Remember kids, always sit broadside on to enemy ship because their shells will always overpen these days. You only get citadels on angled ships somehow.
one thing tho, World of Warships looks stunning. like can we take a moment to appreciate the art department especially at timestamp 5:47 where the moon illuminates the night sky and moonlight falls on the water and on the hull of the Novosibirsk. anyways great video PQ I look forward to the grind to get the Novosibirsk :)
Novosibirsk looks oddly similar to Kronstadt,but the guns are as deadly as if you played a battleship But from what i noticed..it does not have one gimmick which petro has...and that is the rear 360 degrees turret rotation
I honestly don't see the appeal of buying this ship. I feel Petro is better and enough for everything... Also can I get an F for villagers who protected Potato here? 9:34
@@blackyyy3292right lmao 12.5sec reload to petro’s 14 Vermont levels of AP pen Can overmatch super lights like mino Plus the other all armor and HP buff Personally I dont buy super ships period, but to say petro is better than this thing is questionable
@@blackyyy3292 But not 360 turret rotation, worse rudder, turning radius, 35mm side armor not 40mm...so yeah it will probably be better, that AP pen is crazy. But not better in everything. Also you can't use kuznetsov without retraining and it eats credits like every super ship...
@BigD321 This ship doesn't fill any roles that Petro can not at all. Of course, superships' roles in general are questionable but I think this ship will not be able to fill the role of Petro's in the first place. I also think the raised and vulnerable citadel and worse handling is not a good tradeoff for overmatching light cruisers and 1.5sec reload. I'm off better with my Petro than this. For me it is better and I will 100% not buy this. Period. There's no need to argue with someone random on the internet and about an imaginary ship imo...
You lose armor (35mm upper belt), sit higher in the water, larger superstructure, worse turret angle, no 360 turrets, worse concealment, worse handling. It's more of the case of do you want more fire power in exchange for tankiness and flexibility?
PQ Please try range mod on the petro or this thing. The Russian heavy cruisers are using a weird vertical dispersion parameter, and makes them having bad vertical spread in long ranges. I am not trying to convince people to snipe on the back, but it makes a world of difference around 16-17KM on petro.
try range mode. this makes the vertical dispersion of Novosibirsk and Petro better than "legendary" Mosck, up to 14km and better than Stalin up to 16km.
Not a fan about your decision to NOT use ASW to help Republique out on spotted sub, just to keep your guns on Seatle. Was the sub out of your ASW range?
Hey PQ, now that we’ve seen the end of the Russian heavy cruiser line, I’d like your opinion. I’ve got enough coal for a commander and credits for a T10. Would you pick Kuznetzov and the Petro line or Sansonetti/Venezia?
Kuznetsov. You can use it later on Moskva/ Stalingrad. All great ships. Venezia is a good ship but I like russian ships more. You have radar and hydro which is very usefull in random games.
@@grimmshredsanguinus2915no, it really has got better Pen than a lot of battleships. It is around the same level as the 508mm Incomparable guns. It's a bit crazy, but ey, it's a game
In terms of some armor parts and turrets definitely but it has a lot of improvements like the better reload. Most important thing is the CL Overmatch so Mino's just cant laugh at you anymore
@@vitezslavlorenc3479 Broadside yes but if you sit halfway bow in you can bounce petro shells while farming his Superstructure without any issue. With the short-fuze AP you are mostly doing full pens to him aswell and even when his structure is saturated you are doing decent damage. The sheer DPM is just too good and you still have your 16 torps if he tries something. I laughed on so many Petro's as Mino with this and as Petro by myself I know how Ugly It can be if the Mino guy has map awareness :D With the Overmatch of the Supercruiser it won't be as much fun as it is now :-)
The Russian, and Soviets, frequently had excellent engineering designs over the years. It stands to reason they would have great paper ships. Just don't make the mistake of thinking those pieces of paper will do the job in a real war!
I'll pronounce it for you one more time, you were closer this time. Nova sibersk is how you pronounce it. Новосибирск is a city, near the urals. Rather large city too. Хабаровск is pronounced habarovsk. For russian words only one vowel is hard, the others become soft. Hope this helps
this ship doesn't impress me at all. currently there are actually few "super ships" that are worthwhile. wouldn't mind if they removed them. But you played well
how do you take those bullshit dispersions so well, the inconsistence in this game is really turning me away, full accuracy build and my shots still going out like fire sprinkle, that just frustrating
Your videos are always amazing. I just really don't like you laughing for every sentences.. Its just annoying. But it is really my own opinion. Still love your reviews!
Its doesnt have any f u keys though right? So its a more natural tier 11 ship. Could you imagine a Super Petro and it had the same F key as a Annapolis or Edgar?
@@robbailie5878 It's more of a tier 10 than a tier 11. it just has a lot of pen....but otherwise there really isn't anything about it to set it apart from being a tier 10 cruiser.
