Vincent Bugliosi: No Evidence for JFK / Oswald Conspiracies
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.พ. 2025
- Complete video at: fora.tv/fora/sh...
Author and renowned trial attorney Vincent Bugliosi rejects any notion that Lee Harvey Oswald was acting as part of a conspiracy to assassinate President John F. Kennedy.
-----
Vincent Bugliosi speaks about "Reclaiming History:
The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy" at The Commonwealth Club in San Francisco, California.
The prosecutor of the infamous Charles Manson murder case turns a critical eye on one of history's most enduring sources of conspiracy theories: the murder of JFK. Bugliosi takes us back to the grassy knoll to uphold the "lone gunman" findings of the Warren Commission, saying the claims against it are based on flawed logic, deception and selective use of evidence. -- The Commonwealth Club
Vincent Bugliosi received his law degree in 1964 from U.C.L.A. law school, where he was president of his graduating class. In his career as a prosecutor for the Los Angeles County District Attorney's office, he successfully prosecuted 105 out of 106 felony jury trials, including twenty-one murder convictions without a single loss. His most famous trial was the Charles Manson case, which became the basis of his true crime classic, Helter Skelter, the biggest-selling true crime book in publishing history.
Bugliosi has uncommonly attained success in two separate and distinct fields, as a lawyer and an author. Three of his true crime books, Helter Shelter, And The Sea Will Tell, and Outrage, The Five Reasons Why O.J. Simpson Got Away With Murder, reached number one on the New York Times hardcover bestseller list.
I used to believe the conspiracy theories untill I read his book. I wanted to actually listen to the other view on this because I thought that is what would best honor JFK himself. Give his book a chance even if you don't like reading.
It's really that strong of a book
Bugliosi was a good lawyer but a weak researcher. James DiEugenio ruthlessly destroys the contents of his book with outstanding research by him and others, you should read it and educate yourself.
@@JfK--OBJECTivE maroon
I did read Posner book and like Bugliosi’s book there both speaking about the lone nut,the nobody wanting
Glory but there’s not really anything conclusive that’s with the research I’ve done
but I have an open mind however my research has led me to the simple fact that there were two shooters the who what where I don’t know yet but I can prove two shooters.
So, please give us the prime example of VB's weak research. Many thanks.@@JfK--OBJECTivE
I find it odd that people will believe anything without evidence but with evidence their they refuse to believe it.
There is plenty of evidence that President Kennedy was killed by a homestate conspiracy in the homestate of the next President, a Vice President that wanted to be President if you read real history books. WC didn't tell you JFK was the 2nd Presidential homestate assassination after McKinley. Of course they wouldn't have known that Presidential candidate Robert Kennedy was the third.
note how many Kennedy supporters continued to vote for Ted K. after CHAPPAQUIDDICK - - - Late on the night of July 18, 1969, a black Oldsmobile driven by U.S. Senator Edward Kennedy plunged off the Dike Bridge on the tiny island of Chappaquiddick, off Martha’s Vineyard, landing upside down in the tidal Poucha Pond. The 37-year-old Kennedy survived the crash, but the young woman riding with him in the car didn’t. Though newspaper headlines at the time identified her simply as a “blonde,” she was 28-year-old Mary Jo Kopechne, a respected political operative who had worked on the presidential campaign of Senator Kennedy’s brother, Robert Kennedy. How long was Mary Jo Kopechne alive after the car flipped?
Kopechne likely did not die instantaneously, but her final moments remain a mystery. When John Farrar, a diver for the local fire department, found Kopechne’s body the morning after the crash, its positioning suggested she had remained alive for an unknown period of time after the car went underwater. Her face was pressed into the footwell, and her hands gripped the back of the front seat, as if she had been trying to push her head into a pocket of air.
That old maxim "it's easier to fool people (conspiracy buffs) than to convince them that they have been fooled, is the key here."
@@JeffCrow1313That old maxim. It's easier to fool people (Warren Commission supporters) than to convince people they've been fooled.
Just like OJs case. All the evidence and people still didn't believe the obvious.
Vincent bought paid for
The two shots that hit people in the limo HAD to have come from that window. And who else would have been up there? Everybody else who was in that building STAYED in the building after the shooting. Only one person left: Lee Harvery Oswald. Only one person had ordered that exact gun: Lee Harvey Oswald. Only one person had achieved sharpshooter status in the marines: Lee Harvey Oswald. Only one person fled and killed police officer: Lee Harvey Oswald. Gee, I wonder who fired the shots?
that is absolutely false more than a half dozen folks left after the shooting, more than 20 were absent for the supposed roll call before work ceased that day at the TSBD, the gun is not the only weapon that could have fired the shots and nobody saw oswald fire at the president . gee i wonder how you came to the conclusion without being aware of the facts?
You're right on the money.
absolutely wrong over a half dozen folks didnt return after the shooting and over 20 were missing that day. where you got that idea that oswald was the only one who left? thats not correct at all.
@@simonjames1604 Ok, but none of them owned the rifle that was also found on the sixth floor with Oswald’s prints on it….
@@jetcat132 and again oswalds "prints" were "found " on the weapon only after he died . no chain of evidence. and no way to trace that rifle to oswald, it wasnt ordered in his name, he was never seen picking it up or signing for it. so no chain of evidence there either you suck at this btw. you have no idea who did or did not own that gun.
No evidence? What a joke. Bugliosi is a great orator for the Warren Report which was complete horseshit. It was a joke. They ignored hundreds of witnesses, and the ones who wouldn't shut up were either threatened or died mysteriously. The Fact that Oswald was even allowed to come back to the U.S. after he had tried to defect while being a former U2 Radar technician is ludicrous. Oswald was a bad shot? Yeah, he was. That is why he was perfect for Patsy. There are only two options. Our agencies who are given the task to protect POTUS are either entirely corrupt and incompetent or they WERE IN ON IT. I am going with #2.
I used to believe in a conspiracy but there is no real evidence. Oswald was a loner. No real relationships. Like Priscilla McMillan said “ he didn’t do anything with anybody”. Listen to the people who actually knew him and not those wanting to sell books. I think maybe someone knew his plan but at the end it was just him. This was one of America’s greatest lawyers.
A loner? He was executed before the trial that was held in the court of public opinion, but he was a loner so that wraps it up for you?
@@AMC2283 not just a loner. There’s no real evidence after all these years . He lied about everything.
So many things point to him.
@@Fernando-qk2hp I won’t waste your time tearing apart those things one by one. Just look at the big picture-jfk Oswald ruby Vietnam mlk rfk watergate. What does it really look like?
@@AMC2283 I understand that. Can look like a lot of things but In the end you need proof. Great to agree to disagree in this great country.
Stay well.
Oswald while in the marines was stationed at a base in Japan that was home to U2 spy planes (Atsugi Naval Air Field) and was a top secret facility. He originally left the corp with an honorable discharge then he went to Russia after suddenly renouncing the United States. When he came back home he was not arrested or charged rather he was allowed back in. I've read that the state department paid for his move back to the US. This seems very suspicious especially at a time when the Kennedy administration was ramping up clandistine operation while moving away from overt operations in the wake of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Was Oswald working for the government as some claim? Why would he be filmed handing out pro Castro flyers in New Orleans? It's as if someone is trying to make him look anti-American and if he was, why wasn't he arrested and prosecuted? Why would Oswald bring a weapon to his place of employment and then leave it there with his prints on it? The only person who would do such a thing is a person who WANTS to get caught. Why were the Dallas detectives unable to get a fingerprint off the weapon until 3 days after the shooting, after Oswald was dead, and after the feds went to the funeral home to take his prints? The police said they saw Oswald in the break room about 90 seconds after the shooting. He appeared calm and was not breathing heavily. Oswald was also seen a few minutes before the shooting by another employee in the break room at the TSBD. The motorcade, depending on what source you believe, was running between 5 to 15 minutes late. The shooter could not have known in advance about the delay unless there were others involved. The shooter would have to have been in position at least a few minutes before the scheduled arrival of the President until when he actually arrived late. It's all but impossible that Oswald was in the 6th floor window at the time of the shooting. Finally, only Dallas county had the authority to conduct the autopsy and the trial of Oswald. Since neither was done in accordance with the law, one can at this point only conclude that Oswald is not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The so called "evidence" would never stand up in a court of law.
