@@joshportie❌ The laws tells you, ‘protects’ you, relatively ‘rewards’ and pays you daily in disorder to break & disobey GOD’s Laws. 🚫You guys care, fear and obey laws SIGNIFICANTLY MORE, if not totally, than you ever obey GOD’s Laws. GOD’s Laws is NOT ‘supreme’: it is the one and only laws, incomparably and immutably. GOD’s Laws is ABSOLUTE. 🛎️I will never be a ‘law abiding citizen’ because I am a Born-Again Bible-Obeying Christian belonging to The Kingdom of Jesus ChrisT i.e. GOD: 🎯I am “in this world” but I am not “of this world”.
@godislord3377 (Psalm 112:1) World English Bible [Praise Yah! Blessed is the man who fears Yahweh, who delights greatly in his commandments.] Young's Literal Translation [Praise ye Jah! O the happiness of one fearing Jehovah, In His commands he hath delighted greatly.] The One True Almighty God, Jah the Father- Yahweh (English-Jehovah) The Almighty God of the 66 inspired canonical books of God's Word the Holy Scriptures. -Isaiah 45:5- WEB [I am Yahweh, and there is (no one else.) Besides me, there is (no God). I will strengthen you, though you have not known me,] [YHWH ] 4 consonants form of the divine name occurring nearly 7000 in Bible .... Reference King David 1100 times Yeshua/Jesus around 330 times. The 66 canonical books of God's inspired word the Holy Scriptures. which biblical scholars to say it means "he causes become", "he becomes anything" "i am anything" - necessary to achieve his will or purpose.. Which indicates His Godly wisdom, power to move events toward his divine will. YHWH, YAH, JAH, YAHWEH, YAHOVAH. [Jehovah- English] Hebrew/ Aramaic words have meaning. Found in hebrew theo-phoric names- Elijah, Adonijah, Yeho-shua, King Yəhōšafat and Prophet Isiah-Yəšaʿyāhū - King Yəhōšafat ("Yahweh has judged") Elijah's name means “Yahweh is my God” John-Jehonathan or Yehōnātān means (Yahweh has given) Jesus name in Hebrew/ Aramaic- Yeshua (Salvation) Yeho-shua ["Joshua"- English] meaning -(Yahweh is Salvation) Jesus name brings glory to the One true Almighty God. ( Exodus 6:3) (Psalm 83:18 ) biblehub.com/psalms/83-18.htm Sha'lom Aleichem in Christ Hallelujah- Praise Almighty Jah you people.
@dennisbrandt8517 The Messianic law is fulfilled in Yeshua Hamashiach (Ps 118:22) [The stone that the builders rejected Has become the chief cornerstone. ] Love the truth. Sha'lom Aleichem in Christ Hallelujah-Praise Almighty Jah, you people.
@GolfnMoreclips "if you love Me then obey My commandments " is pretty clear. No one would obey to be saved but rather because we're saved by His sweet merciful Grace. The law is eternal as He is.
Thank you for this.. I have been doing my own studies in the scriptures and the different bibles that are translations and I am very interested in The Geneva Bible, that is how I found your video. Thank you very much.
Because in the KJV it says to obey your master, and that is likely a wrong translation. I always suspected that someone like the Free Masons got a hold of things and did a few adjustments. I think 1560 Geneva would be my choice. After all, a king doesnt want to lose his seat.
@@philindeblanc It is untrue, and heretical, that Holy King James didn't like the way THE BIBLE calls Kings tyrants. There are whole books in THE BIBLE for Kings, Jésus-Christ i.e. God HIMSELF either appointed, or favoured Kings. Holy David was a King, Holy Solomon was a King, Saul was a King, and Esther was a Queen, to list a few. Jesus ChrisT is "The King of Kings", and "The Lord of Lords" . Do not be deceived: sola scriptura. "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:"Jésus-Christ i.e. God i.e. Adonaï{Authorized Holy King James 1611}
Guys, here is The True Savior HalleluYAH translates “Praise ye YaH” YaH is The Heavenly Father YaH arrives via the TENT OF MEETING YaH was Who they Crucified for our sins YaH was Crucified on an Almond TREE - Ancient Semitic Cuneiform of Moshe (Moses) - Isa Scroll (The Original Isaiah) Isaiah 42:8 "I am YaH; that is my Name! I will not yield my glory to another or my praise to idols. Isaiah 43:11 I, I am YAH, and there is no other Savior but Me. Isaiah 45:5 I am YaH, and there is none else.
I lived in the South in 1950s & never saw or knew about any Geneva Bible. We read the KJV in public school -- Bible reading was state law for public schools.
I just subscribed...I used to live in Moultrie...I live in Oregon now as the tech director for my church. I love this, and find this stuff fascinating. Great video!!!
What a difference even just "should" being taken out for the meaning. I've always been taught "Ye though I WALK.." as if we are doing it rather it before said "Ye though I SHOULD walk" as more of and 'if' or 'when you do'. Because one seems to refer to constantly being in the shadow of death and one seems to refer to it not being a constant thing.
I find the Geneva Bible very exciting! It's a piece of history, and I find it fascinating to observe how the old English was spelled in that version as well as the Tyndale version. I'm also curious how much England still uses some of what we call old spellings and how much of it is even an old spelling for them?
I heard that people in the UK Or in the British Colones (used to be) stil use enlightened... the Canada National Anthem still has the thee's. we still sing hymns with the old english :) saith and says sound the same if you read it :)
I grew up on the 1984 NWT ... Then read the 1984 NIV Zondervan ... Now I use the Doubleday ... But my Grandparents were once Mormon .. Then became Jehovah Witnesses .. I left the JW In 2013 ... And have a Cambridge ... I am here to learn ...
Guys, here is The True Savior HalleluYAH translates “Praise ye YaH” YaH is The Heavenly Father YaH arrives via the TENT OF MEETING YaH was Who they Crucified for our sins YaH was Crucified on an Almond TREE - Ancient Semitic Cuneiform of Moshe (Moses) - Isa Scroll (The Original Isaiah) Isaiah 42:8 "I am YaH; that is my Name! I will not yield my glory to another or my praise to idols. Isaiah 43:11 I, I am YAH, and there is no other Savior but Me. Isaiah 45:5 I am YaH, and there is none else.
I too was raised JW from 3 yrs old and left at 16 and believed just couldn’t do it and thought God was mean. Now I know better and found Jesus Christ and the truth definitely set me free. I have both king James 1611 and Geneva Bible, at one time I had every Bible I could get to compare scripture with scripture, when I was learning my faith was an occult and wrong, n now I got rid of them all except the KJB 1611 and Geneva. Anyway glad you not a JW anymore also. God bless
Amend your ways being more accurate simply requires one to understand that, according to the Bible, salvation is three-fold: 1. Jesus saves us 2. Preachers save us 3. We save ourselves All through the process of "repentance" which most believers think means feeling bad and asking forgiveness. It means changing your mind about something. Repenting of sin means changing one's mind about the desirability of being ruled by sin, or forsaking that terrible task master for the blessing of being a slave of Christ! :o) So far, so good! I'm loving it, and looking forward to getting the Geneva Bible as soon as possible.
The repentance that Jesus commanded is simply changing what you believe. Whatever you trust in now, stop trusting in that and trust in me. Matthew 21:31-32 implies that repentance leads to belief. Hebrews 6:1 says that repentance from dead works is a foundational doctrine of the faith, so it’s safe to say that this is the same repentance Jesus commanded. Jesus commanded the Jews, who trusted in their works of the law, to stop trusting in those dead works, and trust in Him. Repentance of sin for salvation is not required, because that would be works of the law (You turn from lying by obeying the law, you turn from fornication by obeying the law), and we know that we are not saved by our works of the law. God bless brother.
@@thegoodgift Repentance from sin is absolutely, essentially, and foundationally essential to salvation. To repent because the law says so, and you want to earn God's favor, is doing a work of the law. To repent because Jesus Christ commanded it is not a work of the law. Christians are to obey the commandments of Jesus Christ, even when they parallel the commands of the law. Jesus says to love God with all your heart. Is that a work of the law? God forbid! We are not saved by our works, and we cannot be saved without them.
@@busker153 How to be saved and have eternal life: 1. Realize that you, like everybody else, is a wicked sinner. (1 John 1:8) "If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us." 2. The penalty for sin is death. (Romans 6:23) "For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." 3. Everybody's flesh will die, but our soul has to pay for our sins too. Because of this we all deserve to go to hell, and on the day of judgement, hell will be tossed into the eternal lake of fire. This is the second death. (Revelation 20:14) "And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death." 4. But God loves us so much, that he doesn't want us to go through this, He wants us to live with Him for eternity. So He sent Jesus Christ, the perfect image of God, to save us. (John 3:16) "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." 5. Jesus Christ lived a perfect life with no sin. Because of this, and the fact that He is God in the flesh, He was the perfect sacrifice to pay for the sins of the whole world; past, present, and future. When He died on the cross, this is exactly what He did. After He died He was buried, and on the third day He rose again, proving that He was the messiah. This is THE GOSPEL. (1 Corinthians 15:1-4) 6. This is God's free gift to us. The gift of eternal life, and of escape from hell and the second death. All we have to do to receive this gift is BELIEVE THE GOSPEL. We DO NOT get into heaven by our own merit. The only thing that justifies us before God is our faith in the finished work of Jesus Christ. (Ephesians 2:8-9) "For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: not of works, lest any man should boast." 7. Jesus promises that whosoever believes on Him will never come into condemnation. This means that once you believe the gospel, you are forever secured in Him. There is nothing you can do to lose your salvation. (John 5:24) "Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life." This is how to get saved according to the bible. Works (i.e. turning from sin, good deeds, etc.) DO NOT play a part in your salvation. Our righteousness is as filthy rags to the Lord (Isaiah 64:6), so we have to depend on the righteousness of Jesus. His righteousness is the only righteousness that pleases God. This is His free gift to us all why not just accept it right now by faith? What do you have to lose? This life is temporary but there are eternal consequences at stake. God bless you.
A very interesting difference I found in the 1599 Geneva Bible (first printed in 2006 by Tolle Legge Press, with modern lettering and spelling) is that where Jesus said to call no man rabbi, He said to call no man doctor.
@@Lexie810-b5r No, it's not. If the Mandela effect has any truth in it (which I doubt), it would NOT be able to change God's Word unless HE wanted to change it -- and He has stated that His Word does NOT change. However I looked again and saw that I had not read it correctly. What He said was, Matthew 23 (1599 Geneva): 8 But be not ye called, Rabbi: for one is your doctor, to wit, Christ, and all ye are brethren. 9 And call no man your father upon the earth: for there is but one, your father which is in heaven. 10 Be not called doctors: for one is your doctor, even Christ. 11 But he that is greatest among you, let him be your servant. I find it interesting that actually Jesus said basically, "Don't YOU have others call you Rabbi, or doctor or father. The "father" one to me is tricky, since He obviously didn't mean we should not call our biological father our father -- but look what the "Catholic church" did: they have people call ALL of their many thousands of priests "Father this" and "Father that" and "the Father." DIRECT DISOBEDIENCE TO CHRIST all day long. Just that one thing alone should be enough for people to realize they must get OUT of that apostate institution, but there are many other reasons that don't take a whole lot of effort to learn once you ALLOW yourself to look at that institution critically.
@@Lexie810-b5r No. It is misunderstandings. Those who want to deceive the whole world have subtly and slowly caused it to SEEM that way. Look into the history and you will find it NEVER said the lion will lay with the lamb, BUT and artist (using "artistic license" drew it that way and it became a famous painting) plus someone wrote a hymn for churches saying the same thing. Both the artist and the hymn writer may easily have been like so many today who DO NOT READ their Bibles but just believe what people TELL them is in the Bible. Lions and lambs are BOTH mentioned in that same paragraph or chapter, just never as "lion and the lamb" (and if it is, it is a bad translation).
I have a parallel Bible....it has 4 versions in it. Kjv, Rsv, the living bible, and the modern language Bible. Guidepost 1973. Love the kjv for the poetic flow. Helps to read the others sometimes.
1599 geneva is tainted. they removed key commentary in it. stick with 1560. for instance rev 20:8 removes who gog and magog were according to the authors of 1560. it was the turks, saracens and other enemies of the true church. there are many more instances
Bad. Revelation 13 16 in the new geneva replaces IN the right hand to ON the right hand. IN SPECIFICALLY MEANS SOMETHING INSIDE YOUR HAND UNDER THE SKIN! On could be a tattoo or something.
Fun FACT : the 1611 kjv and the Geneva bible have scriptural references to the apocrypha. Like Jesus referencing Matthew 24:37, Hebrew 1135 references to the people tortured and waiting for a better resurrection.
I can read the Geneva yet the 1611 KJV still is hard for me to read. Even told that I'm not saved because of it. Called the Son of the devil. Yes I know that I'm saved.
"I always wondered why my mom licked her fingers. Now I know." That literally cracked me up! A true blast from the past. I remember seeing people do that, and wondered the same thing. LOL
God is the genuine and sole author of this Book we call the Bible. Because only one who knows the end from the beginning could have foretold those things that came to pass, exactly as the prophets had predicted.
