Using Ignorance as a Weapon!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 พ.ค. 2020
- Xisuma Says Playlist ► • Xisuma Says
"Ignorance is bliss." Is that statement itself ignorant? Does drama play a role on influencing our feelings and beliefs when we hear a story or piece of news? Does assuming someone's thoughts and speaking for them actually make tension and anxiety worse overall? Let's talk about it!
Taken from the Hermitcraft Seven (26) Livestream 28/04/20
• Hermitcraft Seven (26)...
Edited by Adam Aarts
/ adamaarts
Links!
💜 Main Channel ► / xisumavoid
💛 Second Channel ► / xisumatwo
📺 Livestreams ► / xisuma
🔷 Twitter ► / xisumavoid
📘 Facebook ► on. xisuma_facebook
💻 Website ► www.xisumavoid.com
👍 Patreon ► / xisuma
#xisumasays #ignorance #drama
![ช่วยพาฉันผ่านเวลา - วสันต์17 [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HFnntWoqc54/mqdefault.jpg)
![[UNCUT] ฝันรักห้วงนิทรา | EP.9 (3/4)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ikd1tEhXbp8/mqdefault.jpg)
Next is ignorance’s brother, “i dont understand so you must be wrong’
Joseph Tan Yep. Humanity is weird.
And the sister "I don't understand so it doesn't exist"
The classic Karen argument.
@@egg_addict Brother, have you heard Xisuma's comment on "Karen"? It changed my mind, maybe it'll change yours
@@Tankej0527, I don't think you understand why the Karen meme exists, it isn't meant to be a generalization like you may think it is, it is meant to target specifically those annoying people, not just any white mom who has three kids.
Also in the May 27th live stream I donated bits and asked told him this:
"I really hate it when people bring out xisumasays clips whenever someone does something that contradicts what you say in someone else's comments because Xisuma can say what he wants, but why should that apply to everyone and why should the word of one person, sure you can say what you want but I shouldn't be forced to stop making memes in the comments, in a channel purely made for memes"
He misunderstood the last part about a channel made for memes, he thought I was talking about his channel, but I was talking about a different channel, anyway, he thought I was talking about people bringing out clips in his comments and he said he doesn't like it when people do that, and no I am not being a hypocrite, I am speaking on my behalf and using someone who you probably think is wise in a few aspects as backup, it ruins comments and makes them bland, you may not like having memes in your comments but people saying stop making memes in the comments in the comments is worse, it creates an annoying hindrance.
Also, the idea of being forced by one ideology because someone else said it also contradicts what he said, if you want to follow in what he does so much, then you are going against what he said, don't go devoted to a person who speaks to them in a parasocial environment and if you do do that then don't, if you can not just not do it then try and get someone to help you, it isn't healthy to be that way.
I think the seductive part of "I don't know, so I'm going to doubt [insert authority / expert / decision here]" is that when people feel like they don't know something, they feel like they don't have any power regarding it.
People really dislike feeling powerless.
So when they are presented with the idea that if they are doubtful, they can discard what they are doubtful about, it puts them into a position of power. And they like that. So doubt becomes a position of power, and they hold on to it, even when others are trying to educate them.
That makes a lot of sense; thank you for getting that across in a concise and clear manner.
always bringing out the reason and critical thinking X, never stop
yeah, never stop
I heard this before xisuma. It's so comforting to hear something wise, during all the nonsense people let loose, during this times
I thought you might be my favorite hermit before. But this type of intelligent reasoning and use of basic common sense (a rarity in the modern world) has solidified that spot.
Ignorance is a weakness disguised as a barricade, people can take advantage of it and turn it into a direction for propaganda to go. Understanding and assuming are two entirely different things. Being stubborn and one-sided is a recipe for drama and will result in both sides not getting their way. I remember a time where I myself was ignorant and assumed what everyone else thought, and looking back, it was really a matter of mindset. Had I paid more attention to what the other side was gesturing, what they were saying, and tried to be more understanding of their actions, I would have been in a much better mindset. But that’s the past now, and I’m glad I’ve changed for the better. Sometimes, the only way to solve a problem is to understand it, to empathize in a way, because it’s then that you can see a way out. Ignorance is blunt and stubborn, you need patience to combat it.
Sorry that that was long, it’s just important to understand that some ignorant people assume something of you, and if you can disprove it, that’s great. But if you can’t, they can be left alone.
