Was that a nuclear blast? Turns out he was 100% bluffing😂😂 why would you think firing an empty missile that barely did any damage whatsoever was Putin following through with his nuclear threat?
@@karlvonbahnhof6594Putin fanboys are easily impressed. Ukraine just fired a bunch more ATACMS & Stormshadow/Scalp missiles deep into Russia. Looks like Zelensky called princess Putin’s bluff😂
@@joescott8877 sorry man. its like a meating and he congrets everyone with the succesful experiment. and they will use this new thing to act acordenly to the situation. this is the meat of it basicly
It’s a light show, it barely does any damage?! Honestly it looked like the warheads pretty much burnt up before they impacted. Iskanders do *_WAY MORE_* damage. There wasn’t even a blast from any of the impacts
There was no warhead in that demonstration... They are saying they don't want to demonstrate even with conventional munitions, but people are stubborn with no imagination it seems. Only when there is no other option and reality hits in the head do some people start thinking about how to explain why they were wrong all along.
@ that’s called getting your bluff called. Putin won’t fire nukes, iskanders, Kalibers, Khinzal, all were/are nuclear capable weapons and Putin’s been firing those for the past 2 years every day. He won’t use nukes because that would be the end of Moscow, St. Petersburg and every Russian military base on the planet. You’re an idiot if you believe that Russia barely a regional power after the fall of the USSR can fight the U.S. an actual superpower. Putin has said as much, how it would be suicide to fight NATO. Russia completely dependent on Iranian and North Korean aid shipments just to hold on to what little he has in southern Ukraine that he’s already lost the entire Soviet stockpiles and more men and equipment than America has lost in the past century of war excluding WW2 but including WW1, Korean War, Vietnam war, Panama, Grenada, desert storm, Afghanistan war(Russia loses more men than America lost in this 20 year war *_every 2 days_* ) Iraq war, Syria, war against ISIS. All in 2 & a half years and for nothing except some ruined farmland and a few destroyed and useless towns and villages. Anyways Zelensky called Putin’s bluff and has fired many more atacms and stormshadows into Russia so let’s see if he follows through and actually nukes something or backs down like every other time
@ then it burned up before impact because even without explosive the kinetic energy would have caused a explosion where it hit and there was nothing, it looked like sparklers shooting down. Might be scary with nuclear warheads but completely useless without them and Putin isn’t firing a nuke any time soon so it’s a empty threat
This clown/ comedian has no idea what's going on ...he is saying that Russia is using other countries to commit terrorism in Ukraine.... what about Ukraine using all the NATO countries to strike Russia this guy is mentally challenged and at the same time he's simply hilarious
In wartime especially, Mister Escalation ALWAYS flirts with Miss Calculation. Both sides are to blame for dancing with our obliteration, but Zelensky and NATO/Biden the most.
@@АлександрПустовалов-ь5в Even so, he is SOMEBODY in the west that kept escalating sicne the war started. If west start to deescalate the conflict, the Russia will follow, its in their(your) interests.
He might not be able to do so. As Biden administration openly stated, they are trying to make Trump-proof NATO and the support for Ukraine..... And they have about 2 months to get us into a nuclear war .... dont underastimate their stupidity.
The West, NATO, and America underestimated Russia, believing it to be an easy target. Now, if the U.S. claims it was an IRBM (Intermediate-Range Ballistic Missile) and not an ICBM (Intercontinental Ballistic Missile) that couldn't be intercepted, what would happen if Russia deployed its superior ICBMs instead? Taiwan should take a lesson from Ukraine's experience: relying solely on the West, NATO, and the U.S. for security might prove precarious. Ukraine was arguably encouraged to resist Russia militarily, only to now face the risk of being left to bear the consequences alone. The situation has allowed Western powers to test and display their military capabilities, but it serves as a reminder that external support often comes with limitations and strategic interests that may not fully align with those of the nation in need.
@@KatarinaP-u6r "We didn't loose anything over Ukraine" Putin 2023 PS: I've checked oryx, where there are only confirmed losses with photos and description, 18 thousand military machines destroyed so far, but the real number must be much higher 😮😂
@@karlvonbahnhof6594 The same Oryx that is PROVEN that count photos from diferent angles of same thing as diffrenet things? And even so, currently Russia military production surpass the entirty of NATO in most areas, in same even at 8:1 Ratio. But let me ask you something.... In april 2022 Ukraine anounced they already have over 1 000 000 man in army, since then they mobilised over aditional 1 000 000, just in 2023 they had nearly 300 000 "volanteers", not counting 2022, when they had even more, and 2024. That sum up to over 2 300 000 man. Now they say Russia have about 650 000 troops in Ukraine and they ARE OUTNUMBERED. 2 300 000 MINUS 650 000 is 1 550 000, if they have only 31 000 dead, what happand to those 1 519 000 troops? Did they got one way ticked for vacation in Valhala or something?