@stddisclaimer8020 Reclaiming history has been totally discredited and relegated to the trash heap of history though one might still be able to find a copy or two in the fiction section of a remote library. Its about as worthless as your completely uninformed opinion.
Senator Robert swiecher said everywhere we looked with Oswald we found the fingerprints of US intelligence.
Such as...?
@@goodgood9955 see jfk and the unspeakable by Jim Douglass
The Warren Ommision Report on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy : Man's greatest work of fiction!😂😂 2:59 2:59 😂
I'm at disc 8 at the moment, and the depth and breadth of his book is simply astounding. The refutations of conspiracy-theorists' claims, and pointing out where they're obviously lying, sure have made the book worth it for me.
I can recommend it to anyone, who has any doubt that Oswald was the sole killer, who acted alone.
Read the other Vince Vince Palamara's Honest Answers then get back to us if you were actually gullible enough to believe Bugliosi.
@@vernpascal1531 exactly
Don't bother. They won't read it. They'll poopoo all over it without ever laying an eye on one word in it.
@@vernpascal1531 really has nothing to do with being gullible. It's about weighing both sides.
If it wasn`t Oswald who killed Kennedy, then Kennedy wasn`t killed on 22 November 1963.
Exactly, people honestly think the CIA would use a guy like Oswald, and then leave him out on the street after the murder. Like Bugliosi said, a car would have waiting to take him to his death.
He was the perfect guy to use and was used. How many Communists in his orbit compared to US Intelligence Assets? About 2 dozen of the latter to Zero!
this assumes there was no car waiting , there is footage of a rambler leaving the scene right after the shooting. given some of the other folks the cia have used who were three times crazier than oswald , vince doesnt know what he was talking about as per usual. which is why its a bad idea to trust the writings of someone who was far more nuts than oswald writing on the subject. the DAs office would be "crazy" to use someone as unhinged as bugliosi but they did. some stuff just happens despite how stupid it seems once one knows all the facts.
@@simonjames1604 VB was far more nuts than Oswald? Please read VB's books, they are infinitely more sane than the myriad of conspiracy books I read.
@@MrWolfmantim that doesnt mean bugliosi isnt a nut ball cause he certainly was. you can easily find the paper trail of vinces various sins, he accused his milkman of having an affair with his wife and being the secret father of one of his children and harrassed the man for years breaking the law repeatedly in the process, including using his office to get information on the man and his whereabouts while lying to the police and the fbi why he needed the info. his wife stated she though vince had an undiagnosed mental issue and needed help. i mean theres more than just that story out there, but vince could never move forward in his career because these cases became public knoweldge in the 70s and he had to give up all his political ambitions. he had more than one screw loose.
@@simonjames1604 A nutcase who got Charles Manson convicted when Manson wasn't at either of the murders...yeah I'll take that "nutcase" any time. Sounds like YOU don't know what you're talking about and while you're at it why not post that footage of the Rambler leaving the Depository Bldg.
Bugliosi's book is a must read - convinced me beyond any doubt that Oswald acted alone and Ruby acted alone. Those who believe in a conspiracy - read the book or pertinent part of the book first then say your piece
his work on ruby is pretty good, his work on oswald? he is selective about what he presents and what he omits. if your case is that good you can enter in some of the witnesses who contradict your position and you can include their statements that throw doubt on the case. for example wesley frazier claims the "curtain rods" package was not big enough to contain even a disasambled rifle. he was arrested and "pressured" into signing a confession which he refused to do and claims that if oswald did do it , it had to be a conspiracy as he needed he help to pull it off. again vince simply ignores testimony and eyewitnesses like this when they say things he doesnt like.
Wow. I genuinely pity you. You were duped. And you wasted a LOT of time reading a fraudulent book written on behalf of the Deep State by a known con artist. Tom O’Neill’s book “Chaos”, completely exposes Bugliosi, picks him apart, and sources in detail how he was completely compromised. If you read the book, you will come to see just how bad of a guy Bugliosi was.. he was downright evil, tbh, and a genuine piece of shit.
@@simonjames1604 why were the curtain rods never found?
@@bryanmack4054 according to marina oswald and wesley beulls mother and dougherty at the TSBD they never existed , oswald had his lunch according to the first two and nothing according to the third, so the majority of witnesses stated there was never any "curtain rods" to begin with. so you have to accept the testimony of the only other person charged in the murder of kennedy as the only one telling the truth. oswald told the police beull was mistaken and he never said a word about curtain rods and all he had was his lunch. if the rifle got in the building that day , nobody saw it going in .
@@simonjames1604from my understanding of most accounts, Oswald was a quiet loner who was always in the background and kinda forgettable. He may have unintentionally used that to his advantage to hide the gun as he walked in to the TSBD and hid away on the 6th floor that day
This man was a treasure...what a shame such an intellect succumbed to cancer a few years ago...his book is far and away the most comprehensive tome on the assassination...problem is, the folks who embrace conspiracy simply are not interested in pursuing the truth of the matter. Mr. B did express hope, that his book will be used as a classroom reference, many years from now...But for the time being, our country will remain divided about this case...Bugliosi even discusses this aspect of denial, in his book!...This man is a real patriot, for even trying to persuade his fellow Americans to wake up and embrace the truth!
Well in the more intelligent rooms it will serve as THE BOOK to read. What has happened over past couple yrs is the right has taken to it. The left was front and center of thusly particular case, not anymore
He was a liar in need of attention. His book is falsehood from cover to cover.
Vince was a psychopathic liar and cheater. He WAS a scumbag his entire life. Just happened to be a DA. Guy is the meridian Webster definition of a liar.
So what I’m saying is, Vince was a meaningless piece of shit, like you.
You’re an idiot
"Three people can keep a secret but only if two of them are dead"
According to the conspiracy theorists over 100 died between 1963 and 1976, which would probably discourage others from talking.
Understanding the medical evidence is the key to the assassination. Four official bodies (Warren Commission, HSCA, Church Committee, Rockefeller Commission) employed panels of expert pathologists to study the autopsy X-rays and photos. (The original photos are crystal-clear compared to the pirated versions found on the internet.) The head wound was examined by seventeen pathologists, the back wound by fifteen. These experts UNANIMOUSLY agreed that JFK was hit by two bullets fired from the rear - one striking him in the upper back, the other in the back of the head - with both bullets exiting toward the front of his body.
The documentary "Cold Case JFK" (available on TH-cam and highly recommended!) includes an examination of the X-rays of JFK's skull by a team at the Boston University School of Medicine. Their analysis confirmed that the fracturing pattern in the skull was consistent with a bullet strike to the back of JFK's head.
Correct.
Which set of autopsy photos did the experts view? There were at least two sets.
I use to believe in a conspiracy. After reading his book and others I have changed my mind. Oswald was a trouble young man and acted alone.
You should have saved your time and money and just read the Warren Commission Report...
Good on you, most people just ignore the facts and double down on the conspiracy.
This guy has no credibility
Come on, be honest, are you compensated somehow for posting things like that? Next you'll tell me his Helter Skelter theory was a logical, conclusive explanation of Manson's motive.
If you're interested in a factual account, DANIEL P SHEEHAN taught a university level course on the JFK thing. It's still posted on TH-cam.
Bugliosi is a conspiracy theorist; unscrupulous, even by lawyer standards and dangerously unstable according to his own wife. He's a court jester. The last person anyone should take serious. Knowing the source is vital when buying a narrative.
and what do you do with the Zapruder movie? and what do you do with CNN's audio of the police mike that proved by audio experts that there were at least 4 shots? really? you choose one source to believe and ignore the rest?
