Introduction to multilevel linear models in Stata®, part 1: The -xtmixed- command

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 38

  • @achudakhinkudachin2048
    @achudakhinkudachin2048 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I watched 5 videos on mixed effect models today, that was the most concise , most comprehensive and most clear. Can't find words to express my gratitude to Chuck!

  • @wasafisafi612
    @wasafisafi612 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So many thanks for your videos. I am doing biostatistics and I can testify that your video are for a great help to me. Glod bless you and stata

  • @tihsu5534
    @tihsu5534 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was so nervous about using Stata for HLM, but this was immensely helpful and really comforting. Thank you for the great video!

  • @dali2477
    @dali2477 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Chuck is a genius for teach, genius for understand the concepts!!!!

  • @francisvergunst7467
    @francisvergunst7467 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Note that the "xtmixed" command has been superceded by the "mixed" command in newer versions of stata

  • @daz3lingdawn
    @daz3lingdawn 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Excellent video, clear explanation, smooth lecture. Just awesome. You should do more videos!

  • @meganmclawson
    @meganmclawson 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very nicely done. These are a terrific resource. Thank you, Chuck and Stata!

  • @MrRishirajkashyap
    @MrRishirajkashyap 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video, very intuitive graphics, thanks a ton

  • @SalehBabazadeh
    @SalehBabazadeh 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Chuck Huber! you are awesome! keep producing videos please.

  • @statacorp
    @statacorp  10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You can download the dataset used in this example by typing: use www.stata-press.com/data/r13/productivity.dta

  • @brysonmusonda4048
    @brysonmusonda4048 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent

  • @anonauthor2821
    @anonauthor2821 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for this. It'd be great to have a video on multilevel modelling with gsem (GUI + code).

  • @MarioRojas
    @MarioRojas 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very helpful!! Expecting part two.

  • @taidungman
    @taidungman 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    awesome! very clear explanation.

  • @tsegaytagesse9561
    @tsegaytagesse9561 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome explanation! But I am still wondering if you have something on how to use mixed effect models for Censored dependent variable (e.g. percentage data ranging from 0-100%). Thank you!

  • @cartmangreko
    @cartmangreko 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video sir.

  • @statacorp
    @statacorp  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    The analogy doesn't translate very well literally though my hand calculation is quite close to the -xtmixed-result. The reason is that -xtmixed- is fitting the entire model using all of the observations and variables simultaneously. You won't get the identical result if you consider one part of the model in isolation. The results also depend on the estimation method used such as ML or REML.

  • @gom5783
    @gom5783 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Stata 12, is the option 'covariance(independent)' default? In Stata 14, how can adopt this opt command?

  • @silviastroe1662
    @silviastroe1662 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi I was wondering if you could use the same procedure when the observations are nested within two levels that are not related, that is Level 2 is not nested within Level 3. For example observation in nested within "State" and observation is also nested within "Person"

  • @BomarMendez
    @BomarMendez 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for this great video!

  • @monoclonal
    @monoclonal 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome! Keep up the great work!

  • @rocuroniumprop
    @rocuroniumprop 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very useful - thanks!

  • @re_di_roma_is_back2388
    @re_di_roma_is_back2388 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi: can I do this when the observations are differente between states?

  • @karthik2k2
    @karthik2k2 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome !

  • @shivanithakur8938
    @shivanithakur8938 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it possible to apply Multilevel models when data set consists of 3 IVs of categorical nature and 1 or more continuous DVs ?..........
    My data set consists of 3 categorical IVs (1st IV consists of 2 categories, Second IV also consists of 2 Categories and 3rd IV consists of 3 categories).

  • @hamedkashefi9656
    @hamedkashefi9656 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do we make a table for this including random effect parameters?

    • @statacorp
      @statacorp  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The *xtmixed* command has been renamed to *mixed* . You can fit a model with *mixed* and then use the *collect get* command to collect the results from the command. You would use a named expression with *collect get* to display the random effects as they are shown in the output from *mixed* . Then you would simply lay out your table with *collect layout* . Please email us at tech-support@stata.com if you would like to see an example.

  • @amaranwar1249
    @amaranwar1249 10 ปีที่แล้ว


    Hi, I am working on multiple time series regression model. I check through corrgram, pperron and dfuller tests [in stata] that the dependent variable is stationary at level 3 while independent variables are stationary at level 2 or 3. Can we still run VECM when the variables are cointegrated but stationary at different levels?
    An other question is that VAR and VECM are the candidate estimation techniques for multiple regression time series. Is there any other technique for multiple time series regression?

    • @statacorp
      @statacorp  10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Please contact technical support with your question at www.stata.com/support/tech-support/contact.

  • @majailic-pupovac6087
    @majailic-pupovac6087 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    What would you do if you have two bases for clustering, but not on two levels? From your example, let say region and industry; so cases are clustered in regions and in industries?

    • @Tomahawk1999
      @Tomahawk1999 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      u run two different models, one for each cluster

  • @mly38
    @mly38 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    thnx a lot

  • @timothynixon584
    @timothynixon584 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    All,
    I'm using Stata 13. Does anyone know how to group-mean center the variables? grand mean centering worked with "mcenter". In Stata 14, group mean centering is just "center", but I'm on a different version than a person working wtih me.

  • @gunetmwalungali9768
    @gunetmwalungali9768 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This has simplified multilevel modelling

  • @뭐냐-j7y
    @뭐냐-j7y 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    야호

  • @animeshchowdhury448
    @animeshchowdhury448 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir,
    I am currently working on a meta analysis. But I am not able to produce association studies of allele contrast (A vs a). Except that all are done but can not understand how to calculate A vs a frequency. If you help me out it will help me a lot.
    Thanks