@@greeneyedsoutherngirl6468 yes that's why he was disbarred and found to be a complete disgrace not only to the legal field but to the Marine Corp. Thata girl greeneyes you sure do know how to pick em'. lol
I remember watching this live. F.Lee Bailey starts out by asking seemingly random questions. As it went on, you realized he was spinning a web around Fuhrman that he wouldn't be able to get out of.
@@jacksonk.fozzbodie213 He was found not guilty. If you're asking my opinion, I think he is guilty beyond all doubt. I wasn't a juror in the OJ Simpson trial so my opinion doesn't mean jack shit and neither does yours.
@@jacksonk.fozzbodie213 so you're going to go with the I'm white and I say so huh that's crazy I guess the prosecution not proven their case had nothing to do with it the evidence didn't equate to him doing it so you go ahead they keep thinking he's guilty he would of had to be Superman to kill two people the way they were killed and not to get a scratch on him...go sit down somewhere loser. Nicole Brown was a loser dope fiend trash her and her friend Faye Resnick running all over Brentwood giving Bjays for grams of cocaine. OJ he didn't want her anymore he had no motive to kill her why would you kill somebody that you don't want that's on drugs 🤔 so I guess OJ killed Brett Cantor also who was screwing Nicole who owned the nightclub the dragonfly in Hollywood and he was murdered the same exact way.
@Jordan Sharpe Actually no they did n9t. They had no answer for all the blood and came up with unproven conspiracy theories like LAPD planted evidence. The juror admitted it was payback for Rodney King.
Yes he even help me save money.whenever im out shopping i hear his voice asking :"and why are you buying that?do you really need that?My response:i wish to exercise my 5th amendment rights
The trap was well laid for an individual who thinks he is the law and not law enforcement. Fuhrman is learning now that he's not as smart as he thought he was. His confidence is starting to unravel. Lying about the identity of Nicole was a major indicator that something was wrong with Fuhrman's testimony. How could he not know who she was with all those pictures inside the home.
@@thebiggestbrookmonkfan F.Lee Bailey's memory is photographical and that's were the prosecution was at a lost, he'd bring up facts and then skip over it and then come back to the question even catching Judge Ito off guard as to say I'm asking another question? Mark Fuhrman is a liar and he continues to contradict himself. Now he's worried, because he knows exactly were F. Lee Bailey's interrogation is going. As the camera goes from OJ to Ms Clark and Darden it's a series of objections by the prosecution that never ends. Mark Fuhrman's smirk is gone and so is his water in his red solo cup. Mark Fuhrman is so arrogant that he really doesn't care about getting cought, because he believes he's the law and the people will approve of his planting of evidence to catch OJ Simpson Mark Fuhrman wasn't alone in his effort Vanatter was another one carrying bloods all over the place. I've always wondered how Mark Fuhrman feels 27 years later knowing he will always be thought of as the cop that took a dump on the prosecution's case. If the jury wasn't convinced that something was wrong with this police officer, their suspicions would be confirmed very shortly afterward by a full confession by Mark Fuhrman on tape to a writer who he's been corresponding with for years even while the trial was in progress; its just unbelievable that the prosecution did not know this. Ms Clark would eventually say his personal views have nothing to do with the case.......I guess that's why she's the inspiration for Sally in the nightmare before Christmas. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Spoken like a true moron who is assuming what the defense laid for the morons to grasp which they did, to not even consider the actual evidence. Congratulations stupid; you ignored the evidence and looked at the shiny object, just like the stupid jury did. Perfect.
Exactly,and you are so concerned that there might be more deaths at oj residence that you climb a fence and walk around alone with no weapon drawn ,no bullet proof vest in the dark after seeing 2 bodies multilated and you casual walking around in the dark give me a break.and fox 5 gave this admitted Racist a job after the case was over .he's suing other people over him planting a glove but he admittedly reported beating black people nearly to death but he's outraged over the fact that they are saying he planted a glove.he is atypical of most cops who enforce the law in thus country stupid ,racist ,and liars .I truly don't believe the phycology test to become a cop needs to be revised to sniff out racist like him .
He’s a moron. He’s forcing the audience to look where he chooses. There should be a wide angle shot so all reactions can be watched and the audience decides. He thinks he’s doing something but he is just doing too much.
Johnnie Cochran watching F Lee Bailey and the smile on his face for F Lee bringing out the truth is amazing. Fuhrman shouldn’t have been allowed to be a detective
He is a high School drop out,Barely reads.He never mentioned a glove in his report.He had tried to getablity on the grounds ,''I cannot work with spanish or negroes,whnever I see them ,my hand starts reaching for my gun'.They gave him a psychological test,said he was normal,sent him back to work.Years later he framed OJ.
Yea, he was a regular Perry Mason here. LOL!!!! All he needed was a trench coat so he could turn around quickly and point. Let's be real. If this wasn't one of the most INEPT prosecution teams ever assembled, this would have been a very easy and routine conviction. No one with even half a brain thinks Simpson was innocent.
The way the justice system is set up is... a person is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. That's every person's constitutional right. So as OJ sits in this court room he is an innocent man. The prosecution must prove that he is the murderer beyond a reasonable doubt. The Defense, on the other hand, must punch holes in the prosecution's presentation of evidence with the intent of showing reasonable doubt. Keep in mind that there were no eye witnesses and there was no murder weapon recovered. So the case is based purely on circumstantial evidence. The prosecution has to present a case where the evidence is strong enough to prove OJ's guilt. Let's look at the evidence....OJ's blood was found at the murder scene...on the gloves.... on and in the bronco, on the socks. Where is the doubt? He's guilty, right? Here is the doubt...OJ graciously volunteered to be questioned by the Police when he took the first flight back from Chicago to LA. During the questioning he agreed to allow LAPD to draw his blood. Detective Vannetter....instead of filing the blood, he took the blood vial with him back to the crime scenes. He had the blood with him for 3 or 4 hours. Is that crazy or what? If that's not enough reasonable doubt....how about this...The lab technician testified that he drew 8cc's of OJ's blood. He said that when Vanetter returned the vial back to the lab after having the blood at the crime scenes for 3 or 4 hours, 1.5cc's were missing. Do you hear me? 1.5 cc's of OJ's blood was missing. Hold up. If that is not enough reasonable doubt, check this out....All of OJ's blood recovered from the murder scene, from the gloves, from the socks... had EDTA in it. EDTA is the preservative that the lab places in the vial when blood is drawn. I don't see how anyone can honestly say that there was not reasonable doubt when there is a mountain of reasonable doubt. You can believe what you want to believe, but belief counts for nothing.
Yep. People say things like "they didn't prove he planted any evidence" but the reality is they didn't have to. They simply had to convince the jury it was possible and they'd introduced doubt. On top of that, the defense convinced the jury that there was a possible motive behind the possible planting of evidence. All of these assertions by the defense created reasonable doubt and the jury, without a murder weapon or eye witnesses, pretty much had no choice but to render a not guilty verdict.
You're almost spot on. But, not all of the blood had EDTA. The blood on the back gate and the blood on the socks had EDTA. That said, having only found it in those two samples is enough to cancel out all of the blood.
Just rewatching the chain of events that took place was just outrageous; and the behavior of law enforcement officers and every last one of them continued to lie about their involvement in this case. No matter how small it was, right down to the cop who put handcuffs on OJ; he admitted that he was told by Vanatter to arrest OJ. And under cross examination by Ms Clark tried to deny it in a round about way, for fear of being an outcast in LAs predominantly white law enforcement officers. Ms Clark spent an entire case defending law enforcement officers, especially when Mark Fuhrman's Generational Racism was called into question even saying that she wanted a copy of F. Lee Bailey's statements about Fuhrman using racial epithets at Black men. The planting of evidence was obvious even in the collection of evidence by Mr Fung and Ms Mazzola a trainee criminalist who did not lie about putting her initials on those blood evidence that was collected at the crime scenes, only to be changed by Mr Fung and replaced her initials with his own. This is the same individual who took OJs blood from Vanatter at OJs resident, not realizing he was being filmed indirectly now both Vanatter and Fung are caught in a lie. How can anyone trust the blood evidence with all this lying by people who are responsible for the collection of evidence. Was the blood evidence at OJs resident accidentally mixed up with the blood evidence at Nicole's residence? We're left to trust the police officers and investigators involved with this case who worked for the LA Law enforcement agencies. It doesn't look good! F. Lee Bailey's breaking down of Mark Fuhrman was the entire collapse of this case just masterful how one man flipped this case from OJ murdering both Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman to an entire police force becoming the suspects against OJ. The prosecution team was outlawed by the best money could afford from their forensic experts to special investigators who traveled the globe in search of evidence. Personally I believe that like most law enforcement agencies in America when it comes to handling Black African Americans," you are guilty until proven innocent, because they can't afford adequate attorneys who will fight for Justice. Unlike a public defender who works for the State with limited resources and no budget to defend their clients,guilt or innocence. Your more likely to accept a plea bargain rather than face a lengthy trial that's going to cost the state money. OJ Simpson wasn't that case and the verdict wasn't what Americans expected on all sides of the great divide racially and politically, and economically The only thing that didn't come into this case was Religion.........
