MORE AQP Scenarios
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.พ. 2025
- Stabilized approaches, aborted takeoffs, go-arounds and power-off 180s. These are the things we focused on during this flight on this beautiful Easter Sunday!
On Centerline Podcast: podcasts.apple...
Instagram: @northwest_aeronaut
TikTok: nw_aeronaut
Website: www.northwestaeronautics.com
Music: Epidemic Sound - A Morning in Hindsight - Nebulae
Summer Vibe - Tomas Skyldeberg
Burning Moon - Cushy
So awesome 😎😎😎😎
The addition of the flaps at the end was awesome. Was always taught to use flap only to decend not to extend glides!
Great presentation. Thanks
Thank you, Jake! 🙌🏻
Great video and explanations bud.
This was an awesome video, especially dealing with the takeoff. Abort plan. I’m sad to confess that is something that I really don’t think about. I just figure. I will know what to do when the time comes. I do brief emergency procedures in the event of an engine failure, but never really added an abort plan to the briefing. Will definitely will start doing that now! Thank you for sharing, brother!
Great to hear, Russ! Thanks for watching my man. 🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻
I enjoyed this video very much. I liked keep your eye on the runway.
Good to hear Greg! Thanks for watching!
Very good video!
Thanks Lar-bear :-) 😁
Like it! Never thought of using flaps on a low/short final but was curious how it would work. I will be doing a couple of these exercises tomorrow!
Let me know how it goes!
So very true about high-performance and go around! When I come in to land, I am really far back trim, but on a go around I have to quickly trim forward and not end up in a power on stall. I was just knocking off rust with an instructor this weekend, and I specifically included that note as we were on downwind. “if either of us calls for a go-round, we have got two pair it with trim, trim trim!”
Exactly!🙌🏻🙌🏻
Sounds like you misused the term AQP. And if you're trying to set good examples, broadcast more slowly and intelligibly. The point is not for you to transmit, the point is for other people to understand what you said.
Sorry, not sure what you’re talking about.
@@NorthwestAeronaut When I helped develop AQP 25 years ago or so for the FAA, the idea was that airlines used FOQA data to demonstrate crew performance on the line so that recurrent training intervals could be extended. One pompous and notorious individual has since tried to unilaterally redefine the term AQP. Don't do that.
His name is Ed Cew. He is a male Karen but appropriately named ED. His TH-cam channel started in 2011 has 11 subscribers. He has several videos so absurd that he had to turn commenting off. One has him in a RV-9A taking off and engaging AP at about 10 feet.
I doubt that ED developed AQP for the FAA. AQP was developed by a consortium of airlines (mostly US Air) and was later approved by a congressional act. FAA had little to do with it except to say “y’all find a way to fix this or we are about to pull carrier 121 certificates.”
The idea was to use data in order to identify problem scenarios. But the philosophy pre dated FOQA. It took a lot of time to get FOQA to assist. AQP is a “philosophy” that recognized the fact that we need not spend anymore time in the steep turn academy testing 121 guys based on their ability to perform the all revered steep turn.
AQP says that we identify, recognize and acknowledge certain surprise based scenarios where startle and lack of conditioning could cause an improper response or no response at all.
AQP for GA only takes the best of the 121 philosophies learned and adapts them to GA, without FOQA.
I suspect that ED is a problem for many and this forum may be this guys best hope of achieving any satisfaction. I invite him to let me interview him but I suspect that he lacks the confidence to get up for that.