Worst Nuclear Accidents in History

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ก.พ. 2021
  • Get Merch designed with ❤ from kgs.link/shop-138
    Join the Patreon Bird Army 🐧 kgs.link/patreon
    ▼▼ More infos and links are just a click away ▼▼
    Sources & further reading:
    sites.google.com/view/sources...
    Nuclear energy creates an uneasy feeling of danger for many people: ancient and dangerous minerals are concentrated to awaken seemingly unnatural powers, creating toxic elements that, if they escape, can and have killed people in horrible ways. How many people has nuclear energy killed and how?
    OUR CHANNELS
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
    German Channel: kgs.link/youtubeDE
    Spanish Channel: kgs.link/youtubeES
    HOW CAN YOU SUPPORT US?
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
    This is how we make our living and it would be a pleasure if you support us!
    Get Merch designed with ❤ kgs.link/shop-138
    Join the Patreon Bird Army 🐧 kgs.link/patreon
    DISCUSSIONS & SOCIAL MEDIA
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
    Reddit: kgs.link/reddit
    Instagram: kgs.link/instagram
    Twitter: kgs.link/twitter
    Facebook: kgs.link/facebook
    Discord: kgs.link/discord
    Newsletter: kgs.link/newsletter
    OUR VOICE
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
    The Kurzgesagt voice is from
    Steve Taylor: kgs.link/youtube-voice
    OUR MUSIC ♬♪
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
    700+ minutes of Kurzgesagt Soundtracks by Epic Mountain:
    Spotify: kgs.link/music-spotify
    Soundcloud: kgs.link/music-soundcloud
    Bandcamp: kgs.link/music-bandcamp
    TH-cam: kgs.link/music-youtube2021
    Facebook: kgs.link/music-facebook
    The Soundtrack of this video:
    Soundcloud: bit.ly/39E64tf
    Bandcamp: bit.ly/3cCqKn0
    🐦🐧🐤 PATREON BIRD ARMY 🐤🐧🐦
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
    Many Thanks to our wonderful Patreons from kgs.link/patreon who support us every month and made this video possible:
    Oron Lavi, Michael Mroz, Killian Wildrick, Richie abel, NoodleDragon, Notthatfelix, Copyright, Dustoff, Onur Alp Aydın, Megustador, Alex Adams, Charles J Lander jR, Robin Yan, Necco, manu cordoba, Gravi Arthelis, Robert Bosse, Bryan Reed, Kris, PolarStick, Ashley Moore, Joseph Doyle, Marc Bouchard, Renan Kawano, Egor, Kenneth Gendron, Felix Held, Marcus Barcelos, Tomas Klos, Adam Jacques, Víctor BC, Michael Granitemountains, Akash Singh, Scott Weigle, Jonathan Mattson, Jackson Huang, Walter Bryan, Elias Martinez Jr., yetorland Gaming, bluebeeboo, leonard eshuis, CoCumis, Nate Sweet, bleed creed, Majkie, guy hircshorn, Justin Merrill, Kai Ein, Michael, Tyler Davies, Jessica Oldland, Sarah Roh, Alonso Galindo, Mark, GloobyBoolga, Kailash Bonjour, Ken, Ariella, Lasha Bezhashvili, SuperSage358, Edgar Aliaga, Zack W., Charles Henninger, luca coletta, Jeanne Gavenda, Dave Kary, Kyle Klofenstine, Callum Breene, Bob Kyne, Abraham Brown, Matt Ramlow, Heather, Nemanja Koviljac, Handarholf

ความคิดเห็น • 30K

  • @kurzgesagt
    @kurzgesagt  3 ปีที่แล้ว +6552

    Head over to our shop to get exclusive kurzgesagt merch and sciency products designed with love.
    Getting something from the kurzgesagt shop is the best way to support us and to keep our videos free for everyone.
    ►► kgs.link/shop-138
    (Worldwide Shipping Available)

    • @zxReid
      @zxReid 3 ปีที่แล้ว +172

      racecar spelt backwards is racecar

    • @firedogz84
      @firedogz84 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Dang 3rd

    • @JD-jz5rr
      @JD-jz5rr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      There have been around 20 trillion trillion (trillion 2 times is not a typo) sentient life forms, including trillions of mammals and 10s of billions of humans, that have been tortured and violated and raped and molested and degraded and murdered by nature. it's been happening for 100s of millions of years, on a global scale without even 1 second of pause in the action .~
      ~
      Life is without question the worst function in the known universe. But DNA psychology seems to have a literally undying dedication to ignoring this. Perhaps it all seems "deep and spiritual and beautiful" when you're whitewashing 540 million years worth of collateral damage. So what's the rest of the pricetag looking like? Why is this happening? And what exactly goes through someone's head, when they conduct a life experiment with a DNA code that literally invented torture, and yet they have the nerve to act surprised when things go wrong? ~
      ~
      Because DNA evolution is just an error code, it is literally mutants and mutation, not even mutating on purpose, and the entire mutant code was strung together by chaotic incident of physics. It does not know what it's doing, or that you even exist - neither DNA nor the universe has anyone's back.
      ~
      That also means this much harm is being caused for no sane purpose. You've probably seen people acknowledge life has no purpose, but The DNA Delusion creeps back in like a virus, "Life has no purpose... so you make up your own." That means senseless torture is being caused for a made-up purpose.~
      ~
      Even supposed intellectual, rational, secular thinkers can't seem to let this notion go: "The universe created life so that it could..." - just keeps missing the point - not only of this philosophy but of evolution's truth entirely. It didn't do anything so anything.~
      ~
      And this is precisely the knowledge that the philosophies of ‘Efilism’ and ‘Antinatalism’ are trying to spread to make the madness stop.

    • @hiimjustin8826
      @hiimjustin8826 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Happy Tuesday!

    • @jasonshen5144
      @jasonshen5144 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Wow

  • @noodlefunny
    @noodlefunny 3 ปีที่แล้ว +62645

    I would definitely like a whole video about nuclear waste

    • @byxci
      @byxci 3 ปีที่แล้ว +303

      Fr

    • @NegetiveRizz
      @NegetiveRizz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +195

      Fr

    • @lei965
      @lei965 3 ปีที่แล้ว +161

      Fr

    • @benitomussolini3192
      @benitomussolini3192 3 ปีที่แล้ว +466

      They can explain anything and I will love it

    • @Apheem
      @Apheem 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      💯

  • @tilesmhomas
    @tilesmhomas 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26240

    "Let us know if you'd like a whole video abou-"
    YES

    • @DarrensGeneralInfo
      @DarrensGeneralInfo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +138

      Yes. Same here 😂

    • @vinecat8451
      @vinecat8451 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      Same here xD

    • @santibinelli
      @santibinelli 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      YES

    • @YaNoAwantoMas
      @YaNoAwantoMas 3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      @@DarrensGeneralInfo no one cares about India.

    • @memerman9268
      @memerman9268 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@iwantsexseemyvideo2053 stfu

  • @immortalsun
    @immortalsun 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2128

    I like how the title is “Worst Nuclear Accidents in History” but the video isn’t really about that. Basically a trick to get people to realize how safe nuclear energy is compared to fossil fuels, and I love it.

    • @Vuden13
      @Vuden13 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Radiation

    • @michael-sama7723
      @michael-sama7723 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      True. Really unique and well-explained.

    • @SovereignTroll
      @SovereignTroll ปีที่แล้ว

      The UN is right after all....

    • @vioricapopescu8300
      @vioricapopescu8300 ปีที่แล้ว +126

      The good kind of clickbait

    • @Silverwind87
      @Silverwind87 ปีที่แล้ว +61

      I feel like the main reason everyone's scared of nuclear energy is nuclear bombs and Godzilla.

  • @0nkelD0kt0r
    @0nkelD0kt0r 2 ปีที่แล้ว +512

    There is also another factor to this than the pure numbers: Deaths related to nuclear, and renewable energy sources are nearly exclusively related to accidents, while the deaths related to fossil fuels are overwhelmingly a result of regular operation. Accidents can never be eliminated completely, but they can be reduced in frequency and severtiy by good preventative measures. So the potential death numbers of these energy sources are even lower, while fossil fuels will just keep on killing until they are phased out.

    • @steeledminer616
      @steeledminer616 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      To add on; this is why these other sources get such shock value.
      It's easier to see something that kills 100 people instantly.
      It's a lot harder to see something that kills 1000 people over the span of a year.

    • @Max-fw3qy
      @Max-fw3qy ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol, just a single nuclear accident will render huge areas unusable. Look for Fukushima, even after 11 years it is still f*cked up

    • @CircusFoxxo
      @CircusFoxxo ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@steeledminer616 2 people died in Chernobyl instantly due to the blast. 28 in the weeks following due to radiation poisoning. That's *it*. 30 people. Fukushima killed nobody.

    • @steeledminer616
      @steeledminer616 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@CircusFoxxo Oh sure but I was just illustrating the key reason the shock value exists with blown up numbers.
      But you're right the reality is it's a lot tamer than that.

    • @CircusFoxxo
      @CircusFoxxo ปีที่แล้ว

      @@steeledminer616 30 people die one time and it kills the entire nuclear industry. 40 people die in the US and 20,000 globally every single year in coal mining accidents

  • @mikhaeldito
    @mikhaeldito 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2641

    Deaths per energy unit sound like a stat for a weapon in a game.

    • @lorenzovalladares8909
      @lorenzovalladares8909 3 ปีที่แล้ว +113

      Inches per assault rifle

    • @d2n0life52
      @d2n0life52 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@lorenzovalladares8909 bahahhaa

    • @pandapops5428
      @pandapops5428 3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      @@lorenzovalladares8909 Isn't that what they use in America to measure things? (I'm European)

    • @killianc7356
      @killianc7356 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That’s funny

    • @canon-de-75
      @canon-de-75 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      this smog cannon kills 35 people per energy units... but it has no critical hit ability.

  • @insulinator
    @insulinator 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2860

    "let us know if you'd like a whole video ab-" "YES WE OBVIOUSLY DO"

    • @leongrinis191
      @leongrinis191 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      100% we'd love a vid talking about Nuclear Waste

    • @ace7789
      @ace7789 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Somebody give this man some likes

    • @ge-orc8286
      @ge-orc8286 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oh we really want one...

    • @Erik-pu4mj
      @Erik-pu4mj 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Absolutely yes.

    • @laufert7100
      @laufert7100 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I'd watch a Kurtzgesagt video on hot to walk probably, it's so good

  • @Alexandra-yl5dh
    @Alexandra-yl5dh ปีที่แล้ว +143

    This completely changed my point of view on nuclear power. I thought it was more dangerous than fossil fuels. I’m so glad I stumbled across this video.

    • @viddog6457
      @viddog6457 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      yeah, I changed my mom's mind on the subject too

    • @etholus1000
      @etholus1000 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's still very dangerous, an accident can leave an area uninhabitable for generations. We really need to PERFECT nuclear energy before we completely phase out fossil fuels. Trust me, I really want nuclear energy to phase it out, but we need to improve the technology and perhaps find better alternatives before we do. Solar energy is something we could definitely use and could be utilized better. One thing really holding us back though, is greedy companies that profit from fossil fuels and buy political power

    • @smaller422
      @smaller422 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@etholus1000 did you watch same video everyone else did?