F Lee Bailey line of questioning is like building a house, he meticulously lays the foundation and then he skillfully builds his case! Flawlessly done!
Mark Fuhrman isn't being a wise guy now. That smug on his face is gone. Now he's become trapped by his own words and can't deny anything that is written.
Funny that every actor they picked to play these guys in American Crime Story looks just like them except Cuba Gooding Jr as O.J. looks nothing like him.
I thought the same thing, Cuba doesn't look anything like O.J., but when I watched the whole series he won me over and convinced me he WAS him. I thought he did an excellent job.
Right after this case Bailey represented a young man Pro Bono charged with murder.His dismantling of the Police investigation was so devastating theJudge dismissed the case and let the young man go.
Odd that Fuhrman implicitly decided that irrelevant evidence was going to be brought into the trial. The guy that finds everything, admits to setting up/beating/choking out Black people is also saying irrelevant evidence was going to be brought in??? Who is he to decide what is relevant? I keep asking, why is Fuhrman not a suspect?
Romeo, just by your comment, I'm guessing ............... government run school attendee? Also, you get your news from MSNBC ............ yep. "Caught in "so much" lies". 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣.
@@dyates6380 Dude please I know u hate O.J but Bailey caught the man in so many lies. FIRST OF ALL Mark Furhman knew Nicole personally I know u didn't know that, 2 Fuhrman was told it was Nicole on the ground dead by another cop before he came to the crime scene. 3 Furhman found the glove and blood on and in the Bronco. The tickets was he said he saw the blood in the Bronco and he said the Glove was moist and sticky with blood. M?mmmmmmmm everyone know blood 4 or 5 hours in the air dries real quick like 30 mins at most. He also said he saw them by his feel. The. He denied saying it
1:03:09 I love how years later Marcia Clark claimed to dislike Mark Fuhrman and what he said.... well, this is her reaction AFTER she allegedly found out how racist he was... she knew he was a racist already... that's why she's not angry or disgusted here. She acts like she's got a crush on him.
Marcia Clark and that entire team appeared to be top shelf...but were simply going through the obvious evidence. Ding Dong Chris D. Was obcessed with OJ trying the glove and that backfired!!! Marcia was hand ten pounds of shit and told to place it into a 5lbs bag!!!
@@vitocarbonara7770 That's a BS narrative Marcia and Johnny painted. Because it's an "iconic" TV moment. People are simple minded and need a reason why the OJ was let free. They didn't watch the trial still haven't watched the trial... They got their beliefs from television. The jury didn't acquit OJ because of the gloves. They acquitted him because they sat and listened to all of the evidence. I know people haven't watched the trial when they start talking about "All the evidence"
mz Kaye I think by “them” he was referring to the glove, knit cap, and envelope containing the glasses. Not that I’m defending Furhman, those tapes were absolutely disgusting. But, at least 14 other officers say there was only one glove at the crime scene before Furhman got there. I believe them.
Pommie bears I’m not saying you’re wrong but the question he was responding to was, “When did you see the glove?” which is what made it interesting. And I don’t believe 14 officers had a vantage point to even if look at the glove, he said you couldn’t see it from the front door and there wears a plant that was cascading down over it . And the theory is that the other glove was not easily seen except for along the north path so mabye 14 officers only saw one glove but that doesn’t mean there wasn’t two gloves
Nothing can make a day better than watching F Lee Bailey in action - especially if you are in the legal profession. As for the case at bar, OJ was set up.
Lol jes He was set up? His guilty and got away with murder.. people have to accept that now its 26 years ago.. theres no one else but O.J and theres too much evidence
@@ivanisization jason simpson? all those chef knives. why didn't the prosecution call Ross Cutlery's owner at the real trial like they did at the preliminary hearing?
furhman wasn't prepared for f. lee bailey's organization skills and improvisation on the fly. it caught him off guard on a few occasions which caused him to acknowledge who kathleen bell was whether he tried to deny it or simply couldn't recall such memory, as he claimed. in addition, it caused him to lie about not knowing the context of his prior simulated cross-examination as well as the questions asked by who and their implications, along with the purpose of his answers.
Those that say it’s nitpicking aren’t lawyers. I happened to think Mr Bailey did a superb job in his cross examination of Furhman, I believe that Furhman planted the glove. However I still believe Simpson either committed or was involved in the murders.
I’m curious....what evidence can you point me to anywhere throughout this whole trial I assume you watched..that would convince you that your belief that Fuhrman planted the glove. To clarify...a belief is an individual opinion? Is that fair to say? I’m asking you to guide me to or lead me to a fact or some evidence that leads you to entertain the belief. Keep in mind these points while thinking back....what does Furhman have to tangibly gain by planting a glove. Why would he plant a glove? Do you think that he would risk his career trying to frame O.J? Finally...and do you think that by planting the glove...not only would it convict the person he’s trying to frame...but that he would be able to plant the evidence and not only get away with planting it...but then get everyone involved on the exact same page that covers his planting of the evidence...and by everyone being on the same page means they now to may get caught lying or conspiring in a capital case and risk jail,careers, etc....just to get a conviction. To convict O.J. Doesn’t seem logical, worth it, plausible, realistic. I’m basing everything I said on reality, facts, reasoning....not opinion or belief. I’m curious to hear your version of fact relating to each of the things I mentioned above.
@@brandonhead13 Bravo. Fuhrman had nothing to gain nor did he have TIME to plant the glove! And how the hell could he know that OJ had cuts on his left hand? It makes no sense. OJ is guilty as sin, the evidence is so clear and obvious.
@@brandonhead13 Just like all of the officers involved in the Rodney King beating and all of the other instances of police misconduct involving African Americans... Could have walked over to the jury and said "we did it"... And still got away with it! A dose of your own medicine as the saying goes. 😷 Once all of us as Americans begin to see Justice for people of every skin color... (Rodney King, Reginald Denny, Emmett Till, the Scottsboro boys, Etc)... Then we can all sit around in a circle and cry about Nicole and Ron. Until then... Such as life! We have to suffer it and now the whole world knows what it's like for the first time in their life to suffer the pain that we have suffered for decades at the hands of Intolerable and unspeakable Injustices. The score and the level of pain inflicted upon us as blacks versus what ever imagined Injustice that we have done... Has not even begun to even up. This whole situation began with the tyranny of slavery followed by the equal tyranny of segregation and then finally (after fighting for our survival as a race in this country) the police brutality and other forms of systemic Injustice that African-Americans have suffered. Stop your bitching and moaning and crying! America has made her bed by hating her brother's of a minority and now... She has to lay in it. Consider that for fact. And even the things that you just stated were all based on things that are called inferences drawn from the supposed evidence from either side of this case whether that be the prosecution or the defense! So it is you... That is stating opinions and pushing them as facts! All Over America in courtrooms across this great nation of ours, individuals have been tried on crimes just the same as OJ and wrongfully convicted... Just to get a conviction on the part of the prosecutors. (I can State examples if you need me to. Though, if you do not know of these cases... I do not know where you have been in this country for the last couple of centuries.) The awesome power of the state has the financial, moral, jurisdictional, Manpower to withstand any supposed consequences that may come upon them simply put... because Of the likelihood that they will never be defeated at trial because of the above-listed reasons. They are the state and that is their power! Ever heard of United States code annotated??? Ever heard of the State Bar? These things all heavily favor the side of the prosecution against any said individual. (trial lawyers all know this, hence why they favor being prosecutors and not defense attorneys). Try reading a book sometime before you challenge people about their beliefs... Which happens to be based more on fact than yours are.
@@Dellboy56 He's clearly a skilled trial attorney that won several high profile cases. This cross examination is masterclass even tho I despise that his client was acquitted
@@jtrockr91 What fucking trial are you watching 👀 😳. Clearly they planted evidence. They're proven liars who repeatedly changed their stories to FIT a narrative that didn't fit facts. OJ beat his wife because his kids walked in on her blowing a guy on the couch - so he's a violent wife beater, but racist cops get caught repeatedly in lies, but their opinions are "evidence" is trustworthy???? 🙄 Domestic violence =potential murderer, but proud habitual racism = honesty??
Why did the prosecution choose not to bring the coroner Irwin Golden who had carried out the autopsy report and instead brought a different coroner who was not involved with the murders in the first place? If O J Simpson had been convicted, his conviction was going to be based on Irwin Golden's report. Was that fair on the prosecution's part?