They interchanged i and j depending on how the word was used in the sentence. The j sound always existed in Old English. It was around the 14th Century, and I can't remember the guy's name who put a little hook on the i to stipulate he wanted the j sound, and that stuck. People began to do the same. The Holy Ghost is not a separate person. (Mark 12:29-31). If you see Jesus; you see God. John 14:6-7; John 1:1-5; John 4:24; John 5;43; John 8:23; John 8:58; Matt. 28:18-20; Col. 1:15-20; Rev.1: 8,18, Rev. 22 AKJVNT
But Christ did say he would send us the Holy Spirit to be a comforter to us. So how can they be the same? The trinity teaching is a gentile teaching that was not reckognized by the Apostles and the early church. It came through the Greco Roman teachings much later, nearly a century a.d. Also, Christ was black. That’s why the Bible says the apostles (Peter, John, and James) were first called “niger” at Antioch. Niger means black, and that’s where we get the “N” word today. So if Christ’s disciples were black men, what color was Christ? Black. I hope this helps you Sir. God Speed
@@Staystrong4Life1111 You probably need to re-read that Scripture reference. There's Only One God = Jesus. And No, the Apostles never recognized a trinity teaching. Oh, and John 1:1-5; John 4:24; John 14:6-7; Rev. 1:8,18. Acts 2:38 saves. AKJVNT I hope this helps you, Sir. 😄
@DianeOfori The One True Almighty God, Jah the Father- Yahweh (English-Jehovah) The Almighty God of the 66 inspired canonical books of God's Word the Holy Scriptures. -Isaiah 45:5- WEB [I am Yahweh, and there is (no one else.) Besides me, there is (no God). I will strengthen you, though you have not known me,] [YHWH ] 4 consonants form of the divine name occurring nearly 7000 in Bible .... Reference King David 1100 times Yeshua/Jesus around 330 times. The 66 canonical books of God's inspired word the Holy Scriptures. which biblical scholars to say it means "he causes become", "he becomes anything" "i am anything" - necessary to achieve his will or purpose.. Which indicates His Godly wisdom, power to move events toward his divine will. YHWH, YAH, JAH, YAHWEH, YAHOVAH. [Jehovah- English] Hebrew/ Aramaic words have meaning. Found in hebrew theo-phoric names- Elijah, Adonijah, Yeho-shua, King Yəhōšafat and Prophet Isiah-Yəšaʿyāhū - King Yəhōšafat ("Yahweh has judged") Elijah's name means “Yahweh is my God” John-Jehonathan or Yehōnātān means (Yahweh has given) Jesus name in Hebrew/ Aramaic- Yeshua (Salvation) Yeho-shua ["Joshua"- English] meaning -(Yahweh is Salvation) Jesus name brings glory to the One true Almighty God. ( Exodus 6:3) (Psalm 83:18 ) biblehub.com/psalms/83-18.htm Sha'lom Aleichem in Christ Hallelujah- Praise Almighty Jah you people.
I just bought the Geneva 1560 Bible. I was surprised how large it is! Appreciate your video on this subject. Love my KJV always. Just curious how it compares with the Geneva Bible.
The 1500 Mathew version is the best in my opinion. Because it's the most hated version there is. You can't even find it's translation when merely googling it. Because it says flat earth in it in Samuel 2nd. I have a vid on it myself. ❤ The flat earth literally opened my eyes to Gods existence. He showed me his creations in way's I can't deny his intelligent design. The pure symmetries of everything. How molecules & even scaling up to whole designs like a human. Pure symmetry through & through. Perfect shapes & even mathematics to reference the side's of all things. Example like how everything just about has 2 eyes. 2 hands. 2 Feet. & Even beyond that the star constellations the way they're set like a clock in the skies never changing even from ancient cultures till modern day. Psalms 19.1 the heavens declare the glory of God & the firmament showeth his handiwork. Frequencies creating the same geometries as molecule collections with breathtaking Precision. As though God Spoke everything into existence with Frequencies. The subject on Symmetries of creation can no doubt be proof of a creator. God almighty does indeed exist. & The way all laws of physics & frequency & vibration & electromagnetism work in unison like a machine suggests the world is a complex computer a mechanism made up of different elements come together to create a machine set with specific Boundaries & rules to it's design. As though this could really be a simulation. But not in the sense that everyone & everything is a digital rendering. It's far more complex then that. Every electron & atom & molecule work's perfectly in unison together almost as though they're Sentient & intelligent & come together to create silicon based life forms & beyond. I'm not saying we live in the matrix but I'm not saying we're not in it either. God's designs can't be summed up in a context made by men. Not myself nor any scholar. Job 38:4-11 King James Version (KJV) - Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? Declare, if thou hast understanding. I feel absolutely Humbled by his handiwork. God's unfathomably awesome. Can't people see the forest for the trees anymore. Are so many so lost they can't see when God created this world it was Good. It was corrupted by the fallen & their children whom are still in charge of the world today. As in the day's of Noah So shall it be again. The world can't be fixed by apathetic behavior. Every individual must account for his or her own situation in life. For any scenario imaginable. A solution must be drawn. Where would human advancement be without investigation & discovery through hard diligent passion for their trade. God's grace & mercy are boundless. For the wickedness this world has seen & continues to see while seeking knowledge can't be measured. All lifeforms are energy. Energy can't be destroyed it can only transform. Is not the spirit the same. It being like an energy changes from clinging to it's flesh to ascension or descension. These words are the conclusion to over a decade of consistent research into well pretty much everything. Namely the truth & what aligns itself with biblical scriptures. This subject can not be articulated precisely. God's creation is beyond any mortal mind's comprehension.
KJV is 7th ♥️ Translated into English. Psalms 12 kJV 6 The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. 7 Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever. KJV is perfect ♥️ Hebrews 5 KJV 9 And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him;
Yes, even after having been allowed to SEE the events taking form and the movement of life shaping our time-line, I still can't comprehend it all. Absolutely the most amazing journey ❤️
Romans 9:5(Geneva bible)Of whom are the fathers, and of whom concerning the flesh, Christ came, who is God over all, blessed forever, Amen. Rom 9:5 KJV Whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen.
The Sovereign Lord of the universe is not anonymous. He has identified himself some 7,000 times in the Bible as Jehovah. He attributes vital importance to his name. The third of the Ten Commandments states: “You must not take up the name of Jehovah your God in a worthless way, for Jehovah will not leave the one unpunished who takes up his name in a worthless way.” And Jesus highlighted his Father’s name in the Lord’s Prayer, saying, “Let your name be sanctified.”-Exodus 20:7; Matthew 6:9. Christendom’s record in honoring God’s name is dismal. Even the King James Bible of 1611 uses the name Jehovah, alone and in combination, only seven times. Other translations have totally eliminated the name. Most religions fail to honor it. Instead, they have elevated their “holy” Trinity and, in some cases, Mary the so-called Mother of God above the God of the Bible. Jehovah’s precious name has been allowed to sink into relative disuse. The King James Bible has already been changed; today no one reads the King James Version in its original form. Explaining why this is so the book The Bible in Its Ancient and English Versions says: “Almost every edition, from the very beginning, introduced corrections and unauthorized changes and additions, often adding new errors in the process. The edition of 1613 shows over three hundred differences from 1611. . . . It was in the eighteenth century, however, that the main changes were made. . . . The marginal references were checked and verified, over 30,000 new marginal references were added, the chapter summaries and running headnotes were thoroughly revised, the punctuation was altered and made uniform in accordance with modern practice, textual errors were removed, the use of capitals was considerably modified and reduced, and a thorough revision made in the form of certain kinds of words.” So many changes have been made, many of them in the readings of passages, that the Committee on Versions (1851-56) of the American Bible Society found 24,000 variations in six different editions of the King James Version! What, then, of the objections raised by persons who say they do not want the King James Bible changed? Since the King James Version has already been changed, they lie on a crumbled foundation. If these persons do not want it changed, then why do they use, instead of a copy of an edition of 1611, an edition that has been changed? They use a present-day edition of the King James Bible because it is far easier to read. They appreciate, perhaps unknowingly, the improvements the later editions have made. They do not like the odd spelling and punctuation of the 1611 edition; they do not want to read “fet” for “fetched,” “sith” for “since” or “moe” for “more,” as the edition of 1611 had it. Thus improvement, when needed, is appreciated, even by those who say they object to any changing of the King James translation. No, God himself authorizes his dedicated servants to translate his Word into understandable language. The fact that King James authorized a Bible translation does not make it the exclusive version that the Author of the original Bible approves his servants to use in any one language. In fact, kingly authorization, instead of great benefits, has brought serious disadvantages. King James set forth certain rules of procedure. These the translators followed. One of those rules was that “the old Ecclesiastical words [were] to be kept.” Thus the translators were bound to follow the Bishop’s Bible in using certain ecclesiastical words, whether or not these words represented an accurate translation of the original Bible. For example, the ecclesiastical word “bishop” appears in the King James Version, although the original word, correctly translated, merely means “overseer.” In many respects the beliefs of King James adversely affected the Bible translation called after his name. The translators, feeling somewhat bound to favor the king, were obliged to color the translation with the king’s notions of predestination and kingly rights, as well as with others of the king’s ideas. It is also apparent from the fact that some of the translators complained that they could not follow their own judgment, being restrained by “reasons of state.” The result: the King James Version is not a true reflection of the minds of the translators of the version. Above all, it comes far short of being a faithful reflection of the mind of Jehovah God, as it appears in the original manuscripts.
I didn't quite get the point of the review entirely. The video title certainly towed me in and I had to have a look at the comments so I did watch the whole thing. Got a couple of videos of similar subject you and others might enjoy having a look at here on TH-cam both I found fascinating. The 1st one is an old video with Walter Veith titled "Why So Many Bible Versions? The UNTOLD Dark History of Bible Translations | Battle of the Bibles" it's on the Amazing Discoveries channel and the other is "The 1611th Mention of LORD (And Why It's a Really Big Deal)" channel Truth is Christ.
In my opinion kingdoms changed it due to the ephesians scripture,He removed the part about the kings and rulers of this world..and changed it to, We wrestle not against flesh and blood but against spiritual darkness in high places.i know im not exact but I hope 2 see that comparison in this video.
I have both bibles and the same context is there. Yes there is one word missing, well not missing but a different word put in, which means the same thing. I went thru scripture with scripture and the KJB1611 is accurate and even states they used the Geneva Bible but made it easier for people to read. I had every translation and I kept both the kjb1611 and the Geneva. Geneva is very hard to read so I do primarily use the KJB 1611 the newer Kjb and NKJB bibles are definitely messed with and context is changed.
@@lisaromano9086 The geneva Bible has more than 1 word change, it took out worldly Governors line in KJV that is a fact. Anyone can look it up and clearly see its different. The original verses weren't talking about other worldly beings it was talking about Govs and rulers of this world working for the dark
I have a 1611 edition KJV Bible. It's a fascinating piece of history and reading God's word through the lense of Christians from that time has a powerful punch to it.
ya boi king james was a flamer and a catholic, NOT a christian. he was giving all his butt buddies their own kingdoms (like george buckingham, u ever heard of buckingham palace?? alot of ungodly things happened there) the only reason he had the bible made for the english folk was to get them off his azz bc they knew he was corrupt. He also took much of the bible out. I WOULDNT BE TALKIN TO HIGHLY OF KING JAMES, HE WAS OPPOSITE OF A CHRISTIAN, OH WELL I AINT CASTIN STONES , JUST CALLIN IT LIKE IT IS
The Geneva Bible was influnced by John Calvin. Notes were placed in the Geneva Bible. Predestination,unconditional election,total depravity, etc. go back to Augustine, who influnced Whycliff and Calvin. Calvin had fifty five people burned at the stake in Geneva. For disagreement of his doctrine.
@@FisherKot They’re both excellent translations, I would just say the KJV is better translated. It had far more time and translators involved with it for instance.
I like the way you say people just don't understand English. It was not harsh or accusatory; simply factual, and presented as a natural part of the explaination. Very skillful presentation of a harsh fact with gentle speech; most impressive. The use of capital letters for things like the word Name are clearly interpretive, as the original Greek and Hebrew texts did not have any lowercase letters. A little known fact that cracks me up, to be honest. So, I never get hung up on caps verses lowercase. I have decided to read the Geneva Bible next, but am not sure which version to buy. Should I get a 1560 because it is the best (I do not know if it is or not at this point), or the 1599 for the same potential reason? If readability of language and type font are not an issue (I love the language of the KJV -- or is it the K I V ? Couldn't resist!), would you have an opinion as to which one I should buy first?
@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa I have a feeling I am going to like it, too! Thank you for your reply. I am probably going to get a 1599 first, but I do feel a desire to read that olde english.
I was following along with my new NIV, and was pleased to find that though the wording is much more modern (easier reading flow for me) it's still in alignment with the fundamental message. That's what truly matters. I would like to have one of those old replicas though. The historical implication cannot be overstated. Christians gave a lot to bring the word of God to this land. I thank God for that!
HEY! The Niv is a wicked modern modern translation God can still reach you through it but it is not his perfect word. Hundreds of changes that take out the reverence of the blood of Jesus Christ. Keep reading the word happy new year! God made the universe he can delivers a truly perfect Bible. The world hates the kjv not because its difficult its not. Its perfect a true feat of God in this church age to flood the earth with his word !
@@briant1976 well that’s interesting considering the original writings of the Bible were in Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic. The King James was written in old English, and if you were paying attention to the video King James had parts of the Bible altered to fit his agenda. It’s hilarious that people watch movies about the Bible and think they all spoke like they’re straight out of Buckingham Palace. 😂
@@GD-tn3ez no thr original writings were scriptures there was no Bible. The holy Bible was created by God using men. To last the ages seems God knew that Greek and Hebrew were dead languages. Seems God knows everything. Hey not here to fight. The word is perfect the word was God! No updated needed
@@GD-tn3ez The NIV comes from the Alexandrian Text (Codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus) and not from the Textus Receptus that the KJV used for transcription. Those scholars were well aware of the Codex Vaticanus and rejected it. Many of the main modern Bible translations use the Greek New Testament from Westcott and Hort, in which these two hated the KJV and were involved in the occult. Also, coming from this product came the Nestle-Aland Greek New Testament, which has went through 28 revisions since its inception. There may be many similarities between modern versions and the KJV but those subtle differences have increased over the years. The Alexandrian Texts have only been accepted by their age and only dated by their writings but the old scholars in the 1800s still rejected it by their errors and writings that did not fully match the era.