  • @Athanatos3301
    @Athanatos3301 2 ปีที่แล้ว +206

    I can partially understand the fear from some people regarding nuclear reactions. However, I feel that many disregard the fact that it is virtually impossible for another nuclear accident to occur in power plants that utilize modern technology.
    In a modern day nuclear plant, there are a high number of fail-safes to ensure that no meltdown occurs. There are also plants that utilize much safer energy sources to ensure that rogue reactions (which aren’t common to begin with) or problems with materials don’t occur- for example, Thorium is extremely safe compared to Uranium (look up Sam Onella’s video regarding Thorium for more information in a similar vain to Kurzgesagt).
    One other problem that many people have is the radiation involved with nuclear reactions. While it is true that this is an issue that can’t be absolutely prevented- protective barriers, suits, and other measures are taken but are not absolute- this video really hit the nail saying that it is significantly less likely for people to suffer side effects or death in comparison to all other forms of energy. The numbers just don’t lie.
    Nuclear waste is an issue that’s also difficult to combat, but it’s leaps and bounds easier than trying to revert all the damage that the atmosphere and environment have taken through the use of fossil fuels. Worst comes to worse it is theoretically possible that we could launch all nuclear waste into space (just my own speculation), but I’d much rather deal with getting rid of nuclear waste later than trying to deal with an exponentially growing problem that jeopardizes all life on the planet in the form of air pollution and global warming.
    With the modern measures taken to ensure that accidents are a near impossibility and how efficient they are, I really think that the fear of such powerful technology needs to be trusted more as the processes get even safer.

    • @user-ye4rd3ou6p
      @user-ye4rd3ou6p 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      福島の原発事故において最も重要な事は”日本は地震が多い。”という事です。日本人として地震は日常的に起こりうるものであり、マグニチュード8級の地震は数年に一回のペースで発生します。また、日本は4つのプレートの上に乗る薄い膜のような物で、環太平洋造山帯の巨大なカルデラ火山や、津波の脅威に常に晒されています。

    • @TheBestAround131
      @TheBestAround131 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The main problem we face is making sure we properly dispose of the waste; we have so much of if stored above ground near major water sources in the U.S. that millions could be exposed to radiation poisoning if we don't do something about it in the near future. But yeah, in the long run, I'll take nuclear plants over fossil fuels any day: at least we can deal with nuclear waste!

    • @TheExplodingCore
      @TheExplodingCore ปีที่แล้ว +7

      If you think about it nuclear waste is the only waste that is being contained. Launching into space is not practical. Too heavy and there's a chance of launch failure/explosion.
      Burying underground is the best way. Remember that nuclear fuel is diluted with solids and molten glass to a point where it's radiating much less which means it's decaying slower which is the reasons it radiates for such a long time in the first place. It can not leak, it doesn't crack and release fumes, it's pretty much inert and just radiates a little bit. It's really not that bad.
      Combine that with the massive energy density..

    • @TheExplodingCore
      @TheExplodingCore ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@TheBestAround131 You could place a nuclear waste castor in your garden and it wouldn't be bad. Some company once started placing them above ground and the only reason they stopped was because of massive backlash driven by people who irrationally assumed it's extremely dangerous and could be weaponized.

    • @yuhanchen7145
      @yuhanchen7145 ปีที่แล้ว

      Imean, ejecting all of it into space there's going to be an accident, and I don't think there's something much worse than pumping a metric ton of nuclear waste over Houston.

  • @TheInquisitor2012
    @TheInquisitor2012 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2656

    "Do you want us to make a video about Nuclear Waste ?"
    Do u really need to ask ?
    *_MY HUNGER FOR KNOWLEDGE, KNOWS NO BOUNDS_*
    *_GIVE US THE SAUCE_*

    • @goutamboppana961
      @goutamboppana961 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      YES
      except in schools

    • @luciferlyset7543
      @luciferlyset7543 3 ปีที่แล้ว +69

      @@goutamboppana961 Let's be honest, you learned at least 5x more from this 10 minute video than an entire day of school (unless your actually attending a nice school).

    • @robertspeedwagon982
      @robertspeedwagon982 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      The Quest for Knowledge knows no bounds !

    • @professionalfurret7225
      @professionalfurret7225 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Just hope it doesn't explode!

    • @tusharmehta4890
      @tusharmehta4890 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I am pretty sure that you watch hent@i

  • @michalkocourek5401
    @michalkocourek5401 3 ปีที่แล้ว +761

    Governments: *Chernobyl is an irradiated deadly place that everyone should avoid*
    Also governments: Lemme just put this coal power plant straight into this major city.

    • @liem11
      @liem11 3 ปีที่แล้ว +96

      Fun fact: Normally you get more radiation from living next to a coal plant then a nuclear plant because coal spews mildly radioactive particles everywhere. Still tiny enough to be negligible though.

    • @AverageAlien
      @AverageAlien 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      Exactly. Anyone anti nuclear energy is most likely a coal, gas, or renewable shill

    • @lukad7744
      @lukad7744 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ok so I'm opening replies and closing the again and you're getting 2 likes per second
      That's impressive

    • @majormelon8855
      @majormelon8855 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      "Also let's provide tourism to chernobyl"

    • @oerthling
      @oerthling 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Complete BS. Nobody is building coal plants "into" major cities. Also recent fossile plants have mostly been natural gas, not coal. Which are also not built "into" major cities.

  • @defry1234
    @defry1234 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    After working in nuclear for almost a decade, I agree it is the safest. The safety culture of nuclear (at least in the US) is pushed very hard. A lot of training goes into even being able to access the sites. Almost all maintenance outages that I have worked have had no OSHA recordables, and many not even minor first aids.

    • @toddboyce3599
      @toddboyce3599 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Not just in the United States, (Or USA or US or America if you prefer any of those nicknames) Canada's most Important Province, Ontario, gets most of their power from Reactors and might even be safer than America's reactors.

    • @cybertramon0012
      @cybertramon0012 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Chernobyl is really a double-edged sword for Nuclear as an option.
      On the one hand, the screwup there made sure everyone became much more aware of the risks and determined to make sure it never happens again.
      But on the other hand, it’s also the example everyone uses as to why Nuclear is dangerous. That, and the fact that Chernobyl itself won’t be safe for about 20,000 years, which sounds so much worse than greenhouse gases and heavy metals.

  • @EthanPricco
    @EthanPricco 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    4:25 Doofenshmirtz Evil Incorporated

    • @thenoobypro790
      @thenoobypro790 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I didn’t see that Easter egg

  • @evilbull8995
    @evilbull8995 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1606

    This reminds me of that one spongebob quote:
    "He poisoned our water supply, burned our crops, and delivered a plague unto our houses!"
    "He did?"
    "Well no, but are we going to wait around until he does??"

    • @leotenenbaum6806
      @leotenenbaum6806 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      Sounds lime they need to push him somewhere else

    • @num9908
      @num9908 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Hahahaha I love it.

    • @blauwbeer556
      @blauwbeer556 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Is it that episode with the dolphin and volcano?

    • @enchantedshears5357
      @enchantedshears5357 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That monke in the intro has so much more relevance now to me.

    • @aizek0827
      @aizek0827 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I'd like to know what's this has to do with the video

  • @_nines8270
    @_nines8270 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2377

    "We don't have anywhere to store used nuclear fuel, so it's bad"
    Well, we don't really have a good place to store fossil fuel emissions, but that hasn't stopped anyone

    • @delphidelion
      @delphidelion 3 ปีที่แล้ว +117

      Best comment

    • @Wile1412
      @Wile1412 3 ปีที่แล้ว +92

      Never thought of this comeback before, genious.

    • @flowild
      @flowild 3 ปีที่แล้ว +171

      everybody would love nuclear if you could breath in nuclear waste

    • @SomeoneTookAK
      @SomeoneTookAK 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I.. I have no argument about this yet

    • @AlponseE1ric
      @AlponseE1ric 3 ปีที่แล้ว +108

      But we do have great places to store nuclear fuel, in fact, inspectors of dry cask storage units for spent fuel on site receive less radiation exposure than pilots

  • @leem057
    @leem057 ปีที่แล้ว +75

    I know this is an old video but I feel the need to comment. I have worked in nuclear power my entire adult life, and it is far safer than almost everything else. I feel like the major issue is that the general public is extraordinarily uninformed about nuclear power, and how it actually works. It seems like the majority of uneasiness about it is that the vast majority of people know next to nothing about it. They also know next to nothing about fossil fuels, and as such form an uneducated opinion based of 2-3 accidents that occurred decades ago. They have no idea the number of deaths that occur annually with traditional fuels vs nuclear, which is in the thousands for coal and basically 0 for nuclear. There is a lot of doom saying about nuclear, but as a short term option, it's as good as it's going to get.

    • @tyjones3566
      @tyjones3566 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I’m still gonna support renewables over nuclear. I understand how safe nuclear is, but the resources are still finite. You still gotta dig the stuff out of the ground and there’s only so much of it.

    • @Johannes_Seerup
      @Johannes_Seerup ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@tyjones3566 dont see nuclear and renwables as enemies but as partners

    • @the_deal0525
      @the_deal0525 ปีที่แล้ว

      And with the net positive on nuclear fusion it is heading in a really good direction

    • @connerwiseman4876
      @connerwiseman4876 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@tyjones3566 Currently, Solar panels in industry can last ~20 years being generous, they’re made of rare earth metals that are more *finite* than fertile and fissile materials for nuclear, the idea of solar energy seems to produce the illusion that’ll last forever, but the stuff required to make the panels isn’t as common as you might think, and can certainly run out when you need thousands of panels to match a single reactor during daylight hours, and then every panel needs replacing as well. Your intuition is good but it leaves out a few critical details

  • @trippingandbrowsing1269
    @trippingandbrowsing1269 2 ปีที่แล้ว +202

    "Saving millions of lives seems to be something we should all agree on"
    Bro, I know you all lived through the same 2020 as we did.

    • @filipstamate1564
      @filipstamate1564 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Meaning what?
      Oh yeah, of course, those who didn't agree with the methods must be insane psychopaths who just wanted people to die.
      Obviously agreeing on the goal you must also agree on the same methods. There can be no other way in the fascist "liberal" new world order.

    • @trippingandbrowsing1269
      @trippingandbrowsing1269 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@filipstamate1564 happy Thanksgiving to you too. Hope one day you stop politicizing a pandemic and attempt to live a normal, conspiracy free life.

    • @mrtalos
      @mrtalos 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      More depressingly I was talking about death rates for energy consumption and the guy I was arguing said that was unimportant

    • @dbclass4075
      @dbclass4075 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@mrtalos Since fatality is unimportant, nuclear is even more favourable in terms of consumption. For kilowatts of power, few grams vs. hundreds of barrels. Additionally, the latter's price is unpredictable.

    • @mrtalos
      @mrtalos ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@dbclass4075 you would think, but no apparently.

  • @mattsika8518
    @mattsika8518 3 ปีที่แล้ว +614

    When you learn about how safe and clean nuclear is, it just makes you mad how demonized it is

    • @Sprachkonzert
      @Sprachkonzert 3 ปีที่แล้ว +81

      RIGHTTT? Especially Thorium reactors and the other new generation reactors could help us deal with climate change and air pollution

    • @Mystarr111
      @Mystarr111 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Are u ok with all other countries building nuclear plants as well? Is this a technology that should be made cheaper and more wide spread. To say Iran?

