This video is astounding by the way. Funny enough, I did a social studies project in the sixth grade about the JFK assassination, complete with a styrofoam recreation of Dealey Plaza, so it's wild to see this level of detail and research, down to the accurate 3D models. Well put-together and fascinating.
I was gonna comment the same thing. It sets the mood so well. Like a dark sudden confusion Edit: now I'm shaking a little cause bimmy vinesauce himself might've seen my silly reply about the partially eaten chicken wing on another comment 😅😂
Only when they have something to cover up. When several people directly witness the same thing few details dont line up, for example the perps shoe color.
I like how we see the gut instinct of Marina Oswald at work. She was surprised by Lee's early return home, his lack of talk about the president's visit. So while she didn't believe he was planning any assassination attempt, her realising some shot the president from her husband's place of work, her first instinct was to check the placement of his gun, even if she didn't do it completely.
@limerence8365 great post ! Just as a side note or 2 concerning LHO's apparent total lack of interest in John F. Kennedy coming to Dallas. When living in Minsk during 1961-1962 Oswald was VERY aware and interested in Kennedy and his politics and in particular his relationship with Khrushchev and Russia. Marina and most all the Oswalds' friends there stated that emphatically. Also in the summer of 1962 Paul Gregory used to visit the Oswalds often in Ft. Worth --- he was entering college later that year and was taking conversational Russian lessons from Marina. Gregory stated nearly every time he was at the Oswalds there was the same copy of Time Magazine's Man of the Year on the living room coffee table, from January 5, 1962. You can imagine who that Man was -- John F. Kennedy.
@@DanC-go9lc YT's Sean Munger (PhD/historian/author/teacher) has a very compelling 2-part video into the Kennedy assassination. Aug. 2022 "Oswald Acted Alone - JFK Assassination Solved." Even if anyone believes Oswald didn't act alone, they really owe it to themselves to watch this well-researched video.
@@isabellindlind Thanks and yes I have seen Munger's 2-part video and even though I don't think Munger has actually "solved" anything - he does have a fine video presenting the known facts and evidence. Priscilla Johnson McMillan's "Marina and Lee" is the most in-depth thing I have ever seen or read about Oswald's real life. It is so well-done that many are convinced McMillan must have been a CIA plant. Good day !
She recanted that testimony later saying the police made her say those things by pressuring her. Also that was a translation because her English at the time was to poor to understand what was being asked.
Man, shoutout to the voice actors. It's nothing that seems super exciting but just the fact that this video takes the extra step on the details goes to show how high-quality the production is.
This whole thing seems like an excellent case study into why eye witness testimony is not weighed as heavily anymore in court. People misremember, wrongly perceive, or unintentionally imagine things without realizing it all the time.
Also the desire to want to help, to want to sound aware of their surroundings, and the notoriety of being at the scene of the event, could easily influence improper memories or statements. Even more subtle is the way that subconscious consensus, due to publicized information, can influence your perception. If those same witnesses had all been immediately isolated minutes after the shooting, and never told anything and never allowed to read or watch anything leading up to the interview, and then asked about everything they saw that day, there’d be no inherent focus on scrutinizing the actions and whereabouts of Oswald, other than the leading and incessant questions by the cops regarding Oswald. If cops too were to have no prior suspicions (so ideally an uninformed interrogator), then you’d actually see an interrogation cobble together a pure and unbiased timeline of events (flawed as they may still be, due to the frailties of memory).
This is why I don’t believe a single one of the eye witnesses that swear they heard multiple explosions before the towers fell I’m not saying other parts of the conspiracy are false but whenever a 9/11 truther brings up the eye witnesses saying they heard bombs, I just laugh. Bc that literally could be anything. You had bodies slamming into the ground at terminal velocity and all the other sounds. A civilian can’t even tell the different between a firework and a gunshot and you’re telling me they can tell the different between a bomb going off and something out in the high stress and chaotic environment of 9/11? No way in hell
If you’ve ever tried looking at a building’s windows or tried locating whether the noise you hear in your flat is coming from above, below or next door, you know that none of the witness accounts mean much. It’s just too hard to tell such things, especially when you’re not expecting something to happen.
Absolutely. The last apartment I lived at was like a giant echo chamber. I was convinced, on multiple occasions, that people were climbing the fire escape outside my bedroom window. Every time it turned out to be coming from the street, often across the street.
Yeah, the first time I opened all the windows in an apartment I'd spend the weekend in had a noise coming out of the painting but only when I laid down. The noise would come from everywhere in any other part of the room. Turns out I forgot about the fountain outside and never experienced this cause I had never opened the windows.
the worst thing is that noone anticipated this event and the noises assiciated with it. i bet directional estimates would be 10x better if people knew "there will be gunsounds in the next 5 minutes"
I especially don't trust the accounts of the people who were standing outside, describing what they saw inside the building, several stories up and often from quite the distance. I'm sure you could easily tell if a person stands in a window from across the street, but the people describing facial features, height, even machine guns and such...Yeah, not buying it.
This is perhaps the only channel on youtube where I actually do not mind waiting almost two years for a single video. The quality of Lemmino's content is second to none.
How’s he gonna make a video of one small aspect of the case then at the end essentially rules out a conspiracy completely? There’s a doc on abc7 news on TH-cam by Josiah Thompson that’s more comprehensive mainly focusing on the physical evidence and not just unreliable contradicting witness testimonies
@@Seagull_House saw some comments on his last video from his patreons telling that he was close to fishing the video. So I didn’t worry much and i figured it would be uploaded whrn he hit 5mil as hes done a milestone video for every millionth subscriber
Reply to *AMC2283* (because he keeps reporting my reply) You're the one who decided to question my original comment and as is typical of you fantasists, you cannot answer a basic question. That's not smart that's dumb. If you are so smart, how come you have never been able to prove your case? Clearly, this subject matter is way over your head. Presenting evidence is like in the Court room. Two sides bring their evidence and suppositions and they leave it to the jury to decide the verdict. Nobody's saying that the Warren Commission was perfect or even that it answered all of the questions. But sane people realise that all investigations are like that. Based on the evidence presented over 61 years since that day in November 1963, nobody has been able to bring a single shred of evidence that anyone other than Oswald was involved. But you're trying to claim that he was the innocent patsy all along, but as yet you have not been able to provide one single iota of proof. You refuse to be objective on the subject but choose to follow your own petty prejudice and paranoia. So come on, if you're so smart answer these questions. Frazier and Randle testified that Oswald had a long package with him that morning. If they were lying about the package to frame Oswald, why? If the police officers forged a paper bag to explain how Oswald brought the rifle into the building unseen, wouldn't they have taken the time to photograph it where they were going to claim it was discovered on the sixth floor? How could they have known so early in the investigation that no one had seen Oswald with a rifle so that they would need something to cover the rifle and properly frame Oswald? How did they know to add fibers from a blanket? How did they know in which blanket Oswald had kept the rifle or even that he had kept the rifle in a blanket? If they did plant the fibers, why not plant enough to make the evidence conclusive? More importantly, how would they have known that Randle and Frazier were going to say they saw Oswald with a bag? They had not talked to either one yet. They were both friends with Oswald, so what motivation would they have to lie and frame him? If Oswald did want curtain rods for his room, why did he have to go home on a Thursday to get them when he could have easily have gotten them over the weekend? Where did he get the curtain rods? Where did the curtain rods go? Why did Oswald need curtain rods if there were curtain rods already up? Why did Oswald deny to the cops that he had a long bag, and insist that he brought only a sandwich to work? How did Oswald's fingerprint and palmprint get on the bag? Where did the rifle in the Paine garage go, if it was not the Mannlicher-Carcano found on the sixth floor of the Depository? How did a rifle matching Oswald's appear in the Depository if it was not brought there by him? If he didn't take the rifle, why did Oswald, for the first time during his entire marriage, leave his wedding ring at home (1H73)? OSWALD DID IT, CASE CLOSED
The thing about Oswald is that he was seemingly the real example of someone who no one notices. He was such a loner to all of his coworkers and no one noticed him until afterwards, when he was said to be the assassin, that his coworkers started looking for him in their memories.
That's a great point. People who become notable or infamous for some reason after being anonymous...it's amazing how folks will elevate themselves in their proxy to that person. I saw it first hand living in San Bernardino to the shooters in the 2015 massacre here. Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik in reality were a couple of radicalized loners living in the adjacent city of Redlands. But suddenly, all these folks had these interactions with them that didn't line up with reality.
@@keyboardwarrior7538Isn't it a little odd that Bonnie Williams was eating chicken alone near where the shot was taken then there were remains of that same meal in the snipers nest, where some witnesses saw an African American shooter?
21:06 The “reoccurring dreams” part is a fantastically eerie addition. The way the interviewer is taken aback by such an odd and personal question…it doesn’t necessarily add much to the case, but it goes a long way to show the impact this event had on the people who witnessed it
i like your interpretation of it. i thought the kid was making fun of the interviewer for implying he should've told someone about the ostensibly innocuous thing he'd experienced
It's so striking because it comes deep in the midst of a swamp of names, positions, logistics and timestamps. After being deluged with facts and put in a firmly analytical frame of mind we're suddenly reminded that this was a deeply traumatic event, both for the nation and the witnesses. It elevates the assassination from a piece of political history to something out of modern myth. It's like something out of Twin Peaks
The guy was said to be a pathological liar. I don't doubt he felt partly responsible for not calling attention to the window rifle, but I'm pretty sure the dream part was some of that fancy imagination of his. "Man, if this were a picture, the hero would be having dreams of the event every night" or something. That's at least my take on this.
Just like the video states, it's hard not to be impacted by watching the President of the United States be killed with a headshot right in front of you in the middle of the Cold War.
This is one of the best produced docs if ever watched. From the graphics to the voiceover to the creepy music, it's just well done. I wish you had a lot more of these to watch, even more on this story. Excellent execution!
How is this free? This dude goes dark for over a year and then comes back with a full length documentary of insane quality. This is really one of the best channels on TH-cam.
I cannot imagine the amount of documents and records someone had to go through for this video. It might be the most impressive documentary I've ever seen.
Check out "the smoking gun" about an Australian detective who surmised that a secret agent in the car behind the president accidentally shot Kennedy with a franigble bullet (designed to explode on contact like the Zapruder footage clearly shows
Pretty solid stuff. Idk if anyone else was thrown off by the English but its kind of cool in an unsettling way. I know that its propper English, Most of them speak very well but we just don't answer questions and form sentences like that anymore. 60 years ago seems like such a short time in the past but feels so far away.
I sure learned a lot more than I did at first . The guyg he rode with said the sack the gun was in wasn't quite that long it's confusing but he was involved some how lee Oswald
It would be incredible if you covered the Zodiac investigation. Not the murders, but the press and police investigation because there are some extremely wild things in there.
Always wanted to see this after the Jack the Ripper episode. Wasn't sure it Lemmino would ever do more true crime related videos. But with DB Cooper and Jack the Ripper it leaves the door open a bit. I like the very grounded and factual look at the cases and the new animations have been top notch.
I like on how Lemmino went from being a typical Top 10 TH-cam channel, to literally producing both music and free Netflix tier high quality crime documentaries on TH-cam. You're a legend bro.
Netflix documentaries are usually a bloated mess stuffed with red herrings and pointless filler content just so they can take a topic and stretch it out into multiple episodes to bolster their “viewing time” metrics. Lemmino’s stuff is much more to-the-point and “all killer, no filler.” Just compare the way DB Cooper was covered between the 2. This channel’s version was infinitely more engaging, IMO.
A bit like the Simon Whistler transition. He started with a top 10 channel as well, and has now an expanded universe of channels with all kinds of topics.
My uncle was a homicide detective. Once, he told me about a case he worked that really frustrated him. Two guys had shot each other at a house party. One of them died while the other was badly injured, but lived. There was literally dozens of witnesses to it (they'd apparently got in quite a screaming match first, drawing everyone's attention). He interviewed all of them to find out what exactly happened (depending on how the confrontation went, the guy who lived could be brought to trial for murder or get a lower charge if it was in self defense). Everybody remembered it differently, even when he eliminated the testimony of the victim's friends and those that were too intoxicated to really be trustworthy. There were five people there that hadn't drank or smoked anything, didn't know the guys, and were close enough that they heard/saw the entire argument. They each had a different memory of how it happened. Not even a little different. Vastly different. When told about the other people's recollections, none of them changed their story. They were all confidant that it happened exactly how they remembered it. Human recollection is incredibly finicky and unreliable, especially in stressful moments. It's why so many prisoners were exonerated when DNA began being used. We;re just not designed to perfectly pay attention to every detail, we're lucky if we even remember the broad strokes. Even worse, when pressured to remember more, sometimes our brains will fabricate details that are completely wrong. We should all feel blessed to live in a society where we can pull out our phones and have perfect documentation of how things happen. We think police brutality is bad now, imagine what it used to be like when they had literally no oversight and everybody was taught to trust their word over anyone else's. Terrifying! Edit: Answering some questions. I sadly don't know how the case was concluded. I was told this back in the early 2000s, not sure exactly when (I was fairly young) and my uncle has since passed away so I can't ask him. It was in California though if anyone wants to try and track it down themselves. Also I didn't mean to come across as police being bad there at the end. I'm more of the opinion that there are a few really bad apples that ruin the bunch. The thing is, now we actually have methods to catch those bad apples, while before video cameras became prevalent it was always the accused criminals word against the police officers. Pretty much everyone would believe the cop before some random person, which they should since most criminals lie about their crimes (DUH). The idea of there being corrupt or even criminal police wasn't really a common thought until more recent times (among the majority of the population at least). I could be wrong about that, but when I talk with my parents and grandparents, the current anti police mentality of the younger generation is very foreign to them. P.S. i'm not a robot writing this, LOL. I know you're only supposed to use one space between sentences in academic papers, but I always found it easier to read when there was multiple. Sorry if it annoys the more academically inclined.
