Always happy to see a new upload from you. I don't own a Maverick yet, but I am planning on buying one within a year. Thanks for taking the time to film/upload! Appreciate it. 👍🏼🇺🇸
Hope to see them available. Looks like every single manufacturer has a waiting list for anywhere between 2 and 9 months on their vehicles here in México. I really want that little Maverick with the AWD, but a tremor edition would be perfect, with that locking rear dif, BFG trail terrains or KO2's, special wheels, etc. And that little thing with a tunning that takes it to 270-300hp and 320-350 torque... that would be a very fast and capable little pickup!
@@MrBoom50 yes, but sometimes my foot doesn't remember it's supposed to be in eco mode. No matter how efficient you burn the fuel it doesn't stop me from accelerating way more than practical for a few seconds every minute. Also tuning can be related to transmission shift points. Eco mode could change shift points to keep you in higher gears vs sport mode could do its best to keep you in the power band for max acceleration, and a tow mode could focus on max torque. I'd be really interested to find out if you see any change in mpg after getting this tune either way.
@@MrBoom50 that’s what a detune is. the concept of detuning engines is usually for work trims and commercial use, to increase MPG and reduce wear on an engine that sees heavy Loads and long hours thus making it more efficient (ex:fleet use) A 350 small block paired with a 4L80e in the ChevyExpress made less power than the 350 with the same trans in the Tahoe despite being in a heavy duty chassis compared to the tahoes 1/2ton chassis. The Van was more efficient than the Tahoe when factoring constantly higher payloads. It was also more efficient while towing even with more curb weight and the aero of a lunch box, “but the Tahoe could tow more overall to be fair” The 3.5 Ecoboost In the Transit makes 310hp and averages 16 mpg with shit panel van aero and fast connecting rods, while the ecoboost F150 makes 375hp and averages 18mpg, even with forged parts, better cooling, and weighing a whole 1000lbs less than the panel van! the raptor makes like 470hp and is averaging 15 mpg in the real world,. the only BIG difference mechanically for the 3 trucks is in the raptor, the rest is all tune.
Hey Mr boom that's a great video that you show about putting in the extra lights and stuff I mean top notch and professional I just have a few quick questions for you when you put on the blinker control the lights go yellow yellow and then when they hit the turn signal do they switch them to White or do they go still keep yellow and the other thing question I had for you is are you going to do anything with the fog lights down on the truck today some but the other guys are on the channel you without saying their names they posted that they put them on they look pretty good but I want to see what you can come up with it do you have any plans and one last question how much would the the small one the light bar be if I wanted to put the buy that for me and put that have that shipped up and I put that on my truck so one more time thank you very much and keep those videos coming buddy great
not gonna lie, i was expecting like 7-10lbs. 15-22 is crazy to me for a stock motor. im picking one of these up in the spring so this is good content, keep it up!
@@flyjum I was looking to order and they said people that pre ordered are still just now getting theirs, if I ordered today I would be looking at late summer so I'm waiting until the 2023 announcement, might have some revisions and a possible awd hybrid by then available.
The pre-military ad (dependant who saw it) seems the rest of the forces caught up w/ the Marine Corps Poolee Program... 1 year prior to boot, we needed to fulfill pretty strenuous PFT's to be eligible, and I'm glad this is getting adopted by a larger body. Now, back to your regularly scheduled programing...
What was used to "tune" the truck? Also its right on the screen that he is using "estimating dynojet numbers" which means he is most likely lowering the roller weight to "adjust" the numbers to be more like a dynojet. MD dyno's are the easist to manipulate.
Would appear to be making more than advertised. Nice! That, or your Maverick is extremely healthy and happy. I know our 2016 Escape Ecoboost gained power and fuel efficiency after 8k miles.
Advertised is flywheel numbers, if you take parasitic drag/loss into acount from the numbers mine made at the tire stock. Fords numbers are pretty spot on 🤙🤙
So how do they know how to set the correct road load for the test? Did they do a coast down test first to develop the equation? Many don’t realize how important that is.