    • @HypercopeEmia
      @HypercopeEmia 3 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      @@Mystarr111 why anyone would be not okay? A cheap and sustainable way to produce elcricity of any country

    • @Old_Ladies
      @Old_Ladies 3 ปีที่แล้ว +127

      @@Mystarr111 Iran already has a nuclear power plant. Also making nuclear power plants and nuclear weapons are two vastly different things. Stop fear mongering.

    • @sceerane8662
      @sceerane8662 3 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      ​@@Mystarr111 If a country wants nukes it will make them given time. Preventing them from having nuclear power will not be able to stop them.

  • @wefuntw
    @wefuntw 3 ปีที่แล้ว +653

    using coal to replace nuclear seems most stupid effort ever.

    • @garis5345
      @garis5345 3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      @@PancakeBoi you are unfortunately right, and it is very similar in Austria

    • @BizarreCoyote
      @BizarreCoyote 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      It seems that way because it *is* the most stupid waste of effort ever.

    • @deesevrin8570
      @deesevrin8570 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I've yet to hear of a better microcosm of climate activism.

    • @SickoFromHell
      @SickoFromHell 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      @@PancakeBoi they even buy energy power from France (75% of France energy production is nuclear btw)

    • @ReatuKrentor
      @ReatuKrentor 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Yes it is.
      Did you know the ashes coming out of the coal power plant chimneys is radioactive? A coal power plant puts more radiation into the environment than a nuclear power plant.

  • @toddboyce3599
    @toddboyce3599 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    When I was in grade 4 I was all in for nuclear power and called the other energy sources "The boring power" Mainly because I thought mass destruction with nuclear weapons was satisfying.

  • @GanerRL
    @GanerRL 2 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    seirously, nuclear energy (especially thorium, which would make a rlly good video) is like, 100x better in every category for producing energy. The fact we aren't funding it is insaine

    • @thesixthsola
      @thesixthsola 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This is so true. Keep waking people up.

    • @dbk-red-son
      @dbk-red-son 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Seriously like, if the choice is between "revert climate change and severe harm done through fossil fuels" or "find a way to dispose of nuclear waste" i think the second option is wayyy better

    • @GanerRL
      @GanerRL 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dbk-red-son it's not even hard or expensive to get rid of nuclear waste, and my point isn't even climate change, just it completely beats all other forms of energy production in terms of energy per dollar and in safety (and everything else lol)

    • @Duros360
      @Duros360 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Im glad I dont live in authoritarian-totalitarian country, but wow sometimes the general public shouldn't be trusted to vote or have an oppinion on decisions like this :/ lol
      Short sighted sheep, scared of safe power production in favour of coal...then again, no-one ever said that public opinion was logical :(

    • @Duros360
      @Duros360 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GanerRL I actually thought that reprocessing is meant to be amazing as it can actually give more exotic fissionable (fissile?) materials? so if anything (in this anaology) we can burn petrol, capture the exhaust and turn it into a little jet fuel but instead we're just storing the result :S

  • @Fr0stPh3onix
    @Fr0stPh3onix 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3219

    Kurzgesagt - the only channel that can make you afraid of breathing

    • @AverageAlien
      @AverageAlien 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Hiw?

    • @Smallest_robut
      @Smallest_robut 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Bro tbh

    • @shanewhaley6706
      @shanewhaley6706 3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      True but i still watch

    • @x3woots
      @x3woots 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Exurb1a be like:

    • @cielrobinson
      @cielrobinson 3 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      i dunno. i'm scared of breathing within 2 meters of anothed person because of what i've seen about covid.

  • @deeperdee
    @deeperdee 3 ปีที่แล้ว +572

    Ah yes, the ratio that oil tycoons fear the most: deaths per energy unit

    • @ordenax
      @ordenax 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Are you being sarcastic?

    • @rogeriocosta1035
      @rogeriocosta1035 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Even if you not include all deaths from the wars for Oil and the indirect death caused by the economic and violence problems around Oil producers countries, I think it will still be a bigger number.

    • @iwantsexseemyvideo1512
      @iwantsexseemyvideo1512 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      ვლოცულობ

    • @farlanghn
      @farlanghn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What are solar panels made out of?

    • @Marinealver
      @Marinealver 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      okay, lets move to nuclear power
      NO WE DON'T WANT TO DIIIIEIEEEEEEEEE?
      I would say COVID has a 98.8% survival rate, but obviously it is the cowardly that survive, not the curious.

  • @hanro50
    @hanro50 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    The thing to remember is that most of the exceedingly deadly isotopes created by nuclear disasters tend to have very low half lives.
    A site can remain radioactive for years, but a good amount of the isotopes causing extreme levels of radioactivity will likely burn themselves away in decay within the first few months after the disaster.
    Naturally this is ignoring some of the social effects of such a disaster....
    Anyway...when isotope half lives are thrown about I like to compare it to a bomb and a candle. The bomb is deadly as it releases a ton of energy all at once. A candle can be made to release the same amount of energy, but since it takes hours instead of milliseconds. It isn't exactly deadly...

  • @cosmodoge6565
    @cosmodoge6565 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I raised my hand one day in school during a discussion about renewable energy and tried to make a point about nuclear energy. Some kids were like 'Pah! Haven't you heard of Chernobyl?!' But a surprising amount agreed that it was one of the safest if managed correctly.

  • @mstegosaurus
    @mstegosaurus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +848

    "Let us know if you would like a whole video about [nuclear waste]."
    Yes please.

    • @brotherdj777
      @brotherdj777 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      How do I get to heaven? Will my good deeds be measured against my bad deeds? Do I need to be a good person to go to heaven? How do I know if I'm good enough?
      Well the bible says no man is good, for all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. So how do we get to heaven? Answer: By believing on Jesus Christ who took the punishment for our sin on the cross. There are no amount of good works we can do to achieve salvation because salvation is a free gift of God. We need to humble ourselves, realize we are sinners and that we need a savior.
      John 3:16
      For God so loved the world that He gave his only son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.

    • @Player-257
      @Player-257 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Heck yeah!

    • @melanch0lycat5393
      @melanch0lycat5393 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@brotherdj777 The fuck are you on about lmao

    • @melanch0lycat5393
      @melanch0lycat5393 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@KINGJERMARCUS Gtfo with your self promo, if your music is actually good then it'll naturally become popular.

    • @reyz360
      @reyz360 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@brotherdj777 the fuck?Dont post this anymore.....

  • @faizfrez2729
    @faizfrez2729 3 ปีที่แล้ว +666

    "would you like...."
    Everyone: "YES."

    • @aidanafandi5263
      @aidanafandi5263 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I feel like watching animation of bow masters lol

    • @aidanafandi5263
      @aidanafandi5263 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @RITA - I WANT Š È Х ! САLL МЕ ! You're profile sucks and harem😠

    • @retsreinyrelgeinthrelaveri1456
      @retsreinyrelgeinthrelaveri1456 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@aidanafandi5263 it's a bot

    • @aidanafandi5263
      @aidanafandi5263 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@retsreinyrelgeinthrelaveri1456 A stupid one

    • @chongus3092
      @chongus3092 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Copied

  • @woogigooie
    @woogigooie ปีที่แล้ว +4

    That sound at 3:00 actually sent shivers down my body. Made my anxiety spike intensely.
    I have no idea why.

    • @poopymcnuts
      @poopymcnuts ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's what your sleep paralysis demon sounds like

  • @MrMarinus18
    @MrMarinus18 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The biggest difference between Fukoshima and Chrynoble is that in Chrnobyle the reactor lit blew while in Fukoshima it held. Everything around the reactor core was absolutely devastated but the core itself held. It did get a big crack in it and a lot of radioactive gas leaked out but in Chrynoble the reactor core itself, the fuel rods and everything was blown high into the sky.

  • @delicatepath2923
    @delicatepath2923 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2706

    I can't imagine one day when the Kurzgesagt team replaces the narrator. His voice is so important on Kurzgesagt's videos.

    • @accuratejaney8140
      @accuratejaney8140 3 ปีที่แล้ว +153

      I'm sure that if he can't do it anymore, they'll find a voice double (Is that the term? I'm thinking of stunt doubles)

    • @Randomela
      @Randomela 3 ปีที่แล้ว +167

      As much as we love his voice time does not stop, even for Steve. But, if they WILL replace him due to old age (sorry Steve) then let's hope we will not notice any obvious.

    • @leviticus0
      @leviticus0 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Ikr

    • @lapissed9620
      @lapissed9620 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Yes. it wouldn't just be the same without him

    • @fabriziocarbajalpimentel4700
      @fabriziocarbajalpimentel4700 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      I hope technology will grow till theyre able to copy this voice

  • @HystericalBanana
    @HystericalBanana 3 ปีที่แล้ว +813

    Politicians: Listen to the science
    Also Politicians: *tears down nuclear plants for coal plants*
    Scientists: *surprised Pikachu face*

    • @electronresonator8882
      @electronresonator8882 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      politicians : create this weapon of mass destruction
      Scientists: : say no more

    • @Ufos4dahoes
      @Ufos4dahoes 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      If you think coal is more dangerous then nuclear, then you're apart of the problem.

    • @Captain_Derp
      @Captain_Derp 3 ปีที่แล้ว +146

      @@Ufos4dahoes it literally is

    • @GlobalerKlimastreik
      @GlobalerKlimastreik 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Well, that's simply not true. Germany reduced both, nuclear energy and coal plants, in the last years.

    • @leopaveley
      @leopaveley 3 ปีที่แล้ว +60

      @@Ufos4dahoes Did you watch the video?

  • @moodywoodygoody
    @moodywoodygoody ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You failed to mention what is considered the third worst (and by some estimates the worst) nuclear disaster in history that had far greater impact than even the Chernobyl meltdown. On September 29, 1957, the Russian ‘restricted’, unmapped town of Chelyabinsk-40, where the Russian government had secretly decided to build an atomic bomb, experienced a reactor meltdown that produced an explosion of 300 cubic meters (10,600 cubic feet) of 70-80 tons of highly radioactive waste. In comparison, during the Chernobyl incident there was primarily a release of iodine-131, which has a half-life of just 8 days, while the Chelyabinsk-40 explosion released strontium-90 (with a half-life of 28.8 years) and cesium-137 (which has a half-life of 30.2 years). The Chelyabinsk-40 explosion had affected 270,000 people living in the region, and the present generation sees an unusually high levels of various types of cancer illness to this day. The Russian government tried to hide the true extent of this incident from the public for decades.

    • @Yusuf-ke5iu
      @Yusuf-ke5iu ปีที่แล้ว +1

      do you know the difference between a nuclear bomb and a nuclear power plant? one is made to kill, the other to produce energy, one is not included in this conversation because they are fundamentally different.

    • @firstlast-uy3zr
      @firstlast-uy3zr ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Yusuf-ke5iu I suggest you read my comment again, read the title of the video again, and watch the video again, and then think about the relevance of your own comment to mine.

  • @axmaz_lazy
    @axmaz_lazy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I cant stop imagining about how you have found your animation style. its soo perfect.