@@karlvonbahnhof6594 Yes I agree Russia has many losses, Ukraine has much higher losses though in all areas. You can cope and argue alll you want but Russia cannot be defeated. By anyone for that matter.
@@KatarinaP-u6r If Ukraine has bigger losses, it doesn't mean, Putin is right... Like when Germany crushed Poland in WW2, it didn't mean, Hitler was right... It's dangerous precedent, when a stronger country takes a weaker country because they have a bigger army and more resources....
Another abandon barn thats putins response the guy is harmless i cant believe people that fall for his great swelling words should be ashamed of yourselves
That thing looks like lightning. That's how fast it is.
New shovel unlocked?
Putin is trying to convince Russians, Russia is NOT at war with Ukraine, but in the same time, Russia is at war with the whole NATO 😂
That's right
Ukraine is not a member of NATO.
Сколько сумасшедших у вас, и ты в том числе. А почему? Потому что "зомби" пропаганды.
Not convince it’s how it is
@@wysonali5287 if NATO was involved, there would be NO Russian army in Ukraine...it would be something like operation Desert Storm, only 10x bigger
Turns out the bear wasn't bluffing 😂
@@Foodwithoutlabels turns out, he was bluffing actually, I didn't see any nukes flying 🤡😂
When that does happens it's the end of the bots
Was that a nuclear blast? Turns out he was 100% bluffing😂😂 why would you think firing an empty missile that barely did any damage whatsoever was Putin following through with his nuclear threat?
@@karlvonbahnhof6594Putin fanboys are easily impressed. Ukraine just fired a bunch more ATACMS & Stormshadow/Scalp missiles deep into Russia. Looks like Zelensky called princess Putin’s bluff😂
So there's no intercepter for this if it had (or if they had placed) a nuke on it?
Is it that fast?
If not, what intercepters can?
Yes Agreed.. RUSSIA needs to test all thier missiles..
Brawo Rosja !!! Pozdrowienia od Polaka-Słowianina.
Don't mess around with Russia!
НЕ ЗЛИТЕ РОССИЮ МАТУШКУ
3:27 greenscreen zelenskiy 😂. Comedian hiding in Paris & fooling his people.
Zelensky is killing his own people for money
@@alanpoole4249 seems so
Message well received.
omg i speak russian this translation is not correct...its like someone who cant speak russian translated it wtf is this
Well then, what did he "really" say then, please?
@@joescott8877 i translated and then it got deleted im sorry
@@styxinclouds4747 SURE
@@styxinclouds4747 Fair enuf. Thx for letting me know!
@@joescott8877 sorry man. its like a meating and he congrets everyone with the succesful experiment. and they will use this new thing to act acordenly to the situation. this is the meat of it basicly
It’s a light show, it barely does any damage?! Honestly it looked like the warheads pretty much burnt up before they impacted. Iskanders do *_WAY MORE_* damage. There wasn’t even a blast from any of the impacts
There was no warhead in that demonstration... They are saying they don't want to demonstrate even with conventional munitions, but people are stubborn with no imagination it seems. Only when there is no other option and reality hits in the head do some people start thinking about how to explain why they were wrong all along.
@ that’s called getting your bluff called. Putin won’t fire nukes, iskanders, Kalibers, Khinzal, all were/are nuclear capable weapons and Putin’s been firing those for the past 2 years every day. He won’t use nukes because that would be the end of Moscow, St. Petersburg and every Russian military base on the planet. You’re an idiot if you believe that Russia barely a regional power after the fall of the USSR can fight the U.S. an actual superpower. Putin has said as much, how it would be suicide to fight NATO. Russia completely dependent on Iranian and North Korean aid shipments just to hold on to what little he has in southern Ukraine that he’s already lost the entire Soviet stockpiles and more men and equipment than America has lost in the past century of war excluding WW2 but including WW1, Korean War, Vietnam war, Panama, Grenada, desert storm, Afghanistan war(Russia loses more men than America lost in this 20 year war *_every 2 days_* ) Iraq war, Syria, war against ISIS. All in 2 & a half years and for nothing except some ruined farmland and a few destroyed and useless towns and villages. Anyways Zelensky called Putin’s bluff and has fired many more atacms and stormshadows into Russia so let’s see if he follows through and actually nukes something or backs down like every other time
Yes, that was just without payload. Only kinetic force.