Especially important for a torque based ECU strategy that dictates desired boost in relation to demanded torque model. This is often times why you may see LESS power and less boost on the dyno, and then take it out on the street and be boosting above the levels you thought you had set on the dyno.
@MrBoom_5.0 what are the specs on your 20" wheels? Are you running the same width and offset all the way around? Appreciate the content and the pioneering that you are doing on this new model...especially for those like me who are waiting for their maverick to arrive.
@@MrBoom50 ...one more...where'd u get that nice blue fitting that goes across the grill ? me ? 'sposed to take delivery on my HPR Lariat somewhere btwn 12/22-12/28. thnx again !
Nice video! My only interest in tuning the Maverick is to up the torque which should translate into higher tow capacity. Based on your #’s, any idea how much that would be?
I'm not an expert but I think what's limiting the tow capacity on the Maverick isn't the power available but the unibody construction and probably braking capacity.
@@pob122 it's the tongue weight that's limiting it. If it was sold in Europe, under European legislation it would be able to tow much more (in Europe) because of different tongue weight demands. (Trailer weight is more on center in Europe, in America it's closer to the rear of the vehicle)
@@jensfos Tow ratings are also higher in europe because almost any trailer has surge braking, so vehicles have a standard tow rating for trailers w/o brakes and a much higher one for trailers with brakes. Tongue weight isn't that important as you are supposed to balance your cargo so you won't exceed it. Also a lot of trailers allow to move the axle to different positions.
@@DanielDar13 Yes, but in general, the wheels on American trailers are further backwards, because it is much more stable at higher speeds. In Europe, you can't drive more than 80km/h towing, mostly because of the axle positions, but it's a compromise. Higher speeds and less weight, or more weight and lower speeds.
225whp stock is really good considering its an AWD truck which has a decent amount of driveline loss. Turboback exhaust and a nice intake with a good tune it might make 275whp or so on 93 octane. It would probably outrun a stock 5.0L F150 they run mid 14s or so if I remember right.
@@MrBoom50 that's nuts! I don't think I've seen a short box F-150 with the 5.0 up here in Vancouver, Canada. But I've always thought that would be the ultimate sleeper. Kind of the true (although discreet) successor to the lightning. Do you have any videos of that truck?
I'd be surprised if the computer was putting any power to the rear wheels in 4th gear. This is a part time AWD system, putting power to the back when its slipping only.
Yeah, the stock maverick hybrid and Ecoboost both ran 15s, which is very impressive, especially for that hybrid. As someone who's ordering the hybrid, I'm happy to see it has a fair amount of kick to it.
If I had to guess Ford screwed the intercoolers up on these and you'll need better intercooler for any really power stability. Every 2.0ltr I helped build all had extremely small intercoolers.
E30, intake, intercooler, and downpipe should get you max of the stock engine/turbo combination. Im following! On gen1 on the ST with above mods we were able to get 280-290hp on average and 375-400ftlbs of torque.
Dealers look at how many times the car has been started after being flashed back to stock. So if a car has 5 starts, obviously it was just flashed back to stock. If it has 300+ starts, that tells them it probably hasn’t been tuned. That’s how they saw my Ford was tuned.
To be honest, I not big on Fords besides Thunderbirds, Rangers, and Broncos. I have to say, I would totally own a Maverick if I could get the ecoboost AWD
I mean. We've done minimal tuning and swapped to e30 and made a solid increase and broken into the 13s in the 1/4. If we can hit the 300whp mark I'd be thrilled.
Great looking truck the new Goliath Chevy is a 800hp good ground clearance but nice trucks just a Chevy person like the old gm engines being all are interchangeable easy and simple to work on
@@bradkaberline5828 This video is about the Ford Maverick. Your comment rambles about a GM engine that nobody is going to own, then into ground clearance, then some jibberish about old GM engines. Try talking about one thing at a time, using punctuation, and staying on point.
