S&W 686+ Still The Best Gun? Colt Python vs S&W 686+ Detailed Comparison!...Inside & Out!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 มิ.ย. 2024
- Support TYMPPP by Buying Official TYMPPP Merch!
yankees-swag-bag-bonanza.mysh...
Totally NOT a Backup Channel for TYMP!!!
/ @theyankeegearhead
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @theyankeemarshal
This channel and TYMP Pistol Project are both fully viewer supported. No Sponsors Allowed!
Please help by becoming a patron.
/ theyankeemarshal
Subscribestar Link
www.subscribestar.com/theyanke...
Original score: Madison Stegall
Super Artwork: Daniel Greenfield - บันเทิง
![주호 - 비가오면 [원곡_캔] cover by 방쏭](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yOppXUKqEVo/mqdefault.jpg)
The Colt doesn’t lock up on the ejector rod, because the cylinder turns clockwise. Unlike the S&W that needs that additional lock up as it turns counter clockwise. The hand is trying to push the cylinder open every time you index it on the S&W.
Good observation..
AAAhhh... now I get it! excellent observation! cheers!
And so does this help with the Colt's accuracy?... This is what I've heard, at least. 🐍 My Cobra is very accurate for a 2" snubby; surprisingly so! 😃
The ejector rod also has a reverse thread on the Smith to counter the tendency for it to loosen "As the Cylinder Turns"
Thank you SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO MUCH for actually showing the internals. I don't have a Colt to examine next to my Smiths, and it's been rough trying to find a video showing exactly what you did.
When I was much younger my Dad had a late 70's State Police S&W Model 66 4" 6-shot .357 Magnum that would give any Colt Python a run for it's money. You can tell that gun was built with hand selected parts and additional attention to detail was giving on fitment, hand tuning/action/lockup etc etc. The requisition and purchase order going to a State Police Department as one of their duty guns pulled some strings and set a fire under the master craftsman of that era who built that gun. I've never seen one as good or like it since. It was laser accurate and shot dead on POA/POI as well. You couldn't miss with it and the trigger was so buttery smooth as well as the action and timing were impeccable as perfect as perfect gets. It had our State Police insignia shield engraved on the side plate cover. Dad left one of our friends talk him out of it somewhere during the early 90's.....1991-92 maybe? Can't remember the exact year but it was stupid...stupid...stupid. I lost Dad in 2022 at the age of 81 and I'm sure he wished we had that gun back even today and now. That was one you would want to be buried with....trust me!
I wish the gun press would still do their 10,000 round torture tests - This time with comparable revolvers from Colt, S&W, and Ruger. Expensive- but it would be fun to see or read about.
Torture the gun or the shooter?
When I first joined the U. S. Customs Service I was issued a 686. It had a small 'csa' marking on the frame indicating that is was a purchase by Customs. Later we transitioned to the 6906 and they offered to sell us our 686's for $200 if we wanted to keep them. I didn't buy mine because the semi-autos were coming into vogue but I now regret that decision.
Our agency toyed with the idea of buying the 686 but cheaped out and got the 64. The budget geeks won that battle. When our agency switched to the Beretta 92, the Model 10 and 64 revolvers were sold to the deputies for $150 each. I bought my own 64 and a snubbie Model 10 round butt belonging to some administrative type who probably never shot it. I have never regretted these purchases.
It's the reissued 2020 Python for me. I invested in three of them, and never looked back.
@jeffkendel1570
Actually, I couldn't care less whether they do or not. I will certainly get my money's worth out of them. They will more than serve the purpose for which I purchased them.
I think OP is using the word investing to mean "making sure he allways has it avalible in good operating condition" not investing as growth of monetary value.@@jeffkendel1570
@flyinfr33domfreedom2
I don't buy firearms to sell or trade. They are one of my collectible hobbies that I "invest" in time, money, and study for my personal use and enjoyment. Basses, watches, and cigars, also fit that category
I am blessed to have the resources, financial and otherwise necessary, to "invest" in my personal interests without having to liquidate any property in order to pursue them. To each their own... O.P.
@@jeffkendel1570
Good for you. Like I said, to each their own.