They were trying to cover up mistake by this time, there was just to many mistakes being made, listen to Ms Clark she's begging for objections, but to avail. Ms Clark's direct examination of Mark Fuhrman was a disaster for starters she opens Fuhrman up as a racist person who made racist remarks to a white woman Kathleen Bell and several other white women. Then tried to say the defense team played the race card, when it was the prosecution team, who were defending a racist, and got exposed not only did they get exposed but this was the beginning of the end, and those gloves would come back to blow the case out of the courtroom. Mark Fuhrman isn't smirking anymore and trying to be a wise guy by now he's trapped by his own words. What an idiot he's most definitely a criminal cop, because he can't even keep up with his own lies. This was the best cross examination in the case. When recalled back to the witness stand outside the presence of the Jurors Mark Fuhrman pleads the fifth amendment. Inspite of all that was going on in that courtroom; I couldn't believe that public opinion was willing to accept Mark Fuhrman's pleading the fifth amendment after being accused of planting evidence among other things. At this point the case over in the closing arguments Ms Clark had to admit in front of that Jury that Mark Fuhrman was a racist and we all know what a racist is capable of? "Anything! Fuhrman said it himself on tape that he would falsify evidence to arrest a Black man regardless if he was innocent or not.
Golden's report corroborates The Notion of there existing Two Murders, and/or Two Types of Knives, in relation to Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman deaths, respectively. Htptiwny [viz, May Peace & Blessings be unto You All] Htptiwny [viz, May Peace & Blessings be unto You All]
@captainscentsible3938not when you have a police detective carrying around missing vials of blood. That made no sense, none. The video shows him putting them in his car! WTH, why did he do that!
Why does this camera man hold a close up of one person or thing at a time? It’s so annoying. There’s so much going on not shown. Just pan out and allow the audience to choose what they look at. Camera men always doing too much.
54:40 so are we to believe that this DETECTIVE can remember with intricate detail, every step he took nine months prior, but when asked to tell them just ONE of the questions he was asked during his “prep sessions” he “can’t recall” one single question or detail about that session. This is an insult to the intelligence of the Jury and anyone watching this. A blatant lie.
I’m not sure what you’re responding to? They lost the trial. That was my point. Everybody involved in this case, witnesses, jurors, winners and losers went on to make a ton of money. Still doesn’t take away from the fact he was exposed and disgraced 🤷🏽♀️
eric Mays kid gloves. Soft leather. It’s absorbent. Blood contracts when dried. Then, it shrinks the gloves too. He also had latex gloves on underneath the leather ones....there was no way those gloves were going to fit. Did OJ’s Bruno Magli shoes walk themselves around the murder scene too?? Lol.
Pommie bears Also do you mean the same shoes the detective took home before entering evidence the next day¿ Why wasn’t their blood on the floor of the bronco? That was a messy job and their are smidges of blood on the dashboard.
eric Mays erm...they didn’t have the shoes in the first trial. It was the civil trial that photographs of him in magazines showed him wearing the shoes. Don’t you know anything about the evidence in this case?? The shoes were never found. But, there were lots of pictures of him wearing them on the sidelines when he was as football. And, it is believed that the glove came off before he cut his finger.....that’s why he only left with one glove. It’s not that hard to fathom. You need to learn more about this case. Who told you the shoes were taken home by a detective or officer?? Lol.
1:10:05 I knew Ito (and others) knew what Bailey (and Cochran probably) was doing with their petty word plays and such... Ito actually says something here: "you know how it's pronounced, we all know how it's pronounced"
TURTLEo and PELICANo. Love the subliminal belittlement of Fuhrman's team. Bailey almost got away with it too. Ito caught it and realized what he was doing... still some impressive, next-level manipulation of the jury.
An interesting little play of words going on here, Fuhrman says he didn't pick the glove up 'at that time'... which the Defense is saying means he DID pick it up at a later time.... if you watch the earlier argument by Marcia, on this same morning before the Jury came in, she was arguing that a report wasn't final because it said "version 1" on it which she esteemed meant there was a version 2. So she was using the exact same argument, just two hours earlier in court.
Yes, of course. ALL of this is word play. They are nitpicking affidavits already given with the intent of tripping someone up with a word here or a word there that during testimony, may be different that what was recored months earlier and BOTH sides know anything different it irrelevant as it wouldn't change the fact that Simpson committed double murder. Both sides. We all know what's going on here. It's not stunning or anything that takes a whole lot of skill. You don't actually think Bailey pored over the dozens or hundreds of pages of interviewing paperwork or records, do you?
Bailey is talking, and acting like he has caught Fuhrman telling lies when in reality he's answering as good as possible. Baileys just asking detailed questions that are extremely hard to recall and answer whether you're telling the truth or not.
yep. and Ito allows Bailey to tear through the past 10 years of Fuhrmans life and grill him on various he-said-she-said scenarios…. It’s stupid and not at all relevant.
@@benicia21 I disagree. No one witnessed Fuhrman find or plant that glove. We are to take his word for it if he is to be believed. The premise of the line of questions in his examination is to establish motive to frame and his credibility. His history is more relevant in determining these two things. Bailey did a masterful job of exposing exactly who Fuhrman is and that he is in fact a liar.
Just curious, so there was one glove found at the scene of the murders correct? So Mark found the match to the glove and planted at Ojs house? Where did Mark find the glove to plant it? I mean the exact same glove? Did he buy it somewhere and plant it in that 15 minutes he was alone?
There was one glove at the murder site and the other at rockingham. The defense used the plant bs without evidence because they found tapes of his saying racist things for screen play. Whether he is a racist or not he was still a good detective and there was no to plant that glove because there were other 14 officers at murder scene that saw one glove and knit cap. But it was perfect for the defense to use the race card which was irrelevant but since it was allowed to be used on court by ito it was fair play for the defense to say everthing was planted and tainted with because he is black. Which again I say is complete bs. The dude oj was whitest black man in America 😂.
@@williebrown2463 he was referring to the one glove and nit cap by Goldmans feet. Just misspoke. Nothing more. There is 0 evidence that he moved a glove
"Sustained," "Denied", "Objection," "Over ruled" lol.."Do you know how to answer the courts questions?"..🤣🤣.lessoned learned here....dont get your prelim twisted against your cross examination given...YOU WILL GET HOOKED!! 🤣🤣😎👀 and look like a fool...And look at Cochran in the background just having a hayday admiring Mr. Bailey, "Dam this man's good!!!". 💪🏻🤫
The Rush started when he was going to plant the glove hahahahaha his hart was racing hoping no one would see him ,what a fucking clown Furman was hahahahaha
Why did the prosecution choose not to bring Mark Fuhrman to the witness stand second time? Why did the prosecution object Judge Ito's suggestion as he was going to tell the jurors to extrapolate his evasiveness based on the prosecutions's decision not to bring him to the witness stand? No one can tell me that the jurors were not advised about the prosecution's stern objection. Someone inside must have told something to the sequestered jurors what the heck went on!
1:12:10 the look on his face wasn’t like this on the previous lies but this one hit home for him. This man tried to ruin Orenthal and his mixed children life.
what drugs are you on? This guy found the glove, blood on the bronco, 1st on scene at Bundy AND Rockingham.. not call him as a witness at all? what message does that send? the DA wouldnt proceed with the case if that happened. Defence would win off that alone.
Lench Rides i was speaking in regards to ALL things considered , his history with the remarks he stated (racial etc) made him (regardless of what evidence he had discovered at the scene) unreliable as a witness
Praying Mommy - They kind of had to put Mark Fuhrman on the witness stand to direct examine him on the evidence he founded, so he have to be across examine by the defense attorney, Fuhrman was a key witness for the prosecution if you can't or don't put him on the witness stand most likely you're not going to win that case, so why go through with the trial at all if Fuhrman can't or don't take the witness stand to put into evidence all of his evidence he founded
This guy lies so much 🙄 and he did not expect Bailey to outwit him. Drinking from that cup of water too much and always says one thing but means another
He lies alot.. you can just sense that he's not a upstanding person, trying to sound soft spoken and honorable. What he doesn't know is a Skilled attorney like Bailey already did his homework on him, and is asking questions that he already knows the answer to. No matter how soft he tries to come off, you can actually sense the anger and lies radiate from him.
@@Ken-iu2zp Very poised like you said and calculated answer. Like when he says through pauses I took notes.But Bailey kept catching him in lies. Like when he wrote at his feet I saw them. Bailey asks him what did u mean by them he's says he was referring to the hat and the glove but in the context he wasnt talking about the hat. Lying all the time he even went on Oprah Winfrey with his Stories and Oprah actually bought his story too
@@romeoshlomo179 She was in it for the sensationalism aspect of it. The reason why she really bought into is also because like most people their minds were made up: Oj is guity. This stems from several things, but mainly if a person is arrested and brought into court on charges, people AUTOMATICALLY think he's guilty. Even if it's unconscious..... We all have that mindset. I even thought OJ was guilty at 1 point. When I really got into this case and STUDIED it that's when it hit me "Wow he really couldn't have committed these murders". As far as Furhman. Bailey really disliked this guy and you can sense that as well. The guy was notorious for setting people up. And in 2022, you can't believe it, but people actually overlook that, and still believe he didn't plant evidence even after him admitting that he does that to people.....What a world this is.