@@MrBoom50 yes sir understood, but they have a good history with the 2.3 ecoboost on the mustang.i don't think the cpu perimeters wouldn't be much different.btw thanks for the vid
@@MrBoom50 I retract my statement, I thought 220hp was the rated power for the maverick, turns out it's 250. I recently tuned my golf TDI 4motion 150hp and it made 154 eng hp and 101 wheel hp stock. (182,4 eng hp and 125.5 wheel hp tuned, with 421nm or 310.5 ib ft) Ca 50hp is lost from the flywheel to the wheels on mine, with a similar four wheel drive system, so the fact that you only lost about 30 is impressive, if that Dyno is accurate.
Let's hope so, can you imagine a Maverick st with 300-350 horsepower? I could see them using either the 2.3, or 2.7 ebs. Would be awesome, I'll stick with the hybrid, but I hope Ford makes a more performance oriented maverick to appeal to consumers such as yourself.
There is no point to tune the hybrid as it wont result in much if any power gains. Modern cars that are not turbo dont gain much power from tunes unless they have additional mods like full exhaust intake manifolds cams ect. Plus its a hybrid which only runs the gas engine like half the time.
@@flyjum Even with standard aftermarket parts, the gains are extremely small on naturally aspirated. If you get any at all. You'd be talking engine teardown and overhaul. Parts may or may not exist. A hybrid tune might be possible for the electric motor. Finding a shop that is capable of fudging the motors numbers and not create a fire hazard is a different story. I've never heard of one.
Nah. Comments like the one you posted are stupid though. When 90% of the views on videos are from folks not subscribed.. a little "reminder" goes a long way.
I like how you are showing maverick info which is seriously lacking on TH-cam. BUT MY GUY…. You have to up you game on video production. You videos are so hard to watch sometimes. It’s like my 16 year old son is making a TH-cam video.
It's dirt cheap vehicle.... the more shit ford adds the more the price goes up. If it was a horrible decision ford wouldn't be selling this exponentially faster than they can produce them. 99/100 people aren't gunna give two shits if it had manual mode or not
Ummmmm, Ford made this truck for me and a bunch of other people who aren’t trying to read line it at every stop light. Why would I want to pay for paddle shift?
Stop with the Dynojet Vs Mustang Dyno shit. I have customers bring me tuned vehicles with a Mustang Dyno sheet in hand. Always saying the same thing." It would be higher on a DynoJet". BS, the first I did was three pulls on a DynoJet to compare. Always with in a few either way. It would depend on the temp's, humidity and atmosphere at the time of testing. Also what correction factor was used. Both are good a Dyno to use for testing and tuning. Any good tuner will be able to work with either one. Nice truck you have. I think they will be a big sales hit for Ford. Good luck with it.
Yes a tuner can work with either one. Dynos ultimately are just a tuning tool. The numbers provided by then should be taken as such. Its not news the mustang dyno loads differently then a dynojet, or even eddy current and superflow dynos
![THE TOYS x NONT TANONT - ดอกไม้ที่รอฝน (spring) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pPa1d5cC8M4/mqdefault.jpg)
That's honestly really good numbers for a fully stock truck!
I'm happy!
Please take this truck to TFL trucks and race one of theirs it would be awesome
I'm a nobody lol, they have no clue who I am or I'd gladly do so
@@MrBoom50 they will 😆 it would be great for their channel and yours
@trucker 9000 I drive all around for less lol. Denver would be a fun road trip haha
Yessss
Always happy to see a new upload from you. I don't own a Maverick yet, but I am planning on buying one within a year.
Thanks for taking the time to film/upload! Appreciate it. 👍🏼🇺🇸
BTW, I LOVE the headlights. 🔥👍🏼👍🏼
Thank you! It means alot and makes the little bit of time worth it!
lol, My boi not only had a Man Bun, but he's also wearing Daisy Duke shorts!
🤣🤣🤣🤣
😂😂😂😂
Lmfao 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Nice man! We need to see some 0-60s now. I love this truck.
It rained last night! Should be clear today/tonight. That's the plan!
@@MrBoom50 5s?!
Hope to see them available. Looks like every single manufacturer has a waiting list for anywhere between 2 and 9 months on their vehicles here in México.
