Corrections 2: at 2:46 , dollar bills are unique, each has its own serial number and year it was made. Not all $1 bills can be exchanged equally because depending on when where and how a dollar bill is produced can significantly raise its value. So you need a better example.
is the correct number actually 777 billion? i doubt that. if you buy something for .1 ETH are they considering it a full ETH because they had to split it? i think you should ask some additional questions as these numbers seem like they came from a marketing team designed for clickbait. when you pay with your credit card, you pay the exact amount. you don't have to break an ETH.
@@skinnymatt64 That makes dollar bills worthless if $1 bills can be exchanged for more or less than $1 1ETH = 1ETH regardless of the dollar value value
@you wouldnt exchange a dollar bill for less than a dollar unless you had a screw lose , I was giving the example of rare currency, like rare coins for example but they will always atleast retain face value if not more, but never less , the value of 1 ETH has nothing to do with my comment, my main point is that every dollar bill is unique, when the video at the time stamp in my comment above said they were not
@@skinnymatt64 People exchange dollar bills for more or less than a dollar every single second. Forex traders, banks and even government bonds are examples of this...
I believe people need to get more into stocks and the foreign exchange market, I’ve seen and read how profitable some traders are, making millions, it’s incredible and astonishing, I know there’re no shorcuts, I wonder what are smart ways to go about it ?
It can also be very bad, I lost a lot trying it all by myself stock picking and selection and my portfolio on red, about nighteen months ago I got with A professional FA, I’ve now seen my $190k startup close to 2million in dividends. Without doubt professionalism is unmatched.
Mmm, should I spend 6,000 on a virtual plot of land to "build" a skyscraper, or should I spend 20 on minecraft and have infinite land Tough choice. I guess with the former I can scam others out of their money though
This video is an ad, Decenterland clearly paid the channel to do this. All these NFT's you see selling for millions of dollars aren't actually being "sold", 90% of it is just wash trading it from wallet A to wallet B so they can make a twitter post that "APE 8934 SOLD FOR 50 MILLION BUCKS" to try and trick the other 10% into unironically buying them. This video is the same. You say "People are buying virtual land for millions of dollars" so you can trick someone into thinking it's actually worth that price.
The video gives the example of Minecraft, which is ironic because in Minecraft you have basically infinite space, there's no need to make it scarce. Some servers implement a notion of property over items, but even then there's no cost to it, it's just to prevent grifting.
I agree with you, this kind of world is nonsense, they implemented limitation like scarcity in real world into the virtual world, with the motive to create some kind of "value" to profit something that can be transferred into real world money.
Unfortunately the digital land is selling for that much. Im invested heavily I'm mana and have made a butt fuck of money. You underestimate what dumb shit people with unlimited money are willing to pay for literally nothing.
@@jahbrenpanvilla people will just choose to play decentralized games where no one group controls it. every stake holder will vote. Verified fair voting via blockchain tech
@@ramenlover1727 TH-cam & the internet has taught the world more than all schools through history combined. Businesses using the internet have created so much value in various industries, including food production through supply trains built on the internet. Maybe game land won’t be real, but if that’s where people spend time getting educated and entertained then that’s where ads need to be. A TH-cam ad is more effective than a billboard in Texas because traffic from all the world can see an ad on TH-cam. Blockchain is going to change the word for better or worse. Be on the side helping it change for good. It’s bigger than games. Although games are a multibillion dollar industry and will use this tech in the future bc they’re really fun.
It will make more sense in the future. Right now it sounds like a scam. I used to play mmos and the value of land in high demand areas led people to buy and sell in real life, good plots for hundreds or even thousands of dollars. Developers might give real life discounts or services but only to people who visit their meta neighborhood and sign a guest book at jiffy lube guest house for $10 off in real life for example. It will make more sense as developers and marketers figure out how to make it worth our time to be in meta.
If I had a bunch of money and was bored id probably be buying and sitting on it then selling later. But as far as using it and participating in virtual crap, no thanks. Real life is keeping me plenty busy.
Every single virtual space that has ever been created was done so by putting money into it, therefore giving that virtual space a monetary value, when those companies found ways to profit they made it clear that virtual spaces can make money and this has been happening since the beginning of computing
is it that much more absurd than the multi-billion dollar business of cosmetic micro-transactions in video games? virtual clothing for virtual avatars in a virtual space
@wespozo it's not the scam as much as it is a bunch of betas and losers who live in a virtual world. They need to get the fook outside and get some fresh air, FFS.
@@don7117 LOL. I met people like you in VR. They had shrunk themselves down to the size of ants and followed me around calling me Chad. When you call people betas, you are projecting. You confuse PMS bitching males with being masculine.
just don’t get distracted. it’s just a video game. it’s not a good idea to think about this as anything more than that. especially if you have a family or are in college.
@@aloriium5957 Well, that's the crux of the issue, there, isn't it? "It's just a video game". A very very very expensive video game. But just like those pay-to-play apps, they don't make money off of the 1,000,000 free downloads, they make money off of kids who don't realize what in-app-purchases mean and people with addictions to their phone/game who end up squandering huge amounts of money. "Don't get distracted" is a very important thing to say...however, not to the people who are like 'wtf?', you need to be saying it to the players and purchasers in this game. It is absolutely a form of gambling...and the stakes come with very high prices.
Even if you understand. If you boil it down, it's exactly what you've said. The only thing that's makes it worth of investing, is believing that more and more people are joining the party and wanna play it.
@@kaanalpkozanl3914 well, not exactly. My previous answer could indicate this. But I would say it's has more in common with gambling or betting on the right horse. There are now more and more such 'metaverse platforms' ( I would call them games) showing up. And people might join the one where you invested your money in. But as soon as a new, more fancy one pops up people might not play in your 'metaverse' anymore and that is when prices will drop drastically. Or the metaverse ecosystem, you choose to invest might even never become as popular as you thought in the first place. Think of it like a computer game. Technology, graphics, game mechanics are changing and gamers/player's tend to get bored over time. There are maybe only a handful games that might still exists and have a well established playerbase that are older than 2-3 years. Remember second life, it was really hyped by it's time, but really quickly people lost interest. So right now I think at least half of the people just speculate with these things, NFTs etc. rather then playing these games.
A while ago, There was a website that sold pixels on it's page for real-world money. This feels like that to me, More than Second life. "The million dollar homepage" 'o.O
people are dropping millions on this specific metaverse version. but what happens when a newer and better one pops up and this is no longer as popular? do they just lose out on their money? how does this work
i was wondering the same. its still soo early to tell which company will end up dominating the metaverse. whats good is u will hopefully be able to visit the different metaverses. So im hoping youll be able to transfer ur assets to a diff metaverse as well.
Yeah when it's being used for 100% frivolous nonsense like most NFTs, it is irresponsible. When it's being used for dapps and smart contracts, and when Bitcoin is being used to safety transfer funds between strangers without using banks, consider the power consumption difference. How much power does a bank use just for their lights?
Yup, this is my biggest issue with Crypto. All of it is INSANELY irresponsible with it's energy consumption, because it is so dependent upon high-eng graphics cards being worked to their max, to mine it.
@@ItsJustMe0585 I totally agree, the world worked fine without it, we really didn't need to add a new problem to the list. If you look at something like planes, they are a big source of emissions that is going to be hard to tackle, but at least it has some utility. I imagine there is some utility with crypto, but it cannot be worth this price
@@miketyson6776 what will this do to solve the material contradictions of our current society that wouldn't be better solved with more mundane options we've had on hand for generations?
True, it would have been way nicer if they revolutionized the tourism so its easier for one to travel around the world in affordable ways. And without the hassle of visa and etc etc Rather than trying to trap people into staying home
Land only has value because it is a finite resource. in a meataverse all scarcity is artificially imposed. This just sounds like money laundering but with more steps
Not true. There’s thousands of acres of empty land all over the world no one cares about. But a square foot in downtown Manhattan or Oxford St, London can be worth tens of thousands. There are millions of websites but only one front page of Reddit. Attention can be worth it’s weight in gold to marketers.
@@QualicSelf those have near proximity. Virtual worlds have instant transport. The only value is in maybe naming, addressing, like how tlds are sold and traded. This already exists.
Diamonds are also artificially scarce-ified by the diamond industry and nobody bats an eye at that. Same can be said about most tangible things. The scarcity of some virtual items on the blockchain are almost more legitimate that that of tangible things.
@@forgotn42 Because the blockchain cannot be edited. Tangible items with scarcity such as gold can lose its value if an enormous deposit of it is struck tomorrow. I say almost more legitimate as the chances of the scarcity of something on the blockchain changing is so incomprehensibly, astronomically unlikely that it's a negligible risk, whereas the scarcity of a tangible good being altered, whether it be made more or less scared can be controlled by tons of factors. This is talking purely about scarcity, and on-chain assets. Value is subjective and I'm not gonna pretend like a plot of land in decentraland is just going to increase in value purely due to scarcity or whatever.
Problem is, black mirror takes neutral technologies that as with anything can be a tool of good and bad, and shines it in an absolute negative light. You could do that with anything. There could be a black mirror episode on phones, the internet, newspapers, or anything.
This sounds familiar. Their was a movie called left behind and they wanted everyone to put on these glasses to be hypnotized. This also happen on Sponge BoB when plankton wanted to take over he had everyone put on a Helmet so he may hypnotized them. This also happened in an anime called Naruto shippuden, where this giant tree attached itself to everyone in the world and trapped them in their own dreams filled with happiness forever. In the real world their bodies slowly turned to basically batteries, feeding the matrix. (Roots, feeding the tree) th-cam.com/video/JDM1CIwa5Bw/w-d-xo.html
We have one in 2029. Unfortunately the avatars aren't that great and it's not for public usage. By the way I'm from the future. California will experience a big earthquake by 2030.