Daring Goldman nope...before this. It was a message to the LAPD that people aren’t going to put up with shit anymore. Unfortunately, it meant that Nicole and Ron didn’t get justice. But, it was definitely a message.
I mean herself from him..she was embarrassed to even try to even accept mark furman's phone calls...she further washed her hands from furball...Marsha may least wasn't a Racist.
The late actor pat morita would have made a perfect judge ito in American crime story. Cuba gooding, was not the right guy in playing simpson. Denzel washington should have been the actor to play simpson. Y
Jose Cienfuegos yeah right Denzel not doing no fx series !! Cuba got it cause he’s only middle age black man that was broke enough to take it was Oj or snow dogs 5 !! Not like Boys in hood 2 coming anytime soon
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡 If the jury, and people like you, weren't so stupid and corrupt, the killer would be behind bars. It's okay though. A long time has gone by. Cockroach and F Lee and Kardashian are literally smoldering as I type this, and the murderer and Shapiro will be joining them very soon. All in good time stupid, all in good time.
@@dyates6380 lmao you just mad Oj got the justice white folks get! Out of all the murders and atrocities white folks have committed… I’m amazed (not really) how this Oj case effect y’all! Hilarious
As someone who watched the trial every day at the time, the view of Bailey vs fuhrman at the time was furhman wasn’t fazed and Bailey failed to land any shots. If you read the comments now people think this was some masterpiece by Bailey. The facts was it was only when the fuhrman tapes became known did it all change
F Lee Bailey was the King of cross examination. Watching this is "legal poetry in motion"" . Fuhrman lost this case for them, if another cop was in the stand that had a more credible background OJ was done and dusted . Marcia Clark had a massive job trying to get the jury to put aside Fuhrman's racist comments and see the evidence . We have a lawyer here in New Zealand called Stuart Grieve who is also the King of Cross examination
Just when I thought humanity couldn't get any dumber, the comment section of this video comes into my life. I guess the killers are still on the loose, right guys?
@@TDKiller415 It has everything to do with the seemingly bottomless pit of hate most blacks have for whites, and little to do with Rodney King or Latasha Harlins. Luckily for blacks, the other "minority" groups also seem to hate whites as much, or more.
@@fmac0417 Well the Chinese are known for hating blacks too. I heard they had to make John Boyega a lot smaller on the Chinese Star Wars sequel trilogy posters so the films wouldn't be boycotted.
When F Lee Bailey scratches his head. He got a lethal question coming for Mark 😂😂😂
Lol correct lol
He has lice... and needs a cough drop for his constant cough
@@richardpoplis6777oh please, the man was an excellent attorney.
dude was a savage in this case. Had Furhman shaking inside 😅
@@greeneyedsoutherngirl6468 yes that's why he was disbarred and found to be a complete disgrace not only to the legal field but to the Marine Corp. Thata girl greeneyes you sure do know how to pick em'. lol
I watched the original back in 95 on Court TV. It's was genius then and more genius now!
What is so genius about this?
@@warrenhunter4422if you have to ask…
I remember watching this live. F.Lee Bailey starts out by asking seemingly random questions. As it went on, you realized he was spinning a web around Fuhrman that he wouldn't be able to get out of.
You do realize oj slaughtered those two people, right?
@@jacksonk.fozzbodie213 He was found not guilty. If you're asking my opinion, I think he is guilty beyond all doubt. I wasn't a juror in the OJ Simpson trial so my opinion doesn't mean jack shit and neither does yours.
Mark Anthony BS. My opinion does mean something libtard.
@@jacksonk.fozzbodie213 so you're going to go with the I'm white and I say so huh that's crazy I guess the prosecution not proven their case had nothing to do with it the evidence didn't equate to him doing it so you go ahead they keep thinking he's guilty he would of had to be Superman to kill two people the way they were killed and not to get a scratch on him...go sit down somewhere loser. Nicole Brown was a loser dope fiend trash her and her friend Faye Resnick running all over Brentwood giving Bjays for grams of cocaine. OJ he didn't want her anymore he had no motive to kill her why would you kill somebody that you don't want that's on drugs 🤔 so I guess OJ killed Brett Cantor also who was screwing Nicole who owned the nightclub the dragonfly in Hollywood and he was murdered the same exact way.
@Jordan Sharpe Actually no they did n9t. They had no answer for all the blood and came up with unproven conspiracy theories like LAPD planted evidence. The juror admitted it was payback for Rodney King.
When you start drinking out of a cup that has nothing in it.... its curtains! Lol
Very observant and funny as hades..😱😱😱😱😱😄😄😄😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😬😬😬😬😕😕😕😕😕😕😕😕😕😕😕😕😕😕
IKR...😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Lmao!!!😂
Laughing at your own sad jokes .
@@bdavis4075 I guess one smiling face is never enough .
Intensity rising... you can feel the build up to the big moment coming!
F. Lee Bailey is so good he makes you question yourself…RIP to the GOAT of cross examination!!
Yes he even help me save money.whenever im out shopping i hear his voice asking :"and why are you buying that?do you really need that?My response:i wish to exercise my 5th amendment rights
@@Karl_95😂😂😂😂 you’re right!!
Why am I watching this in 2021? This is absolutely fascinating!
Im right behind ya lol and fascinating it is
Same here
I watched in 2020 during lockdown - watching it again now addicted
Because most stuff on tv today is gay
I watch all the good ones over and over.
This is Classic Lawyering...Take a persons testimony fiber by fiber and obliterate it!!!!!!!! F. Lee Bailey one of the G.O.A.T's 🙏🏾
1:10:13 😊
The trap was well laid for an individual who thinks he is the law and not law enforcement. Fuhrman is learning now that he's not as smart as he thought he was. His confidence is starting to unravel. Lying about the identity of Nicole was a major indicator that something was wrong with Fuhrman's testimony. How could he not know who she was with all those pictures inside the home.
Damn that lawyer was good Bruh.
He previously met her as well.
@@thebiggestbrookmonkfan F.Lee Bailey's memory is photographical and that's were the prosecution was at a lost, he'd bring up facts and then skip over it and then come back to the question even catching Judge Ito off guard as to say I'm asking another question? Mark Fuhrman is a liar and he continues to contradict himself. Now he's worried, because he knows exactly were F. Lee Bailey's interrogation is going. As the camera goes from OJ to Ms Clark and Darden it's a series of objections by the prosecution that never ends. Mark Fuhrman's smirk is gone and so is his water in his red solo cup. Mark Fuhrman is so arrogant that he really doesn't care about getting cought, because he believes he's the law and the people will approve of his planting of evidence to catch OJ Simpson Mark Fuhrman wasn't alone in his effort Vanatter was another one carrying bloods all over the place. I've always wondered how Mark Fuhrman feels 27 years later knowing he will always be thought of as the cop that took a dump on the prosecution's case. If the jury wasn't convinced that something was wrong with this police officer, their suspicions would be confirmed very shortly afterward by a full confession by Mark Fuhrman on tape to a writer who he's been corresponding with for years even while the trial was in progress; its just unbelievable that the prosecution did not know this. Ms Clark would eventually say his personal views have nothing to do with the case.......I guess that's why she's the inspiration for Sally in the nightmare before Christmas. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Spoken like a true moron who is assuming what the defense laid for the morons to grasp which they did, to not even consider the actual evidence. Congratulations stupid; you ignored the evidence and looked at the shiny object, just like the stupid jury did. Perfect.
Exactly,and you are so concerned that there might be more deaths at oj residence that you climb a fence and walk around alone with no weapon drawn ,no bullet proof vest in the dark after seeing 2 bodies multilated and you casual walking around in the dark give me a break.and fox 5 gave this admitted Racist a job after the case was over .he's suing other people over him planting a glove but he admittedly reported beating black people nearly to death but he's outraged over the fact that they are saying he planted a glove.he is atypical of most cops who enforce the law in thus country stupid ,racist ,and liars .I truly don't believe the phycology test to become a cop needs to be revised to sniff out racist like him .
RIP Mr. Bailey....brilliant Lawyer
lol
No, just an arrogant, condescending, little fuck.
@@forrealforreal7203hey what u laughing at turd
At 56:20 is where Clark and Darden shit thier pants! Lmmfao. And Furham knew he was throwing them under the bus!!!
Hahaha... I think Ms Clark shits her pants and her period messed the chair. Lol
34:32 Bailey had to check Ito real quick he was like "I know what I'm doing fool" 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
😂😂
@@allthingsdebrena7554 do it
Bailey is an OG!!!
Bailey basically told him to respect his gangsta.
Savage
Ive gotta give the court camera person kuddos for looking for reactions from prosecutors under fire as well as everyone.
He’s a moron. He’s forcing the audience to look where he chooses. There should be a wide angle shot so all reactions can be watched and the audience decides. He thinks he’s doing something but he is just doing too much.