I really want that little Maverick with the AWD, but a tremor edition would be perfect, with that locking rear dif, BFG trail terrains or KO2's, special wheels, etc. And that little thing with a tunning that takes it to 270-300hp and 320-350 torque... that would be a very fast and capable little pickup!
I wish you could get the tow package with the locking diff
I am watching these improvements , I have high hopes for mine soon, great work guys..
Thank you!
@@MrBoom50 I have my 22 maverick lariat awd on order hope to get it soon:)
@@protouringnova72 I hope you get it soon also!!
@@MrBoom50 I ordered it at dealer and my email I got to check the status is still on the number 1 lol
@@protouringnova72 Did you receive your order yet? Any thoughts on it so far?
I have an XLT Ecoboost FWD and very curious about this. A tune with a bov sounds fun.
My dad showed me your content i love your maverick and i cant wait to get mine
🙌🙌🙌
There have been so manny reviews of the maverick and there all good reviews. I can’t wait to get mine i ordered in july2021
I love mine, glad I got it for sure!
Thanks for the interesting tunes for power and torque.
Be interesting to see a de-tune for MPG.
This would be great, a true eco mode getting 30mpg, and then a sport mode for 6s 0-60 times. Change between them using the dashboard.
..... making a vehicle more efficient will help fuel economy.
@@MrBoom50 yes, but sometimes my foot doesn't remember it's supposed to be in eco mode.
No matter how efficient you burn the fuel it doesn't stop me from accelerating way more than practical for a few seconds every minute.
Also tuning can be related to transmission shift points.
Eco mode could change shift points to keep you in higher gears vs sport mode could do its best to keep you in the power band for max acceleration, and a tow mode could focus on max torque.
I'd be really interested to find out if you see any change in mpg after getting this tune either way.
@@MrBoom50 that’s what a detune is. the concept of detuning engines is usually for work trims and commercial use, to increase MPG and reduce wear on an engine that sees heavy Loads and long hours thus making it more efficient (ex:fleet use)
A 350 small block paired with a 4L80e in the ChevyExpress made less power than the 350 with the same trans in the Tahoe despite being in a heavy duty chassis compared to the tahoes 1/2ton chassis. The Van was more efficient than the Tahoe when factoring constantly higher payloads. It was also more efficient while towing even with more curb weight and the aero of a lunch box, “but the Tahoe could tow more overall to be fair”
The 3.5 Ecoboost In the Transit makes 310hp and averages 16 mpg with shit panel van aero and fast connecting rods, while the ecoboost F150 makes 375hp and averages 18mpg, even with forged parts, better cooling, and weighing a whole 1000lbs less than the panel van!
the raptor makes like 470hp and is averaging 15 mpg in the real world,. the only BIG difference mechanically for the 3 trucks is in the raptor, the rest is all tune.
@@MrBoom50 id like to see the v8 crowd now with their claim - a larger engine consume less fuel uner load
my maverick is coming in at the end of november. i can`t wait. it took about 9 months to be made and shipped.
Can't wait to see it with a down pipe & intake!
Hey Mr boom that's a great video that you show about putting in the extra lights and stuff I mean top notch and professional I just have a few quick questions for you when you put on the blinker control the lights go yellow yellow and then when they hit the turn signal do they switch them to White or do they go still keep yellow and the other thing question I had for you is are you going to do anything with the fog lights down on the truck today some but the other guys are on the channel you without saying their names they posted that they put them on they look pretty good but I want to see what you can come up with it do you have any plans and one last question how much would the the small one the light bar be if I wanted to put the buy that for me and put that have that shipped up and I put that on my truck so one more time thank you very much and keep those videos coming buddy great
not gonna lie, i was expecting like 7-10lbs. 15-22 is crazy to me for a stock motor. im picking one of these up in the spring so this is good content, keep it up!
Thank you!!
SOLD OUT UNTIL SUMMER BY THEN IT WILL BE THE 2023 MAVERICK
@@MrDICKHEAD28 Only the hybrid is sold out so far. The Ecoboost model is still available for order.