He ran into the theater after he shot a cop who just wanted to ask him a question. Before he shot the cop, Oz was walking in the opposite direction. Oz expected to be shot at the Depository. That's why the day before he gave his life savings to his wife. That's why after the shooting he ran to his apt. to get a pistol. He never expected to walk away from it.
Appreciate the comment. Again, I see conspiracy supporters in the light of things like this being their religion. There's no amount of proof that can be offered to stop them from thinking what they want to think. I don't argue or debate, after reading Vince's book there really is nothing left to debate. Whoever chooses to believe conspiracy with regard to JFK, will do so no matter what. I'm ok with it, but I know better.
Considering the publication of “Chaos” by Tom O’Neill......your comment aged incredibly poorly my friend. You were badly duped by a charlatan
@@BillyBob-ec5ox he wasnt duped. He's a sellout doing his influencer 'job' by posting here.
So you tell us Oswald was wreckless, unreliable, and unstable.
So, no, they wouldn't trust him to shoot JFK. But it would make him the absolute perfect patsy.
Actually, LHO had $13.87 on him, not $13. That extra 87 cents might have taken him a long way, LOL
Its good to be accurate he was headed for the 55.
All Vincent does here is set up straw man arguments that he can knock down. He presents NO evidence linking Oswald to the murder. Nitrate test did not show LHO had fired a rifle, the first rifle found was a Mauser, then it was switched to the M-C but no fingerprints, then fingerprints were "discovered" on the rifle after LHO's death. I agree that Oswald was not the guy conspirators would hire to do the job. That's the whole point! LHO was set up to take the fall. Real hit men did it.
Yes bug loves the strawman.
Bugliosi has 53 pieces of evidence linking Oswald to the murder.
And Oswald was such a flake nobody would rely on him even to be at a given place and time to be a patsy.
Who thinks Oswald conspired with the CIA or the mob?
And we are meant to swallow the helter skelter theory from that mouth
@TermsofService someone who is so knowledgeable about law like Bugliosi and, evidently you, would know that at the very least, it was not a fair trial...not even close...motion to change venue was denied despite a surge in gun sales because people were scared....Manson wasn't even allowed to defend himself. It was a joke. And if you still have your head buried so deep in the sand to think that Oswald was a line gunman, they you are truly stupid beyond any hope.
@TermsofService Bugliosi prosecuted the case! Of course he isn't going to say it wasn't a fair trial! That case made him rich and famous.
"Unwisely" bringing up JFK? Bugliosi is discussing it in this video!
It sounds like you believe every lie that is spoonfed on TV.
@TermsofService actually....there is documented evidence that JFK's head was mutilated between the time he arrived at the hospital and his body was taken for autopsy. Scores of witnessed say they heard gun shots from the grassy knoll of but their testimony was never sought by the Warren Commission. Why not? If there is no conspiracy to cover up why not hear ALL the witnessed? Why was the Zapruder film confiscated and doctored before being shown to the public? What are they hiding? Stray bullets that would completely dispell the lone gunman theory? There are still more files to be declassified next year. Many are still reacted so we can't see all the names involved. Why is it a matter of national security at this point, over 60 years after the fact? FBI memo released where J. Edgar Hoover stated that the public MUST believe that Oswald acted alone. That's not suspicious or anything...and we know what an upstanding citizen of the world Hoover was. Evidence was deliberately left out. All the Warren Commission report provided was more questions than answers. When the story doesn't align with the evidence, then something is being covered up. If you actually trust the govt then I feel sorry for how naive you are.
@TermsofService Manson was denied his right to a fair trial. President Nixon declared him guilty, it was all over the newspapers. Manson held up a paper in court with the headline "MANSON GUILTY, NIXON DECLARES!" That should have been a mistrial. I'm not a crack pot conspiracy theorist...I'm just not gullible like you.
@TermsofService I could give two flying fucks what your dumbass laughs at.
Bugliosi is uncannily brilliant and intuitive. More people should listen to what he has to say. He is one of those rare people who actually make sense.
Lmaooo he’s a complete lunatic what are you talking about 😭
@@pitnotthepalace4744Vince was right on and made complete sense and he smashed all the stupid conspiracy theories. What are YOU talking about. Name one thing he was wrong about
His entire ~1600 page tomb is based on the “argument from authority”… it is a truly impressive work, and after reading all the dizzying facts and testimonies, you’re left without a doubt, Oswald killed JFK.. until you begin to ask who the people were that he mentions who conduct these tests (he does in fact name them and their companies).. where do they get their funding? Did Bugliosi receive any funding? If so from whom?
His entire life’s work is based off of reframing the proven incorrect conclusions the WC came to.. once your deconstruct his “science” on how there were 3 bullets, they matched Oswald, so on, literally the entire.. THE ENTIRE argument falls apart.. which it does.
Bugliosi ignores evidence, period. Don’t make the same intellectually lazy mistake of lumping all “conspiracy theorists” together as crack pots.. because as it stands in 2023, the majority of the US population doesn’t believe LHO was a single shooter alone, and we simply have more evidence than the side you take.. real evidence to be specific.
Love you girl sorry if that hurt.
@@josephcwynar7100 this is 2025, not 2012. Get with the times. Bugliosi was ruthlessly and methodically destroyed for good by Tom O’Neill in “Chaos.” He methodically proves Bugliosi’s intentions going all the way back to the Helter Skelter book. He was a Government/CIA stooge on the payroll. He was not an independent writer working on his own accord and research. He had an assigned task just like those on the Warren Commission, and it had nothing to do with revealing the truth. He was a fraud and his legacy is in tatters
@@BobBrand-z8s Conspiracy nonsense. Bugliosi nailed Manson and Oswald acted alone. Deal with it. And say hi to Bigfoot for me and the flatearthers you must hang out with.
I recommend everybody to watch, The Joe Rogan Experience ep 1459 with Tom O'Neill... and please buy O'Neill's book
: Chaos: Charles Manson, the CIA, and the Secret History of the Sixties
He also goes after Bugliosi who is a ffing lunatic...
I just finished the book and it’s incredible. I’m kind of shocked that Bugliosi isn’t accusing his milkman of having something to do with the assassination.
Except his book has not evidence or definitive conclusions, just ad hominem attacks.
@@spearfisherman308 these stories about vince arent new they have been in print before and every time bugliosi tried to run for higher office these very real things he did would rear their head. so get your head out of the sand and do the research, i knew all about vinces past and i have never even read toms book . this stuff isnt a secret if you bother to research
@@simonjames1604 except they were made to s,ear him when he ran for office and they were settled out of court also the milkman story was because he thought that he was stealing from him not sleeping with his wife.
@@spearfisherman308 no they were not meant to smear him, politicians face this kind of nonsense routinely , the probem vince faced is these cases were very real and vince actually went to court and lost vs the milkman , his "they were stealing money from me" was not that story the milkman and his wife told. instead they told the story of an obsessed and unhinged individual, his fathering of children with other women was also proven in court and not made up to besmearch him. but nice try, he couldnt move forward not because folks were lying about him but because they were telling the truth
The basic problem here, Rob, is that it has been well-known for more than 40 years that the WC did not investigate as well as they could have on many issues. But most of those issues have since been thoroughly investigated and the basic conclusions the WC made stand the test of time.
Parenti, unfortunately, has an ax to grind in terms of a supposed "agenda" from the WC etc, as illustrated by the quotes I pulled out. But focussing on the WC ignores that these gaps have been filled.