I have both a 5" S&W 686+ and 4.25" Python as well as a 6" S&W 629 and an 8" Anaconda and I couldn't have articulated my thoughts on it any better than this video. The 686 and 629 are great shooters but the Python and Anaconda are literal works of art. The fit and finish of the Colts are just fantastic and the double action triggers are buttery smooth.
Gotta love colt 😎
I picked up a S&W 625. The crane allowed to much movement. Never had that problem with all my Colts. My Blackhawk could handle massive loads but the details were lacking. Colts are much more accurate. New Frontier 45 Colt, Diamondback 22, Trooper MkV, Trooper Mk3, Lawman Mk3, Challenger 4", Challenger 6".
It never crossed my mind to be curious of a comparison between a Python and a 686. However, I watched your video all the way through because you did a great job of it, lol.
Me over here staring at the S&W 686 Plus I bought after years of listening to Yank tell me it's the best handgun ever made....
And it still is...
@@TheYankeeMarshalbesides the Glock 😎
@@TheYankeeMarshal Yeah, I made the comment before the video was completely finished. It definitely felt like it was leaning in a different direction! 😆
My grandad was a cop in OKC in the 40's, 50's, & 60's. I asked him one time: "Grandad, do you prefer the Colt or a Smith & Wesson?" He said Smith. I asked "why?" He said (no shit, this is what he said): "when you hit somebody over the head with a Colt, it bends the barrel." Not so with the S&W. Granted, that was like 70 years ago. Times have changed.
Barrel, no!
Extractor rod, yes!
Common worry of police of days gone by, including my dad, was bending that extractor rod.
Every cop at one time or another got to see a dropped colt made inoperable by a bent extractor rod
@@99dsm1 My grandad said barrel.
@@chrisnedbalek2866 he mis spoke. Even 70 years ago the barrel profile on a 357 made with the lowest quality steel will enter someone’s skull before it bends. Did he also say he executed him with a pistol whip?
The colt definitely looks like it’s better
Forged vs cast
Just my opinion but the S&W has a more natural point of aim to it. It’s so right on, and accurate, I’ve never loved another revolver quite like I love the 686.
That’s just me.
My 686+ just “points” perfectly. I’ve only handled a Colt Anaconda so I do not have a fair comparison to Python.
Lots of good choices out there 😎
This may be your best video ever.
Its a good one 😎
Maaaaaan....I just told my wife I was done buying revolvers (Old School Pinned and Recessed S&Ws) and you have to go show me, in detail why the Colt works so well. Fire up gunnbroker.
Pinned and recessed are still one of my favorites.
I still regret selling my S&W 19-4 Pinned and recessed 4"
Learned my lesson.
Still have my favorite Model 27 5" Pinned Recessed with 3 t's
Target hammer, Target trigger and target grips.
My favorite writer Skeeter Skelton's favorite handgun so I had to have one
Get you a colt 😎
Get Both in each Barrel length!
Because this is 'merica!
But you must have at least one S&W model 27 pinned and recessed. A truly Iconic beautiful revolver.
If you have lots of $$ buy an original Registered S&W Three Fifty Seven Magnum!
1 point missed on the Colt is they use a 1 piece barrel, unlike the Smith, which uses a barrel shroud
The 686 does not have a barrel Shroud.. Only the 66 and the 69 does.
@miked8009 that is correct, I stand corrected. My memory is good, but it's short haha
I have a 4 inch python and a 4 inch 686+. Which one I carry honestly depends on if I’m carrying around my toddler. See he likes to hug my leg directly under my revolver (OWB carry at 3 o’clock). Now I know the internal mechanisms prevent any sort of accidental discharge, but I still feel safer cowboy carrying with a hammer down on an empty chamber when around my kid. Thus… around my kid I carry the 686+ with 6 rounds and when I’m alone I carry the python with 6 rounds.
Next we want model 27 vs 4 inch blued python
Or Raquel Welch vs Ann Margaret
One MASSIVE crucial difference, is that "new press fit" firing pin & spring on the 2020 Python which makes it impossible to change out except sending it back to Colt... when they one day stop servicing this gun and those parts need replacements, well, you're SOL and it's a $1499+ paperweight lol...🥴
Outstanding video, Yankee. No one does as good a job of making informative videos as you.
In other news, today the youtuber The Yankee Marshall was maimed when he was attacked by seven werewolves. He was able to down 6 of them, but ran out of ammo for the last one.