@@flyjum they closed the bank for both over a week ago. -Internet Sales at Ford Dealership
@@flyjum I was looking to order and they said people that pre ordered are still just now getting theirs, if I ordered today I would be looking at late summer so I'm waiting until the 2023 announcement, might have some revisions and a possible awd hybrid by then available.
The pre-military ad (dependant who saw it) seems the rest of the forces caught up w/ the Marine Corps Poolee Program... 1 year prior to boot, we needed to fulfill pretty strenuous PFT's to be eligible, and I'm glad this is getting adopted by a larger body. Now, back to your regularly scheduled programing...
Enjoy your videos! Love the Maverick! Any new 0 to 60 times you can report? Thanks!
It was raining last night, taking it out tonight!
@@MrBoom50 any update!? Inquiring minds are dying to know.
@@philtoscano8629 2x from Chile
Anyone else see the active shutters close on the lower air intake?
Hey bro! I'm just here for the boost 🤣🤣🤣
What's the price tag for the awd, what's the cost for the Dyno test , like to see the comparison vs the Toyota Tacoma
What was used to "tune" the truck? Also its right on the screen that he is using "estimating dynojet numbers" which means he is most likely lowering the roller weight to "adjust" the numbers to be more like a dynojet. MD dyno's are the easist to manipulate.
Pretty awesome numbers. Might even grab the Beefs attention.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
What's that you say?
@@beefsupreme5132 lmfaooooo
Would appear to be making more than advertised. Nice! That, or your Maverick is extremely healthy and happy. I know our 2016 Escape Ecoboost gained power and fuel efficiency after 8k miles.
Advertised is flywheel numbers, if you take parasitic drag/loss into acount from the numbers mine made at the tire stock. Fords numbers are pretty spot on 🤙🤙
due to the lighting im forever convinced this truck needs a dark purple option
🤣🤣🤣 the alto blue color Is gorgeous, albeit it isnt purple
those 20x9 wheels look good.
So how do they know how to set the correct road load for the test? Did they do a coast down test first to develop the equation? Many don’t realize how important that is.
... technology. Lol that's how.
Especially important for a torque based ECU strategy that dictates desired boost in relation to demanded torque model. This is often times why you may see LESS power and less boost on the dyno, and then take it out on the street and be boosting above the levels you thought you had set on the dyno.
I’m honestly waiting to see if Ford does a Maverick R with either the 2.3 turbo ecoboost or maybe a single cab long before version.
Rumor is a Maverick ST is coming next year. Hopefully it's the 2.3 ecoboost. I'll order one day one if that happens!
Get some E30 in that thing , are these twin scroll like escapes or just k03 like an st
@MrBoom_5.0 what are the specs on your 20" wheels? Are you running the same width and offset all the way around? Appreciate the content and the pioneering that you are doing on this new model...especially for those like me who are waiting for their maverick to arrive.
I thought he stated 20 x 8.5 in one of his earlier videos.
Did that Blue insert come standard on the grille? It looks really good. Can you provide some info? Thanks
He modify the grill
@ Mr. Boom how much does it cost to tune .. An do you need a cold air intake & a turbo exhaust
Is this on Stock ECU or are y’all using a Cobb Accessport?
...very cool ! btw, where'd ur front Ford 'oval' emblem go ?
Customizing jt
@@MrBoom50 ...one more...where'd u get that nice blue fitting that goes across the grill ? me ? 'sposed to take delivery on my HPR Lariat somewhere btwn 12/22-12/28. thnx again !
@@steeba1 from me lolol, everything done to any vehicle I post is done by me / bullseyecustomautos.com 🤙🤙
Nice video! My only interest in tuning the Maverick is to up the torque which should translate into higher tow capacity. Based on your #’s, any idea how much that would be?
I'm not an expert but I think what's limiting the tow capacity on the Maverick isn't the power available but the unibody construction and probably braking capacity.