@@n9wff Cool...So anyway....every verse that I weigh against the Geneva Bible of 1599 (which obviously predates the KJV of 1611) has been in alignment. God bless. 🙂
49yr old southern Baptist preachers LAST child.... Recently found God(49) and realized that MOST of the 'truths' I thought I knew as fact were NOT facts! Jesus is the answer! The rest is noise or history. Still learning what the TRUTH actually is!
Financed by the English congregation at Geneva, the Bible was first printed in Geneva in 1560. Royal permission was obtained from Queen Elizabeth for its printing in England. In the eighty-four years of its publication, some 140 editions of the Geneva Bible or New Testament were produced. 140 editions in 84 years … They needed to get it right hence the kjv …
Explain if the scriptures say “no other name” how can one be saved or baptized in another translated name? Is the name the angels, his mother and the name the apostles baptized in to hard to say? I have a name I was given at birth. If you go to the bank or anywhere else that will only except my birth name and try to use a nickname they not going to except it? Acts 2: 12Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other NAME under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved. Matt 1: 21And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call HIS NAME ( the angel called Him Yeshua: Yah is Salvation). JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins. Proverbs 30: 4Who hath ascended up into heaven, or descended? who hath gathered the wind in his fists? who hath bound the waters in a garment? who hath established all the ends of the earth? what is HIS NAME and what is HIS SON’S NAME, if thou canst tell?
I have both.in the Geneva ( I have the Patriots edition) I don't read the comments on the verses.i want God's inspired verses only.id feal the same way if my King James had commentary.
I had the 1611 KJV produced by Hendrickson, bad production with words duplicated in text that are only supposed to be there once, all throughout that edition.
Do you know of the verse in the Geneva bible mentioning "governours", saying something to the effect of, they are not good? I have a Geneva bible and had read that verse a while back and cannot find it again. Someone online mentioned this and I neglected to write it down or mark it in my Bible. Thank you for any help!
"Governnous" is not in Geneva Bible; it is gouernours (expect u used for the letter we call "v". Eph. 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, and against the worldly gouernours, the princes of the darkenesse of this worlde, against spirituall wickednesses, which are in ye hie places. ASV 1901: For our wrestling is not against flesh and blood, but against the principalities, against the powers, against the world-rulers of this darkness, against the spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places. Greek USB-4: ὅτι οὐκ ἔστιν ἡμῖν2 ἡ πάλη πρὸς αἷμα καὶ σάρκα, ἀλλὰ πρὸς τὰς ἀρχάς, πρὸς τὰς ἐξουσίας, πρὸς τοὺς κοσμοκράτορας τοῦ σκότους τούτου, πρὸς τὰ πνευματικὰ τῆς πονηρίας ἐν τοῖς ἐπουρανίοις. Greek NA28, showing textual variations: ὅτι οὐκ ἔστιν ⸀ἡμῖν ἡ πάλη πρὸς αἷμα καὶ σάρκα ἀλλὰ πρὸς τὰς ⸂ἀρχάς, πρὸς τὰς ἐξουσίας⸃, πρὸς τοὺς κοσμοκράτορας τοῦ σκότους ⸆ τούτου, πρὸς τὰ πνευματικὰ τῆς πονηρίας ⸋ἐν τοῖς ἐπουρανίοις⸌. The Textual Variations shown in NA28: • 12 ⸀ υμιν 𝔓46 B D✱ F G Ψ 81. 1175 it vgms syp; Lcf Ambst Spec ¦ txt ℵ A D2 I K L P 0278. 33. 104. 365. 630. 1241s. 1505. 1739. 1881. 2464 𝔐 ar g✱ vg syh co; Cl Or |
VARIATION BETWEEN "TO YOU" (YOUR) & "TO US" (OUR); YOUR WRESTLING & OUR WRESTLING ⸂ μεθοδιας 𝔓46 | APPARENTLY 1 ANCIENT MANUSCRIPT HAS A DIFFERENT WORD FROM PALE ("wrestling") ⸆ του αιωνος ℵ2a D2 K L P Ψ 81. 104. 365. 630. 1241s. 1505. 1739mg. 1881. 2464 𝔐 syh✱✱; Tert ¦ txt 𝔓46 ℵ✱.2b A B D✱ F G 0278. 6. 33. 1175. 1739txt latt syp co; Cl Or Eus |
VARIATION APPARENTLY BETWEEN TOU AIONOS (OF THE AGE) & ITS OMISSION (OF THE DARKNESS THIS AGE vs OF THIS DARKNESS). ⸋ 𝔓46; Did 1K 15,50! 1,21! 1,3! One ancient manuscript omits ἐν τοῖς ἐπουρανίοις (IN THE HEAVENLIES) -
Christians people please read). Jesus said; "If u love Me keep My Commandments", so read this; We have to obey God's Ten Commandments, and keep the Sabbath Day Holy, not Sunday (day) but Sabbath Day on Saturday it's on the Seventh Day of the week amen amen and amen ❤. The Sabbath Day for the people of God, so if you not belong to God then you don't need to keep the Sabbath Day Holy). Wait judgment Day and u will see what happen next. 😢 ..... .... ..... ..... ..... .....
If you were under the Sabbath you would be able to judge someone but you're not able to judge no one about the Sabbath. It's not a salvation issue you didn't rightly divided.
If I was an alien and I found myself in a bookstore and I've never read any books before I believe I would pick up a Bible and take that book first. I imagine I would start reading and think... What is this stuff? I'm going to download the Geneva Bible. God bless you as well.
Both Bibles are from the same line of manuscripts, uncorrupted Antioch manuscripts. Different than the corrupted Alexandrian manuscripts most new bibles today come from.
I don't believe there is anything that isn't corrupted. Perhaps the manuscripts are better than the English translations, but it's very naive to think there's a perfect version as they've all been tampered with for whatever agendas.
@@stevethompson9615Love the brilliant NIV. Much stronger on the deity of Christ and the Holy Spirit than the KJV. No matter what blasphemous idolatrous trash the KJV only cult say
How are the Alexandrian manuscripts corrupted? How are the manuscripts from Antioch uncorrupted? Usual unsubstantiated accusations with no evidence. Alexandria where the deity of Christ and the doctrine of the trinity was defended. Antioch where the Arianism heresies were taught. That Jesus was a created being. Just had the Jehovah Witnesses teach. One of the traits of the KJV only cult is wilful ignorance and double standards.
Thank you for your video im looking forward to getting a Geneva bible, I think of rev 22:18-19 when I think of changing words or removing things so I'd like to stay close to the orginal as possible. One fault I found is Jesus is certainly not his original name, it was Yeshua which means Savior in Hebrew. That would have been how everyone addressed him and the name he went by. Jesus is an English term so probably best not to infer that your audience doesn't understand English
In Greek it was Iesous so Jesus is a English form if that. If you see the Greek its not that far. People get saved in Jesus name all the time. My name is Sarah but if someone in spanish calls me Sada I understand they are still speaking to me.
Demons run when I call on Jesus name. I know his name is Yeshua in Hebrew and everyone spoke Hebrew before Nirmrod got everyone building the tower of Babel so no matter what when Father God had to confuse everyone's language as the were disobediant and trying to make war again heaven, Father God still created all the languages everywhere when He had to split mankind apart so they would spread out across the earth and be fruitful and multiply as He has had commanded in the begining. X
✟ For I will pour water upon him that is thirsty, and floods upon the dry ground: I will pour my spirit upon thy seed, and my blessing upon thine offspring: Isaiah 44:3 (KJV)
My impression is that most modern men consider repentance to mean being sorry for doing something sinful. 2 Cor. 7 proves that this was wrong thinking that even existed when Paul was writing.
its funny, when we cry we enter a state in which our neurons can rewire. This is why we only cry once about things because our brain, while crying, rewires to adjust and accomodate whatever we were crying about. Repentance actually means change of mind. When we are sorry for our sins, so much that we cry unto our lord about having committed them, thats when we can say we truely repented, because even on a physical level we know that we changed our mind. Ita amazing ❤
@@bigtobacco1098 ESV, and almost all modern Bibles use the Gnostic gospels and texts of Alexandria Egypt. I'd stick with God's WORD, the Authorized KJB. Textus Receptus or RECEIVED TEXT. They were FIRST called CHRISTIANS at ANTIOCH, NOT ALEXANDRIA EGYPT, home of Gnosticism and Luciferianism.
@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa Please help me, I'm looking for the oldest English translation possible. This is the age the great book of Revelation spoke of where even GOD'S own elect would be decieved if not for HIS return. I'm just a lowly sinner so image my plight.
One point of significant difference is in Romans 3:23. (There is a slight difference in the verse division) Geneva: For there is no difference: for all have sinned, and are deprived of the glory of God, KJV: For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; It seems that there is a shift in the translation in the KJV with the various pre-KJV translation expressing some sort of barrier to the glory of God.
Thank you, very interesting stuff. It would be nice to hear a little about Martin Luther in the 15th Century,,,i have come to the understanding that the Catholic Church was more cathartic to the deaf, dumb, and blind in things such as rosaries and statues. I learned that Martin Luther was about not putting faith in graven images, or paying tithes to them, as the church opened the doors as Simon selling tickets to heaven for 20 pieces of silver, and in that supplication came Simon Peter, with eyes to see, ears to hear, and a mouth to speak. Thank you King James,,,for right and left top English,,we now have brail ! - Praise be !!
Aw man if you have an interest in Martin Luther then you should also look into Jan Hus and the Hussite Wars. Basically laid the foundation for everthing Martin Luther accomplished.
I think John 3:36 has a very interesting difference. In the Geneva (1599 Tolle Lege) one MUST obey Jesus; in the KJV obedience is not even mentioned in this verse: Geneva 1599: "He that believeth in the Son, hath everlasting life, and he that obeyeth not the Son, shall not see life, but the wrath of God abideth on him." King James: He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him. (In my studies of scripture I have come to believe that the two most important things followers of Jesus must do are TRUST and OBEY him.)
Yes indeed. I looked up and compared these verses, and it is absolutely so written. I have a 1560 Geneva Bible and it is basically not hard to read. I am definitely not a KJV only believer. There seems to be a pattern, I've noticed the newer the translations, the more is changed, rewritten, or just removed entirely. Hmm?
@@kinnonmoss- Yes there was scripture removed entirely from the Bible. Some scriptures that were removed are brought back to us in the book of Mormon, it's part of the restoration. A lot of people really don't understand what that book is about. I know what the testimony of the two witnesses will be, rather soon too imo. If you or anyone cares to know, I've posted my first two videos explaining their testimony. I also explain the witness/prophet like Moses in greater detail as well. I do not however support the LDS church, with their false prophet and false doctrines surrounding the book of Mormon. God bless
People spend their entire lives studying and nitpicking every verse, every word, in the Bible, and not really get the providential meanings that are in the Bible.
@@DiscernmentNow The Jews during Jesus time did the same thing. That's a reason they rejected the messiah because they didn't understand the providence at that time.
It was Puritan John Reynolds who submitted the idea of the making of a better Translation to the King at the Hampton Conference in Jan of 1604. Side by side and line upon line there is no comparison of the Geneva Bible (1569 or 1599) with the Authorized Version of 1611. The “Translation” had to be made on THAT Island, not upon the continent in Switzerland. Gen 10:5; Acts 16:11
No you're wrong, Yashua was pronounced just as it is written, not Jesus which nobody used in those days. Jesus is Greek and Yashua is Hebrew for Ya or YHWH saves. Just like Joshua.
@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa Taking the "Ya" out of his real name is like taking the Ya out of JeremiYA and ObidiYA, ZachariYA, etc etc. Jesus was not his name therefore it makes no difference if the "i" was pronounced as a "j" in this case (and the case you made). In this instance, it is immense that the J sound is not used as it was many many years later projected to do. Greek and Hebrew were phonetic languages with phonetic alphabets. One letter did not have to totally different sounds. It was later that the J sound was used . This is all intertwined with the word "Jew" which had nothing to do with Yehudah, it's nothing but deception and twist speak. Iudea was pronounced Yudea. Now all we have to do is distinguish Iudeans from Yehudah like Caiaphas and Herod for instance were Iudeans, but not Yahudim. Yes it goes right where you will never go.
I speak Hebrew. There is no "J" in that language. The letter J was the last letter added to the Aleph Bet (alphabet). His name was definitely Yashua (Joshua). Jesus in Latin means "earth pig". Everyone stops at the translation of Jesus on Greek which is Zeus, but its deeper than what YOU BELIEVE.
