Enphase vs Tigo | Watch this REAL TEST | Which one is better? Microinverter vs Optimizer

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 มิ.ย. 2024
  • The time has come, to test these two together! Enphase IQ8A Microinverter versus Tigo Power Optimizer + SMA String Inverter! We performed another set of 20+ Tests, with and without shading to determine which one wins the battle!
    Are they really that different?
    What is the cost comparison?
    What do you guys think? Let me know!
    CHECK OUT MY OTHER TESTING VIDEOS:
    REC 400W Vs. Aptos 400W
    • Video
    Shadow Test
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ur1HX...
    The Best Solar Panels
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iMXi...
    The Best Battery 2024
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8yes...
    If you are looking to install a solar system for your home, I truly hope that my videos will become a guide for you. My goal is to educate homeowners on solar and storage with no strings attached, no pressured sales tactics... just by sharing my knowledge and 8+ years of experience in the solar industry. I hope you like enjoy it, and stay for more education to come :)
    ----Contents of this video ----------------------------
    00:00 - Intro
    00:25 - Difference Between the two
    2.33 - Our Testing Set up
    3:36 Test 1-3 No Direct Shade Applied
    6:35 - Test 4 -9 - Direct Sunblock
    15:22 Test 10-11 Diffuse Shade (Chimney)
    17:41 - Test 12 Small Leafs
    19:14 - Comparison Of Total Energy Production
    20:02 - Cost Comparison And Conclusion
    *******************************
    Products I recommend:
    LOW COST BATTERY
    signaturesolar.com/eg4-powerp...
    Signature Solar Has FREE SHIPPING till 2/27, which is huge, since those batteries tend to be expensive to ship!
    signaturesolar.com/?ref=C33oA...
    Check out my Amazon StoreFront for any recommendations ranging from home appliances to portable generators.
    amzn.to/49Zo2U5
    Products I recommend:
    Solar Sense- amzn.to/3ZRF6Xv
    Lower cost Version of Solar Sense, still very good! amzn.to/48S9NzO
    Critter Guard - amzn.to/48PoqUD + Clips amzn.to/3FgwfVJ
    Good and low cost EV Charger:
    amzn.to/48VGgVR (Don't forget to click on the $100-130 coupon) - I have this one personally!
    2nd EV Charger - amzn.to/3QcpNoZ - Used by my clients and very good quality!
    Portable Battery EcoFlow- amzn.to/3PTKvIP
    Good quality Portable Generators:
    Westinghouse: amzn.to/476xMdr
    DuroMax: amzn.to/476xOlz
    Other recommended AMAZON Products:
    www.amazon.com/shop/solargirl...
    Contact me:
    info@solartimeusa.com
    www.solartimeusa.com
    Instagram
    solargirl.dallas
    / solargirl.dallas
    Huge thanks to:
    Pawel Mierzwa - Production
    Mac MIerzwa - Creative/ Content Assistant
    Disclaimer:
    I may earn a small commission for my endorsement or recommendation to products or services linked above, but I wouldn't put them here if I didn't truly recommend them. Your purchase helps support my channel and the videos I make. Thank you :)
    Solar Sense- amzn.to/3ZRF6Xv
    Lower cost Version of Solar Sense, still very good! amzn.to/48S9NzO
    Critter Guard - amzn.to/48PoqUD + Clips amzn.to/3FgwfVJ
    Good and low cost EV Charger:
    amzn.to/48VGgVR (Don't forget to click on the $100-130 coupon) - I have this one personally!
    2nd EV Charger - amzn.to/3QcpNoZ - Used by my clients and very good quality!
    Portable Battery EcoFlow- amzn.to/3PTKvIP
    Good quality Portable Generators:
    Westinghouse: amzn.to/476xMdr
    DuroMax: amzn.to/476xOlz
    Other recommended AMAZON Products:
    www.amazon.com/shop/solargirl...
    Contact me:
    contactme@solartimeusa.com
    www.solartimeusa.com
    / solargirl.dallas
    Disclaimer:
    I may earn a small commission for my endorsement or recommendation to products or services linked above, but I wouldn't put them here if I didn't truly recommend them. Your purchase helps support my channel and the videos I make. Thank you :)
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 651

  • @adams2836
    @adams2836 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    Best solar videos on TH-cam. I love these experiments so much

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Awww! That makes me so motivated to keep doing those tests. Truly, I appreciate the comment!

    • @sparkysho-ze7nm
      @sparkysho-ze7nm 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Indeed hands on results

    • @walwor11
      @walwor11 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I'd like to see this same test but how much battery is charged to a battery backup

  • @johnrogers1423
    @johnrogers1423 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +79

    The huge advantage of optimisers is that the DC power that comes down from the roof can go straight to a DC coupled battery and charge it with no conversion losses. This power is additional to the 10 kW limit of the inverter and thereby allows more than 10kW of power to be used by the house if the panels can provide more than 10 kW. As home DC car chargers are introduced EVs will be able to be charged and avoid two current conversion losses.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Yes! If you have seen my other videos I personally prefer central/ hybrids over anything.
      🙌🏼

    • @Mavisto2
      @Mavisto2 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Unfortunately it's also more dangerous to have all that DC coming straight off the roof.

    • @johnrogers1423
      @johnrogers1423 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      DC has been coming off my roof for the last six years with no issues.

    • @Jimmeh_B
      @Jimmeh_B 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      @@johnrogers1423 It's never an issue until it is.

    • @atabetuatara
      @atabetuatara 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      @@Mavisto2"dangerous" is all about how one manages risk: Clipping, shutoffs, shunts, etc... Unprofessional (whether individual OR "certified" contractor) installation = "Dangerous". Asking EVERY question in depth, even when one thinks one has them all covered is how "Dangerous" is removed from the equation. This is not new tech and the field of managing DC is very mature. It's only when someone decide to be willfully ignorant (ie: lazy about asking) or cut corners on necessary costs that risk becomes high and dangerous becomes real.