  • @Cryptlcal
    @Cryptlcal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2150

    Bruh these guys could talk about the dissapearance of my tv remote and I would still be fascinated

    • @3manu3l_xd
      @3manu3l_xd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Lmao

    • @3manu3l_xd
      @3manu3l_xd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @T teg Egg I would if I could

    • @SafeRemain
      @SafeRemain 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@3manu3l_xd what

    • @hilal_younus
      @hilal_younus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      I’ll pay More than what I pay for Netflix if it means they’ll actually do an episode like that

    • @NVRSE500
      @NVRSE500 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Probably because they would be able to explain where exactly it is using quantum mechanics lol

  • @anaskova7229
    @anaskova7229 3 ปีที่แล้ว +508

    All Kurzgesagt videos:
    Introduction: calm
    We might all die: panic
    There are solutions: calm

    • @pridedoggo
      @pridedoggo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      Most of Humanity being to stupid for the solution: panic

    • @cherie..cherry
      @cherie..cherry 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@pridedoggo also many people not being able to do the solutions by either pride, ignorance or having no say like poverty

    • @RamonChiNangWong078
      @RamonChiNangWong078 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Say we all this "problem"
      introduction: I'm hungry, what to eat?
      We might all die if we don't eat.
      There are solutions: calm

    • @CELLShockXFX
      @CELLShockXFX 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      None of the solutions ever get used: panic

    • @maxwelldegn6651
      @maxwelldegn6651 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I believe you mean kalm and panik

  • @tiny7118
    @tiny7118 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Interesting comment about death count tolls. I was actually thinking about how they calculate death tolls in wars (mainly world wars). Would love a video on the subject

  • @KristoferLindVasquez
    @KristoferLindVasquez 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    I would really like to see an in depth video on nuclear waste. I've heard that some of the waste can be reused as fuel again.
    Thank you for all your awesome content!

  • @miles3101
    @miles3101 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1001

    Kurzgesagt: "Saving millions of lives should be something we can all agree on"
    Fossil Fuel Magnates: Let us introduce ourselves.

    • @kamanashiskar9203
      @kamanashiskar9203 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Well, they can be renewable energy or uranium magnates.

    • @starofcctv94
      @starofcctv94 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Yes but money

    • @alexsamuraiuuu
      @alexsamuraiuuu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Exactly

    • @sp4c1ng_0ut8
      @sp4c1ng_0ut8 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      ahhh, capitalism. You always fail me

    • @michaelnord9081
      @michaelnord9081 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Anti-nuke greens: Let us introduce ourselves.

  • @rulerrex3
    @rulerrex3 3 ปีที่แล้ว +518

    Imagine being scared of nuclear energy and then going back to fossil fuels LOL

    • @vomm
      @vomm 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Imaging being scared of nuclear energy and then not going back to fossil fuels and then have an atomic accident in one of the most densily populated areas of the world LOL

    • @user-zz7le5qc6x
      @user-zz7le5qc6x 3 ปีที่แล้ว +84

      @@vomm yeah, sure, let's breath smoke from coal, oil and gas. Oh, and you know one funny thing? There are radioactive particles in the coal. So yes, nuclear stations - including accidents - produse *less* radiation then coal stations.

    • @stansman5461
      @stansman5461 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      @@vomm did you even watch the video? The only modern accident that did happen had zero kills. It was only the panic that caused deaths.

    • @ajrtuber
      @ajrtuber 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      @@vomm Did you just black out for half the video where they explain such dangers are miniscule?

    • @pablo450e
      @pablo450e 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      That's what is actually happening... sadly...

  • @starside5990
    @starside5990 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    yes, i'd like a video on nuclear waste storage issue as in the past I had doubts on it. Now i'd like to broaden my knowledge about how to solve this issue. Thank you very much

  • @arizonaranger5106
    @arizonaranger5106 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    I’m proud that like 60% of Canada’s energy production is made by hydro (we can really take advantage of our lakes)

    • @preetams9184
      @preetams9184 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Your population is so low that u dont even need that much electricity.

    • @Poohdork
      @Poohdork 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@preetams9184 That's true, but consider this: Canada generated 400 TWh in renewable energy, while the USA generated 800 TWh in 2020. So, while the USA has 10 times our population, they only generated twice as much energy from renewable sources than Canadians. Food for thought.

    • @franzicoy
      @franzicoy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do you use those lakes as heat sinks for your nuclear reactors, though?

    • @Mbeech121
      @Mbeech121 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Now if we could get the last 40% to nuclear we would be golden

    • @BruWaves
      @BruWaves 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Here in Brazil we have 66% of our energy production by hydro and it is a great solution to the environment. Of course we change the benefits by other horrible problems in this country but overall it's a great solution.

  • @estoniaisunderrated5120
    @estoniaisunderrated5120 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1279

    People be like “listen to scientists” then you tell the that nuclear energy is the best and they’re like “but not about that”

    • @victuz
      @victuz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      Nothing is by chance. If people are ignorant and paranoid and it comes to nuclear energy, it's because radioactive accidents and wastes sparkled it.
      I'm not against nuclear energy, but we DO have to be completely aware of all the radiation that comes with it's implementation and how can we efficiently deal with radiation if plant accidents or soil contamination manage to happen.

    • @colon-Thorn
      @colon-Thorn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +109

      it is understandable, people don't just "listen to scientists” but they use them to get more narcist about how much they know, they trust those who say they are right, and ignore those who say they are wrong.

    • @jackalenterprisesofohio
      @jackalenterprisesofohio 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@victuz BUILD IT IN THE OCEAN

    • @superior96
      @superior96 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@jackalenterprisesofohio you're joking right?

    • @niknik2308
      @niknik2308 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@jackalenterprisesofohio send it to the moon

  • @Mrbesano
    @Mrbesano 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2313

    Kurzgesagt: Let us know if you'd like a whole vid..
    me: yes

    • @pivtriv5529
      @pivtriv5529 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes

    • @technoraver99
      @technoraver99 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      some ideas for a better planet
      Matthew 5: 27-28
      “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
      Luke 17:1
      And he said to his disciples, “Temptations to sin are sure to come, but woe to the one through whom they come!
      better stop producing / uploading / watching "music videos".. (or similar videos, pics, profile pictures, thumbnails, title names, headlines, usernames + harmful comments, bad words, lies, disrespect, harmful lyrics etc! on social media + everywhere else too.
      "Temptations to sin" / seduction etc. must stop)
      start deleting? censoring etc.?
      destroy your smartphones, cams, data storage devices etc? would be better.
      remove temptations / seduction + other evil things from TV, magazines, radio stations, broadcasting etc? would be better.
      many young people are watching those videos (or reading / typing harmful comments, or doing other bad things!) etc. all over the world. and its NOT ok!
      parents? (or people in authority): intervene?! seriously
      wait.. there is more:
      harmful drawings / comics / animations etc, clothing / styles / hairstyles / behaviour, facial expressions, gestures, dancemoves, acting, exercises, sports etc.
      harmful things in video games, news, reports, interviews, vlogs, tutorials, movies, series, trailers, entertainment shows, (+ backgrounds + surroundings), books, art, artworks, calendars, posters, business flyers, catalogues, leaflets, packagings, stickers etc. (words, speeches (+ voice types, vocal color etc), music, sounds, visuals, references! etc.)
      harmful things in stores and online shops, advertisements + advertising, commercials...
      + better stop online dating and other harmful things!
      maybe..
      support ocean or river! clean up organizations? (i think it is of high importance) (in india, pakistan, africa etc)
      + support animal welfare (animal shelters (money for food or new fluffy dog beds? blankets?, small fluffy carpets? (+ washing machines?), pet vitamin supplements, + pet supplies (dog toothbrushes?), pet toys, dog hairbrush? (parasites!) bath towels?, medical checks, dental care? / nail, paw care? etc. pet heating pads? heated dog houses? (for winter or in cold areas), pet cooling mats / pads (on hot days, summer etc), diesel powered portable generators? (outdoor electric power generation) (to run vacuum cleaners, washing machines etc), solar lamps? (smart lighting solutions), transport vehicles, maintenance work etc. + other improvements, additional staff + volunteers, more safety, beautifications? etc. topiary?
      + animal rescue ? (dog rescue projects in india?), animal hospitals? (in poor countries or districts) or homeless people in your area? (btw governments should help these people! seriously. fast / adequate / individual support?!)
      support some of them?
      as an act of goodwill.
      + always be careful: corona etc.!
      or become a firefighter, volunteer firefighter (+ driver? (pump operator), paramedic or ER doctor? ER nurse? ambulatory care? or shuttle service? (for people with disabilities)
      + be cautious: corona, hepatitis, tuberculosis etc!
      become an instructor? (fire and rescue?, emergency medical services?, advanced driving techniques?, advanced first aid?, psychological first aid?, wound care management!? + preventions (decubitus!, contractures!, thrush!, periodontitis!, loneliness?? etc) (nursing homes / home care / hospitals etc. + training seminars for employees) + hygienics?, high angle rescue techniques?, first aid for pets?, basic pet care?, junior firefighter programs?)
      start reading medical books? (anatomy? / physiology? / ECG interpretation? / EMS (paramedic books?) or nursing books? or blood banking and transfusion medicine? or dental engineering? medical or rescue engineering? medical dictionary? (illustrated)
      become a dog trainer? (rescue dogs, avalanche rescue dogs, therapy dogs) education? + watch out! dogs, cats etc. can transmit / spread corona!
      become an animal rescuer or animal doctor? + watch out! CORONA! (protection, safety measures etc.)
      caution! they say: Coronaviruses are zoonotic, meaning they are transmitted between animals and people!
      maybe... plant a tree? many trees? a walnut tree?? in a park, garden or backyard?
      a walnut tree = food source (for birds etc) + oxygen generator.
      + provide water for animals in summer? fresh water source? or bird bath?
      or food? (daily? or several times a week?)
      use checklists to improve efficiency?
      snowy days? become a snowplow driver? (volunteer?)
      or towing service worker?
      or pharmaceutical supplier?
      + be cautious: corona!
      new technologies + other cool things:
      Far-UVC light (222nm) efficiently and safely inactivates airborne human coronaviruses?? (+ flu virus and many other?)
      do research? progress? + installations? (in offices, busses, trains, restrooms, elevators, classrooms, corridors, stairwells, hospitals etc?) .. could save lives.
      + improve immune systems? (food nutrients?)
      + portable plexiglass virus shields? (for counters, offices, workplaces, waiting rooms, buses, trains, passenger cabins etc) + air purifiers? (with HEPA filter)
      + limit the number of customers in stores, shopping malls, buses etc?, keep distance + distance floor markings?, + keep windows / vehicle windows wide! open for ventilation?
      + stay at home?
      amazing tools for rescue workers: portable hydraulic StrongArm (r) for firefighters etc.
      ( jawsoflife com ), hands free thermal vision (in mask imaging system), in mask heat vision (temperature display etc) or c-thru technology.
      + there are more amazing tools!
      high rise rescue solution? SPARS parachute rescue system? ( cosmic-rs com )
      fireproof clothing? + fire escape hoods?! (fire escape hoods and fire escape masks are designed to help you to escape from a burning building. each of these fire escape masks and hoods allows you 15 ? minutes to flee through the toxic gases / smoke)
      smoke detectors with LCD display?, CO detectors?, fire blankets?, fire extinguisher? (+ fireproof clothing, cap, gloves, safety glasses etc?) (+ fire extinguisher selection chart?)
      fire suppression systems? smoke extraction? fire protective coatings? (or anti corrosion?), seat belt cutter? useful gift idea? for family or friends etc. (or useful teaching books etc.)
      support fire and rescue departments / services in poor countries or districts? (new helmet lamps, safety clothing + shoes, new equipment, fire escape hoods,
      thermal monitoring? (thermal vision will help you to track down a fire's source and smouldering fires in dark. glowing embers as well as fire hot-spots can be detected and fighted very fast and efficiently! + mobile infrared cameras could detect hidden hotspots or locate people in smoke-filled buildings),
      first responder kits etc. / communication devices (wearing! portable radios), new vehicles? a turntable ladder?? training verhicles? new motorcycles? (+ customizable / agility / more efficiency, + difficult terrain / crowded areas etc),
      new firefighter / rescue helicopters? (certain areas)
      new reanimation boards (for nursing homes / hospitals etc), new lifters? (patient transfer solutions), protection equipment / protective gear (corona), medical oxygen??, ventilators?, AEDs + first responder kits, pulse oximeters, diagnostic penlights, glucometers? (+ strips), + various batteries (or battery charger?), blood pressure cuffs, stethoscopes, weight scales, label machines? (for clothing or other personal things), rescue blankets?, stifneck collars?, thermometers, neck pillows, heating pads / cooling packs (or aspirators + tubes, IV poles, (+ IV (intravenous) nutrition), breath exercisers, electric shavers!, nail clippers!, glasses cleaning cloths, non-slip socks! and many other good things + health care products (high quality products?) etc, compression bandages, medical dressing (+ anti pressure sores (decubitus!) elbow / heel protectors / pads / comfort cushions etc), CPR training simulators?, disposable ambu bags?, new rollators + replacement parts (+ hip protectors etc), wheelchairs + replacement parts (footrests, leg rest, headrest + cushion, armrest pads + comfort pillows?, cushion pads etc. to prevent pressure sores!), gel pads for shoes + back heel pads etc (+ improved skin inspections?! + treatment + reports + regular checks (+ photo documentation? with digital camera (disease / wound / injury processes! etc), anti decubitus air mattress for additional prevention?, + prevent hand contractures? (hand / wrist / finger splints?, hand therapy ball exercises?), auxiliary eating spoon and fork? (stroke hemiplegia rehabilitation training) comfort grips cutlery? (great for parkinson / disabled, suffering with tremors and trembling hands etc), medical alert system solutions?, own phones for all employees? (more efficiency / more safety), electric armchairs (more comfort), ergotherapy? (useful + less loneliness! + caution: corona!), water dispensers (less dehydration) (+ caution: edema / pulmonary edema / other diseases etc.), outdoor corner sofa + table? (garden, terrace / + all weather proof) + electric awning?, lighting solutions? + cool floor / garden lamps? (solar?, waterproof), teamwork + helping each other? (+ watchfulness, attentiveness, helpfulness, care, + honesty, accuracy, + giving helpful tips / hints, + politeness, being thankful, being focused), + preventing back injuries? (employees! / patients) (lift and carry properly. (+ teamwork? / use tools and aids?) + gymnastic exercises for a strong back?, (+ protect (treat carefully) your joints, elbows, kneecaps etc! + your nerves!), + energy and resource saving concepts?, tasty / healthy food? (+ additional: instant soups?, ready meals?, canned foods? for hungry employees / night shift etc), (+ vegan cooking books? give it a try? at home?)
      + other improvements, beautifications, more safety, comfort etc. + spreading good mood? (less sadness etc) (+ please be careful: corona!)

