Most of people continue ignoring space missions and universe exploration. Imagine if everybody would put their own effort in these objectives, mankind would be very technologically advanced
@@tyreemitchell5174 That's the point Mitchell. Don't you think if they were faking it they would remember to put the stars in? (You don't really think that they CAN'T fake stars, do you?) --- Put some minimal effort into researching 'photography exposure'. It's a really, really simple factual concept. All you have to do is look it up. --- you can reproduce it with your own cell phone. Go outside at night and look up and see the stars. Now stand next to any remotely lit object like this white Dragon capsule, and take a picture of yourself and see if there are any stars in YOUR picture. There won't be. The camera exposure is designed to pick up the subject in the foreground of the photograph. The subject in the foreground is well-lit enough that the aperture on the camera is only open a short amount of time. And when the aperture on the camera is only open a short amount of time, it's not open long enough to pick up dimly-lit things in the background, like the pinpricks of light that stars are. ---- Of course, that is for 'still' cameras. Video cameras like this one are designed to utilize the correct exposure for the thing in the foreground that it's recording. The video camera's automatic exposure is NOT set for recording the things in the background that are dim.
Born in 61 and remember as a young child sitting in front of t.v. watching all missions. Fascinating watching this that we can keep progressing in our space ventures. I congratulate elon musk and EVERYONE involved. You are ALL true pioneers .😊
Bs. Still no stars in the background?! Just dark background! Whoever is recording the docking can not record the earth and space? BS ALWAYS. Elon you’re bs too now
Not only the docking is autonomous, but also all the mission is, which includes ascending, orbiting, first engine's landing procedure(reorienting, entry stuff, landing), "of course i still love you"s route, ect.
@@camtjies_9716 Yeah I took it for granted when I was young. I was a child during the Apollo program. And we could see every launch. FROM OUR HOUSE. I think because I was a child it never occurred to me that everybody couldn't see the launch from their house. And I mean everybody on the planet. -- In my twenties, during the shuttle program, I happen to live in the same town as NASA. And of course I could see the launches from my house then too. But I could also get in my car and drive 10 or 15 minutes and be REALLY close. ---- it was awesome. And I love the space program. And I'm more grateful, now that I'm older, of the childhood I was privileged to have. I didn't realize then how lucky I was.
@@kathleenr4047 Same for me I used to live in the North Pole, and every Christmas Eve I was watching Santa in his sleigh with his Dears Departing to go around the World and bring all those Gifts to the Children who Deserved it. Still so Gratefull for this Unique Privilege. I din't realized that children were sleeping when he was going around, and I was AWAKE to see him Leaving. Justice is not of this World.
mike gallimore The main reason why they don't want to spend billions on solving world problems is because all the money is being spent on military/wars which only makes the problems worse.
Truly awesome to see. Been watching since lift off yesterday. Incredible achievement. Great to see the USA launching again from the Cape with their own Spacecraft. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
I always think of the flower waltz when I see docking. I dont know if its because of stanley kubrick or because the waltz fits so well in a weightlessness
@@rafickilewis8185 I mean... They are on a orbit, basically they are falling without reaching the point, basically having an infinite fall, so ofc the speed is high
Imagine the calculations and the physical tools and machines required to make all of that happen. To be able to launch, find the space station, match speeds and then dock as if both bodies appear to be almost motionless. What a fantastic achievement.
Actually, there were no touch screens, hi-resolution monitors, microprocessors, large capacity memory, no graphic capability. Apollo used relays and switches, some integrated circuity, but sill in its infancy, along with the first suitcased sized computer on the planet, and it all worked just fine. Since then The miniaturization of transistors down to the nanometer has given current technology the ability to use those fancy touch screens and storage and processing capabilities.
Thanks for the video. I planned on watching the docking at the predicted time of 10:29am Eastern, but they docked about a dozen minutes early, so I missed it.
Imagine setting up future space stations orbiting different planets in the future that you can transfer between. But idk if its possible to dock an interplanetary spacecraft on a station like that because it would probably be much larger.
About 28000 km/h relative to earth. But in what way to you expet to see it here? You have absolute no reference in the background. So it could be also 28 km/h or 2800000000 km/h and would look the same.
What a bummer leaving this modern masterpiece and going into that old tin can masterpiece.... Now musk should launch a fleet of these that would interconnect and create a new cool Touchscreen enabled Sci-Fi style station!
Don't be too exicited by the new delicate touch screen and cosmetic touch of SpaceX. Space is a dangerous place to be and the rigged ISS works well for now.
@@alberthenriette8976 i think you meant to say rugged but got auto corrected to rigged? I'm not excited about the touch screen itself, more about the simplistic controls. Besides touch screens are pretty robust and i bet they have redundancy.
There were several dockings and undockings in Apollo - once when the CSM had to turn around and dock with the LM and pull it out of the third stage, then when the LM left for the moon and then the upper stage of the LM separated from the landing stage and returned back from the moon to dock with the CSM. Then when the LM was ditched before departing the moon and finally when the command and service modules were explosively separated just before reentry.
Kind of done all this 50 years ago oh and landed on the sodding moon and returned without any fatalities 5 times!!! This should have been a video of a docking to a MARS space station.