I was thinking that when the first discrepancy showed up, where one man said Oswald had a package in his hands and the other man said he did not. My job is some form of a doorman, and I wouldn't be able to tell you if the person that entered two minutes ago was wearing shorts or pants. It's impossible to be that certain about minor details regarding people you don't care about
This shows why eye witness testimony is actually fairly useless yet people get sent to prison on similar testimony all the time. We are all fairly useless at noticing at what is going on around us
and yet the video relies on testimony to put Lee Oswald at the 6th floor half an hour before the shooting, carrying a long and thin bag into the building, being at the 2nd floor after 1-2 minutes of shooting, the shot came from the book depository etc. These are all based on testimony as well.
@@ru40342 Nobody seems to ever ask, if he wasn't the shooter, why did he shoot a police officer and try to go on the run by sneaking into a cinema after the president was shot from his place of work?
Great video! As someone that’s been interested in the Kennedy assassination for years, seeing a video like this just makes my night. The music, presentation, everything is so well done. Great job!
Something I absolutely love, that you also did an exceptional job with in the Jack the Ripper video, is your use of visuals to build maps and timelines to give context that's easy to follow.
my dumbass is so bad at following timelines and stuff, its a genuine accessibility feature to disabled nerds and im so glad its becoming more popular. i love bobbybroccoli's videos for the same reason. ive seen some people call it the 'jon bois' style but idk if that refers more to the manipulation of google maps than anything
@@brittanybeauvais right?? its so perfectly explained, ive rewatched it several times!! Along with that JCS casey anthony video. I know the stories but just goes to show the power of a good storyteller. I'll be rewatching this one again too I can already tell!
Animating this whole building + roads around it, being able show the different floors as well as the people and boxes in there... the voice actors... the clean chapter design... all these little details. You're crazy for putting this high quality content out here for free. Thanks man, you're awesome!
@@foximacentauri7891 try re-listening to a pair of dialogue with the same lines. The repeating “yes, sirs” or “no, sirs” are good examples. If you compared them, they sound exactly the same! From pitch to tone and inflections. In a lot of lines, you can hear common AI generated artifacts, such as: voices that sounds “staticy” and peaks often. Just re-listen, i’m 99% certain it’s AI
The fact Lemmino makes everything from the graphics to the music is some serious dedication to his craft, I hope to become as skilled as such in the future, amazing video right here
The whole paper bag thing is hilarious, imagine asking workers whose job is to handle paper wrapped packages all day to remember the dimensions of one specific package that wasn't even part of their job.
Now, I don't know the entire line of products kept in the depository. If the place handled only books though, I'd say the paper bag was of a very odd shape for any practical use for books.
I'm so glad you talked about the echo because it's one of the things that seems to get inexplicably overlooked so often. A good example of this phenomenon was during the Mandelay Bay shooting where you can hear in bodycam footage and 911 calls that there was a lot of uncertainty about the number and location of shooters due to the echo from the buildings, and the police were having a hard time pinpointing his location.
@@wilekrowan3610 I find the arguments around Mandalay Bay pretty unconvincing tbh, although I'll admit I don't know as much about them as the JFK conspiracies. Afaik the main mystery is the motive but that goes doubly so for some kind of cover-up. The idea that a government body enlisted dozens or hundreds of people to help stage a shooting and then successfully cover up the true nature of the shooting while also faking a large amount of evidence seems like an unreasonable amount of effort to put into a scheme supposedly designed to push for gun control, especially since there have obviously been many other mass shootings previously that resulted in no change to legislature. To me it seems ridiculous to suggest a large number of people were involved in a plot to kill dozens of people with the end goal to be to push for banning bump stocks. The government would be risking a huge amount if any part of the scheme were to be found out, for example if one of the hundreds of people on the ground happened to record any of the other shooters, for very little gain. Like I said though, I'm not well informed about Mandalay Bay conspiracies so if you have any decent evidence feel free to enlighten me
My guy went from making top 10 videos to being one of the very best documentary channels on the entire internet. Absolutely outstanding video man, you're a damn legend. Seeing you grow as a creator has been my great pleasure. Keep up the fantastic work, and thank you for the entertainment.
@@ok-nz7mt Have you actually watched the video? Or were you just waiting for him to confirm your favorite theory and therefore ended up disappointed that he didn't? Because he started and ended the video by addressing just that : there are countless theories and you can't reasonably cover them all, he made a choice and decided to stick to facts on one particular angle. It's up to you then to make up your mind. Him not agreeing with you doesn't mean he's biased.
So much of this can be explained by the fact that human memory sucks. For example, the sheer number of people who are falsely imprisoned due to incorrect witness testimony is actually frightening. The human memory is staggeringly unreliable and is prone to exaggeration and falsification, not to mention susceptible to suggestion.
Human memory is also one of the foundations for the most successful species which has occupied this planet over 4.6 billion years. And not all memory is judged equal. At one end of the spectrum you have people with severe conditions (such as dementia) which severely impact on the accuracy of memory. At the other end you have people who can memorize highly complex concepts instantaneously and be able to recount them - with perfect accuracy - forty years later.
@@ThiagoSilva-gb2iv Shock can lead to gaps in memory. But it's specific to the individual in question. If memory in such conditions is so poor then this undermines the argument that we can draw any conclusions about the testimonies of those interviewed following Dallas - either for Oswald or against him.
@@ThiagoSilva-gb2iv Shock and trauma leads to exaggerated stories or stories that have parts that are missing and our minds just make things up to fill those holes.
After a stressful event like a shooting, it's rare for people to give an accurate recounting of events. Some people who have fired in self defense remember firing 2 shots when they actually fired 10, things like that.
The investigation from congress stated that the Kennedy assassination was likely the result of conspiracy and even now, there are thousands of documents that the CIA refuses to release. This guy doesn’t know shit, he’s built a pretty time line but doesn’t have any deeper access than what is available online I love his videos but to dismiss the surrounding secrecy is ignorance to the point of absurdity
I mean isn't this a perfect demonstration why witness testimony should never be considered as direct evidence. It is one of the least reliable forms of evidence. You cannot rely on human memory even if they're not trying to fabricate a story. But my god what a masterclass by Lemmino. I've seen documentaries with actual budgets that don't even come close to this level.
I completely agree I just get upset when people disregard it cause it's not 100% accurate. I guess I think it shouldn't be primary evidence but secondary. Elizabeth Loftus the person who brought to light that memory isn't 100% reliable, literally goes to every court case she can go to, simply to say that cause eye witnesses testimony is not accurate 100% of the time it should be disregarded (she literally did this in the Ghilsaen Maxwell trial which i think is disgusting).
I love the 3d animations. That type of thing makes it SO easy to visualize the setting and scenario. Better editing than mainstream documentaries. Please do more like that, love it.
The editing truly has far more clarity than some documentaries I've seen on larger streaming platforms. I find it a shame when I hear people who don't watch many videos online automatically disregarding content posted on TH-cam. Some people I know, if I start a sentence with "I watched a TH-cam video about..." they automatically think low quality content, whereas if I saw "I watched a documentary about..." you can tell they're listening far more intently. Honestly, I've seen far worse (surface level, dramatized, sensational) documentaries coming out of Netflix or Disney+ than some of what's available on TH-cam. Once again, Lemmino absolutely knocks it out of the park.
@@randomcommenter7343 This is better than ANYTHING ever produced around the JFK assassination. We love in glorious times when the best talent are able to self fund themselves and produce pieces like this.
Can we just appreciate the amount of research and editing and the hours of finding the good music, the good 3d renders and all those photos, the masterclass of a story and the transitions between events and the easy visualisation, Honestly the Documentary is a work of art.
I agree , I've heard a lot of the testimony in this video , but never sequentially matched with the graphics of the building . It makes for great visualization and better understanding . I might be missing something , but Charles Givens eating his lunch on the 6th floor at the center window approx. 5 to ten minutes before the shooting and not noticing while someone lays silent a few feet from him in the the South East corner snipers nest seems unlikely . There are too many conflicting testimonies by witnesses on the street and those on the 6th floor at that critical moment .
yep sth about that sound really gets to me. i was scrolling through the comments to see if i was the only one. def a very effective sound then it would seem. nice work lemmino!
These videos are so bittersweet. So good, but a gentle reminder we will be waiting another year for him to drop a new masterpiece. Truly one of your best works.
Imagine the research involved in this? Voluminous in nature as well as piecing all that research to make sense to people! Very responsible and the outmost brilliant work!
It's nice to see something like this get lots of views. Counters all the knocked up in an afternoon stuff of someone playing a video game or their dog meeting a kitten for the first time and speaking " in bubbles" dog talk. Sadly my dog was shot during a visit to Dallas whilst whilst doing his business on a grassy knoll, so I cannot make money that way. :(
I decided to watch this during a very noisy flight, and I just wanted to say; your clear pronounciation, crisp consonants, good audio mixing, and subtitles/visual clues on every major point, made this easily watchable even when almost inaudible. Your production efforts do not go unappreciated.
I need more details. When you say noisy flight, are we talking screaming children or soviet built helicopter in Pakastan. This seems like it was a pretty extreme experience.
@@randomguy8228 I was sitting right over the engine, white noise was so bad you couldn't hear the next person talking to you, and even with earbuds on max volume it drowned out most of the sound. I kept my earbuds in as earplugs even when not watching anything to protect my hearing. Don't buy the cheapest tickets you can find.
In Oswald's defense(?), the number of times I have been at work, walked through or been in a room, had someone say "oh when did you get here" and dont believe that I have walked past them multiple times is amazing. some people are just really good at being ghosts.
It's literally a joke at my workplace that sometimes we don't see each other come in if there's customers around- just today a coworker of mine came in and was doing paperwork in the back room for half an hour before I went back there and noticed she'd arrived
I always get yelled at because i spook people. Growing up with cats, i tried to move silently to not dusturb them when they sleep and stuff. Apparently i accidentally became very good at sneaking and at this point i try to get people to notice me as to not spook them by batman appearing behind them.
He really could have been one of those coworkers where they didnt really pay much mind to him and he didn't pay much mind to them. I had an acquaintance that didnt even realize we were in the same class until halfway through the year. It can be surprisingly easy to become invisible to others.
I once was in a meeting with six other coworkers and as the meeting was about to begin, one of my coworkers asked if we shouldn't first wait for me to arrive before starting. He literally didn't notice that I was sitting directly across from him. So yeah, I have no question that somebody might not be able to recall the exact positioning of a bunch of chicken bones.
Man modeled the whole building, cut it, and kept showing the floors with meticulous detail, goes over it with amazing animation, and shows a documentary far more detailed than any documentary can do. This man cooked his video to perfection and the video tastes so good. I'd easily find myself watching it again.
It's a great video! It also shows something that the legal system is well aware, and that eyewitness testimony can be sketchy and sometimes unreliable. People remember things out of order, or convince themselves they saw something. If it is a famous case, they may fabricate things to make themselves a part of it.
@@ashishhembrom3905 No. LEMMiNO does all the animations and editing by himself. Why do you think these videos take so long to make? If you don't believe me skip to the credits at the very end. There's credits for Patreon supporters, voice actors, archival footage and audio, images, 3D assets, and music, but none for animation or editing.
Insane from seeing this channel go from Top 10 Memes , to a full blown production channel capable of making the most intriguing and comprehensive videos on the platform . Man it gives me chills seeing your come up to and receiving the flowers you deserve .
I was just thinking that. I’ve been subbed to this channel for a long ass time but I haven’t seen any videos for a long while till this got recommended. I don’t remember what video exactly I seen from him back then but it had to be video game related since I was maybe 14-15 at the time lol
The amount of frustration I feel because of all the contradicting evidence, eye witness accounts etc. is incredible! Thanks for making this amazing video, it really showcases how weird this case actually was!
Google Kennedy/Lincoln coincidence and it gets even weirder... Much, much weirder If you haven't heard about it already, it will change your life forever
Watched this after I saw people saying that it was wrong for bigger channels to steal views so decided to watch it on my own. Well worth the hour and a half and incredibly well put together
"bigger channels to steal views " ? this is hilarious to me. Only if someone were to literally repost someone else's work as their own could they be stealing views. lol
@@ivanschleppenbach6461 oh wow. yeah 2M subscribers is a lot. I assumed people wouldn't have many subscribers if they're just copy-pasting. To be fair, I came to this video and ended up subscribing thanks to VTH. He usually has something to say to add context to the videos he's reacting to.
@@Alec0124 bruh adding three bits of useless info then leaving the room for a piss is really adding context to the 12 months that lemmino put in to create this video 🤦♂
I've watched several professionally made for TV documentaries about the Kennedy Assassination, and none of them have been as good as this right here. No bias, no conspiracy chasing, no smoke, just the accounts of that moment. I love this. Please keep doing what you're doing.
I, too, have watched many of those documentaries. But, I have been a Kennedy assassination buff since the age of 18 years old. I became extremely more interested in this assassination after I read the book, "Best Evidence", by Wesley Liebeler (not sure if I spelled his last name right but the book title is correct). He was an investigator on the Warren Commission. There was also supposed to be a follow-up book but I never was able to find a second book. Over the years, though, I started to become a little bit suspicious about whether or not there was a second gunman. Whether he was in the grassy knoll or in a storm drain like Johnny Rosselli told Bill Bononno, it started to not make sense. I don't have any doubt that Oswald did fire shots at Kennedy. In any event, I watched a documentary called, "The Smoking Gun". It was done by a retired Australian Detective. After he completes his investigation into the whole affair, he also incorporates parts of an investigation that was being done by a Firearms expert in the late 60s. I had been aware of that investigation that that gentleman had started in the late sixties. As far as I'm concerned, after watching this documentary called, "The Smoking Gun", this case is closed! Anyone with an interest in this assassination needs to watch this documentary. Whether you agree with it or not is up to you. But, I will say this much, the shot that went into Kennedy's head was fired from a gun that uses frangible bullets. The mannlicher-carcano rifle that Oswald used, did not fire frangible bullets. That is evidenced in the fact of the, "pristine bullet" that was found on the stretcher in one piece. They were able to prove that that pristine bullet was fired from Oswald mannlicher-carcano rifle. A frangible bullet is one that breaks into small pieces the minute it hits its Target. The only weapons that day that fired frangible bullets were AR-15s. I understand that people have their whole life careers invested in this assassination who will not want to admit that that documentary I am talking about solves this case. A lot of people have been making money off of writing books and acting like they're trying to solve this controversial assassination. Consequently, they have every motive to tear apart something that actually is the final word on the Kennedy assassination. This case is closed! I'm sorry I don't have a link for that documentary but all you have to do is search TH-cam for "The Smoking Gun". I stopped short of saying who the documentary thinks was the shooter of frangible bullet because I think people would like to watch that video and find out what it says for themselves as they go through all the evidence that he presents.