  • @user-yi7xr8ku4q
    @user-yi7xr8ku4q 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    I'm an older women who is fascinated with solar. I never trusted data sheets so I really appreciate your testing. Very clear and easy to understand. Thank you so much!

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you so much for watching and leaving a comment. I really appreciate it!

    • @ai6mk897
      @ai6mk897 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      As one who working in the electronics industry as an engineer for over 40 years, I can assure you that a good deal of effort in both characterization and testing in performed on electronic components before they are released for use.
      For reputable companies like Enphase, Togo and SMA, the data sheet that you seem to dispute was developed not by some marketing guy, but by real engineers who sample a significant number of the product, collect and analyze the data under specified conditions and use statistic to summarize the results with MIN/MAX/TYP values. MIN and MAX values are +/- 3 sigma.
      You are at liberty to challenge the results produced in the datasheet but I would urge you to contact the manufacturer if you have an issue with the result or the test method used.

    • @MyUtubeScott
      @MyUtubeScott 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      As an engineer that worked in Industrial automation industry utilizing inverters (VFD) in very hot environment like paper and steel mills I can assure you that electronic equipment is not happy being hot. I'll bet roof temperature in summer could easily get to 120 to 130 degrees. Personally I'll keep my extra cash in the bank and go with high quality string inverter.

    • @gordo8189
      @gordo8189 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Datasheets are the backbone of all electronic design and the key to maximising efficiency and safety. Without accurate data, it's all guesswork. So, the question you should be asking is
      "Do I trust the company producing the datasheet?" a lot of cheap imported stuff makes outrageous & unrealistic performance claims, often promoting hazardous use. The secret is to avoid Amazon products with no vowels in the name and stick with brands you know and trust, even if the cost is higher. Burning down your house can be very expensive and losing your life.. well.. nuff said..

    • @techydude
      @techydude หลายเดือนก่อน

      There isn’t any inherent problem with datasheets, and it’s easy to spot the rare situation where one is inaccurate or even fraudulent. What the tests in this kind of video are achieving is *system level* performance results based on factors that affect the whole system, especially when it’s only 1 panel amongst an array that is somehow compromised. It’s no fault of the datasheet that system-level performance isn’t reflected in them.

  • @mondotv4216
    @mondotv4216 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    A very interseting test was done in Europe over a period of 1 year comparing a string inverter with both optimisers and and microinverters featuring real world typical shading (not heavy shading). The result was that there was so little advantage to either optimisers or micro inverters (like 2 or 3%) that you were better off just making up the difference with an extra panel or 2 which was more cost effective. In a heavily shaded scenario there may be a place for these technologies, but once again, they're expensive. A couple of issues with micro inverters : you lose flexibility that you might have with a DC system. ie - you could directly charge a home battery with a DC -DC coverter rather than going DC - AC - DC and if one des fail in the middle of a panel group it involves getting a technician on the roof, lifting panels and replacing the unit.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes I have read about that test and you are very right, with no much shade, its best to just remove possible points of failure all together.
      I also agree with lack of flexibility if using micros when it comes to future battery retrofit.
      \Thanks for sharing your thoughts and experience on this.

  • @contrarian777
    @contrarian777 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    Keep in mind that Enphase is also taking their AC reading AT THE SOLAR PANEL... whereas the Tigo / SMA reading for AC is at the SMA inverter, presumably a lot closer to the house utility panel... closer to the loads. Each leg of the Enphase is coming down at 120 volts vs 400+ volts DC for the Tigo/SMA system. So it's not inconsequential... could be another 4 or 5% less yield. Lastly, to get a real reading, you should be using a third party meter for both systems, at the point of connection to the loads. Maybe some CTs could do that.

    • @slagmaker6780
      @slagmaker6780 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Enphase is 240V not 120V.

    • @pokechamp003
      @pokechamp003 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The production CT’s on emphases is inside the combiner box.

    • @deyumei7965
      @deyumei7965 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@slagmaker6780 each leg, so 120 times 2

  • @AladimBR
    @AladimBR หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Back in March 2020, I got 3 groups of 4 panels powered by APS microinveters with a small device that looks like a wifi router that reports the power output through wifi / internet. This small device didn’t cost USD 700, it was in the neighborhood of USD 150 if I recall correctly. It didn’t need a central unit, all microinverters were connected directly to my house’s power panel. Each microinverter takes care of 4 panels, so I bought 3, plus cables. I bought the whole system as a turnkey from a small firm led by a real electrical engineer. In comparison to a centralized system which he also quoted, without optimizer, there was a 20-25% difference. Based on the performance criteria, as it was an investment for 25 years, I went with the microinverters. I don’t know what the prices are at the moment (I’m not in US), but I guess adding an optimizer would decrease the difference, and still 2 issues to be addressed that you didn’t mention: electrical safety and future maintenance. Electrical safety: a centralized inverter with 12 panels in series would amount to 600V, before the AC output which is a hazard (in factories, 440V requires specialized technicians, individual protection equipment, etc), while the microinventers are dealing with 50V in parallel before the AC output, and the 3 inverters are independent from each other. Maintenance: although panels have 25 year warranty, the inventers probably have 5 years (perhaps 10 in some cases). If a centralized inverter goes down after the warranty ends, you have to pay 100% of the system price to replace it, and during that time you get 0% power from the solar panels. In comparison, with microinventers, if one goes down, in my case I will pay 33% to replace it, and still will have 66% of the power. Those are important aspects to consider. My system will have paid back itself sometime this year, I’m paying minimun consuption for my electricity provider, with still 2000 kwh in credit. Water heating included, I moved from gas to electrical. Last point, scalability: I added 4 more panels last year with same type of microinverter, no changes in installation besides adding the new group to the app control. I don’t know how it works to add panels with a centralized system. I did this because I got an EV as a company car, and now I save also on fuel. Best investment in my life, no taxes for the savings (I pay less tax now I my utilities are reduced), and continuous cash flow that will help a lot when I retire.