@@JesusChristDenton_7 fuck off thats some scary shit cus i been thinkling about this aswell. and it aint no coincidende ready player one is based in 2027
yes it is possible even now but consumers don't have gpus that are powerful enough to run it. In 10 years time graphics cards will be a lot more powerful and more people will have access to them
I am glad to see all these people in the comment section seeing right through this BS... I didn't expect cheddar to make a video on such a hyped up baseless world supported by a bunch of Chads
The metaverse only works if everybody in real world has their finances in order (eg. living in their own house, has a car, food on the tables, bills paid, etc.) Otherwise, why would anybody spend tons of money in a virtual world if they have real life problems to deal with.
@@guillermodinanno8432 or we do understand it, and that's why we doubt it. a centralized trusted database authority is a far simpler and more secure method of metaversing safely and stably. Secondlife is still around and does digital currency just fine.
@@jeran42 I am not saying it's easy and simple.. It will take time to develop for sure, but the world is starting to shift into decentralization because there is a BIG problem on what you said.. "centralized trusted database authority"... There is no such thing as TRUSTED.. Money will flow into decentralization, giving the tools for a better, faster and simpler ecosystem being built in web 3.0
"As long as people use it the land will hold value." EXACTLY. WHILE REAL LAND WILL HOLD VALUE REGARDLESS. YOU KNOW... BECAUSE IT'S REAL. No matter how hard you try non-real things will never really have intrinsic value.
this, is 100% correct. things like crypto and NFTs can be decent enough way of doing things as long as they remain used and popular. but that is also what makes them risky as things can go out of style over night.
But plenty of land is near enough valueless. Plenty of places in the US where you can buy an area the size of Manhattan for the price of a Honda civic.
@@jackalenterprisesofohio middle of nowhere, huge chunks of the US are just empty. The point being land is only worth anything if it's useful. Or if someone convinces someone it has value, despite being useless. Check out California City, there's a bunch of TH-cam videos...
How about: it is real to those who are gonna be able to capitalize on it and make some real money? If Nigerian spam emails manage to fool people into parting with their money, then this seems like a potential that even Facebook is interested in capitalizing on.
In the very early 90's there were 'Nanohomes' available, a similar idea but bottleneck limited by dial-up speeds. I had one on a beachfront island location. You could design your own home and furnish it with your own art, have your own music playing, etc. I still have a Hotmail account from that era, but not the Nanohome. All of this and what is coming now is all based off of the seminal sci-fi book 'Snow Crash', by Neal Stephenson, published in '92. I thoroughly recommend it to anyone.
if there can be more than 1 metaverse, then the land that i buy in one may be may or may not be as valuable as another. if developers can keep creating more metaverse land, what insentive do i have to buy a specific one?
Just like stores going out of business, if you're not continually looking to expand your land then you're not providing the best service then you'll become obsolete.
This is where assets like personality and art come into play. It's just like a movie theater, big chains want you to come to their theatre so they make sure they have the latest releases. Small theaters with smaller budgets chase a different audience, like indie movies, and so on. You go to the theatre with the movies you like.
The point is for you to utilize the land and maximize its potential even if that means flipping and reselling the land. Your incentive to buy a specific one depends on your intention. If you can afford to rent or own digital property you’ll be researching anyways
I find this entire concept to be incredibly useless and wasteful. I also do not see this aging well. In terms of value retention, one might as well just set a stack of dollar bills on fire. At least the carbon emissions would be lower. We don’t need to create a fake virtual world to be perfect, we need to do the hard work of fixing the real one we’ve got
@@carlosroberson6659 I believe you believe this, but I for one am yet to be convinced. I don't have a dog in this fight, but I just can't wrap my head around it. That said, I didn't 'get' Twitter either until years after it launched.
We live now at the beginning of the cyberpunk era. It’s up to our actions, sweat, tears, and blood, whether this is original (dystopian) cyberpunk or post cyberpunk (non-dystopian).
This is faux scarcity based on hype. Take a wild guess whats going to happen to your investment... It also promotes a platform that forces IRL limits on what should be near infinite virtual worlds. These types of platforms need to be called out and not allowed to become the dominant gatekeepers of the metaverse.
Honestly? Furries have always been the true stewards of virtual reality even back in the 80's, and they *HATE* NFTs with a passion. I don't see this completely subsuming the internet as long as that's the case.
Take a step back and realize not all rare things are desired. Do you want to buy my used toilet? No? Then it's not "faux scarcity". It's demand... demand based on marketing, perceived value, etc...
You can't build a gaming experience or buy art or exchange money or take a course or even shop on a star.. in Decentraland.. you CAN..! let this sink in
@@mohammadomirah2611 2 years ago (edited) "You can't build a gaming experience or buy art or exchange money or take a course or even shop on a star.. in Decentraland.. you CAN..! let this sink in" Why would I choose Decentraland over Godot or Unreal for game development? Decentraland doesn't even support VR.
digital assets are nfts on a blockchain. For nfts to exist in a blockchain, that blockchain has to have smart contracts. So you could transfer digital assets with smart contracts that deposits them on other wallets instantly
Does cryptocurrency have no value because you can't touch it? Is ad space on a website that companies pay for worth nothing because it's not tangible? Everything is worth something to someone
@@Jellyblob Actual cryptocurrency like Bitcoin has value because it has utility as a method of payment for virtual transactions. Our technology as it is now is not capable of actually producing virtual land that has long-lasting utility. The example used in the video only has value because its users actually assign it a value. Once that value is gone, the virtual land itself becomes useless.
I recommend reading: - "Society of The Spectacle" by Guy Debord - "Simulacra and Simulation" by Jean Baudrillard Like, how is there so many people simply going with this nonsense? What is going on?
Most people aren't it seems, it's just that people who have a financial interest in everyone buying into it are doing their best to make it seem like everyone's all in on it. Don't be fooled, these people will fawn over anything NFT related because their investments in it needs them to.
It’s supposed to escape use from the actual world while they control it and do whatever they want lmfaooo distraction just invest make money off it cause it will happen
@@fallenlu9039 Bro, they will not be able to control things in the real world, because everyone and everything will be in the metaverse, politics, economy, everything, so if they would like to control the society, they’ll need to control us by the metaverse, real life is going to be your real scape
Gamers have finally managed to make money out of their hobby and making us all think it is the next step in evolution when is just a game of Farmville but way more expensive..well played gamers ,well played!
It's more than that. Someone in the multi verse might be buying your neighborhood without the real world knowing. You think you own your parents real estate in the meta verse? Think again. Someone else will. It's coming near you.
I agree, the hype in mainstream news lately is weird. Video games have essentially been creating metaverses for the past couple decades. With their own digital economy and currency. But all of a sudden people act as if it is a brand new and exciting concept.
Meanwhile the majority of people are hoping their money will pay the bills and buy some tangibles.....people are lucky to have money to buy land on the real planet let alone in some fake ass virtual reality!
This is just a fad. I don't think this is even what Facebook has in mind honestly. It's just second life but with NFTs. Who cares? The guy talks about not needing a regulatory office to build a skyscraper...yeah you also aren't building a skyscraper. I can visit a virtual skyscraper for free already.
Yes! Exactly! Mark's plan couldn't be this. It's about improving the quality of the internet. Turning internet into MetaverseWhere you could have serious meeting, like business deals in person, but virtual. You can do your transactions virtualy in person, BUT with legal saftly.
@@alanvictor3156 I wouldn't totally agree. I think they plan to have a combination of a VR WeWork and the all-in-one gaming sphere that Microsoft attempted with Xbox, PC, and Zune/Windows Phone, which all could access Xbox Live, and eventually continuity developed across them, though Zune and the phone died.
@@h.c4898 I understand what an NFT is. But since it holds no value other than speculation, it makes no sense to be interested in this fake real estate.
@@Mutantcy1992 Imagine a new platform (DAO) comes up with the idea of surveying the entire planet, soon you'll be able to purchase digital lands based on real life surveys. What if you decide to buy your entire neighborhood where your house is, the entire estate now belongs to you digitally. If your neighbors find out about it don't you think it'll spark some mind buggling curiosity? I think it will. Let's say Elon musk (Tesla) decides to buy Epstein's island on that platform, In real life it belongs to the Epstein Estate but digitally it belongs to Musk. One day they might ask Musk to sell it back to them for a billion$ I'm just speculating at this point.
I keep an open mind to new concepts. It makes sense and all but what happens when people lose interest? They move onto the next best video game and you can't sell your digital assets for half of what you paid? Then your equity plummets. Although this can happen in the real world, it's hard to argue that REAL land will exist whether we use it or not, and has real intrinsic value while these digital assets can disappear and seem to be based purely on people's emotions, and emotions like the wind change direction!
Hell, the use of real estate as a speculative investment is the root cause of a *lot* of problems right now, why would tou *ever* want to replicate that online to begin with?
A standard for such ethereal real-estate exists, internet domain names. This just looks like a breaking down of one standard into several competing standards to me.
Agreed. One would say that you are stating the obvious, but there are gonna be those who are gullible or immature enough (mostly youngsters?) who are gonna part with their money for this, and someone is gonna profit. I too wonder how long this "fad" will last, but even Facebook is interested to try to capitalize on this.
Same thing happened 150yrs ago when folks would buy up land where the railroad was *supposed* to go, hoping to build or sell when the land shot up in value. Which worked... except when the railroad went elsewhere, leaving them with a plot of worthless land in the middle of nowhere. This is why it's important to learn history - the tech changes, but human psychology stays the same.