The Sovereign Lord of the universe is not anonymous. He has identified himself some 7,000 times in the Bible as Jehovah. He attributes vital importance to his name. The third of the Ten Commandments states: “You must not take up the name of Jehovah your God in a worthless way, for Jehovah will not leave the one unpunished who takes up his name in a worthless way.” And Jesus highlighted his Father’s name in the Lord’s Prayer, saying, “Let your name be sanctified.”-Exodus 20:7; Matthew 6:9. Christendom’s record in honoring God’s name is dismal. Even the King James Bible of 1611 uses the name Jehovah, alone and in combination, only seven times. Other translations have totally eliminated the name. Most religions fail to honor it. Instead, they have elevated their “holy” Trinity and, in some cases, Mary the so-called Mother of God above the God of the Bible. Jehovah’s precious name has been allowed to sink into relative disuse. The King James Bible has already been changed; today no one reads the King James Version in its original form. Explaining why this is so the book The Bible in Its Ancient and English Versions says: “Almost every edition, from the very beginning, introduced corrections and unauthorized changes and additions, often adding new errors in the process. The edition of 1613 shows over three hundred differences from 1611. . . . It was in the eighteenth century, however, that the main changes were made. . . . The marginal references were checked and verified, over 30,000 new marginal references were added, the chapter summaries and running headnotes were thoroughly revised, the punctuation was altered and made uniform in accordance with modern practice, textual errors were removed, the use of capitals was considerably modified and reduced, and a thorough revision made in the form of certain kinds of words.” So many changes have been made, many of them in the readings of passages, that the Committee on Versions (1851-56) of the American Bible Society found 24,000 variations in six different editions of the King James Version! What, then, of the objections raised by persons who say they do not want the King James Bible changed? Since the King James Version has already been changed, they lie on a crumbled foundation. If these persons do not want it changed, then why do they use, instead of a copy of an edition of 1611, an edition that has been changed? They use a present-day edition of the King James Bible because it is far easier to read. They appreciate, perhaps unknowingly, the improvements the later editions have made. They do not like the odd spelling and punctuation of the 1611 edition; they do not want to read “fet” for “fetched,” “sith” for “since” or “moe” for “more,” as the edition of 1611 had it. Thus improvement, when needed, is appreciated, even by those who say they object to any changing of the King James translation. No, God himself authorizes his dedicated servants to translate his Word into understandable language. The fact that King James authorized a Bible translation does not make it the exclusive version that the Author of the original Bible approves his servants to use in any one language. In fact, kingly authorization, instead of great benefits, has brought serious disadvantages. King James set forth certain rules of procedure. These the translators followed. One of those rules was that “the old Ecclesiastical words [were] to be kept.” Thus the translators were bound to follow the Bishop’s Bible in using certain ecclesiastical words, whether or not these words represented an accurate translation of the original Bible. For example, the ecclesiastical word “bishop” appears in the King James Version, although the original word, correctly translated, merely means “overseer.” In many respects the beliefs of King James adversely affected the Bible translation called after his name. The translators, feeling somewhat bound to favor the king, were obliged to color the translation with the king’s notions of predestination and kingly rights, as well as with others of the king’s ideas. It is also apparent from the fact that some of the translators complained that they could not follow their own judgment, being restrained by “reasons of state.” The result: the King James Version is not a true reflection of the minds of the translators of the version. Above all, it comes far short of being a faithful reflection of the mind of Jehovah God, as it appears in the original manuscripts.
@@FireShine-ss4sb It is a poetic shortened form of Jehovah, the name of the Most High God. (Ex 15:1, 2) This abbreviated form is represented by the first half of the Hebrew Tetragrammaton יהוה (YHWH), that is, the letters yohdh (י) and heʼ (ה), the tenth and fifth letters of the Hebrew alphabet respectively. Jah occurs 50 times in the Hebrew Scriptures, 26 times alone, and 24 times in the expression “Hallelujah,” which is, literally, a command to a number of people to “praise Jah.” However, the presence of “Jah” in the original is completely ignored by certain popular versions. (Dy, Mo, RS) The King James Version and An American Translation have it only once, as “Jah” and “Yah” respectively. (Ps 68:4) In the English Revised Version it appears twice in the body of the text (Ps 68:4; 89:8), and in the American Standard Version the full form, Jehovah, is substituted throughout, but these latter two translations in practically every occurrence of the contracted form call it to our attention in footnotes. The New World Translation preserves for the reader all 50 occurrences of Jah, or Yah; and Rotherham’s Emphasised Bible, 49 of them.
@@FireShine-ss4sb Do a bit more research. It was iesus before anything. Iesus H Christos. Never what you said. "Jews" is a made-up word by the Guyym (Gentiles) also. Descendants from the Royal Tribe of Yahudah (my Tribe) are called Yahudym, for the plural. Yahudy for a singular male, and Yahudyth for a singular female. Jah/Yah points to the actual Name of the Creator. YaHUaH. The word switched out for "god" was AL, in some cases, ALuah in others, or ALahym most times & even ALuahym at times. I implore you to dig deeper & pray for byna (understanding). Shalum alykam (Peace be upon you)
The 1st act Congress did was to hire a translator to print the 1st American Bible. That Bible is The Aitkens Bible based off The Geneva not King James. They are very similar but The Founders hated King James and The Monarchy which was burning Geneva’s in the days of the Colonies. The Aitkens September 12th 1782 is known as The Revolutionary War Bible.The only thing is,Aitkens took the Apocrypha out which should be in there. The Geneva was present at the signing of the Deceleration of Independence and Constitution . King James thought he and his bloodline were to reign over man. He killed so many Christians that didn’t believe his way. He was a mass murderer. As far as the People escaping England for Religious freedom....They had no Love for King James. There were no printing presses like we have today. All hand written. They had King James Versions for referring to ,to show differences.
@@sergioortiz1839 Order a Geneva online. Aitkens would be nice too. A 1599 Geneva is small print but has a lot of material George Washington wrote in there. Has a lot of laws passed down from England we kept. It does not have the apocrypha in it. A 1556 Geneva in Old English does. It’s a little harder to read but you should catch on how some of the letters were used differently
@@sergioortiz1839 That is the copy of the original and in Chauncers English with The Apocrypha. I have both. The Patriots edition. It’s small lettering in the Patriots which is 1599. Go with the original because it has the Marginal notes all the translators wrote in there. Queen Mary Tudor married King Philips of Spain and was bringing Catholicism back by beheading if you didn’t convert. Sound like another Religion to you? The translators were hunted by the King and Queen and that’s where a few wrote they Bible was in Geneva. John Calvin hated living there due to the men were allowed to have mistresses by law. Very immoral place back then. The Geneva was written for the plough boy. Referring to the common folk. Poor. Like most of us now. Because no one was allowed to read or write or recite the Bible in anything but Latin back then or you would get your tongue cut out. English was known as the Vulgar tongue then. If you read about the Marian exiles you will understand why this Bible was written. Don’t get the 2 lines of Bible mixed up. The Latin Vulgate was the Catholic Bible and Martin Luther and Geneva are the same just different languages derived from the Greek and Hebrew. They based it off The Subtuagint if I’m not mistaken, The New Testament that is. The drink Bloody Mary got its name from her. She was responsible for murdering close to 300 translators of the Geneva Bible. They wanted all men to know what God had said for them not a King or Church that kept you under rule by keeping you ignorant.
@@vanseventy I currently have the NKJV and a ESV version. Both were handed down to me by coworkers. I had a feeling there was more to it with all this confusion. My family is catholic and pray to the Virgin Mary. Ever since I became Christian my life has been improving in all areas. I am having a hard time finding the 1556 Geneva Bible. Do you know which sites I could use to purchase one?
@@code5829 not the Great Bible, as it was commissioned by the Church of England. I mean the best way to go would be to get the textus receptus and translate it to english yourself i suppose. Holy Roman Empire is under the Antichrist, per 1560 Geneva Bible.
Roman type print? Roman Greek interpretation is the problem as they underwrote European into scripture that was stolen from the true people. Chinese are doing it now saying we can do the same
Now I'm super curious. Moses was a murderer to though lol. I've only known KJV so I been doing research. Just want the closest thing since I can't read Hebrew, Aramaic, nor Greek. 😔 Other day Catholics told me KJV is bad cause he took some books out. I gotta find where and how to figure this stuff out
@@jojomafia3851 Who did Moses murder ? If he did: did he repent ? After he repented, what were his fruits ? 'Curiosity killed the cat' so, do not be 'curious': be Biblical. "Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them."Jésus-Christ i.e. God i.e. Adonaï{Authorized Holy King James 1611}
@@jojomafia3851 Who did Moses murder ? If he did: did he repent ? After he repented, what were his fruits ? 'Curiosity killed the cat' so, do not be 'curious': be Biblical. "Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them."Jésus-Christ i.e. God i.e. Adonaï{Authorized Holy King James 1611}
Disobedience to tyrants is obedience to God is a very accurate phrase!!
Tyrants are tyrants.
Tyrants are not kings.
Not all kings are tyrants, but some kings acts tyrannical.
Considering satanic members exist within politics, and they've hijacked nearly all governments in the west, I'd say this is accurate...
The Bible doesn’t seem to make nuance between following authority. All authority has been put in place by God.
Unless they're telling us to disobey God we should our best to not break the law. However God's law is supreme.
@@joshportie❌ The laws tells you, ‘protects’ you, relatively ‘rewards’ and pays you daily in disorder to break & disobey GOD’s Laws.
🚫You guys care, fear and obey laws SIGNIFICANTLY MORE, if not totally, than you ever obey GOD’s Laws.
GOD’s Laws is NOT ‘supreme’: it is the one and only laws, incomparably and immutably.
GOD’s Laws is ABSOLUTE.
🛎️I will never be a ‘law abiding citizen’ because I am a Born-Again Bible-Obeying Christian belonging to The Kingdom of Jesus ChrisT i.e. GOD:
🎯I am “in this world” but I am not “of this world”.
This video was a most excellent addition to my daily regime of self-directed continuing education. Thank you!
Glad it was helpful!
God is the same tomorrow today and yesterday
@godislord3377
(Psalm 112:1)
World English Bible
[Praise Yah! Blessed is the man who fears Yahweh, who delights greatly in his commandments.]
Young's Literal Translation
[Praise ye Jah! O the happiness of one fearing Jehovah, In His commands he hath delighted greatly.]
The One True Almighty God, Jah the
Father- Yahweh (English-Jehovah)
The Almighty God of the 66 inspired canonical books of God's Word the Holy Scriptures.
-Isaiah 45:5- WEB
[I am Yahweh, and there is (no one else.) Besides me, there is (no God). I will strengthen you, though you have not known me,]
[YHWH ] 4 consonants form of the divine name occurring nearly 7000 in Bible ....
Reference
King David 1100 times
Yeshua/Jesus around 330 times.
The 66 canonical books of God's inspired word the Holy Scriptures.
which biblical scholars to say it means
"he causes become",
"he becomes anything"
"i am anything" -
necessary to achieve his will or purpose.. Which indicates His Godly wisdom, power to move events toward his divine will.
YHWH, YAH, JAH, YAHWEH, YAHOVAH. [Jehovah- English]
Hebrew/ Aramaic words have meaning.
Found in hebrew theo-phoric names-
Elijah, Adonijah, Yeho-shua, King Yəhōšafat and Prophet Isiah-Yəšaʿyāhū
- King Yəhōšafat
("Yahweh has judged")
Elijah's name means
“Yahweh is my God”
John-Jehonathan or Yehōnātān means
(Yahweh has given)
Jesus name in Hebrew/ Aramaic-
Yeshua (Salvation)
Yeho-shua ["Joshua"- English]
meaning -(Yahweh is Salvation)
Jesus name brings glory to the
One true Almighty God.
( Exodus 6:3) (Psalm 83:18 )
biblehub.com/psalms/83-18.htm
Sha'lom Aleichem in Christ
Hallelujah- Praise Almighty Jah you people.
Exodus 31:12-18
@dennisbrandt8517
The Messianic law is fulfilled in
Yeshua Hamashiach
(Ps 118:22)
[The stone that the builders rejected Has become the chief cornerstone. ]
Love the truth.
Sha'lom Aleichem in Christ
Hallelujah-Praise Almighty Jah, you people.
@GolfnMoreclips "if you love Me then obey My commandments " is pretty clear. No one would obey to be saved but rather because we're saved by His sweet merciful Grace. The law is eternal as He is.
Thank you for this.. I have been doing my own studies in the scriptures and the different bibles that are translations and I am very interested in The Geneva Bible, that is how I found your video. Thank you very much.
Sappi che ogni Bibbia📖 è una copia su un miliardo di copie!!!
King James didn't like the way the Bible called Kings Tyrants . The Geneva bible
Because in the KJV it says to obey your master, and that is likely a wrong translation. I always suspected that someone like the Free Masons got a hold of things and did a few adjustments. I think 1560 Geneva would be my choice. After all, a king doesnt want to lose his seat.
@@philindeblanc amen brother
@@philindeblanc Absolutely untrue and heretical.
If you want to deceive yourself, go ahead, but do not deceive others.
@@njiomonansichristianfreder6374 what is untrue?
@@philindeblanc It is untrue, and heretical, that Holy King James didn't like the way THE BIBLE calls Kings tyrants.
There are whole books in THE BIBLE for Kings, Jésus-Christ i.e. God HIMSELF either appointed, or favoured Kings. Holy David was a King, Holy Solomon was a King, Saul was a King, and Esther was a Queen, to list a few.
Jesus ChrisT is "The King of Kings", and "The Lord of Lords" .
Do not be deceived: sola scriptura.
"All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:"Jésus-Christ i.e. God i.e. Adonaï{Authorized Holy King James 1611}
I do the side by side for each scripture from every Bible I can get my hands on.
And you still prefer the kjv huh it's the best
Have you used the Tree of Life Messianic Jewish Bible? I am getting one asap.
@@marystout1606i use the TLV along with the ESV and NASB and occasionally KJV. the TLV is a really good bible.
Guys, here is The True Savior
HalleluYAH translates “Praise ye YaH”
YaH is The Heavenly Father
YaH arrives via the TENT OF MEETING
YaH was Who they Crucified for our sins
YaH was Crucified on an Almond TREE
- Ancient Semitic Cuneiform of Moshe (Moses)
- Isa Scroll (The Original Isaiah)
Isaiah 42:8
"I am YaH; that is my Name! I will not yield my glory to another or my praise to idols.