I agree with Darby Crash concerning this whole episode
That’s just simply not true, lol. The “single shooter” claim, for example, has been completely debunked, scientifically and otherwise, on every notable scale. It simply didn’t happen that way. The shots came from different directions. The Zapruder film shows a FRONT shot to the head. A shot from the Depositary simply couldn’t have had that effect. By physics, it’s simply IMPOSSIBLE for there to have been only one shooter. The Magic bullet theory is a complete clown show. As for Bugliosi, he is a discredited hack, and was really a pretty sleazy guy. Chaos by Tom O’Neill methodically picks him apart. It exposes both his lies/errors, and his corrupt motivations
Oswald! He was the killer and he did it alone. Period.
jay herzog , why didn't he take credit??? Plus nitrate tests came back negative, he denied it!
Oswald was a total liar. He thought he was smarter that everybody. He was going to test the system to the limit. Claimed police brutality when he was arrested. Bought the guns under phony name using a PO box. He was going to use every legal method to deny this and fight the system to the limit. You have to understand Oswald. The fact that he denied it is exactly in line with his character. He made so many flat out bullshit statements it's unbelievable.If you really study his life the Kennedy and Tippit shootings makes perfect sense.
jay herzog , how come All the files haven't been released? 54 years later! What Are they hiding?? Plus limo was washed and scrubbed that after noon contaminating the crime scene! Motorcycle cop 10-15 feet BEHIND the limo was hit with such force with JFKS brain matter that the cop thought he was shot indicating a shot from the front. Plus Oswald was located in the 2nd floor not 90 seconds after the final shot (he was also on the 2nd floor 15 minutes b4 the assasination. Drs at Parkland said that throat wound was a wound of entry! I can go on and on!
Why did some many people run towards the grassy knoll area? Another fact is that shots 2 and 3 were on top of each other! It was bang.....bang,bang according to many.
How about the many witnesses who died (many under mysterious circumstances)?
For me, two of the many critical points are:
Why was Oswald allowed to flee the TSBD? Why wasn’t there a secret agent getting a drink on the 6th floor when the third shot fired? Bang-bang, and you have pictures of Oswald’s corpse in the sniper’s nest, holding on to the rifle, and no conspiracy fuel.
Why on Earth would Oswald have been allowed a press conference, where he could have blabbed about his handlers and paymasters, blowing the whole case wide open? And it is known that Jack Ruby himself was present.
@Std Disclaimer So, Johnson and Hoover are having lunch across the street from Johnson's house, (Arthur Robert Caro, "Master of the Senate") at his neighbor of 19 years and 30 years as "friends." (TH-cam, May 8th, 1964 Ceremony) Johnson is listening to Hoover rant and rave against the Kennedy's as usual and how he wished Johson had become President in 1960 instead of JFK. Johnson then responded with "Well I can if you didn't do such a good job protecting the President, I'd be President." Johnson made FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover Lifetime FBI Director shortly after JFK was killed in his polittical homestate, Texas. This action was legally questionable because Hoover was conducting an FBI investigation with Johnson's Commission called the Warren Commission into JFK's assassination and this action by Johnson could be interpreted as undue influence or conflict of interest, as if a pay off. The fact that it was not reported by the Warren Report that JFK was the 2nd Presidential assassination in a row after President McKinley, to be killed in a Vice President's homestate, his political home turf, shows biase in favor of Johnson. While Johnson was still President and Hoover was still the Director at 73, not having to retire by Johnson's decree, RFK was assassinated in the homestate of the next President, another Vice President, ex-Vice President and presidential rival, Richard Nixon, benifiting Nixon not having to debate another Kennedy on National TV again and benifiting Johnson and Hoover that they would not have to worry about being investigated for involvement in JFK's assassination by President Robert Kennedy. This method of operation or MO was similarly repeated again in the 2000 Florida voting controversy that caused a great amount of suspicion that the controversy was a homestate conspiracy by the opposing party because it happened in the homestate of the brother of the next President, the son of a Vice President that wanted to be President again thru his son, Bush41. To much to be a one time coincidence but a perponderance of evidence of homestate conspiracy. We may never really know who was totally behind this or involved but we will know the Kennedy's were killed in a conspiracy, a homestate conspiracy that could happen again if we let it. January 6th was a warning but Florida is waiting again.
But the lone gunman theory hinges on the theory that this lone nut wanted fame, infamy etc …yet he is denying committing any murder in the hall and bizarrely there are no notes of his interrogation. I have worked with cops - any big enough case they are going to play hero in front of media when a suspected perp is caught. No is suggesting Dallas PD was involved.
@@irisharan3038 Oswald wasn't looking to be caught. But he was trying to get in with a group called Fair Play for Cuba. Kennedy ordered the failed Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba. Oswald's wife, Marina, noticed that Oswald's rifle was missing on the day of the assassination, while a colleague giving Oswald a lift to work on a different day than usual asked Oswald what the wrapped bundle on his back seat was, and Oswald said, "curtain rods". Oswald's rifle was found in the "sniper's nest" in Oswald's place of work. It was an easy shot since the car was moving in a straight line away from the shooter. The Grassy Knoll would have been a lousy place to shoot from, and a shooter on the overpass would have been too conspicuous.
And only one person ran from the Texas School Book Depository: Lee Harvey Oswald. He definitely shot dead Officer Tippet for asking him to identify himself. He ran into a theatre (UK sp) and when police apprehended him, he fought them and kept trying to draw his revolver, which is why an officer slugged him.
There is no evidence that another or more shooters carried out the assassination, and Oswald is bang to rights, and he was in the optimal place to carry it out and he had the means and the training.
Cause he knew if he spoke there would be a worse fate waiting for him in jail.
@@Dragonblaster1 the guy who gave oswald a ride to work? he has stated repeatedly and strenously that the "package" he observed was far too small to even contain a disasambled rifle, his sister testified to the same thing. 2 nobody knows why tippet stopped oswald there were no close witnesses to that event and the only person who did witness it was described by one WRC investigator as "a nut case 3 if oswald pulled a gun at the theatre why was he not charged with attempted murder on a police officer? also have you been on elm street? its not an "easy shot" at all as the road is not a straight street at all but curves all the way to the railroad bridge. why would a grassy knoll shot have been any more conspicious? you are talking about a large area with plenty of cover and easy escape routes available. the open and shut case on oswald isnt as open and shut as some make it seem. getting a conviction would have been a slog you have no dierct evidence , nobody at the paine house saw oswald with a rifle, nobody who gave oswald a ride to work saw oswald with a rifle nobody at oswalds work saw him with a rifle. there are reasons conspiracy folks are able to make a case here and you have to acquaint yourself with some of these issues or you are going to end up making more questionable posts like these
First time I've ever commented on any "Oswald" site.
I know Vince Bugliosi and I own the largest Warren Commission archive in the world. I own virtually everything which was returned to the family by the US Government. If you don't want to take the time to read Vince's book, you can buy a 15 disc audio book for around $20. Even with my expertise on the subject....after the first 10 minutes, I was captivated. This book will give you a minute by minute account of all people involved. No conspiracy
You are so wrong. The Stretcher Bullet existence is proof there was a plan. How could it be perfect, no blood, and sitting on a stretcher with Connally? It was placed there as a Red Herring. Connally was buried with his bullet. July 17, 1993
I suppose you are trying to attract attention
vince ignored witness testimony he didnt like, so its easy to say no conspiracy when you are selective on who the witnesses are and what they say.
In the 60s, James Randi had a radio talk show. He had as guest pioneer conspirafraud Mark Lane. Randi asked Lane if JFK was shot from front, why is there no bullet hole in windshield? Lane stammered and stuttered they musta switched windshields. Zapruder film shows nothing happening to windshield.
@TheShel10 This is my last posting if you do not look at Zapruder Film Slow & Zapruder Stabilized that is the 4th time I asked you Right after the sigh he is hit in the throat, means shot from the front means CONSPIRACY. Go it ?
Vincent Bugliosi, speaking on May 27, 2007, tells an audience that no one has leaked information regarding their own involvement in the JFK assassination, even though in the April 5, 2007 issue of Rolling Stone, former CIA officer E. Howard Hunt’s deathbed confessional was published.