I don’t think people see the future to well. These lockdowns are not going to end. They will be called climate lockdowns, traveling will be limited to the elite private planes, ships etc. even cars will be owned by corporations. You will own nothing and be happy. You want to go some where call an autonomous ev, if you have not over spent your personal carbon credit. 2030!
I remember running around in second life a long time ago. And whilst it was lovely for a few nights, i didn't get why i should stick around longer. It's like staring through the glass of a high end up shop, knowing you cannot afford, so why bother staring at all? And the best part of this video is that you haven't explained why i should visit these metaverses. Nobody seems to be able to tell me why i should...
I had the same experience with second life and also don't understand what should be any better in a metaverse or why "fake online identities of a better version of the people" should be something I want to see more of. I mean we already have instagram ... :-D
Isn't the appeal something similar to why you would join Facebook for the first time? You do it because everyone else is on there. So they have to build a critical mass of users and create a network effect to bring other people on board until even the most casual people are joining just because.
Because there is no reason. Nothing in the metaverse puts food on your table or gas/electricity in your car. Virtual shoes won't protect your actual feet. A virtual gym won't actually get you healthy. Some might argue it's no different than paying for stuff in a game and they might be right in some sense but the fun of a game is the game. If you don't have that, why bother? I'd rather save my money and take an actual trip to see the Eiffel Tower than pay to stare at a bunch of pixels pretending to be the Eiffel Tower.
Unless we solve the climate change problems, this digital land will be useless bogus, great video as usual though, glad that you always include pros and cons
In finance, the greater fool theory suggests that one can sometimes make money through the purchase of overvalued assets - items with a purchase price drastically exceeding the intrinsic value - if those assets can later be resold at an even higher price. In this context, one "fool" might pay for an overpriced asset, hoping that he can sell it to an even "greater fool" and make a profit. This only works as long as there are new "greater fools" willing to pay higher and higher prices for the asset. Eventually, investors can no longer deny that the price is out of touch with reality, at which point a sell-off can cause the price to drop significantly until it is closer to its fair value, which in some cases could be zero.
Exactly what financial, environmental, or social benefit is this supposed to have? Not even the most ardent supporters seem to be able to explain why we should want any of this in the first place
@Allan Copeland You didn't even attempt to answer my question. You think it's a good idea? Fine. Then you should be able to articulate the benefits or purpose this could serve. If you aren't able to, then YOU are the one who doesn't actually understand what they're doing
@@ZERO-rz2go No one owns it, this platform is only the first one and int he future many more are gonna come the exact same way so the facade of "you own it" is false since someone else can get th same property on another meta verse and even worse what do you think it's gonna happen when this platform they display here is no longer famous which is about to happen and all people hop into another more famous one? You're gonna be stuck with a virtual asset you cant even touch or hold.
this feels more like an advertisement for dumb crypto scams than any an interesting story. Not enough focus was put on the dangers of this unregulated speculative hellscape.
@@travelblade2k ok.. let me expand your mind.. electricity didn't exist 150 years go... then, transistor tech didn't exist until 1953, now we are making phones with a million times the power of a computer from 1980 which in 1960 would take up an entire warehouse.... then, add in say... about 100,000 years of development... and.. you sir, could quite well be in a simulation and not even know it
It seems to me that the natural world is the greatest source of excitement; the greatest source of visual beauty; the greatest source of intellectual interest. It is the greatest source of so much in life that makes life worth living. David Attenborough
"This world is gonna face real world scrutiny. That is, ensure that it stays in the hands of the people". Yeah, because the real world did such an amazing job of doing exactly that 7n7
Oh my, I can just imagine some US congressional committee questioning Mark Zuckerberg about scamming their metaverse users out of their money. My German is not the best but I believe "zucker" means sugar, and "berg" means mountain. So he's got a mountain of sugar to "sell" you, or he is hoping for a mountain of "zuckers". I'm just trying to be facetious, this is all pretty sad to me.
It's all about extrinsic value. People create random and useless stuff and make money with it. It's the business model of the art world applied to virtual reality.
Also the same business model of wall street. At this point investors are just looking for excuses to sell nothing for millions. Stocks: intangible slices of companies that aren't actually valued based on the company., Futures: intangible slices of things in the future which may or may not exist eventually. Crypto: Literally intangible pieces of nothing.
Scam. It’s all a scam. Even with crypto. The government will eventually get its hands on it, whether directly or indirectly by monitoring every transaction
because you can buy a land, set up a business, create revenue, art gallery, host a meeting, build a community and increase the land of the value without the interference from any centralized entity? Literally endless possibilities because of blockchain technologies. If you think this is just a game with shitty graphics, with people spending money on 'jpegs' or 'fake houses' then you really wont get it..
for somebody who doesn’t even like to play video games, this all looks like a more immersive version of a video game in which i still have no interest. i don’t see how investing real money into virtual property and what not would make my life richer and happier. but hey, for all i care, i hope this just means that physical real estate will get cheaper and that i’ll be able to buy another property. or that people will be motivated to stay home so i can peacefully enjoy national parks and nature. i guess i like myself too much to be able to give my real life privileges for virtual reality property and wearables 😳
it wont, this is just people looking to profit other ways than the traditional systems. it is ripe for manipulation and in the end it will be used for money laundering and ponzi schemes and the developers of these world have no real reason to stop them either
Digital images, videos and audios are not mend to be non-fungible. The entire idea behind these types of files is to make things fundamentally shareable and copyable - theoretically infinitely and lossless. Digital files have no original. If I make a GIF and send you a copy of it, we both own the original. Because that "original" is just a signal, an instruction for computers. NFTs have the potential to make things better. But buying "original files" is an economic idolatry that could end in a huge disaster; and I'm not willing to repair the damage of some idiotic yuppies.
How does limiting the ability to enjoy digital art an improvement? Physical art is limited because of its tangibliliy. No such limitation exists for digital art. This is an advantage not a disadvantage
Well said! I was thinking this the whole video.. the digital world is designed to be copyable and lossless.. it doesn't have the limitations of the physical world. So why are we opposing arbitrary limitations.. so dumb. Also you can't live, eat food, survive in these digital worlds. It's a Video GAME. Such an entitled use of resources (money)..
land is even stupider, ah yes there is a limited number of land on this server so let me spend a million on it, all of a sudden the server admins greed makes him ad more land, open a second server etc. also why would a non bussniess ever buy a small amout of land? in the real world it can be expencive to create/buy new land , you might need to commute to work, they might have better social services. There are no commute times, no essential social services which are region spesific, or large cost to buying or selling land. These are pozi schemes ran buy private people and companies.
Difference now is the technology is more advanced and will only get better. Dont be ignorant in thinkinking this won't be everyday life in the next 10 years
@@ricovee9715 My comment was about people adapting earthly concepts in a controlled digital metaverse. Buying digital land is useless because it's owned by 1 person, when soon there will be millions of creators coding their own worlds way more valuable than pots of land for sale that's modeled from earth
@UCxZVj8iS_bXjEoHH-2M38NA I really don't know. I'm just throwing out buzz words people use . I understand what you were saying . I was more so trolling the people who would disagree with you and argue that u don't understand block chain and blah blah blah
How are they gonna say it's built by the users for the user? Did they ignore the sixers in ready player one! Your telling me the elites of the world aren't gonna find a way to take over the metaverse!
All of this, is just unregulated securtization for assets you don't want the government to know about. It holds value like art does, as long as someone is willing to pay you more for it then what you bought it for. REAL estate in IRL is highly regulated by city,state,and federal laws, and it's taxed as so. I wouldn't be surprised if the SEC comes down and slams Decentraland and others as Securities thus forcing them to be subject to regulation. When that happens the partys over, value will plunge as everyone will try to sell at the same time to avoid the IRS, or be banned from Decentraland all together.
That's exactly what the crypto space is about. Centraland Meta verse is no different. Has the gov made any progress in banning crypto since 2008 at the rise of Bitcoin? Zero. This thing is gonna go forward I'm telling you with the gov or without its participation. Govs and financial institutions made enough damages to the value of its legal tender for years, screwing up its own constituents nobody said nothing. The blockchain will achieve that. 😄 It's not here to be gov and oligarch friendly I'm telling you.
Land in the physical world is limited hence it should hold a certain value. But anybody can create empty land on the internet which makes land in the virtual world actually abundant. How can anything hold value if it is abundant. Plus even if we own land on the internet on any of the websites, what would happen if these websites suddenly cease to exist? Concept of the virtual land seems seriously flawed but I can see the future of metaverse, it feels absurd at first but is somewhat reasonable and feasible given the situation and technology today.
Great points Unnat Sadh! There's still a lot to be developed and worked out, and the risk of an abundance of metaverses / lack of scarcity of virtual land is definitely a concern.
This is insane, seems like a form of gambling through aspiration marketing, how is the real cash profit made in these virtual worlds? Other then the goggles. (Is it mainly monthly online membership fees, do real companies buy advertising space, are people paying real dollars for 'virtual' goods or what?)
Because of the blockchain technology you're able to monetize in this universe. It's decentralized. It's not lik in-app purchases you can do in your regular mobile games. It's money circulating in the blockchain between nodes, no governments or financial institutions dictating the markets or causing inflations. It's pretty exciting. It creeps govs and banks out.
Imagine that you buy your neighborhood in the meta verse. You own your neighbors' real estates in the meta verse. If they get tech savvy enough down the road and enter the same meta verse as you they will see their virtual lands doesn't belong to them but to you. They might ask you to purchase it back to them. You can now bargain. It's like opening a website you need to purchase a domain name. Domain names are virtual address it's non tangble however you need it to open a website. It's basically the same principle that applies.