@Samuel Prince Good for you! Keep on learning!
@Grace Crumpler Heheh, thanks ^^
Xisuma is too deep, that 222 levels of expirience are not a coincidence
The "haitch free" podcast lmao. X's accent cracks me up sometimes.
Alexander Acosta the way British people say h is great
@@bennyk384 depends on where in Britain they are.
Wow Xisuma that are some really good arguments ,I totally agree
Basic human instinct is to be scared of what we don’t know about. There is also the old age saying “ignorance is bliss.” I feel like all of these relate to each other and it’s an older way of thinking because the internet brought endless information to us with a press of a keyboard.
Honestly staying indoors is great! I have learnt a bit more about myself, plus I’ve also watched a lot of stuff I’ve always wanted to watch! Also, in order to stay updated I just follow the WHO, and no other news.
The best thing to do, especially as being stuck inside can affect the mental health of even an introvert like myself, is to not focus too much on the issue, especially as the news don't like talking about anything else at the moment.
I mainly get any updates from my parents, and the weekly all-staff e-mail that has replaced our staff meetings (I work as an IT Technician in a school, so am technically a key worker, as schools are open for children of key workers in the UK. Any updates from our Local Authority are passed on from the headteacher through our weekly e-mails). I also get a few headlines on my Reddit feed, though I make sure to check the comments to see any disputes over misinformation, especially the TL;DR bot if it's there, as Reddit is a popular place for that kind of stuff.
Besides that, I just get on with my day as usual, and my parents try to avoid putting the news on in the morning as before that I found myself getting quite stressed out more (though it was on for Captain Tom's birthday this week, which was amazing to see both his achievement and recognition, and how he has inspired so many other people to raise money for their local NHS charity in their own way)
Kieran Kieran Yes, I do agree with the part you said about affecting the mind. I myself am an introvert, and I’ve been going absolutely insane staying indoors... although I’m not sure why. I mean, before the lockdown I was perfectly fine staying indoors.
Usually, my parents keep the news on so I usually just hide in my room. I only get out to eat and sometimes spend a little time with them, but otherwise I stay alone.
Edit: Also, I’m sorry my response is really short after the one you gave...
I’m genuinely impressed by how intelligent he is, like he can think, something that other Can’t xd
He really is
Big brain Xisuma
Is that a lowercase xD
Hes too intelligent to only play minecraft
Im not saying minecraft is easy, but X has too much potential to only be used in the game, or at least the way he plays it, which is not bad at all, just not enough
Alexander Welsh Welsh yeah lol
I love how you discuss things in such a civilised and well mannered way instead of shouting or being condescending and stuff like that. These are wise talks that are really nice to hear
Ignorance is an industry, especially in politics and the media, it doesn't pay for the majority to be free thinking and reasonable, it's much easier to get your way with people who regurgitate your rhetoric rather than question it. It all comes down to education, the education systems as we know it today are the same as they were 100-200 years ago when most people would work in factories and other similar industries, people were taught to follow orders and not ask questions, while the workforce has changed education hasn't, drilling ignorance, gullibility and mistrust/outright condemnation for anyone who says anything that goes against their own beliefs is still highly beneficial for keeping people in check
I’m really worried about my mother, she actively reads all these things on Facebook that “debunk” the corona virus and why it isn’t real and it’s driving me insane
Yeah I have a similar situation with my dad. It's always difficult to confront/confince family members.
No one will attack your TH-cam in a dramatised way because they look for a response
If you're looking for beef, he's probably in his hacienda.
thank you so much, been driving me crazy as well.
i wish everyone could just stay calm and assume the best of each other. it seems like if people feel distanced from any group of people (like people in the government, or rich people, as examples) they act almost as if they aren't human. they treat these groups as their stereotypes (people in government are only ever corrupt and power hungry, rich people are always selfish and have life easier than they deserve, etc.).
everyone is just human.
I think most of the time people only want to see measures being taken untill it starts affecting them too.
I happen to live in Italy (in Tuscany) somewhat near the region where the second major hotspot for the virus happened (which is Lombardy, where Milan is located). People here are doing their best to keep theirselves in check and not go out and it is starting to work and we are about to test a really really small reopening of a few things (Construction sites, factories that manifacture products and the possibility to go to public parks while still keeping distance), so hopefully this counter culture of not trusting because "i don't know enough to care" stops. It will just get worse if people keep ignoring advice from people who do know what the consequences might be.