Back then they knew what they were doing! Way better than today!
It’s 2022 and this is amazing
yes people acted like adults back then huh? different times indeed.
I love that I was a teen during that time!
Johnnie Cochran watching F Lee Bailey and the smile on his face for F Lee bringing out the truth is amazing. Fuhrman shouldn’t have been allowed to be a detective
He is a high School drop out,Barely reads.He never mentioned a glove in his report.He had tried to getablity on the grounds ,''I cannot work with spanish or negroes,whnever I see them ,my hand starts reaching for my gun'.They gave him a psychological test,said he was normal,sent him back to work.Years later he framed OJ.
F. Lee Bailey was one of the best defense attorneys in the history of man kind.
Yea, he was a regular Perry Mason here. LOL!!!! All he needed was a trench coat so he could turn around quickly and point. Let's be real. If this wasn't one of the most INEPT prosecution teams ever assembled, this would have been a very easy and routine conviction. No one with even half a brain thinks Simpson was innocent.
Fuhrman kicked his ass
... still a devils advocate...
@@luskapani9905dude, the defence blew massive holes in the prosecution case!! OJ got off
@captainscentsible3938everybody did because it never in FACT happened
When f Lee bailey says... detective Furham.. he knows The answer!
😂😂😂😂😂😂 indeed
Yup lol
Furham?
And after answered, he utters “alright” or “okay”
darrin, a good lawyer never asks a question that he/she doesn’t already know the answer to.
The way the justice system is set up is... a person is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. That's every person's constitutional right. So as OJ sits in this court room he is an innocent man. The prosecution must prove that he is the murderer beyond a reasonable doubt. The Defense, on the other hand, must punch holes in the prosecution's presentation of evidence with the intent of showing reasonable doubt. Keep in mind that there were no eye witnesses and there was no murder weapon recovered. So the case is based purely on circumstantial evidence. The prosecution has to present a case where the evidence is strong enough to prove OJ's guilt. Let's look at the evidence....OJ's blood was found at the murder scene...on the gloves.... on and in the bronco, on the socks. Where is the doubt? He's guilty, right? Here is the doubt...OJ graciously volunteered to be questioned by the Police when he took the first flight back from Chicago to LA. During the questioning he agreed to allow LAPD to draw his blood. Detective Vannetter....instead of filing the blood, he took the blood vial with him back to the crime scenes. He had the blood with him for 3 or 4 hours. Is that crazy or what? If that's not enough reasonable doubt....how about this...The lab technician testified that he drew 8cc's of OJ's blood. He said that when Vanetter returned the vial back to the lab after having the blood at the crime scenes for 3 or 4 hours, 1.5cc's were missing. Do you hear me? 1.5 cc's of OJ's blood was missing. Hold up. If that is not enough reasonable doubt, check this out....All of OJ's blood recovered from the murder scene, from the gloves, from the socks... had EDTA in it. EDTA is the preservative that the lab places in the vial when blood is drawn. I don't see how anyone can honestly say that there was not reasonable doubt when there is a mountain of reasonable doubt. You can believe what you want to believe, but belief counts for nothing.
Yep. People say things like "they didn't prove he planted any evidence" but the reality is they didn't have to. They simply had to convince the jury it was possible and they'd introduced doubt. On top of that, the defense convinced the jury that there was a possible motive behind the possible planting of evidence. All of these assertions by the defense created reasonable doubt and the jury, without a murder weapon or eye witnesses, pretty much had no choice but to render a not guilty verdict.
You're almost spot on. But, not all of the blood had EDTA. The blood on the back gate and the blood on the socks had EDTA. That said, having only found it in those two samples is enough to cancel out all of the blood.
OJ is innocent Jason killed them
Just rewatching the chain of events that took place was just outrageous; and the behavior of law enforcement officers and every last one of them continued to lie about their involvement in this case. No matter how small it was, right down to the cop who put handcuffs on OJ; he admitted that he was told by Vanatter to arrest OJ. And under cross examination by Ms Clark tried to deny it in a round about way, for fear of being an outcast in LAs predominantly white law enforcement officers. Ms Clark spent an entire case defending law enforcement officers, especially when Mark Fuhrman's Generational Racism was called into question even saying that she wanted a copy of F. Lee Bailey's statements about Fuhrman using racial epithets at Black men. The planting of evidence was obvious even in the collection of evidence by Mr Fung and Ms Mazzola a trainee criminalist who did not lie about putting her initials on those blood evidence that was collected at the crime scenes, only to be changed by Mr Fung and replaced her initials with his own. This is the same individual who took OJs blood from Vanatter at OJs resident, not realizing he was being filmed indirectly now both Vanatter and Fung are caught in a lie. How can anyone trust the blood evidence with all this lying by people who are responsible for the collection of evidence. Was the blood evidence at OJs resident accidentally mixed up with the blood evidence at Nicole's residence? We're left to trust the police officers and investigators involved with this case who worked for the LA Law enforcement agencies. It doesn't look good! F. Lee Bailey's breaking down of Mark Fuhrman was the entire collapse of this case just masterful how one man flipped this case from OJ murdering both Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman to an entire police force becoming the suspects against OJ. The prosecution team was outlawed by the best money could afford from their forensic experts to special investigators who traveled the globe in search of evidence. Personally I believe that like most law enforcement agencies in America when it comes to handling Black African Americans," you are guilty until proven innocent, because they can't afford adequate attorneys who will fight for Justice. Unlike a public defender who works for the State with limited resources and no budget to defend their clients,guilt or innocence. Your more likely to accept a plea bargain rather than face a lengthy trial that's going to cost the state money. OJ Simpson wasn't that case and the verdict wasn't what Americans expected on all sides of the great divide racially and politically, and economically
The only thing that didn't come into this case was Religion.........
@@kennethcharles1386 not Africans
F Lee Bailey line of questioning is like building a house, he meticulously lays the foundation and then he skillfully builds his case! Flawlessly done!
Mark Fuhrman isn't being a wise guy now. That smug on his face is gone. Now he's become trapped by his own words and can't deny anything that is written.
Funny that every actor they picked to play these guys in American Crime Story looks just like them except Cuba Gooding Jr as O.J. looks nothing like him.
I thought the same thing, Cuba doesn't look anything like O.J., but when I watched the whole series he won me over and convinced me he WAS him. I thought he did an excellent job.
What’s funny is that Malcom Jamal Warner would’ve been a good OJ but he played AC
No black actors wanted to play OJ. Maybe no wonder Cuba Gooding Jr. can't get much acting these days, I wonder why???
cuba gooding could of played marcus allen though that's the crazy part lol
I wanna know why drug dealers killed Ron and nicole? Debt? Was Ron informing?
F Lee. Bailey was a great lawyer. Fuhrman did not stand a chance.
I really wish it was 1995 again!!!!
Habs Fan Same!
same here
This surely would've went down differently..."The Defense Never Rests" by F. Lee Bailey.
Same here my friend.
Omg, you and me both!
I don’t know how you gonna answer the question without looking 😂
He was hilarious. I love when he said “and you found some gloves, right detective?” 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Watching in October 2022. Trial of the century. All hail the King of Cross....the Late Mr F. Lee Bailey.
💐♥️🇺🇸
Right after this case Bailey represented a young man Pro Bono charged with murder.His dismantling of the Police investigation was so devastating theJudge dismissed the case and let the young man go.
Odd that Fuhrman implicitly decided that irrelevant evidence was going to be brought into the trial. The guy that finds everything, admits to setting up/beating/choking out Black people is also saying irrelevant evidence was going to be brought in??? Who is he to decide what is relevant? I keep asking, why is Fuhrman not a suspect?
He’s not a suspect because there is absolutely no evidence to suggest he is the killer. Quite straightforward
@@iPro3millionreally? Knowing what we know now about how the cops there helped P Diddy? Why wouldn’t he be a suspect? They are shady
Best lawyer ever
The brilliance of F. Lee Bailey. R.l.P. 🥀
💐🙏🏻♥️🇺🇸
Man was caught in so much lies but because he s a cop they trust him
Sad but true
well clearly some on the jury didn't trust him lol
Not everyone...
Romeo, just by your comment, I'm guessing ............... government run school attendee? Also, you get your news from MSNBC ............ yep. "Caught in "so much" lies". 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣.
@@dyates6380 Dude please I know u hate O.J but Bailey caught the man in so many lies. FIRST OF ALL Mark Furhman knew Nicole personally I know u didn't know that, 2 Fuhrman was told it was Nicole on the ground dead by another cop before he came to the crime scene. 3 Furhman found the glove and blood on and in the Bronco. The tickets was he said he saw the blood in the Bronco and he said the Glove was moist and sticky with blood. M?mmmmmmmm everyone know blood 4 or 5 hours in the air dries real quick like 30 mins at most. He also said he saw them by his feel. The. He denied saying it
it's 2022 IAM still watching
Fuhrman was such a poor liar.