Certainly not the first automated docking, but it sure was smooth and accurate. All of this automation opens the door to getting more real scientists to the space station and less test pilots.
I don't understand, if someone could explain, if the ISS is orbiting the earth constantly, how come they can slowly move Dragon and manage to dock it to the ISS while it is oribiting???????
It only looks slow because bot objects are flying at relatively the same speed and there is no other object to give a reference for the speed. The ISS circles the earth every 90 minutes at 17,500 mph. If you notice the speed on dragon yesterday during its flight into space, it reached over 22,000 mph.
I think you are pulling our legs. No need to answer you, You already know the answer, playing a little bit of games, OK, got a little thrill down your leg by Chris Matthews now?
Caustic Chameleon and you want me believe they docked in that speed? If the spacecraft has 22000 mikes speed imagine how far up it would go within 15 minutes. I don't buy this CGI space show
Imagine, the speed of them relative to each other looks so slow but relative to earth, the speed is heck fast. Technology really have gone so far. Just hundred years ago we don't even have efficient communication then now we're combining objects in the orbit.
I love how the media plays up the 17,000 mph orbital speed relative to the earth when what really matters is the relative speed between the space station and the space capsule. For the rest of their lives most news reporters will be scratching their heads over this, because you don’t take physics in journalism school, you party and use drugs for four years and then They hand you a token journalism degree, so it happened at my college, the engineer and students were studying, your truly included, and the journalism students were partying like mad.
17k speed around the earth, but 2mph relative to the space station. It’s why you can be doing 90 on the highway but moving only 1mph faster than the car next to you.
@@steveperreira5850 🤣🤣seriously bro.. I can clearly relate with my university too, The mass communication department is next to our dept 'Biotech', in our first sem one of my classmates left our dept and joined them as he saw them enjoying and When later when I asked him how it was there , one should have seen his emotions, 🤣🤣🤣
I assume you mean music. --- real space flight doesn't need background music. And the reason I know this is, there's a great shuttle launch video online where the guy added background music. And the most common complaint is that the music is annoying it distracts from the awesomeness of the video. And he even comments at one point and agrees that he's going take out the music and repost the video. ---. I'll send you a link if you're interested.
@@HomebrandFishfood 👍 That is true, you CAN contact the International Space Station with a ham radio. But BE AWARE! IF you contact the ISS with a ham radio, it will STILL not leave a trail of light. --- just sayin'
How much light does your camera need to see by? Fancy cameras can adjust sensitivity by opening and closing the aperture that lets in the light. Human eyes do the same thing, automatically, all the time, by dilating and contracting their pupils. If you're a sighted person walking from a brightly lit to a dark outdoor area, you won't see stars in the sky either, at least not right away. As your eyes dial up their sensitivity by opening up your pupils, you slowly notice fainter and fainter stars. Most space cameras actually can't adjust their aperture in this way. Instead, scientists predict the light levels that a camera will encounter through its mission, and design their instruments to have an aperture that's an appropriate size for the range of targets they expect to encounter. This can be a challenge if your spacecraft will encounter a wide range of target brightnesses, but you make your camera to work on the intended science targets and don't worry if it isn't ideal for any fun extras you may photograph along the way. From a quick search...questions? Stop looking for fallacies. This is actually happening.
Absolutely incredible, that being said... the Dragon had a nose/cone camera, would have been nice to watch from that head on angle as it connected with the ISS. Houston were tuned into that camera when Chris was organizing the hatch to be opened, he even waved into it. Curious why they wouldn't show that camera on the above video.
The sun is bouncing off the space ship and blinding the camera to any other lights in space. As for the speed, the objects are flying at relatively the same speed and there is no other object in sight to get a comparison so it only looks slow. Think of it like you and a friend sitting in a cars traveling beside each other at 55 mph. You reach out to each other slowly to pass something. Now imagine it with now wind resistance and in an almost completely dark tunnel and another friend is filming it. The pass off would look slow as there is nothing externally that is stationary in the frame to actually show the speed at which you are traveling.
You are a provocateur, you can’t possibly be this stupid, you should get back to your college homework. ..... oh I forgot, no college, fake pandemic closes Colleges, and they will give you a fake degree anyway. Everyone of you snowflakes gets a fake degree. That’s the real fake stuff you pigeon brain.
Honest question. How come we can't see any stars? We can see them from earth at night but not here. Is it being washed out from all the light being reflected from the earth?
They're too faint in relation to the light reflected off the ISS/Dragon to be picked up. The camera adjusts it's sensitivity to light to ensure the object in focus is not too dim nor too bright and washed out. If the camera adjusted to capture the stars, the ISS/Dragon would just be bright white glaring objects in the image. Same reason that when you take a photo of a person in front of a sunset, you get a silhouette and no details of their face.
Dustin Murray --- Sam Horton is correct.--- They are not washed out because of the light reflected by the Earth. The stars are being washed out because the camera is designed for the correct exposure for the thing in the foreground. Which is the Dragon capsule. It's automatically set for the right exposure to film The Dragon capsule in the foreground and that exposure is not enough to pick up the dim stars, way in the background.