@@BBeowulf Would that make you feel safe enough to remove the tin foil hat and step out of the echo chamber to join the general public? I feel like anyone who seriously thinks some of these outlandish, physics-defying, human nature defying conspiracy theories could actually be true needs a psychological evaluation. The reality is that you like a good conspiracy because it's exhilarating and juicy, often much more so than the truth, and will seek out a good conspiracy in anything. The vast majority of the time though, things are just what they are and nothing more, and attempts to dismiss overwhelming evidence to chase one lone outlier often just makes you look like a fool. The ability to put aside biases and recognize things for how they are is a big sign of maturity. Someone who dismisses everything because it doesn't make them feel good inside is very insecure and immature.
unironically it makes sense why amos euins said what he said. the sun was likely shining upon oswald’s head making the rest less visible and making it appear bald or something similar
Meh. This felt disappointing. LEM seems to have abided by the official narrative or simply did Wikipedia levels of research… prettt sad considering his platform he could’ve really brought people the truth It’s just more infotainment but it sure look pretty huh
he usually uploads once a year so it's not out of the blue. each documentary is extremely professional and he has to singlehandedly research it, edit it and compose music for it
When the Las Vegas shooter opened fire, police got calls to various other hotels in the Las Vegas area and reports were put over the radio of multiple shooters or a lone shooter in those buildings instead of Mandalay Bay. People who've never heard gunshots in their life are quick to underestimate how powerfully they can reflect off buildings
3 months ago today (May 15th 2024) the Slovakian Prime Minister, Robert Fico, was shot. The TV crews interviewed a first hand witness, a middle-aged woman called Lubica Valkova. She can be seen in the video of the shooting, no more than 5 yards away from the gunman as he fired his 5 shots. She was asked, "How many shots did you hear?". She immediately answered, "I heard 3 shots.". It's all on youtube. In general, people are not reliable witnesses, especially in traumatic situations.
This statement you've incorrectly made is in fact 100% terrible misinformation! I'll attempt to explain some basics which anyone who has never spent a day in a major Las Vegas Strip hotel can't possibly process or understand... As a person who spent so much time in Las Vegas for 20 years, and has walked and moved though these hotels thousands of times, I'll say this... In every single hotel where 'shots fired' were reported, I know for a fact you can't possibly hear gunshots from inside any of the others. So, for example... if gunshots were actually happening at Mandalay Bay you'd NEVER hear it almost 2 miles away while INSIDE of Planet Hollywood or Bellagio (these are where some of the other shootings were reported and the pl witnesses were specifically hearing the shots INSIDE those locations) - no matter how you slice it, you would not hear any shots if you were located INSIDE any of the other locations. To be fair I'll add it's barely but remotely possible with insanely specific exceptions for the places right next to one another under absolute perfect conditions. But these rare scenarios are not what was reported by people INSIDE these other hotels. Mandalay Bay is basically at the south end of the major Las Vega Strip. Luxor is just across the street yet guests at Luxor didn't even hear shots... But on the other hand Mandalay Bay is about 1.7 miles from Bellagio and Planet Hollywood, the latter two being basically just across the Strip from each other. Meaning across the LAS VEGAS STRIP. It doesn't matter, nobody would hear unless the shots were fired within fairly close proximity with respect to the enormous size of these places. Even then it wouldn't be clear because there's loud music outside at the Bellagio fountain, people walking around talking and crazy nonstop driving, police, ambulances going to pickup people who got too high or drunk and foot traffic on the Strip. INSIDE these massive casinos there's gambling machines, restaurants, shops, people screaming on the craps tables, live music and headliner shows of all kinds going in multiple rooms. All these major casinos also have Ballroom / Conference Areas where weddings, award ceremonies and parties are active with their own music and sound systems and these areas alone are HUGE in their own right, usually pretty isolated from Casino floor and hotel areas for privacy. Even Hotel and Casino areas are almost always set apart from another so hotel guests can rest without hearing all the action happening down on the casino floor. Mandalay Bay actually has two different hotels on the property and many outsiders are unaware. The other more upscale hotel is now called "W Las Vegas", but was formerly renamed "Delano" and "The Hotel" before that. So it's very important to factor in these things. So, I see this phony narrative is everywhere but it's complete nonsense, obviously assumptions made up by people who've likely never witnessed the magnitude of these mega-sized hotels. I even had friends in a band at Mandalay DURING THE SHOOTING and they heard NOTHING even though the shooter was upstairs in the hotel, they were near the casino floor. In reality, that's just how disconnected and distant everything is in these big hotels. My friends in the band were all grabbed by security and taken into a "safe room". They told me they had no idea anyone was shooting anything which makes total sense to anyone who's been in MB a few times. It's just not possible if you understand how huge and loud these casinos and hotels really are and how they're physical laid out. Sound science and physics don't work that way. The undeniable truth is the fact there were multiple shootings in all those hotels at the same time and it's all been covered up. They also found a bomb in a car parked at Luxor in the parking garage. Las Vegas Metro has that on record even though most people never even heard about it... If you don't know these things that's ok. But please stop creating these senseless narratives. People are still confused enough to this day. Answers from officials were never fully provided. One of the biggest cover ups of all time in my opinion. Random Reference for context: Ask yourself.... why did not one single Texas School Book Depository employee who was downstairs eating run up to the 6th floor to find JFK assassin's/ shooters? Maybe that's too obvious on another level but OK... then at least ask "why", when all the employees who were in the same building downstairs eating lunch were questioned they never even knew any shots were happening upstairs. They were listening to the radio and eating. The simple answer is the physics of sound aren't what people think. Now just imagine any modern major Las Vegas Strip Casino dwarfs that building dozens of times over. I hope this clarifies things a bit more for people to comprehend there were in fact simultaneous, multiple shootings and events that day... "WHY" has never been answered.
This video made me think how cool a detective game would be where you try to solve an old mystery based on unreliable eyewitness testimonies and you have to piece together the true story of what happened
The Kentucky Fried Movie has a parody about that exact game about this exact event. "You found a patsy! You have that patsy conveniently killed!" Oh wait, it wasn't about solving the murder, it was about running the conspiracy.
Yet, the companies producing the TV documentaries would categorize Lemmino, as one of those lone Conspiracy Theorist with no degree in a journalism, no peer review, and no editorial funding for his project. Crazy how they’ve been losing viewership, money, and public trust for the past decade and a half.
To be honest it's not hard to make things that are better than contemporary TV programming. As you said, all you need is a bit of talent, experience and know how, and some way to fund it. Moren TV is pretty poor in quality compared to what you can find from independent content creators or small teams of people on the internet nowadays.
you havent watched Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy theroy, about this. he is ex navy seal team leader, marksman, he tried to make the shots with the same gun. he failed greatly. HE explained its impossible to do this with one gunman.
This has to be one of the best TH-cam videos ever made. Long form and absolutely packed with content, references, top-tier visual effects, sources, and a level headed approach to conclusions. You guys have really knocked it out of the park with this one. Brilliant work to everybody involved.
it's about 1/8th of the total context surrounding the incident, so, take that for what it's worth. It's great, but could be expanded to 10 hours with still no conclusive answer
In the Zapruder film Kenney appearing after passing from behind a billboard is inclining his head forwards looking down, so he had been hit. Otherwise he would have kept looking at the public. Then suddenly his head is violently yanked backwards, hit from the front.
@dootie8285level headed is acknowledging probability of incidents and making conclusion based on what's known, not just making up stuff because it feels like it 'fits', a process that's completely ignored by most self-proclaimed 'researchers' and 'conspiracy theorists'
It's totally wrong mate, what you on about! The FBI killed JFK. It's written. We have the proof! Time to buckle up and realise your heads of state don't want you to have any freedom
Jack the Ripper is my "favourite" case - I'm saving his video on it until this weekend. One factor it has in common with JFK is the ambiguity of both witness statements and physical evidence.
Indeed. Just goes to show how dumbed down modern TV is.. This type of documentary was the norm about 20years ago.. Not now all fake reality, cooking, property, and mindless X factor/singing competitions. All worthy to their audience but I like to learn something.. And I did. The third shooter? most likely sound reflecting of the book suppository building.
While a lot of work was put into this, I think it’s much more “simpler” than a modern documentary, meaning it’s much more to the point and without distracting cuts, fades, interview splices and music. All the graphics are excellent and designed to help us understand, not impress us with its “incredible cutting edge CGI blah blah.” It’s simpler, meaning I can actually understand what’s going on. And that is SO much better in every respect.
I was a 10 year old kid on Nov 22, 1963 and the events of that day and those that immediately followed have stuck with me ever since. I have read every decent book (and some a bit far fetched), watched every documentary and movie, collected magazines and newspapers, etc. I must say this is one of the very best minute by minute accounts of that day I have ever seen. Your graphics are amazing and your in depth explanation is spot on. Thank you for pulling this together. I hope you do more on this subject.
I’m similar is the sense of 9/11. Similar age (13 years old) and consumed a lot of my life (dad deployed shortly after, then I joined infantry and also deployed). Suffice to say, it’s curious how world events can seriously influence one’s trajectory and life.
@@dkiller6060I remember how impressed I was when caller id happened! Transistor radios? Imagine that you could unplug from a radio and listen to music while riding your bike, WoW. Dick Tracy watches with little tvs on them! Of course that was impossible! I was born in 1951, and went to elementary school in Texas. One child's parents divorced in my first grade class, only one out of 30. it was the first time I heard the word. I didn't hear the word shit until 6th grade, and a year later the f word. interesting life span for sure.
It should be noted that someone's testimony being consistent doesn't necessarily make them any more reliable than a more inconsistent person. They can be consistently wrong.
What if the witnesses reported that their testimonies had been altered and the notorized signatures faked? Because that's exactly what Julie Ann Mercer (as well as a host of others) claimed when Mark Lane began interviewing them in 1964.
Crazy how it took almost 5 years for the narrative to come together. They arrested LHO in hours, he was dead in days & 70 years later the story still isn't straight. Anyone with a brain (no pun intended) can tell from ballistic images that the entrance wound is in the front of his head, not the back. Exit wound in the back. Opposite direction of the depository. Makes no sense.
@@deaddropholiday correct. Oswald was the fall guy. That's why he was killed. They couldn't let it get to trial because everyone would realize he was innocent and then they would start questioning why the government was so hard pressed to prosecute an innocent man. With their unbounded resources, they should've known (because they did) that Oswald wasn't their guy. All of the evidence was "tampered" with so badly because it was all planted.
Worth the wait. One of the best documentary channels I have ever watched, and LEMMiNO continues to live up to the sky-high standards he has set for himself and more. Bravo once more.
@@evilcrabking it’s definitely not when you consider that he has to research, write the script, edit the video and make sure that there are no mistakes in his videos. I find the amount of work he has to put in actually comparable to a thesis where you similarly have to spend a lot of time on the same subject. Also you have to keep in mind that there will be ups and downs during the whole process, increasing the time spent on the project. And I think I prefer having to wait than having mediocre videos be put out.
I love the modern TH-cam take on documentaries. No dramatic music, no weird nonsense interviews with "experts", no b-side camera shots. Just plain information.
Honestly i hate modern documentaries they try to make into a show. Even the “experts” are acting. I remember seeing a documentary about a murder case and two “officers” saw the “suspect” and the officers were saying they were scared. But the tone in their voice did not reflect that. The acting was so bad that I was cringing. And of course everything shown is all just a studio set. And what I hate more is when they try to give the backstory of the officers/expert. And this backstory is usually irrelevant things such as their childhood or what they like to do as a hobby. I hate how they try to make it about the people on their not the case. Then I watched a much older documentary and generally the narrator gives facts about the case or if they talk to experts the normally talk about what was going on through during the case. They never did any acting. And if there was a backstory they mostly talked about their credentials and they usually kept it brief. There were was no backstory about their daily lives or their childhood. In addition the only acting they ever did was for re-enactments but that’s about it. It was usually very minimal.
My biggest takeaway from this fantastic documentary is that people REALLY didn't like Arnold Rowland. He took more strays than Kennedy did in this film!
To be fair, the Rashomon Effect seems to have affected almost all the witnesses. It’s odd that the first 3 witnesses including his wife all disagreed regarding luggage/curtain rod box, etc.
The 3d graphics are so impressive! The lines where people walked cleared up everything in my mind! And thank you so much for cc! I can't hear well and seeing the words lets me relax. The music was also amazing! Very chilling and fitting. Please keep doing what you do!
I always thought that if I ever got interviewed by police and could't recall something correctly, I would immediately be assumed to be the one who did it. But this just shows how normal it is to not recall things that happened in such a chaotic manner correctly.
Depends if they have preconceived judgement or not If they don't like you and you can't remember, they might be looking for evidence to convict rather than if they have the right person If it's some sweet clueless dame, they'll swoon, and move on
It’s very difficult to reconstruct a scene based solely off of testimony, because everyone is biased, making it only natural to have conflicting testimonies. On top of that, those people were living their regular lives on a regular day, and no one is actually fully aware of their surroundings when going through a normal work day. Besides, when you hear gunfire, your immediate reaction is to run or flee from that location into safety, and you are definitely not paying attention as to who fired it or even possible suspects. You just want to save your life from potential danger, and the adrenaline rush can make you see or hear things that aren’t actually there or aren’t exactly as you remember. The fact that there were fingerprints from Lee Oswald on those shells, that he owned the very rifle from which the bullets were fired, that he ran away from the police and tried to sneak up into that theater to hide, as well as the very suspicious curtain rods story, surely points to him as being the assassin. However, due to the precarious handling of evidence and the failure to ensure Oswald’s continuous interrogation (allowing him to be shot dead) makes it impossible to find if he truly acted alone.