Isaiah 43:11
I, I am YAH, and there is no other Savior but Me.
Isaiah 45:5
I am YaH, and there is none else.
@@yeshuaislord3058 you are MAJORLY deceived. You think Yeshua is JESUS? SMH.
Very interesting video. Takes me back to Theology class when I was an undergrad......1984!!! Great post, thank you.
When I was a young man in the 1950’s south. The Geneva Bible was commonly used.
Interesting fact
I lived in the South in 1950s & never saw or knew about any Geneva Bible. We read the KJV in public school -- Bible reading was state law for public schools.
I just subscribed...I used to live in Moultrie...I live in Oregon now as the tech director for my church. I love this, and find this stuff fascinating. Great video!!!
We don't need translations we need the original one as well where is it and stop promoting someone thing you don't have a full information about
@@mlungisimasinda7117 you are DECEIVED.
@@DiscernmentNow by whom? The first Bible not the Greeks or European version
What a difference even just "should" being taken out for the meaning. I've always been taught "Ye though I WALK.." as if we are doing it rather it before said "Ye though I SHOULD walk" as more of and 'if' or 'when you do'. Because one seems to refer to constantly being in the shadow of death and one seems to refer to it not being a constant thing.
Same meaning different English
Hi Pastor. More Christians Should Read The Geneva Bible.
I switched to the Geneva.
Love this video really gives you a good appreciation for this era of bible translations
Glad you enjoyed it!
I find the Geneva Bible very exciting! It's a piece of history, and I find it fascinating to observe how the old English was spelled in that version as well as the Tyndale version. I'm also curious how much England still uses some of what we call old spellings and how much of it is even an old spelling for them?
They do in some instances. Musick if I remember is one example.
I heard that people in the UK Or in the British Colones (used to be) stil use enlightened... the Canada National Anthem still has the thee's. we still sing hymns with the old english :) saith and says sound the same if you read it :)
I found 2 versions of the Geneva Bible in Apple’s App Store. A bit difficult to read but well worth the effort. Thanks for your video.
I would like a 1560 Geneva bible. Thank you for this video. Many blessings to you.
e-sword has the Geneva 1587 . are they much different?
I just purchased a copy from EBay. Worth every penny!!
@@TheSisUNeedgift me one ?🙂
Stick with your KJV it has no errors like the geneva does!
Yu Sure, awesome bible, GNV.
...
I grew up on the 1984 NWT ... Then read the 1984 NIV Zondervan ... Now I use the Doubleday ... But my Grandparents were once Mormon .. Then became Jehovah Witnesses .. I left the JW In 2013 ... And have a Cambridge ... I am here to learn ...
Praise the Lord!
praise the Lord! its a blessing to see you came out of those cults and to a saving faith in Christ Jesus
Guys, here is The True Savior
HalleluYAH translates “Praise ye YaH”
YaH is The Heavenly Father
YaH arrives via the TENT OF MEETING
YaH was Who they Crucified for our sins
YaH was Crucified on an Almond TREE
- Ancient Semitic Cuneiform of Moshe (Moses)
- Isa Scroll (The Original Isaiah)
Isaiah 42:8
"I am YaH; that is my Name! I will not yield my glory to another or my praise to idols.
Isaiah 43:11
I, I am YAH, and there is no other Savior but Me.
Isaiah 45:5
I am YaH, and there is none else.
I too was raised JW from 3 yrs old and left at 16 and believed just couldn’t do it and thought God was mean. Now I know better and found Jesus Christ and the truth definitely set me free. I have both king James 1611 and Geneva Bible, at one time I had every Bible I could get to compare scripture with scripture, when I was learning my faith was an occult and wrong, n now I got rid of them all except the KJB 1611 and Geneva.
Anyway glad you not a JW anymore also. God bless
I have the Scotfeild KJB 1611
Amend your ways being more accurate simply requires one to understand that, according to the Bible, salvation is three-fold:
1. Jesus saves us
2. Preachers save us
3. We save ourselves
All through the process of "repentance" which most believers think means feeling bad and asking forgiveness. It means changing your mind about something. Repenting of sin means changing one's mind about the desirability of being ruled by sin, or forsaking that terrible task master for the blessing of being a slave of Christ! :o)
So far, so good! I'm loving it, and looking forward to getting the Geneva Bible as soon as possible.
True repentance can be found in 2 Cor. 7.
You are right on about what repentance, or metanoia (to change one’s mind) means.
The repentance that Jesus commanded is simply changing what you believe. Whatever you trust in now, stop trusting in that and trust in me. Matthew 21:31-32 implies that repentance leads to belief. Hebrews 6:1 says that repentance from dead works is a foundational doctrine of the faith, so it’s safe to say that this is the same repentance Jesus commanded. Jesus commanded the Jews, who trusted in their works of the law, to stop trusting in those dead works, and trust in Him. Repentance of sin for salvation is not required, because that would be works of the law (You turn from lying by obeying the law, you turn from fornication by obeying the law), and we know that we are not saved by our works of the law. God bless brother.
@@thegoodgift Repentance from sin is absolutely, essentially, and foundationally essential to salvation. To repent because the law says so, and you want to earn God's favor, is doing a work of the law. To repent because Jesus Christ commanded it is not a work of the law.
Christians are to obey the commandments of Jesus Christ, even when they parallel the commands of the law. Jesus says to love God with all your heart. Is that a work of the law? God forbid!
We are not saved by our works, and we cannot be saved without them.
@@busker153 How to be saved and have eternal life:
1. Realize that you, like everybody else, is a wicked sinner. (1 John 1:8) "If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us."
2. The penalty for sin is death. (Romans 6:23) "For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord."
3. Everybody's flesh will die, but our soul has to pay for our sins too. Because of this we all deserve to go to hell, and on the day of judgement, hell will be tossed into the eternal lake of fire. This is the second death. (Revelation 20:14) "And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death."
4. But God loves us so much, that he doesn't want us to go through this, He wants us to live with Him for eternity. So He sent Jesus Christ, the perfect image of God, to save us. (John 3:16) "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life."
5. Jesus Christ lived a perfect life with no sin. Because of this, and the fact that He is God in the flesh, He was the perfect sacrifice to pay for the sins of the whole world; past, present, and future. When He died on the cross, this is exactly what He did. After He died He was buried, and on the third day He rose again, proving that He was the messiah. This is THE GOSPEL. (1 Corinthians 15:1-4)
6. This is God's free gift to us. The gift of eternal life, and of escape from hell and the second death. All we have to do to receive this gift is BELIEVE THE GOSPEL. We DO NOT get into heaven by our own merit. The only thing that justifies us before God is our faith in the finished work of Jesus Christ. (Ephesians 2:8-9) "For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: not of works, lest any man should boast."
7. Jesus promises that whosoever believes on Him will never come into condemnation. This means that once you believe the gospel, you are forever secured in Him. There is nothing you can do to lose your salvation. (John 5:24) "Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life."
This is how to get saved according to the bible. Works (i.e. turning from sin, good deeds, etc.) DO NOT play a part in your salvation. Our righteousness is as filthy rags to the Lord (Isaiah 64:6), so we have to depend on the righteousness of Jesus. His righteousness is the only righteousness that pleases God. This is His free gift to us all why not just accept it right now by faith? What do you have to lose? This life is temporary but there are eternal consequences at stake. God bless you.
A very interesting difference I found in the 1599 Geneva Bible (first printed in 2006 by Tolle Legge Press, with modern lettering and spelling) is that where Jesus said to call no man rabbi, He said to call no man doctor.
i would stick to 1560 Geneva. I do feel over time even Geneva was corrupted with later revisions, in particular the marginal notes.
it's the mandela effect, happening to all bible versions.
@@Lexie810-b5r No, it's not. If the Mandela effect has any truth in it (which I doubt), it would NOT be able to change God's Word unless HE wanted to change it -- and He has stated that His Word does NOT change. However I looked again and saw that I had not read it correctly. What He said was,
Matthew 23 (1599 Geneva):
8 But be not ye called, Rabbi: for one is your doctor, to wit, Christ, and all ye are brethren.
9 And call no man your father upon the earth: for there is but one, your father which is in heaven.
10 Be not called doctors: for one is your doctor, even Christ.
11 But he that is greatest among you, let him be your servant.
I find it interesting that actually Jesus said basically, "Don't YOU have others call you Rabbi, or doctor or father. The "father" one to me is tricky, since He obviously didn't mean we should not call our biological father our father -- but look what the "Catholic church" did: they have people call ALL of their many thousands of priests "Father this" and "Father that" and "the Father." DIRECT DISOBEDIENCE TO CHRIST all day long. Just that one thing alone should be enough for people to realize they must get OUT of that apostate institution, but there are many other reasons that don't take a whole lot of effort to learn once you ALLOW yourself to look at that institution critically.
@@WholeBibleBelieverWoman amen brother. Is this information not in the 1560?
@@Lexie810-b5r No. It is misunderstandings. Those who want to deceive the whole world have subtly and slowly caused it to SEEM that way. Look into the history and you will find it NEVER said the lion will lay with the lamb, BUT and artist (using "artistic license" drew it that way and it became a famous painting) plus someone wrote a hymn for churches saying the same thing. Both the artist and the hymn writer may easily have been like so many today who DO NOT READ their Bibles but just believe what people TELL them is in the Bible. Lions and lambs are BOTH mentioned in that same paragraph or chapter, just never as "lion and the lamb" (and if it is, it is a bad translation).
I have a parallel Bible....it has 4 versions in it. Kjv, Rsv, the living bible, and the modern language Bible. Guidepost 1973. Love the kjv for the poetic flow. Helps to read the others sometimes.
I have a newer version of the Geneva bible, so it is easy to read. I haven't read through it in it's entirety yet, but so far it seems good.
1599 geneva is tainted. they removed key commentary in it. stick with 1560. for instance rev 20:8 removes who gog and magog were according to the authors of 1560. it was the turks, saracens and other enemies of the true church. there are many more instances
Bad. Revelation 13 16 in the new geneva replaces IN the right hand to ON the right hand. IN SPECIFICALLY MEANS SOMETHING INSIDE YOUR HAND UNDER THE SKIN! On could be a tattoo or something.
Why does the Geneva Bible use the word it in place of God, John 1:3, and that Word in 1:1?
@@cheese9812 zwow, I'm learning so much just from reading these comments as well as from the video itself. This is amazing!
What is 666 in Greek numerals? It’s certainly not 666 that’s for sure…. It looks something like XES….
Fun FACT : the 1611 kjv and the Geneva bible have scriptural references to the apocrypha. Like Jesus referencing Matthew 24:37, Hebrew 1135 references to the people tortured and waiting for a better resurrection.
I can read the Geneva yet the 1611 KJV still is hard for me to read. Even told that I'm not saved because of it. Called the Son of the devil. Yes I know that I'm saved.
Research King James.....He was a Free Mason and a Friend to the Catholic Church.....
"I always wondered why my mom licked her fingers. Now I know." That literally cracked me up! A true blast from the past. I remember seeing people do that, and wondered the same thing. LOL
Same..My mom had them thumb condoms all the time, she used to work at a bank hehe
I just recently bought both of these so I’m glad you’re comparing them.
@apple juice
Could you please tell me or link where you bought them please
Thank you
God bless you
@@walt307 So how does the 1599 Geneva compare to the earlier 1560 version?
Where and how much ,please
God is the genuine and sole author of this Book we call the Bible. Because only one who knows the end from the beginning could have foretold those things that came to pass, exactly as the prophets had predicted.
They interchanged i and j depending on how the word was used in the sentence. The j sound always existed in Old English. It was around the 14th Century, and I can't remember the guy's name who put a little hook on the i to stipulate he wanted the j sound, and that stuck. People began to do the same. The Holy Ghost is not a separate person. (Mark 12:29-31). If you see Jesus; you see God. John 14:6-7; John 1:1-5; John 4:24; John 5;43; John 8:23; John 8:58; Matt. 28:18-20; Col. 1:15-20; Rev.1: 8,18, Rev. 22 AKJVNT
But Christ did say he would send us the Holy Spirit to be a comforter to us. So how can they be the same? The trinity teaching is a gentile teaching that was not reckognized by the Apostles and the early church. It came through the Greco Roman teachings much later, nearly a century a.d.
Also, Christ was black. That’s why the Bible says the apostles (Peter, John, and James) were first called “niger” at Antioch. Niger means black, and that’s where we get the “N” word today. So if Christ’s disciples were black men, what color was Christ? Black.
I hope this helps you Sir. God Speed
@@Staystrong4Life1111 You probably need to re-read that Scripture reference. There's Only One God = Jesus. And No, the Apostles never recognized a trinity teaching. Oh, and John 1:1-5; John 4:24; John 14:6-7; Rev. 1:8,18. Acts 2:38 saves. AKJVNT I hope this helps you, Sir. 😄
“niger” at Antioch.....scripture please?......they were first called "christians" at Antioch.@@Staystrong4Life1111
I love this! GOD Bless you for making this
@DianeOfori
The One True Almighty God, Jah the
Father- Yahweh (English-Jehovah)
The Almighty God of the 66 inspired canonical books of God's Word the Holy Scriptures.
-Isaiah 45:5- WEB
[I am Yahweh, and there is (no one else.) Besides me, there is (no God). I will strengthen you, though you have not known me,]
[YHWH ] 4 consonants form of the divine name occurring nearly 7000 in Bible ....
Reference
King David 1100 times
Yeshua/Jesus around 330 times.
The 66 canonical books of God's inspired word the Holy Scriptures.
which biblical scholars to say it means
"he causes become",
"he becomes anything"
"i am anything" -
necessary to achieve his will or purpose.. Which indicates His Godly wisdom, power to move events toward his divine will.