After Hunt's death, Howard St. John Hunt and David Hunt stated that their father had recorded several claims about himself and others being involved in a conspiracy to assassinate President John F. Kennedy.[3][65] Notes and audio recordings were made. In the April 5, 2007, issue of Rolling Stone, St. John Hunt detailed a number of individuals purported to be implicated by his father, including Lyndon B. Johnson, Cord Meyer, David Atlee Phillips, Frank Sturgis, David Morales, Antonio Veciana, William Harvey, and an assassin he termed "French gunman grassy knoll" who many presume was Lucien Sarti.[3][66] The two sons alleged that their father cut the information from his memoirs to avoid possible perjury charges.[65] According to Hunt's widow and other children, the two sons took advantage of Hunt's loss of lucidity by coaching and exploiting him for financial gain and furthermore falsified accounts of Hunt's supposed confession.[65] The Los Angeles Times said they examined the materials offered by the sons to support the story and found them to be "inconclusive".
Not credible
@@billmcleod6693 Sure they did after the fact constantly trying to cash in How many people confesses let's see Howard Hunt James Files etc etc etc.
@@billmcleod6693 Yeah, that's all been debunked. Rolling Stone Magazine is not a legitimate source for JFK researchers.
@@billmcleod6693 High Times once published an article claiming MLK Jr was killed in a CIA conspiracy. Guess what, Rolling Stone and High Times are no better than a tabloid.
@pat442389 I agree. Bugliosi is doing a great job at promoting his book. He's a trained prosecutor at showing the Lone Assassin side of the story every well.
he was a nutcase and very selective in what he chose to mention. not really the kind of person you could trust to cover the truth at all.
Bugliosi appeals to his audience's common sense. If anyone is guilty of misdirection, as well as other bad things, it's the conspiracy authors. Randi rules!
Lots has leaked out. WTF is he talking about? How do you think the conspiracy theorists keep going? This cover-up leaks like a sieve.
Charles Givens saw Oswald on the 6th floor at 11:55 AM The Warren Commission tells us that after Givens left the 6th floor, Oswald then went about building the sniper's nest made up of book cartons. The Commission found that each carton of books weighed between 50 and 55 pounds. I just viewed the wall of cartons used to make up the sniper's nest and counted over 30 book cartons. Bonnie Ray Williams arrived on the 6th floor at 12 noon and began eating his lunch at a window adjacent to the sniper's window, a distance of only 12 feet away. Williams remained on the 6th floor until 12:20 PM. Williams testified that while on the 6th floor he hadn't seen or HEARD anyone. The Commission also said that Oswald had to assemble the Carcano rifle. Question? How was it possible for Oswald to move and pile a minimum of 1500 pounds of books to build the sniper's nest; then assemble the rifle, and do all this without Williams hearing him do it? If Williams hadn't decided to vacate the 6th floor at 12:20, would the assassination have been called off? Logic dictates that if Williams had remained on the 6th floor, JFK's assassin would had to have killed Williams, since Williams would have been able to identify the assassin. Question? Is it possible that Depository employee Williams was working with JFK's killers, acting as an "inside guard or spotter", whose job was to ensure that no other employee would approach the sniper's nest, and if someone had come up to the 6th floor, perhaps Williams job was to persuade and lead the intruder off the 6th floor and back downstairs?
This guy literally makes my stomach turn
bartbengal explain please
He lied about the Manson case.
Komfy Koala he put an extremely dangerous, manipulative man behind bars. He could lie for the rest of his life and his sins should have been absolved.
@@coreilly796 Everyone implicated in the Manson case was guilty and deserved jail time, I won't argue agains that point. However his narrative focuses on sensationalizing the murders as opposed to supplying truth to readers.
bartbengal The Warren Commission got it right. The HSCA got it wrong. There was no fourth shot. Of the 178 witnesses in Dealey Plaza 81% heard three shots.
The problem with both Committees is they thought the Zapruder Film recorded the assassination from beginning to end. Thanks to Max Holland and Johann Rush we now know the Zapruder film, does not depict an assassination about to commence. It shows one that had already started. Zapruder had started, then stopped filming 7 seconds in. When he restarted filming, the first shot had already been fired by LHO. So Oswald didn’t fire three shots in 6 seconds, he fired three shots in 11 seconds.
A) The first shot was obstructed by traffic light pole and glanced off. (105 feet distance to JFK)
B) Oak tree obscured and delayed second shot (briefly).This accounts for the overwhelming testimony by witnesses as to the shot pattern: One...pause...Two...Three. Also, it matches the distribution of the three cartridges on the 6th Floor.
C) The second shot went through President Kennedy and Governor Connelly. (190 feet distance to JFK)
D) The third shot was fatal. (275 feet distance to JFK)
You can spend the rest of your life looking for ghosts, bogeyman, and shady characters. I got off that endless merry-go-round years ago. JFK conspiracy “die hards” will forever keep looking at irrelevant, insignificant, and proven falsehoods to keep their delusional conspiracy theories alive. You are cursed to keep looking and wandering the earth trying to find something that isn’t there. I understand the psychology behind your pursuit. But still, it’s sad.
I know 100% LHO shot and killed JFK. He acted alone. I know 100% LHO shot and killed J.D. Tippit. He acted alone. I know 100% that Jack Ruby shot and killed LHO. He acted alone.
CSI: Dallas 1963. Case closed.
Vincent was a class act and a tremendously intelligent man! His book
Reclaiming History was a masterpiece and if anyone who reads it cannot
believe in a conspiracy. To do otherwise is to also believe in Santa
Clause and the Tooth Fairy!
Okay...let's run with this...tell me what you believe is the most telling piece of evidence that points to Oswald being the only individual involved in this case..please...
More chance of a visit by the Tooth Fairy than Oswald alone, it's ridiculous, it's insulting and you have to dismiss tons of good witnesses, and make unbelievable excuse, after unbelievable excuse, to spout" like a good robot Oswald did it".
Global Jay is what we in the research community call a "lone nutter". JFK was supposedly hit from behind, but his body went backward, not forward. Ruby just happened to stop by the Dallas police station, just happened to have a gun in his pocket, just happened to get by police security and shot Oswald at the exact moment he was led out into the parking lot. Just "lucky", eh? Oswald was seen in New Orleans with members of Alpha 66, a group of vehement anti-Castro Cubans and connected to the CIA and the Bay of Pigs fiasco. "Coincidence"? The lone nutters are full of it. The Edgewood Arsenal tests prove CE 399 could not have hit both Kennedy ad Connally. Further confirmed by the testimonies of two autopsy technicians, Paul O'Connor and Jim Jenkins who witnessed the probe of Kennedy's back making indentations on the pleura. Many medical witnesses at both Dallas and Bethesda testified to damage in back of the head, absent in the autopsy photos. There's so much wrong with the official verdict, it screams for another investigation.
@TermsofService I've seen Vince many times speak of the points he tries to make in his book...I've seen him debate and he uses nothing but WC evidence to back his conclusions and the WC findings were decided before it began. Use only the evidence that could point to Oswald. Omit the witnesses and evidence that say otherwise. I know what's in his fairytale book...
@TermsofService You know, there's a great line in the film JFK where Kevin Costner as Garrison is speaking on the single bullet theory and says something along these lines... 'a physics professor can make the argument that you can tie an elephant's tail to a daisy and keep it from falling off a cliff'...or something similar. That's what Bug is good at...a good example is when he speaks of the change in the route and asks; The route was changed 4 days before the assassination. Could they really have planned all this using Oswald in 4 days?' Gullible folks let that slide right over them without pondering that question. But you and I know they planned it much earlier than that...don't we? Same with the mauser vs the carcano. The entire world was initially told the weapon was a mauser, but lo and behold...the 3 witnesses...well, only 2 actually changed their story even though they were all very familiar with rifles and identifying them. Gee, Walter Cronkite is reporting it so it must be true! Dozens upon dozens of these tidbits. And of-course the one witness that stuck to his guns committed suicide with a 22 rifle shot to his chest in his father's basement, even though he owned pistols...of-course. But he was a no-good cop...right TOS?