Can someone explain we can easily see plenty of stars from earth at night however pitch black for the Falcon 9 Dragon docking to Iss surely be some stars 400kms up. 🤔🤔
The focus and light exposure of the camera doesnt show the stars. You can try this yourself. Take a photo of a fully lit building during the night with the sky as a background. Result will only show the building with no stars.
1. How does the crew Dragon know where the station is? 2. Who's filming? I kind of know answers to both of these questions but I'm not sure so that's why I'm asking
The dragon capsule is fully autonomous so its flight computers do everything from catching up to the station to the entire docking process, and they are using remotely operated cameras on the outside of the station
Thanks for sharing. I had the opporunity to witness a rocket launch in 2018. Memorable experience. I uploaded a pretty solid clip of the experience on my channel.
Weightlessness is achieved by flying G-FORCE ONE through a parabolic flight maneuver. Specially trained pilots fly these maneuvers between approximately 24,000 and 34,000 feet altitude. ... Next the plane is "pushed over" the top to begin the zero-gravity segment of the parabola
Just because you don't understand orbital mechanics, it doesn't mean it's fake. You honestly have no no clue how ignorant and idiotic y'all sound, do you? I was going to say, "child-like", but then I remembered that children have the capacity to assimilate new information and make logical sense of it; something you Flat Earthers seem to have somehow lost along the way. Tell me, was it blunt force trauma? Stroke? Oxygen deprivation, perhaps? Edit: Somehow managed to misspell 'something' as 'comething'. Fixed.
*Stupid Question* Does the capsule move both forward and sideways to match with the speed and rotation of the ISS while docking ? it all looks stationary in this video .
We are all lucky to witness the very first flight of a new era of commercial space travel into earth lower orbit. All of that thanks to a visionary man called Elon Musk. Soon travelling to the Moon will become a simple commodity
The capsule also moves with 7.6 km/h. Everything in orbit moves with that speed. It is the purpose of a rocket to accelerate things up to that speed, because that is the necessary speed so that they stay in orbit and not fall down. It would be a bad a idea to stop the ISS, because then the capsoule would slam into the ISS with 7.6 km/s :-) And the ISS would fall straight down to earth if it doesn't move anymore.
Where would the camera have to be? The best shot would be from far away. Probably not connected to the Space Station at all. How would that be possible? A remote satellite that travels with the Space Station but is not physically connected to it? Seems like that would be very difficult to achieve for a long time. Perhaps something like that could be launched from the space station and then retrieved periodically. But at what cost and what benefit compared to the cost? Probably better things to spend $$ on.
@@ethancurtin7486 the ISS is moving relative to the earth at 18,000 mph, but here we are seeing both ships moving at the same speed and without any reference points there seems to be no movement
joeskis for someone like elon he should be proud for what he is doing because no matter if it’s been done before it’s still a step towards going further through space
@@TheGameCamer360 A rocket booster that is able to launch and land back safely to be re-used whilst delivering humans to space.... no its not been done before.
It is great to see the good news here and we can give credit to private enterprise, and even to President Barack Obama, because he canceled the ridiculously over cost NASA program to bring astronauts to the space station, and furthermore, Obama made it a private competition. Rather surprising for a guy who is pretty much a socialist, I mean Obama here, but I consider it one of the very few real accomplishments of his eight year administration.
@@tyreemitchell5174 you never see stars on cameras. They are too dim for most camera sensors to pick up, if you boosted up the brightness enough to see stars the main object on view (spacecraft) would be overwhelmingly bright.
@@tyreemitchell5174 That's because you haven't got a clue. Because it's beyond your limitations you sneer at it. Quite a normal reaction from someone with a hillbilly IQ.
Love Muss B --- If your Missus does this with the car, I hope you are appreciative and grateful. You realize what the alternative is, right? Do you want her to do it fast? Or do you want her to do it collision-free? --- You're not realizing the slow-parking gift you've been given.
Soooo cool! Thanks for this. I worry about COVID... I would think that they have done everything to ensure that the Dragon capsule and 'em astronauts are COVID-free...
Nikki Taylor if you ever seen a video debunking the moon landing conspiracies, the stars are not in the photo because the camera needs time to capture that light.
It’s because the camera isn’t set to see the stars, if it wanted to see the stars it’d have to capture more light and the crew dragon would be over saturated, the point is seeing the crew dragon, not the stars.
-Cooper, What are you Doing?
-Docking.
This is no time for caution !
@@arisconstantinou no its necessary
On the way down I hope there’s no “need to shed weight I agreed 90%”
"The Rotation is 67-68 RPM!"
*intense theme plays*
COME ON TARS
Lol
LOOOL!!!
@@kgosimookodithemechanicale2988 Laughing Out Out Out Loud
Interstellar black hole was crap.
Initiating spin😊😊😊
I am so glad my sons and I were able to watch this launch yesterday and dock with iss today. Watching history unfold in front of our eyes.
Edward Hill cross our fingers that well be able to witness another moon landing in our lifetime like our parents.
pay your taxes
@@Puppy_PuppingtonThere’s the Artemis program! Moon landing in 2024
i've been watching space flights since Gemini. We used to watch launches and recoveries on TV at school. Still a thrill. Way to go Space-X!!!!!