I've been on a rewatch kick of everything you've ever posted on your channel.. and it's amazing to see how you've evolved from a "TH-camr", to a proper filmmaker. 🏆👌
I love how seemingly honest these interviewees are. The wife straight up calls out her husband for being kind of a bullshitter who makes up stories to make himself sound smarter.
@@johnwright7895 They ARE the actual interviews. Every single quote is referenced in the document pinned to the top of this comments section by LEMMiNO. You can trace every quote back to its source. Every single word is authentic.
This is kind of scary. Think there are thousands of people that have been sent to prison over the years based solely on witness statements and look how wildly inconsistent all these witnesses statements are in this case.
*_@mikelindner2646_* Yes scary. But it's even worse than you say. Police corruption is not unknown. Take a look at a documentary movie called, The Thin Blue Line (1988).
@@williamwells8672and it’s not necessarily their fault. People, when under pressure, will go back in their brains and look for details and come to conclusions that aren’t true or accurate to the actual truth.
I didn't get chosen for jury duty once because I stated I wouldn't convict someone if the only evidence presented was a single witnesses testimony. That's terrifying to me, the fact that a DA would even go to court with that is insane.
Your videos are like rare gems, few but so precious. This will brighten up my week for sure! ♥ Thanks for keeping quality over quantity alive on this platform
@@haroldberserker lemmino had to completely move apartments and then he had some stuff come up in his life and then I believe he got sick during the making of this video. So that is why it took almost 2 years even though the actual quality of video is only like maybe 1 year worth of quality, because he had a bunch of stuff in his life come up and he had to stop making the video, but instead of rushing the video to make up for the time he lost when moving apartments and sick and other stuff, he decided to just keep working on it like normal.
Honestly, I've never found the JFK assassination that fascinating, but this was so well put together that it's peaked an interest. The visual layout really gave me a great sense of what was going on with the witness statements in terms of who was doing what, where and when and how all these contradictions in statements have come about. Fantastic voice actors too, their accents fit so nicely that I kind of forgot they were voice actors. Just incredible production values all-round and I really appreciate the presence of citations on-screen as well.
The CIA stuff is fascinating to me. This saga includes them coming to Kennedy with a plan to attack Miami (kill people) and blame it on the Cubans (I'll just say "fake 🏳️" because I'm afraid.. another example is the Gulf of Tonkin but that's a tame one) The president shut this down.. then he died. I wouldn't bet a dime on any of the other conspiracy theories but this whole vein is legitimate/concrete so it's not really even the same thing. There's no illuminati/satanists, it's just money and without us having a close eye on them they'll do absolutely evil things to get more. It's way out of control and it should be obvious.
Beep bop... I'm the Philosophy Bot. Here, have a quote: "The struggle itself towards the heights is enough to fill a man's heart. One must imagine Sisyphus happy" ~ Albert Camus
No wonder why Lemmino is not uploading for a year. The amount of work that has put into this is insane, and it's one and a half hours worth of content as well.
The Russians thinking the Cubans did it, the Cubans thinking the CIA did it, the CIA thinking maybe they did do it but if they didn’t it was probably the Russians who did it. Oswald can’t believe he’s not getting the credit for this.
@@peterfraser9070 I dont think Euins did indicate it was Mr O. In fact the bald spot suggests it wasnt Oswald. Originally Euins said he thought the man in the window was black. This changed to him being unsure as to whether the man was black or white. I think it is more interesting when he talls how the cop he was talking to received a call saying a man ran out the back of the TSBD....seemed to be ignored
Well, there's tons of evidence that says it's quite unbelievable that it wasn't Oswald in that window. Anyone claiming it wasn't him has a lot of explaining to do to be taken seriously. Care to try to explain the evidence away? Euins saying the sun was shining on a "bald spot" in reality does not rule Oswald out at all. There's footage of Oswald with a bright light shining on his head for a moment and his hair was so thin you could see his skin clear as day. It is very easy to imagine Euins seeing the same thing with the sun shining on Oswald's head. Euins did not first say the man was black, by the way; that was a radio interviewer mis-quoting Euins. Euins clarified that he was not sure about the man's skin colour; he'd only seen him briefly and there was a glare on the window.
Its really not that well researched, well put together by the team? For sure. There is a lot missing, and that he managed to miss so much in such a long video is kind of an achievment in itself.
@@Wunsci What were some of the main points missed, if you don't mind telling me? I thought this was a nice video, but also wondered how much more there was to cover. I don't know much of the details to this event. Really curious about it though.
[Credits, References, and More]
www.lemmi.no/p/the-kennedy-assassination-inside-the-book-depository
Another masterpiece sir
You done cooking
Please keep coming back, I love your content
thanks for the upload zaddy
Wow that is more references than a lot of good wiki articles, nice work.
Can I just quickly shout out how good that creepy little musical sting is during the chapter titles? Man I love that.
The Vincent Vinesausage???
This video is astounding by the way. Funny enough, I did a social studies project in the sixth grade about the JFK assassination, complete with a styrofoam recreation of Dealey Plaza, so it's wild to see this level of detail and research, down to the accurate 3D models. Well put-together and fascinating.
Sounds similar to the transition sound in the Walking Dead VR game
I was gonna comment the same thing. It sets the mood so well. Like a dark sudden confusion
Edit: now I'm shaking a little cause bimmy vinesauce himself might've seen my silly reply about the partially eaten chicken wing on another comment 😅😂
Im not surprised Vinny is here when conspiracies are brought up lol
More than anything else, the assassination is an amazing case study into how wildly unreliable witness statements are
Ask enough people and everything happened. Especially if you ask leading questions.
especially without recording the statements on tape. how could you ever tell what was true, what was poor memory, or a lie?
Only when they have something to cover up. When several people directly witness the same thing few details dont line up, for example the perps shoe color.
@@comradeeverclear4063 oh no the crazy ones are here already
@@luks303he's right tho?
This channel is the perfect example of the phrase “Good things come to those who wait”
Nope
Facts
@@Eldesinstaladoyep + ratio
@@Eldesinstalado You liked your own comment.
Maybe Fredrick knudsen will upload next
I like how we see the gut instinct of Marina Oswald at work. She was surprised by Lee's early return home, his lack of talk about the president's visit. So while she didn't believe he was planning any assassination attempt, her realising some shot the president from her husband's place of work, her first instinct was to check the placement of his gun, even if she didn't do it completely.
@limerence8365 great post !
Just as a side note or 2 concerning LHO's apparent total lack of interest in John F. Kennedy coming to Dallas. When living in Minsk during 1961-1962 Oswald was VERY aware and interested in Kennedy and his politics and in particular his relationship with Khrushchev and Russia. Marina and most all the Oswalds' friends there stated that emphatically. Also in the summer of 1962 Paul Gregory used to visit the Oswalds often in Ft. Worth --- he was entering college later that year and was taking conversational Russian lessons from Marina. Gregory stated nearly every time he was at the Oswalds there was the same copy of Time Magazine's Man of the Year on the living room coffee table, from January 5, 1962. You can imagine who that Man was -- John F. Kennedy.
@@DanC-go9lc YT's Sean Munger (PhD/historian/author/teacher) has a very compelling 2-part video into the Kennedy assassination. Aug. 2022 "Oswald Acted Alone - JFK Assassination Solved."
Even if anyone believes Oswald didn't act alone, they really owe it to themselves to watch this well-researched video.
@@isabellindlind Thanks and yes I have seen Munger's 2-part video and even though I don't think Munger has actually "solved" anything - he does have a fine video presenting the known facts and evidence. Priscilla Johnson McMillan's "Marina and Lee" is the most in-depth thing I have ever seen or read about Oswald's real life. It is so well-done that many are convinced McMillan must have been a CIA plant. Good day !
She recanted that testimony later saying the police made her say those things by pressuring her. Also that was a translation because her English at the time was to poor to understand what was being asked.
Oswald didn’t shoot Kennedy.
Because I did.
Ahhhhh yes. As someone who grew up in and still lives in Dallas, this has been the Lemmino video I've been looking forward to the most!
ratio
go away
Waiting for a video about bugfoot
That’s awesome! Were any of your relatives there on the day?
Shouldnt you be making videos about how kangaroos are the reason vietnam won the war?
Man, shoutout to the voice actors. It's nothing that seems super exciting but just the fact that this video takes the extra step on the details goes to show how high-quality the production is.
I thought that was ai generated
@@jangar5000 Me too! Some of the rhythm seemed off. I could understand it. Hiring 15+ voice actors would be very expensive.
@@heron2 they were real people. Look at the credits at the end
@@Literature4343 oh, haha! Thanks.
@@heron2 lemino is definitely one of those people who would never replace actual people work with ai
Been hoping for this being covered for ages, thank you as ever for the quality content
Hey it’s the Irish guy
Did they call you the Assassination King back in college?
ALL HAIL THE DRIFT KING
Hello Irish man
Don't worry! we, the FBI, have got your back! you're one of the best.
There is absolutely nothing that just happened that made want to rewatch this video
😂
🗿
HAHAHQHAH
🍊
This reinforces the lone gunman and the right-place-right-time theory.
This whole thing seems like an excellent case study into why eye witness testimony is not weighed as heavily anymore in court. People misremember, wrongly perceive, or unintentionally imagine things without realizing it all the time.
it also reminds us that the the person interviewing can lead, or push eye witnesses to 'see' and 'say' what fits an agenda.
I wish they never did this bc than they could just say what ever they want
Also the desire to want to help, to want to sound aware of their surroundings, and the notoriety of being at the scene of the event, could easily influence improper memories or statements. Even more subtle is the way that subconscious consensus, due to publicized information, can influence your perception. If those same witnesses had all been immediately isolated minutes after the shooting, and never told anything and never allowed to read or watch anything leading up to the interview, and then asked about everything they saw that day, there’d be no inherent focus on scrutinizing the actions and whereabouts of Oswald, other than the leading and incessant questions by the cops regarding Oswald. If cops too were to have no prior suspicions (so ideally an uninformed interrogator), then you’d actually see an interrogation cobble together a pure and unbiased timeline of events (flawed as they may still be, due to the frailties of memory).
Or lie
This is why I don’t believe a single one of the eye witnesses that swear they heard multiple explosions before the towers fell
I’m not saying other parts of the conspiracy are false but whenever a 9/11 truther brings up the eye witnesses saying they heard bombs, I just laugh. Bc that literally could be anything. You had bodies slamming into the ground at terminal velocity and all the other sounds. A civilian can’t even tell the different between a firework and a gunshot and you’re telling me they can tell the different between a bomb going off and something out in the high stress and chaotic environment of 9/11? No way in hell
If you’ve ever tried looking at a building’s windows or tried locating whether the noise you hear in your flat is coming from above, below or next door, you know that none of the witness accounts mean much. It’s just too hard to tell such things, especially when you’re not expecting something to happen.
Absolutely. The last apartment I lived at was like a giant echo chamber. I was convinced, on multiple occasions, that people were climbing the fire escape outside my bedroom window. Every time it turned out to be coming from the street, often across the street.
Yeah, the first time I opened all the windows in an apartment I'd spend the weekend in had a noise coming out of the painting but only when I laid down. The noise would come from everywhere in any other part of the room.
Turns out I forgot about the fountain outside and never experienced this cause I had never opened the windows.
the worst thing is that noone anticipated this event and the noises assiciated with it. i bet directional estimates would be 10x better if people knew "there will be gunsounds in the next 5 minutes"
I especially don't trust the accounts of the people who were standing outside, describing what they saw inside the building, several stories up and often from quite the distance. I'm sure you could easily tell if a person stands in a window from across the street, but the people describing facial features, height, even machine guns and such...Yeah, not buying it.
As Native from Dallas the entirety of downtown is an echo chamber.
This is perhaps the only channel on youtube where I actually do not mind waiting almost two years for a single video. The quality of Lemmino's content is second to none.
part of me was worried he'd vanished off the face of the platform, but im very glad to be proven wrong
@@Seagull_HouseI subbed to his patreon to make sure he was alright lol
How’s he gonna make a video of one small aspect of the case then at the end essentially rules out a conspiracy completely? There’s a doc on abc7 news on TH-cam by Josiah Thompson that’s more comprehensive mainly focusing on the physical evidence and not just unreliable contradicting witness testimonies
@@Seagull_House saw some comments on his last video from his patreons telling that he was close to fishing the video. So I didn’t worry much and i figured it would be uploaded whrn he hit 5mil as hes done a milestone video for every millionth subscriber
This video was not my favorite. Too chaotic. Kinda boring.
what a perfect time to get this video recommended
Same lmao
cia got sloppy
Reply to *AMC2283* (because he keeps reporting my reply)
You're the one who decided to question my original comment and as is typical of you fantasists, you cannot answer a basic question. That's not smart that's dumb. If you are so smart, how come you have never been able to prove your case?
Clearly, this subject matter is way over your head.
Presenting evidence is like in the Court room. Two sides bring their evidence and suppositions and they leave it to the jury to decide the verdict.
Nobody's saying that the Warren Commission was perfect or even that it answered all of the questions. But sane people realise that all investigations are like that.
Based on the evidence presented over 61 years since that day in November 1963, nobody has been able to bring a single shred of evidence that anyone other than Oswald was involved. But you're trying to claim that he was the innocent patsy all along, but as yet you have not been able to provide one single iota of proof.
You refuse to be objective on the subject but choose to follow your own petty prejudice and paranoia.
So come on, if you're so smart answer these questions.