YHWH, YAH, JAH, YAHWEH, YAHOVAH. [Jehovah- English]
Hebrew/ Aramaic words have meaning.
Found in hebrew theo-phoric names-
Elijah, Adonijah, Yeho-shua, King Yəhōšafat and Prophet Isiah-Yəšaʿyāhū
- King Yəhōšafat
("Yahweh has judged")
Elijah's name means
“Yahweh is my God”
John-Jehonathan or Yehōnātān means
(Yahweh has given)
Jesus name in Hebrew/ Aramaic-
Yeshua (Salvation)
Yeho-shua ["Joshua"- English]
meaning -(Yahweh is Salvation)
Jesus name brings glory to the
One true Almighty God.
( Exodus 6:3) (Psalm 83:18 )
biblehub.com/psalms/83-18.htm
Sha'lom Aleichem in Christ
Hallelujah- Praise Almighty Jah you people.
I just bought the Geneva 1560 Bible. I was surprised how large it is! Appreciate your video on this subject. Love my KJV always. Just curious how it compares with the Geneva Bible.
The 1500 Mathew version is the best in my opinion. Because it's the most hated version there is. You can't even find it's translation when merely googling it. Because it says flat earth in it in Samuel 2nd. I have a vid on it myself. ❤ The flat earth literally opened my eyes to Gods existence. He showed me his creations in way's I can't deny his intelligent design. The pure symmetries of everything. How molecules & even scaling up to whole designs like a human. Pure symmetry through & through. Perfect shapes & even mathematics to reference the side's of all things. Example like how everything just about has 2 eyes. 2 hands. 2 Feet. & Even beyond that the star constellations the way they're set like a clock in the skies never changing even from ancient cultures till modern day. Psalms 19.1 the heavens declare the glory of God & the firmament showeth his handiwork. Frequencies creating the same geometries as molecule collections with breathtaking Precision. As though God Spoke everything into existence with Frequencies. The subject on Symmetries of creation can no doubt be proof of a creator. God almighty does indeed exist. & The way all laws of physics & frequency & vibration & electromagnetism work in unison like a machine suggests the world is a complex computer a mechanism made up of different elements come together to create a machine set with specific Boundaries & rules to it's design. As though this could really be a simulation. But not in the sense that everyone & everything is a digital rendering. It's far more complex then that. Every electron & atom & molecule work's perfectly in unison together almost as though they're Sentient & intelligent & come together to create silicon based life forms & beyond. I'm not saying we live in the matrix but I'm not saying we're not in it either. God's designs can't be summed up in a context made by men. Not myself nor any scholar. Job 38:4-11 King James Version (KJV) - Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? Declare, if thou hast understanding. I feel absolutely Humbled by his handiwork. God's unfathomably awesome. Can't people see the forest for the trees anymore. Are so many so lost they can't see when God created this world it was Good. It was corrupted by the fallen & their children whom are still in charge of the world today. As in the day's of Noah So shall it be again. The world can't be fixed by apathetic behavior. Every individual must account for his or her own situation in life. For any scenario imaginable. A solution must be drawn. Where would human advancement be without investigation & discovery through hard diligent passion for their trade. God's grace & mercy are boundless. For the wickedness this world has seen & continues to see while seeking knowledge can't be measured. All lifeforms are energy. Energy can't be destroyed it can only transform. Is not the spirit the same. It being like an energy changes from clinging to it's flesh to ascension or descension. These words are the conclusion to over a decade of consistent research into well pretty much everything. Namely the truth & what aligns itself with biblical scriptures. This subject can not be articulated precisely. God's creation is beyond any mortal mind's comprehension.
KJV is 7th ♥️ Translated into English.
Psalms 12 kJV
6 The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
7 Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.
KJV is perfect ♥️
Hebrews 5 KJV
9 And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him;
Yes, even after having been allowed to SEE the events taking form and the movement of life shaping our time-line, I still can't comprehend it all.
Absolutely the most amazing journey ❤️
Where's your video
I don't believe that God Almighty, of the WHOLE Universe, would allow HIS words to be hidden. That is conjecture.
Romans 9:5(Geneva bible)Of whom are the fathers, and of whom concerning the flesh, Christ came, who is God over all, blessed forever, Amen.
Rom 9:5 KJV Whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen.
Amen !
The Sovereign Lord of the universe is not anonymous. He has identified himself some 7,000 times in the Bible as Jehovah. He attributes vital importance to his name. The third of the Ten Commandments states: “You must not take up the name of Jehovah your God in a worthless way, for Jehovah will not leave the one unpunished who takes up his name in a worthless way.” And Jesus highlighted his Father’s name in the Lord’s Prayer, saying, “Let your name be sanctified.”-Exodus 20:7; Matthew 6:9.
Christendom’s record in honoring God’s name is dismal. Even the King James Bible of 1611 uses the name Jehovah, alone and in combination, only seven times. Other translations have totally eliminated the name. Most religions fail to honor it. Instead, they have elevated their “holy” Trinity and, in some cases, Mary the so-called Mother of God above the God of the Bible. Jehovah’s precious name has been allowed to sink into relative disuse. The King James Bible has already been changed; today no one reads the King James Version in its original form. Explaining why this is so the book The Bible in Its Ancient and English Versions says: “Almost every edition, from the very beginning, introduced corrections and unauthorized changes and additions, often adding new errors in the process. The edition of 1613 shows over three hundred differences from 1611. . . . It was in the eighteenth century, however, that the main changes were made. . . . The marginal references were checked and verified, over 30,000 new marginal references were added, the chapter summaries and running headnotes were thoroughly revised, the punctuation was altered and made uniform in accordance with modern practice, textual errors were removed, the use of capitals was considerably modified and reduced, and a thorough revision made in the form of certain kinds of words.”
So many changes have been made, many of them in the readings of passages, that the Committee on Versions (1851-56) of the American Bible Society found 24,000 variations in six different editions of the King James Version!
What, then, of the objections raised by persons who say they do not want the King James Bible changed? Since the King James Version has already been changed, they lie on a crumbled foundation. If these persons do not want it changed, then why do they use, instead of a copy of an edition of 1611, an edition that has been changed? They use a present-day edition of the King James Bible because it is far easier to read. They appreciate, perhaps unknowingly, the improvements the later editions have made. They do not like the odd spelling and punctuation of the 1611 edition; they do not want to read “fet” for “fetched,” “sith” for “since” or “moe” for “more,” as the edition of 1611 had it. Thus improvement, when needed, is appreciated, even by those who say they object to any changing of the King James translation. No, God himself authorizes his dedicated servants to translate his Word into understandable language. The fact that King James authorized a Bible translation does not make it the exclusive version that the Author of the original Bible approves his servants to use in any one language. In fact, kingly authorization, instead of great benefits, has brought serious disadvantages.
King James set forth certain rules of procedure. These the translators followed. One of those rules was that “the old Ecclesiastical words [were] to be kept.” Thus the translators were bound to follow the Bishop’s Bible in using certain ecclesiastical words, whether or not these words represented an accurate translation of the original Bible. For example, the ecclesiastical word “bishop” appears in the King James Version, although the original word, correctly translated, merely means “overseer.”
In many respects the beliefs of King James adversely affected the Bible translation called after his name. The translators, feeling somewhat bound to favor the king, were obliged to color the translation with the king’s notions of predestination and kingly rights, as well as with others of the king’s ideas.
It is also apparent from the fact that some of the translators complained that they could not follow their own judgment, being restrained by “reasons of state.” The result: the King James Version is not a true reflection of the minds of the translators of the version. Above all, it comes far short of being a faithful reflection of the mind of Jehovah God, as it appears in the original manuscripts.
Those are some real serious Bibles you got there. I'm pretty envious 👍👍👍
I didn't quite get the point of the review entirely. The video title certainly towed me in and I had to have a look at the comments so I did watch the whole thing. Got a couple of videos of similar subject you and others might enjoy having a look at here on TH-cam both I found fascinating. The 1st one is an old video with Walter Veith titled "Why So Many Bible Versions? The UNTOLD Dark History of Bible Translations | Battle of the Bibles" it's on the Amazing Discoveries channel and the other is "The 1611th Mention of LORD (And Why It's a Really Big Deal)" channel Truth is Christ.
In my opinion kingdoms changed it due to the ephesians scripture,He removed the part about the kings and rulers of this world..and changed it to, We wrestle not against flesh and blood but against spiritual darkness in high places.i know im not exact but I hope 2 see that comparison in this video.
I have both bibles and the same context is there. Yes there is one word missing, well not missing but a different word put in, which means the same thing. I went thru scripture with scripture and the KJB1611 is accurate and even states they used the Geneva Bible but made it easier for people to read. I had every translation and I kept both the kjb1611 and the Geneva. Geneva is very hard to read so I do primarily use the KJB 1611 the newer Kjb and NKJB bibles are definitely messed with and context is changed.
@@lisaromano9086 The geneva Bible has more than 1 word change, it took out worldly Governors line in KJV that is a fact. Anyone can look it up and clearly see its different. The original verses weren't talking about other worldly beings it was talking about Govs and rulers of this world working for the dark
Sharing our Faith with others. Our God is a loving God #shareyourfaith #livingfaith
I have a 1611 edition KJV Bible. It's a fascinating piece of history and reading God's word through the lense of Christians from that time has a powerful punch to it.
Amen!
ya boi king james was a flamer and a catholic, NOT a christian. he was giving all his butt buddies their own kingdoms (like george buckingham, u ever heard of buckingham palace?? alot of ungodly things happened there)
the only reason he had the bible made for the english folk was to get them off his azz bc they knew he was corrupt. He also took much of the bible out.
I WOULDNT BE TALKIN TO HIGHLY OF KING JAMES, HE WAS OPPOSITE OF A CHRISTIAN, OH WELL I AINT CASTIN STONES , JUST CALLIN IT LIKE IT IS
Very helpful, thank you. Seems to me to be very similar to. The main issue with the Geneva Bible seems to be the commentary
The Geneva Bible was influnced by John Calvin.
Notes were placed in the Geneva Bible.
Predestination,unconditional election,total depravity, etc. go back to Augustine, who influnced Whycliff and Calvin.
Calvin had fifty five people burned at the stake in Geneva.
For disagreement of his doctrine.
So true!
More info on this? Are you saying we can't trust the Geneva either? I know King James was a freemason. Which Bible is most trustoworthy?
@@FisherKot They’re both excellent translations, I would just say the KJV is better translated. It had far more time and translators involved with it for instance.
Is KJV 1611 better then KJV 1900? @NewLifeOfAlbanyGa
@@gpais No
Thank you for sharing much appreciated
And earned a new subscription from Yorkshire England
Amen!
Two legendary Swords, really cool
Good teaching & delivery. Thank you
Glad it was helpful!
I like the way you say people just don't understand English. It was not harsh or accusatory; simply factual, and presented as a natural part of the explaination. Very skillful presentation of a harsh fact with gentle speech; most impressive.
The use of capital letters for things like the word Name are clearly interpretive, as the original Greek and Hebrew texts did not have any lowercase letters. A little known fact that cracks me up, to be honest. So, I never get hung up on caps verses lowercase.
I have decided to read the Geneva Bible next, but am not sure which version to buy. Should I get a 1560 because it is the best (I do not know if it is or not at this point), or the 1599 for the same potential reason? If readability of language and type font are not an issue (I love the language of the KJV -- or is it the K I V ? Couldn't resist!), would you have an opinion as to which one I should buy first?
I like the1560.
@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa I have a feeling I am going to like it, too! Thank you for your reply. I am probably going to get a 1599 first, but I do feel a desire to read that olde english.
I was following along with my new NIV, and was pleased to find that though the wording is much more modern (easier reading flow for me) it's still in alignment with the fundamental message. That's what truly matters.
I would like to have one of those old replicas though. The historical implication cannot be overstated. Christians gave a lot to bring the word of God to this land. I thank God for that!
HEY! The Niv is a wicked modern modern translation God can still reach you through it but it is not his perfect word. Hundreds of changes that take out the reverence of the blood of Jesus Christ. Keep reading the word happy new year! God made the universe he can delivers a truly perfect Bible. The world hates the kjv not because its difficult its not. Its perfect a true feat of God in this church age to flood the earth with his word !
@@briant1976 well that’s interesting considering the original writings of the Bible were in Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic. The King James was written in old English, and if you were paying attention to the video King James had parts of the Bible altered to fit his agenda. It’s hilarious that people watch movies about the Bible and think they all spoke like they’re straight out of Buckingham Palace. 😂
@@GD-tn3ez no thr original writings were scriptures there was no Bible. The holy Bible was created by God using men. To last the ages seems God knew that Greek and Hebrew were dead languages. Seems God knows everything. Hey not here to fight. The word is perfect the word was God! No updated needed
@@GD-tn3ez
The NIV comes from the Alexandrian Text (Codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus) and not from the Textus Receptus that the KJV used for transcription. Those scholars were well aware of the Codex Vaticanus and rejected it.
Many of the main modern Bible translations use the Greek New Testament from Westcott and Hort, in which these two hated the KJV and were involved in the occult. Also, coming from this product came the Nestle-Aland Greek New Testament, which has went through 28 revisions since its inception.
There may be many similarities between modern versions and the KJV but those subtle differences have increased over the years. The Alexandrian Texts have only been accepted by their age and only dated by their writings but the old scholars in the 1800s still rejected it by their errors and writings that did not fully match the era.
@@n9wff Cool...So anyway....every verse that I weigh against the Geneva Bible of 1599 (which obviously predates the KJV of 1611) has been in alignment.