  • @robertarroyo7575
    @robertarroyo7575 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Great video and terrific testing, your customers are very blessed to have an awesome business owner that actually has tested the systems and can recommend the best solution for their needs, keep up the great work you are doing

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you so much for saying that. I really really appreciate it. :)

  • @rteune2416
    @rteune2416 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks for all the effort you are putting into your videos to make it digestible. These tests could be boring but you make it very entertaining! Thanks again Martyna.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I am so happy you said that. Thank you so very much for the kind words. I was honestly worried they will be so boring. Next time maybe add a joke here or there or funny facts or sth. :)

  • @adon8672
    @adon8672 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Thanks for this highly informative and straight to the point video. Please keep them coming. Nice athletic moves too.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Thank you for watching and also leaving a comment. People don’t realize how helpful it is with the TH-cam Gods 😂🤍

  • @CL-nj3zs
    @CL-nj3zs 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Been waiting for part 2 of your test. Thanks.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So glad! Thank you for leaving a comment 🙌🏼

  • @Texacate
    @Texacate 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Finally, REAL shade testing! (Like from a nearby tree, chimney, or building, etc.) that STILL allows indirect sky light to reach the shaded cells. Guessing this is a first on all of youtube... Well done.\

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you so so much! 🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼

    • @robertsmith2956
      @robertsmith2956 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      EEVBlog got hammered by the coax cable from his roof antenna. in the afternoon sun.

    • @markmuir7338
      @markmuir7338 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@robertsmith2956EEVblog’s shading issue was without optimizers. That’s exactly the problem optimizers try to solve - and judging by the results in this video, it seems to do it very well

  • @mariarayappan6576
    @mariarayappan6576 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Looks awesome to see testing videos like this. Thanks for making videos on solar.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you so much for taking the time to leave a comment, it means so much to me! :)

  • @ScottyDMcom
    @ScottyDMcom 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The thing that strikes me as weird, is the changing relative outputs between the two test setups (considering only the unshaded panels). And the changing efficiency of the string inverter. At first I thought it might be temperature. That is, as the optimizers warm up they produce less, but later they were back to beating the microinverters. And at one point the string inverter was 95% efficient, and the very next test it dropped to 84%, but later bounced back to 93%.
    I wondered what sort of load you used, and concluded the simplest and most accurate would be to simply dump all your power to the grid. It doesn't matter if you're dumping 1KW or 3KW (per test setup), the grid voltage should hardly change. So it really comes down to how much the inverter (micro or string) _wants_ to dump onto the grid. Which is a little like an MPPT circuit hunting for the optimal mix of voltage and current to maximize output power of the panel. In the inverter''s case, they might output 239 VAC, 240 VAC, or 241 VAC, and that 0.4% change in target voltage can make a much bigger difference in output current (maybe as much as 5%), which could totally account for the ping-pong performance difference between the two test setups.
    So perhaps the overall power output difference (because it's so close) is irrelevant. The interesting result is the effect of shading panels on both systems, which also seems close enough to be largely irrelevant. The conclusion I come to is, buy which ever one you want. They're both good.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hey Scotty, so true and I was also very suprised by the change in the DC to AC conversion. I so wish we could see the DC input of the microinverters, and compare to the AC output. Most major inverters whether string or micro, are similar in the efficiency so its very interesting to see those difference.
      Just like you concluded, at the end of the day, the homeowner has to decide, since they are both very good! :) Thanks so much for leaving a comment!!! :)

  • @ffter888
    @ffter888 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Would be interesting to see individual output of each one of them under cold and hot conditions.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Good idea! Need to test this winter a lot and then we can compare with summer 100+ temps!

  • @MoeinEsther
    @MoeinEsther 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Just want to say THANK YOU for ALL THIS WORK , amazing testing.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  9 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      THANK YOU for being so kind and leaving a comment!

  • @sirjohng1
    @sirjohng1 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Oh what a change to see such a good, simple and well expressed trial. Thank you.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you so much for being so kind and leaving a positive comment ! :) I so appreciate it!

  • @9jmorrison
    @9jmorrison 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think these tests, and analysis were excellent. thank you so much, I would give you all an A+

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I so appreciate you leaving a comment! Thanks again!

  • @dickthompson8018
    @dickthompson8018 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Great testing, thanks for doing this. As an early adopter of Enphase, I really like seeing the data. If I was going to do a system today, I would go with tigo and SolArk, with at least a small battery to allow solar to be used in grid downtime. Thanks again for your great videos!

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for sharing! How long ago did you go solar?;) if you don’t mind me asking?

    • @dickthompson8018
      @dickthompson8018 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@solartimeusa I went solar in 2010, with 18 solar world 245 W, mono panels and Enphase D-380 micro. All the D-380s have been replaced under warranty in the last 5 years. Enphase was very good with warranty, I replaced myself, so no cost to me. Replacement micro look like IQ-7, but de-rated to 190, with firmware that is compatible with my Early Envoy.

    • @robertm2744
      @robertm2744 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@dickthompson8018 My story is almost the same as yours except my first array was installed in 2012 using M215 micros and I have replaced 4 of those. Like you I like what Sol Ark has to offer. If I add storage I will likely go with Sol Ark and possibly Togo

  • @Private-GtngxNMBKvYzXyPq
    @Private-GtngxNMBKvYzXyPq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was very enlightening. Thank you.

  • @wotblitz4071
    @wotblitz4071 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Very informative and helpful video! Thank you so much!

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You are so welcome! :)

  • @harryniedecken5321
    @harryniedecken5321 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for the testing. Most of my experience is with solar panels on conversion vans so relatively smaller systems. I didn't realize that optimizers could help so much with shading challenges

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you for leaving a comment, and sharing. :) Appreciate it so much!

  • @torahislife
    @torahislife 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good explanation. Appreciate your practical and evidence based approach. Thank you!

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad it was helpful and thank you for taking the time to leave a comment. So appreciated!