@@pob122 and transmission
@@pob122 it's the tongue weight that's limiting it. If it was sold in Europe, under European legislation it would be able to tow much more (in Europe) because of different tongue weight demands. (Trailer weight is more on center in Europe, in America it's closer to the rear of the vehicle)
@@jensfos Tow ratings are also higher in europe because almost any trailer has surge braking, so vehicles have a standard tow rating for trailers w/o brakes and a much higher one for trailers with brakes. Tongue weight isn't that important as you are supposed to balance your cargo so you won't exceed it. Also a lot of trailers allow to move the axle to different positions.
@@DanielDar13 Yes, but in general, the wheels on American trailers are further backwards, because it is much more stable at higher speeds. In Europe, you can't drive more than 80km/h towing, mostly because of the axle positions, but it's a compromise. Higher speeds and less weight, or more weight and lower speeds.
6:40 Do you know exactly what he did to get the Mav to stay in 4th gear or whatever gear he used to send it?
What tuner are you running? are will these maps be available?
Give this Trucklet every last bean!
Yes sir! That's the plan next week!+
Thats not a default rims correct? What are they
Where did they get the blue trim??
Any updates on performance?
What’s the MPG going to be after all that timing being pulled
Steady averaging 24-25mpg and driving it like I stole it
225whp stock is really good considering its an AWD truck which has a decent amount of driveline loss. Turboback exhaust and a nice intake with a good tune it might make 275whp or so on 93 octane. It would probably outrun a stock 5.0L F150 they run mid 14s or so if I remember right.
My single cab ran 13.2 stock
@@MrBoom50 that's nuts! I don't think I've seen a short box F-150 with the 5.0 up here in Vancouver, Canada. But I've always thought that would be the ultimate sleeper. Kind of the true (although discreet) successor to the lightning. Do you have any videos of that truck?
I'd be surprised if the computer was putting any power to the rear wheels in 4th gear. This is a part time AWD system, putting power to the back when its slipping only.
Yeah, the stock maverick hybrid and Ecoboost both ran 15s, which is very impressive, especially for that hybrid. As someone who's ordering the hybrid, I'm happy to see it has a fair amount of kick to it.
@@KB-bh9hp ecoboost ishigh 14s capable (See my video)
Give 'er the beans!!!
All of em
I still haven’t seen one maverick yet and I’ve really wanted to
They don't last on the dealer lots very long haha
@@MrBoom50 ya that’s for sure I can’t even test drive one yet lol
Stock numbers very similar to gen1 2.0ltrs. Reminds me of early ST days.
Can't speak on those personally. So I'll take your word 🤙
If I had to guess Ford screwed the intercoolers up on these and you'll need better intercooler for any really power stability. Every 2.0ltr I helped build all had extremely small intercoolers.
E30, intake, intercooler, and downpipe should get you max of the stock engine/turbo combination. Im following!
On gen1 on the ST with above mods we were able to get 280-290hp on average and 375-400ftlbs of torque.
@@Jypsu123 we'll see what we can do!
@@MrBoom50 big turbos are always a good thing on 2.0s 😈😈😈
Doesn't it have pedal shifters, so that you can run it manually?
okay! I need help with my Prius! will email you
Did you try to put it in tow/haulass mode might hold
i wanted to throw a throttle body spacer on my hybird is it really needed in terms of power?
Tb spacers do very little
To hold a gear...
Press the "L" button on drive selector after you count the shifts to the gear you want.
Yeah that doesn't work/hold for the full pass on dyno.
I'm waiting for the "it's not a truck" crowd... there were out for the Ridgeline but not the Maverick?
I mean there are plenty of boomers who have made that comment lol. They just get laughed at
It would be interesting to motorswap in a Coyote with the 10 speed into one of these.
Will these tunes leave a footprint on the ECU if flashed then flashed back to stock?
Dealers look at how many times the car has been started after being flashed back to stock. So if a car has 5 starts, obviously it was just flashed back to stock. If it has 300+ starts, that tells them it probably hasn’t been tuned. That’s how they saw my Ford was tuned.
That turbo is way too small unfortunately, but will be fun off the line
It is sized great for torque production
Booyah 👊🏽😁
💪💪💪
BOOM!
🎯🎯🎯🎯
How much does it cost to tune?