Houston: Dragon what are you doing?
Dragon: Docking
I watched it with the song hahahahaa
At least they didn't have to initiate spin...
Most of people continue ignoring space missions and universe exploration. Imagine if everybody would put their own effort in these objectives, mankind would be very technologically advanced
Stars?? Cant fake stars
Tyree Mitchell what?
@@tyreemitchell5174 I don't get it
@@tyreemitchell5174 That's the point Mitchell. Don't you think if they were faking it they would remember to put the stars in? (You don't really think that they CAN'T fake stars, do you?) --- Put some minimal effort into researching 'photography exposure'. It's a really, really simple factual concept. All you have to do is look it up. --- you can reproduce it with your own cell phone. Go outside at night and look up and see the stars. Now stand next to any remotely lit object like this white Dragon capsule, and take a picture of yourself and see if there are any stars in YOUR picture. There won't be. The camera exposure is designed to pick up the subject in the foreground of the photograph. The subject in the foreground is well-lit enough that the aperture on the camera is only open a short amount of time. And when the aperture on the camera is only open a short amount of time, it's not open long enough to pick up dimly-lit things in the background, like the pinpricks of light that stars are. ---- Of course, that is for 'still' cameras. Video cameras like this one are designed to utilize the correct exposure for the thing in the foreground that it's recording. The video camera's automatic exposure is NOT set for recording the things in the background that are dim.
Not morally though. Thats what we need
.1 meters per second? So you’re telling me my practice of docking kerbals at 15 M/S isn’t right? Oh man Jeb’s Gonna be pissed!
*cough* what did you say?
Its a game kerbals space program
So how many craft have you destroyed just by docking?
Like an old man easing in to a hot bath...
DabbaYabbaDo Disturbing...
Like an old man easing in to a young lady!
So So true!!!
Yeah like an old man slowly
Yup. The Left wrinkly ball always dips in first slowly.
Did anyone have the Han Zimmer score to Interstellar playing in their head when they saw this?
No.
Here 🙌🔥🔥
haha - totally!
Me me me
Blue Danube waltz
Born in 61 and remember as a young child sitting in front of t.v. watching all missions. Fascinating watching this that we can keep progressing in our space ventures. I congratulate elon musk and EVERYONE involved. You are ALL true pioneers .😊
This is one of bad influence produce by tv.brainwashing machine..
@@syamnakmuay89 and you, sitting in your bubble of ignorance?
@@syamnakmuay89 Stop drinking the bleach man.
Keep wishin kid. This is all computer magic
@Josh A They didn't
Its not possible
No. Its necessary
Interstellar 😍
i played No Time For Caution in the background. start it basically right when this video starts, the timing is on point.
Lol dbagggggg
I wanted to comment that
Come on Tars!
Amazing, what a delicate docking. So cool being able to watch this from outer space.
Not to be knit picky, but we're watching this from Earth...- agreed it's an incredible thing to see this happen.✌️
How come are you in the outer space and where do you have your Internet connection from?
Kacper Ogórek you make no sense.
Bs. Still no stars in the background?!
Just dark background!
Whoever is recording the docking can not record the earth and space? BS ALWAYS. Elon you’re bs too now
bcuz u What do you think is gained by faking this?
And all this is happening at 17000 miles per hour!! amazing what humans can achieve!!
"Less than 1/10 of a meter per second" is not 17000 mph
Kyle Pace Hes talks about how both objects are orbiting the earth.
@@CheeseburgerFrags oh, dang
Impressive work from the programmers (mathematicians?) behind the autonomous docking system thrusters.
We are all in a Simulation....
@@abyteuser6297 lololo lololo igjorant
DRACO THRUST
All this innovative engineering Elon made possible blows my mind. It’s the coolest event I’ve seen in my 30 years of living.
Not only the docking is autonomous, but also all the mission is, which includes ascending, orbiting, first engine's landing procedure(reorienting, entry stuff, landing), "of course i still love you"s route, ect.
What an amazing view. A wonderful breakthrough in space transportation
Listening to 'no time for caution' from the movie Interstellar while watching this. Makes it even more epic ;)
Well that was dramatic docking when the whole spacecraft is rotating at 67 rpm
this stuff excites me
You should live in Florida! Where you can SEE IT GO UP!!!! 😀😀😀
( greetings from the West Coast of Florida)
Kathleen R XD oh what I would do to live in Florida . Give me a couple of years and I’ll get enough cash to leave South Africa
@@camtjies_9716 Yeah I took it for granted when I was young. I was a child during the Apollo program. And we could see every launch. FROM OUR HOUSE. I think because I was a child it never occurred to me that everybody couldn't see the launch from their house. And I mean everybody on the planet. -- In my twenties, during the shuttle program, I happen to live in the same town as NASA. And of course I could see the launches from my house then too. But I could also get in my car and drive 10 or 15 minutes and be REALLY close. ---- it was awesome. And I love the space program. And I'm more grateful, now that I'm older, of the childhood I was privileged to have. I didn't realize then how lucky I was.