  • @computerbob06
    @computerbob06 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A brilliant test and great, very clear video with clear easy to understand graphics, thank you!
    I have an East/West roof and will fit panels in each direction but a sizeable chimney in the middle to one side (Victorian house) so will have varying amounts of shading over different panels throughout the day!
    Very interesting!

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I am so so glad!!! Thank you for leaving a comment!

  • @tortoise62
    @tortoise62 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I thought you did a wonderful job! I was also pleasantly surprised that you compared the cost of both systems in the end as well. It appears that the greater efficiency of EnPhase won't recoup the extra cost over the life of the system.

  • @Superiorsolarconsulting
    @Superiorsolarconsulting 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    To me the value of Enphase isn’t a slightly better or worse production. It has to do with no single point of failure and proven reliability no other inverter option can touch. Great video!!!!

    • @Superiorsolarconsulting
      @Superiorsolarconsulting 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@macmierzwa5361 the 5 year warranty is because of the envoy potentially having compatibility issues in the future and Enphase not wanting to be on the hook to create a whole new component to communicate with future wifi or cell signals we currently don’t use. The other aspect is simply the combiner box which you can use a generic sub panel instead if you’d like. When the was the last time a normal electrical panel failed on your watch? I’ve literally never seen an Enphase combiner fail in 7 years

    • @Qosmio1955
      @Qosmio1955 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      As long as a micro-inverter in the centre of an array doesn't fail and you have to remove many panels to get to the dead inverter. It happened to our neighbour. Absolutely dead unlucky, but it goes to show that whatever can go wrong, will go wrong, with the most inconvenience possible...

    • @meko1896
      @meko1896 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Had Enphase inverters installed in 2014. Currently running with 5 dead inverters. Even though Enphase will warranty the inverters, the cost of removing my panel array to identify which ones have failed is simply not worth it. I had 3 systems installed at the same time, 28 panel systems, on 3 different houses. All 3 systems have experienced similar issues. I was gun-ho on Enphase in the beginning, not so much now.

    • @Superiorsolarconsulting
      @Superiorsolarconsulting 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@meko1896removing the panel is like a 3 minute job for a contractor. They could be in n out within an hour and 5 new micros installed

    • @Nahsorry
      @Nahsorry 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@meko1896hi, I’m not very experienced. Just wondering why you’re not able to identify the failed micro inverter in the monitoring app?

  • @Ulbre
    @Ulbre 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It would be nice to also have seen a full day of non-shaded production. I get the feeling the micro inverter may have performed at least 10% better over the course of the entire day. But i think you are right in your summary in that it really depends on your situation and needs.

  • @gordo8189
    @gordo8189 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A thorough, informative video, thank-you Martyna.. Reading about the effects of partially obscuring panels and the effect this has on the different inverter configurations is interesting, academically, but seeing it done helps cement the ideas at play. Plus, your cartwheel was an unexpected little treat.. Keep up the good work..

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you so much for leaving your thoughts and sharing. I am sure I could have done this test in different ways or speak about it differently but I hope its a step into the right direction for good product testing. :)

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you so much for leaving your thoughts and sharing. I am sure I could have done this test in different ways or speak about it differently but I hope its a step into the right direction for good product testing. :)

  • @oso13bravo
    @oso13bravo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Another great video! It would be important to include a failure rate analysis of both products. This is a big factor for most installers. I worked for Fronius and now work as an Application Engineer for Enphase. At Fronius, we paired the inverter with a Tigo optimizer, and the feedback from installers said the failure rate was higher than other products they installed. Working at Enphase, I don't really hear about any major issues. Once in a blue moon, I do hear that a surge from the grid can cause the microinverters to fail. I would like to get your feedback. I love your videos, keep them coming.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thank you for sharing! Yes I definitely want to do a video on failure points. It would be interesting to see, especially with Hoymiles making a big entrance.... :D I would go Enphase over any micro anyday, but personally I am more of a string inverter type a gal :D
      Thank you for sharing your history in Solar

  • @Sadowsky46
    @Sadowsky46 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great and methodical testing! It looks though that at 10 AM there was still a bit of shading from the building behind on the Enphase side.

  • @SPdesi1
    @SPdesi1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you Martyna for describing by conducting different tests and arriving at concrete results to decide which may work best in a given situation. I will watch this clip again and again and highly recommend to individual(s) who may have doubts in their heads on deciding which system to go for....By the way that athletic flip was hilarious.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you so much for leaving a comment, I am so glad the test was helpful! :)

  • @guidospaini7339
    @guidospaini7339 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Very conclusive, and illustrating test.
    Thanks.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Thank you so much for watching!

  • @tscoff
    @tscoff 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That’s fascinating! Thank you.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      THANK YOU for being so kind and leaving a comment! :)

  • @atabetuatara
    @atabetuatara 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent comparison video. Easy enough to understand.
    As an electrical engineer, I REALLY appreciate real world testing. This is first time I've seen any comparison video for solar panels. While I would have loved to see better numerical comparison when comparing AC to DC output for individual panels versus an entire set of panels, the point is not difficult to glean.
    If you haven't already planned it, I'd love to see the same comparison for batteries; that would be awesome!

    • @rickdiego5
      @rickdiego5 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Check out neo Volta. I had the 24K installed and it runs my whole house except for the central AC which I keep on the grid because it sucks too much electricity anyway. But I installed 110 volt mini split if there ever was an outage on the grid.

  • @rkan2
    @rkan2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cool video with a good effort on testing! Could you test panel mounting orientations? I am especially interested in northern hemisphere winter conditions and the vertical mounting style like on a wall.

  • @nareshgolla
    @nareshgolla 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video and the testing was very intensive. I have the Solar Edge optimizers installed just a couple of days as I realised later but I think overall with a power production guarantee for 25 years from almost every solar company, it may not be a big difference.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I will be testing SolarEdge against Microinverters soon, but you are correct! The difference is so small, I really don't think you should regret anything, and especially if shading is not even an issue. You should feel good! I like customer service with SolarEdge, they make it really easy to replace faulty units, and are pretty quick about it too!