Such a crazy world. Everyone should watch until the end to see the issues that all of this brings up. Glad cheddar is taking a middle ground stance on this.
I think they didnt hit hard enough on a potential issue, what if ppl like with they would with any video game stop carring about this world and new ppl would stop coming in? This would be the end of everyones investment. Wouldnt it?
I honestly am ashamed they gave this good will in the beginning even if they are taking the middle ground approach, this is a shitcoin scam or whatever else you wanna call it. Too many people are jumping in on this bubble already and its just disgraceful reporting on their part to just make it seem so cool and flashy from what they say first instead of just saying it how it is.
Why are you letting this guy just promote his shitcoin by saying 'you can buy things and it can go up' without challanging or mentioning that it can also go down and just become worthless, if people stop being interested in digital items without any material benefit in the real world? The only time this a aluded to at all is in an half sentence at 5:15 -.-
Metaverse is really a done deal, now that it has been merged with NFTs and crypto tokens the possibilities are endless. In the field of fitness and gaming StepApp Metaverse and it ecosystem has created a platform where users exercise to earn $Fitfi tokens. Its SDK protocols also gives opportunity to developers to create their own content.
1:35 funny, because as soon as there is money to be made, the big corporations will jump in and buy everything. Personally I don't like were it's all headed. Games used to be just for fun, now they are slowly evolving into another job where you have to go into lifetime of debt just to be a part of it.
Ehh until the tech gets way better to the point where the experience is immersive and mostly frictionless (like RPO) I don't really see this being anything more than upgraded 2nd life. Like why the hell would you log on to this and walk around a virtual mall. It's just a super annoying crappy version of Amazon. Let's circle back to this in 2040 and we'll see then.
@@kamX-rz4uy He is far far better at it than this garbage then. Plus we are actually built in to this universe rather than just pretending to be from it.
@@octopusgoodness1909 We built our world like we will built the meta verse how much of your life is truly "natural"? The forest you like to walk in, is probably planted by Humans. The park you like is definitely created by humans. And the reason why you can step out your door and not get eaten by a animal is because we hunt everything down that is dangerous to us. We are Creator and Child of our own environment. True Natur is a not caring beautiful war were ever body tries to get more time by doing there thing because time is the only limiting factor in life. Have a great day 👍🏻
Correction: At 0:40, it is stated that the Ethereum blockchain settled $2.5tr of transactions in Q2 of 2021. The correct number is $777.1bn
Corrections 2: at 2:46 , dollar bills are unique, each has its own serial number and year it was made. Not all $1 bills can be exchanged equally because depending on when where and how a dollar bill is produced can significantly raise its value. So you need a better example.
is the correct number actually 777 billion? i doubt that. if you buy something for .1 ETH are they considering it a full ETH because they had to split it? i think you should ask some additional questions as these numbers seem like they came from a marketing team designed for clickbait. when you pay with your credit card, you pay the exact amount. you don't have to break an ETH.
@@skinnymatt64 That makes dollar bills worthless if $1 bills can be exchanged for more or less than $1
1ETH = 1ETH regardless of the dollar value value
@you wouldnt exchange a dollar bill for less than a dollar unless you had a screw lose , I was giving the example of rare currency, like rare coins for example but they will always atleast retain face value if not more, but never less , the value of 1 ETH has nothing to do with my comment, my main point is that every dollar bill is unique, when the video at the time stamp in my comment above said they were not
@@skinnymatt64 People exchange dollar bills for more or less than a dollar every single second. Forex traders, banks and even government bonds are examples of this...
I believe people need to get more into stocks and the foreign exchange market, I’ve seen and read how profitable some traders are, making millions, it’s incredible and astonishing, I know there’re no shorcuts, I wonder what are smart ways to go about it ?
Real facts, the fin market might be broad and complicated, but if you do know what you’re doing,mit can also be very rewarding,.
It can also be very bad, I lost a lot trying it all by myself stock picking and selection and my portfolio on red, about nighteen months ago I got with A professional FA, I’ve now seen my $190k startup close to 2million in dividends. Without doubt professionalism is unmatched.
That’s a good amount for that time frame, can you say on who your adviser if you don’t mind.
I’d only say get with, just do your due diligence on Rebecca Noblett Roberts, She’s top notch.
I just checked her out and I have sent her an email. I hope she gets back to me soon
"You can make anything there, no need to go through all the city planning."
YEA, BECAUSE IT'S NOT REAL. REAL BUILDINGS HAVE AN ACTUAL USE.
you sound like a boomer.
@@CryptoDad83 you sound like an atheist
Learn about Anubis today.
Lol he's a boomer
@@aeonubis6488 maybe he knows about history. Like the famous Ponzi?
Mmm, should I spend 6,000 on a virtual plot of land to "build" a skyscraper, or should I spend 20 on minecraft and have infinite land
Tough choice.
I guess with the former I can scam others out of their money though
This is so ridiculous. Why create virtual scarcity? You can have infinite everything, so why would you ever impose limits on that!?
This video is an ad, Decenterland clearly paid the channel to do this. All these NFT's you see selling for millions of dollars aren't actually being "sold", 90% of it is just wash trading it from wallet A to wallet B so they can make a twitter post that "APE 8934 SOLD FOR 50 MILLION BUCKS" to try and trick the other 10% into unironically buying them.
This video is the same. You say "People are buying virtual land for millions of dollars" so you can trick someone into thinking it's actually worth that price.
The video gives the example of Minecraft, which is ironic because in Minecraft you have basically infinite space, there's no need to make it scarce. Some servers implement a notion of property over items, but even then there's no cost to it, it's just to prevent grifting.
I agree with you, this kind of world is nonsense, they implemented limitation like scarcity in real world into the virtual world, with the motive to create some kind of "value" to profit something that can be transferred into real world money.
Unfortunately the digital land is selling for that much. Im invested heavily I'm mana and have made a butt fuck of money. You underestimate what dumb shit people with unlimited money are willing to pay for literally nothing.
Just imagine how much money regular idiots spend on cosmetics in video games. My gf has dead ass bought thousands of dollars in skins.
So it’s like sim city if EA had figured out how to squeeze the most money out of their players, sounds awesome…
You mean the sims, watch EA turn the the sims into a metaverse.
@@jahbrenpanvilla that’s what I was thinking too. But sim city is a real thing, it came out before sims.
What makes you think the 100 dollar bill worth money? Bitcoin worth 50k? We make it worth that money cause we think it’s worth it.
@@jahbrenpanvilla people will just choose to play decentralized games where no one group controls it. every stake holder will vote. Verified fair voting via blockchain tech
@@ramenlover1727 TH-cam & the internet has taught the world more than all schools through history combined. Businesses using the internet have created so much value in various industries, including food production through supply trains built on the internet.
Maybe game land won’t be real, but if that’s where people spend time getting educated and entertained then that’s where ads need to be. A TH-cam ad is more effective than a billboard in Texas because traffic from all the world can see an ad on TH-cam.
Blockchain is going to change the word for better or worse. Be on the side helping it change for good. It’s bigger than games. Although games are a multibillion dollar industry and will use this tech in the future bc they’re really fun.
It’s not bad enough that real life is getting too expensive….now imaginary life is even more expensive😂
nah I guess real life would become less expensive and virtual is more, Which is good lol
What is this madness, only mad men used to live in a world of their own
ha ha ha, imaginary life becoming expensive tooo,lol brah! I feel you.
Get with the times or get left behind.
#saythatagainplease 💪🏾👍🏽
Really quite absurd. I can't think of anything more bizarre than putting monetary value on virtual space.
It will make more sense in the future. Right now it sounds like a scam. I used to play mmos and the value of land in high demand areas led people to buy and sell in real life, good plots for hundreds or even thousands of dollars. Developers might give real life discounts or services but only to people who visit their meta neighborhood and sign a guest book at jiffy lube guest house for $10 off in real life for example. It will make more sense as developers and marketers figure out how to make it worth our time to be in meta.
If I had a bunch of money and was bored id probably be buying and sitting on it then selling later. But as far as using it and participating in virtual crap, no thanks. Real life is keeping me plenty busy.
Every single virtual space that has ever been created was done so by putting money into it, therefore giving that virtual space a monetary value, when those companies found ways to profit they made it clear that virtual spaces can make money and this has been happening since the beginning of computing
is it that much more absurd than the multi-billion dollar business of cosmetic micro-transactions in video games? virtual clothing for virtual avatars in a virtual space
+ millions of dollars worth of "dance animations" have been sold for characters on fortnite
Another great example of the absolute decline of our society.
@wespozo it's not the scam as much as it is a bunch of betas and losers who live in a virtual world. They need to get the fook outside and get some fresh air, FFS.
@@don7117 LOL. I met people like you in VR. They had shrunk themselves down to the size of ants and followed me around calling me Chad.
When you call people betas, you are projecting. You confuse PMS bitching males with being masculine.
Digital life? While the rich live in the real world?
Ohh now I see where this is heading 🙂.
New world order no?
just don’t get distracted. it’s just a video game. it’s not a good idea to think about this as anything more than that. especially if you have a family or are in college.
Boom.
@@aloriium5957 Well, that's the crux of the issue, there, isn't it? "It's just a video game". A very very very expensive video game. But just like those pay-to-play apps, they don't make money off of the 1,000,000 free downloads, they make money off of kids who don't realize what in-app-purchases mean and people with addictions to their phone/game who end up squandering huge amounts of money. "Don't get distracted" is a very important thing to say...however, not to the people who are like 'wtf?', you need to be saying it to the players and purchasers in this game. It is absolutely a form of gambling...and the stakes come with very high prices.