    • @pivtriv5529
      @pivtriv5529 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@technoraver99 did you really write that very long text

    • @technoraver99
      @technoraver99 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pivtriv5529 copy paste

    • @jakejones5895
      @jakejones5895 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pls whole vid

  • @viddog6457
    @viddog6457 ปีที่แล้ว

    6:29 thank u, you really help with my debate and I love that u list the sources so i can use them

  • @Jungleboy-ik4dy
    @Jungleboy-ik4dy ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Would love to see an analysis of each towards the environment. Other then just the ozone and climate change. Looking more at space used by solar farms or the mining of resources to make each. For hydro how they affect the river systems.

  • @joethepotato6174
    @joethepotato6174 3 ปีที่แล้ว +526

    Moral of the Story: Nuclear energy isn't perfect but fossil fuels suck even more.

    • @misanthropicservitorofmars2116
      @misanthropicservitorofmars2116 3 ปีที่แล้ว +65

      Same with renewables. They just aren’t viable for large scale energy needs.

    • @FowlorTheRooster1990
      @FowlorTheRooster1990 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      just look at all the deaths fossil fuels have caused compared to other sources of energy

    • @BlueRGuy
      @BlueRGuy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      How about the sun?
      *N O*
      Why?
      *The sun is a deadly heat ray*

    • @pancake5830
      @pancake5830 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      @@BlueRGuy deadly laser*

    • @KarkatVantasandMitunaCaptor
      @KarkatVantasandMitunaCaptor 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@misanthropicservitorofmars2116 source: trust me bro

  • @user-zy4xe9yt4o
    @user-zy4xe9yt4o 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2165

    TH-cam : "Remember,recommendation is faster than notification."

  • @tatianaCDB
    @tatianaCDB ปีที่แล้ว

    would love another video about storing nuclear waste!! thanks for all you do, I learn so much from your vids!

  • @PoweredIncorporated
    @PoweredIncorporated 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Not-so fun fact: there is at least one person watching this video that will die prematurely as a result of germany dismanteling all of their nuclear reactors

  • @christophertstone
    @christophertstone 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1582

    Yes, more videos about Nuclear power: options, problems, technologies.
    Discussion will lead to awareness, awareness will lead to change.

    • @thatsaxenaguy8734
      @thatsaxenaguy8734 3 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      We need to spread the word brother, if more people become aware about how good nuclear energy is we can create enough pressure to convince politicians to make more nuclear power plants. I recommend everyone to share this video to as many people as they can.

    • @sha6395
      @sha6395 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Change will lead to the dark side

    • @microwave1000
      @microwave1000 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      My motto right there

    • @96Champ994
      @96Champ994 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      i really need a nuclear fusion video from kurzgesagt. recent developments and such.
      once we get these babys running, every other energy production methode will be a thing of the past.
      and it will be 100% clean aswell

    • @aculnay
      @aculnay 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I would really like that. Especially, as I lately hear more and more about breeder reactors, which can burn normal nuclear waste and produce waste that only has a half life of 50 years.

  • @TimeBucks
    @TimeBucks 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5078

    Yeah definitely want a full video of nuclear waste

    • @noniseto2747
      @noniseto2747 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Timebucks

    • @poetsrear
      @poetsrear 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      We do need it, as nuclear is the only energy source with which we can make it through alive, but people are against it based on comics of mutants and pretty much nothing concrete.

    • @El_Sapo2501
      @El_Sapo2501 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      especially because nuclear waste could just be stored on the reactor site or i could be processed in smaller fast breeding reactors. But nobody uses them because thez produce even more plutonium then common nuclear reactors.

    • @akshaeee
      @akshaeee 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      agreed

    • @chrisprilloisebola
      @chrisprilloisebola 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same

  • @mikekvia320
    @mikekvia320 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I would like a video about recycling nuclear fuel

  • @timlapham2583
    @timlapham2583 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    WOW!!!!!!! You made me think about it, that's for sure. Thank you for the video.

  • @yaff1851
    @yaff1851 3 ปีที่แล้ว +657

    Green Party on climate change: Why do you not listen to science???
    Green Party on nuclear power: Don‘t listen to science!!!

    • @w0mblemania
      @w0mblemania 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Bingo.

    • @devluz
      @devluz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +101

      Green parties around the world have this conflict with a lot of topics. With climate change they are on the side of science but with other topics like GMO's, alternative healing methods and use of modern technology in general they are all over the place. For someone who is pro Green and pro science & technology it isn't easy to find out who to vote for :/

    • @wojtek9675
      @wojtek9675 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@devluz im fine with going green but as long as we have something to fall back onto like nuclear or renewable but in he mean time we cant take such big strides to save the earth without making something to land on

    • @stevencooper4422
      @stevencooper4422 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Just vote for the candidate that promises more infrastructure, not less.

    • @w0mblemania
      @w0mblemania 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@stevencooper4422 That's often a very bad idea. Such politicians are often attached to property/infrastructure developers.
      For an example of how bad it can get: see the concreting of Japan.

  • @tFighterPilot
    @tFighterPilot 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1645

    It's like comparing airplanes to cars. More people die in car accidents than plane accidents per usage, but every plane accident is so large that it seems much more scary.

    • @sreejithnilamel5412
      @sreejithnilamel5412 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Woah

    • @nukecorruption
      @nukecorruption 3 ปีที่แล้ว +105

      also plane accidents are more scary because you can't do anything about it as a passenger, but for like driving a car you still have some control if getting into an accident

    • @offlineriders4199
      @offlineriders4199 3 ปีที่แล้ว +128

      @@nukecorruption you cant do much as passenger in car too

    • @nukecorruption
      @nukecorruption 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@offlineriders4199 true that but most of us drive a car vs flying a plane

    • @user-rm3mo1qf9b
      @user-rm3mo1qf9b 3 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      But you are still statistically safer in a plane than a car.

  • @oui3255
    @oui3255 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    nuclear waste vs carbon emissions is basically
    you can move nuclear waste safely way more easily than moving literal air

  • @Robert_McGarry_Poems
    @Robert_McGarry_Poems 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well made.
    Thank you for making this digestible.

  • @Cupapet93
    @Cupapet93 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1526

    It's just like how 50 years ago, people were afraid traveling with plane, even it's the safest transportation ever

    • @Horny_Fruit_Flies
      @Horny_Fruit_Flies 3 ปีที่แล้ว +250

      People are afraid of things they don't understand.

    • @723mostafaahmadaref7
      @723mostafaahmadaref7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      I'm afraid of planes just because the turbulence scares me

    • @skarflute7989
      @skarflute7989 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      *fastest

    • @adamthetired9319
      @adamthetired9319 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      "Most safe" or "safest".

    • @av1479
      @av1479 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Peoples get scared of what they don't understand.

  • @IkeaAds.com_BMD7
    @IkeaAds.com_BMD7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +502

    Anti nuclear People: Nuclear Energy is Bad for the Environment
    Kurzgesagt: *I’m about to ruin this guys whole career*

    • @veggiesupreme3556
      @veggiesupreme3556 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      I just don’t see the appeal in tearing apart our landscape in mining projects to construct solar panels and wind turbines and then laying them across the country side destroying the scenery and wildlife and then burying them in landfill as they are too complicated to be recycled. Don’t see the point in saving the climate if we’re not also saving the environment.

    • @benprickett8894
      @benprickett8894 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@veggiesupreme3556 By saving the climate we are saving the environment. If we were to just stop with our renewable energy efforts then wouldnt last another hundred years.