  • @wagnerfontes2
    @wagnerfontes2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the great video!
    You mention another video comparing optimizers vs non-optimizer systems, but I could not find it...

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hi so sorry let me see if I can share the link here, its for a video about shading on my channel.
      th-cam.com/video/Ur1HXsx09Jw/w-d-xo.html
      Title: REAL Shading TEST ! How much does Shade kill your Solar Production?

  • @gobfranklin6759
    @gobfranklin6759 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the analysis 😊

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you so much for the comment :)

  • @PierreAlainMaire
    @PierreAlainMaire 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very interesting, well done tests ! It looks like the inverter (on the optimizers setup) has huge losses when power is high, what do you think ? Or is energy lost in the cables ?

  • @Electronzap
    @Electronzap 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Nice tests, and good info.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you so much for leaving a comment! I’m glad you liked the video! :)

  • @randynethery
    @randynethery 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Love your experiments and am looking forward to the other testing mentioned in your replies. I've DIY installed two 4.5k systems on my south facing roof with minor shading. One system is a SolarEdge 3800 and the other is Enphase IQ8m's. Surprised that the Solar Edge has consistently out performed Enphase day in and day out by a solid 5%. It will be interesting to see how your test goes.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Oh wow! Thank you so much for sharing!
      This is very interesting! What type of panels did you use if you don’t mind me asking?
      The great thing is that this truly depends on so many factors!
      Thank you again for sharing!

    • @randynethery
      @randynethery 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The SolarEdge install has (14) Canadian Solar cs1k325's. It's almost 5 years old . The Enphase install uses (8) rec365aa's and (4) rec395aa's, it's not quite 2 years old. To tell you the truth, the reason I have this setup is that I was in the process of completely converting to Enphase, but with the performance issue with Enphase I've decided to go a different direction. I'll be adding whole house battery backup and V2H EV charging in the next year or so and right now I'm leaning towards a Sol-Ark 15 with their new optimizers - we'll see.@@solartimeusa

  • @MOROKO
    @MOROKO หลายเดือนก่อน

    Super test Pani Martyno!

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bardzo dziekuje!!! :)

  • @stevew3978
    @stevew3978 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Fantastic video. My system was installed in 2016. There was no such comparison video back in 2016 when I was choosing between Tigo and Enphase. I ended up choosing Tigo and, seeing the results of the video now, I think I made the right choice. I currently own stocks in both companies.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for sharing and yes I do too! :) Tough times in solar industry now but it will come back up!

  • @MasterCommandCEO
    @MasterCommandCEO 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    WONDERFUL TEST!
    DEF EARNED THE SUBSCRIBE!

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      YAAAY! :) Thank you !!! I hope I will not disappoint.

  • @michaelball3140
    @michaelball3140 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Your test solidified my choice for SolarEdge Power Optimizers and the string inverter. The difference in cost compared to my neighbors who went with Enphase and micro-inverters is so drastically different I try not to tell them my actual cost....

  • @user-fw2yo5hk8y
    @user-fw2yo5hk8y 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Super Vergleich! Danke!

  • @nabhansanusi7063
    @nabhansanusi7063 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hi... From Malaysia with love 😀 Thanks for the great effort.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you too! :)!!!!!

  • @terryrodbourn2793
    @terryrodbourn2793 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As a avid tenter the most important is battery tech so or more videos you test between using different battery tech to see what is the best/and cheapest batteries to use in their systems!

  • @retogfeller
    @retogfeller 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video!
    I had no idea about solar in 2015!
    I got a system with
    SMA Tripower AND TIGO Optimizers MM-2ES75 for ALL modules.
    I am so happy since 2015 - NOR the SMA - NOR any Tigo had any fault till current time and contine to work geat!

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you so so much for sharing!!! I am so so happy you are happy!!

  • @Kirmo13
    @Kirmo13 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Such a good test! Thanks for sharing for free :)

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are so welcome! Thank you so much for the kind comment 🤞🏻🙏

  • @craigescapeddetroit5198
    @craigescapeddetroit5198 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bravo.
    Excellent analysis and straight to the point.
    From power output to MONEY output.
    I just SUBSCRIBED to your channel.

  • @ncaatrackstar
    @ncaatrackstar 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great job with the comparisons!

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you so much :)

  • @user-ot8fv4rp1u
    @user-ot8fv4rp1u 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you provide a link to the first video you referenced comparing the shading effects of Optimizers vs String Inverters?
    Can't seem to find it!

  • @othoapproto9603
    @othoapproto9603 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thanks for doing and sharing!

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Thank you for being cool and leaving a comment!

  • @GaryDoesSolar
    @GaryDoesSolar 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    This (and also your last video on shading tests) is just fantastic - thank you! 😃

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thank YOU Gary! Your TH-cam is so inspiring as well! Thank you for all the work you do.

  • @Cotronixco
    @Cotronixco 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    In my case I simply paralleled the panels in the attic and ran heavy DC to a central inverter. Less trouble, works great.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for sharing and leaving a comment! :)

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for sharing and leaving a comment! :)

  • @mikeazeka1753
    @mikeazeka1753 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good video! Test 11 is more relevant than the other tests which used leaves and cardboard. In real life, panels never see full shading that the cardboard presents, diffused shading from chimneys, vent pipes, trees, and structures is what we actually experience.

  • @MrArashkha
    @MrArashkha 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video. Would love to have a searchable title such as Tigo vs. Enphase, or something to make it easier to find based on your other video. Was looking for this for a long time.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you so much for giving that idea, just updated it. Thank you again! :)

  • @harism5589
    @harism5589 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lots of efforts to put together two solar inverter systems and carry on the experiments. Thank you for making this comparison video. Also conclusion is also very clear. If during a day shadows come and go on the solar panels, go with micro inverters. If there are no shadow issues, go with one central one inverter and save some money on the equipment. Also get more power in caparison, since no shadow issues.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you so much for leaving the comment :) I so appreciate it!!!