1:03:09 I love how years later Marcia Clark claimed to dislike Mark Fuhrman and what he said.... well, this is her reaction AFTER she allegedly found out how racist he was... she knew he was a racist already... that's why she's not angry or disgusted here. She acts like she's got a crush on him.
I hate her
Marcia Clark and that entire team appeared to be top shelf...but were simply going through the obvious evidence. Ding Dong Chris D. Was obcessed with OJ trying the glove and that backfired!!! Marcia was hand ten pounds of shit and told to place it into a 5lbs bag!!!
It's keeping up appearances in front of the jury...
@@Whiplashed The jury WAS OUT. That's why Ito told Fuhrman he could stretch his legs....because they were waiting for the jury to come.
@@vitocarbonara7770 That's a BS narrative Marcia and Johnny painted. Because it's an "iconic" TV moment.
People are simple minded and need a reason why the OJ was let free.
They didn't watch the trial still haven't watched the trial...
They got their beliefs from television. The jury didn't acquit OJ because of the gloves.
They acquitted him because they sat and listened to all of the evidence.
I know people haven't watched the trial when they start talking about "All the evidence"
I heard him say them too in his preliminary hearing. I actually heard him say the word them twice.
mz Kaye I think by “them” he was referring to the glove, knit cap, and envelope containing the glasses. Not that I’m defending Furhman, those tapes were absolutely disgusting. But, at least 14 other officers say there was only one glove at the crime scene before Furhman got there. I believe them.
Pommie bears I’m not saying you’re wrong but the question he was responding to was, “When did you see the glove?” which is what made it interesting. And I don’t believe 14 officers had a vantage point to even if look at the glove, he said you couldn’t see it from the front door and there wears a plant that was cascading down over it . And the theory is that the other glove was not easily seen except for along the north path so mabye 14 officers only saw one glove but that doesn’t mean there wasn’t two gloves
Pommie bears I wonder when those fourteen other officers memorialized their critical observations.
@@1strights -None mentioned a glove in their report,including Fhurman.
Nothing can make a day better than watching F Lee Bailey in action - especially if you are in the legal profession.
As for the case at bar, OJ was set up.
Absolutely absurd!
Can u give an explanation to your beliefs? Would be interesting to hear
Lol jes He was set up? His guilty and got away with murder.. people have to accept that now its 26 years ago.. theres no one else but O.J and theres too much evidence
@@ivanisization can’t cite too much unadulterated evidence that points to OJ’s guilt. Just another emotional nitwit.
@@ivanisization jason simpson? all those chef knives. why didn't the prosecution call Ross Cutlery's owner at the real trial like they did at the preliminary hearing?
furhman wasn't prepared for f. lee bailey's organization skills and improvisation on the fly. it caught him off guard on a few occasions which caused him to acknowledge who kathleen bell was whether he tried to deny it or simply couldn't recall such memory, as he claimed. in addition, it caused him to lie about not knowing the context of his prior simulated cross-examination as well as the questions asked by who and their implications, along with the purpose of his answers.
It was completely irrelevant. The N word had nothing to do with anything. It was a distraction from the evidence that OJ was 100% guilty
OJ is INNOCENT !!
Jason Simpson is the MURDERER !!
When Gerry Spence came on T.V. and said that O.J. Simspon would be found guilty, because Gerry Spence could never pick a Capitol Case
Furman out here living life on the wild side!! Lol
Exactly, the rest of those people are dead & gone!
Bailey should have had a nice chianti with this meal.
Those that say it’s nitpicking aren’t lawyers. I happened to think Mr Bailey did a superb job in his cross examination of Furhman, I believe that Furhman planted the glove. However I still believe Simpson either committed or was involved in the murders.
shurrup ya ,moron
I’m curious....what evidence can you point me to anywhere throughout this whole trial I assume you watched..that would convince you that your belief that Fuhrman planted the glove. To clarify...a belief is an individual opinion? Is that fair to say? I’m asking you to guide me to or lead me to a fact or some evidence that leads you to entertain the belief. Keep in mind these points while thinking back....what does Furhman have to tangibly gain by planting a glove. Why would he plant a glove? Do you think that he would risk his career trying to frame O.J? Finally...and do you think that by planting the glove...not only would it convict the person he’s trying to frame...but that he would be able to plant the evidence and not only get away with planting it...but then get everyone involved on the exact same page that covers his planting of the evidence...and by everyone being on the same page means they now to may get caught lying or conspiring in a capital case and risk jail,careers, etc....just to get a conviction. To convict O.J. Doesn’t seem logical, worth it, plausible, realistic. I’m basing everything I said on reality, facts, reasoning....not opinion or belief. I’m curious to hear your version of fact relating to each of the things I mentioned above.
Lol
@@brandonhead13 Bravo. Fuhrman had nothing to gain nor did he have TIME to plant the glove! And how the hell could he know that OJ had cuts on his left hand? It makes no sense. OJ is guilty as sin, the evidence is so clear and obvious.
@@brandonhead13 Just like all of the officers involved in the Rodney King beating and all of the other instances of police misconduct involving African Americans... Could have walked over to the jury and said "we did it"... And still got away with it! A dose of your own medicine as the saying goes. 😷 Once all of us as Americans begin to see Justice for people of every skin color... (Rodney King, Reginald Denny, Emmett Till, the Scottsboro boys, Etc)... Then we can all sit around in a circle and cry about Nicole and Ron. Until then... Such as life! We have to suffer it and now the whole world knows what it's like for the first time in their life to suffer the pain that we have suffered for decades at the hands of Intolerable and unspeakable Injustices. The score and the level of pain inflicted upon us as blacks versus what ever imagined Injustice that we have done... Has not even begun to even up. This whole situation began with the tyranny of slavery followed by the equal tyranny of segregation and then finally (after fighting for our survival as a race in this country) the police brutality and other forms of systemic Injustice that African-Americans have suffered. Stop your bitching and moaning and crying! America has made her bed by hating her brother's of a minority and now... She has to lay in it. Consider that for fact. And even the things that you just stated were all based on things that are called inferences drawn from the supposed evidence from either side of this case whether that be the prosecution or the defense! So it is you... That is stating opinions and pushing them as facts! All Over America in courtrooms across this great nation of ours, individuals have been tried on crimes just the same as OJ and wrongfully convicted... Just to get a conviction on the part of the prosecutors. (I can State examples if you need me to. Though, if you do not know of these cases... I do not know where you have been in this country for the last couple of centuries.) The awesome power of the state has the financial, moral, jurisdictional, Manpower to withstand any supposed consequences that may come upon them simply put... because Of the likelihood that they will never be defeated at trial because of the above-listed reasons. They are the state and that is their power! Ever heard of United States code annotated??? Ever heard of the State Bar? These things all heavily favor the side of the prosecution against any said individual. (trial lawyers all know this, hence why they favor being prosecutors and not defense attorneys). Try reading a book sometime before you challenge people about their beliefs... Which happens to be based more on fact than yours are.
Bailey was a bulldozer cross examiner/lawyer. I don’t believe there is anyone close to his league
Juan Martinez!! Watch the whole Jodi Arias trial. He puts Bailey to shame..imo.
Surender your Badges for Judge ITO Officer Furhman there is no way Out
59:35 Baily hooks him.
Yes there is no way out
Like a 🎣
Cochran sitting there with a big stiffy
Furhman needed a diaper. He is being peeled apart. Slowly
RIP Mr Bailey a true legal legend
A disgraced, disbarred attorney...”A true legal legend”!?!?
@@Dellboy56 He's clearly a skilled trial attorney that won several high profile cases. This cross examination is masterclass even tho I despise that his client was acquitted
@@jtrockr91 What fucking trial are you watching 👀 😳. Clearly they planted evidence. They're proven liars who repeatedly changed their stories to FIT a narrative that didn't fit facts. OJ beat his wife because his kids walked in on her blowing a guy on the couch - so he's a violent wife beater, but racist cops get caught repeatedly in lies, but their opinions are "evidence" is trustworthy???? 🙄 Domestic violence =potential murderer, but proud habitual racism = honesty??
@@Dellboy56judgmental clown
@@Dellboy56damn right he is. And he was a great marine who served this country. 🙏🏻💐🇺🇸♥️
i love seeing Bailey frustrated as Furman refuses to answer about racial slurs
Why did the prosecution choose not to bring the coroner Irwin Golden who had carried out the autopsy report and instead brought a different coroner who was not involved with the murders in the first place? If O J Simpson had been convicted, his conviction was going to be based on Irwin Golden's report. Was that fair on the prosecution's part?
Robert, the prosecution failed in many respects.
They were trying to cover up mistake by this time, there was just to many mistakes being made, listen to Ms Clark she's begging for objections, but to avail.
