Lufthansa A340-600 Professional Very Smooth Landing at New York John F. Kennedy Airport!!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ย. 2024
- Like my facebook page for mini contests, pics, upcoming videos and more!!!
www.facebook.co...
Please rate, comment and for more travel videos please subscribe!
Donations are greatly appreciated: smarturl.org/xtill
Check him out:
/ cathayguy
Hope you enjoy!
Plane: Airbus A340-642
Airline: Lufthansa, LH
Reg: D-AIHH [Wiesbaden]
Flight Number : LH400
Airport: New York John F Kennedy International Airport, JFK, KJFK
Runway Used: 22L
Date: 30th December 2011
Flight duration: 8h 30min
Delay: None
Time of day: Around 1:00PM
Seat: Row 38, Seat 38K
Origin: Frankfurt
My previous trip: • Video
This is the fourth video I took on my 2011-2012 Winter trip to New York.
Thanks for watching :)
![[4K] PLANE SPOTTING Runway 13L Arrivals JOHN F KENNEDY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. (JFK) 3/10/21.](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/hS2f3JP29F4/mqdefault.jpg)
![Edelweiss Airbus A340-300 SCENIC Landing at Zurich | Approach and Landing | Cockpit Visit [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/9fja9xJ6KB0/mqdefault.jpg)
Lufthansa is the best airline. Very professional at all.
I like Air Austria a tad better, but both blow any U.S. airline away.
Fantastic landing!
dantorp11 --- have been watching quite a few of your videos of late --- and am a lover of all things
associated with aviation --- the way you shoot them is super--- and I don't think any other videographer can shoot and doccument scenes from inside the cabin --over the wing shots-- in terms of the landing and take-off series that you do ---better than you---!!! -- really enjoy your good work -- thanks for it and good luck ---!!!
I really appreciate that my friend! Lufthansa always have mind blowing service! More reviews are coming!
hey Dantorp 11 --- you deserve the praise---!!! --- your excellent and enjoyable work
speaks for itself---!!! Will continue watching your videos --and will watch out for the new stuff --as and how it comes up ---!! take care and all the best ---!!!
Most of my landings have been good except one flight into Sydney from Auckland. Blowing a gust and bucketing down with rain and thick fog. I remember descent, seeing flaps go to full and thinking we're still breaking through clouds and all of a sudden the runway appears, bang! Hit hard and full reverse heavy brakes. I remember thinking fuck too much wheel brake my eyes are going to pop out or were going to slide off and the antilock won't hold it.
Then we stopped and I realised although I love planes and studied aircraft since I was a kid, pilots know better.
Also, my mate flies A330s and he said its best practice to hit harder when wet to get the tires to spin up fast and not slide
Nice landing, you can tell he's really flying that plane, he's working the ailerons alot to keep it level. It looks like there was alot of crosswind from the left.
I'm happy to hear you're enjoying my videos :D I go there on almost all my school holidays haha :P
i heard people clapping it helps me remember the landing at manila and the pilot that landed in your video did a good job
Wow, this is yet another awesome video. What a nice landing, it was so good, people clapped. And the sound of the engines on the landing roll. Liked!!
Wow! It makes me so happy hearing kind people like you say good things about my videos! I really appreciate kind comments and I'm very happy I can entertain you with my videos!
I will continue to share my talent LOL :P Keep your eye out for some explusive 747-8i footage coming soon :D
Wow, not even a bump! Very smooth
Lufthansa is the best airline ! Nice landing !!
Awesome flare!
Excellent vid !
Excelente piloto pousar suavemente uma baita aeronave como essa.
Now that was a smooth landing, the benchmark for all other smooth landing claims.
And what a smooth landing!!!!
Where are you from dantorp11? You seem to travel all over the world, and I am quite jealous. Love the vids by the way!
Lufthansa land very soft 😃
@fearfulAC130 - Spoiler retraction is part of a checklist known as 'After Landing Checklist', surprisingly. Nobody in the cockpit can do anything unless a checklist is called for by the Captain. It's not a case of doing something because it's time; it's not flight simulator! The only reason is 99% the captain was preoccupied with talking, thinking, pressing, advising, etc., that he hadn't called the checklist for the FO to go through. I'm probably right because flaps also delayed.
