colin Unwin.
Maybe maybe not. Could be smoke and mirrors
I heard it could have been in 1961-62 that John Lennon quit the Beatles before they became famous.
no doubles except paul stop this bs
nah, imma keep going
@@TheSilentRevolution1988 haha good luck
@@TheSilentRevolution1988 thank goodness!
Look at first few second of tell me Why video.. Each of them had 3 or 4 doubles. They were Tavistock project. Nothing strange about that.
@@TheSilentRevolution1988 anything 4 clicks hey ?
I wonder why then that these replacements/actors felt the death of Paul so acutely?, Why would they be so miserable?, why would these actors be writing songs with Paul's death clues (check out George Harrison's 'Blow Away', 'While My Guitar Gently Weeps' amongst many others) If they are actors then why the huge disagreements with Billy?, surely they would just put on the smiles and get on with the job?
I could show you 2 photo's of me barely 6 months apart and you would swear they were not the same person, slight difference in angle and a haircut.
Massive weight loss, in John's case, can be completely transformative.
Basing evidence on photo's that are half a century old and that we know in Paul's case have been altered anyway could be highly misleading.
What cannot be replicated is overall personality, humour, wit and above all, spirit.
A few hours trawling through videos will provide the answers.
It is all about doubles.. We all know they had at least 3 or 4 doubles for each of them.
Exactly, and Mike McGear isn’t Paul’s biological brother. I still think there’s McCartney twins, and each of them had doubles as well