Ms Clark's direct examination of Mark Fuhrman was a disaster for starters she opens Fuhrman up as a racist person who made racist remarks to a white woman Kathleen Bell and several other white women. Then tried to say the defense team played the race card, when it was the prosecution team, who were defending a racist, and got exposed not only did they get exposed but this was the beginning of the end, and those gloves would come back to blow the case out of the courtroom. Mark Fuhrman isn't smirking anymore and trying to be a wise guy by now he's trapped by his own words. What an idiot he's most definitely a criminal cop, because he can't even keep up with his own lies. This was the best cross examination in the case. When recalled back to the witness stand outside the presence of the Jurors Mark Fuhrman pleads the fifth amendment. Inspite of all that was going on in that courtroom; I couldn't believe that public opinion was willing to accept Mark Fuhrman's pleading the fifth amendment after being accused of planting evidence among other things. At this point the case over in the closing arguments Ms Clark had to admit in front of that Jury that Mark Fuhrman was a racist and we all know what a racist is capable of? "Anything! Fuhrman said it himself on tape that he would falsify evidence to arrest a Black man regardless if he was innocent or not.
Golden's report corroborates The Notion of there existing Two Murders, and/or Two Types of Knives, in relation to Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman deaths, respectively.
Htptiwny [viz, May Peace & Blessings be unto You All]
Htptiwny [viz, May Peace & Blessings be unto You All]
His testimony is in preliminary videos and he was awful
@captainscentsible3938not when you have a police detective carrying around missing vials of blood. That made no sense, none. The video shows him putting them in his car! WTH, why did he do that!
Why does this camera man hold a close up of one person or thing at a time? It’s so annoying. There’s so much going on not shown. Just pan out and allow the audience to choose what they look at. Camera men always doing too much.
Ich hätte lieber die ganze Zeit Baily den Anwalt gesehen. Die Seitenaufnahmen von Fuhrmann nervt wirklich.
@@TheAlexandriusIII what’s your English like? Good ?
This was when camera work was GOOD! Cameraman shows what’s important, F Lee Bailey and Fuhrman, and the prosecutor defeated.
54:40 so are we to believe that this DETECTIVE can remember with intricate detail, every step he took nine months prior, but when asked to tell them just ONE of the questions he was asked during his “prep sessions” he “can’t recall” one single question or detail about that session. This is an insult to the intelligence of the Jury and anyone watching this. A blatant lie.
Furman is nothing but a racist liar
He’s expected to remember key details based off previous testimony at the very least . He’s trained for that
that awkward smile between fuhrman and marcia clark at 1:03:26 shows they knew they were toast 🤣
Marcia wanted to cut off his ding ding lol 😅😅😅
He didnt lose c anything he went on to become a millionaire because of this trial
I’m not sure what you’re responding to? They lost the trial.
That was my point. Everybody involved in this case, witnesses, jurors, winners and losers went on to make a ton of money.
Still doesn’t take away from the fact he was exposed and disgraced 🤷🏽♀️
@@CousinPeachesF Lee Bailey wasn’t having any bs! I love watching this! He was brilliant! 🙏🏻💐♥️🇺🇸
It’s clear he planted the glove that didn’t fit.
eric Mays kid gloves. Soft leather. It’s absorbent. Blood contracts when dried. Then, it shrinks the gloves too. He also had latex gloves on underneath the leather ones....there was no way those gloves were going to fit. Did OJ’s Bruno Magli shoes walk themselves around the murder scene too?? Lol.
Pommie bears so if his fingers were cut why weren’t the gloves¿
Pommie bears Also do you mean the same shoes the detective took home before entering evidence the next day¿ Why wasn’t their blood on the floor of the bronco? That was a messy job and their are smidges of blood on the dashboard.
eric Mays erm...they didn’t have the shoes in the first trial. It was the civil trial that photographs of him in magazines showed him wearing the shoes. Don’t you know anything about the evidence in this case?? The shoes were never found. But, there were lots of pictures of him wearing them on the sidelines when he was as football. And, it is believed that the glove came off before he cut his finger.....that’s why he only left with one glove. It’s not that hard to fathom. You need to learn more about this case. Who told you the shoes were taken home by a detective or officer?? Lol.
eric Mays and, there was blood in the bronco. On the carpet, centre consul, and door.
1:10:05 I knew Ito (and others) knew what Bailey (and Cochran probably) was doing with their petty word plays and such... Ito actually says something here: "you know how it's pronounced, we all know how it's pronounced"
TURTLEo and PELICANo.
Love the subliminal belittlement of Fuhrman's team. Bailey almost got away with it too. Ito caught it and realized what he was doing... still some impressive, next-level manipulation of the jury.
He knew who she was right away
Furhman taking the 5th , when asked whether he ever planted evidence , was devastating to the case .
Life is short, this seems like only 12 year's ago not 25
yup. time flies!
It sure is. Looking back, this was one of the happiest times in my life!
An interesting little play of words going on here, Fuhrman says he didn't pick the glove up 'at that time'... which the Defense is saying means he DID pick it up at a later time.... if you watch the earlier argument by Marcia, on this same morning before the Jury came in, she was arguing that a report wasn't final because it said "version 1" on it which she esteemed meant there was a version 2. So she was using the exact same argument, just two hours earlier in court.
Yes, of course. ALL of this is word play. They are nitpicking affidavits already given with the intent of tripping someone up with a word here or a word there that during testimony, may be different that what was recored months earlier and BOTH sides know anything different it irrelevant as it wouldn't change the fact that Simpson committed double murder. Both sides. We all know what's going on here. It's not stunning or anything that takes a whole lot of skill. You don't actually think Bailey pored over the dozens or hundreds of pages of interviewing paperwork or records, do you?
Johnie got mad at Bailey for coming to court smelling like a whiskey 🥃
Not correct at all.
@@daviddavis3389 Bailey admit he did that
F Lee Bailey is the smartest man in that room.
Not true. And even if he did, he did better having a whiskey than most attorneys do sober. 🤷🏼♀️
Lee is the kind of guy who would pronounce my last name as Martin-ez.
He’s the kind of guy if anyone treated you wrongly, he would bring out the truth! ❤
Bailey is talking, and acting like he has caught Fuhrman telling lies when in reality he's answering as good as possible. Baileys just asking detailed questions that are extremely hard to recall and answer whether you're telling the truth or not.
I disagree. Bailey was masterful in trapping Furhman and caught him committing perjury. Fact.
yep. and Ito allows Bailey to tear through the past 10 years of Fuhrmans life and grill him on various he-said-she-said scenarios…. It’s stupid and not at all relevant.
@@benicia21 I disagree. No one witnessed Fuhrman find or plant that glove. We are to take his word for it if he is to be believed. The premise of the line of questions in his examination is to establish motive to frame and his credibility. His history is more relevant in determining these two things. Bailey did a masterful job of exposing exactly who Fuhrman is and that he is in fact a liar.
Bailey toasted his racist axzzz. Just admit it lol.
Him pleading the fifth didn't help either
Just curious, so there was one glove found at the scene of the murders correct? So Mark found the match to the glove and planted at Ojs house? Where did Mark find the glove to plant it? I mean the exact same glove? Did he buy it somewhere and plant it in that 15 minutes he was alone?
He supposedly, according to the defense, found both gloves at the scene and then took one to Simpsons house
Yea thats what that racist did
There was one glove at the murder site and the other at rockingham. The defense used the plant bs without evidence because they found tapes of his saying racist things for screen play. Whether he is a racist or not he was still a good detective and there was no to plant that glove because there were other 14 officers at murder scene that saw one glove and knit cap. But it was perfect for the defense to use the race card which was irrelevant but since it was allowed to be used on court by ito it was fair play for the defense to say everthing was planted and tainted with because he is black. Which again I say is complete bs. The dude oj was whitest black man in America 😂.
You should listen to his testimony. He describes it himself. "...that's when I saw them"
@@williebrown2463 he was referring to the one glove and nit cap by Goldmans feet. Just misspoke. Nothing more. There is 0 evidence that he moved a glove
"Sustained," "Denied", "Objection," "Over ruled" lol.."Do you know how to answer the courts questions?"..🤣🤣.lessoned learned here....dont get your prelim twisted against your cross examination given...YOU WILL GET HOOKED!! 🤣🤣😎👀 and look like a fool...And look at Cochran in the background just having a hayday admiring Mr. Bailey, "Dam this man's good!!!". 💪🏻🤫
The truth shall always coming to the light.
Prosecution legitimately had no case
1:00:09 god damn f lee baileys even letting the judge have it looooll BOSSSSSS
@@tfcmls_domination6801 --Innocent.
@@tfcmls_domination6801 a free nigga with his pension coming in every month. Playing golf. Thank you very much
I’ve learned so much from this case I watch it over and over almost every day it realax me and put me to sleep.😮😤👁️👀😵💫😴💰😎👏👍🇺🇸🤠😝
I love it! I watched it as a teen with my parents. I love F Lee Bailey! He brought out the truth! 🙏🏻♥️🇺🇸💐
F. Lee Bailey is the reason I went to Law School.
34:20 Ito literally finishing the peoples objection for them for everyone who complains he did it for the defense.