@@kathleenr4047 Same for me I used to live in the North Pole, and every Christmas Eve I was watching Santa in his sleigh with his Dears Departing to go around the World and bring all those Gifts to the Children who Deserved it. Still so Gratefull for this Unique Privilege. I din't realized that children were sleeping when he was going around, and I was AWAKE to see him Leaving. Justice is not of this World.
@@camtjies_9716 just want to say good luck, many blessings for cash to come your way. Leaving SA isn’t easy.
Impressive technology!!!!!!!!!!!!! Great to see our space program alive again.
Where are the cgi stars?
mike gallimore The main reason why they don't want to spend billions on solving world problems is because all the money is being spent on military/wars which only makes the problems worse.
Truly awesome to see. Been watching since lift off yesterday. Incredible achievement. Great to see the USA launching again from the Cape with their own Spacecraft. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
South African?
Funny to see some adults still believing in Santa.
Great to see the human race achieve. Regardless of nationality!
From Australia 👍👍👍👍
What a stupid nationalistic comment. 🤮
Thank you Spacex
Hello
It is apparent that we are the same 250 people ON THIS PLANET THAT PAY ATTENTION to Exploration.
Thank you.
It kinda hurts, doesn’t it?
You've come a long way baby. Dad took me and my family to watch the first moon launch at cape Canaveral. Now this WOW.
I wish I had that chance: but I did watch the last Delta IV Medium launch so I can’t complain.
I always think of the flower waltz when I see docking. I dont know if its because of stanley kubrick or because the waltz fits so well in a weightlessness
Wow !what a perfect docking Viva Dragon and Brilliant astronauts Godspeed.
Amazing to think both the crew dragon capsule and the ISS are travelling at 17500 mph
The make it like real, huh...
yeah, sure looks like it's moving 5 miles a second.... not.....
@@rafickilewis8185 I mean... They are on a orbit, basically they are falling without reaching the point, basically having an infinite fall, so ofc the speed is high
they can't be falling if there is no up or down in space. space is fake
Imagine the calculations and the physical tools and machines required to make all of that happen. To be able to launch, find the space station, match speeds and then dock as if both bodies appear to be almost motionless. What a fantastic achievement.
Dr Mann i repeat donot attempt dock😅😅😅
Very amazing work!! Just a question. At the last few seconds of the video it shows about 7000 km/s. Should It be km/h ?
It says 7 km/s, not 7000. they use dots for decimal numbers and commas for thousands
Just a quick "Dock and Stop"!
i was on the edge of my seat, that rocket was going so fast!!!
They finally cached up to 1960s technology !
Actually, there were no touch screens, hi-resolution monitors, microprocessors, large capacity memory, no graphic capability. Apollo used relays and switches, some integrated circuity, but sill in its infancy, along with the first suitcased sized computer on the planet, and it all worked just fine. Since then The miniaturization of transistors down to the nanometer has given current technology the ability to use those fancy touch screens and storage and processing capabilities.
@Prom _Ethium They did not need it !
Thanks for the video. I planned on watching the docking at the predicted time of 10:29am Eastern, but they docked about a dozen minutes early, so I missed it.
I was planing on watching it but it was 2 am and I fell asleep watching the stream
Mind blowing! Just like my Tesla driving autonomously!!
Imagine setting up future space stations orbiting different planets in the future that you can transfer between. But idk if its possible to dock an interplanetary spacecraft on a station like that because it would probably be much larger.
just curious, how fast is Dragon and ISS moving in space, they almost look stationary
About 28000 km/h relative to earth. But in what way to you expet to see it here? You have absolute no reference in the background. So it could be also 28 km/h or 2800000000 km/h and would look the same.
What a bummer leaving this modern masterpiece and going into that old tin can masterpiece....
Now musk should launch a fleet of these that would interconnect and create a new cool Touchscreen enabled Sci-Fi style station!
Don't be too exicited by the new delicate touch screen and cosmetic touch of SpaceX. Space is a dangerous place to be and the rigged ISS works well for now.
@@alberthenriette8976 i think you meant to say rugged but got auto corrected to rigged?
I'm not excited about the touch screen itself, more about the simplistic controls.
Besides touch screens are pretty robust and i bet they have redundancy.
I think the excitement of being in space overrules any need for a touch screen 😋
I feel so bad for the people that believe this is fake. Their I.Q. is 20 and are so close minded. When we leave this rock leave them here
When are you leaving?
the crazy thing is that they docked like this in the apollo missions, but manually, while hurtling twoards the moon. INSANE.
There were several dockings and undockings in Apollo - once when the CSM had to turn around and dock with the LM and pull it out of the third stage, then when the LM left for the moon and then the upper stage of the LM separated from the landing stage and returned back from the moon to dock with the CSM. Then when the LM was ditched before departing the moon and finally when the command and service modules were explosively separated just before reentry.
Kind of done all this 50 years ago oh and landed on the sodding moon and returned without any fatalities 5 times!!! This should have been a video of a docking to a MARS space station.
'5 times'?
You sure about that?
Humans have been to the moon and back 9 times....
Unfortunately, politics happened
Certainly not the first automated docking, but it sure was smooth and accurate. All of this automation opens the door to getting more real scientists to the space station and less test pilots.