God bless. 🙂
49yr old southern Baptist preachers LAST child.... Recently found God(49) and realized that MOST of the 'truths' I thought I knew as fact were NOT facts!
Jesus is the answer! The rest is noise or history. Still learning what the TRUTH actually is!
Financed by the English congregation at Geneva, the Bible was first printed in Geneva in 1560. Royal permission was obtained from Queen Elizabeth for its printing in England. In the eighty-four years of its publication, some 140 editions of the Geneva Bible or New Testament were produced.
140 editions in 84 years …
They needed to get it right hence the kjv …
Too many people hear stupid junk others say and run with it not even looking up the facts .. just going on heresay…. Idiots they are …
I love how the Geneva says Passover instead of Easter
Amen!
Is it in this case more accurate?
@@DropOfABucket No, I’ve done a video or 2 on that.
@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa Which video?
@@bobbyadkins6983 Hmm, how to find it. Maybe search KJV or king james and Geneva on the channel?
Leaning a lot. Thank you!
Thank you for sharing this information!
Glad it was helpful!
Explain if the scriptures say “no other name” how can one be saved or baptized in another translated name? Is the name the angels, his mother and the name the apostles baptized in to hard to say? I have a name I was given at birth. If you go to the bank or anywhere else that will only except my birth name and try to use a nickname they not going to except it?
Acts 2: 12Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other NAME under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.
Matt 1: 21And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call HIS NAME ( the angel called Him Yeshua: Yah is Salvation). JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.
Proverbs 30: 4Who hath ascended up into heaven, or descended? who hath gathered the wind in his fists? who hath bound the waters in a garment? who hath established all the ends of the earth? what is HIS NAME and what is HIS SON’S NAME, if thou canst tell?
Thank you! I truly appreciate this.
I have both.in the Geneva ( I have the Patriots edition) I don't read the comments on the verses.i want God's inspired verses only.id feal the same way if my King James had commentary.
Amen
I had the 1611 KJV produced by Hendrickson, bad production with words duplicated in text that are only supposed to be there once, all throughout that edition.
Do you know of the verse in the Geneva bible mentioning "governours", saying something to the effect of, they are not good?
I have a Geneva bible and had read that verse a while back and cannot find it again. Someone online mentioned this and I neglected to write it down or mark it in my Bible.
Thank you for any help!
Geneva Bible......Ephesians 6:12....🙏
@@robertrouser thank you so much!!
"Governnous" is not in Geneva Bible; it is gouernours (expect u used for the letter we call "v".
Eph. 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, and against the worldly gouernours, the princes of the darkenesse of this worlde, against spirituall wickednesses, which are in ye hie places.
ASV 1901: For our wrestling is not against flesh and blood, but against the principalities, against the powers, against the world-rulers of this darkness, against the spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.
Greek USB-4: ὅτι οὐκ ἔστιν ἡμῖν2 ἡ πάλη πρὸς αἷμα καὶ σάρκα, ἀλλὰ πρὸς τὰς ἀρχάς, πρὸς τὰς ἐξουσίας, πρὸς τοὺς κοσμοκράτορας τοῦ σκότους τούτου, πρὸς τὰ πνευματικὰ τῆς πονηρίας ἐν τοῖς ἐπουρανίοις.
Greek NA28, showing textual variations:
ὅτι οὐκ ἔστιν ⸀ἡμῖν ἡ πάλη πρὸς αἷμα καὶ σάρκα ἀλλὰ πρὸς τὰς ⸂ἀρχάς, πρὸς τὰς ἐξουσίας⸃, πρὸς τοὺς κοσμοκράτορας τοῦ σκότους ⸆ τούτου, πρὸς τὰ πνευματικὰ τῆς πονηρίας ⸋ἐν τοῖς ἐπουρανίοις⸌.
The Textual Variations shown in NA28:
• 12 ⸀ υμιν 𝔓46 B D✱ F G Ψ 81. 1175 it vgms syp; Lcf Ambst Spec ¦
txt ℵ A D2 I K L P 0278. 33. 104. 365. 630. 1241s. 1505. 1739. 1881. 2464 𝔐 ar g✱ vg syh co; Cl Or |
VARIATION BETWEEN "TO YOU" (YOUR) & "TO US" (OUR); YOUR WRESTLING & OUR WRESTLING
⸂ μεθοδιας 𝔓46 |
APPARENTLY 1 ANCIENT MANUSCRIPT HAS A DIFFERENT WORD FROM PALE ("wrestling")
⸆ του αιωνος ℵ2a D2 K L P Ψ 81. 104. 365. 630. 1241s. 1505. 1739mg. 1881. 2464 𝔐 syh✱✱; Tert ¦
txt 𝔓46 ℵ✱.2b A B D✱ F G 0278. 6. 33. 1175. 1739txt latt syp co; Cl Or Eus |
VARIATION APPARENTLY BETWEEN TOU AIONOS (OF THE AGE) & ITS OMISSION (OF THE DARKNESS THIS AGE vs
OF THIS DARKNESS).
⸋ 𝔓46; Did
1K 15,50! 1,21! 1,3! One ancient manuscript omits ἐν τοῖς ἐπουρανίοις (IN THE HEAVENLIES)
-
Christians people please read).
Jesus said; "If u love Me keep My Commandments", so read this; We have to obey God's Ten Commandments, and keep the Sabbath Day Holy, not Sunday (day) but Sabbath Day on Saturday it's on the Seventh Day of the week amen amen and amen ❤.
The Sabbath Day for the people of God, so if you not belong to God then you don't need to keep the Sabbath Day Holy).
Wait judgment Day and u will see what happen next. 😢 .....
....
.....
.....
.....
.....
If you were under the Sabbath you would be able to judge someone but you're not able to judge no one about the Sabbath. It's not a salvation issue you didn't rightly divided.
The end times prophecy in ISAIAH 66, shows you what God says about the Sabbath. Eye opener.....
This video is a reminder I’ve gone too deep
I am with you
If I was an alien and I found myself in a bookstore and I've never read any books before I believe I would pick up a Bible and take that book first. I imagine I would start reading and think... What is this stuff? I'm going to download the Geneva Bible. God bless you as well.
Both Bibles are from the same line of manuscripts, uncorrupted Antioch manuscripts. Different than the corrupted Alexandrian manuscripts most new bibles today come from.
Yes sir. Absolutely right!! FINALLY somebody who gets it!!!
If you wanna see what trash the NIV is, compare those 2 Bibles to the NIV!!!
I don't believe there is anything that isn't corrupted. Perhaps the manuscripts are better than the English translations, but it's very naive to think there's a perfect version as they've all been tampered with for whatever agendas.
@@stevethompson9615Love the brilliant NIV. Much stronger on the deity of Christ and the Holy Spirit than the KJV. No matter what blasphemous idolatrous trash the KJV only cult say
How are the Alexandrian manuscripts corrupted? How are the manuscripts from Antioch uncorrupted? Usual unsubstantiated accusations with no evidence. Alexandria where the deity of Christ and the doctrine of the trinity was defended. Antioch where the Arianism heresies were taught. That Jesus was a created being. Just had the Jehovah Witnesses teach. One of the traits of the KJV only cult is wilful ignorance and double standards.
@@henrylaurel1188 Angry?
We better not say anything bad about the King James Version lol
Thank You and GOD BLESS YOU
I love the Geneva as well, it’s so eloquent. The Geneva and KJV 1611 are my side-by-side Bibles.
Amen!
Thank you for your video im looking forward to getting a Geneva bible, I think of rev 22:18-19 when I think of changing words or removing things so I'd like to stay close to the orginal as possible. One fault I found is Jesus is certainly not his original name, it was Yeshua which means Savior in Hebrew. That would have been how everyone addressed him and the name he went by. Jesus is an English term so probably best not to infer that your audience doesn't understand English
His name means YAHWEH is salvation.
In Greek it was Iesous so Jesus is a English form if that. If you see the Greek its not that far. People get saved in Jesus name all the time.
My name is Sarah but if someone in spanish calls me Sada I understand they are still speaking to me.
Greek - Iēsous
Latin - Iesus
English - Jesus
Demons run when I call on Jesus name. I know his name is Yeshua in Hebrew and everyone spoke Hebrew before Nirmrod got everyone building the tower of Babel so no matter what when Father God had to confuse everyone's language as the were disobediant and trying to make war again heaven, Father God still created all the languages everywhere when He had to split mankind apart so they would spread out across the earth and be fruitful and multiply as He has had commanded in the begining. X
@@sarahs7253 yes and demons tremble at the Name of Jesus and ppl are delivered and set free Hallalujah
✟
For I will pour water upon him that is thirsty, and floods upon the dry ground: I will pour my spirit upon thy seed, and my blessing upon thine offspring:
Isaiah 44:3 (KJV)
Thanks for the video brother!
No problem 👍
I just started recently and i have quite different bibles. Can't afford the expensive one's yet.
@@katlegomohlala5545 started what?
The letter 'I' followed by a vowel makes the y sound
Where did you get this huge edition with gothic print? I have the roman print but I would like to read with the gothic print
Greatsite.
Wow, looked on the greatsite website, and didnt find one, what i found was $200000 1st edition bibles and not much else.... ooofa
I ordered from the kjv store ( dont know much about them )
I have the exact KJV 1611... With original leaf certificate.Brand new in box..Selling £200
Do both versions contain Exd 21 where it endorses slayvery?
Shakespeare was a fan of Tyndall.
My impression is that most modern men consider repentance to mean being sorry for doing something sinful. 2 Cor. 7 proves that this was wrong thinking that even existed when Paul was writing.
its funny, when we cry we enter a state in which our neurons can rewire. This is why we only cry once about things because our brain, while crying, rewires to adjust and accomodate whatever we were crying about.
Repentance actually means change of mind.
When we are sorry for our sins, so much that we cry unto our lord about having committed them, thats when we can say we truely repented, because even on a physical level we know that we changed our mind.
Ita amazing ❤
Have enjoyed your comparison, what version do y'all read,study,and preach out of???
KJV usually
Kjv, esv, rsv, nasb
@@bigtobacco1098 ESV, and almost all modern Bibles use the Gnostic gospels and texts of Alexandria Egypt. I'd stick with God's WORD, the Authorized KJB. Textus Receptus or RECEIVED TEXT. They were FIRST called CHRISTIANS at ANTIOCH, NOT ALEXANDRIA EGYPT, home of Gnosticism and Luciferianism.
Wonderful Comparison of The Holy Bible.
GENEVA all the Way
The Textus Receptus is the inspired word of God.
Excellent informative video!
Glad you enjoyed it!
Where do you get that kjv bible 1611? I haven't seen one that thick or Geneva bible
Greatsite
@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa Great site web page
I subbed because of 1John 5:7 knowledge comparisons. ❤
How can the Geneva be 50 yrs older and yet discredited? By which denominator do we grant the king James credibility over the older version?
It’s about other factors than age. I still love the Geneva though. It’s one of the best
@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa Thanks for responding. But wouldn't an older translation be more pure as time can distort text?
@@TheWatchman48 Not necessarily.
@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa Please help me, I'm looking for the oldest English translation possible.
This is the age the great book of Revelation spoke of where even GOD'S own elect would be decieved if not for HIS return. I'm just a lowly sinner so image my plight.
@@TheWatchman48 Google Wycliffe Bible
God bless
One point of significant difference is in Romans 3:23. (There is a slight difference in the verse division)
Geneva: For there is no difference: for all have sinned, and are deprived of the glory of God,
KJV: For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
It seems that there is a shift in the translation in the KJV with the various pre-KJV translation expressing some sort of barrier to the glory of God.
I dont see any difference in meaning. Can you please explain more?
Thank you, very interesting stuff. It would be nice to hear a little about Martin Luther in the 15th Century,,,i have come to the understanding that the Catholic Church was more cathartic to the deaf, dumb, and blind in things such as rosaries and statues. I learned that Martin Luther was about not putting faith in graven images, or paying tithes to them, as the church opened the doors as Simon selling tickets to heaven for 20 pieces of silver, and in that supplication came Simon Peter, with eyes to see, ears to hear, and a mouth to speak. Thank you King James,,,for right and left top English,,we now have brail ! - Praise be !!
Aw man if you have an interest in Martin Luther then you should also look into Jan Hus and the Hussite Wars. Basically laid the foundation for everthing Martin Luther accomplished.
Im thinking about getting the geneva bible is it good
Pretty good.
@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa which onevis better 1611 or geneva
@@alfredbaxter1061 sir have you figured this out?
Thank you sir.
@@code5829 I didn't get it yet I got the cepher bible
@@alfredbaxter1061 1560 Geneva bible🙏✝️
I love both BIBLE and I understand both 😊Apostle Dr Matthews
@apostledrshirleybmatthews6304 may I ask who that other person is in your thumbnail?
Kjv only all the way
I got a 1611 King James. It is hard to read but if you know your Bible, it is easier to follow.
I think John 3:36 has a very interesting difference. In the Geneva (1599 Tolle Lege) one MUST obey Jesus; in the KJV obedience is not even mentioned in this verse:
Geneva 1599: "He that believeth in the Son, hath everlasting life, and he that obeyeth not the Son, shall not see life, but the wrath of God abideth on him."
King James: He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.
(In my studies of scripture I have come to believe that the two most important things followers of Jesus must do are TRUST and OBEY him.)
Yes indeed. I looked up and compared these verses, and it is absolutely so written. I have a 1560 Geneva Bible and it is basically not hard to read. I am definitely not a KJV only believer. There seems to be a pattern, I've noticed the newer the translations, the more is changed, rewritten, or just removed entirely. Hmm?