@renduke In a court, it'd be a slam-dunk in terms of linking Oswald to the assassination. I don't think many people are aware just how much evidence links Oswald to the murder. There is NO reasonable doubt as to his guilt, though most CTs aren't reasonable. AS for conspiracy, that's harder to rule out, but as I said above, lacking specific evidence linking him means no determination can be made. There have been many claims, but most are dubious.
Actually just the opposite
the lead da in dallas had told hoover on sunday that they didnt have enough to convict oswald , his case was completly circumstantial with several key "witnesses" turrning out to be fairly useless ( notably helen markham the lone witness to the tippet murder, and brennan whos "id" of oswald was deemed useless when he failed to pick oswald out of a police line up). nobody at the paine house could testify to oswald taking a rifle directly, the person who gave him a ride to work said the package was not a rifle, etc the case was a lot lot harder than you think . vince does a good job of selectively ignoring anything "difficult" in his book which is a diservice to the reader. if he was so sure of himself he should have been a lot more transparent than he was.
@@ryanwilliams6206 No, he’d have been buried by the evidence.
I promise you.
@@simonjames1604 Haha that’s bullshit nice try.
@@jetcat132 no its not bullshit you troll. its correct. and as late as 69 lead investigator curry was telling the dallas morning news they didnt have enough to convict oswald, you are just a mental midget,. or a troll.,."buried by the evidence" what a tool you are .
@robmanzanedo Marina to America. Oswald was a VERY unusual case. There were perhaps a dozen US defectors to Russia in those years, his return may be unprecedented. But there are numerous factors here for the Soviets - Oswald knew nothing of import in Russia, neither did Marina. He was more a headache than anything else, but he'd be able to raise a storm if his wife wasn't with him. Since there were no security risks involved, her travel though unusual wasnt sinister
I think this guy is making the same kind of assumptions that others make in the other direction. What makes sense to him is what he sees. Just like when this doesn't make sense to some they find something else that does. The truth of the matter is that flat out we will NEVER know for sure everything about this case. Just like you will never know if O.J. really did or not. Too many redacted documents...too much hidden....too long has gone by. I can respect Bugliosi but I do not agree.
Nope...you underestimate evaluating evidence!
Finally someone brings rationality to this stupid conspiracy
You can't see straight
I had much respect for this man
Mr. Bugliosi didn't realize in his mindless defense of the indefensible...The Warren Report, that it ushered in the complete insanity of The Trump Presidency Phenomenon.
@@vernpascal1531 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH - - - DEMOCRAT Obama and his officials at the Treasury Department and State Department were clear: They would work assiduously to freeze out Iran from getting dollars to fund its mischief and mayhem around the world.
The Associated Press, puts it this way: "As the Treasury and State Department worked behind the scenes to help Iran access the dollar, the message to Congress remained the same: The JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) did not allow Iran to access the U.S. financial system." that's the conclusion of a report by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. It alleges Obama officials pushed the U.S. Treasury to let Iran convert the equivalent of $5.7 billion of funds held in Oman's Bank of Muscat from rials into dollars and subsequently into euros. It's important to note that the Iran nuclear deal also removed some $100 billion in sanctions on Iran. This made Iran once again a big player in the Mideast. It's almost certain that a good piece of that went to the Islamic Revolutionary Guards, which by some accounts control as much as 40% of Iran's economy.
It's clear from Obama administration actions, under both his Secretaries of State, Hillary Clinton and John Kerry, that the Obama White House despised Israel and did all they could to undermine its security. How else can you explain the enabling of a terrorist-supporting regime?
The Obama administration failed to enforce its own "red line" in Syria on chemical weapons. By doing so, it in effect invited both Russia and Iran into that disintegrating country. Iranian troops today are within striking distance of our one true ally in the region, Israel.
how do you feel about him now?
@@andrewbrookes7025 not good
I knew exactly what he meant, and so does everyone else. Even you knew what he meant... his reference to Russia as the Soviet Union is a matter of semantics. In the final analysis, it's the same place. This guy is an incredible prosecutor that has never lost a murder trial, he is 21 out of 21. He also convinced, beyond a reasonable doubt, a jury comprised of Dallas citizens that LHO was guilty of assassinating President Kennedy. Thus, raising issue with his "credibility" makes you an idiot.
Zapruder’s film did capture the assassination, just not all of it. He missed Oswald’s first shot. And Oswald missed his first shot too. This means Oswald didn’t fire three shots in 6 seconds. He fired three shots in 11 seconds. The first shot glanced off a traffic light pole. The second shot went through President Kennedy and Governor Connelly. The third shot was fatal.
The Zapruder film, we now know, does not depict an assassination about to commence. It shows one that had already started. One man. One rifle. Three shots. Eleven seconds. Dallas, TX November 22, 1963.
Well said, Jack! The "traffic light pole" theory is explored in the documentary "JFK The Lost Bullet" - highly recommended. It also includes state-of-the-art enhancements of several of the home movies taken during the assassination. The Hughes film in particular clearly shows a figure in the 6th. floor window of the "sniper's nest".
Nope...more like 8 seconds....more than enough time to fire those three shots.
hate this type of people… turn shameless lying into a career
Just like all of the conspiracy authors you guys follow?
Problem is, people that think there was a conspiracy can't explain any of that at all
No, "Problems is" the Warren Commission never explained/ proved that there wasn't a conspiracy.
@@MrAmbassador11 which one?
@@timhorpo Niether; the Warren Commission never proved a case nor did they explain any possible motive. Oswald's "guilt" was decided prior to those shots in Dealy Plaza. J. Edgar Hoover calling from Washington DC telling the DPD had "their man" and that there were no "confederates" at a time when the DPD were still trying to sort out who they had arrested. How did Hoover know that, just after Oswald had been arrested? He solved the case from 1400 miles away?
@@MrAmbassador11 'never proved its case"? Rubbish. As well as, they never have to prove motive. No one needs to prove motive in a murder case. So Sherlock, did Oswald kill Tippett then?
Joe rogan brought me here
"cia killed jfk"
What is your best piece of evidence that proves this claim?
Well I'm not saying it's true but if i were paid to do so my argument would be this. A plot to kill the president would be an operation to be carried out with the utmost discretion, especially if it was an inside job. Where some people involved may not even now they're involved, a compartmentalization of tasks where some won't know what is the ultimate goal. Which as I'm given to understand is how some of the top operations go about where those that participate have only one job and one job only. Anyway, it could have been hidden into the plans for the Dallas motorcade almost invisible the space between vehicles, agents, and the placement of the president himself. The threat level could have been altered to lower defenses, and another shooter hidden somewhere not seen in one of the buildings around Houston and elm maybe using a type of ballistics that's more difficult to ascertain especially for civilian doctors. Sound can echo through a location like that to where an eye witness could be convinced they're mistaken that they heard two gunmen. Well that's my rough draft, again I don't buy into it.
Motive, means, opportunity. Oswald had only one of those for sure.
A mobster assasinated the 'killer' a day later
Oswald was the perfect patsy you tit
Foreign policy wise who benefitted the most? 1SR43L
This dude was so compromised… he’s become a joke regarding any subject.
Your ad hom is what's the joke.
The wounds to JFK's upper right back and the back of his head are both entry wounds. Not exit wounds. Therefore, both shots were fired from behind Kennedy. Not from the front of Kennedy.
not what the parkland doctors saw or testified too and these were trauma doctors who saw gunshot wounds routinely hundreds of times a year. some of them come across as quite hostile during their WR testimony
There's a good way to tell when this man is lying -- his lips are moving.
Damn... I heard David Brent say that 10 minutes ago. Thats friggin weird.
Ridiculous. He spent 20 years doing research, writing in longhand, devoting his life to trying to convince people of something he believed to be false? Have some common sense.