I don't understand, if someone could explain, if the ISS is orbiting the earth constantly, how come they can slowly move Dragon and manage to dock it to the ISS while it is oribiting???????
It only looks slow because bot objects are flying at relatively the same speed and there is no other object to give a reference for the speed. The ISS circles the earth every 90 minutes at 17,500 mph. If you notice the speed on dragon yesterday during its flight into space, it reached over 22,000 mph.
@@causticchameleon7861 Ohh thanks man! It all makes sense now :)
I think you are pulling our legs. No need to answer you, You already know the answer, playing a little bit of games, OK, got a little thrill down your leg by Chris Matthews now?
Caustic Chameleon and you want me believe they docked in that speed? If the spacecraft has 22000 mikes speed imagine how far up it would go within 15 minutes. I don't buy this CGI space show
morad barfab The fact that you don’t understand what’s going on doesn’t mean it’s fake.
I NEED a version of this with Interstelar docking theme!
Play No Time for Caution in anothrr tab, right at the start of the video. Timing is on point
Joshua Lee shhhh don’t tell them!!! Let the mouseyyy finish the lab test on its own lmao.
Imagine, the speed of them relative to each other looks so slow but relative to earth, the speed is heck fast. Technology really have gone so far. Just hundred years ago we don't even have efficient communication then now we're combining objects in the orbit.
4:02 what are the shadows on the left corner ?
From the ISS
Can someone tell where r the stars plzzzzzzzzzz
No, because this has been explained thousands of times on TH-cam alone. It’s called research
camera thing, I forgot what exactly, but if I remember correctly it has something to do with camera exposure
Imagens maravilhosas! Realmente muito emocionante! Parabéns à NASA E SPACE X! 😍😍😍😍
Amazing
Amazing stuff! 👍🚀
17,000 mph or 2mph which one is it? 😅😅😅🤔🤔🤔
I love how the media plays up the 17,000 mph orbital speed relative to the earth when what really matters is the relative speed between the space station and the space capsule. For the rest of their lives most news reporters will be scratching their heads over this, because you don’t take physics in journalism school, you party and use drugs for four years and then They hand you a token journalism degree, so it happened at my college, the engineer and students were studying, your truly included, and the journalism students were partying like mad.
17k speed around the earth, but 2mph relative to the space station. It’s why you can be doing 90 on the highway but moving only 1mph faster than the car next to you.
@@steveperreira5850 🤣🤣seriously bro.. I can clearly relate with my university too,
The mass communication department is next to our dept 'Biotech', in our first sem one of my classmates left our dept and joined them as he saw them enjoying and
When later when I asked him how it was there , one should have seen his emotions, 🤣🤣🤣
Can you see now that the earth is flat?
Human brain evolving towards space living ! Congrats! To Nasa and ISS , soacex , usa bob and doug
So is this goodbye Soyuz/Baikonur?
Have you seen Any UFO's out there on your journey?
There were actually two on the launch video. You can find the time stamps in the comments.
Can someone edit it with Interstellar movie BGM?
YES PLEASE
I assume you mean music. --- real space flight doesn't need background music. And the reason I know this is, there's a great shuttle launch video online where the guy added background music. And the most common complaint is that the music is annoying it distracts from the awesomeness of the video. And he even comments at one point and agrees that he's going take out the music and repost the video. ---. I'll send you a link if you're interested.
I've first hand seen the ISS with my naked eye - defo a humbling sight as it wizzes overhead, leaving a trail of light as it passes
If you had a ham radio you could contact it
@@HomebrandFishfood 👍 That is true, you CAN contact the International Space Station with a ham radio. But BE AWARE! IF you contact the ISS with a ham radio, it will STILL not leave a trail of light. --- just sayin'
Look at all the stars!!! 19 hrs going 17,000 mph right?
That's exactly right. Do you have any other questions?
How much light does your camera need to see by? Fancy cameras can adjust sensitivity by opening and closing the aperture that lets in the light. Human eyes do the same thing, automatically, all the time, by dilating and contracting their pupils. If you're a sighted person walking from a brightly lit to a dark outdoor area, you won't see stars in the sky either, at least not right away. As your eyes dial up their sensitivity by opening up your pupils, you slowly notice fainter and fainter stars.
Most space cameras actually can't adjust their aperture in this way. Instead, scientists predict the light levels that a camera will encounter through its mission, and design their instruments to have an aperture that's an appropriate size for the range of targets they expect to encounter. This can be a challenge if your spacecraft will encounter a wide range of target brightnesses, but you make your camera to work on the intended science targets and don't worry if it isn't ideal for any fun extras you may photograph along the way.
From a quick search...questions?
Stop looking for fallacies. This is actually happening.
bblw1307 Thanks for explaining it to them. Then need to learn.
Absolutely incredible, that being said... the Dragon had a nose/cone camera, would have been nice to watch from that head on angle as it connected with the ISS. Houston were tuned into that camera when Chris was organizing the hatch to be opened, he even waved into it. Curious why they wouldn't show that camera on the above video.
because it is all CGI
@@bretton_woods Proof?
Well yeah someone should have played NO TIME FOR CAUTION at the time of docking.......... Would be pretty sick !!
seen it all be for with apollo and the moon landings, they had to do it manually
Me TOO!