Then Bailey schools THE JUDGE lol it's amazing to watch
Mark F. seems to lack the expertise of framing the Juice
The Rush started when he was going to plant the glove hahahahaha his hart was racing hoping no one would see him ,what a fucking clown Furman was hahahahaha
fuhrman going, what happen to the OJ trial?
😥😥😥😥😥😥😥😥😥
😂
Lmao! I know right! I'm sure the prosecution team was saying the same thing!!!😅
Why did the prosecution choose not to bring Mark Fuhrman to the witness stand second time? Why did the prosecution object Judge Ito's suggestion as he was going to tell the jurors to extrapolate his evasiveness based on the prosecutions's decision not to bring him to the witness stand? No one can tell me that the jurors were not advised about the prosecution's stern objection. Someone inside must have told something to the sequestered jurors what the heck went on!
I watching this in 2022 btw... This is absolutely fascinating!
Oj wore size 2L gloves. The size of the glove that was found was size L, Which was too small for Oj. The size L was the size that Mark Furman wore.
1:12:10 the look on his face wasn’t like this on the previous lies but this one hit home for him. This man tried to ruin Orenthal and his mixed children life.
Clowns like you make this trial into black comedy 😅😅🤡🤡
OJ is INNOCENT !!
Jason Simpson is the KILLER !!
@TDKiller415 the jury made the right decision💯
Does anyone know whether or not James Simpson was cross-examined?
1:12:20
It’s 1:12:22 😉
F Lee Bailey, he was a genius! 💐🙏🏻♥️🇺🇸 The man, Marine, attorney, brought the truth out!
Old F Lee Bailey loved this day he could repeat his favorite word over & over. 😅
He knew who she wad
I love to watch this back and see F Lee Bailey at work. He was a great attorney!
Lol wow...they should have never let him get questioned. He got ripped apart
what drugs are you on? This guy found the glove, blood on the bronco, 1st on scene at Bundy AND Rockingham.. not call him as a witness at all? what message does that send? the DA wouldnt proceed with the case if that happened. Defence would win off that alone.
Lench Rides i was speaking in regards to ALL things considered , his history with the remarks he stated (racial etc) made him (regardless of what evidence he had discovered at the scene) unreliable as a witness
Praying Mommy - They kind of had to put Mark Fuhrman on the witness stand to direct examine him on the evidence he founded, so he have to be across examine by the defense attorney, Fuhrman was a key witness for the prosecution if you can't or don't put him on the witness stand most likely you're not going to win that case, so why go through with the trial at all if Fuhrman can't or don't take the witness stand to put into evidence all of his evidence he founded
Wen they asked o. J for his blood he shlda said i want a lawyer....
For the recorded introgation he offered immediately when cops told him blood found at his house n car. TH-cam for oj introgation audio
They lost three vials of his blood. Detective V had three vials and took them with him! Why would any detective do that?
This guy lies so much 🙄 and he did not expect Bailey to outwit him. Drinking from that cup of water too much and always says one thing but means another
He lies alot.. you can just sense that he's not a upstanding person, trying to sound soft spoken and honorable. What he doesn't know is a Skilled attorney like Bailey already did his homework on him, and is asking questions that he already knows the answer to. No matter how soft he tries to come off, you can actually sense the anger and lies radiate from him.
@@Ken-iu2zp Very poised like you said and calculated answer. Like when he says through pauses I took notes.But Bailey kept catching him in lies. Like when he wrote at his feet I saw them. Bailey asks him what did u mean by them he's says he was referring to the hat and the glove but in the context he wasnt talking about the hat. Lying all the time he even went on Oprah Winfrey with his Stories and Oprah actually bought his story too
@@romeoshlomo179 She was in it for the sensationalism aspect of it. The reason why she really bought into is also because like most people their minds were made up: Oj is guity. This stems from several things, but mainly if a person is arrested and brought into court on charges, people AUTOMATICALLY think he's guilty. Even if it's unconscious.....
We all have that mindset. I even thought OJ was guilty at 1 point. When I really got into this case and STUDIED it that's when it hit me "Wow he really couldn't have committed these murders".
As far as Furhman. Bailey really disliked this guy and you can sense that as well. The guy was notorious for setting people up. And in 2022, you can't believe it, but people actually overlook that, and still believe he didn't plant evidence even after him admitting that he does that to people.....What a world this is.
who's on trial here, OJ or Mark Fuhrman?
Both.
OJ was acquitted on this day of testimony
Daring Goldman nope...before this. It was a message to the LAPD that people aren’t going to put up with shit anymore. Unfortunately, it meant that Nicole and Ron didn’t get justice. But, it was definitely a message.
Fuhrman really thought he was smart than everyone in that courtroom
1:03:15 Marcia had a crush on Mark for sure 😂
Marcia repudiated everything about Furman..she adamantly distanced himself as far as possible from that Racist clown.
I mean herself from him..she was embarrassed to even try to even accept mark furman's phone calls...she further washed her hands from furball...Marsha may least wasn't a Racist.
I don’t blame her he was hot.
A master at work.
I would not trust that detective any further than I could see him
Mostly humans can see quite accurately for perhaps 200 yards...you mean, only as far as I can I throw him I believe?
Fuhrman wanted to use 16th century classical theater 3 units rule:one place (Los Angeles),one action, 24 hours play.
The late actor pat morita would have made a perfect judge ito in American crime story. Cuba gooding, was not the right guy in playing simpson. Denzel washington should have been the actor to play simpson.
Y
Jose Cienfuegos yeah right Denzel not doing no fx series !! Cuba got it cause he’s only middle age black man that was broke enough to take it was Oj or snow dogs 5 !! Not like Boys in hood 2 coming anytime soon
Lmao f Lee bailey was shitting on the prosecution when he said... less than blistering!
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡 If the jury, and people like you, weren't so stupid and corrupt, the killer would be behind bars. It's okay though. A long time has gone by. Cockroach and F Lee and Kardashian are literally smoldering as I type this, and the murderer and Shapiro will be joining them very soon. All in good time stupid, all in good time.
@@dyates6380 lmao you just mad Oj got the justice white folks get! Out of all the murders and atrocities white folks have committed… I’m amazed (not really) how this Oj case effect y’all! Hilarious
Bailey had Fuhrman by the short hairs in this video
True. He's a very sharp cross examiner
As someone who watched the trial every day at the time, the view of Bailey vs fuhrman at the time was furhman wasn’t fazed and Bailey failed to land any shots. If you read the comments now people think this was some masterpiece by Bailey. The facts was it was only when the fuhrman tapes became known did it all change
F Lee Bailey was the King of cross examination. Watching this is "legal poetry in motion"" . Fuhrman lost this case for them, if another cop was in the stand that had a more credible background OJ was done and dusted . Marcia Clark had a massive job trying to get the jury to put aside Fuhrman's racist comments and see the evidence . We have a lawyer here in New Zealand called Stuart Grieve who is also the King of Cross examination
Hahahaha Oj's face at 24:01😂😅 Furman is a freakin joke!!👎
He always says he didn't mean what he originally said.
Jeez, all these questions that don't mean anything.....unless you're a gullible member of the jury.
Around 58:00 is when Bailey decides to start exposing him a as a racist.
furhrmans NOT A racist cochran is the fucking racist!
@@healthyone100 --Cochron exposed their ass.
But he was setting him up the whole time. The man was brilliant
@greeneyedsoutherngirl6468 yes he was. I was only pointing out that he knew exactly the moment he would flip the switch on him
2024 and these videos are still my bedtime atories
Just when I thought humanity couldn't get any dumber, the comment section of this video comes into my life. I guess the killers are still on the loose, right guys?
They're black supremacists who think Nicole and Ron, two innocent people, were perfect to pay for the crimes against Rodney King and Latasha Harlins.
@@TDKiller415 It has everything to do with the seemingly bottomless pit of hate most blacks have for whites, and little to do with Rodney King or Latasha Harlins. Luckily for blacks, the other "minority" groups also seem to hate whites as much, or more.
@@fmac0417 Well the Chinese are known for hating blacks too. I heard they had to make John Boyega a lot smaller on the Chinese Star Wars sequel trilogy posters so the films wouldn't be boycotted.
AS IF YOU DIDN"T KNOW . YES, GENIUS . THEY ARE STILL OUT THERE.
It’s called reasonable doubt. And there’s plenty of reasonable doubt here.
Hey Jim k if you believe oj hired somebody why was his blood at the scene it always come back to the blood doesn't it buddy
His blood was planted there by vanneter
@@jasonlowe9927 Help me out if you can bc I forgot (if you see this) where did they get oj's blood from? Did he give them a sample?
@@skye-theconspiracyrealist8584 --The conned him to give them his blood.
Planted by police
Fibber
Mark looks like kripki from the big bang theory