    • @jeremythomas4744
      @jeremythomas4744 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@veggiesupreme3556 climate and environment should come together, in this case nuclear and wind turbines would be the best solution. Whereas solar panels would take up too much space and ruin the looks of the environment

    • @beatlesfoxman9617
      @beatlesfoxman9617 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@benprickett8894 but if we relayed on the nuclear until the renewables are actually practical and efficient, we could save the environment, the climate and the human lives. There's no sensible argument against taking this route.

    • @normalcitizen_1
      @normalcitizen_1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@veggiesupreme3556 because the “save the climate” is a scam, if people wanted to get “carbon free” energy we would increase the construction of Nuclear reactors

  • @maxis_scott_engie_maximov_jr
    @maxis_scott_engie_maximov_jr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like the detail that the Monkey in the intro animation always holds something related to the topic of the video

  • @litensvardh415
    @litensvardh415 ปีที่แล้ว

    Same, info about storage would be amazing!

  • @theeleventhdoctor2043
    @theeleventhdoctor2043 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3167

    If you took the word “nuclear” out of nuclear power, then I’m pretty sure 90% of people would support it after hearing its statistics

    • @PlatinumAltaria
      @PlatinumAltaria 3 ปีที่แล้ว +780

      Just call it "magic rock power". How does it work? You put magic rocks in this fancy box and energy comes out.

    • @pablo450e
      @pablo450e 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      Hahah, so true!!

    • @libra8993
      @libra8993 3 ปีที่แล้ว +191

      dog whistles and trigger words that destroy logic and reason

    • @ex-32
      @ex-32 3 ปีที่แล้ว +306

      yes, pick something boring like "metal transmutational power generation" you just make power by turning one type of metal into another.

    • @roaringbeardragon4531
      @roaringbeardragon4531 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Exactly!

  • @CASHJohnny
    @CASHJohnny 3 ปีที่แล้ว +538

    So nuclear energy safety is just like the airplanes safety: we think they crash and kill a lot, but they actually dont; they are safer than the "usual ways"...

    • @crappymeal
      @crappymeal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +69

      .

    • @Arno18Production
      @Arno18Production 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      not taking into account the ecological impact of planes though 🙃

    • @danieljensen2626
      @danieljensen2626 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      @@Arno18Production I wouldn't be surprised if a plane carrying 100 people was actually better for the environment than 100 people driving their own cars though.

    • @jamespage6013
      @jamespage6013 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@danieljensen2626 It really isn't though unfortunately, keeping planes in the air is hugely fuel expensive. There's not much transport that can rival planes in pollutiveness per passenger :/

    • @birdsayshello
      @birdsayshello 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@danieljensen2626 facts

  • @petrholub2282
    @petrholub2282 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the video and your work 🙂
    I noticed misspelled Chernobyl ("Chernoybl") at 5:38, in case you sometime get back to the video

  • @mlq1718
    @mlq1718 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I feel like measuring the consequences of an event by deaths alone could be slightly misleading; Id like to know how many people had long-term illness or injuries, as well. Most places downplayed COVID deaths, but fully neglected the long-term cases and disabilities it caused.

    • @Jensenrobinb
      @Jensenrobinb ปีที่แล้ว

      that was in the video, they said “long term death toll”

  • @CHKNSkratch
    @CHKNSkratch 3 ปีที่แล้ว +631

    "let us kno-"
    "yes, I want a 3 season series on this"

    • @ayasakuu
      @ayasakuu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      my words

    • @ozAqVvhhNue
      @ozAqVvhhNue 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I'm just commenting so the youtube algorithm puts the comment to the very top.

    • @madness4321
      @madness4321 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      yes

    • @CHKNSkratch
      @CHKNSkratch 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ozAqVvhhNue thank you

    • @joco6825
      @joco6825 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Doing my part, want a series on this :D

  • @Happyface45678
    @Happyface45678 3 ปีที่แล้ว +739

    As a German, it really pisses me off that we have phased out nuclear energy in favour of brown coal (Braunkohle). It is so much more of an immediate, albeit less tangible danger. Had Chernobyl not happened, I think many more countries would be using nuclear power today

    • @SeeNickView
      @SeeNickView 3 ปีที่แล้ว +61

      Failure breeds creativity. Had Chernobyl not happened, would we have seen the flaws in previous designs? Yes and no, maybe!

    • @aurelia8028
      @aurelia8028 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      I'm not even from Germany, and it pisses me off aswell wtf are your politicians thinking?! Who voted those idiots in, lol

    • @Happyface45678
      @Happyface45678 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      @@aurelia8028 to be honest, they just did it in order to get reelected. There was a whole movement against nuclear energy before the turn of the century (that I wasn't alive for) that put a lot of pressure on them, apparently enough for them to crumble.

    • @Happyface45678
      @Happyface45678 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SeeNickView that's a valid point of course

    • @aouniw2733
      @aouniw2733 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@aurelia8028 it was because of big Public Demonstrations against atomic Energie (Atom? Nein danke). Many people are afraid of the atomic waste. Its the first thing people think about. Its Bad but there is alot of renewable Energy nowadays and rising, it could be worse. But shutting down all of the atomic reactors was worse than This new coal energy. The politicans hust folowed the Public opinion

  • @KBXCN
    @KBXCN 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    For anyone floating around here looking for information on nuclear waste for instance, the Kyle Hill video "We Solved Nuclear Waste Years Ago," I would recommend it.
    I'd love to see collaboration somehow between these two.

  • @TheKaimanguy
    @TheKaimanguy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Also the music for this video was PERFECT!

  • @MrEel-dc4kh
    @MrEel-dc4kh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +488

    Scientists: "Let's switch to nuclear for the time being until we can use renewables and fusion"
    Humanity: "Well yes, but actually no"

    • @blauwbeer556
      @blauwbeer556 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      If you think humanity is United and most of us agree that we should keep going with fossil fuels then you must be delusional.

    • @yusufshaikh4410
      @yusufshaikh4410 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@blauwbeer556 most of us cant care enough to do anything to be fair

    • @victuz
      @victuz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@yusufshaikh4410 But if we are to prosper in the future we have to make some collective efforts right now.

    • @Merthis_Real
      @Merthis_Real 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Brazil: what about hydropower?

    • @alexgonzales6883
      @alexgonzales6883 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yea then they try to politicize nuclear power like idiots.when it’s the clear cut answer

  • @omkakade69
    @omkakade69 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4222

    nuclear energy is like the old man from home alone that seems dangerous but is nice

    • @evankazmierczak8388
      @evankazmierczak8388 3 ปีที่แล้ว +245

      Hopefully the burglars represent fossil fuels

    • @alileevil
      @alileevil 3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      Yes until you realize that the nuclear waste needs disposal which is a million times more deadly than carbon dioxide.

    • @ultrafrost-2774
      @ultrafrost-2774 3 ปีที่แล้ว +514

      @@alileevil Until you realize that what you just said was false.

    • @norbert4571
      @norbert4571 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      someone's watched home alone one too many times

    • @spookyscarylamppost3431
      @spookyscarylamppost3431 3 ปีที่แล้ว +381

      @@alileevil
      I don't know man, burying some barrels of toxic waste sound way less dangerous rather than releasing deadly gases into the atmosphere.

  • @Alkalite
    @Alkalite ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I would like a more detailed discussion around the pros and cons of nuclear power as well as information on the storage of nuclear waste.

  • @janrickgerasmio5850
    @janrickgerasmio5850 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    As a phineas and ferb fan i'd like to point out a reference of doofenshmurgs building in. 4:24

    • @kenneth2shu935
      @kenneth2shu935 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      *hears the muffled jingle in the distance*

  • @zedbags
    @zedbags 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1740

    "Saving millions of lives should be something we can all agree on"
    It _should-_

    • @xmine08
      @xmine08 3 ปีที่แล้ว +89

      Mao has left the Chat

    • @reacttoyou9843
      @reacttoyou9843 3 ปีที่แล้ว +87

      @LongShot No, sadly not everyone agrees with that. There are many, in the USA especially that would rather see the few thrive and watch millions die. Mostly out of spite, greed, and religious reasons.

    • @latentspace
      @latentspace 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @LongShot Part of that’s true, but you can’t deny that throughout history there have always been people who couldn’t care less about the loss of human lives.

    • @notapokemontrainer800
      @notapokemontrainer800 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@magnussandstrom1853 nah, idk about religion. There's no rule in religion about energy production, let alone nuclear power. Opposition mostly come from greedy capitalists and other ignorant people.

    • @notapokemontrainer800
      @notapokemontrainer800 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@xmine08 lmao

  • @ahnafrafi2378
    @ahnafrafi2378 3 ปีที่แล้ว +864

    Germany : We are Evolving just backwards .

    • @vomm
      @vomm 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      Not really. This video is only about deaths. But there are other criteria, like nuclear energy is the most expensive, and if an accident happens, it will affect millions of peoples lifes in a densely populated country like Germany and will cost billions of euros. Also the atomic waste is an issue. The power from coal is temporarily, in some years or decades Germanys decision to close nuclear power plants coud be seen as a good one, when it's renewable energy sector is leading and it's produced power is green and cheap while other countries have problems to handle the prices and wars about uranium.

    • @TheNondiscriminatory
      @TheNondiscriminatory 3 ปีที่แล้ว +207

      @@vomm this is ridiculous or just wrong on all fronts. First of all, it's the most expensive precisely because of the ignorant public opinion about it, leading to constant litigation for attempts at building new plants from "green" groups, as well as an absurd amount of government regulation. Basically, it's only expensive because we've made it so.
      Secondly, pretty much every problem concerning safety and even toxic waste is solveable through innovation- and I'll go a step further and say it *has been solved.* Essentially, the IFR (integral fast reactors) solved both problems with a) being designed in such a way that it's literally impossible to meltdown (they demonstrated this- FOR REAL- in the late 80s), and b) making it integrated, meaning it recycles a large amount of it's spent fuel making it more efficient while simultaneously making it less toxic, getting rid of a ton of toxic waste. Because of this method, the toxic waste dangerous lifespan is reduced from potentially thousands of years to about 400 years. Which is amazing.
      So what happened to the IFR? Cancelled because of the moronic public. Basically, innovation that solves every problem you listed has been stifled by an ignorant government motivated by even more ignorant citizens. Hell, even now GE has developed a version of the IFR that could be in use today. But a lack of funding due to the fear and litigation and profitability has kept it from going online in mass.
      If we want a green future, we NEED nuclear to supplement green energy, if for nothing else, for the base load, and we can use IFR reactors that cannot meltdown to meet that need.

    • @BrumBrumBryn
      @BrumBrumBryn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +85

      @@vomm "the power from coal is temporarily" tell that to the 11000 people that have died prematurely because of it

    • @jeffjoestar4245
      @jeffjoestar4245 3 ปีที่แล้ว +59

      @@vomm he's talking about Germany closing their nuclear plants just to appease people who don't know shit and just cry "waaaah nuclear is bad, just look at chernobyl"

    • @reeveeakt7250
      @reeveeakt7250 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Me: laughs in Japanese

  • @Giblet12
    @Giblet12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You should do a video on how solar and wind power have a major problem compared to turbine-generated forms of power due to their low to non existent inertia. An entirely wind and solar powered grid would be much more unstable than other forms.