Frazier and Randle testified that Oswald had a long package with him that morning. If they were lying about the package to frame Oswald, why? If the police officers forged a paper bag to explain how Oswald brought the rifle into the building unseen, wouldn't they have taken the time to photograph it where they were going to claim it was discovered on the sixth floor? How could they have known so early in the investigation that no one had seen Oswald with a rifle so that they would need something to cover the rifle and properly frame Oswald? How did they know to add fibers from a blanket? How did they know in which blanket Oswald had kept the rifle or even that he had kept the rifle in a blanket? If they did plant the fibers, why not plant enough to make the evidence conclusive? More importantly, how would they have known that Randle and Frazier were going to say they saw Oswald with a bag? They had not talked to either one yet. They were both friends with Oswald, so what motivation would they have to lie and frame him? If Oswald did want curtain rods for his room, why did he have to go home on a Thursday to get them when he could have easily have gotten them over the weekend? Where did he get the curtain rods? Where did the curtain rods go? Why did Oswald need curtain rods if there were curtain rods already up? Why did Oswald deny to the cops that he had a long bag, and insist that he brought only a sandwich to work? How did Oswald's fingerprint and palmprint get on the bag? Where did the rifle in the Paine garage go, if it was not the Mannlicher-Carcano found on the sixth floor of the Depository? How did a rifle matching Oswald's appear in the Depository if it was not brought there by him? If he didn't take the rifle, why did Oswald, for the first time during his entire marriage, leave his wedding ring at home (1H73)?
OSWALD DID IT, CASE CLOSED
The thing about Oswald is that he was seemingly the real example of someone who no one notices. He was such a loner to all of his coworkers and no one noticed him until afterwards, when he was said to be the assassin, that his coworkers started looking for him in their memories.
I wonder (my conspiracy hat on) if the 'black old man' that ppl saw at the top floor was actually the one on the first floor moving up?
That's a great point. People who become notable or infamous for some reason after being anonymous...it's amazing how folks will elevate themselves in their proxy to that person. I saw it first hand living in San Bernardino to the shooters in the 2015 massacre here. Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik in reality were a couple of radicalized loners living in the adjacent city of Redlands. But suddenly, all these folks had these interactions with them that didn't line up with reality.
Similar to many school shooters today huh?
😊
@@keyboardwarrior7538Isn't it a little odd that Bonnie Williams was eating chicken alone near where the shot was taken then there were remains of that same meal in the snipers nest, where some witnesses saw an African American shooter?
21:06 The “reoccurring dreams” part is a fantastically eerie addition. The way the interviewer is taken aback by such an odd and personal question…it doesn’t necessarily add much to the case, but it goes a long way to show the impact this event had on the people who witnessed it
That dude was def full of shit
i like your interpretation of it. i thought the kid was making fun of the interviewer for implying he should've told someone about the ostensibly innocuous thing he'd experienced
It's so striking because it comes deep in the midst of a swamp of names, positions, logistics and timestamps. After being deluged with facts and put in a firmly analytical frame of mind we're suddenly reminded that this was a deeply traumatic event, both for the nation and the witnesses. It elevates the assassination from a piece of political history to something out of modern myth. It's like something out of Twin Peaks
The guy was said to be a pathological liar. I don't doubt he felt partly responsible for not calling attention to the window rifle, but I'm pretty sure the dream part was some of that fancy imagination of his. "Man, if this were a picture, the hero would be having dreams of the event every night" or something. That's at least my take on this.
Just like the video states, it's hard not to be impacted by watching the President of the United States be killed with a headshot right in front of you in the middle of the Cold War.
You know it’s a good day when LEMMINO uploads and it’s more than an hour and a half.
More like a good year 😅
Good year 😅😅
yeah like he hasn't posted in a year
yes!!
YES LOL
This is one of the best produced docs if ever watched. From the graphics to the voiceover to the creepy music, it's just well done. I wish you had a lot more of these to watch, even more on this story. Excellent execution!
How is this free? This dude goes dark for over a year and then comes back with a full length documentary of insane quality. This is really one of the best channels on TH-cam.
Not free. Thank the patreons.
Exactly what I was thinking.
But then again when you think about it we'd get similar stuff on TV it would just be filled with ads.
@@darth3261 I didn't pay anything. It's free.
@@butterphli3znothing is free
@@butterphli3zlol what if your friend flies you out to Vegas; the flight was free!
I cannot imagine the amount of documents and records someone had to go through for this video. It might be the most impressive documentary I've ever seen.
Check out "the smoking gun" about an Australian detective who surmised that a secret agent in the car behind the president accidentally shot Kennedy with a franigble bullet (designed to explode on contact like the Zapruder footage clearly shows
You obviously haven't seen many cause this has been done to death and is completely unoriginal
Shut up @@daragh9472
Pretty solid stuff. Idk if anyone else was thrown off by the English but its kind of cool in an unsettling way. I know that its propper English, Most of them speak very well but we just don't answer questions and form sentences like that anymore. 60 years ago seems like such a short time in the past but feels so far away.
I sure learned a lot more than I did at first . The guyg he rode with said the sack the gun was in wasn't quite that long it's confusing but he was involved some how lee Oswald
It would be incredible if you covered the Zodiac investigation. Not the murders, but the press and police investigation because there are some extremely wild things in there.
Now that would be a rather impressive followup to the Jack the Ripper video!
Always wanted to see this after the Jack the Ripper episode. Wasn't sure it Lemmino would ever do more true crime related videos. But with DB Cooper and Jack the Ripper it leaves the door open a bit.
I like the very grounded and factual look at the cases and the new animations have been top notch.
Shu T up Shu T up Shu T T He up
That would most definitely be a Lemmino video.
like?
One of the most prepared videos i have even seen in youtube. Congrats on your work.
I like on how Lemmino went from being a typical Top 10 TH-cam channel, to literally producing both music and free Netflix tier high quality crime documentaries on TH-cam. You're a legend bro.
Netflix documentaries are usually a bloated mess stuffed with red herrings and pointless filler content just so they can take a topic and stretch it out into multiple episodes to bolster their “viewing time” metrics. Lemmino’s stuff is much more to-the-point and “all killer, no filler.” Just compare the way DB Cooper was covered between the 2. This channel’s version was infinitely more engaging, IMO.
A bit like the Simon Whistler transition. He started with a top 10 channel as well, and has now an expanded universe of channels with all kinds of topics.
Went from a top 10 youtuber to the top 1 youtuber
cuz hes being funded by the feds to push out mind rotting propaganda
No contest between Netflix documentaries and his. His blow theirs out of the water.
My uncle was a homicide detective. Once, he told me about a case he worked that really frustrated him. Two guys had shot each other at a house party. One of them died while the other was badly injured, but lived. There was literally dozens of witnesses to it (they'd apparently got in quite a screaming match first, drawing everyone's attention). He interviewed all of them to find out what exactly happened (depending on how the confrontation went, the guy who lived could be brought to trial for murder or get a lower charge if it was in self defense).
Everybody remembered it differently, even when he eliminated the testimony of the victim's friends and those that were too intoxicated to really be trustworthy. There were five people there that hadn't drank or smoked anything, didn't know the guys, and were close enough that they heard/saw the entire argument. They each had a different memory of how it happened. Not even a little different. Vastly different. When told about the other people's recollections, none of them changed their story. They were all confidant that it happened exactly how they remembered it.
Human recollection is incredibly finicky and unreliable, especially in stressful moments. It's why so many prisoners were exonerated when DNA began being used. We;re just not designed to perfectly pay attention to every detail, we're lucky if we even remember the broad strokes. Even worse, when pressured to remember more, sometimes our brains will fabricate details that are completely wrong. We should all feel blessed to live in a society where we can pull out our phones and have perfect documentation of how things happen. We think police brutality is bad now, imagine what it used to be like when they had literally no oversight and everybody was taught to trust their word over anyone else's. Terrifying!
Edit: Answering some questions. I sadly don't know how the case was concluded. I was told this back in the early 2000s, not sure exactly when (I was fairly young) and my uncle has since passed away so I can't ask him. It was in California though if anyone wants to try and track it down themselves.
Also I didn't mean to come across as police being bad there at the end. I'm more of the opinion that there are a few really bad apples that ruin the bunch. The thing is, now we actually have methods to catch those bad apples, while before video cameras became prevalent it was always the accused criminals word against the police officers. Pretty much everyone would believe the cop before some random person, which they should since most criminals lie about their crimes (DUH). The idea of there being corrupt or even criminal police wasn't really a common thought until more recent times (among the majority of the population at least). I could be wrong about that, but when I talk with my parents and grandparents, the current anti police mentality of the younger generation is very foreign to them.
P.S. i'm not a robot writing this, LOL. I know you're only supposed to use one space between sentences in academic papers, but I always found it easier to read when there was multiple. Sorry if it annoys the more academically inclined.
If I may ask, what happened to the case? Was there a definite conclusion in the end? Was reasonable doubt implemented instead?
That is a horrifying conclusion
I was thinking that when the first discrepancy showed up, where one man said Oswald had a package in his hands and the other man said he did not. My job is some form of a doorman, and I wouldn't be able to tell you if the person that entered two minutes ago was wearing shorts or pants. It's impossible to be that certain about minor details regarding people you don't care about
@@jjclark1035We need to go back to those simpler times
How did that case ended?
This shows why eye witness testimony is actually fairly useless yet people get sent to prison on similar testimony all the time. We are all fairly useless at noticing at what is going on around us
and yet the video relies on testimony to put Lee Oswald at the 6th floor half an hour before the shooting, carrying a long and thin bag into the building, being at the 2nd floor after 1-2 minutes of shooting, the shot came from the book depository etc. These are all based on testimony as well.
It's not useless but it's not 100% accurate. Remember this is before forensic science breakthroughs so witnesses are necessary to build a case.
Sometimes testiomy is all we got
@@ru40342 Nobody seems to ever ask, if he wasn't the shooter, why did he shoot a police officer and try to go on the run by sneaking into a cinema after the president was shot from his place of work?
@@ru40342 You think its just a coincidence that the dude ran away and shot a police officer immediately afterwards?
Great video! As someone that’s been interested in the Kennedy assassination for years, seeing a video like this just makes my night. The music, presentation, everything is so well done. Great job!
Something I absolutely love, that you also did an exceptional job with in the Jack the Ripper video, is your use of visuals to build maps and timelines to give context that's easy to follow.
my dumbass is so bad at following timelines and stuff, its a genuine accessibility feature to disabled nerds and im so glad its becoming more popular. i love bobbybroccoli's videos for the same reason. ive seen some people call it the 'jon bois' style but idk if that refers more to the manipulation of google maps than anything
THIS! Så sjukt snyggt med dina informativa kartor. Underbart att se! Just as in Jack rippade vid aswell
That’s probably my all time favorite TH-cam video to date.
Fr
@@brittanybeauvais right?? its so perfectly explained, ive rewatched it several times!! Along with that JCS casey anthony video. I know the stories but just goes to show the power of a good storyteller. I'll be rewatching this one again too I can already tell!
Animating this whole building + roads around it, being able show the different floors as well as the people and boxes in there... the voice actors... the clean chapter design... all these little details. You're crazy for putting this high quality content out here for free. Thanks man, you're awesome!
The voices actors are AI generated
@@Shylteryne what makes you think that
@@ShylteryneIn the credits the voice actors are displayed.
He gettin paid bruh.
@@foximacentauri7891 try re-listening to a pair of dialogue with the same lines. The repeating “yes, sirs” or “no, sirs” are good examples. If you compared them, they sound exactly the same! From pitch to tone and inflections.
In a lot of lines, you can hear common AI generated artifacts, such as: voices that sounds “staticy” and peaks often.
Just re-listen, i’m 99% certain it’s AI
lemmino's documentaries are getting longer and longer which is amazing, makes a year worth waiting
Really? Think he takes the piss tbh
@@heath622 bruh
@@NicoTheCinderace he does though. A year and half to make a video on something that's been to death
a full length documentary is nice but if he can cut it into 30 mins part for weekly release, engagement would be so much higher
he needs to hire another person or two otherwise he's gonna be uploading once per year forever
0:35 The volume dial rotating as the volume of the tv lowers is just an insane amount of attention to detail
it quirked my autism too bro
The voice acting in this is very good. You did a great job casting the right people for the right roles.
Fancy seeing you here. I’m a fan
It's the same voice for nearly all the males
Eyy it's JJ!
Sounds like AI
I think some of them were AI generated, weren't they?
The fact Lemmino makes everything from the graphics to the music is some serious dedication to his craft, I hope to become as skilled as such in the future, amazing video right here
And then some no talent twitch streamer uploads the whole video and makes money out of it
@@iamnotanundercoverfederalagenthe does outsource, these videos are seriously produced and he works with other professionals
According to the description the music is not created by him...
Just think about the massive value Hasan and xQc added to the video when they watched it to babysit their audience on stream. No comparison!
This "amazing video" mud the subject and is crap.
The quality of this documentary is what SHOULD be shown on the History Channel these days.
you don't want to watch two guys poking through barns?
Yeah. It’s all ice road truckers and 2 wierdos haggling with other wierdos over old junk.
@@andrewfield5656 ice road truckers is goated tho
YES I AGREE with you 100% 👍🏼
you don't wanna watch idiots calling everything aliens?
Now seems like the perfect time to watch this.
This channel has become TH-cam's best example of quality over quantity. Amazing work.
Under rated comment
that is kurzgesagt motto
@@bruhmantisthe wave
you said what it needed to be said
Oversimplified kinda great
Its a good day when Lemino uploads
A RARE sight
Exactly my thought
Indeed it is.
It sure is.
Is Lemino his second channel?
"Yeah my husband is full of shit all the time" is a hilarious turn
Jesus Christ loves you so much and died for your sins💙❤️
@@marvolovesgod385wtf
@@jenniferclark746😂
I know, right? I'm dying to know if that marriage lasted
Were they married high school students?!
We all know why we're back here today
I'm back here because it showed up in my feed again but now I know why
I wanted to write ,,XqC?" But then I saw the comment's date.
true
It's crazy because about a few weeks before the trump assisnation attempt happened this popped up in my feed
Was thinking the same thing. Yet again it’s weird it was forced into my feed
The whole paper bag thing is hilarious, imagine asking workers whose job is to handle paper wrapped packages all day to remember the dimensions of one specific package that wasn't even part of their job.
If anything, it'd be more suspicious if someone recalled the exact precise details.
And according to Oswald; let's not forget about the curtain rods that vanished up someones prison wallet.
@@SKeeetcher the curtain rods are the real killer smh...