Remember kids, always sit broadside on to enemy ship because their shells will always overpen these days. You only get citadels on angled ships somehow.
God don’t you just love how this game is rng based? Imagine if it was skill based
Seattle does have quite a trolly hull, really the only good thing about it
Don't forget the rear-funnel hit citadel bug.
@@EvoraGT430 it's not a bug brother, in fact it's a good thing, it shows that the armor and shell bounce mechanics work correctly.
that's how fuse activation and delay works
the ship designs is more similar to Riga, so its a super Riga
It is, since it's a large cruiser, it's a Riga with 15cm light cruiser guns.
@@neometallX u mean 25
@@neometallX25.4cm actually
I was talking about the secondaries. Can actually hurt some cruisers and destroyers.
It also has some 35 mm plating like Riga, though that's more of an issue at T12 than T9.
one thing tho, World of Warships looks stunning. like can we take a moment to appreciate the art department especially at timestamp 5:47 where the moon illuminates the night sky and moonlight falls on the water and on the hull of the Novosibirsk. anyways great video PQ I look forward to the grind to get the Novosibirsk :)
That why I still play this game.
@@capredcomet5621 Love how the game looks, but I hate the game
art department singlehandedly carrying the game and company
It's the developers who make all this work; not just the art department.
@@EvoraGT430 thats cap
I appreciate that voice crack upon seeing that the Seattle was still alive after sitting out in open water the whole time
Novosibirsk looks oddly similar to Kronstadt,but the guns are as deadly as if you played a battleship
But from what i noticed..it does not have one gimmick which petro has...and that is the rear 360 degrees turret rotation
All Petro main turrets rotate 360, not just rear.
Lot of overpen tho
Novo is supposed to be a kronshtadt pre-draft
@@vitezslavlorenc3479 wait seriously? I knew about the rear one but not the front ones as well. I dont have petro yet
This whole broadside Seattle strat seems to be working pretty well. Gonna have to give it a shot.
Idk man, my Seattle never liked it when I messed up like that
All these soviet ships are really beautifully designed especially the maroon color on deck.
When you get to make up a ship's design you can make it as aesthetically pleasing as you want.
I honestly don't see the appeal of buying this ship. I feel Petro is better and enough for everything...
Also can I get an F for villagers who protected Potato here? 9:34
Better reload, better penetration characteristics, higher damage per shell is not enough to get this ship?
@@blackyyy3292right lmao
12.5sec reload to petro’s 14
Vermont levels of AP pen
Can overmatch super lights like mino
Plus the other all armor and HP buff
Personally I dont buy super ships period, but to say petro is better than this thing is questionable
@@blackyyy3292 But not 360 turret rotation, worse rudder, turning radius, 35mm side armor not 40mm...so yeah it will probably be better, that AP pen is crazy. But not better in everything. Also you can't use kuznetsov without retraining and it eats credits like every super ship...
@BigD321 This ship doesn't fill any roles that Petro can not at all. Of course, superships' roles in general are questionable but I think this ship will not be able to fill the role of Petro's in the first place. I also think the raised and vulnerable citadel and worse handling is not a good tradeoff for overmatching light cruisers and 1.5sec reload. I'm off better with my Petro than this. For me it is better and I will 100% not buy this. Period.
There's no need to argue with someone random on the internet and about an imaginary ship imo...
You lose armor (35mm upper belt), sit higher in the water, larger superstructure, worse turret angle, no 360 turrets, worse concealment, worse handling.
It's more of the case of do you want more fire power in exchange for tankiness and flexibility?
Noh-voh-see-beer-sk
Edit: at least that's how Malteseknight and flamu pronounced it. Also it's in the Metro games. Good Vid PQ!
It's Noh-voh-see-beersk.
@K0MMyHuCT after some reading. Several countries pronounce it differently lol
the pronunciation is pretty good for an English native speaker! :thumbsup:
PQ Please try range mod on the petro or this thing. The Russian heavy cruisers are using a weird vertical dispersion parameter, and makes them having bad vertical spread in long ranges. I am not trying to convince people to snipe on the back, but it makes a world of difference around 16-17KM on petro.
Underrated on these cruisers
Does it have a similar effect on Stalingrad?
@@LaunchpadGP I don't think so.
try range mode. this makes the vertical dispersion of Novosibirsk and Petro better than "legendary" Mosck, up to 14km and better than Stalin up to 16km.
Profile looks like an emlarged Kutuzov. Kinda like it!
Not a fan about your decision to NOT use ASW to help Republique out on spotted sub, just to keep your guns on Seatle.
Was the sub out of your ASW range?
Hey PQ, now that we’ve seen the end of the Russian heavy cruiser line, I’d like your opinion. I’ve got enough coal for a commander and credits for a T10. Would you pick Kuznetzov and the Petro line or Sansonetti/Venezia?