@@IrishCarney There is not one shred of evidence Oswald killed JFK. A few witnesses saw someone who looked like him in the 6th floor window of the School Book depository. That proves what?! Other's in the building looked like him including Lovegood who actually had more indicating he was involved than Oswald. And they found a gun traceable to Oswald. Which is a bit too obvious to any real detective. It was clearly a setup. Where's the evidence he killed Tippet? None! Zero! Why was he in a theater owned by Howard Hughes a meeting place of spies? Why were micro dots found on Oswald? He was clearly involved in some type of spy agency. The media was telling us Oswald was a lone gun man two hours after the fact. You can't even interview all the witness and collect all the evidence in two hours! So there is no real evidence Oswald killed Kennedy. HOW IN HELL! can you prove he was a lone gunman???
@@petergrandahl2386 preach!!!! Preach preach!!! Love what you're saying
"Don't believe those who trying hard to convince you of their cause".
I am a Vince Bugliosi of sorts, and the physical evidence in this case speaks for itself . . . . far more than any mere theory.
Tammy, there is far more evidence that JFK was killed by his Vice President Johnson in Johnson's political home, Texas, so he could become the next President than Oswald did in front of Oswalds work place.
vince was a mentally unstable person whos book is less than compelling , not sure you would want to align yourself with someone who due to his own misconduct was unable to ever seek higher office.
What makes you a 'Bugliosi' of sorts? Are you a former District Attorney? Did you write a best selling true crime book? Did you beat your mistress until she agreed to an abortion? Did you stalk a family over a bizarre inclination that the milkman got your wife pregnant?
@@FredPena-rd5cf kinda easy to see why vince couldnt get elected anywhere when the truth came out
@@simonjames1604 yeah and look at these sheep like BlueWolfe38, ' ...im a Bugliosi too..coooze...'. Smh. Who writes their scripted dialogue?
"Im just a patsy" ........come on vince.
Because I've lived in the Soviet Uniion come on
Did you expect him to admit that he was guilty?
Patsy's fint have 53 piece if evidence against them.Lol I know you're being sarcastic.
@@randyharris3175 Tell those 53 piece of evidence idiot. You don't even know those 53 "evidence"
@@gytisgytis5547 Why aren't you being censored when you call me idiot.But let me say it that smack me with a quote do you really well I guess they go by your intellect they can tell yours by the content of your texts.I know all those 53 pieces of evidence for your info The people who believe Oswald didnt kill Kennedy is intellectually impaired or cashing in as a profiteer in my learned opinion which category do you fall in? The former I presume.
Can't explain the Zapruder film that shows the head jerking back violently to the left. Can't explain why there were 2 guns on the 6th floor and only 2 hulls, (until the wound in the back was found, and then suddenly in walks the Magic Bullet) Sorry Counsler, you got this way wrong. This was an obvious Conspiracy, starting before the parade, when the press car was moved to the back of the parade.
you say i reject ,well what i reject is the word of a man (bugliosi) who has shown he has no problem with decieving people ,numerous times ive shown how bugliosi offers his opinion as fact ,how he distorts /twists ,omits and what i consider blatant lies . his ghost writer myers has also shown he has no problem decieving people . my friend you use the word flawed like bugliosi simply made a few mistakes , but if one distorts omits and lies thats intentional so cant be a simple mistake .
@finnemccool By the way did you see the 3 Zapruder films, do you confirm that JFK was pushed against the seat with the throat shot right after the sign, you never mentioned, what is your opinion YES or NO, You just passed by this one with no comments. Please do not mention any other JFK facts, there are millions, just this one YES or NO. As you said, your thing is to look the physics of the situation.
CONCENTRATION IS KEY !!!
No one else left TSBD but Oz. He just had to pick that time to run away & leave his jacket behind then go to rooming house to get pistol. Then he just happens to decide to go to movie theater after walking off from job while everyone else discusses what happened. Witnesses say he shot Tippit. Bullets matched his pistol.
@JohnNiemsMusic yeah, I believe Vince. I think it would be safe to say that all rational people would believe him once they reviewed his case. And it's realy not necessary to use capitals. It doesn't make your, uh "case" any more persuasive or logical.
America is told that Oswald killed Kennedy because he was a Marxist but everyone forgets that Kennedy was also a Marxist. Does this make any sense?
He's wrong! "No information has leaked out, none". Bugliosi doesn't know my father.
He said no CREDIBLE evidence has leaked out (in other interviews) though I don't think he used the word 'credible' here.
i have a friend of a friend of an uncle of a cousin that is sister of brother and cousin in second degree of my paternal grandmother that knew a guy that was neighbour of the neighbour of lee oswald and knows who killed kennedy
oswald was a patsy - what makes him even think Oswald fired ANY shots ???
Enough said...
STOP saying people can find the complete video on the FORA youtube channel. It is NOT THERE!
James "The Amazing" Randi is the champion of reason, logic, and science, which he applies mercilessly to "psychics," UFOlogy(also spelled ufoology) and conspir-idiocy theories. He recommended Vince's book.
@renduke Why don't you joi jbrumundsmith & Theshel10 to answer the 6 videos below. Thanks
wow this has been a 2 man thread for about a month....someone needs a life
And STOP censoring my comment that your complete version of this video is on you channel!
@renduke But he also repeatedly told all who would listen that he and he alone carried out the murder and specifically denied that anyone else was involved. Which makes sense as his killing of LHO bore none of the hallmarks of a mob hit. Further, if Oswald had not asked to change his shirt, Ruby, sending a money order around the corner, would not have been there to shot Oswald.
“Chaos” by Tom O’Neill buried this guy’s reputation for good. It’s comical but rather Sad looking at 10 year old comments on here from people duped by this professional liar and Government stooge. Not only is “Reclaiming History” worthless, but “Helter Skelter” is also methodically exposed. Bugliosi was a real piece of work. Not a good guy at all. I genuinely feel sorry for people who actually took the time to read that pile of junk.
Watching the Zapruder film, Connelly is hit a good 2-3 seconds after Kennedy is hit in the throat, thereby disproving the magic bullet theory. Connelly himself said that the bullet that hit him could not have been the same bullet that hit Kennedy. No wonder the government didn't want anybody to see the film. Oswald was seen having lunch in the lunch room on the first floor 10 minutes prior to the assassination. He was then seen with a coke in his hand in front of the coke machine on the second floor no more than 90 seconds after the shooting. Oswald was not a good shot, he was a bad shot. His second and last marksman test was only one point above the minimum required to remain in the marines. I could go on and on.
Bugliosi is correct when he says that neither the CIA nor anyone else in their right mind would have recruited Oswald for an assassination attempt like this. The real question is why are Bugliosi, Posner, and a few others taking this ridiculous stand that Oswald alone murdered President Kennedy? I can only imagine that they were recruited by the government/CIA to make this argument, publicly. Apparently, they were convinced by some national security argument and or paid handsomely to defend the government of this coverup. No government official would be able to make this point without opening a Pandora's Box of immense proportions. Only some very smooth talking, independent, professional debaters would take on such a challenge.
If you spend some serious time looking into the assassination of JFK, you will come to realize that the Warren Report is completely bogus, just like its defenders.
Obviously conspiracy kooks only viewed this video
atheismyes I suspect that you would not be so crudely insulting if you actually viewed the videos you attack.
I stated exactly what you did, that while most American communists kept a low profile, Oswald flaunted his communism, telling everyone he was a communist - even in the marine corps.
And he practically begged his brother to tell the newspapers that he was a commie.
Meanwhile, the KGB discovered that he had zero interest in communism - never read on the subject or went to the meetings.
when they analyzed photographs of the grassy knoll - they discovered what look like Obama's birth certificate
Right.....lone gunman and George Bush doesn't know where he was that day.....got it
Treating Randi like a religious figure is only about the most ironic thing one can do. The Church of James Randi--who'd have thunk it?
