Why specifically single out Islam? Your video didn't mention it even once? Also Islam agrees with the big bang theory, it simply places Allah as the cause so the big bang isn't a disproof of religion.
Well, the channel's name is "learn before you convert to islam", hence the singling out. As there's no legitimate proof of the validity of islam , Muslim apologetics keep bringing up the big bang as a proof of the divinity of the Qur'an, and islam by extension.
Let's start with your title... Belief in a supernatural deity is not restricted to Islam, albeit having shared flawed attributes. Science is not about proving or disapproving the existence of God. None of the presented arguments here do either as well. Furthermore your silly facsimiles like with the banana are irrelevant. The laws of the Universe/Nature are definite based on the scales in which they govern. The very fact that they are essential to understanding the functions of matter and energy and their interactions reinforced the idea that without it nothing would make sense. Speaking of which, making sense of it all as science tries to do relies on unchanging laws. Now, what force could you attribute to the ubiquitous tendency of the universe to achieve equilibrium as discovered by science? Surely it wasn't an accident. Thus, you failed to explain origin by diverting attention to the means of discovery which cannot suffice by examining the material world. The biggest problem of theology is that it tries to relate to God with limited human consciousness.
Let me ask you a question.... It's 2025 now. Has the evolution of species stopped? Has the exploration of the cosmos stopped? The answer is , we live in a "blip" of space-time. Science is there to explore, learn, adapt. Religion (s) , are just good ol' dogmas invented by some mentally questionable people. So, when someone like Zakir Naik, who keeps spreading lies about "the scientific miracles of the Qur'an", I just try to remind people to use their intellectual abilities so as not to follow blindly.
@@LB4YCTI Hence my first comment! Spirituality and science are on a par. It would be a mistake to wish for one to confirm the other. Yet they are not necessarily mutually exclusive. One can have a scientific outlook on life and still be spiritual. Just as science is insufficient to prove the existence of god, religion is not meant to be used as a tool for discovery. While origin myths tend to be common to religions, their best service to mankind is through reinforcing social laws and ethics. And since values change from one culture to another and through time, spirituality also tends to evolve.
Hence my original comment! Science and religion are on a par. Science can't prove the existence of God and spiritually is an insufficient tool for discovery. But that doesn't mean that they are mutually exclusive of one another. One can be a scientist and spiritual. Religions tend to have origin myths, but they deal mostly with ethics. And since cultural values differ and change through time, spirituality also evolves with human consciousness.
@@HandyMan-p3t "Their best service to mankind is through reinforcing social laws and ethics" Ah, yeah, like slavery, homophobia, misogyny... Real good argument
Poor arguments used to defy poor arguments!
would you care to explain?
AI generated thumbnail, title and description 💔
Well done 👍🏻
Why specifically single out Islam? Your video didn't mention it even once? Also Islam agrees with the big bang theory, it simply places Allah as the cause so the big bang isn't a disproof of religion.
Well, the channel's name is "learn before you convert to islam", hence the singling out.
As there's no legitimate proof of the validity of islam , Muslim apologetics keep bringing up the big bang as a proof of the divinity of the Qur'an, and islam by extension.
@LB4YCTI that was what i meant. Ur channel name singles out islam but the video doesn't speak about Islam at all?
I see your point.
Total BS. Ignorance points to religion.
Ignorance does indeed do some weird shit.
Let's start with your title... Belief in a supernatural deity is not restricted to Islam, albeit having shared flawed attributes. Science is not about proving or disapproving the existence of God. None of the presented arguments here do either as well. Furthermore your silly facsimiles like with the banana are irrelevant. The laws of the Universe/Nature are definite based on the scales in which they govern. The very fact that they are essential to understanding the functions of matter and energy and their interactions reinforced the idea that without it nothing would make sense. Speaking of which, making sense of it all as science tries to do relies on unchanging laws.
Now, what force could you attribute to the ubiquitous tendency of the universe to achieve equilibrium as discovered by science? Surely it wasn't an accident.
Thus, you failed to explain origin by diverting attention to the means of discovery which cannot suffice by examining the material world.
The biggest problem of theology is that it tries to relate to God with limited human consciousness.
Let me ask you a question.... It's 2025 now.
Has the evolution of species stopped? Has the exploration of the cosmos stopped?
The answer is , we live in a "blip" of space-time.
Science is there to explore, learn, adapt.
Religion (s) , are just good ol' dogmas invented by some mentally questionable people.
So, when someone like Zakir Naik, who keeps spreading lies about "the scientific miracles of the Qur'an", I just try to remind people to use their intellectual abilities so as not to follow blindly.
@@LB4YCTI Hence my first comment!
Spirituality and science are on a par. It would be a mistake to wish for one to confirm the other. Yet they are not necessarily mutually exclusive. One can have a scientific outlook on life and still be spiritual. Just as science is insufficient to prove the existence of god, religion is not meant to be used as a tool for discovery. While origin myths tend to be common to religions, their best service to mankind is through reinforcing social laws and ethics. And since values change from one culture to another and through time, spirituality also tends to evolve.
Hence my original comment!
Science and religion are on a par. Science can't prove the existence of God and spiritually is an insufficient tool for discovery. But that doesn't mean that they are mutually exclusive of one another. One can be a scientist and spiritual.
Religions tend to have origin myths, but they deal mostly with ethics. And since cultural values differ and change through time, spirituality also evolves with human consciousness.
@@HandyMan-p3t
"Their best service to mankind is through reinforcing social laws and ethics"
Ah, yeah, like slavery, homophobia, misogyny... Real good argument
Why is this nonsense recommended to me..smh!
Because you clicked on a video or multiple videos that other users who have clicked on this video have also clicked on.
@rockbark2137 not while I was awake.... anyways.see ya around.
TH-cam algorithm. Doesn't harm to have some insights into different things , does it?