In the UK, hygiene and a basic understanding of how diseases spread is part of the National Curriculum (at least in England, each country has their own education system, though Wales generally follows England, to my knowledge), there's at least a very basic understanding of why social distancing works to slow the spread, even by those who had a difficult childhood. Most of the people I've seen who don't appear to be taking it as seriously (I have had to leave the house for work, a couple of times, as I'm technically a key worker, just that I can do most of my job from home) are people who may not have grown up in this country, and therefore may not have had the same education or the same trust of their government.
Whilst I disagree with the views of our current Prime Minister, he appears to be following the advice of the experts in this situation, from what I can tell. He may have acted late, but hindsight is 20:20, as they say.
You should question it. Questioning is good, as the truth will hold up to it. But denial is not questioning, and is not logical.
The taoiseach (Irish pm) makes a speech around twice a month, presumably for kids because he is very clear and straight forward. Every time he gets to a point he lists things that little kids might want to do and he asks questions like "when will I get to see my friends again" the answer is, we just don't know. His speeches are brilliant and I you're that interested I recommend his St Patricks day speech. Completely agree with you x
I think it's worse those people who talk about something and it's very obvious that they don't know nothing but they think that they know
I will say: there is a difference between 'spreading drama' and being legitimately upset with someone's actions and wanting other people to see it the way you do.
Posting this he-said-she-said bull is one thing. It's oftentimes bullying, especially if you expect some level of privacy, and it's taken away. That makes me sad.
But y'all, do y'all remember (oh I might get some hate here) Daddy'O'Five? the guy that basically abused 2 of his 5 young children emotionally and often times physically for views and a bunch of people made hardcore takedowns and then the kids were actually removed? That's, not drama, that's saving two, potentially up to five children from being abused and its the GOOD SIDE of public shaming, the GOOD SIDE of bandwagoning. It is the prime example as to why this behavior exists in us naturally because we survive and thrive when we band together against something.
My rule of thumb: if its information that is out there publicly (ANY well done expose on Jake and Logan Paul really, there is so much out there about why these two clowns are abysmal and should never be allowed near children's entertainment ever, ever, ever), OR that has the potential to get someone else hurt, like knowing someone is an abuser or predator. (*ahem* Dahvi Vanity) then shout it from the rooftops
If its private conversation, where there is a level of intimacy or nuance, then keep it to yourself unless people might get hurt otherwise. Not just hurt feelings like hurt.
Damn you are a highly skilled speaker! Please never stop making those podcasts
Top 10 Anime Weapons
Love these videos. X is such a smart guy and he's always open to new opinions and how logical and patient he is with people that don't understand it's great.
Good one but sometimes people just don't know
omg...again X...you are the man.....i couldnt have said it better myself......keep it up....love these little rants and raves .... ppl say Ignorance is Bliss..but i dont think so...i think its an insentive...to go out and learn about what you dont know...knowldge is key
X is actually Mycroft Holmes pulling all the ropes and strings for the British government, and is now sharing his frustration with unfounded and pointless opposition and criticism
Ignorance is bliss, isn't it
the problem with drama is that it generates more drama...
X is a youtuber we all should watch, he is very very wise, and kids, adults. All of us, could learn from him.
Was talking about this just today. Glad to hear it.
I wish more people had your insight
Bruh literally vegan gains with his fake beef
Couldn't have said this any better. Sadly, there's not enough views to spread this
Best use of "I don't know" is to drive "Where can I get more information?", not "I'm ignorant so I don't trust". "I don't know" anything about detailed maintenance of automotive devices. So I trust professionals in that field, and when lost or wary, do research into their claims. "I don't know" should be used to drive research or to state that you need more data to properly answer the queries.
Where I see this as a problem is when it comes through various forms of media. There is a natural assumption by the public that when someone is putting out content on some sort of media, be it TV, radio, podcasts, newspapers, blogs, megaphone, etc., that they are automatically assigned some level of credence that they know what they are talking about, the wouldn't be creating that content otherwise. So when someone that produces content says "I don't know about " the listener may interpret it through the lens of the assumption that the speaker knows more about the subject and come to the conclusion that is invalid. However, now it is so easy to put out content, whether or not the person(s) have the requisite knowledge, that they may or may not have the knowledge that they are implicitly given credit for.
preach brother preach 🙏
Completely agree, but at the same time it also functions in reverse.