Now, I don't know the entire line of products kept in the depository. If the place handled only books though, I'd say the paper bag was of a very odd shape for any practical use for books.
@Obeythebeard The paper bag came from inside the store. Check the video there is a photo of it. It was a "gift paper"-like contraction.
I'm so glad you talked about the echo because it's one of the things that seems to get inexplicably overlooked so often. A good example of this phenomenon was during the Mandelay Bay shooting where you can hear in bodycam footage and 911 calls that there was a lot of uncertainty about the number and location of shooters due to the echo from the buildings, and the police were having a hard time pinpointing his location.
There's a lot of strangeness about that event too. Could very well be another incident of multiple shooters and one patsy.
@@wilekrowan3610 It seems like a typical American thing by now.
@@wilekrowan3610a mass shooter appearing out of no where using the exact type of gun armaments the ATF wants to ban
@@wilekrowan3610 I find the arguments around Mandalay Bay pretty unconvincing tbh, although I'll admit I don't know as much about them as the JFK conspiracies. Afaik the main mystery is the motive but that goes doubly so for some kind of cover-up. The idea that a government body enlisted dozens or hundreds of people to help stage a shooting and then successfully cover up the true nature of the shooting while also faking a large amount of evidence seems like an unreasonable amount of effort to put into a scheme supposedly designed to push for gun control, especially since there have obviously been many other mass shootings previously that resulted in no change to legislature. To me it seems ridiculous to suggest a large number of people were involved in a plot to kill dozens of people with the end goal to be to push for banning bump stocks. The government would be risking a huge amount if any part of the scheme were to be found out, for example if one of the hundreds of people on the ground happened to record any of the other shooters, for very little gain.
Like I said though, I'm not well informed about Mandalay Bay conspiracies so if you have any decent evidence feel free to enlighten me
Mandela(y) effect
My guy went from making top 10 videos to being one of the very best documentary channels on the entire internet. Absolutely outstanding video man, you're a damn legend. Seeing you grow as a creator has been my great pleasure. Keep up the fantastic work, and thank you for the entertainment.
He also made some pretty good songs too, I absolutely loved Infinity by him.
He didn't even mention the umbrella guy or the magic bullet. Biased video.
This video sucked honestly.
@@ok-nz7mt
Have you actually watched the video? Or were you just waiting for him to confirm your favorite theory and therefore ended up disappointed that he didn't?
Because he started and ended the video by addressing just that : there are countless theories and you can't reasonably cover them all, he made a choice and decided to stick to facts on one particular angle. It's up to you then to make up your mind.
Him not agreeing with you doesn't mean he's biased.
@@ok-nz7mt how does that make him biased?
One of the most important interrogations in the history of the united states and they didnt have a tape recorder.
Fantastic video!
then again
Texas cops. In the 60s.
Nobody should be surprised.
So much of this can be explained by the fact that human memory sucks. For example, the sheer number of people who are falsely imprisoned due to incorrect witness testimony is actually frightening. The human memory is staggeringly unreliable and is prone to exaggeration and falsification, not to mention susceptible to suggestion.
Human memory is also one of the foundations for the most successful species which has occupied this planet over 4.6 billion years. And not all memory is judged equal. At one end of the spectrum you have people with severe conditions (such as dementia) which severely impact on the accuracy of memory. At the other end you have people who can memorize highly complex concepts instantaneously and be able to recount them - with perfect accuracy - forty years later.
not memory itself, which is usually pretty reliable, but memory of a person under a state of shock
@@ThiagoSilva-gb2iv Shock can lead to gaps in memory. But it's specific to the individual in question. If memory in such conditions is so poor then this undermines the argument that we can draw any conclusions about the testimonies of those interviewed following Dallas - either for Oswald or against him.
@@ThiagoSilva-gb2iv Shock and trauma leads to exaggerated stories or stories that have parts that are missing and our minds just make things up to fill those holes.
Vsauce 2 did a great video about this
After a stressful event like a shooting, it's rare for people to give an accurate recounting of events. Some people who have fired in self defense remember firing 2 shots when they actually fired 10, things like that.
You again… Hi
yeah it's common in police shootings.
The investigation from congress stated that the Kennedy assassination was likely the result of conspiracy and even now, there are thousands of documents that the CIA refuses to release.
This guy doesn’t know shit, he’s built a pretty time line but doesn’t have any deeper access than what is available online
I love his videos but to dismiss the surrounding secrecy is ignorance to the point of absurdity
It's probably added on even more stress that it was the presidents assassination
LMFAO I remember shooting 5-6 bullets when they told me they packed 10 in the army . I legit was counting them tho. IT's greece so it's possible.
I mean isn't this a perfect demonstration why witness testimony should never be considered as direct evidence. It is one of the least reliable forms of evidence. You cannot rely on human memory even if they're not trying to fabricate a story.
But my god what a masterclass by Lemmino. I've seen documentaries with actual budgets that don't even come close to this level.
Jack ruby short for jack rubenstien
@@athejbaka7084 Oh FFS.
Too bad security cameras weren't a thing yet
@@athejbaka7084 Go ahead and say _exactly_ what you're trying to say, wimp.
I completely agree I just get upset when people disregard it cause it's not 100% accurate. I guess I think it shouldn't be primary evidence but secondary. Elizabeth Loftus the person who brought to light that memory isn't 100% reliable, literally goes to every court case she can go to, simply to say that cause eye witnesses testimony is not accurate 100% of the time it should be disregarded (she literally did this in the Ghilsaen Maxwell trial which i think is disgusting).
Crazy how I can watch quality videos like this for free on youtube, truly one of the best LEMMiNO.
I love the 3d animations. That type of thing makes it SO easy to visualize the setting and scenario. Better editing than mainstream documentaries. Please do more like that, love it.
The editing truly has far more clarity than some documentaries I've seen on larger streaming platforms. I find it a shame when I hear people who don't watch many videos online automatically disregarding content posted on TH-cam. Some people I know, if I start a sentence with "I watched a TH-cam video about..." they automatically think low quality content, whereas if I saw "I watched a documentary about..." you can tell they're listening far more intently. Honestly, I've seen far worse (surface level, dramatized, sensational) documentaries coming out of Netflix or Disney+ than some of what's available on TH-cam. Once again, Lemmino absolutely knocks it out of the park.
Reminds me of Hitman/SUPERHOT
His art style kinda reminds me of the Hitman GO game, got that same board game vibe going on.
@@randomcommenter7343 This is better than ANYTHING ever produced around the JFK assassination. We love in glorious times when the best talent are able to self fund themselves and produce pieces like this.
Can we just appreciate the amount of research and editing and the hours of finding the good music, the good 3d renders and all those photos, the masterclass of a story and the transitions between events and the easy visualisation, Honestly the Documentary is a work of art.
I agree , I've heard a lot of the testimony in this video , but never sequentially matched with the graphics of the building . It makes for great visualization and better understanding .
I might be missing something , but Charles Givens eating his lunch on the 6th floor at the center window approx. 5 to ten minutes before the shooting and not noticing while someone lays silent a few feet from him in the the South East corner snipers nest seems unlikely .
There are too many conflicting testimonies by witnesses on the street and those on the 6th floor at that critical moment .
@vicschauberger2737 he makes the music
@@vicschauberger2737 look
@@vicschauberger2737 Not Charles Givens but Bonnie Ray Williams (Oswald's co-worker).
Even though it's all wrong
God, how Lemmino does transitions and effects are so fantastic. The transition sound between each chapter gives me goosebumps and shivers each time.
yep sth about that sound really gets to me. i was scrolling through the comments to see if i was the only one. def a very effective sound then it would seem. nice work lemmino!
i liked it but thought it to be quite loud
@@squ1dd13the sound was a nice addition
I loved the crispness and distortion of it at the end. Great mood setter imo
I agree, was watching this while washing my face and I was sure someone was behind me lmao 😭
This is a well organized, rational video that takes a thoughtful dive into a still popular and debated subject. Thank you
These videos are so bittersweet. So good, but a gentle reminder we will be waiting another year for him to drop a new masterpiece. Truly one of your best works.
Imagine the research involved in this? Voluminous in nature as well as piecing all that research to make sense to people! Very responsible and the outmost brilliant work!
It's nice to see something like this get lots of views. Counters all the knocked up in an afternoon stuff of someone playing a video game or their dog meeting a kitten for the first time and speaking " in bubbles" dog talk.
Sadly my dog was shot during a visit to Dallas whilst whilst doing his business on a grassy knoll, so I cannot make money that way. :(
I cannot comprehend how this is on youtube of all places, and not on netflix or a streaming service. MASSIVE respect to you and the effort you put in.
True.
He should at least try to submit this to Netflix or something. It could be great a success.
@@imay3610 Netflix would just control his direction and his brand.
He already has patreon. Why bother netflix
Right like how is this free to watch
I'm glad he is exactly where he is, instead of being beholden to some corporation.
I decided to watch this during a very noisy flight, and I just wanted to say; your clear pronounciation, crisp consonants, good audio mixing, and subtitles/visual clues on every major point, made this easily watchable even when almost inaudible. Your production efforts do not go unappreciated.
And on top of that I'm sure it kept you entertained and the time flew by (I had to, come on 😂).
I need more details. When you say noisy flight, are we talking screaming children or soviet built helicopter in Pakastan. This seems like it was a pretty extreme experience.
nc headphones
Almost inaudible? Did you watch this on speaker mode?😂 Most headphones/earbuds would make watching videos super easy on planes
@@randomguy8228 I was sitting right over the engine, white noise was so bad you couldn't hear the next person talking to you, and even with earbuds on max volume it drowned out most of the sound. I kept my earbuds in as earplugs even when not watching anything to protect my hearing. Don't buy the cheapest tickets you can find.
Quality my boy! Good shit.
In Oswald's defense(?), the number of times I have been at work, walked through or been in a room, had someone say "oh when did you get here" and dont believe that I have walked past them multiple times is amazing.
some people are just really good at being ghosts.
It's literally a joke at my workplace that sometimes we don't see each other come in if there's customers around- just today a coworker of mine came in and was doing paperwork in the back room for half an hour before I went back there and noticed she'd arrived
I always get yelled at because i spook people. Growing up with cats, i tried to move silently to not dusturb them when they sleep and stuff. Apparently i accidentally became very good at sneaking and at this point i try to get people to notice me as to not spook them by batman appearing behind them.
Yes very true.
He really could have been one of those coworkers where they didnt really pay much mind to him and he didn't pay much mind to them. I had an acquaintance that didnt even realize we were in the same class until halfway through the year. It can be surprisingly easy to become invisible to others.
I once was in a meeting with six other coworkers and as the meeting was about to begin, one of my coworkers asked if we shouldn't first wait for me to arrive before starting. He literally didn't notice that I was sitting directly across from him.
So yeah, I have no question that somebody might not be able to recall the exact positioning of a bunch of chicken bones.
Man modeled the whole building, cut it, and kept showing the floors with meticulous detail, goes over it with amazing animation, and shows a documentary far more detailed than any documentary can do. This man cooked his video to perfection and the video tastes so good. I'd easily find myself watching it again.
It's a great video! It also shows something that the legal system is well aware, and that eyewitness testimony can be sketchy and sometimes unreliable. People remember things out of order, or convince themselves they saw something. If it is a famous case, they may fabricate things to make themselves a part of it.
He actually has animators and editors to do it for him.
@@ashishhembrom3905 🤓
@@ashishhembrom3905who cares? its still amazing
@@ashishhembrom3905 No. LEMMiNO does all the animations and editing by himself. Why do you think these videos take so long to make?
If you don't believe me skip to the credits at the very end. There's credits for Patreon supporters, voice actors, archival footage and audio, images, 3D assets, and music, but none for animation or editing.
Insane from seeing this channel go from Top 10 Memes , to a full blown production channel capable of making the most intriguing and comprehensive videos on the platform . Man it gives me chills seeing your come up to and receiving the flowers you deserve .
We've come a long way
What flowers? I never saw any flowers. Are you ok?
I was just thinking that. I’ve been subbed to this channel for a long ass time but I haven’t seen any videos for a long while till this got recommended. I don’t remember what video exactly I seen from him back then but it had to be video game related since I was maybe 14-15 at the time lol
@@alexjones2677 its a figure of speech it means he's receiving praise
@@alexjones2677Room temperature iq
The amount of frustration I feel because of all the contradicting evidence, eye witness accounts etc. is incredible! Thanks for making this amazing video, it really showcases how weird this case actually was!
Google Kennedy/Lincoln coincidence and it gets even weirder... Much, much weirder If you haven't heard about it already, it will change your life forever
I find it absolutely Insane that I started watching Lemmino for His rage comics and now he is out here creating literal masterpieces of entertainment.
facts
I can remember when the Top Ten Things about FNAF came out and I was so young I was too scared to watch it ahaha.
@@theskiegringaseenthat video and the top 10 GTA facts cause I was worried my mom would find out 😂
Same here, I remember some of his first videos. Its a mental flashbang that its the same dude, with the insane quality of content now.
I remember watching Top 10 facts about swear words, and I was like "ayy this ain't memes, I'm gonna get on trouble if I watch this"
Watched this after I saw people saying that it was wrong for bigger channels to steal views so decided to watch it on my own. Well worth the hour and a half and incredibly well put together
"bigger channels to steal views " ? this is hilarious to me. Only if someone were to literally repost someone else's work as their own could they be stealing views. lol
@@Alec0124xQc did exactly that. He did a "react" to this whole video and put it on his channel
@@ivanschleppenbach6461 oh wow. yeah 2M subscribers is a lot. I assumed people wouldn't have many subscribers if they're just copy-pasting.
To be fair, I came to this video and ended up subscribing thanks to VTH. He usually has something to say to add context to the videos he's reacting to.
@Alec0124 but you are one of few most people would never watch the guy or subscribe to him ever
@@Alec0124 bruh adding three bits of useless info then leaving the room for a piss is really adding context to the 12 months that lemmino put in to create this video 🤦♂
I've watched several professionally made for TV documentaries about the Kennedy Assassination, and none of them have been as good as this right here. No bias, no conspiracy chasing, no smoke, just the accounts of that moment. I love this. Please keep doing what you're doing.