686 Plus the plus means 7 Rounds Tactical Timmy
Yes you’re right but Yankee carries the Colt so Gunslinger is also correct.
Actually, when the seventh one saw how fast and efficiently the Colt Python completely annihilated his buddies, he took off. Rumor has it he is still terrorizing the next village today. Everybody there thought the seven shot 686 was a better option... not even with silver bullets.
Revolvers reload so slow! 🐌
@@dancruze Only for those who don't train,it does not take long at all to get the speed up, people have just become lazy with the convenance of semi Autos, that's the whole problem with everything people want convenance, to lazy to put the work in , convenance has made far to many people soft.
You got the right idea just buy both of them
Always buy both if you can!
Yankee, this was one of your best (IMHO) presentations. I wish you would do more side by side comparisons (within the same class firearm) as the points you often bring up may not hit home for some of us still getting our feet wet beyond SA revolvers.
I prefer Smiths over Colts, personally. They're both fine revolvers, but the S&Ws are just preferable to me for a few minor reasons. I own about a dozen of them or more in various calibers, and the only colts I have are SAAs.
Excellent side by side comparison. COLT has far better fit, finish, style and details. You get what you pay for. I tested Colt Python, Ruger GP100 v S&W 686. Trigger of the S&W was horrid. Could've been a poor quality control example, but it was very bad. Ruger trigger staged very well. Python was smooth, incredible. Great video.
I bought a 686 a few years back just because I couldnt afford the new Python. I love both, but I cant bring myself to part with my 686 now that I have had some time with it. I have always liked both revolvers and one day I'll have a Python to go along with my 686. As far as Im concerned, ya cant go wrong with either.
Spot on Yank!
Owning both for the win.
A serrated trigger is a no go for me. I hate how it feels, especially when shooting fast.
I would pay more for the Colt Python 2020 version. In fact I would power up and get the Colt Anaconda.
I've got a '86 4" Python. My friend has a 686 & I like it alot. Throw a Ruger Security Six in the mix & hit the range🤪
I love my 686+. It’s a butt kicking piece, it looks nice, has a good reputation and NEVER lets me down. It’s simply personal preference .
Thanks for the vid, glad I chose the 686+
Not a fan of any 7 shot revolver. That said the smith 7 shot cylinder can withstand more pressure of the same diameter 6 shot. The bolt stop cylinder notch is in between charge bores. Big difference.
Great info,thanks
Id like to see full breakdown of why yankee prefers taurus over charter arms. 🤔
Best budget revolver.
I prefer the Taurus over a charter also
Me too
😅 He'd have to get Dan to loan him some since he doesn't have either of those brands.
@@whelper4231at the end of the day, spending more and just getting a ruger is a better answer. 😎
@@dancruze Maybe, but Ruger doesn't have a true small frame metal gun. The SP101 is a "little tank," so if you want an inexpensive small frame, you can go foreign with a Brazilian (I guess all of those are under Taurus now?), or domestic with a Charter.
Excellent review Yankee.
My lasting memory of my issue 686 is the scar on my right index finger that I received during timed qualifications thirty five years ago. Upon ejecting empty cases the ejector over-rode a case rim and I hurriedly pried it out with my fingers, and the ejector cut a deep gash in my finger ... The scar is a nice conversation starter though.
I thoroughly enjoyed this review and in-depth contrast and compare. I love getting deeply detailed and technical.
Watching this reminded me of a 2017 comparison on the 686 vs GP100. The shooters found the trigger on the Smith smooth and heavier than the GP100 (2.9lbs) with no "stacking" and they never knew a leaf spring to break regarding reliability.
I have a 586 6" . Locks up perfect and very accurate.
Great video👍
My combat elite might be my favorite revolver
Right on. I wish I had one!
You can't compare a Python and a 686. MAYBE a Performance Center 686. Maybe. The Python is the Colt flagship revolver, top of their line with all that entails. The 686 is the Smith medium frame production gun, the equivalent of a King Cobra, NOT a Python.
The Colt King Cobra is the equivalent of the S&W 686. I'm deciding on which one of these to purchase. What do You suggest?
@@seveglider8406 The 686. Trigger job is easy, parts and accessories are everywhere and you can buy ammo with the money you save.
@@lenzielenski3276 Thank You!