Aren't we also giving into ignorance for following a group of people blindly?
In this case it's pretty obvious which one is right, but I can see the issue in a moral based dilemma.
There is difference between "I don't know because I'm ignorant" and "I don't know because you haven't explained your motives", and giving that most governments have a track of doing very questionable stuff with VERY questionable explanations which sometimes don't stack with an observed reality, no wonder people don't trust the government.
And here we dive into "I know what your real motive is" - if you've been told that this private house area will be replaced with a kindergarten, but you've got yet another mall or a church instead, and that happened a couple of times in a row, you won't believe them anymore.
For example, I remember when my local area was promised with a full blown waste recycling factory, _just to calm down people of that local area_ , but we've got a regular junkyard instead and it smells VERY BAD.
So, I guess it comes down to the government of your country: if it's known for screwing people over, people will be very unlikely to believe it in anything.
one thing in my approach that differs from what you said is - if you don't know, don't shut up - investigate - check sources and their sources, educate yourself to get a wider context of the problem, ask questions, form your own opinion and then share..
from what you're saying I can see that you do these yourself :P
Cheers, Sheshwami Void :)
Hi xisuma :) Not all politicians are good at explaining everything in details.... or who can or will tell about their background for changing the laws. But I thought that our prime minister in Denmark is very good at it. And that is why many do not question the changes here. If we, as citizens, do not get the information we need, it increases the opportunities for wrong decisions and thinking, which in turn is the basis for conspiracy theories. I'm not even one of those who see conspiracies everywhere, but some of them I can easily imagine may be right. I do use my logical sense and try to find out more about the cases and who is behind the sources, and based on what I come up with, I also examine who will benefit, financially or personally, if necessary. There is an old adage that says "There will be no smoke without fire". :)
@Jackie Tearie There are plenty of examples of cases that are awkward for conspiracy theorists .... such as "Area 51" "JFK" "9/11" "The Moon Landings" and so on. I don't do background analysis for everything. While I can easily see that these conspiracy theories could be true, they are entertaining reading and easy to see that they could arise. Here in the last few days there have been stories of Coronavirus and where and who should be behind this pandemic.
Some of these cover stories have been ... "A test center for viruses in Wuhan released the virus through some test animals from the laboratory". - "The US has invested money in the Wuhan test center" - "Trump is sure this pampering is man-made and is accusing China" etc.
Let's say those stories are true. Everyone knows that we have environmental problems that cause higher temperatures on Earth that melt the ice at the poles faster than good and which in turn affect the Gulf Stream. Which will cause colder and more extreme weather in Europe, for example, with much more rain and with much higher water levels in the seas around us and much warmer and extremely drought near Equator. At the same time that the population of the Earth is rising massively and food shortages may occur. All these future disasters would be solved by reducing the number of people here on Earth. That is my very brief version of the story. But I still believe in the best in people, although some are greedy and covetous. So while I can find many examples of these conspiracy theories being true, my inner self says that they are false. I want to see clear evidence before I think the opposite. :)
The coincidence... that I was listening to this while multitask scrolling through Twitter... and right as he mentions H3H3... comes up with Twitter's follow recommendations... *_and one of them's Ethan Kline_* 🤣
Its ethan klein* i believe :D
@@Lex-of6vt ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I had seen this Livestream today only and was cent percent sure this is for the XisumaSays channel
Yes!!! 100% love ya
Red Alert 2 soundtrack?
*Industrial base intensifies*
If you don't know about something then don't speak on it, except to invite explanation, is a rule I try and live by. If "I don't know" is all you can think to say about a topic, then don't say anything, and just listen for a bit.
Celebrity drama (drama in general, really), for instance, is something I tend to have nothing to say about. I don't usually know much about it, nor do I care to. I have enough stuff in my life stressing me out, why artificially increase that in a way that adds nothing and helps nobody?
I think the people from the first podcast think, that if the government isn't telling people how a situation is, the sitiation is bad. They probably already have a bad oppinion on their government.
Note that I don't agree with these guys and that you should trust your government until they do something clearly wrong. If you have no idea what they are doing, just imagine they're doing good. Especially in these times it's important not to fall into a pit of pessimism.
Stay safe guys! :)
Sam Harris, Penn Gilette, Christopher Hitchens, Xisumavoid.
Lol.