  • @gamerunit69
    @gamerunit69 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another video on nuclear power/ waste please I have always loved learning new and cool things and have always advocated positively for nuclear and I would love for more people to see and understand the benefits and not just the scary word "radiation"

  • @lordfeish1927
    @lordfeish1927 3 ปีที่แล้ว +677

    When we get around to building a Dyson sphere there gonna still be people who think coal is better

    • @i.g.304
      @i.g.304 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      xD

    • @Meboy-uv5td
      @Meboy-uv5td 3 ปีที่แล้ว +68

      people are gonna think that its eating the suns energy and we are all gonna die or something stupid

    • @SmartsmileGT
      @SmartsmileGT 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@Meboy-uv5td i mean, it is harnessing 100% of the suns energy and we are all going to die

    • @theoldfinalchapters8319
      @theoldfinalchapters8319 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      "The sun is flat"

    • @nielskorpel8860
      @nielskorpel8860 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Nevermind the complete disruption of the entire solar system and all those who live in it. Grandiose humanity needs to be grandiose.
      Ok ill be less nasty. I am not sure we should build a dyson sphere, just because we can. The only reason i can see is that we would ‘need’ it, given our exponential growth in energy demand. The thing with exponential growth is, though, that we will NEVER be satisfied, not even if we grow. And that makes me look at the practical value of building a dyson sphere much less positively.

  • @JarlRagnaar
    @JarlRagnaar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +410

    Sadly, many people hear 'nuclear' and immediately discard any potential benefits, because it's 'too dangerous due to radiation' without even understanding the basics

    • @marcrolf7640
      @marcrolf7640 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Hi, I'm a physicist, so I know "the basics". Which is why I do not support nuclear fission.

    • @30035XD
      @30035XD 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thankfully so. Not all of us are trigger happy idiots like yourself and would rather avoid doomsday like catastrophes if we can.

    • @highlander723
      @highlander723 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can thank Greenpeace and the Antinuclear Environmentist.

    • @gavinperch9413
      @gavinperch9413 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@marcrolf7640 If not I get it but I would like to know what about nuclear power concerns you most. I've always been of the position that nuclear power seems to be reasonably safe especially in comparison to fossil fuels and statistically safer compared to renewables. I have an open mind to your position so if you're willing to tell me it wont go wasted.

    • @meddlmann
      @meddlmann 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's really sad, I feel like that is one of the main reasons why my (the german) government pushes so hard against nuclear power. The "Atomkraft Nein Danke" movement was really harmful for the switch to cleaner and sustainable energy.

  • @bbascio
    @bbascio ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4:25
    i wasn't expecting to see dr. doofenshmirz's evil inc. in a video about nuclear energy

    • @franzicoy
      @franzicoy ปีที่แล้ว

      Which building?

    • @bbascio
      @bbascio ปีที่แล้ว

      the one with the weirdest design

  • @apcometri1919
    @apcometri1919 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The problem is these death stats are based on annual figures. But the problem is when something goes wrong with nuclear it goes very wrong and can kill many for many years

    • @frederikschulp
      @frederikschulp 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      but still it is way safer, and with new technology and rules for building them it is basically impossible for this to happen.

  • @obiomachukwuocha4918
    @obiomachukwuocha4918 3 ปีที่แล้ว +614

    Think about it like this: we are used to fossil fuel deaths. Those deaths are consistent every year and we accept it as reality. BUT nuclear deaths happen every 14+ years and I'm reality the the most worrisome nuclear disasters are even more rare. A 50 yr old would have seen 2 nuclear disasters and would think that nuclear is bad. But that same man would not notice the constant fossil fuel deaths around him

    • @djaux4929
      @djaux4929 3 ปีที่แล้ว +71

      Like said in the video, our brain is not capable of noticing slow changes. Plus coal deaths are indirect and similar to some non-coal deaths while radiation isn't. This is probably the reason it's so demonized

    • @raidynmorian4518
      @raidynmorian4518 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      When something is common and a seemingly unstoppable problem, people see it more as a force of nature than an active decision to sacrifice those people. But with nuclear energy, it's seen as an active choice to kill people that, if we didn't use it, could be avoided.

    • @samthompson3714
      @samthompson3714 3 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      Precisely. See: people are terrified of planes but don't think twice about driving their car (and half of them driving with like 20 distractions).

    • @irmaosmatos4026
      @irmaosmatos4026 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      well, the major problem is all about dealocate people.

    • @jamesdinius7769
      @jamesdinius7769 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      It's like an example I heard of with cigarettes. Imagine if cigarettes were perfectly safe, but some were replaced with a stick of dynamite that violently blew the smokers' head off. The number replaced is such that the annual death toll of smoking is the same as reality. The same number of people are dying, but the outcry in this scenario would be enormous. The deaths are shocking, obvious, and not concentrated on the elderly (who's deaths are viewed as more acceptable, since old people die anyway, nihilistic I know, but that's how human psychology works).

  • @GuidoHaverkort
    @GuidoHaverkort 3 ปีที่แล้ว +437

    What the title says: "How many people did nuclear energy kill?"
    What the title means: "Why we should use nuclear energy"

    • @elessar4864
      @elessar4864 3 ปีที่แล้ว +110

      That's to trick nuclear-sceptics into watching it.

    • @Ra.vanZon
      @Ra.vanZon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      @@elessar4864 didn't they do this for Vaccination as well?

    • @kevinhowe543
      @kevinhowe543 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@Ra.vanZon yyyyyep

    • @SvenSan
      @SvenSan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      That's "Kurzgesagt - In a Nutshell" in a nutshell :D

    • @user-hk5fo1nm9h
      @user-hk5fo1nm9h 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That’s a really shitty way to engage with people.

  • @Nic6Steinwand
    @Nic6Steinwand 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    would love a full video about the debate between renewables and nuclear!

  • @randomcrapstudios8398
    @randomcrapstudios8398 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ignorance, ignorance is the biggest danger to mankind.

  • @fancyobsession1803
    @fancyobsession1803 3 ปีที่แล้ว +392

    Killing millions slowly: Yes.
    Killing a few quickly: Hell no.
    Such a world we live in...

    • @infinity5288
      @infinity5288 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      who hired politicians who didn't even go to school

    • @CaptainPineapples
      @CaptainPineapples 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @@infinity5288 we did when we voted them in

    • @melanch0lycat5393
      @melanch0lycat5393 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      Human history is full of red herrings, and unfortunately the average human can't grasp long term consequences (I'm talking decades or millennia).
      If you think about it, tons of people dying quickly in a short amount of time is practically a beacon for attention, while something that takes time can easily slip under the radar

    • @rafaysyed520
      @rafaysyed520 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@infinity5288 has nothing to do with politicians being educated and everything to do with money and power and greed. Politicians aren't idiots, they know what they're doing. Everything they do is based off of their appeal to their voters and how they can make money. Politicians in favour of fossil fuels obviously know the risks and negative impact, but they continue to support them because they personally make easy profit from its success. And a combination of them whipping their voter base into supporting them on the topic, and their voter base demanding the politicians support the topic, creates a positive feedback loop of more and more deep rooted support and propagation of these industries and policies.

    • @darkfrost904
      @darkfrost904 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Think about it. I lived for 23 years. Spent great time in school, have a good family, working in a stable job. I would very much rather continue dying for long than everything be taken away from me in an instant through a nuclear catastrophe. Most people think of the same.

  • @lePerseus
    @lePerseus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +453

    Conclusion: Everything is better than fossile Fuels!

    • @LazyLifeIFreak
      @LazyLifeIFreak 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Everything/anything is better than fossil fuels.

    • @filip9564
      @filip9564 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Slave energy

    • @personexistingnot
      @personexistingnot 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hecking energy

    • @notchbeard9007
      @notchbeard9007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Still unclear how we get lubricants, plastics, fertilizers and waxes from solar...

    • @aetheriox463
      @aetheriox463 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@notchbeard9007 the electricity produced from solar panels is used to produce them. its not the sun itself producing them or people using light to, if it was then we would have way, way more plastic issues.

  • @newpurview
    @newpurview ปีที่แล้ว

    My kids really love watching your videos. Please make more videos on this topic. Thank you!

  • @therealpop1393
    @therealpop1393 ปีที่แล้ว

    not gonna lie, i love you in a nutshell, the video and sources helped alot for my science assignment

    • @ilikewoIves
      @ilikewoIves 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      bro didn't want to spell that monstrosity of a german word.

  • @tomdudley625
    @tomdudley625 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1650

    "let us know if you would like a complete video about it" - My video conveniently froze here so I could type this to say YES MAKE A VIDEO!!