  • @allen4959
    @allen4959 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    First thing is I’m new to your channel and ❤the content. My question is : If the panels are facing south, going from left to right wouldn’t the Enphase side get sun first? Would it be the same results if you set the tigo side in front of the Enphase ( far enough in front without shading?). Just curious thank you

  • @serraios1989
    @serraios1989 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thank you for this brilliant experiment. I have Enphase and I’m happy with the microinverters, but the cost was more.
    Would be great to see how the iq8+ compares to the iq8a on the 400w panels

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thats a future test for sure! Thank you so much for leaving a comment and hopefully you will stay for future videos/tests :)!!!
      Happy producing!

    • @LarryRichelli
      @LarryRichelli 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@solartimeusa This was 3 months ago and still no test between the iq8+ and iq8a. I don't know the difference but I think that the plus can be used with more powerful panels.

  • @zeebeepape1
    @zeebeepape1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great test. Just curious about the efficiency curve of the string inverter. I know that generally string inverter efficiency increases when running closer to maximum capacity. I didn't see you mention the size of the SMA, but if it was a 5 or 6kW then might there be slightly better performance if utilisation was closer to 100%?

  • @shanonedser1
    @shanonedser1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi Martyna,
    I really like your channel and I appreciate the trouble you go to in building your experiments and I find your information to be really valuable as a technical person.
    I’m a mature age Electrical Engineering Student and Inventor from Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.🇦🇺 🏖️
    So I’m in the ‘Sunshine State’ like Florida or Texas although we do still get some very cloudy days.
    I’m planning on specialising in renewable energy as well as electrical safety devices.
    My question is how much does the VOC string voltage affect power output on rainy cloudy days as that’s when my current system struggles to get the battery bank charged in addition to supplying the loads.
    I started with a 3KW PV array and I now have a 6KW PV array (12x Trina 510W) which performs far better than previously.
    My array is coupled to a Fronius Primo 5.0-1 PV inverter which is then AC coupled to a Victron Multiplus 2 5KW inverter/charger and a 10KW Pylontech lithium battery bank (3x US3000C LiFePo4 48V)
    My PV Inverter has a max VOC of 1000V and my current PV array has a VOC of ~600V.
    I’m considering adding another 6 panels to give me a VOC of ~900V.
    Given my mppt range is 240-800V
    I gather that increasing my VOC string voltage will not just increase my output by a third but maybe somewhat more than that by hopefully getting into the mppt range even in really poor conditions.
    Is that correct?
    Do you know of a method of calculating this?
    Also as I’m an inventor do you happen to know of any product on the market that protects solar panels from hail?
    I’m looking at developing an invention that protects solar panels from large and giant hail so I’m trying to see if there is any competition but I really can’t find a single one.
    We get some really crazy storms here so that’s why I started looking into it.
    Have a really great day.
    Regards,
    Shanon.

  • @keithpvbatt2040
    @keithpvbatt2040 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great testing, it's likely the most truthfull in the industry keep up with the good work. I have a strong belief in no shading for a roof and a simple layout string inverter all the way. If the roof is chopped up or shaded micro is worth it, and we use AP systems. Finally if it is a ground mounted we only use bifacial panels with string inverters and no MLPE at all.

  • @HS-gx4qx
    @HS-gx4qx 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fantastic work - thx!

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you so much, and thank you for leaving a comment as well :)

  • @lh6433
    @lh6433 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Maybe a bit different but would like to Tigo vs Victron energy MPPT controller video.

  • @romon99-kx8tx
    @romon99-kx8tx 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hello! Thanks a lot for your video, really well-done!
    I am performing some measurements for my studies, and I am for the moment finding some results I didn't expect. Comparing two systems, one with micro-inverters (Enphase) and another one with power optimizers (Huawei) for a whole year, what I am finding some differences depending on the seasons.
    In particular, micro-inverters seems to perform up to 15-18% better in summer, while power optimizers perform up to 30% better during the winter months. This is surprising me, since from a theoretical point of view I would expect way less difference and maybe an opposite situation.
    Do you (or someone else) have maybe some possible explanation to this?
    Is it something you are able to see to in the measurements you are performing?
    Thanks!

  • @jpluddite
    @jpluddite 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love your tests! In your replies to some of the comments for this video, you hinted at two upcoming tests: (1) solaredge vs enphase, and (2) comparison of production of solar panel brands. Do you have an estimate for when those videos will appear? Thanks again.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just waiting for a bit better weather, we have had a pretty cold winter week in Texas :D Please dont loose patience with me!

  • @johnmcqueen4302
    @johnmcqueen4302 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Really nice video, but you didn’t finish the cost vs net gain…if Enphase gives you 3% more - these “savings” offset the extra cost and your pay back time alters? Keep the trials going nice to see real world examples rather than the usual marketing blurb…..

  • @EthosAtheos
    @EthosAtheos 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is there a difference between them when it comes to hauling the power back to your battery room? It seems to me the micro inverters might save you some money in cable due to the higher voltage allowing a smaller cable.

  • @brentfrank7012
    @brentfrank7012 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Great video Martyna, question : if I’ve got a few panels partially shaded each day. Can I add optimizers to just those few panels and improve my entire array’s performance?

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You sure can. Those can work independently, very popular solution in EU. Are you located in USA or other country ?

  • @marionstoreybiddle8562
    @marionstoreybiddle8562 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the video - great testing. I do have a couple comments, though. It looks like there may have been some shading that wasn't yours. In the morning the values on the unshaded panels tended to be higher on the Tigo side and in the afternoon they were higher on the enphase side. That seemed to impact your numbers. The panel next to the panel with the small chimney shadow was lower when you were testing, which you noted, but this indicated a shadow from another source (like a cloud), because in the next test, that same panel next to the small chimney shaded panel was back to the value for the unshaded panels. Obviously this is hard to control for, but it just means these tests are approximate at best. Again, though, I do think this is great info.