This video couldn’t have been timed more perfectly. I have had a python and just recently bought a 686+. Now I really want a gp100 talo (model 1782)
Hard to beat a GP100. They are really strong and over built.
I have several GP 100s. The Lipsey's Wiley Clapp 3" GP100 makes a great carry gun you don't have to worry about hurting it.
There's also a 10mm version. But they are hard to find.
I love my Pythons, but there is no handgun that I shoot better than my old 686+. Unfortunately, it's a little heavy for every day carry, so that job goes to a 7-shot 386 Mountain Lite. The L-frames are awesome revolvers.
The Clinton lock settled it for me. Definitely take the Colt
It's the Hillary hole 😅
THANK YOU for this
The reason why the Smith is better as a carry is simply the internals. I own lots of both and if i were to just have one to show off, it would be the Colt. But to carry? The reason why Colts are so expensive is because the internals are complicated and need to be highly refined. and to be honest not efficient. The Smith internals are very efficient and very simple. Anyone can get a smith to a 6# double action trigger pull with a stone, polishing it, and spring kit without the dreaded light primer strikes. The Smith internals are so efficient people can only copy. Colts need a long trigger pull and you still can’t get them under 7.5#-8 without running into light primer strikes. Colts come with highly polished internals and non mim parts. They have to, the way the trigger works it needs that to even come close to a Smith with mim parts, machine marks, and extra heavy springs straight from the factory. With smith the trigger pull is short, the rebound is great, and the leverage is outstanding and efficient for the hammer spring weight. You pay $899 for a crewed Smith that’s at that point on par with a Colts trigger but after 1hr and a $30 spring kit you have something the Colt can never be. If you want to drop in a Power custom trigger and hammer, you’re still cheaper than the Colt and now rival Korth, Spohr and Man’s. There’s a reason why the best revolvers in the world copy smith’s. Yes the Colts smooth and it’s great out the box. But it’s maxed out and to complicated and the rebound design and Trigger leverage is horrendous. Pretty tho and feels special. Even if someone comes on and says “i got mine down to 6# without light primer strikes” um, no you didn’t and the pull is still longer and the rebound still sucks.
The Colt trigger is better. The S&W cylinder release is superior (IMO, feel free to disagree). Seven rounds is better than six. I'll go with the 686, but I admit that I haven't spent much time (maybe 50 rounds, it wasn't my firearm) with the Python. If you prefer either one, you've made a good choice.
Interesting points
The Smith and Wesson hammer bar system is far superior to the Colt because of the ease and specificity of the adjustments that can be made to the trigger. A Python tuner named Jungkind (who was one of the Few who could expertly tune the Colt system) said of the Smith "even a rhesus monkey can be taught to tune a Smith". That is why 99% of competitive shooters use Smith.
I’ve shot both and ended up with a 686 plus. Both ran beautifully. The S&W felt better to me. Not meant to be a knock on the Colt, the S&W just fits me better. Out of the box, the S&W trigger beats out the Colt hands down in my opinion.
I have a 686. Love it. Finally saved up and bought a Python. Took it out to some property I own to put some rounds down range. First shot…click. 2 or 3 rounds out of every cylinder would not fire. 4 different types of ammo. Same issue. Put all the un-fired rounds into my 686 and they went off with no issues. Turned out to be a light primer strike. Had to send the Python right back. It works now. But the trigger is so heavy and “spongy”. Was sadly disappointed . Especially considering the cost.
Does yours have the 'L" stamped near the serial number. The first of the 2,000 model Pythons had these problems. Yankee claimed the other shooters like 'Hickok 45' didn't know how to shoot a revolver. Which is insane!
Turns out the problem is real.
The side plates were not tight enough. Colt fixed all the guns that were returned. And updated the Colt's assembly process.
Call Colt. They should be able to quickly repair or replace it.
Hickok didn’t know how to shoot the gun. I demonstrated that on video. The gun he used had zero issues. Loose side plates? That is something you tell idiots to appease them.
@@stever8776 consider how revolvers function for just a moment. Then explain how a loose side plate could possibly cause light primer strikes.
@@peter_d🤔
@@TheYankeeMarshal
Bull Shit!!
Colt finally admitted there was a problem. Didn't you watch the numerous videos Colt made!