    • @technoraver99
      @technoraver99 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      some ideas for a better planet
      Matthew 5: 27-28
      “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
      Luke 17:1
      And he said to his disciples, “Temptations to sin are sure to come, but woe to the one through whom they come!
      better stop producing / uploading / watching "music videos".. (or similar videos, pics, profile pictures, thumbnails, title names, headlines, usernames + harmful comments, bad words, swearing, lies, disrespect, harmful lyrics etc! on social media + everywhere else too.
      "Temptations to sin" / seduction etc. must stop)
      start deleting? censoring etc.?
      destroy your smartphones, cams, data storage devices etc? would be better.
      remove temptations / seduction + other evil things from TV, magazines, radio stations, broadcasting etc? would be better.
      many young people are watching those videos (or reading / typing harmful comments, or doing other bad things!) etc. all over the world. and its NOT ok!
      parents? (or people in authority): intervene?! seriously
      wait.. there is more:
      harmful drawings / comics / animations etc, clothing / styles / hairstyles / behaviour, facial expressions, gestures, dancemoves, acting, exercises, sports etc.
      harmful things in video games, news, reports, interviews, vlogs / blogs, tutorials, movies, series, trailers, entertainment shows, video productions! (+ backgrounds + surroundings), books, art, artworks, calendars, posters, business flyers, catalogues, leaflets, packagings, stickers etc. (words, speeches (+ voice types, vocal color etc), music, sounds, visuals, references! etc.)
      harmful things in stores and online shops, advertisements + advertising, commercials...
      + better stop online dating and other harmful things!
      maybe..
      support ocean or river! clean up organizations? (i think it is of high importance) (in india, pakistan, africa etc)
      + support animal welfare (animal shelters (money for food or new fluffy dog beds? blankets?, small fluffy carpets? (+ washing machines?), pet vitamin supplements, + pet supplies (dog toothbrushes?), pet toys, dog hairbrush? (parasites!) bath towels?, medical checks, dental care? / nail, paw care? etc. pet heating pads? heated dog houses? (for winter or in cold areas), pet cooling mats / pads (on hot days, summer), diesel powered portable generators? (outdoor electric power generation) (to run vacuum cleaners, washing machines etc), solar lamps?, transport vehicles, maintenance work + other improvements, additional staff + volunteers, more safety, beautifications? etc. topiary??
      + animal rescue ? (dog rescue projects in india?), animal hospitals?? (in poor countries or districts) or homeless people in your area? (btw governments should help these people! seriously. fast / adequate / individual support?!)
      support some of them?
      as an act of goodwill.
      + always be careful: corona etc!
      or become a firefighter, volunteer firefighter (+ driver? (pump operator), paramedic or ER doctor? ER nurse? ambulatory care? or shuttle service? (for people with disabilities)
      + be cautious: corona, hepatitis, tuberculosis etc!
      become an instructor? (fire and rescue?, emergency medical services?, advanced driving techniques?, advanced first aid?, psychological first aid?, wound care management!? + preventions (decubitus!, contractures!, thrush!, periodontitis!, loneliness?? etc) (nursing homes / home care / hospitals etc. + training seminars for employees) + hygienics?, high angle rescue techniques?, first aid for pets?, basic pet care?, junior firefighter programs?)
      start reading medical books? (anatomy? / physiology? / ECG interpretation? / EMS (paramedic books?) or nursing books? or blood banking and transfusion medicine? or dental engineering? medical or rescue engineering? medical dictionary? (illustrated)
      become a dog trainer? (rescue dogs, avalanche rescue dogs, therapy dogs) education? + watch out! dogs, cats etc. can transmit / spread corona!
      become an animal rescuer or animal doctor? + watch out! CORONA! (protection, safety measures etc)
      caution! they say: Coronaviruses are zoonotic, meaning they are transmitted between animals and people!
      maybe... plant a tree? many trees? a walnut tree?? in a park, garden or backyard?
      a walnut tree = food source (for birds etc) + oxygen generator.
      + provide water for animals in summer? fresh water source? or bird bath?
      or food? (daily? or several times a week?)
      use checklists to improve efficiency?
      snowy days? become a snowplow driver? (volunteer?)
      or towing service worker?
      or pharmaceutical supplier?
      + be cautious: corona!
      new technologies + other cool things:
      Far-UVC light (222nm) efficiently and safely inactivates airborne human coronaviruses?? (+ flu virus and many other?)
      do research? progress? + installations? (in offices, busses, trains, restrooms, elevators, classrooms, corridors, stairwells, hospitals etc?) .. could save lives.
      + improve immune systems? (food nutrients?)
      + portable plexiglass virus shields? (for counters, offices, workplaces, waiting rooms, buses, trains, passenger cabins etc) + air purifiers? (with HEPA filter)
      + limit the number of customers in stores, shopping malls, buses etc?, keep distance + distance floor markings?, + keep windows / vehicle windows wide! open for ventilation?
      + stay at home?
      amazing tools for rescue workers: portable hydraulic StrongArm (r) for firefighters etc.
      ( jawsoflife com ), hands free thermal vision (in mask imaging system), in mask heat vision (temperature display etc) or c-thru technology.
      + there are more amazing tools!
      high rise rescue solution? SPARS parachute rescue system? ( cosmic-rs com )
      fireproof clothing? + fire escape hoods?! (fire escape hoods and fire escape masks are designed to help you to escape from a burning building. each of these fire escape masks and hoods allows you 15 ? minutes to flee through the toxic gases / smoke)
      smoke detectors with LCD display?, CO detectors?, fire blankets?, fire extinguisher? (+ fireproof clothing, cap, gloves, safety glasses etc?) (+ fire extinguisher selection chart?)
      fire suppression systems? smoke extraction? fire protective coatings? (or anti corrosion?), seat belt cutter? useful gift idea? for family or friends etc. (or useful teaching books etc)
      support fire and rescue departments / services in poor countries or districts? (new helmet lamps, safety clothing + shoes, new equipment, fire escape hoods,
      thermal monitoring? (thermal vision will help you to track down a fire's source and smouldering fires in dark. glowing embers as well as fire hot-spots can be detected and fighted very fast and efficiently! + mobile infrared cameras could detect hidden hotspots or locate people in smoke-filled buildings),
      first responder kits etc. / communication devices (wearing! portable radios), new vehicles? a turntable ladder?? training verhicles? new motorcycles? (+ customizable / agility / more efficiency, + difficult terrain / crowded areas etc),
      new firefighter / rescue helicopters? (certain areas)
      new reanimation boards (for nursing homes / hospitals etc), new lifters? (patient transfer solutions), protection equipment / protective gear (corona), medical oxygen??, ventilators?, AEDs + first responder kits, pulse oximeters, diagnostic penlights, glucometers? (+ strips), + various batteries (or battery charger?), blood pressure cuffs, stethoscopes, weight scales, label machines? (for clothing or other personal things), rescue blankets?, stifneck collars?, thermometers, neck pillows, heating pads / cooling packs (or aspirators + tubes, IV poles, (+ IV (intravenous) nutrition), breath exercisers, electric shavers!, nail clippers!, glasses cleaning cloths, non-slip socks! and many other good things + health care products (high quality products?) etc, compression bandages, medical dressing (+ anti pressure sores (decubitus!) elbow / heel protectors / pads / comfort cushions etc), CPR training simulators?, disposable ambu bags?, new rollators + replacement parts (+ hip protectors etc), wheelchairs + replacement parts (footrests, leg rest, headrest + cushion, armrest pads + comfort pillows?, cushion pads etc. to prevent pressure sores!), gel pads for shoes + back heel pads etc (+ improved skin inspections?! + treatment + reports + regular checks (+ photo documentation? with digital camera (disease / wound / injury processes! etc), anti decubitus air mattress for additional prevention?, + prevent hand contractures? (hand / wrist / finger splints?, hand therapy ball exercises?), auxiliary eating spoon and fork? (stroke hemiplegia rehabilitation training) comfort grips cutlery? (great for parkinson / disabled, suffering with tremors and trembling hands etc), medical alert system solutions?, own phones for all employees? (more efficiency / more safety), electric armchairs (more comfort), ergotherapy? (useful + less loneliness! + caution: corona!), water dispensers (less dehydration) (+ caution: edema / pulmonary edema / other diseases etc.), outdoor corner sofa + table? (garden, terrace / + all weather proof) + electric awning?, lighting solutions? + cool floor / garden lamps? (solar?, waterproof), teamwork + helping each other? (+ watchfulness, attentiveness, helpfulness, care, + honesty, accuracy, + giving helpful tips / hints, + politeness, being thankful, being focused), + preventing back injuries? (employees! / patients) (lift and carry properly. (+ teamwork? / use tools and aids?) + gymnastic exercises for a strong back?, (+ protect (treat carefully) your joints, elbows, kneecaps etc! + your nerves!), + energy and resource saving concepts?, tasty / healthy food? (+ additional: instant soups?, ready meals?, canned foods? for hungry employees / night shift etc), (+ vegan cooking books? give it a try? at home?)
      + other improvements, beautifications, more safety, comfort etc. + spreading good mood? (less sadness etc) (+ please be careful: corona!)

    • @franzferdinand2240
      @franzferdinand2240 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@technoraver99 look dude, spam does not help change the public's views, we just hate it.

    • @MewPurPur
      @MewPurPur 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @watch Earthlings documentary be an activist At least spam this in appropriate places. We're tryna discuss nuclear here

    • @Isosto
      @Isosto 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Indeed

    • @pencilRC1
      @pencilRC1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@MewPurPur yeah, we don’t want religion class

  • @salted3507
    @salted3507 3 ปีที่แล้ว +568

    "How many did nuclear energy kill?"
    Welp, definitely not godzilla

    • @DarrensGeneralInfo
      @DarrensGeneralInfo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      *Please view my vid about the Bhopal gas disaster.. It is about a disaster which occured in Bhopal, India in the year 1984 due to the leak of Methyl Isocyanate gas. I've explained each and every thing briefly in that vid*

    • @waddledeeznutz6477
      @waddledeeznutz6477 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      giant dino go brrrr

    • @ind0266
      @ind0266 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@DarrensGeneralInfo omg stop. Stop advertising on others. People will come, but not if you self advertise.

    • @guccibanana0910
      @guccibanana0910 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@DarrensGeneralInfo dude stop spamming

    • @Destro65
      @Destro65 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@DarrensGeneralInfo Stop self advertising.
      Nobody cares about your useless video.

  • @dimitrivarias8914
    @dimitrivarias8914 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    At 4:24 is Doofenshmirtz evil inc

  • @Samantha-vlly
    @Samantha-vlly ปีที่แล้ว +2

    At this point, I want this channel to build a science school.

  • @itwasinthispositionerinoag7414
    @itwasinthispositionerinoag7414 3 ปีที่แล้ว +490

    Nuclear energy has killed an astronomical amount of hypothetical cats, last time I checked anyway...

    • @jrbcodes
      @jrbcodes 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Smartest comment so far

    • @squeaksquawk4255
      @squeaksquawk4255 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@infiniteinformation2689 How is this relevant?

    • @adithyaadi1363
      @adithyaadi1363 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I like nuclear but nuclear mining can kill good number of people i think

    • @alonelyperson6031
      @alonelyperson6031 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@squeaksquawk4255 It's random.

    • @AnanyaGoyal7
      @AnanyaGoyal7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi ... Captures Captures

  • @emrekizilirmak3486
    @emrekizilirmak3486 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    bro put doofenschmirtz tower at 4:23 💀

  • @hulkster0422
    @hulkster0422 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What I would like to see is also the comparison of operating costs including damage control after accident. I've heard that cleanup activities after Chernobyl disaster put such a big strain on soviet union economy that it was one of main reasons of its collapse. I wonder whether there is any truth to it

  • @frikkthoen
    @frikkthoen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +136

    The fact that Germany have closed 11 reactors and plan to close the remaining 6 pisses me off so fucking much.

    • @Misha-dr9rh
      @Misha-dr9rh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      Goddamnit germany, this is the THIRD FUCKING TIME you've done something stupid that impacts all of humanity.

    • @ingydegmar2060
      @ingydegmar2060 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Also, that big new gas pipe from Russia in a time where we know for a fact fossil fuels will be our demise at this rate.
      Mind blowing, really.

    • @EnigmacTheFirst
      @EnigmacTheFirst 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@Misha-dr9rh My counter on Germany's sins is much higher than 3

    • @owlofminerva1397
      @owlofminerva1397 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Sad thing: There is almost no major party you can vote that opposes this plan. Only FDP and AFD oppose rapidly shutting down nuclear power plants and one of which can't be taken seriously.

    • @admiralmudkip9836
      @admiralmudkip9836 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Misha-dr9rh I can only think of 2, this and ww2, what are the others?

  • @hugopnik3380
    @hugopnik3380 3 ปีที่แล้ว +285

    Germany's energy solutions are evolving, just backwards

    • @victuz
      @victuz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      And yet they are almost always in the top 10 countries when it comes to innovation. Strange isn't it?

    • @VelkanfromEM
      @VelkanfromEM 3 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      @@victuz And first in pollution in EU

    • @stephank9172
      @stephank9172 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @@victuz those are two unrelated things but nice comparison. And yea, germany shouldnt have phased out nuclear earlier than coal just because a reactor had an accident half way across the world

    • @hailgiratinathetruegod7564
      @hailgiratinathetruegod7564 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@victuz well, our politicians had terrible ideas, from the problematic green movement. Our Mittelstand is creating the pogress.

    • @carholic-sz3qv
      @carholic-sz3qv 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@VelkanfromEM with the TÜV I'll say you're wrong.

  • @matisseronot6017
    @matisseronot6017 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Except for a slightly misleading title compared to the actual content of the video, very informative stuff as always, brilliantly animated and explained with clear data, objectivity and visual animation. Love it, share it, fund it and just enjoy... in a nutshell ^^

  • @roguer4943
    @roguer4943 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I think it would be very beneficial to look into nuclear energy, if we could create nuclear power without nuclear waste then we would never have to worry about this again. Nuclear is also a lot safer now