Exactly
To someone like me who doesn't really understand how all this works it's just like a very very VERY expensive computer game
Exactly what I was thinking.
Even if you understand. If you boil it down, it's exactly what you've said.
The only thing that's makes it worth of investing, is believing that more and more people are joining the party and wanna play it.
Yes. But one that will trap your mind and you will have no choice but to play.
@@funkypocorn So it is like a pyramid scheme?
@@kaanalpkozanl3914 well, not exactly. My previous answer could indicate this. But I would say it's has more in common with gambling or betting on the right horse. There are now more and more such 'metaverse platforms' ( I would call them games) showing up. And people might join the one where you invested your money in. But as soon as a new, more fancy one pops up people might not play in your 'metaverse' anymore and that is when prices will drop drastically.
Or the metaverse ecosystem, you choose to invest might even never become as popular as you thought in the first place.
Think of it like a computer game. Technology, graphics, game mechanics are changing and gamers/player's tend to get bored over time.
There are maybe only a handful games that might still exists and have a well established playerbase that are older than 2-3 years.
Remember second life, it was really hyped by it's time, but really quickly people lost interest.
So right now I think at least half of the people just speculate with these things, NFTs etc. rather then playing these games.
I love the way everyone acts like this is some amazing new thing. It's just Second Life. Real money was used in that as well.
It's weird how no one is talking about Second Life when covering these. It's literally done this all before and is still doing it
A while ago, There was a website that sold pixels on it's page for real-world money.
This feels like that to me, More than Second life.
"The million dollar homepage" 'o.O
yeah or habbo hotel
@@Magpie_Media Why is that more? People spent real world money in Second Life too.
That's what baffles me too. LOL
And Decentraland is a lot like Second Life was 10-15 years ago.
people are dropping millions on this specific metaverse version. but what happens when a newer and better one pops up and this is no longer as popular? do they just lose out on their money? how does this work
exactly wondering the same
What happens when an Elder Scrolls or Dark Souls game comes out? Does Zelda become irrelevant?
@@fishbrainCTRL never played any of those
i was wondering the same. its still soo early to tell which company will end up dominating the metaverse. whats good is u will hopefully be able to visit the different metaverses. So im hoping youll be able to transfer ur assets to a diff metaverse as well.
Think of it like the internet as metaverse, with every domain in the interner as the virtual world that take place.
7:10 hang on, hold up a minute. One transaction uses the same electricity as an average US household over 5 days? That is beyond irresponsible
That’s f***ing ridiculous
Yeah when it's being used for 100% frivolous nonsense like most NFTs, it is irresponsible. When it's being used for dapps and smart contracts, and when Bitcoin is being used to safety transfer funds between strangers without using banks, consider the power consumption difference. How much power does a bank use just for their lights?
@@Hoes_Mad okay how much power does it take to make a single transaction by wiring money through the bank?
Yup, this is my biggest issue with Crypto. All of it is INSANELY irresponsible with it's energy consumption, because it is so dependent upon high-eng graphics cards being worked to their max, to mine it.
@@ItsJustMe0585 I totally agree, the world worked fine without it, we really didn't need to add a new problem to the list. If you look at something like planes, they are a big source of emissions that is going to be hard to tackle, but at least it has some utility. I imagine there is some utility with crypto, but it cannot be worth this price
Such a scam, and people are falling for this shit. What a world.
inb4 someone with the ugliest avatar you've ever seen insists you're wrong without elaborating how in any way.
Not a scam u can do anything in a meta verse this will help alot the humanity
@@miketyson6776 what will this do to solve the material contradictions of our current society that wouldn't be better solved with more mundane options we've had on hand for generations?
@@miketyson6776 wtf r u on abt man
@@miketyson6776 its making things worse idk why ud think this will solve anything in the world
It's just a stinky lie. Let's improve our real life instead of building stone online absurd stuff that doesn't help anyone.
True, it would have been way nicer if they revolutionized the tourism so its easier for one to travel around the world in affordable ways. And without the hassle of visa and etc etc Rather than trying to trap people into staying home
Not after they could manipulate your brain impulse to hack your senses. You won't even realize what reality you live in.
@@robinpratama8897 so true! You got it!
@@robinpratama8897 it's called lunatic asylum
True but it has already started
Land only has value because it is a finite resource. in a meataverse all scarcity is artificially imposed. This just sounds like money laundering but with more steps
Not true. There’s thousands of acres of empty land all over the world no one cares about. But a square foot in downtown Manhattan or Oxford St, London can be worth tens of thousands. There are millions of websites but only one front page of Reddit. Attention can be worth it’s weight in gold to marketers.
@@QualicSelf those have near proximity. Virtual worlds have instant transport. The only value is in maybe naming, addressing, like how tlds are sold and traded. This already exists.
Diamonds are also artificially scarce-ified by the diamond industry and nobody bats an eye at that. Same can be said about most tangible things. The scarcity of some virtual items on the blockchain are almost more legitimate that that of tangible things.
@@Jellyblob No, they aren't more legitimate. You just have more faith in the blockchain system.
@@forgotn42 Because the blockchain cannot be edited. Tangible items with scarcity such as gold can lose its value if an enormous deposit of it is struck tomorrow. I say almost more legitimate as the chances of the scarcity of something on the blockchain changing is so incomprehensibly, astronomically unlikely that it's a negligible risk, whereas the scarcity of a tangible good being altered, whether it be made more or less scared can be controlled by tons of factors. This is talking purely about scarcity, and on-chain assets.
Value is subjective and I'm not gonna pretend like a plot of land in decentraland is just going to increase in value purely due to scarcity or whatever.
Black Mirror is the most unimaginative show. It's literally our future!
Yes this are all possible parallel universes in future in BM. :)
Problem is, black mirror takes neutral technologies that as with anything can be a tool of good and bad, and shines it in an absolute negative light. You could do that with anything. There could be a black mirror episode on phones, the internet, newspapers, or anything.
Never seen it
what episodes should i watch?
@@nonamenolast3034 all episodes ... rly
This sounds familiar. Their was a movie called left behind and they wanted everyone to put on these glasses to be hypnotized. This also happen on Sponge BoB when plankton wanted to take over he had everyone put on a Helmet so he may hypnotized them.
This also happened in an anime called Naruto shippuden, where this giant tree attached itself to everyone in the world and trapped them in their own dreams filled with happiness forever. In the real world their bodies slowly turned to basically batteries, feeding the matrix. (Roots, feeding the tree)
th-cam.com/video/JDM1CIwa5Bw/w-d-xo.html
So, it's Second Life but with far worse climate impact?
Is it possible to have a meta verse that doesn’t look like ps2 graphics?
It’ll take time. You thought you living in 2040 or what
We have one in 2029. Unfortunately the avatars aren't that great and it's not for public usage. By the way I'm from the future. California will experience a big earthquake by 2030.
@@JesusChristDenton_7 fuck off thats some scary shit cus i been thinkling about this aswell. and it aint no coincidende ready player one is based in 2027
@@JesusChristDenton_7 can you give me the next 5 super bowl winners?
yes it is possible even now but consumers don't have gpus that are powerful enough to run it. In 10 years time graphics cards will be a lot more powerful and more people will have access to them
Gosh what’s going to happen to all those addicted vrheads when the power gets shut off because you used all of your carbon credits.
I am glad to see all these people in the comment section seeing right through this BS... I didn't expect cheddar to make a video on such a hyped up baseless world supported by a bunch of Chads
The metaverse only works if everybody in real world has their finances in order (eg. living in their own house, has a car, food on the tables, bills paid, etc.) Otherwise, why would anybody spend tons of money in a virtual world if they have real life problems to deal with.
To escape from this hell hole…only to go into another one
people literally pay for virtual fun whenever they buy a game system
Cuz they are getting rental from there land !!!!
Are you trolling ?
I think that’s where it’s heading tbh. Go to school and work all in VR.
Every 20 years or so we’ll reinvent second life and expect it to change the world.
The Sims 5
or VR chat
You don't seem to understand the Cryptocurrency technology if you think that way
@@guillermodinanno8432 or we do understand it, and that's why we doubt it. a centralized trusted database authority is a far simpler and more secure method of metaversing safely and stably. Secondlife is still around and does digital currency just fine.
@@jeran42 I am not saying it's easy and simple.. It will take time to develop for sure, but the world is starting to shift into decentralization because there is a BIG problem on what you said.. "centralized trusted database authority"... There is no such thing as TRUSTED.. Money will flow into decentralization, giving the tools for a better, faster and simpler ecosystem being built in web 3.0
"As long as people use it the land will hold value."
EXACTLY. WHILE REAL LAND WILL HOLD VALUE REGARDLESS. YOU KNOW... BECAUSE IT'S REAL.
No matter how hard you try non-real things will never really have intrinsic value.
this, is 100% correct. things like crypto and NFTs can be decent enough way of doing things as long as they remain used and popular. but that is also what makes them risky as things can go out of style over night.
But plenty of land is near enough valueless. Plenty of places in the US where you can buy an area the size of Manhattan for the price of a Honda civic.
@@mageyeah7763 wait where and on a totally not related question how much is a honda civic?
@@jackalenterprisesofohio middle of nowhere, huge chunks of the US are just empty. The point being land is only worth anything if it's useful. Or if someone convinces someone it has value, despite being useless. Check out California City, there's a bunch of TH-cam videos...
@@mageyeah7763 Yes but it won't get any cheaper over time. It's stable. If anything it will go up if it's farmable.