To be honest, I not big on Fords besides Thunderbirds, Rangers, and Broncos. I have to say, I would totally own a Maverick if I could get the ecoboost AWD
It's a blast for sure
Wonder is the v8 will fit in that bay, then a whipple popped out the hood
Is there potential in these trucks, what are you looking out of it
I mean. We've done minimal tuning and swapped to e30 and made a solid increase and broken into the 13s in the 1/4. If we can hit the 300whp mark I'd be thrilled.
probably would make significantly more power without the 2 mufflers it has stock
This has got to be in Austin Texas based off how that tuner looks.
The irony of someone with the name "mullet man" talking about how someone looks is astronomical lol
@@MrBoom50 Matt Meredith why you deleting comments? You like to dish it out but can't take it?
@@mulletman210 literally nothing has been deleted.
@@MrBoom50 ok my guy.......
@@mulletman210 I'm sorry you're not competent enough to read comments on youtube, mullet man
Give it more air. Stock intake is like a soda straw.
That's the plan once tune only stuff is done. Then from there parts.
Mr. BOOM my maverick is being built on 12/21. I live in N.W Austin
Heck ya!
We need to meet up I'm getting fx4 2in lift and 30.5 tires area 51 xlt luxury.
did you guys try putting the transmission into L that usually allows you to set a gear limit so it won't go over and it will hold longer
It doesn't work.
Does a coyote fit in the Mav?
Does doing this void your warranty?
Is this truck the hybrid
Imagine the numbers under normal (not desert) temperatures.
Was that paulie shore?
Great looking truck the new Goliath Chevy is a 800hp good ground clearance but nice trucks just a Chevy person like the old gm engines being all are interchangeable easy and simple to work on
Translation anyone? And what does this have to do with the video?
@@adameckhardt115 talking trucks is what
@@bradkaberline5828 This video is about the Ford Maverick. Your comment rambles about a GM engine that nobody is going to own, then into ground clearance, then some jibberish about old GM engines. Try talking about one thing at a time, using punctuation, and staying on point.
@@adameckhardt115 what you a crybaby or what man so fucking what don't read it
@@bradkaberline5828 you got dropped on your head a lot, didnt you?
This tune going to be for sale?
Nothing is certain yet. Will know more in the next couple weeks
So most likely COBB will have a tune soon.if so this awd truck its making more sense for me instead of my mark7 gti..
I couldn't have made it any more clear I this video cobb has absolutely nothing to do with tuning on this truck.
@@MrBoom50 yes sir understood, but they have a good history with the 2.3 ecoboost on the mustang.i don't think the cpu perimeters wouldn't be much different.btw thanks for the vid
Nice
I'm happy with the results!
Video kinda ended 🤔
This is flywheel hp, correct? I refuse to believe it makes advertised flywheel power at the wheel.
Refuse all you want lmfao.
@@MrBoom50 I retract my statement, I thought 220hp was the rated power for the maverick, turns out it's 250. I recently tuned my golf TDI 4motion 150hp and it made 154 eng hp and 101 wheel hp stock. (182,4 eng hp and 125.5 wheel hp tuned, with 421nm or 310.5 ib ft)
Ca 50hp is lost from the flywheel to the wheels on mine, with a similar four wheel drive system, so the fact that you only lost about 30 is impressive, if that Dyno is accurate.
@@MrBoom50 it's my impression though, that dynojets are quite optimistic. My tuner uses a bapro dyno, which in comparison is much more conservative.
@@jensfos....did you even watch the video lol
Why does it say 2021 Ford transit
Gross load, front wheel drive up slick hill. That's the Maverick video I want to see.
th-cam.com/video/_cxGdlL-0OI/w-d-xo.html
there is a rumor that Ford is thinking in coming out with more Maverick models, even talk of a ST model. if it sells good I'm sure they will do it.
There's absolutely 2 more trim models coming! 😈😈
Let's hope so, can you imagine a Maverick st with 300-350 horsepower? I could see them using either the 2.3, or 2.7 ebs. Would be awesome, I'll stick with the hybrid, but I hope Ford makes a more performance oriented maverick to appeal to consumers such as yourself.