Hickok45 has been shooting handguns longer than you have been alive!!!
He certainly knows how to shoot double and single action!
Your problem seems to be pride is more important than Truth!
As you hopefully know colt has a long history of quality control issues.
I bought one of the very first generation 1 Anacondas. On my first cylinder of shots. Parts fell out of the gun!! And these were not hot loads!
Colt repaired and returned my gun in less than 2 weeks.
On the new Pythons
First Colt claimed the side plate issue and said people were not using the correct adhesive.
Then they said it was an early production issue.
Then they finally admitted on a TH-cam video that the problems were real and they would repair and update guns
In the video Colt said they made slight mechanics changes to fix the issues.
They said you could tell if the gun you bought had the new parts you could tell by the 'L' stamped inside by the serial number!!
I stopped watching your channel for a while as Slander and inflated egos are not traits I admire.
I recently started to watch your videos again as forgiveness is better than being bitter
As others have said, I believe the direction of cylinder rotation does make a difference. The Colt rotates in the direction of closure. So you have the hand rotating the cylinder but also pushing the cylinder closed into the frame. The hand remains up along with the cylinder bolt at final lock up making the detent on the ejector rod unnecessary. There’s no rattling when the hammer drops.
Makes sense.
Never had an issue due to which way the cylinder rotates. Then again I'm not a die hard revolver guy.
This makes my S&W-586 fantastic by default. No boot cut style grips on my wheelgun. Full straight butt, rosewood grips in the combat contour with finger grooves.
Ruger vs smith internals next?
That'd be difficult since the Ruger internals come out with the trigger guard. There's no side plate to see inside of the gun.
@@whelper4231
That's one of the reasons the GP100s are so strong. I have a 3", 4" and 5". Now I'm on the lookout for a 10mm
@@stever8776 Yep, GP100 4" was my first handgun, and still love it! 👍
@@whelper4231love the gp100. Its a Tank 😎
The Colt is "Ronnie" and the SW is "Big Ethel" in "Archie" comics😄: Great Comparison Yankee "grown-ass-man"! WELL DONE: It made up my mind what to get now! Thanks
Hey brother... Just a word of warning:
You've got to be very careful with those hyphens, when you're referring to Yankee.
See, the phrasing of "Grown-Ass, Man", means something actually quite a bit different than saying "Grown, Ass-Man". If you re-read those carefully in comparison, I think you'll grasp my implication, without me having to explain more specifically. I don't want to come across as slanderous to certain aspects of the good YM's reputation or, um... personal... predilections.
And then while we're at it, spelling is another important problem in this regard too. If I were to say "Groan-Ass Man", vs. "Grown-Ass Man", then even though those *sound* exactly the same, in text that also would convey two entirely different meanings. (If you catch my drift. Y'know... again, I don't want to say too much.)
So, even though Yankee might *say* that phrase very casually, we, if we're *writing* the same thing in response, must be sure to type with some precision. Your rendition of the title with hyphens in *both* positions... is leaving things a bit too ambiguous. (Are we only talking about his age? Or his... erm... y'know... "preferences" ?) I'm sure you'll agree that Yankee just by himself, gives us plenty enough ambiguity and cause for suspicion about his personal issues generally, without us chiming in recklessly and making it all seem any worse than it already is.
😜
@@boatrat Ah, dear friend, your astute observation regarding the hyphens has left me in stitches! 🤣 Indeed, I must admit, I never quite realized the potential for such... ahem... misinterpretation when it comes to punctuation!
Fear not, I shall proceed with the utmost caution in my future phrasings, lest I unintentionally spark a debate on Yankee's, ahem, proclivities! 🙈 Your guidance on the nuances of spelling and punctuation in this delicate matter is truly invaluable.
Rest assured, I shall endeavor to avoid any further unintentional comedic misunderstandings, and instead, strive to bring forth only the most refined and hyphenationally precise discourse. 😄 Thank you, good sir, for shedding light on this matter with such wit and humor!
Interested to see how the colt viper compares having a similar price point.
That's a good question. Does the King Cobra (I think that's the same as the Viper) have similar internals to the Python? I'm not sure. 🤔
Colts rear sight shoots loose, smith doesn't. Easy fix with some wilson combat sights though. But still poor design. And no locktite is not supposed to be on adjustable sights before anyone says that. My source is myself as I own both and shoot both regularly.