1. Hate government intervention
2. Create unregulated cyberspace
3. Bad actors hurting people
4. Ask for government intervention
5. ???
6. Profit
I hate this timeline.
😂😂😂
Me to
i hate the past either, each to their own.
It's defintely a strange one. It does have some equally bizzare upsides.
Real estate in virtual setting?!
More like fake estate
False estate has a better sound to it. ;)
How about: it is real to those who are gonna be able to capitalize on it and make some real money? If Nigerian spam emails manage to fool people into parting with their money, then this seems like a potential that even Facebook is interested in capitalizing on.
@@monocharismatic well said. the future belongs to those who can imagine it.
In the very early 90's there were 'Nanohomes' available, a similar idea but bottleneck limited by dial-up speeds. I had one on a beachfront island location. You could design your own home and furnish it with your own art, have your own music playing, etc. I still have a Hotmail account from that era, but not the Nanohome. All of this and what is coming now is all based off of the seminal sci-fi book 'Snow Crash', by Neal Stephenson, published in '92. I thoroughly recommend it to anyone.
I’ve read Snow Crash, and I’d say you’ve hit the nail on the head!
If ever there were something to make me belive in simulation theory, this would be it.
The technological singularity is almost here
Yes.
I do exist, am glad its becoming more apparent.😊
if there can be more than 1 metaverse, then the land that i buy in one may be may or may not be as valuable as another. if developers can keep creating more metaverse land, what insentive do i have to buy a specific one?
Just like stores going out of business, if you're not continually looking to expand your land then you're not providing the best service then you'll become obsolete.
This is where assets like personality and art come into play. It's just like a movie theater, big chains want you to come to their theatre so they make sure they have the latest releases. Small theaters with smaller budgets chase a different audience, like indie movies, and so on.
You go to the theatre with the movies you like.
There shouldn't be one,creativity and having fun should be the main use
The point is for you to utilize the land and maximize its potential even if that means flipping and reselling the land. Your incentive to buy a specific one depends on your intention. If you can afford to rent or own digital property you’ll be researching anyways
If developers can keep coding an infinite amount of chat apps? What incentive do I have to leave WhatsApp?
It looks for me like an ultra capitalistic minecraft server:/
yep
Referencing Ready Player One as a utopian metaverse when the movie is intensely dystopian is 🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩
I find this entire concept to be incredibly useless and wasteful. I also do not see this aging well. In terms of value retention, one might as well just set a stack of dollar bills on fire. At least the carbon emissions would be lower.
We don’t need to create a fake virtual world to be perfect, we need to do the hard work of fixing the real one we’ve got
Your comment won’t age well. It sounds like the old comments when the “world wide web” was introduced.
Well said.
@@carlosroberson6659 I believe you believe this, but I for one am yet to be convinced. I don't have a dog in this fight, but I just can't wrap my head around it. That said, I didn't 'get' Twitter either until years after it launched.
lol Thats a good idea but that aint happening
It could be fun if it was a space to create things and not one to speculate with things.
We live now at the beginning of the cyberpunk era. It’s up to our actions, sweat, tears, and blood, whether this is original (dystopian) cyberpunk or post cyberpunk (non-dystopian).
This is faux scarcity based on hype. Take a wild guess whats going to happen to your investment... It also promotes a platform that forces IRL limits on what should be near infinite virtual worlds. These types of platforms need to be called out and not allowed to become the dominant gatekeepers of the metaverse.
Or let them devalue while normal people move onto better projects lol
Or, more accurately hype based on faux scarcity.
Honestly? Furries have always been the true stewards of virtual reality even back in the 80's, and they *HATE* NFTs with a passion. I don't see this completely subsuming the internet as long as that's the case.
Sounds like it's a new scam after thinking about it longer
Take a step back and realize not all rare things are desired. Do you want to buy my used toilet? No? Then it's not "faux scarcity". It's demand... demand based on marketing, perceived value, etc...
this is just a modern version of "buying a star"
You just unlocked a very deep memory of the existence of this bullcrap
You can't build a gaming experience or buy art or exchange money or take a course or even shop on a star.. in Decentraland.. you CAN..! let this sink in
@@mohammadomirah2611 2 years ago (edited)
"You can't build a gaming experience or buy art or exchange money or take a course or even shop on a star.. in Decentraland.. you CAN..! let this sink in"
Why would I choose Decentraland over Godot or Unreal for game development? Decentraland doesn't even support VR.
Would be interesting to see how one would leave digital assets behind in their will. How would it work?
digital assets are nfts on a blockchain. For nfts to exist in a blockchain, that blockchain has to have smart contracts. So you could transfer digital assets with smart contracts that deposits them on other wallets instantly
NFTs
lol hack the will so that all the assets are under ur name...
Not the digital will!🤣🤣 Next it will be digital power of attorney and digital funeral. What's next a digital crematory 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Don't steal my ideas Mr. Zuckerberg!!!!!!!
Virtual land is worth less than shit.
Rockstar would probably say different considering it earns them $1 billion a year
Said while posting this comment on TH-cam and not Vimeo or Dailymotion
NGMI
Does cryptocurrency have no value because you can't touch it? Is ad space on a website that companies pay for worth nothing because it's not tangible? Everything is worth something to someone
@@Jellyblob Actual cryptocurrency like Bitcoin has value because it has utility as a method of payment for virtual transactions. Our technology as it is now is not capable of actually producing virtual land that has long-lasting utility. The example used in the video only has value because its users actually assign it a value. Once that value is gone, the virtual land itself becomes useless.
Decentraland is going to be the Atari of the Metaverse in a few years
How so
So we gonna ignore Second Life, IMVU, RuneScape, or Habbo?
@@william_8844 Take a look at new projects coming up like Blocktopia and Netvrk
*
Agreed, it's a first mover and will be it's downfall
I recommend reading:
- "Society of The Spectacle" by Guy Debord
- "Simulacra and Simulation" by Jean Baudrillard
Like, how is there so many people simply going with this nonsense? What is going on?
Most people aren't it seems, it's just that people who have a financial interest in everyone buying into it are doing their best to make it seem like everyone's all in on it. Don't be fooled, these people will fawn over anything NFT related because their investments in it needs them to.
how does this help the actual world that we live in?? lmao
It’s supposed to escape use from the actual world while they control it and do whatever they want lmfaooo distraction just invest make money off it cause it will happen
more people spending time in the virtual world means less people destroying the planet
@@fallenlu9039 Bro, they will not be able to control things in the real world, because everyone and everything will be in the metaverse, politics, economy, everything, so if they would like to control the society, they’ll need to control us by the metaverse, real life is going to be your real scape
Look at it like an expansion, a life experience expansion, you’ll have real world limited by nature, and digital world, limited by imagination
@@bujhir6184 maybe it's the start of the future.. first step to the matrix
Gamers have finally managed to make money out of their hobby and making us all think it is the next step in evolution when is just a game of Farmville but way more expensive..well played gamers ,well played!
It's more than that. Someone in the multi verse might be buying your neighborhood without the real world knowing. You think you own your parents real estate in the meta verse? Think again. Someone else will. It's coming near you.
How could someone in a video game buy a real life neighborhood, that idea alone is just flat out dumb lol
@@houliolio1471 well tell that to the people who will be willing to pay prime prices for a house in the fing metsverse!!
It’d be cool to “visit” places and people, and create art. anything else just seems like future Ai apocalypse
I find it a bit funny that Metaverse are being considered as a great new idea a real revolution... when Second Life came out in 2003.
history repeats itself 🤷♀️
I agree, the hype in mainstream news lately is weird. Video games have essentially been creating metaverses for the past couple decades. With their own digital economy and currency. But all of a sudden people act as if it is a brand new and exciting concept.
@@j6873 it is all brand new because of the progression of AR and VR towards the metaverse..
But now it's decentralised and we can use crypto.
Crypto and VR are two life-changing technologies that empower the metaverse and obviously didn't exist in 2002.
Meanwhile the majority of people are hoping their money will pay the bills and buy some tangibles.....people are lucky to have money to buy land on the real planet let alone in some fake ass virtual reality!
This is just a fad. I don't think this is even what Facebook has in mind honestly. It's just second life but with NFTs. Who cares?
The guy talks about not needing a regulatory office to build a skyscraper...yeah you also aren't building a skyscraper. I can visit a virtual skyscraper for free already.
Yes! Exactly! Mark's plan couldn't be this. It's about improving the quality of the internet. Turning internet into MetaverseWhere you could have serious meeting, like business deals in person, but virtual. You can do your transactions virtualy in person, BUT with legal saftly.
@@alanvictor3156 I wouldn't totally agree. I think they plan to have a combination of a VR WeWork and the all-in-one gaming sphere that Microsoft attempted with Xbox, PC, and Zune/Windows Phone, which all could access Xbox Live, and eventually continuity developed across them, though Zune and the phone died.
This is blockchain version. It's past the desktop versions you've known so far. It's decentralized that's the appeal. Crypto money will flow into it.
@@h.c4898 I understand what an NFT is. But since it holds no value other than speculation, it makes no sense to be interested in this fake real estate.
@@Mutantcy1992
Imagine a new platform (DAO) comes up with the idea of surveying the entire planet, soon you'll be able to purchase digital lands based on real life surveys. What if you decide to buy your entire neighborhood where your house is, the entire estate now belongs to you digitally. If your neighbors find out about it don't you think it'll spark some mind buggling curiosity? I think it will.
Let's say Elon musk (Tesla) decides to buy Epstein's island on that platform, In real life it belongs to the Epstein Estate but digitally it belongs to Musk. One day they might ask Musk to sell it back to them for a billion$ I'm just speculating at this point.