I REALLY LOVE AND ENJOY ALL YOUR VIDEOS!!!!! I miss the a340-600 lufthanasa :( that was my last flight
Landing like a boss!!!!
@ollo1982 Whilst that's true, it's also the Captain who will taxi the aircraft, so in this case, on the ground, it will indeed be the Captain calling the checklist. I agree the FO does checklist calls (when he's PF) but not during taxi because that's always the captain. I was thinking taxi procedures when I wrote, rather than flying. But fair comment.
This vid is beyond amazing
I love lufthansa, but I live in Sweden and you have to leave so early when flying to New York, if you fly with SAS you can sleep for 3 hours more!
Thanks man, I use the Panasonic HDC-TM60! :)
Haha thanks mate! Videocameras don't emit any signals so even though they say you can't use them, they don't do more harm than a book :P
amazing quality What camera did you use?
@FSXreality The calling for checklist is done by the flying pilot... not only the captain... if the first officer is the flying pilot he call for the checklist...
Nice smooooth operator ;)
I can't really remember the last time i landed hard, except in las vegas because of the heavy turbulence. this pilot did a very good landing , but he could retract the spoilers before he turns, it makes it easier to get up the preasure in the hydraulic system so the chance of leaking is smaller. I fly the Airbus A380 (mostly) and it's quite hard to make a smooth landing with it, the secret is to pitch up at low speed
I can remember the last time I landed hard, it was on a UNITED 757-200 from Washington Dulles (hope I spelled that right) to SeaTac. The pilot damn near ran the plane straight into the Tarmac, and did not use the reverse thrusters but instead thought it was a good idea to slam on the brakes. If know anything about the Seattle/Tacoma area, you'll know it rains for 10 months out of 12. That caused the plane to skid across the Tarmac.
Dylan Tyerman Damn, i know what you mean of non visible landing. On a flight from Tokyo to Dubai there was a heavy sand storm in Dubai, i knew that a sandstorm is tough flying into but on my briefing they said nothing that it was going to be that large. So when we started our inflight to Dubai you couldn't see the ground and the ATC warned us of heavy storm, my co-pilot decided that it wouldn't hurt (td didn't ofc) but we continued the inflight, boy was it a mistake. When we were about 2000 M over the ground, you could hear the sant scraping into the windows on the front (It was turbulence too) anyways, when we touched the runway and hit reverse thrust 100% spoiler 100 % Flaps and i got a warning light on the Instument Board that the ABS were out, i knew there was going to be problem. So i was forced to lock the brakes and continue, the landning went good and the taxi too (i had a following vehicle to guide through the storm), so that was that history. Later that week i was informed that i had ripped up one tire on the left wing and that they had to repaind a bit on the front, but it was still a sucess for me, i got a lost of money too for my courage, about 43% added to my salery :)
The Aviation
I can honestly say I've never flown into sand storm that bad, I've only flown into one thing that could be considered a "sand storm", it was just a cloud of dust and sand that was caused by other planes taking off when I was flying out of Cabo in a Alaska MD-80. Not quite as exciting as your sandstorm experience.
Dylan Tyerman The reason they slam on the brakes these days, is because reverse thrust is waste of fuel since it's cheaper to replace the brakes. It also has to do with noise.
VivaLaEmil1
Huh, I did not know that. I thought the plane was so old that it had no thrusters. The TV screens in the 757 I flew on looked like my old Apple 2 computer monitor.
amazing i love aairbus a340-600!I know lufthansa airbus a340/330 IFE is not state of the art but does it offer a good selction of movies, games etc?
Sure! Please send me a PM for more info :)
Kanonvideo med A346 :D
Tack Dantorp
Beautiful!
Very smooth
I love your videos so much!. please do more flight reviews cos they're really good! How was the service from Lufthansa on this flight?
Great quality video!!
Great videos, im working my way through them!
I have a question though, how do you find the time to travel to america so often!?
Excellent
any Gatwick vides coming up soon?