BTW, Everyone close to Kennedy insisted he would NEVER have sent ground troops into Vietnam. Period. As a Pacific War veteran, he had a tremendous amount of respect for MacArthur. MacArthur told him that getting into a ground war in Asia was as much as suicide. He took it to the bank.
Did he say “Jury in London” ?? Lol. He’s off the cuffing this. He doesn’t believe it. Funny.
You do know he's talking about the mock trial in London from 1986, right?
Yes the trial took place in London but was a Dallas jury.
@@randyharris3175 and a Dallas judge.
You gotta admit, if the mob, the CIA, the KGB, or some such wanted Kennedy dead, Oswald would be a very unliely candidate for the trigger man.
Michael Corleone: "Let somebody plant a weapon, and I'll kill them [Solozzo and McClusky] both."
Sonny Corleone: "No, let's send in Lee Oswald, we can rely on him."
I don't think so.
Here's a quote from : "ALL pathologists who examined the evidence in this case for four national commissions (seventeen pathologists for the head wound, fifteen for the back wound) reached the same conclusion: that the two wounds to the back side of the president’s body (i.e. the upper back and back of the head) were entrance, not exit wounds, and that both exited toward the front of the body. This group of pathologists includes the leading forensic pathologist for the conspiracy community, Dr. Cyril Wecht.”
Any conspiracy theory that contradicts this reality is dead in the water!
That's absurd. read Vincent Palamara's JFK From Parkland To Bethesda and literally every witness who saw the body at both hopsitals...and that's a helluva lot say at least one major thing that destroys the Warren Commission.
@@vernpascal1531 Presumably "literally every witness" does not include Humes, Boswell, and Finck - who actually performed the autopsy - or Dr. Rose, who would have done the autopsy if it had taken place in Dallas. Rose agreed with the autopsy findings, as did the Parkland doctors who were given a chance to examine the autopsy photos several years after the assassination. Note that NONE of the people who treated JFK in Parkland were experienced doctors or qualified pathologists (some of them were still residents) because the senior medical staff was attending a conference that day. They were preoccupied with trying to resuscitate the president and did not make accurate observations about the wounds he'd suffered. Kennedy's personal physician Admiral Burkley (Bethesda) and Theron Ward (Dallas) each signed death certificates giving the cause of death as a gunshot wound to the back of the president's head. These findings have never been disputed by the Kennedy family. The documentary "Cold Case JFK" includes an examination of the original autopsy photographs by an expert panel who demonstrate that the fracturing of the skull plates is perfectly consistent with a bullet strike to the back of the head. Palamara was a Secret Service agent - not a medical expert. Obviously, you're not either!
If one dispassionately examines the evidence against LHO, one realizes he was so clearly guilty that it is no surprise the Dallas police and the FBI knew they had their man that evening. The WC investigated LHO and found that his associations, his income and his beliefs were all consistent with he being a lone assassin.
It's a fair critique to note the WC didn't follow up on a lot of leads, but they did far more investigating than the critics seem to ever want to acknowledge.
The evidence overwhelmingly supports multiple shooters and a cover up.
Read your history. JFK was 1st Prez to send combat troops to Nam in '61. Ellsberg's PENTAGON PAPERS showed JFK expected military victory at end of '65. He didn't invade Cuba cuz it would've riled LatinAmerica. In Saigon he had friendly govt. He sent LBJ there to ask Diem to ask JFK for troops.
James Randi is the champion of reason. He saved a lot of us kids from falling for conspiracy nonsense, psychics, UFOs, etc. Too bad he wasn't around when you were my age. Otherwise, you wouldn't have turned out the way you did! As the French say, vive le Randi!
@elschanny @elschanny You could not be more wrong. There is not only evidence, but overwhelming evidence that this crime could not have been carried out by a solitary assassin.
watch?v=gkAc76n8q44
Oswald was never tried in a court of law with proper legal representation and full disclosure of all physical evidence. He was never allowed to produce expert witnesses to dispute any physical evidence or to crossexamine eye or character witnesses.
He was never tried or convicted so legally until this day he is "innocent until proven guilty".
All Oz needed was 1 juror in 12 for reasonable doubt. A good lawyer would have had him home in time for Christmas dinner.
Then how come Ruby didn't shoot Oswald the first time he had a chance to? You know, the night of the assassination? How could Ruby know that Oswald wouldn't be taken away and locked up in Alcatraz for his own protection?
Answer: He would have silenced Oswald immediately, the first time he had a chance. He wouldn't have waited two days, wired $25 to a stripper at the Western Union office, then strolled into the basement less than thirty seconds before Oswald appeared. Logic always wins.
That is totally correct!...Ruby was known to act on impulse.....and so he did!
He soured on USSR but NOT Marxism since he still called himself one. He tried to provoke anti-Castro groups into hitting him so he could use it to impress Havana into letting him in country. Oswald also tried to go back to USSR. Randi rules!
As I told others: Read his book. It is probably the best researched, most well documented piece of literature I've ever come across.
If you, like I, don't have time to read the book, get the audio book. It takes ~18 hours to get through this way, but it's worth it.
And why would Oswald leave the murder weapon behind? That makes no sense. No killer ever truly wants to be caught.
This character is dull. World peace is at stake, the no 1 suspect (Oswald) is caught, the entire world is breathless expecting him to talk and Ruby guns him down. If that's no conspiracy then what is ? Oswald met with his deat sure enough.
James Randi is champion of reason, logic, and science. He supports Bugliosi.
Vincent is a good man, but all i have to say is "back and to the left.?"
Oswald was job hunting three days before assassination. This proves he wasn't part of conspiracy. Why? if he was, he'd be reading travel brochures, not want ads for another job packing crates. Randi rules!
@renduke Four shots is not a fact. Not even close. There is absolutely zero evidence of four shots. There were three shots for sure. No evidence of a fourth, except for a minor percentage of witnesses who claim to have heard four shots. And that is a MINOR percentage of witnesses.
When interrogated, Oswald was caught in one lie after another; based on that alone, the Dallas PD knew he did it. And why in Hell did he immediately bail from the depository? Why did he shoot JD Tippit? Why did he hide in the theater and pull a gun on arresting officers?
Oswald had 53 pieces of evidence linking him to the crime. My God man, at least read the book.
there are thousands of pieces of evidence for multiple shooters.
@@TheJpep2424 No there are not. Only motive. Motive doesn’t prove anything.
If Oz was innocent, how could he know someone was trying to frame him, or even if shots came from TSBD? You're contradicting yourself. Day before killing, Oz gave his life savings to wife & left wedding ring behind. This proves he believed he was gonna die. When he saw no one suspected him at TSBD, which DISPROVES your theory he knew he was being framed, he left work, went home to get pistol. If someone was framing him, they would've arrestd him right at TSBD instead of letting him run away.
WC invited 3 extremely sharp shooter to duplicate Oswald supposed shooting, none of them could make it. What else do people need to know, only if LHO just hit a shot and missed the second shot. THAT'S ALL. Case Closed - Conspiracy.
Gosh darn those flat earth people arguing over one shot, one kill.
VB only exposes his ridiculous credulity if that is not meant to hide his complicity in the cover-up.
Except the throat wound and Oswald being downstairs when the shots were fired. Vincent got a big pay day for this drivel.
This is a pack of lies. Bugliosi was brilliant with Manson and his Monday morning quarterbacking of the OJ case, but he is spouting pure drivel on this subject.
Ivdid, Why some people are so impressed when a criminal says "I'm not guilty!"? The Dallas police station was LOADED with Federal Agents right after the shooting. Do you think thet would let Oswald be paraded back and forth in front of the cameras? They must have REALLY been holding their breath for that midnight press conference starring THEIR BOY! And really, ANY defector, ESPECIALLY from the USA going to the U.S.S.R. in 1959 would be under such a KGB microscope, the idea of spying is a joke.