I keep an open mind to new concepts. It makes sense and all but what happens when people lose interest? They move onto the next best video game and you can't sell your digital assets for half of what you paid? Then your equity plummets. Although this can happen in the real world, it's hard to argue that REAL land will exist whether we use it or not, and has real intrinsic value while these digital assets can disappear and seem to be based purely on people's emotions, and emotions like the wind change direction!
Hell, the use of real estate as a speculative investment is the root cause of a *lot* of problems right now, why would tou *ever* want to replicate that online to begin with?
A standard for such ethereal real-estate exists, internet domain names. This just looks like a breaking down of one standard into several competing standards to me.
Agreed. One would say that you are stating the obvious, but there are gonna be those who are gullible or immature enough (mostly youngsters?) who are gonna part with their money for this, and someone is gonna profit. I too wonder how long this "fad" will last, but even Facebook is interested to try to capitalize on this.
Same thing happened 150yrs ago when folks would buy up land where the railroad was *supposed* to go, hoping to build or sell when the land shot up in value. Which worked... except when the railroad went elsewhere, leaving them with a plot of worthless land in the middle of nowhere.
This is why it's important to learn history - the tech changes, but human psychology stays the same.
I don’t think people see the future to well. These lockdowns are not going to end. They will be called climate lockdowns, traveling will be limited to the elite private planes, ships etc. even cars will be owned by corporations. You will own nothing and be happy. You want to go some where call an autonomous ev, if you have not over spent your personal carbon credit. 2030!
Then a hacker comes along and does a drop table sql command
I remember running around in second life a long time ago. And whilst it was lovely for a few nights, i didn't get why i should stick around longer. It's like staring through the glass of a high end up shop, knowing you cannot afford, so why bother staring at all? And the best part of this video is that you haven't explained why i should visit these metaverses. Nobody seems to be able to tell me why i should...
A furry instance on VRChat has more to offer the average person than anything in this "metaverse" ever will.
I had the same experience with second life and also don't understand what should be any better in a metaverse or why "fake online identities of a better version of the people" should be something I want to see more of. I mean we already have instagram ... :-D
Isn't the appeal something similar to why you would join Facebook for the first time? You do it because everyone else is on there. So they have to build a critical mass of users and create a network effect to bring other people on board until even the most casual people are joining just because.
Because there is no reason. Nothing in the metaverse puts food on your table or gas/electricity in your car. Virtual shoes won't protect your actual feet. A virtual gym won't actually get you healthy. Some might argue it's no different than paying for stuff in a game and they might be right in some sense but the fun of a game is the game. If you don't have that, why bother? I'd rather save my money and take an actual trip to see the Eiffel Tower than pay to stare at a bunch of pixels pretending to be the Eiffel Tower.
Don’t play the game. Just buy and sell it.
They only talk about freedom and creativity, but then it's all about speculation and spending tons of money.
Lol not how this works guy
Unless we solve the climate change problems, this digital land will be useless bogus, great video as usual though, glad that you always include pros and cons
Yes, it will actually speed things up as people will turn off more and more.
Here in Houston Tx, its About to be january and its hot af outside smh
What was my guy grabbing at 7:50 ??? Lol
Lmfaoooooo
Hahaha I am dying over here! 😂Thank you for sharing this! Can't. Stop. Watching.
StaahhP 😭🍄
Maybe this is stupidly at its finest.
Just like a cow im going to milk it for its riches.
or vice versa, your comment could be the standard of the stupidity when everything builds on metaversa and becomes the norm next 5-6 years.
In finance, the greater fool theory suggests that one can sometimes make money through the purchase of overvalued assets - items with a purchase price drastically exceeding the intrinsic value - if those assets can later be resold at an even higher price.
In this context, one "fool" might pay for an overpriced asset, hoping that he can sell it to an even "greater fool" and make a profit. This only works as long as there are new "greater fools" willing to pay higher and higher prices for the asset. Eventually, investors can no longer deny that the price is out of touch with reality, at which point a sell-off can cause the price to drop significantly until it is closer to its fair value, which in some cases could be zero.
This was tried with Second Life in the early 2000s to 2010s and didn't go very far.
Don’t underestimate how much more stupid people are nowadays…
Technology is somewhat better now than in 2000
@@QualicSelf Technology is better, but the idea isn't and that was why it failed with Second Life.
When people's online lives are better than their real ones, they'll abandon their real lives.
True but eventually it'll corrupt them and leave them feeling hollow, these things have been proven time and time again
To make metaverse fun, they need to give us missions so that we can turn our vr money to real ones.
Make money, have fun
Play to earn is here and here in a big way my friend. #BlockchainGaming
So a job… you want a virtual job. 🤣🤣🤣
totally as our world becomes a computer game the assets and tokens inside it will be more valuable than reality. best Jamie (MInd Chill)
You can convert crypto To irl money
Create your own art NFTs, buy a gallery in there and then expose them for sale.
My God, the Emperor's new clothes are BEAUTIFUL!
I hear the quote, but where's it from?
Beautiful. Excellent excellent comment
Yes , you get it.
everything seems good until the internet is down.. or PHYSICAL blackout
Exactly what financial, environmental, or social benefit is this supposed to have? Not even the most ardent supporters seem to be able to explain why we should want any of this in the first place
@Allan Copeland You didn't even attempt to answer my question. You think it's a good idea? Fine. Then you should be able to articulate the benefits or purpose this could serve. If you aren't able to, then YOU are the one who doesn't actually understand what they're doing
@@erinrenman1479 It shifts ownership away from big corporations to the individual.
@@ZERO-rz2go and who owns all these metaverses? The same big corporation.
@@cyrusthegreat7030 The people own it. It doesn't belong to any big corporations
@@ZERO-rz2go No one owns it, this platform is only the first one and int he future many more are gonna come the exact same way so the facade of "you own it" is false since someone else can get th same property on another meta verse and even worse what do you think it's gonna happen when this platform they display here is no longer famous which is about to happen and all people hop into another more famous one? You're gonna be stuck with a virtual asset you cant even touch or hold.
this feels more like an advertisement for dumb crypto scams than any an interesting story. Not enough focus was put on the dangers of this unregulated speculative hellscape.
Or... awareness... are we living in a metaverse already? ?
@@realryder2626 you cannot live in a metaverse. It’s a f*cking game.
@@travelblade2k ok.. let me expand your mind.. electricity didn't exist 150 years go... then, transistor tech didn't exist until 1953, now we are making phones with a million times the power of a computer from 1980 which in 1960 would take up an entire warehouse.... then, add in say... about 100,000 years of development... and.. you sir, could quite well be in a simulation and not even know it
I think we are still about 30 years away before this thing actually looks good.
It won't replace a warm shower, real food or a comfy bed or pets or kids or partners.
highly doubt it. facebook is investing $10billion into its metaverse in just one year. This is coming sooner than we expect.
@@ynerome28
I hope so. Id like to enjoy it while Im still somewhat young.
More like 5
Tech is progressing exponentially, we will be there in 1-3 years instead of 30
Wolfs of Wall Street meet Animal Crossing LOL
Is this video an ad for a scam?
nope see the end of the vid
This looks so much worse than second life
Pov the creators only know how to animate in 12 fps :
TBH, Second life looks pretty awful too
Second Life. This is just fucking Second Life.
It seems to me that the natural world is the greatest source of excitement; the greatest source of visual beauty; the greatest source of intellectual interest. It is the greatest source of so much in life that makes life worth living.
David Attenborough
"This world is gonna face real world scrutiny. That is, ensure that it stays in the hands of the people". Yeah, because the real world did such an amazing job of doing exactly that 7n7
Oh my, I can just imagine some US congressional committee questioning Mark Zuckerberg about scamming their metaverse users out of their money. My German is not the best but I believe "zucker" means sugar, and "berg" means mountain. So he's got a mountain of sugar to "sell" you, or he is hoping for a mountain of "zuckers". I'm just trying to be facetious, this is all pretty sad to me.
It's all about extrinsic value. People create random and useless stuff and make money with it. It's the business model of the art world applied to virtual reality.
Also the same business model of wall street. At this point investors are just looking for excuses to sell nothing for millions.
Stocks: intangible slices of companies that aren't actually valued based on the company.,
Futures: intangible slices of things in the future which may or may not exist eventually.
Crypto: Literally intangible pieces of nothing.
NFTS are dumb and useless
I'm guessing big tech company guys will be like gods once this rolls out at scale.
Either a Digital Future or Scam of the Century.
Scam. It’s all a scam. Even with crypto. The government will eventually get its hands on it, whether directly or indirectly by monitoring every transaction
@@Ryan-ze9fz hahahah you bet. Australia's CommonWealth Bank is now going to accept Bitcoin! (Black Mirror - S01E02 / Fifteen Million Merits)
@@Ryan-ze9fz You're just mad we got into crypto early :)
I just can't comprehend how anyone is interested in this
potential profit lol and the ability to be and do whatever you want appeals to a large subset of people
They are going to force us
Get used to it old man.
because you can buy a land, set up a business, create revenue, art gallery, host a meeting, build a community and increase the land of the value without the interference from any centralized entity? Literally endless possibilities because of blockchain technologies.
If you think this is just a game with shitty graphics, with people spending money on 'jpegs' or 'fake houses' then you really wont get it..