I, too, have watched many of those documentaries. But, I have been a Kennedy assassination buff since the age of 18 years old. I became extremely more interested in this assassination after I read the book, "Best Evidence", by Wesley Liebeler (not sure if I spelled his last name right but the book title is correct). He was an investigator on the Warren Commission. There was also supposed to be a follow-up book but I never was able to find a second book. Over the years, though, I started to become a little bit suspicious about whether or not there was a second gunman. Whether he was in the grassy knoll or in a storm drain like Johnny Rosselli told Bill Bononno, it started to not make sense. I don't have any doubt that Oswald did fire shots at Kennedy. In any event, I watched a documentary called, "The Smoking Gun". It was done by a retired Australian Detective. After he completes his investigation into the whole affair, he also incorporates parts of an investigation that was being done by a Firearms expert in the late 60s. I had been aware of that investigation that that gentleman had started in the late sixties. As far as I'm concerned, after watching this documentary called, "The Smoking Gun", this case is closed! Anyone with an interest in this assassination needs to watch this documentary. Whether you agree with it or not is up to you. But, I will say this much, the shot that went into Kennedy's head was fired from a gun that uses frangible bullets. The mannlicher-carcano rifle that Oswald used, did not fire frangible bullets. That is evidenced in the fact of the, "pristine bullet" that was found on the stretcher in one piece. They were able to prove that that pristine bullet was fired from Oswald mannlicher-carcano rifle. A frangible bullet is one that breaks into small pieces the minute it hits its Target. The only weapons that day that fired frangible bullets were AR-15s. I understand that people have their whole life careers invested in this assassination who will not want to admit that that documentary I am talking about solves this case. A lot of people have been making money off of writing books and acting like they're trying to solve this controversial assassination. Consequently, they have every motive to tear apart something that actually is the final word on the Kennedy assassination. This case is closed! I'm sorry I don't have a link for that documentary but all you have to do is search TH-cam for "The Smoking Gun". I stopped short of saying who the documentary thinks was the shooter of frangible bullet because I think people would like to watch that video and find out what it says for themselves as they go through all the evidence that he presents.
@@MichaelStichaufSaying you been a JFK assassination buff since you were 18 just makes you sound like a conspiracy nut. Weirdo
Anyone who seriously uses “conspiracy” as a bad word at this point should be publicly humiliated and not allowed access to the general public.
@@BBeowulf the fuck are you on about
@@BBeowulf Would that make you feel safe enough to remove the tin foil hat and step out of the echo chamber to join the general public? I feel like anyone who seriously thinks some of these outlandish, physics-defying, human nature defying conspiracy theories could actually be true needs a psychological evaluation. The reality is that you like a good conspiracy because it's exhilarating and juicy, often much more so than the truth, and will seek out a good conspiracy in anything. The vast majority of the time though, things are just what they are and nothing more, and attempts to dismiss overwhelming evidence to chase one lone outlier often just makes you look like a fool. The ability to put aside biases and recognize things for how they are is a big sign of maturity. Someone who dismisses everything because it doesn't make them feel good inside is very insecure and immature.
Love the cutting music, super nice and calming.
Love this video, so much information, and amazing for work as a podcast 👌
30:02
Investigator: Who did you see in the buildin-
Amos. E: B A L D
unironically it makes sense why amos euins said what he said. the sun was likely shining upon oswald’s head making the rest less visible and making it appear bald or something similar
When I read this I thought back to SpongeBob when all the fish shout ‘bald, bald’
lol lol
I think he saw a bald spot.
@@callumvantriet2941 What I thought too.
I’ve seen dozens of JFK docs and somehow, this felt completely fresh. You’re a great storyteller and the use of scope (pun not intended) was perfect.
Im amongus
👍
Did you see the docs that got declassified by Biden last week? Very interesting connections to Israel
Meh. This felt disappointing. LEM seems to have abided by the official narrative or simply did Wikipedia levels of research… prettt sad considering his platform he could’ve really brought people the truth
It’s just more infotainment but it sure look pretty huh
@@CoercedJabyou make a fucking video on it then
He’s finally back from the dead with another incredible video, I’m so goddamn happy.
He’s such a good story teller
@@JokeswithMitochondria was curious about ur username so cIicked on ur profiIe. Wasn’t disappointed lmao
yall didn't even have time to watch it yet lol
he usually uploads once a year so it's not out of the blue. each documentary is extremely professional and he has to singlehandedly research it, edit it and compose music for it
That was literally my exact same thought
When the Las Vegas shooter opened fire, police got calls to various other hotels in the Las Vegas area and reports were put over the radio of multiple shooters or a lone shooter in those buildings instead of Mandalay Bay. People who've never heard gunshots in their life are quick to underestimate how powerfully they can reflect off buildings
3 months ago today (May 15th 2024) the Slovakian Prime Minister, Robert Fico, was shot. The TV crews interviewed a first hand witness, a middle-aged woman called Lubica Valkova. She can be seen in the video of the shooting, no more than 5 yards away from the gunman as he fired his 5 shots. She was asked, "How many shots did you hear?". She immediately answered, "I heard 3 shots.". It's all on youtube.
In general, people are not reliable witnesses, especially in traumatic situations.
This statement you've incorrectly made is in fact 100% terrible misinformation!
I'll attempt to explain some basics which anyone who has never spent a day in a major Las Vegas Strip hotel can't possibly process or understand...
As a person who spent so much time in Las Vegas for 20 years, and has walked and moved though these hotels thousands of times, I'll say this... In every single hotel where 'shots fired' were reported, I know for a fact you can't possibly hear gunshots from inside any of the others. So, for example... if gunshots were actually happening at Mandalay Bay you'd NEVER hear it almost 2 miles away while INSIDE of Planet Hollywood or Bellagio (these are where some of the other shootings were reported and the pl witnesses were specifically hearing the shots INSIDE those locations) - no matter how you slice it, you would not hear any shots if you were located INSIDE any of the other locations. To be fair I'll add it's barely but remotely possible with insanely specific exceptions for the places right next to one another under absolute perfect conditions. But these rare scenarios are not what was reported by people INSIDE these other hotels.
Mandalay Bay is basically at the south end of the major Las Vega Strip. Luxor is just across the street yet guests at Luxor didn't even hear shots... But on the other hand Mandalay Bay is about 1.7 miles from Bellagio and Planet Hollywood, the latter two being basically just across the Strip from each other. Meaning across the LAS VEGAS STRIP. It doesn't matter, nobody would hear unless the shots were fired within fairly close proximity with respect to the enormous size of these places. Even then it wouldn't be clear because there's loud music outside at the Bellagio fountain, people walking around talking and crazy nonstop driving, police, ambulances going to pickup people who got too high or drunk and foot traffic on the Strip. INSIDE these massive casinos there's gambling machines, restaurants, shops, people screaming on the craps tables, live music and headliner shows of all kinds going in multiple rooms. All these major casinos also have Ballroom / Conference Areas where weddings, award ceremonies and parties are active with their own music and sound systems and these areas alone are HUGE in their own right, usually pretty isolated from Casino floor and hotel areas for privacy. Even Hotel and Casino areas are almost always set apart from another so hotel guests can rest without hearing all the action happening down on the casino floor. Mandalay Bay actually has two different hotels on the property and many outsiders are unaware. The other more upscale hotel is now called "W Las Vegas", but was formerly renamed "Delano" and "The Hotel" before that. So it's very important to factor in these things.
So, I see this phony narrative is everywhere but it's complete nonsense, obviously assumptions made up by people who've likely never witnessed the magnitude of these mega-sized hotels. I even had friends in a band at Mandalay DURING THE SHOOTING and they heard NOTHING even though the shooter was upstairs in the hotel, they were near the casino floor. In reality, that's just how disconnected and distant everything is in these big hotels. My friends in the band were all grabbed by security and taken into a "safe room". They told me they had no idea anyone was shooting anything which makes total sense to anyone who's been in MB a few times. It's just not possible if you understand how huge and loud these casinos and hotels really are and how they're physical laid out. Sound science and physics don't work that way.
The undeniable truth is the fact there were multiple shootings in all those hotels at the same time and it's all been covered up. They also found a bomb in a car parked at Luxor in the parking garage. Las Vegas Metro has that on record even though most people never even heard about it... If you don't know these things that's ok. But please stop creating these senseless narratives. People are still confused enough to this day. Answers from officials were never fully provided. One of the biggest cover ups of all time in my opinion.
Random Reference for context: Ask yourself.... why did not one single Texas School Book Depository employee who was downstairs eating run up to the 6th floor to find JFK assassin's/ shooters? Maybe that's too obvious on another level but OK... then at least ask "why", when all the employees who were in the same building downstairs eating lunch were questioned they never even knew any shots were happening upstairs. They were listening to the radio and eating. The simple answer is the physics of sound aren't what people think. Now just imagine any modern major Las Vegas Strip Casino dwarfs that building dozens of times over.
I hope this clarifies things a bit more for people to comprehend there were in fact simultaneous, multiple shootings and events that day... "WHY" has never been answered.
This video made me think how cool a detective game would be where you try to solve an old mystery based on unreliable eyewitness testimonies and you have to piece together the true story of what happened
Disco Elysium.
- LA Noire
- Shadows of Doubt
Both great detective games.
Return of the Obra Dinn
Disco Elysium for something more serious, Ace Attorney for something more lighthearted
The Kentucky Fried Movie has a parody about that exact game about this exact event.
"You found a patsy! You have that patsy conveniently killed!"
Oh wait, it wasn't about solving the murder, it was about running the conspiracy.
This is significantly better than any documentary aired on TV. You have some serious talent, brother!
Yet, the companies producing the TV documentaries would categorize Lemmino, as one of those lone Conspiracy Theorist with no degree in a journalism, no peer review, and no editorial funding for his project. Crazy how they’ve been losing viewership, money, and public trust for the past decade and a half.
To be honest it's not hard to make things that are better than contemporary TV programming. As you said, all you need is a bit of talent, experience and know how, and some way to fund it. Moren TV is pretty poor in quality compared to what you can find from independent content creators or small teams of people on the internet nowadays.
you havent watched Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy theroy, about this. he is ex navy seal team leader, marksman, he tried to make the shots with the same gun.
he failed greatly. HE explained its impossible to do this with one gunman.
The paradigm has shifted. A lot of talented people on youtube. Very few talented people on television.
@@Mr.Marketing Conspiracy theorist = Close to the truth. Hence the label.
This has to be one of the best TH-cam videos ever made. Long form and absolutely packed with content, references, top-tier visual effects, sources, and a level headed approach to conclusions. You guys have really knocked it out of the park with this one. Brilliant work to everybody involved.
it's about 1/8th of the total context surrounding the incident, so, take that for what it's worth. It's great, but could be expanded to 10 hours with still no conclusive answer
In the Zapruder film Kenney appearing after passing from behind a billboard is inclining his head forwards looking down, so he had been hit. Otherwise he would have kept looking at the public. Then suddenly his head is violently yanked backwards, hit from the front.
@dootie8285level headed is acknowledging probability of incidents and making conclusion based on what's known, not just making up stuff because it feels like it 'fits', a process that's completely ignored by most self-proclaimed 'researchers' and 'conspiracy theorists'
It's totally wrong mate, what you on about! The FBI killed JFK. It's written. We have the proof! Time to buckle up and realise your heads of state don't want you to have any freedom
Meh...
Truly incredible work! I’ve never seen anything like this nor the reconstruction of the scene or building. Fantastic work!
You deserve your own production company man. Have never seen such a well laid out and easy to follow video on the subject.
I really want that to happen too.
too high quality for yt
@@JokeswithMitochondriayt made him filthy rich 😂
Yt is better than a production company. He has almost zero overhead. This IS the perfect business 😂
Wendigoon explains it with just a white board. There is a video by someone named Nix that the CIA "lost" that had the better angle of the grassy mole.
Just when I didn’t think you could possibly meet the standard of the Jack the Ripper film… wow. Excellent work, as always.
I was Jack the Ripper, trust me bro, trust me
@@comtruise402Literally me frfr
Jack the Ripper is my "favourite" case - I'm saving his video on it until this weekend. One factor it has in common with JFK is the ambiguity of both witness statements and physical evidence.
This video seems like a even more detailed then the Jack The Ripper video
This is, arguably, better than television, and half of the modern high production documentaries. Great job
there is no arguement, it is better
@PickUps It's nice to now Lemmino still gets these similar compliments for several of his famous past works and this, as well. Very deserved.
Indeed.
Just goes to show how dumbed down modern TV is..
This type of documentary was the norm about 20years ago..
Not now all fake reality, cooking, property, and mindless X factor/singing competitions.
All worthy to their audience but I like to learn something..
And I did.
The third shooter? most likely sound reflecting of the book suppository building.
While a lot of work was put into this, I think it’s much more “simpler” than a modern documentary, meaning it’s much more to the point and without distracting cuts, fades, interview splices and music. All the graphics are excellent and designed to help us understand, not impress us with its “incredible cutting edge CGI blah blah.” It’s simpler, meaning I can actually understand what’s going on. And that is SO much better in every respect.
@@mariecarie1 Yes, I had thought the same thing watching another of his videos - i.e. "Gosh I can understand this thanks to the graphics he's done".
This got to be THE best docu on this subject ever. Thank you very much
I was a 10 year old kid on Nov 22, 1963 and the events of that day and those that immediately followed have stuck with me ever since. I have read every decent book (and some a bit far fetched), watched every documentary and movie, collected magazines and newspapers, etc. I must say this is one of the very best minute by minute accounts of that day I have ever seen. Your graphics are amazing and your in depth explanation is spot on. Thank you for pulling this together. I hope you do more on this subject.
I’m similar is the sense of 9/11. Similar age (13 years old) and consumed a lot of my life (dad deployed shortly after, then I joined infantry and also deployed). Suffice to say, it’s curious how world events can seriously influence one’s trajectory and life.
So in your opinion. Who do you think did it?
almost 70 wow
70 years old, damn what a thing it must've been to see the internet and vr and cellphones come to be.