  • @thoraero
    @thoraero หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great content. Thank you

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  หลายเดือนก่อน

      THANK YOU!!!:)

  • @wrpaulw2063
    @wrpaulw2063 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very interesting, the optimizers seemed to to better at lesser sun levels. A lot of new homes in Australia seem to be long and narrow in profile with often means you may only have east and west faces available for solar. To compensate the temptation is to load up both east and west faces with solar panels meaning at any one time one face or the other will be very sub-optimal in output.
    My question is in such a setup, shading issues aside which solution ( optimizers/microinverters) would deliver a better combined yield over the course of a full day?

  • @markharding8480
    @markharding8480 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love your channel!!!

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So glad, thank you so so much for leaving a comment! :)

  • @NacNacMOTT
    @NacNacMOTT 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hi, thank you for another great video. I like very much your approach and at min 19:49 you show that Enphase has produce 3 to 3.5% energy. What is also interesting to take into account is when you have battery storage. Enphase will have more current conversion than if you have a DC coupled with Tigo. At the end it would be interesting to see what you get out of your batteries.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That battery storage thinking peaks my interest and i would love to test it like that to see if the results would change!

    • @NacNacMOTT
      @NacNacMOTT 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@solartimeusa looking forward to this video :) Keep up the good work

    • @Blazer-fp8fo
      @Blazer-fp8fo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This is exactly what I am wondering. Especially for an off grid system that is mostly DC anyway, avoiding those conversion loss's is a big thing.
      The one time I see the micro inverters as a plus is a grid tie system that does not have battery storage.
      From all of the research I have done, any system with battery storage in it is better off with optimizers over micro inverters. DC-DC charging efficiency is almost always higher than AC-DC.
      With solar getting more "common" I hope to see more DC appliance options. There are already DC refrigerators/freezers available, as well as ceiling fans.
      POE systems are ripe for running off of a 48V solar battery system. That can currently cover lighting, some TV's, a lot of security systems, as well as ports for all sorts of usb devices.
      Large loads are really the only problem area right now for taking a house completely DC.
      I am also very interested in building sciences, and believe we have the technology, RIGHT NOW, to be fully capable of building houses that are self sufficient from an energy standpoint, at a reasonable cost compared to current minimum code compliant standards. The biggest problem is convincing people to NOT do the same old thing, but instead do it better.

    • @JaylanYilmaz
      @JaylanYilmaz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      having 10kw solar edge with optimiser , plus dc SolarEdge battery installed next week
      To achieve this exact goal

  • @marklefler4007
    @marklefler4007 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great experiments. Thanks! My understanding is Microinverters have a 25 year warrenty, and regular string inverters a 10 year warrenty. Figuring in the need to have to replace the string inverter at least once or twice over the 25 year warrenty on most solar panels (plus installation of it), and the roughly 3% more production of microinverters, the microinverters seem the most long term cost effective solution.

  • @chefboyrdee1
    @chefboyrdee1 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    epic comparison thanks.

  • @StuffPeterLikes
    @StuffPeterLikes 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A very interesting comparison, thank you.
    It is worth noting that the Enphase system does not have a single point of failure. A dead Enphase inverter will stop production for one panel while a dead optimiser or central inverter will take down the whole system.
    A comparison of cabling cost from the roof the central inverter/combiner box would be interesting. AC cabling is mass produced while high voltage DC cabling is more specialised.
    It would be interesting to compare the AC power reported by the systems with a 3rd party meter.

  • @hank-kal
    @hank-kal 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    One more aspect to discuss and possibly test is the power loss difference between DC and AC power running along possibly long wires, from one side of the roof to the (SMA or SolarEdge) String Inverter (for DC) or the IQ Combiner box (for AC).
    Why understanding is that running DC power along 50-100 feet of wire might incur sugnificent power losses, which is not the case with AC power, which makes the conversion from DC to AC closer to the module a better choice.
    What are your thoughts about that?
    This field test didn't really test that, since all the wires are very short, which will not be the case in real-life applications, when the panels are spread along the roof area(s) running long wires from the Tigo (or SolarEdge) Power-Optimizers and Enphase Micro-Inverters.

  • @NeptuneAlpheccaChild
    @NeptuneAlpheccaChild 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thanks so much for confirming my hunch !!!! i've got a 70ft white pine shadow that transits my site

  • @charleshelvey577
    @charleshelvey577 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the informative video. My first thought was to say that a great deal of difference would be seen if you have to place your panel array further from your house. For the string system you would either have to run expensive wire to carry the DC to the house inverter or you would suffer loss. The Microinverters would be much less susceptible to loss since AC can travel further on thinner wire without as much loss (which is why our grid is AC). Your testing of both arrays being adjacent to your building eliminated this from the equation. In my case the array will be about 100 feet from the house.

  • @gundelfish
    @gundelfish 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thx a lot for testing the architecture of the panels by shading them. As one can see the diodes are working as intended.
    Simple question: what's going to fail most likely, the panel or the electronics?
    Hence, simple rule, do not build an electronic box per panel on the roof!

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      EXACTLY! Thanks for that comment!

  • @JurassicJenkins
    @JurassicJenkins 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    21:15 - New sub here, I think you did a great job explaining these two systems. Very well done and fun! Thank you 😊

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Aww! Thank you so much!

  • @adamiq
    @adamiq 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Spoko test. Wezmę go pod uwagę. Właśnie przymierzam się do małego systemu. Dziękuję.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Bardzo prosze, dziekuje za komentarz i pozdrawiam! :)

  • @Leroi2x
    @Leroi2x 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    good test , hope to see more

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Definitely working on new tests to come out this summer!

  • @zmarko
    @zmarko 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Very interesting test & video.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you! I appreciate you leaving a comment, its so helpful with TH-cam algorithm. :)!!!

  • @donwarren76
    @donwarren76 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Your testing is easy to follow and understand. I would like to have seen a no shade at all daily total

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Thank you so much! I will be doing lots more testing soon. :)

  • @nilomaia4851
    @nilomaia4851 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And adding a suggestion: you should test one shading condition at time.
    The way you did you'll always have a dominant condition that will have the biggest impact.
    As we cannot compare directly DC vs AC, it's hard to understand the final AC output result.