Well I'll just enjoy the real world to myself I suppose lol
for somebody who doesn’t even like to play video games, this all looks like a more immersive version of a video game in which i still have no interest. i don’t see how investing real money into virtual property and what not would make my life richer and happier.
but hey, for all i care, i hope this just means that physical real estate will get cheaper and that i’ll be able to buy another property. or that people will be motivated to stay home so i can peacefully enjoy national parks and nature. i guess i like myself too much to be able to give my real life privileges for virtual reality property and wearables 😳
it wont, this is just people looking to profit other ways than the traditional systems. it is ripe for manipulation and in the end it will be used for money laundering and ponzi schemes and the developers of these world have no real reason to stop them either
This is why people can't tell the difference with reality and fantasy and that's why
I have $80,000 MANA.
Holding for 5-10 years 💪🏾
I wish I had bought more when it was around .80 😔
@@Rahel8811 already 4x’d my investment 😂
Digital images, videos and audios are not mend to be non-fungible. The entire idea behind these types of files is to make things fundamentally shareable and copyable - theoretically infinitely and lossless. Digital files have no original. If I make a GIF and send you a copy of it, we both own the original. Because that "original" is just a signal, an instruction for computers.
NFTs have the potential to make things better. But buying "original files" is an economic idolatry that could end in a huge disaster; and I'm not willing to repair the damage of some idiotic yuppies.
How does limiting the ability to enjoy digital art an improvement? Physical art is limited because of its tangibliliy. No such limitation exists for digital art. This is an advantage not a disadvantage
@@BitcoinMotorist Exactly!
You will own nothing and you will be happy because you will live the illusion of the matrix
Well said! I was thinking this the whole video.. the digital world is designed to be copyable and lossless.. it doesn't have the limitations of the physical world. So why are we opposing arbitrary limitations.. so dumb. Also you can't live, eat food, survive in these digital worlds. It's a Video GAME.
Such an entitled use of resources (money)..
land is even stupider, ah yes there is a limited number of land on this server so let me spend a million on it, all of a sudden the server admins greed makes him ad more land, open a second server etc. also why would a non bussniess ever buy a small amout of land? in the real world it can be expencive to create/buy new land , you might need to commute to work, they might have better social services. There are no commute times, no essential social services which are region spesific, or large cost to buying or selling land. These are pozi schemes ran buy private people and companies.
"The users own everything. The users decide where this goes." Heh. Haha. HAHAHA! BAAAAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH!
I know right. Hahahhahahahaha
This lol
Yeah usually owners decide because they own it
@@ThebirdsandThebees6000 they dont own shit. Just like your fb page if the owner decides to shut down your shit is gone. So no you dont own it
@@gsrhatch14 study NFTs a bit more my boi
It looks like a 20 year old video game. Which is quite fitting since these hyped virtual worlds have come and gone for 20 years.
Difference now is the technology is more advanced and will only get better. Dont be ignorant in thinkinking this won't be everyday life in the next 10 years
Do people realize they can just code their own world instead of buying into someone else's?
Yeah but Blockchain, crypto , decentralized, NFT, Meta meta METAAaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!
@@ricovee9715 this makes no relation to my comment though
@@skiey3892 Meta?
@@ricovee9715 My comment was about people adapting earthly concepts in a controlled digital metaverse. Buying digital land is useless because it's owned by 1 person, when soon there will be millions of creators coding their own worlds way more valuable than pots of land for sale that's modeled from earth
@UCxZVj8iS_bXjEoHH-2M38NA I really don't know. I'm just throwing out buzz words people use . I understand what you were saying . I was more so trolling the people who would disagree with you and argue that u don't understand block chain and blah blah blah
How are they gonna say it's built by the users for the user? Did they ignore the sixers in ready player one! Your telling me the elites of the world aren't gonna find a way to take over the metaverse!
Okay, now I believe my "spirit guides" are just people playing in my Metaverse.
Lol. The metaverse is also profitable👌
Wait till you get your consciousness downloaded into this hellscape!
All of this, is just unregulated securtization for assets you don't want the government to know about. It holds value like art does, as long as someone is willing to pay you more for it then what you bought it for. REAL estate in IRL is highly regulated by city,state,and federal laws, and it's taxed as so. I wouldn't be surprised if the SEC comes down and slams Decentraland and others as Securities thus forcing them to be subject to regulation. When that happens the partys over, value will plunge as everyone will try to sell at the same time to avoid the IRS, or be banned from Decentraland all together.
That's exactly what the crypto space is about. Centraland Meta verse is no different. Has the gov made any progress in banning crypto since 2008 at the rise of Bitcoin? Zero. This thing is gonna go forward I'm telling you with the gov or without its participation. Govs and financial institutions made enough damages to the value of its legal tender for years, screwing up its own constituents nobody said nothing. The blockchain will achieve that. 😄 It's not here to be gov and oligarch friendly I'm telling you.
Land in the physical world is limited hence it should hold a certain value.
But anybody can create empty land on the internet which makes land in the virtual world actually abundant.
How can anything hold value if it is abundant. Plus even if we own land on the internet on any of the websites, what would happen if these websites suddenly cease to exist?
Concept of the virtual land seems seriously flawed but I can see the future of metaverse, it feels absurd at first but is somewhat reasonable and feasible given the situation and technology today.
Great points Unnat Sadh! There's still a lot to be developed and worked out, and the risk of an abundance of metaverses / lack of scarcity of virtual land is definitely a concern.
This is insane, seems like a form of gambling through aspiration marketing, how is the real cash profit made in these virtual worlds? Other then the goggles. (Is it mainly monthly online membership fees, do real companies buy advertising space, are people paying real dollars for 'virtual' goods or what?)
Because of the blockchain technology you're able to monetize in this universe. It's decentralized. It's not lik in-app purchases you can do in your regular mobile games. It's money circulating in the blockchain between nodes, no governments or financial institutions dictating the markets or causing inflations. It's pretty exciting. It creeps govs and banks out.
Imagine that you buy your neighborhood in the meta verse. You own your neighbors' real estates in the meta verse. If they get tech savvy enough down the road and enter the same meta verse as you they will see their virtual lands doesn't belong to them but to you. They might ask you to purchase it back to them. You can now bargain. It's like opening a website you need to purchase a domain name. Domain names are virtual address it's non tangble however you need it to open a website. It's basically the same principle that applies.
Wow, man. I don't even have money to pay next month's rent.
Someones is making to much money if they have change to use for this.
Such a crazy world. Everyone should watch until the end to see the issues that all of this brings up. Glad cheddar is taking a middle ground stance on this.
I think they didnt hit hard enough on a potential issue, what if ppl like with they would with any video game stop carring about this world and new ppl would stop coming in? This would be the end of everyones investment. Wouldnt it?
I honestly am ashamed they gave this good will in the beginning even if they are taking the middle ground approach, this is a shitcoin scam or whatever else you wanna call it. Too many people are jumping in on this bubble already and its just disgraceful reporting on their part to just make it seem so cool and flashy from what they say first instead of just saying it how it is.
Thanks! There's good, bad and A LOT of unknowns.
Like it or not, this is part of the future and people are making a lot of money in the process. Adapt or miss out.
Miss out maddafakka
It's true buddy. I know I am 😌👍
Why are you letting this guy just promote his shitcoin by saying 'you can buy things and it can go up' without challanging or mentioning that it can also go down and just become worthless, if people stop being interested in digital items without any material benefit in the real world? The only time this a aluded to at all is in an half sentence at 5:15 -.-
Wow. Some of the questions raised in the comment section gives so much of clarity and uncertainty wether this will work or not
What you think...
How do you create buildings? Does it cost? Do you buy materials? The whole building? Mine for it?
You hire a 3D Artist and he will make the building for you
i bet you have two buy land or rent for real money
Dead ass VR CHAT. Mark at it again
Metaverse is really a done deal, now that it has been merged with NFTs and crypto tokens the possibilities are endless. In the field of fitness and gaming StepApp Metaverse and it ecosystem has created a platform where users exercise to earn $Fitfi tokens. Its SDK protocols also gives opportunity to developers to create their own content.
These videos are my life
@qgedave greatest comment of all time.🏆
Sad 😔
you poor kid. You have no idea what you are missing out on
This was a very educational ad, thank you.
I’ll stick to Minecraft servers still, though.
1:35 funny, because as soon as there is money to be made, the big corporations will jump in and buy everything.
Personally I don't like were it's all headed. Games used to be just for fun, now they are slowly evolving into another job where you have to go into lifetime of debt just to be a part of it.
Ehh until the tech gets way better to the point where the experience is immersive and mostly frictionless (like RPO) I don't really see this being anything more than upgraded 2nd life. Like why the hell would you log on to this and walk around a virtual mall. It's just a super annoying crappy version of Amazon. Let's circle back to this in 2040 and we'll see then.
I am not in favor of turning the internet into a video game. I prefer real life!
Scary right?
How do you know we are not "living" in a metaverse? Maybe god is a computer programmer and this universe is his metaverse creation.
@@kamX-rz4uy He is far far better at it than this garbage then. Plus we are actually built in to this universe rather than just pretending to be from it.
@@octopusgoodness1909 We built our world like we will built the meta verse how much of your life is truly "natural"?
The forest you like to walk in, is probably planted by Humans. The park you like is definitely created by humans. And the reason why you can step out your door and not get eaten by a animal is because we hunt everything down that is dangerous to us.
We are Creator and Child of our own environment.
True Natur is a not caring beautiful war were ever body tries to get more time by doing there thing because time is the only limiting factor in life.
Have a great day 👍🏻
YOU HAVE SUCH A MASSIVE AMMOUNT OF MOMEY AND THOSE ARE YOUR GRAPHICS? WTF ARE PEOPLE BLIND OR REGRESSING OR SOMETHING
So it’s a game with extremely expensive in game purchases?