@@kinnonmoss- Yes there was scripture removed entirely from the Bible. Some scriptures that were removed are brought back to us in the book of Mormon, it's part of the restoration. A lot of people really don't understand what that book is about. I know what the testimony of the two witnesses will be, rather soon too imo. If you or anyone cares to know, I've posted my first two videos explaining their testimony. I also explain the witness/prophet like Moses in greater detail as well. I do not however support the LDS church, with their false prophet and false doctrines surrounding the book of Mormon. God bless
I seen more context as I read the 1611 KJV and now reading the Geneva 1560 there is a heck of a lot more difference. I’m leaning towards Geneva.
@@TLast-bt8yh Good lean. (smile)
Compare it to the original bible from back in the 4th century and you will find you are missing books.
People spend their entire lives studying and nitpicking every verse, every word, in the Bible, and not really get the providential meanings that are in the Bible.
Sometimes. But sometimes it's a necessary thing to research, because deceivers are SUBTLE.
@@DiscernmentNow The Jews during Jesus time did the same thing. That's a reason they rejected the messiah because they didn't understand the providence at that time.
Excellent video Pastor. Very interesting.
Glad you enjoyed it!
I only read the Geneva Bible, it’s closer to GOD.
If that's is sooo important to you, then you should learn latin/greek and read right from the source.
Hebrew
Mareese. I live in France in Europe. I read the Jerusalem BIble. It's the first time that i heard about the geneva bible and the KIng james bible
I read the KJV and nothing else.
Amen. Me too
WHERE CAN I GET THESE BIBLES
Try eBay, unless Greatsite has reproduced them.
In john 1:3-4, the Geneva refers to God as " it " . That should shut the Geneva version down immediately if you have any trace of discernment.
It was Puritan John Reynolds who submitted the idea of the making of a better Translation to the King at the Hampton Conference in Jan of 1604.
Side by side and line upon line there is no comparison of the Geneva Bible (1569 or 1599) with the Authorized Version of 1611.
The “Translation” had to be made on THAT Island, not upon the continent in Switzerland.
Gen 10:5; Acts 16:11
No you're wrong, Yashua was pronounced just as it is written, not Jesus which nobody used in those days. Jesus is Greek and Yashua is Hebrew for Ya or YHWH saves. Just like Joshua.
I’m not sure you’ve seen the totality I’ve done on this subject. God bless!
@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa Taking the "Ya" out of his real name is like taking the Ya out of JeremiYA and ObidiYA, ZachariYA, etc etc. Jesus was not his name therefore it makes no difference if the "i" was pronounced as a "j" in this case (and the case you made). In this instance, it is immense that the J sound is not used as it was many many years later projected to do. Greek and Hebrew were phonetic languages with phonetic alphabets. One letter did not have to totally different sounds. It was later that the J sound was used . This is all intertwined with the word "Jew" which had nothing to do with Yehudah, it's nothing but deception and twist speak. Iudea was pronounced Yudea. Now all we have to do is distinguish Iudeans from Yehudah like Caiaphas and Herod for instance were Iudeans, but not Yahudim. Yes it goes right where you will never go.
I speak Hebrew. There is no "J" in that language. The letter J was the last letter added to the Aleph Bet (alphabet). His name was definitely Yashua (Joshua). Jesus in Latin means "earth pig". Everyone stops at the translation of Jesus on Greek which is Zeus, but its deeper than what YOU BELIEVE.
@richardm you are correct. Also Ps. 68-4 tells you the name of God is Yah
@@bajamanuela9705 Yeshua Hamashiach is another good one
Some words are different in king j says without fault and Geneva says without spot rev 14
You didn't understand truth. If it's translated from Hebrew...then go to the HEBREW! Jesus isn't a Hebrew name...
Then don’t comment in English. Comment in Hebrew.
The Sovereign Lord of the universe is not anonymous. He has identified himself some 7,000 times in the Bible as Jehovah. He attributes vital importance to his name. The third of the Ten Commandments states: “You must not take up the name of Jehovah your God in a worthless way, for Jehovah will not leave the one unpunished who takes up his name in a worthless way.” And Jesus highlighted his Father’s name in the Lord’s Prayer, saying, “Let your name be sanctified.”-Exodus 20:7; Matthew 6:9.
Christendom’s record in honoring God’s name is dismal. Even the King James Bible of 1611 uses the name Jehovah, alone and in combination, only seven times. Other translations have totally eliminated the name. Most religions fail to honor it. Instead, they have elevated their “holy” Trinity and, in some cases, Mary the so-called Mother of God above the God of the Bible. Jehovah’s precious name has been allowed to sink into relative disuse. The King James Bible has already been changed; today no one reads the King James Version in its original form. Explaining why this is so the book The Bible in Its Ancient and English Versions says: “Almost every edition, from the very beginning, introduced corrections and unauthorized changes and additions, often adding new errors in the process. The edition of 1613 shows over three hundred differences from 1611. . . . It was in the eighteenth century, however, that the main changes were made. . . . The marginal references were checked and verified, over 30,000 new marginal references were added, the chapter summaries and running headnotes were thoroughly revised, the punctuation was altered and made uniform in accordance with modern practice, textual errors were removed, the use of capitals was considerably modified and reduced, and a thorough revision made in the form of certain kinds of words.”
So many changes have been made, many of them in the readings of passages, that the Committee on Versions (1851-56) of the American Bible Society found 24,000 variations in six different editions of the King James Version!
What, then, of the objections raised by persons who say they do not want the King James Bible changed? Since the King James Version has already been changed, they lie on a crumbled foundation. If these persons do not want it changed, then why do they use, instead of a copy of an edition of 1611, an edition that has been changed? They use a present-day edition of the King James Bible because it is far easier to read. They appreciate, perhaps unknowingly, the improvements the later editions have made. They do not like the odd spelling and punctuation of the 1611 edition; they do not want to read “fet” for “fetched,” “sith” for “since” or “moe” for “more,” as the edition of 1611 had it. Thus improvement, when needed, is appreciated, even by those who say they object to any changing of the King James translation. No, God himself authorizes his dedicated servants to translate his Word into understandable language. The fact that King James authorized a Bible translation does not make it the exclusive version that the Author of the original Bible approves his servants to use in any one language. In fact, kingly authorization, instead of great benefits, has brought serious disadvantages.
King James set forth certain rules of procedure. These the translators followed. One of those rules was that “the old Ecclesiastical words [were] to be kept.” Thus the translators were bound to follow the Bishop’s Bible in using certain ecclesiastical words, whether or not these words represented an accurate translation of the original Bible. For example, the ecclesiastical word “bishop” appears in the King James Version, although the original word, correctly translated, merely means “overseer.”
In many respects the beliefs of King James adversely affected the Bible translation called after his name. The translators, feeling somewhat bound to favor the king, were obliged to color the translation with the king’s notions of predestination and kingly rights, as well as with others of the king’s ideas.
It is also apparent from the fact that some of the translators complained that they could not follow their own judgment, being restrained by “reasons of state.” The result: the King James Version is not a true reflection of the minds of the translators of the version. Above all, it comes far short of being a faithful reflection of the mind of Jehovah God, as it appears in the original manuscripts.
JAH....ZEUS. The ZEUS of JAH. It was Greek name for God of the Jews. Romans used it.
@@FireShine-ss4sb It is a poetic shortened form of Jehovah, the name of the Most High God. (Ex 15:1, 2) This abbreviated form is represented by the first half of the Hebrew Tetragrammaton יהוה (YHWH), that is, the letters yohdh (י) and heʼ (ה), the tenth and fifth letters of the Hebrew alphabet respectively. Jah occurs 50 times in the Hebrew Scriptures, 26 times alone, and 24 times in the expression “Hallelujah,” which is, literally, a command to a number of people to “praise Jah.” However, the presence of “Jah” in the original is completely ignored by certain popular versions. (Dy, Mo, RS) The King James Version and An American Translation have it only once, as “Jah” and “Yah” respectively. (Ps 68:4) In the English Revised Version it appears twice in the body of the text (Ps 68:4; 89:8), and in the American Standard Version the full form, Jehovah, is substituted throughout, but these latter two translations in practically every occurrence of the contracted form call it to our attention in footnotes. The New World Translation preserves for the reader all 50 occurrences of Jah, or Yah; and Rotherham’s Emphasised Bible, 49 of them.
@@FireShine-ss4sb Do a bit more research. It was iesus before anything. Iesus H Christos. Never what you said. "Jews" is a made-up word by the Guyym (Gentiles) also. Descendants from the Royal Tribe of Yahudah (my Tribe) are called Yahudym, for the plural. Yahudy for a singular male, and Yahudyth for a singular female. Jah/Yah points to the actual Name of the Creator. YaHUaH. The word switched out for "god" was AL, in some cases, ALuah in others, or ALahym most times & even ALuahym at times. I implore you to dig deeper & pray for byna (understanding). Shalum alykam (Peace be upon you)
It's all about the translation of the Bible from the original ancient Greek.
The 1st act Congress did was to hire a translator to print the 1st American Bible. That Bible is The Aitkens Bible based off The Geneva not King James. They are very similar but The Founders hated King James and The Monarchy which was burning Geneva’s in the days of the Colonies. The Aitkens September 12th 1782 is known as The Revolutionary War Bible.The only thing is,Aitkens took the Apocrypha out which should be in there. The Geneva was present at the signing of the Deceleration of Independence and Constitution . King James thought he and his bloodline were to reign over man. He killed so many Christians that didn’t believe his way. He was a mass murderer. As far as the People escaping England for Religious freedom....They had no Love for King James. There were no printing presses like we have today. All hand written. They had King James Versions for referring to ,to show differences.
I need a Bible. Should I get the Aitkens or the Geneva?
@@sergioortiz1839 Order a Geneva online. Aitkens would be nice too. A 1599 Geneva is small print but has a lot of material George Washington wrote in there. Has a lot of laws passed down from England we kept. It does not have the apocrypha in it. A 1556 Geneva in Old English does. It’s a little harder to read but you should catch on how some of the letters were used differently
@@vanseventy the 1560 Geneva?
@@sergioortiz1839 That is the copy of the original and in Chauncers English with The Apocrypha. I have both. The Patriots edition. It’s small lettering in the Patriots which is 1599. Go with the original because it has the Marginal notes all the translators wrote in there. Queen Mary Tudor married King Philips of Spain and was bringing Catholicism back by beheading if you didn’t convert. Sound like another Religion to you? The translators were hunted by the King and Queen and that’s where a few wrote they Bible was in Geneva. John Calvin hated living there due to the men were allowed to have mistresses by law. Very immoral place back then. The Geneva was written for the plough boy. Referring to the common folk. Poor. Like most of us now. Because no one was allowed to read or write or recite the Bible in anything but Latin back then or you would get your tongue cut out. English was known as the Vulgar tongue then. If you read about the Marian exiles you will understand why this Bible was written. Don’t get the 2 lines of Bible mixed up. The Latin Vulgate was the Catholic Bible and Martin Luther and Geneva are the same just different languages derived from the Greek and Hebrew. They based it off The Subtuagint if I’m not mistaken, The New Testament that is.
The drink Bloody Mary got its name from her. She was responsible for murdering close to 300 translators of the Geneva Bible. They wanted all men to know what God had said for them not a King or Church that kept you under rule by keeping you ignorant.
@@vanseventy I currently have the NKJV and a ESV version. Both were handed down to me by coworkers. I had a feeling there was more to it with all this confusion. My family is catholic and pray to the Virgin Mary. Ever since I became Christian my life has been improving in all areas. I am having a hard time finding the 1556 Geneva Bible. Do you know which sites I could use to purchase one?
Wow i wanna read read Gineava because of the “disobedience to tirants is obedience to GOD”
True, God knew what we’d be up against!
Geneva > KJV. Let's put it this way would you want the PBV (President Biden Version) of the Bible? Thought so.
You are a goofball ...
@@brucedressel4523you, don't have much to say
@@cheese9812 are there any others better than the Geneva ? I’m on a search.
Thank you.
@@cheese9812 what about the Great Bible?
@@code5829 not the Great Bible, as it was commissioned by the Church of England. I mean the best way to go would be to get the textus receptus and translate it to english yourself i suppose. Holy Roman Empire is under the Antichrist, per 1560 Geneva Bible.
The Apocrypha is knowledge too and should be studied and a history of the
time it was noted. 😊
Yes
Roman type print?
Roman Greek interpretation is the problem as they underwrote European into scripture that was stolen from the true people.
Chinese are doing it now saying we can do the same
It’s a print style.
FYI most of the time when people speak there was no j they're speaking there was no letter j in context to the time of yeshua ha mashiach
Yes, i have heard too
Pls get out of that freemasonic 'sacred name / Hebrew roots' movement cult you're in. Research it in an unbiased way.
Calvinists have a murderer for founder. Not a great legacy.
Now I'm super curious. Moses was a murderer to though lol. I've only known KJV so I been doing research. Just want the closest thing since I can't read Hebrew, Aramaic, nor Greek. 😔 Other day Catholics told me KJV is bad cause he took some books out. I gotta find where and how to figure this stuff out
@@jojomafia3851 Who did Moses murder ?
If he did: did he repent ?
After he repented, what were his fruits ?
'Curiosity killed the cat' so, do not be 'curious': be Biblical.
"Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them."Jésus-Christ i.e. God i.e. Adonaï{Authorized Holy King James 1611}
@@jojomafia3851 Who did Moses murder ?
If he did: did he repent ?
After he repented, what were his fruits ?
'Curiosity killed the cat' so, do not be 'curious': be Biblical.
"Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them."Jésus-Christ i.e. God i.e. Adonaï{Authorized Holy King James 1611}
@@njiomonansichristianfreder6374 The Egyptian... then he ran away.. then he got a wife.. its there.