@ then it burned up before impact because even without explosive the kinetic energy would have caused a explosion where it hit and there was nothing, it looked like sparklers shooting down. Might be scary with nuclear warheads but completely useless without them and Putin isn’t firing a nuke any time soon so it’s a empty threat
Very smart very smart man he knows what trying to do swamp
God Bless You All, thanks for posting and thank you TH-cam amen
This clown/ comedian has no idea what's going on ...he is saying that Russia is using other countries to commit terrorism in Ukraine.... what about Ukraine using all the NATO countries to strike Russia this guy is mentally challenged and at the same time he's simply hilarious
Just like Satanyahu.
🇨🇳 sitting in the shadows waiting to take complete control of 🇮🇳....., 😉.....🇨🇳🇨🇳😁😁😁😁😁
Putin needs to stand easey for now
Не смейте трогать Россию!!!!
Long live Russia 🇷🇺
Long live Ukraine 🏳🌈
@OrbitalTrails-x5sсиди тихо
so Ukraine become a battlefield for testing weapons of West and East.
So far was the west, Russia is just starting ;)
Nato thought that by keeping the proxy joker against Russia , they could build a new world order
In wartime especially, Mister Escalation ALWAYS flirts with Miss Calculation.
Both sides are to blame for dancing with our obliteration, but Zelensky and NATO/Biden the most.
It was Zelensky speak few days ago that the missiles speak by themselves right?
Don't worry Trump will stop this😂😂😂 nonsense
Putin will decide when it ends
That's if Biden doesn't start WW3 before January 21
Он никто для России
@@АлександрПустовалов-ь5в Even so, he is SOMEBODY in the west that kept escalating sicne the war started. If west start to deescalate the conflict, the Russia will follow, its in their(your) interests.
He might not be able to do so. As Biden administration openly stated, they are trying to make Trump-proof NATO and the support for Ukraine..... And they have about 2 months to get us into a nuclear war .... dont underastimate their stupidity.
After he took the last of the money
sure but zelensky is jewish?
Russia's new weapon is quite impressive but Big Guy's 10% aint no slouch either $$$
The West, NATO, and America underestimated Russia, believing it to be an easy target. Now, if the U.S. claims it was an IRBM (Intermediate-Range Ballistic Missile) and not an ICBM (Intercontinental Ballistic Missile) that couldn't be intercepted, what would happen if Russia deployed its superior ICBMs instead?
Taiwan should take a lesson from Ukraine's experience: relying solely on the West, NATO, and the U.S. for security might prove precarious. Ukraine was arguably encouraged to resist Russia militarily, only to now face the risk of being left to bear the consequences alone. The situation has allowed Western powers to test and display their military capabilities, but it serves as a reminder that external support often comes with limitations and strategic interests that may not fully align with those of the nation in need.
Much ado about nothing.
This is so funny, the US had the Sprint missile back in 1975! It goes Mach 10 at low altitudes, it can maneuver, it can even carry a nuclear warhead!
uKrAInE iS wiNniNG
@@KatarinaP-u6r "We didn't loose anything over Ukraine" Putin 2023
PS: I've checked oryx, where there are only confirmed losses with photos and description, 18 thousand military machines destroyed so far, but the real number must be much higher 😮😂
@@karlvonbahnhof6594 The same Oryx that is PROVEN that count photos from diferent angles of same thing as diffrenet things? And even so, currently Russia military production surpass the entirty of NATO in most areas, in same even at 8:1 Ratio.
But let me ask you something.... In april 2022 Ukraine anounced they already have over 1 000 000 man in army, since then they mobilised over aditional 1 000 000, just in 2023 they had nearly 300 000 "volanteers", not counting 2022, when they had even more, and 2024. That sum up to over 2 300 000 man. Now they say Russia have about 650 000 troops in Ukraine and they ARE OUTNUMBERED. 2 300 000 MINUS 650 000 is 1 550 000, if they have only 31 000 dead, what happand to those 1 519 000 troops? Did they got one way ticked for vacation in Valhala or something?
@avengerpz I'm Czech, I know Russian language and their anthem, I despise them☠️🖕
@@karlvonbahnhof6594 Yes I agree Russia has many losses, Ukraine has much higher losses though in all areas. You can cope and argue alll you want but Russia cannot be defeated. By anyone for that matter.
@@KatarinaP-u6r If Ukraine has bigger losses, it doesn't mean, Putin is right... Like when Germany crushed Poland in WW2, it didn't mean, Hitler was right... It's dangerous precedent, when a stronger country takes a weaker country because they have a bigger army and more resources....
Putin is like having dirt on your face...you've got to wipe it clean off
Another abandon barn thats putins response the guy is harmless i cant believe people that fall for his great swelling words should be ashamed of yourselves
Oooh poor Ralph😂
На месте "Южмаша° воронка, завода больше не существует. А дома это то что вам хотят показать.
Hahaha 😂😂😂❤