Art Historian Q&A: The Art Doctor answers your questions!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @kslangham
    @kslangham 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for explaining the pipe painting. Knowing what the text says makes it fun to look at.

    • @TheArtDoctor
      @TheArtDoctor  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Doesn't it? I love Magritte!

  • @kslangham
    @kslangham 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dad was glad to learn that his fruit plate smile at the Ritz can be considered art. :)

    • @TheArtDoctor
      @TheArtDoctor  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      TOTALLY. Tell Daddy he's an artist of everyday objects!

  • @mhyato
    @mhyato 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’m so excited about having finally received permission to not like Monet!

    • @TheArtDoctor
      @TheArtDoctor  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ha- yes, permission granted! :-)

  • @jesselangham
    @jesselangham 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not gonna lie, Remi adds a lot.

    • @TheArtDoctor
      @TheArtDoctor  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I should let him star in more videos...

  • @TheAsdfg12344
    @TheAsdfg12344 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    If art has to be a "creative" act, then what Duchamp's "Fountain"? He didn't create the urinal, he just declared it to be art. By that reasoning, your breakfast is art if you say it is.

    • @TheArtDoctor
      @TheArtDoctor  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Exactly! The urinal is art because Duchamp creatively imagined it in a different way. If I want to do the same to my breakfast, than voila! Art!

    • @EffySalcedo
      @EffySalcedo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Duchamp must have seen the urinal without prejudice, He saw it as he never saw anything like it before, but somehow has the sensibilities to perceive a creative act on how that object came to being and presents it in a way so that we may also encounter similar things as "objects of creative act" , he points us to the one who conceives or the origin