Which nation do you play more of, Russian or Italian?
Kuznetsov. You can use it later on Moskva/ Stalingrad. All great ships. Venezia is a good ship but I like russian ships more. You have radar and hydro which is very usefull in random games.
I may be wrong, but I think you could citadel a conq's flat ass at 8km instead of aiming at superstructure
First impressions? We had our final impressions when they revealed it xD
So like the Petro, it needs good torpedoes.
This thing seems weirdly balanced considering it has vermont penetration?
it seems more like a super riga
The thing has better pen than battleships!
improved pen angles bro
@@grimmshredsanguinus2915no, it really has got better Pen than a lot of battleships. It is around the same level as the 508mm Incomparable guns. It's a bit crazy, but ey, it's a game
you get overmatch for light cruisers over petro
Pro content creater
how do yall have red coloured shells like that
This ship looks unironically worse than the petro
If petro was the super ship and this was the tier X it would makes more sense lol
In terms of some armor parts and turrets definitely but it has a lot of improvements like the better reload. Most important thing is the CL Overmatch so Mino's just cant laugh at you anymore
@@nicz7694 Mino never laugh at me in Petro :-) Its easy kill.
@@vitezslavlorenc3479 Broadside yes but if you sit halfway bow in you can bounce petro shells while farming his Superstructure without any issue. With the short-fuze AP you are mostly doing full pens to him aswell and even when his structure is saturated you are doing decent damage. The sheer DPM is just too good and you still have your 16 torps if he tries something.
I laughed on so many Petro's as Mino with this and as Petro by myself I know how Ugly It can be if the Mino guy has map awareness :D
With the Overmatch of the Supercruiser it won't be as much fun as it is now :-)
what is the castila?
"turd angle". lol
Somers video because auction pls with extra brownies!!!!!!
NOVO-SEE-BEER-SK
Does it outpen the Sevastopol?
From 10km and more yes...
Hector is a paid actor lol
since its not a submarine like petro I already think its more balanced
It reads as no-vuh-si-beerksk
Your pronunciationwas ok, especially at first part of the vid.
I want super Venezia. Or more like super Napoli.
I read it as super potatoe 😂
At this point the Russians have given themselves a better digital navy, as they have to compensate for all their military failure.
The Russian, and Soviets, frequently had excellent engineering designs over the years. It stands to reason they would have great paper ships. Just don't make the mistake of thinking those pieces of paper will do the job in a real war!
RNG Giveth and RNG Taketh Away
Needed more of the Petro traits to be interesting. 360 turrets and lower citadel
Idk, not blown away
Seems to be objectively worse than Annapolis, Conde, and Edgar. Those three are extremely strong, while this thing seems fairly well balanced.
it look more super riga
Cant beat Petropavlovsk with legeendary upgrade.
I've been called many things in my life, but a sub or cv player will never be one of them..
Appreciate the highlights, seems kind of meh. I really hate trolly dispersion.
We do agree, that we don't like it and hate everyone, who is playing it, don't we?
Didn‘t they also release an italian bb with 457 ?
it's still nda so ha can't show it
It was added to the live servers for testing
Its still nda and will be in testing for the next 2 or so months
I'll pronounce it for you one more time, you were closer this time.
Nova sibersk is how you pronounce it.
Новосибирск is a city, near the urals. Rather large city too.
Хабаровск is pronounced habarovsk.
For russian words only one vowel is hard, the others become soft. Hope this helps
Whos idea was this?
No-voss-cee-beersk?
Or no-vose-cee-beersk
This ship was hitting my bow for 10k every salvo in a St. Vincent, it was terrifying
this ship doesn't impress me at all. currently there are actually few "super ships" that are worthwhile. wouldn't mind if they removed them. But you played well
how do you take those bullshit dispersions so well, the inconsistence in this game is really turning me away, full accuracy build and my shots still going out like fire sprinkle, that just frustrating
I think Petro is better
Your videos are always amazing. I just really don't like you laughing for every sentences.. Its just annoying. But it is really my own opinion. Still love your reviews!
Very inconsistent guns, no thanks
To be honest the guns look really bad.
he lost me right at "not anything like des moines".
God... you really gotta stop saying "spooky." It's ultra cringey.
These ships are bad for the game.
Its doesnt have any f u keys though right? So its a more natural tier 11 ship. Could you imagine a Super Petro and it had the same F key as a Annapolis or Edgar?
@@robbailie5878 It's more of a tier 10 than a tier 11. it just has a lot of pen....but otherwise there really isn't anything about it to set it apart from being a tier 10 cruiser.
People saying tier 11s are bad for the game are weird, with that logic tier 10 are bad for the game cause they bully lower tier ships.
First! - Also, love your work PQ - SteelGunner [-AWN-] SEA Server
Please turn down the music it is kind overwhelming.