Hit the 1080p and full screen as real as it can get
It's just if someone want's to use the sound in a flight simulator video they have to ask me first :)
Yes I got it right! Thanks so much Daniel! Your the best dude! Great video. I love JFK and I love the Airbus A340! Great combination for a video :)
WOW!!
I wonder if I'll ever get to fly my favourite airliner.
If you think that the pilot was female because the announcement after landing was made by one...that was the purser...but female pilots can make great landings, too...of course!
It's a damn shame LH doesn't fly to SJO. A twice weekly A343 nonstop between FRA and SJO would be ideal for me to visit my family. Currently, the only really viable connection is with KLM via AMS and PTY, then with Copa to SJO. Iberia nonstop to SJO is no option because of the bad rep they're supposed to have and because there's no flight between my hometown HAM and MAD. Only Condor flies there out of Germany via Santo Domingo right now, but I wish to avoid an aeroplane full of tourists.
You probably flew over my house!
Great vid! Keeep it coming :P
was it really necessary to have spoilers up all the way to 4:08 ?
@NGraps Well I couldn't hold the camera and clap?!!!! It not rocket science lol...
not use seing the a346 cause its waaaa too long. prefer the 345 or 343
What a greaser!
What is your favorite plane?
What do you mean by sound?
@FSXreality Yep... my bad! :/ Misunderstood your point there :/
@GSEspotter ahhaha you're right
Looks like it just came out of the paint shop not a single mark on it
I'm sorry what?!!
Where to download realife addon??
@TheBA579 Sweden
Omg this flight sim is very real.....
Boeing 777-300ER VS. Airbus A340-600
Yeah, ILS is very very professional hahaha
+flying98 ILS landing yes, but no auto landing. Auto landing isn't capable of to make a smooth landing like this. The automatic landing is a dry thud. The landing is neither hard nor soft. This pilot is very good and the runway is long enough to allow adjust the landing that way he did.
okay bitchh
Looks like he applied spoilers before touch down.
+NISMO N ATTACK 東瀛戰神 R34 Z TUNE The spoilers will deploy the second that the landing gear makes contact with the runway. Because the A340's gear is at an angle, the spoilers will deploy on the contact of the rear set of wheels however you wont feel the "bump" or hear much noise until the landing gear flattens out. If you want to see what I mean with the angle google image search for a340 landing gear.
movieman162 Thank you sir, so it's automatic? I thought it's manual. Actually, you can feel the bump, I can feel two bumps in a 777 with a much longer rear set. I actually felt 4 bumps in an A330 years ago, during cross wind.
Yeah spoilers have three settings, either off, flight detent (manual), or armed (automatic). When they are armed they will deploy as soon as the wheels touch the runway. So in the cases of some really smooth landings there can be a gap between contact and the aircraft "settling down" but for the most part you can feel it. There are some cases where they can be manually deployed in bad weather conditions where the crew want to make sure they are able to commit to the landing before they deploy the spoilers but for 99% of landings its completely automatic.
movieman162 Ah thanks sir. Have a question for you, will pilots use spoilers to stabilize the plane while taxing through horizontal spread of windeshear before reaching V1?
Not really, the spoilers would just produce too much drag meaning the aircraft would never takeoff unless it was a really long runway and even then it would struggle to climb. What pilots will do is use ailerons in the direction of the wind-shear, and then compensate for the turning moment created by using the rudder. A good example of this is a video on here called "crazy dangerous takeoff 767 in severe storm". You can see see that the ailerons are up in a similar configuration to the spoilers being up, however we can tell that the spoilers have not been deployed because the inboard aileron is also up (this only moves with movement of the yoke, not the spoilers). Ailerons stay up for the takeoff roll on the left wing (they will be down on the right).
you don't have to clap -_-
Wait... Women drivers are bad enough...but women pilots? They're better than men. >.>
Why are they speaking English if it's a German airline?
kinda flying to new york
+FaZe ReEq your point?
+Nathan Sandavol well, when I flew to NYC a few years ago with Air Berlin there were no Germans aboard, only Dutch and other European people so the origin of the airline doesn't necessarily mean that everyone speaks that language
+Nathan Sandavol I'm guessing you don't fly often