Apollo had a flight computer which did most of the flying. Pilots could take over manually if needed, just like today.
@@Heat3YT2 is correct.
Stars anyone??? Thought this was space. And what camera do they use to make 17,000mph look like 2mph??
The sun is bouncing off the space ship and blinding the camera to any other lights in space. As for the speed, the objects are flying at relatively the same speed and there is no other object in sight to get a comparison so it only looks slow. Think of it like you and a friend sitting in a cars traveling beside each other at 55 mph. You reach out to each other slowly to pass something. Now imagine it with now wind resistance and in an almost completely dark tunnel and another friend is filming it. The pass off would look slow as there is nothing externally that is stationary in the frame to actually show the speed at which you are traveling.
You are a provocateur, you can’t possibly be this stupid, you should get back to your college homework. ..... oh I forgot, no college, fake pandemic closes Colleges, and they will give you a fake degree anyway. Everyone of you snowflakes gets a fake degree. That’s the real fake stuff you pigeon brain.
I cant believe that in this age of information at our fingertips, such stupid questions are being asked.
If you want to see space, check between your ears.....
@@steveperreira5850 Okay, boomer.
Totally amazing
Tell me when this dogging complete
Honest question. How come we can't see any stars? We can see them from earth at night but not here. Is it being washed out from all the light being reflected from the earth?
They're too faint in relation to the light reflected off the ISS/Dragon to be picked up. The camera adjusts it's sensitivity to light to ensure the object in focus is not too dim nor too bright and washed out. If the camera adjusted to capture the stars, the ISS/Dragon would just be bright white glaring objects in the image. Same reason that when you take a photo of a person in front of a sunset, you get a silhouette and no details of their face.
Dustin Murray --- Sam Horton is correct.--- They are not washed out because of the light reflected by the Earth. The stars are being washed out because the camera is designed for the correct exposure for the thing in the foreground. Which is the Dragon capsule. It's automatically set for the right exposure to film The Dragon capsule in the foreground and that exposure is not enough to pick up the dim stars, way in the background.
การเข้าจอดใช้ระบบดึงเข้าหาโดยใช้สายสลิงได้ไหม คือปล่อยสายสลิงจากสถานีอวกาศไปเกี่ยวกับตัวยานแล้วดึงเข้าหากัน มันจะปรอดภัยและเร็วขึ้นไหม
Loved it!!!!! 👍👍👍👍
Can someone explain we can easily see plenty of stars from earth at night however pitch black for the Falcon 9 Dragon docking to Iss surely be some stars 400kms up. 🤔🤔
The focus and light exposure of the camera doesnt show the stars.
You can try this yourself. Take a photo of a fully lit building during the night with the sky as a background. Result will only show the building with no stars.
Why do so many people not know this?
Wow just like 2001 a Space Odyssey!?
1. How does the crew Dragon know where the station is?
2. Who's filming?
I kind of know answers to both of these questions but I'm not sure so that's why I'm asking
1. I believe theyre being guided by ground control (?) And monitors inside the dragon.
2. ISS cameras were filming.
The dragon capsule is fully autonomous so its flight computers do everything from catching up to the station to the entire docking process, and they are using remotely operated cameras on the outside of the station
Obra perfeita, gostei de ver
Thanks for sharing. I had the opporunity to witness a rocket launch in 2018. Memorable experience. I uploaded a pretty solid clip of the experience on my channel.
I have a question, in the background, there should be stars right? Or at least some other form of lighting in the background?
Do you know much about camera exposure settings when shooting in bright light conditions?
Stupid question!
Thousands of times, literally this has been explained on TH-cam alone
This is the outset of the 21st century era of space journeys, congratulations Elon, u proved what a brilliant mind can do. 😍😍😊
Brilliant minds* he didn’t do this alone 😋
@@EllieDaisy Thank you for pointing it out. its correct. :)
Outstanding 👍👏👏👏🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 God bless America 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸👏👏👏
Meanwhile riots
@@HappyGhetto It's always something. If it's not one thing it's another. . . . Roseanne Roseannadanna.
wheres the mouse?
Good one! Where is the mouse? LOL! Excellent! 🤣🤣🤣
Weightlessness is achieved by flying G-FORCE ONE through a parabolic flight maneuver. Specially trained pilots fly these maneuvers between approximately 24,000 and 34,000 feet altitude. ... Next the plane is "pushed over" the top to begin the zero-gravity segment of the parabola
Just because you don't understand orbital mechanics, it doesn't mean it's fake. You honestly have no no clue how ignorant and idiotic y'all sound, do you? I was going to say, "child-like", but then I remembered that children have the capacity to assimilate new information and make logical sense of it; something you Flat Earthers seem to have somehow lost along the way. Tell me, was it blunt force trauma? Stroke? Oxygen deprivation, perhaps? Edit: Somehow managed to misspell 'something' as 'comething'. Fixed.
Does anybody know what happens to the capsule once it's on there?
It will keep parked there until these two astronauts go back to earth in a few months in it.
*Stupid Question*
Does the capsule move both forward and sideways to match with the speed and rotation of the ISS while docking ?
it all looks stationary in this video .