I'm categorically against these lockdowns (in my area especially) and I 100% agree with you. Lazy reasoning is the bane of my existance.
There are great reasons to go either way on the topic. Whats important is sharing are reasoning and understanding one another
Which podcast were you listening to?
When you watch the stream.
I just want to say I dont think he means scripted drama. Like theater. Just in case some theater kid is coming here pausing the vid and ranting.
You have my vote for pm
You keep on mentioning you listened to podcasts but which ones?
I think people are becoming more toxic because lots of us are stuck at home
Yeah. True side of us showing
Another word that can describe this ignorance stuff you speak of is confirmation bias.
Well though out and enjoyable, X!
When it says 53 seconds ago :)
Been binge watching hermitcraft season 6 during the quarantine so thanks for the entertainment
I prefer drama once it’s finished like The Right Opinion, then you can see it all from a retrospective and it usually becomes clearer.
Seeing oversights and hindsight makes for much better watching once you can have a better picture..
Do remember that the Right Opinion did have some drama himself though. His video on Storytime Animators didn't age very well, and nobody's immune to being biased.
aykay tm Good point, but he is better than those that create drama to benefit themselves.
Oh hello x finally a new vid
i don't know
I don't know (sorry) if i get what you are saying here.
But I often Say I don't know when I don't know something but not with the intension to say you are wrong cause i don't know or we shouldn't trust someones judgement because you do not know. When I do not know something I go and do some research and get informed. Your video confuses me a bit I Guess :)
@Jackie Tearie English is not my first language so I try to understand what you are saying here but:
Willfully ignorant just means that those people choose to ignore the evidence the facts and then you have people who are willfully ignorant and dramatize the fact they "don't know"?
I think i start to understand what Xisuma is getting at here thanks ! :)
Yeet
I would love for you to check out of "The Alt Right Playbook" series on TH-cam. I really goes over some of the ideas and philosophies that has been used to keep conservatives think that they are right when defending something so wrong.
Ah I was there :)
"Ignorance is Strength"
I wish the Serbian government was better, they responded well but we're already unstable, so this is a real bad situation.
At least our economy is just as good.
the most annoying line of reasoning in my opinion is
we don't know => god
He called Podcasts "Popcasts"
I don't think anyone is basing their criticisms of the lockdown on "I don't know." At least in centrist and conservative circles, people are concerned about their rights to religion, peaceful assembly, and freedom of speech being infringed and their lives being dictated by an out of touch elite. Michigan's governor is a perfect example of this. Rights do not stop being rights in time of crisis.
True :)
In times like this someone's right to not be sick is, for example, superior to someone's right to religious practice. As you go out to church, you might be contributing to the spread of the virus, and as you're rights infringe on someone else's, you loose those rights.
While i agree that rights do not stop being rights in a crisis, there is a degree to which you can apply it to. My rights should end when yours start, for example (and a very extreme one at that), i have every right to hold or possess a kitchen knife, but my right to possess a kitchen knife is not limtless; and i should not use it to kill other people. And if i do, i should not have the right to possess a kitchen knife anymore.
During these lockdowns the main priority is the community, so limiting your rights for now means that we can all have rights in the future; sacrifices are for a better future, and if you can't see that just because you want to exercise your "rights" then that is a behaviour that i consider to be selfish, endagering to other people and simply just wrong.
It is heartbreaking to see people online protesting the lockdown. Especially since i live in Italy, where the major european outbreak took place and i know first hand how it feels all of a sudden what the new normal is. I have gone from my normal day to day life with my University, my job, my friends and family to being relegated in a house alone with no one to interact with except my cat (excluding phone calls obviously).
People laughed at us when we started our own lockdown, but after a few weeks they all started agreeing just because of the sheer numbers. So please, when you consider "your rights" remember that your rights come at a cost. By you wanting to exercise your rights you are potentially taking away other people's rights to live in a safe environment away.
People died for the right to vote. People died for their right to live in a non segregated community. Those are rights worth fighting for. Your right to go to your buddy's house for a couple of months is not a right worth fighting for.
These types of comments about "my rights" and "limiting my freedom" are becoming exasertbating and frankly, very annoying. Just think about the consenquences of what reopening everything would do for us in a situation like this.
@Kurdan Wrong. No rights are held superior to other rights, as the rights laid out in our constitution are "God-given;" to put it in more secular terms, they are human rights that exist and are present REGARDLESS of government authority. Rights ARE NOT derived from government.