Well done review.
Well done, Sir. As a lifelong Smith and Wesson fan, I prefer the Python as well. 🐍
Colt 😎
I had a Python Elite Stainless back in the '00s. It was used, but still like $1100. I found the grip to be too chunky, even with the Hogue Monogrip. The DA was nice, but the narrow, serrated trigger cut into my finger. By contrast, my 686+ has a smooth, wide trigger and a better grip for my hand. I sold the Python and later bought an unfired SW m.27 with 8.4" barrel, which I like a lot better. Now if only I could get some .357 or even .38 ammo without mortgaging my house.
Yes I love that model 27 I believe that's the original Smith & Wesson combat Magnum if I'm not mistaken😊
Thanks Yank good job how about the 586 l comp
Thank you for an excellent video review. I normally don’t prefer comparisons because I’m usually only interested in one of the firearms presented but in this case it was perfect and I liked the two models you selected for comparison. Unless I missed it you seemed to overlooked the comparison of the cylinder stop notches other than the direction of rotation. The deeper and longer notches on the Colt are less likely to show scouring lines after just a little use. I don’t at all disagree with your conclusion based on your preferences. I’m probably a little weird because I prefer the 686 over the 686+. However I do prefer the Colt even though it’s pricier because of the fit and finish and because I don’t care for how the key lock detracts from the 686+ appearance.
Why would you prefer 6 shots over 7 😳 you lost me there. 🤯
Revolver guys. 🤦
I gotta get another 686+ (7 shot, 4 inch stainless, black rubber grips)... It's sort of the perfect revolver in my opinion. I sold it for tuition money, damn it! I'll get another one soon.
On the Smith, the hammer & trigger pins protrude & are supported by matching holes in the side plate. How are the corresponding pins supported in the Colt? When, or if Colt manufactures a 7 shot Python, what the game plan? Do all current models of the 686 have 2 piece barrels?
Both are good guns, even though my Colt don't like hard primers and a stronger spring is non-existent. Personally, I would pick the only one of the two guns that parts are available for. That would be the S&W 686. Colt absolutely refuses to sell parts for the new Python. A broken FP on the Colt is strictly a factory return job. On the S&W it's a nothingburger.
I own one of the original Colt Pythons with a 4 inch barrel. I haven’t found another revolver that can match mine, including the new Python.
Nice guns but I have no need for a 357 Magnum since I carry Glocks 33 and 32. Both 357 Sig models have 357 Mag power, greater capacity, less recoil, are lighter and reload faster. Wheel guns and the .45 ACP are relics of a bygone era, today they are as likely to get you killed as not.
Where were you back in 1985 when I upgraded to a SW 686 Distinguished Combat Magnum for my duty gun? I always called it the “poor man’s Python.” 😂😂😂
The Colt has a lot of nice little Details. Looks nice.
I will not purchase a new Smith because of the lock.
Yes a lot of people hate the Hillary Hole
Understandable. That does annoy me that smith ignores that we don't want the locks.
@@dancruze did you see the new Smith lock works. It looks like a Lego.
Perhaps the Lawyers are afraid to remove the grip safeties.
Novak used to make a beaver tail / main spring housing without the grip safety.
Unfortunately only available for very limited time. Some of the Wilson modern carry models do not have the grip safety
There’s a simple solution, just don’t use it, that’s what I do.
Love my 386 and 586 L-comp
I’ve watched a lot of your videos Yankee, always informative, to the point & helpful. If I was to purchase a .357, I’d go with the Smith.
Hi Yankee, I bought my 686 in 1993 and it looks like some of its feature are not shared by the contemporary 686, I think a comparison between the python and the older 686 may have the same outcome but with less points in favor of the former. I prefer the 686 none the less because of my hand size (very small).
Speaking of the Smith cylinder guide, when I was first getting into guns and rented a Smith 686 at the range, the first time I shot it, there was more flash in the cylinder area than I was used to in automatics. I looked closer and thought I had done something wrong and blown out the cylinder guide. It was so odd shaped to me. I took it to the front and showed the guy. He said he thought it was supposed to be that way. We looked at other Smiths and saw it was supposed to be that way.
Common issue.
Great vid.