  • @AndyM...
    @AndyM... 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hey Martyna, you're a natural in front of the camera, I really like these tests, and I don't think you can beat a basic string inverter without optimisers for simplicity, you may lose a tiny bit of production, but for me the less electronics up there the better. PS You can do cartwheels any time you like LOL !!!

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hey Andy, Thank you so much for leaving a comment, I really really appreciate any support! And I am 100% on the same page as you as far as the string inverter goes! :)

  • @perper2117
    @perper2117 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The shadow test video link in description is broken and I couldn’t find it in your channel. Where can I see the shadow test for string inverter without optimizers?

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      See if this link helps:
      th-cam.com/video/Ur1HXsx09Jw/w-d-xo.html
      Also you can search this title:
      REAL Shading TEST ! How much does Shade kill your Solar Production? I Optimizers Tigo SolarEdge
      Please let me know if it works... :)

  • @bluesolarmx
    @bluesolarmx 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great test!

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for leaving a comment! Really appreciate it 🙏

  • @itekani
    @itekani 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very interesting. I guess there is a crossover point where the Enphase may be cheaper, since you have a big central box in the string inverter case. I'm not a fan of optimizers because of the added complexity and cost, but microinverters add to the benefits of optimizers by removing the amount of hvdc cables routed around the house, and they have excellent warranty too.

  • @garyjones101
    @garyjones101 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    REALLY helpful video! If you are lucky enough to have a long South facing roof with no shading, would a string invertor system without power optimizers be an effective system, or is there a reason to still include them? THANKS!

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Not really unless you just want to pay extra for panel level monitoring. Also if you have to have rapid shutdown in your area, then you might be able to just get The tigo Shut down devices instead of optimizers. COuld save some money there was well.

    • @garyjones101
      @garyjones101 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@solartimeusa Interesting! Thanks!

  • @sharperminds4315
    @sharperminds4315 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We have 48x400 W panels on our roof. Feeding into a Sol-Ark 15kW unit. We have not gone with any optimizers since the panels are mostly on the second story roof and unshaded by trees. That being said, one string of eight is often shaded by a chimney stack, blocking its production for much of the day. It may be better to move a portion of those panels to the adjacent rough surface to eliminate the chimney shading. That being said, we still produce over 15 KW when the sun is mostly overhead. Enough to meet our needs by far. I think one also has to look at the additional failure points by adding an optimizer to each panel. Pros and cons. Good video.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hey! Thank you for sharing your system set up, and yeah you are very right, avoiding those extra points of failure is a good way to go. If you are happy with your system output, that's what matters. anyone can always say:" It COULD be better. BUT its great as is and you're happy with it. :)
      I love Sol-Arks!

  • @willemvanoorschot5507
    @willemvanoorschot5507 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great comparison! I missed the issue of fire hazard. Sola panels cause fires sometimes. I suspect that the lower voltage of enphase could lessen this risk? And do the Tigo have the same lifespan? Normal converters live much shorter than microinverters. To me that is important too. We have microconverters since about 2011, more output than expected and not one problem.

  • @FutureSystem738
    @FutureSystem738 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks -interesting. We have a number of different orientations to deal with, which might favour Enphase?

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Could for sure, it really depend son the set up. But I am not sure how long enphase will be a big name in the game considering tesla Powerwall 3 is now a hybrid.

  • @user-sy7co9mi2z
    @user-sy7co9mi2z หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hi Martyna, I have a video idea for you. From my understanding solar panels advertised performance is based on lab conditions (25C air temp, 1C panel surface temp). This is completely unrealistic and not related to the real world. Panels advertise a coefficient which says how much they theoretically decrease in performance as temp rises, but what does it look like in the real world? If it’s a 95 degree day and the panel is 130 degrees in the full sun, how well will it really perform? You’ve looked at shading etc before but this is even more important. It’s every second of every day. Panels are almost never at lab conditions. So how much will we really get out of them? Thanks.

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      YES !! I am working on a test like that for sure! COming soon! :) Thank you so much for the idea.

  • @lancej2718
    @lancej2718 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very good testing and thanks for the effort. I would have to agree with the commenters that note that the most reliable system is string inverters with no electronics on the roof. There are some rooftops that just simply aren’t worth installing solar on if there is too much shading. I’m a big believer of the fewest points of failure being the best method to creating a reliable system with a good return on investment. The big thing is that each string of solar panels must have a separate MPPT channel. Keep in mind that a single solar panel is simply a string of solar cells, a string of solar panels is just a longer string of solar cells.
    I think there is one important factor that has been overlooked, and that is data lag on portals. I have seen that often where in fact, it makes comparing devices in real time pretty much impossible, add to this partially overcast days, such as was used for the testing, and that can lead to some pretty unpredictable results I think, as some other commenters have identified. Even within the system not every single device will be uploading data exactly in sync . We have been doing solar installations for quite a number of years. We have always tried to design systems with the least point of failure. We also maintain solar systems and repair those installed by other installers that have Come and gone long ago. For the most part, I believe optimizers and micro inverters are used to replace proper system, design and planning. Those systems are by far the ones that we do the most work on and that owners incur the largest cost for maintenance. We have string inverters systems That have never needed to be touched once even after 15 years of operation.

  • @guillaumepiton
    @guillaumepiton 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hello. Can show the datasheet of the sma inverter? Have control the information of power about micro inverters and optimizers?

  • @michaeldautel7568
    @michaeldautel7568 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Did you change the test side to side? The picture shows a different shading pattern in the start picture left to right. Thanks

    • @solartimeusa
      @solartimeusa  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hey, the picture in the beginning ( test 1) appears to have some shading, but when looking from the front point of view, it was a different story. I used an office security camera to record the panels and sky all day, so timing was matching the photos to the second :)