The rights elaborated in our constitution are specifically protected and "shall not be infringed"; to do so is an overreach of government authority AND against our rights as American citizens. Times of crisis DO NOT stop rights from being RIGHTS.
But tell you what, let's suppose that you're correct, and rights DO stop being rights the instant we decide a sufficient crisis has occurred to warrant their infringement. Suppose the world were to suddenly fall under a massive population crisis. Everyone outside the US dies, and most of the US population perishes as well. Would the government be within its authority to institute a mandatory breeding program? SURELY you'd agree with the infringement of men and women's right to bodily autonomy, given the stakes?
Or perhaps the US suffers from a sudden labor shortage, to be a bit more tasteful? Would you be alright with conscripting people who don't want to work and forcing them to work at threat of government violence?
How about organ donations? You're infringing on the right to life of anyone suffering from organ failure if you don't donate on of your kidneys, or lungs, or part of your liver, or some of your bone marrow. Your right to bodily autonomy should come second to their right to life!
How about the right to life? It's been discovered that, oh no, men happen to have some X gene that results in them all having a 90% likelihood of murdering someone within their lifetimes. Would the government be within reasonable bounds to eliminate this potential threat? How about we rephrase this as there's a risk of you getting other people sick, who then have a minuscule chance of dying? Should we enact this for the flu, as well?
Or Religion? How about a fanatical cult arises that enforces horrifyingly conservative gender roles, murders homosexuals, kills anyone who tries to leave the cult, and is attempting to subvert the US government? Would it be okay to infringe upon their right to meet in their churches, and stamp out the religion altogether?
That's how you're coming off right now. Rights in the US Constitution are NOT to be infringed, and are NOT superceded by other rights. There is no order of importance. They are held equal and to be protected, not destroyed. If your rights can be thrown away at a moment's notice, then THEY ARE NOT RIGHTS.
Note: There are limited and specific circumstances by which our rights may be infringed, which are laid out, such as punishment for a crime. If you have not committed a crime, then your rights are not to be infringed.
@@adrianmiranda3674 If you agree that rights do not stop being rights in a time of crisis, then nothing further needs be said; otherwise it comes off a bit like "I'm not racist, but..."
That said, rights do not become forfeit for the needs of the community. If such were the case, then my population example below would be acceptable. If the community makes use of slavery as a significant economic industry, as in the case of the American South during the 1800s, is that acceptable? If rights are contingent on the needs of the community, then slavery could be justified in that case. Given that slavery is held to be unjustifiable, obviously not.
I could say that the fact you have an extra kidney and a lung that you could be donating is selfish; it doesn't change the fact that you have a right to your own body. Just the same, you can call my being allowed to exercise my rights selfish, but that doesn't change the fact that I have the right to do such things. Your moral judgement has no bearing on the rights of others.
I don't think it was right for anyone to laugh at the lockdown, because I don't think it's right to laugh at human suffering. Some point at Italy's poor universal system of healthcare and how you're rationing ventilators to those under 60 as proof positive that universal healthcare is only universal until the government says it isn't. I also think this is detestable, because regardless of pragmatic truths it's wrong to stand on the suffering of others for the sake of being politically right.
Rights come at cost, yes. They must be fought for at every turn, or else they get relegated to being nonessential, or no longer being actual rights in time of crisis. Your value judgement of what rights are worthy and what rights are not worthy is irrelevant, thankfully; rights don't stop being rights just because someone complains about them. I can complain about your right to freedom of speech all day long, and still you will be allowed to say whatever you like.
But to get back to Corona, it's actually better than people spend less time indoors; if you're outside and socially distancing, you're actually less likely to get infected. Much like flu season, we see a spike in illness during the winter because everyone is inside and in close proximity to each other which greatly increases transmission rates. Further, Children seem to have near-zero rates of transmission to adults, so children going back to school is a viable option if proper precautions are taken.
And of course, lockdown is having a cost. If the economy collapses, there are millions of people at risk of starvation within the next six months or so, to say nothing of the increase in mental illness, domestic violence incidents, etc, etc. The lockdown comes with costs to both our liberties and lives, and it remains to be seen whether it will all be worth it.
Ignorance, huh... About that :/
Edit: Oh, I get it. I think you understand.
Sixth
First
585th
Forst
I used to love h3 but recently their content has just been awful imo