Would it have been more fair to compare the Python to a Performance Center S&W?
Can you compare the SW 629 vs new Anaconda, please?
I have a 686 plus. But it is in a four inch barrel. Also, I like your shirt.
Thanks for the comparison. I’m in the market for a 357 before California’s tax takes effect. This video helped me decide in the 27 vs 686 decision, but it brought the Python into the mix! Can you do a side by side of these? I know the 27 is blue and an N Frame, but does it have any improved craftsmanship to match up with the Python?
Do this but compare a taurus to one of these. Would be interesting.
That would be interesting
Team python!!!but i do like the 686 plus for its 7th round...but it isnt a snake.
Snakes 🐍
After shooting both, some belonging to me and some borrowed, I give the old Python the edge. Not sure how the new Pythons stack up against the old ones. One particular Python which stands out was an older 8" with a 2.5x scope, which some guy at the range used for deer and hog hunting (in the woods, not at the range). That revolver was a tack driver. He had taken quite a few deer and hogs with it and given its phenomenal accuracy, I believe him. My 686 6" prefers 180 grain bullets but it is not as accurate as that Python nor is the trigger as smooth.
Excellent video. You sold me on the Colt. A few hundred bucks more is worth it to me
Appreciate this video. Well done and informative. Curious, is there much difference in concealing a 2.5” Python over a 3.0” Python?
Cool! What about the Dan Wesson 15?
My EDC is the standard 686 4 inch awesome gun NEVER part with it.
The leads on the Colt cylinder look like they belong on a SSA race gun - for rapid fanning.
The Smith wins by price and number of rounds
Call Colt and ask for a side plate screw. They won’t sell you one, and don’t provide any parts support. I’ve owned the new Pythons, and sold them. The Python looks nicer.
How is that possible? That seems insane.
@@chrisnedbalek2866 That’s what I told Colt’s rep.
I can beat those in “utilitarian” gun. I bought a used Ruger Security Six 4” bbl, nickel plated with original Ruger rubber grips with silver medallions in .357 Mag. about 8 years ago. Only paid ~ $400 for it. Was looking for a GP100 in 357 but what they had on display (what Lipsey’s was pushing) was the GP100 in .44 SPCL and that ain’t what I was shopping for. I couldn’t be happier for what I got.
What do you think of the Tk custom internal lock plugs?
I just know the 686+ is one of the most accurate revolvers I have.
How about some love for the 586 yankee.
I like them both but only own the S&W 686 4" 6-shot and many other new and old S&W revolvers. The only Colt revolver I have to date is a 1973 Colt Detective Special 6-shot 2.5" .38 Special. I always wanted a Colt Python .357 Magnum in the 4" or 6" barrel length. Unfortunately every time I found one the guy wanted way too much for it for us to agree on a reasonable price. If I could bargain a little bit I would already have one. Some people's prices are obscene and way out of reality. Didn't have that problem with my 1955 S&W Model 36 (technically even before they called it the M36), 1977 S&W Model 49 Bodyguard, 1977 S&W Model 10, 1996 S&W Model 49 Bodyguard (the last year I think) etc etc.
Yankee Marshall please do a side by side detail review comparing GP100 to the Colt Python
Back in 1994 a S&W 686 cost $350 a Python cost $900. I also, learn that a Python needed to be tuned every 1000 rounds of 357 mag rounds, the S&W not needed. And then we have the Ruger Security Six, which is the strongest. So, I bought the Ruger and the S&W 686 and a Ruger Mark II and took my wife out to a nice dinner instead of buy a delicate Python.
Well put. I’ll spend the extra for the trigger any day. What’s $500. Bullets are $1 ea or more. get the the colt you will love it!!
the rear sight on the colt is known for being trash. replace it with the wilson combat and it won't move around anymore
Hand polished my Smith to a mirror like finish
Yet Pythons have been known to be less robust than S&Ws. Maybe the new ones are stronger.
I gotta say, I have always loved the look of the Python. But have owned two Smiths.
I love my 686! Never shot a python, but for the price difference I went with the 686
Best gun? S&W 329PD (whicj I want) loaded with BuffaloBore 44 Special 200 grain HC wadcutters. It'll stop the BG with 10 decibels less than a 357. 2nd best is my Ruger Redhawk 44 but too heavy for EDC.