Is there any way to ask your tunner if the hybird will be tuneable.?
There is no point to tune the hybrid as it wont result in much if any power gains. Modern cars that are not turbo dont gain much power from tunes unless they have additional mods like full exhaust intake manifolds cams ect. Plus its a hybrid which only runs the gas engine like half the time.
lol, some shop is going to take your money and manipulate the dyno to make you feel good, hah! don't bother tuning the hybrid.
@@flyjum Even with standard aftermarket parts, the gains are extremely small on naturally aspirated. If you get any at all. You'd be talking engine teardown and overhaul. Parts may or may not exist. A hybrid tune might be possible for the electric motor. Finding a shop that is capable of fudging the motors numbers and not create a fire hazard is a different story. I've never heard of one.
I'll wait for the Maverick RAPTOR ST...
So forever because that won't be a thing. Lmao
Its so stupid that every TH-cam creator has to remind you to “hit that like button, subscribe,hit the notification bell. We know we…. Know…
Nah. Comments like the one you posted are stupid though. When 90% of the views on videos are from folks not subscribed.. a little "reminder" goes a long way.
@@MrBoom50 I don’t need a reminder I watch TH-cam videos with the intent to subscribe, if I deem the channel one that I will repetitively watch
@@Journeyman1642 cool. My comment stands.
Dude's got a man bun
Lol
Use set bell 🛎 you can see better results NEXt Time 🤟🏻
Thanks for the tip
Focus ST in truck form
Wait til the aesthetics are finished!
@@MrBoom50 I’m here for it, & I want one! 🤩
What the... everybody knows passengers slow down the truck, har har.
His 👂 😂
Look at me I’m the Subaru WRX now
That's not very honest of you Abe
I like how you are showing maverick info which is seriously lacking on TH-cam. BUT MY GUY…. You have to up you game on video production. You videos are so hard to watch sometimes. It’s like my 16 year old son is making a TH-cam video.
You're more than welcome to purchase a high quality camera and editing software and send it my way 🤙
imagine swapping a 5.0 into this chassis?
Would be such a pain
It would slide all over the place
NO manual mode on the Maverick trans? This is 2021, what a horrible decision on Ford's part.
It's dirt cheap vehicle.... the more shit ford adds the more the price goes up. If it was a horrible decision ford wouldn't be selling this exponentially faster than they can produce them. 99/100 people aren't gunna give two shits if it had manual mode or not
Ummmmm, Ford made this truck for me and a bunch of other people who aren’t trying to read line it at every stop light. Why would I want to pay for paddle shift?
I own an XL ecoboost AWD and they removed mirror adjustment and cruise control to keep the price down. For $25K it’s a fantastic truck.
Stop with the Dynojet Vs Mustang Dyno shit. I have customers bring me tuned vehicles with a Mustang Dyno sheet in hand. Always saying the same thing." It would be higher on a DynoJet". BS, the first I did was three pulls on a DynoJet to compare. Always with in a few either way.
It would depend on the temp's, humidity and atmosphere at the time of testing. Also what correction factor was used. Both are good a Dyno to use for testing and tuning. Any good tuner will be able to work with either one.
Nice truck you have. I think they will be a big sales hit for Ford. Good luck with it.
Tell me you didn't listen without actually telling me you didn't listen
Yes a tuner can work with either one. Dynos ultimately are just a tuning tool. The numbers provided by then should be taken as such. Its not news the mustang dyno loads differently then a dynojet, or even eddy current and superflow dynos
Who is that lady with the mustache?
Lol
Puttn down more 4.0 jeep
Anyone find it weird to tuck your ears under your hat?
Irrelevant, nobody is going to be mixing these fuels in their ford Maverick, this is a value driven daily driver truck, not a race truck.
The only thing irrelevant... is your comment. I get dozens of messages a week asking about tuning. Congrats in being wring.
That Ford chime, is fingernails on a chalkboard to me. For some reason it makes me cringe.
AWD? GREETINGS
Yes sir
great vid! but...your ear being smashed by your hat....
Not to be mean but don't trust a guy with a man bun rule #1