@@dkiller6060I remember how impressed I was when caller id happened! Transistor radios? Imagine that you could unplug from a radio and listen to music while riding your bike, WoW. Dick Tracy watches with little tvs on them! Of course that was impossible! I was born in 1951, and went to elementary school in Texas. One child's parents divorced in my first grade class, only one out of 30. it was the first time I heard the word. I didn't hear the word shit until 6th grade, and a year later the f word. interesting life span for sure.
It should be noted that someone's testimony being consistent doesn't necessarily make them any more reliable than a more inconsistent person. They can be consistently wrong.
What if the witnesses reported that their testimonies had been altered and the notorized signatures faked? Because that's exactly what Julie Ann Mercer (as well as a host of others) claimed when Mark Lane began interviewing them in 1964.
Crazy how it took almost 5 years for the narrative to come together. They arrested LHO in hours, he was dead in days & 70 years later the story still isn't straight.
Anyone with a brain (no pun intended) can tell from ballistic images that the entrance wound is in the front of his head, not the back. Exit wound in the back. Opposite direction of the depository. Makes no sense.
Two wrong doesn't make a right.
@@digojez No. But if the court discovers evidence has been tampered with by the police/FBI (a Federal crime) the case collapses and Oswald walks.
@@deaddropholiday correct. Oswald was the fall guy. That's why he was killed. They couldn't let it get to trial because everyone would realize he was innocent and then they would start questioning why the government was so hard pressed to prosecute an innocent man. With their unbounded resources, they should've known (because they did) that Oswald wasn't their guy. All of the evidence was "tampered" with so badly because it was all planted.
Worth the wait. One of the best documentary channels I have ever watched, and LEMMiNO continues to live up to the sky-high standards he has set for himself and more. Bravo once more.
Hell yeah!
Let's be honest a year wait for my favorite TH-camr to put out a single video is ridiculous tho
Jack ruby short for jack rubenstien
@@evilcrabking it’s definitely not when you consider that he has to research, write the script, edit the video and make sure that there are no mistakes in his videos. I find the amount of work he has to put in actually comparable to a thesis where you similarly have to spend a lot of time on the same subject. Also you have to keep in mind that there will be ups and downs during the whole process, increasing the time spent on the project. And I think I prefer having to wait than having mediocre videos be put out.
ok
8:14 hes truly timeless
lmfao
There is nothing like your channel and your videos. You are an inspiration to every creator on this platform.
Much love from Brazil!
Lemme introduce to you Barely Sociable
If you are into guns or video gamed Ahoy makes really good videos kinda like these
@@Rwhaleyiiahoy?
bro actually got taken to brazil 💀💀💀 (jk)
@@Rwhaleyii Yea
I love the modern TH-cam take on documentaries. No dramatic music, no weird nonsense interviews with "experts", no b-side camera shots. Just plain information.
this is exactly why i prefer youtube documentaries over netflix documentaries of the same topics
As documentaries used to be, before the 90s. It's a refreshing resurgence.
Honestly i hate modern documentaries they try to make into a show. Even the “experts” are acting. I remember seeing a documentary about a murder case and two “officers” saw the “suspect” and the officers were saying they were scared. But the tone in their voice did not reflect that. The acting was so bad that I was cringing. And of course everything shown is all just a studio set. And what I hate more is when they try to give the backstory of the officers/expert. And this backstory is usually irrelevant things such as their childhood or what they like to do as a hobby. I hate how they try to make it about the people on their not the case. Then I watched a much older documentary and generally the narrator gives facts about the case or if they talk to experts the normally talk about what was going on through during the case. They never did any acting. And if there was a backstory they mostly talked about their credentials and they usually kept it brief. There were was no backstory about their daily lives or their childhood. In addition the only acting they ever did was for re-enactments but that’s about it. It was usually very minimal.
No shitty ghost shifted re-enactors
Glad we still have creators like you that can tell story’s that are so in-depth and interesting
Babe wake up lemmino uploaded
Jack ruby short for jack rubenstien
@@athejbaka7084Ok
I love this channel, man the production value is insane ❤
My biggest takeaway from this fantastic documentary is that people REALLY didn't like Arnold Rowland. He took more strays than Kennedy did in this film!
For real, if I was him and heard that interview his wife had... Man...
To be fair, the Rashomon Effect seems to have affected almost all the witnesses. It’s odd that the first 3 witnesses including his wife all disagreed regarding luggage/curtain rod box, etc.
@@myopiczeal I mean, you're not wrong. We also only have that on the authority of two people. It's just jokes anyway
“Black man” was in brackets during his 25:50 quote, which means he likely used a more derogatory term.
I wouldn’t like him either lol.
@@jessramirez1737ALL his references to black man were in brackets. The guy was likely a real racist jerk, even by Dallas ‘63 standards.
The 3d graphics are so impressive! The lines where people walked cleared up everything in my mind! And thank you so much for cc! I can't hear well and seeing the words lets me relax. The music was also amazing! Very chilling and fitting. Please keep doing what you do!
I always thought that if I ever got interviewed by police and could't recall something correctly, I would immediately be assumed to be the one who did it. But this just shows how normal it is to not recall things that happened in such a chaotic manner correctly.
And people who think like that make shit up on the spot and make things more complicated.
Depends if they have preconceived judgement or not
If they don't like you and you can't remember, they might be looking for evidence to convict rather than if they have the right person
If it's some sweet clueless dame, they'll swoon, and move on
It’s very difficult to reconstruct a scene based solely off of testimony, because everyone is biased, making it only natural to have conflicting testimonies. On top of that, those people were living their regular lives on a regular day, and no one is actually fully aware of their surroundings when going through a normal work day.
Besides, when you hear gunfire, your immediate reaction is to run or flee from that location into safety, and you are definitely not paying attention as to who fired it or even possible suspects. You just want to save your life from potential danger, and the adrenaline rush can make you see or hear things that aren’t actually there or aren’t exactly as you remember.
The fact that there were fingerprints from Lee Oswald on those shells, that he owned the very rifle from which the bullets were fired, that he ran away from the police and tried to sneak up into that theater to hide, as well as the very suspicious curtain rods story, surely points to him as being the assassin. However, due to the precarious handling of evidence and the failure to ensure Oswald’s continuous interrogation (allowing him to be shot dead) makes it impossible to find if he truly acted alone.
@@BelchiorFelipe Makes it likely he fired shells (not even definitive but likely), but sole shooter or assassin, much much less of a guarantee
I've been on a rewatch kick of everything you've ever posted on your channel.. and it's amazing to see how you've evolved from a "TH-camr", to a proper filmmaker. 🏆👌
I love how seemingly honest these interviewees are. The wife straight up calls out her husband for being kind of a bullshitter who makes up stories to make himself sound smarter.
they talk like robots lol. After an assassination like that. These people wouldn't be so calm. Is that the actual audio or a dub Lem put over it?
@@shadydealz It says in the video that the audio is by voice actors, not the actual recordings
Not the actual interviews.That casts doubt on the entire video.
@@johnwright7895 They ARE the actual interviews. Every single quote is referenced in the document pinned to the top of this comments section by LEMMiNO. You can trace every quote back to its source. Every single word is authentic.
Obstructing justice is a serious crime. I’m sure they were all coached beforehand on being as honest and matter-of-fact as they could be.
Man, the editing and graphics on this video are truly on another level. I can't imagine how much work and time this must have taken.
For at least a whole year.💀
He had rebuilt the script for this video in November of last year.
I’m gonna go ahead and guess a year, based on how long he hasn’t uploaded for
@@Seb.draws.thingsbro your art is insane
@@UnnamedAgar hey thanks man that means a lot ❤️ just started this channel up a few months ago
The worst part about watching LEMMiNO videos is that you can't watch anything that can match this level of quality after!
eh there’s a few channels
@@6z0 name em
@@Robbie-mw5uuMelodySheep is one
@@Robbie-mw5uuneo
Why files
I already saw this twice this last year, and I am heading in for number 3. Woooo!
This is kind of scary. Think there are thousands of people that have been sent to prison over the years based solely on witness statements and look how wildly inconsistent all these witnesses statements are in this case.
*_@mikelindner2646_* Yes scary. But it's even worse than you say. Police corruption is not unknown. Take a look at a documentary movie called, The Thin Blue Line (1988).
Every person will have a different story or experience for the same incident.
@@williamwells8672and it’s not necessarily their fault. People, when under pressure, will go back in their brains and look for details and come to conclusions that aren’t true or accurate to the actual truth.
Cops know if all witnesses give exactly the same story, that they are all lying lol.
I didn't get chosen for jury duty once because I stated I wouldn't convict someone if the only evidence presented was a single witnesses testimony.
That's terrifying to me, the fact that a DA would even go to court with that is insane.
Your videos are like rare gems, few but so precious. This will brighten up my week for sure! ♥
Thanks for keeping quality over quantity alive on this platform
Que te pasó?
ok
Quality over quantity is nothing but true for his channel
@@haroldberserker lemmino had to completely move apartments and then he had some stuff come up in his life and then I believe he got sick during the making of this video. So that is why it took almost 2 years even though the actual quality of video is only like maybe 1 year worth of quality, because he had a bunch of stuff in his life come up and he had to stop making the video, but instead of rushing the video to make up for the time he lost when moving apartments and sick and other stuff, he decided to just keep working on it like normal.
Wendigoon explains it with just a white board. There is a video by someone named Nix that the CIA "lost" that had the better angle of the grassy mole.
Honestly, I've never found the JFK assassination that fascinating, but this was so well put together that it's peaked an interest. The visual layout really gave me a great sense of what was going on with the witness statements in terms of who was doing what, where and when and how all these contradictions in statements have come about. Fantastic voice actors too, their accents fit so nicely that I kind of forgot they were voice actors. Just incredible production values all-round and I really appreciate the presence of citations on-screen as well.
I wish I could say the same. It got pretty stale to me about 45 minutes in. Way too monotonous and boring listening to every single testimony lol
Piqued, not peaked
The CIA stuff is fascinating to me. This saga includes them coming to Kennedy with a plan to attack Miami (kill people) and blame it on the Cubans (I'll just say "fake 🏳️" because I'm afraid.. another example is the Gulf of Tonkin but that's a tame one) The president shut this down.. then he died. I wouldn't bet a dime on any of the other conspiracy theories but this whole vein is legitimate/concrete so it's not really even the same thing. There's no illuminati/satanists, it's just money and without us having a close eye on them they'll do absolutely evil things to get more. It's way out of control and it should be obvious.
@@sfdntk
Wendigoon explains it with just a white board. There is a video by someone named Nix that the CIA "lost" that had the better angle of the grassy mole.
Incredibly well made! Earned a sub, Wow!
I absolutely love the amount of time and effort put into the visual element of each of your videos, you have done such a great job at that!
Lemmings
Hi
Beep bop... I'm the Philosophy Bot. Here, have a quote:
"The struggle itself towards the heights is enough to fill a man's heart. One must imagine Sisyphus happy"
~ Albert Camus
No wonder why Lemmino is not uploading for a year.
The amount of work that has put into this is insane, and it's one and a half hours worth of content as well.
well worth it
@@JokeswithMitochondria i was curious about ur usernamee so cIicked on ur profiIe. Wasn't disappointed lmao
Been thinking recently that when he didn't upload in a year, I knew the next video's gonna be a banger.
🤖
@@emilianozamora399 😶
The Russians thinking the Cubans did it, the Cubans thinking the CIA did it, the CIA thinking maybe they did do it but if they didn’t it was probably the Russians who did it.
Oswald can’t believe he’s not getting the credit for this.
group projects in a nutshell
Literally every person in the empire has a reason to assassinate the emperor. Wild thought. 😊 It was probably the sea people.
@@inktendo1018lmao bruh 😢
Then why did he say he was a patsy?
Robert Caro reports the Russians believed Lyndon Johnson was responsible.
Thanks!
When we needed him the most, he returned with another masterpiece. Now it's time to binge all the videos again. It's a tradition at this point
Kennedy was killed by the CIA
No joke. Almost everything he’s ever made (I mean all the mini-documentaries) have infinite replay value.
@@motopolak sh t even those from his Top 10 Facts days have incredible replay value.
@ so true
This video is offensive. JFK's death was a tragedy for America and to generate revenue from the ads on this video is abhorrent
Amos Euins focusing on that bald spot like he owed it money bro
It was his biggest impression so of course he's gonna say it like it was, bro.
I laughed my ass off when he interrupts the cop and is like "spot... yeah"
You probably resent him indicating it was Mr. O
@@peterfraser9070 I dont think Euins did indicate it was Mr O. In fact the bald spot suggests it wasnt Oswald. Originally Euins said he thought the man in the window was black. This changed to him being unsure as to whether the man was black or white. I think it is more interesting when he talls how the cop he was talking to received a call saying a man ran out the back of the TSBD....seemed to be ignored
Well, there's tons of evidence that says it's quite unbelievable that it wasn't Oswald in that window. Anyone claiming it wasn't him has a lot of explaining to do to be taken seriously. Care to try to explain the evidence away?
Euins saying the sun was shining on a "bald spot" in reality does not rule Oswald out at all. There's footage of Oswald with a bright light shining on his head for a moment and his hair was so thin you could see his skin clear as day. It is very easy to imagine Euins seeing the same thing with the sun shining on Oswald's head.
Euins did not first say the man was black, by the way; that was a radio interviewer mis-quoting Euins. Euins clarified that he was not sure about the man's skin colour; he'd only seen him briefly and there was a glare on the window.
This has to be the gold standard of documentary on any platform. Hats off to lemmino for amazing story telling
Quality > Quantity.
U commented 25 mins ago when the vid was posted an hour ago u prob said this before even watching 🥱
Jack ruby short for jack rubenstien
Its really not that well researched, well put together by the team? For sure. There is a lot missing, and that he managed to miss so much in such a long video is kind of an achievment in itself.
@@Wunsci What were some of the main points missed, if you don't mind telling me? I thought this was a nice video, but also wondered how much more there was to cover. I don't know much of the details to this event. Really curious about it though.