We are all lucky to witness the very first flight of a new era of commercial space travel into earth lower orbit. All of that thanks to a visionary man called Elon Musk. Soon travelling to the Moon will become a simple commodity
Congratulations Bobby and Doug,,,, I believe,,this,,,,,really......(from Santo André- Sao Paulo- Brazil)
@monika laosi The only thing not actually occurring is your brain function.....
monika laosi You're the one who needs to wake up as you are still believing it's fake.
let me one think ,when dragon connecting with ISS ,ISS moving stoped? coz ISS moving speed 7.6 km/s
The capsule also moves with 7.6 km/h. Everything in orbit moves with that speed. It is the purpose of a rocket to accelerate things up to that speed, because that is the necessary speed so that they stay in orbit and not fall down. It would be a bad a idea to stop the ISS, because then the capsoule would slam into the ISS with 7.6 km/s :-) And the ISS would fall straight down to earth if it doesn't move anymore.
Why don't they ever show video as it's approaching from a distance? That would be awesome to see.
Where would the camera have to be? The best shot would be from far away. Probably not connected to the Space Station at all. How would that be possible? A remote satellite that travels with the Space Station but is not physically connected to it? Seems like that would be very difficult to achieve for a long time. Perhaps something like that could be launched from the space station and then retrieved periodically. But at what cost and what benefit compared to the cost? Probably better things to spend $$ on.
Because its in a studio or an hanger
How do you know your just guessing so you can justify the fantasy your living
So there was only 3 on board space station before spacex arrived
My God.... It's full of stars...
i thought the i.s.s was orbiting the earth at a speed of 10,000 mph or some thing?
is it becuase its out of the atmosphere?
@@ethancurtin7486 the ISS is moving relative to the earth at 18,000 mph, but here we are seeing both ships moving at the same speed and without any reference points there seems to be no movement
such a crazy advancement for space! Thanks Elon very cool...
What do you mean? It's all been done before.
joeskis my thoughts exactly! Why is everyone getting so excited. What’s different
joeskis for someone like elon he should be proud for what he is doing because no matter if it’s been done before it’s still a step towards going further through space
@@TheGameCamer360 A rocket booster that is able to launch and land back safely to be re-used whilst delivering humans to space.... no its not been done before.
@@joeskis Reusable boosters that land themselves? No, not done before.
The camera man can hold his breath for ages jeez
The United States - we needed something good to happen these days...
Cgi is good? Cause I haven't seen 1 star since the launch but I'm sure Nasa has an answer lmao
It is great to see the good news here and we can give credit to private enterprise, and even to President Barack Obama, because he canceled the ridiculously over cost NASA program to bring astronauts to the space station, and furthermore, Obama made it a private competition. Rather surprising for a guy who is pretty much a socialist, I mean Obama here, but I consider it one of the very few real accomplishments of his eight year administration.
@@tyreemitchell5174 you never see stars on cameras. They are too dim for most camera sensors to pick up, if you boosted up the brightness enough to see stars the main object on view (spacecraft) would be overwhelmingly bright.
@@tyreemitchell5174 That's because you haven't got a clue. Because it's beyond your limitations you sneer at it. Quite a normal reaction from someone with a hillbilly IQ.
Tyree Mitchell Ahh, you think it's fake - well, if people get some hope and joy from it, mission accomplish regardless! Right? Can I get an "AMEN!?"
WOW! That was cool. Did msm cover this great American accomplishment?
Yes. Yes they did. --- America says, "You're welcome."
The Space Station is supposed to be moving at 17,150 miles per hour or 4.78 per second, how come we see it as it is not moving...
That’s how long my misses takes to back into a car space
Love Muss B --- If your
Missus does this with the car, I hope you are appreciative and grateful. You realize what the alternative is, right? Do you want her to do it fast? Or do you want her to do it collision-free? --- You're not realizing the slow-parking gift you've been given.
I knew there was gonna be interstellar comments here 😂 it’s a good thing really 😂
Soooo cool! Thanks for this.
I worry about COVID... I would think that they have done everything to ensure that the Dragon capsule and 'em astronauts are COVID-free...
They wouldn’t send ill astronauts to space.
They have to quarantine
Great work team endeavour
Yes,amazing.And where Is stars?
Do you know much about camera exposure settings when shooting in bright light conditions?
They should make the docking of 2 ships in Stat Wars more realistic
So easy to forget that these orbiters are flying at 17 thousand mph. You could reach out and shove it away like a boat on the water.
8:00pm state panjab (india)dekha gya31-05-20👌👌
Sounds like an X game competition
You wouldn't believe it was attempting to dock at a speed of 17,500 mph... Would you?
The speed relative to the ISS is nearly zero....
The relative velocity between the capsule and the ISS is virtually zero...
loved it !!!
amazing
Where are all the star's?
Nikki Taylor if you ever seen a video debunking the moon landing conspiracies, the stars are not in the photo because the camera needs time to capture that light.
It’s because the camera isn’t set to see the stars, if it wanted to see the stars it’d have to capture more light and the crew dragon would be over saturated, the point is seeing the crew dragon, not the stars.