Get the EF/RF adaptor with the control ring, then you get that control ring with your EF lenses as well, I use mine for ISO. Got all EF L mk2 or mk3 lenses with my R6. They still blow my mind after shooting with them for a year.
I bought one with the control ring and never found a use for it. It's just redundant. My opinion. It does nothing that controls on the camera don't already do, and you pay an extra hundred bucks for the priviledge. I recommend a basic adapter for 99.00.
@@alansach8437 Honestly, I thought the same when I first got it. The non-control ring version was sold out when I got my R6. However, a year on and after trying out different customisations to suit my shooting styles I have it set to change the ISO. I have the ISO set to auto when I shoot manual but sometimes I want the ISO fixed as well so I can quickly do that with my left hand as its supporting the lens and camera, which means my right hand can still be on the back button focus and shutter button.
I constantly admire how well these shorts are made. I'd love a behind the scenes of how you film, edit and script these videos. They're a work of art 👏🏻
Rule of thumb when there is a direct RF remplacement of a lens: The RF lens is a touch sharper and lighter than the EF version If you already own the EF version, dont bother with the RF one. If you dont own that either, go RF.
For some years editing both RF & EF compared, if u really hate CA and prefer much cleaner image, go for RF Modern lenses are better in almost every way.
Absolutely... I used to think EF glass cant get any sharper or "better" but the newer RF glass is just on another level... Incredible sharpness from corner to corner, fast autofocus, lightweight - the list goes on
@@GuitarmasterSK agreed, once u get the feel of newer lenses. U can't never go back, always keep recommending other to get RF instead of EF. Even 'L' EF lenses now get beaten easily with 3rd party lenses (compared to E-mount 3rd party ) at much2 cheaper price
Yep, I typically have just adapted Sony (Minolta) A Mount lenses to an E Mount camera body. So far, what I found was that the older lenses had unique artistic value over the modern counterpart with only a minor dip in performance. But the modern counterparts definitely have better lens coating, superior auto focus, and usually much lighter in weight.
Anthony …. Thanks for this video I am doing this from two months Buying ef lenses and that too used But i wanted people to know about this option with explanation
my rf 50 1.8 was struggling through a whole 4 mins to find my face ... on an R6 II.. switched to a ef 20 mm usm and it stuck from start to finish, same settings and all. RF autofocus on the STMs sucks real bad.
Left canon for Fuji, these lenses are too expensive, too big and look ridiculous on their ugly looking mirrorless camera. Fuji seems to have built their line around enthusiasts while canon seems to have diverted entirely on only trying to cater to “professionals.” Canon’s line up lacks the fun factor for a more technical approach which is a shame
Great camera for starting and traveling. It's small and good enough. Just get the trinity of sigma prime lenses (16mm, 30mm and 56mm) and you will cover most focal lengths and they are all F1.4
I have the M6 mark 2, the bigger brother from the m50 mk2 They are great cameras, only issue is that they are M mount, but you can still get an EF adapter
?? Are we talking third party EF mount lenses here? All Canon EF lenses will function on an RF body the same or better than they did on an EF body using any of Canon's 3 EF-RF adapters. This includes full aperture, autofocus and stabilization functions. Some EF lenses do not allow for full coordinated stabilization between the lens and sensor stabilization systems. I believe the image circle was not designed to be large enough for the sensor to shift, or it may have to do with a lack of precise feedback on older IS lenses. Either way, the lens stabilization will still function as it would on a 1DX mkiii, a Rebel t1 or any other Canon DSLR.
Get the EF/RF adaptor with the control ring, then you get that control ring with your EF lenses as well, I use mine for ISO. Got all EF L mk2 or mk3 lenses with my R6. They still blow my mind after shooting with them for a year.
Thanks for the tip 👍
I bought one with the control ring and never found a use for it. It's just redundant. My opinion. It does nothing that controls on the camera don't already do, and you pay an extra hundred bucks for the priviledge. I recommend a basic adapter for 99.00.
@@alansach8437 Honestly, I thought the same when I first got it. The non-control ring version was sold out when I got my R6. However, a year on and after trying out different customisations to suit my shooting styles I have it set to change the ISO. I have the ISO set to auto when I shoot manual but sometimes I want the ISO fixed as well so I can quickly do that with my left hand as its supporting the lens and camera, which means my right hand can still be on the back button focus and shutter button.
@@GregShawThe R6 has three dials, so there is no point of having the ISO on a control ring instead of the dial.
@@petrpohnan875 Not if they are being used to control other features 😉
I constantly admire how well these shorts are made. I'd love a behind the scenes of how you film, edit and script these videos. They're a work of art 👏🏻
Agreed 💯
Yes!
Also might be worth pointing out some of those upgraded features like noticeably better stabilization and lighter or more compact lenses in many cases
Rule of thumb when there is a direct RF remplacement of a lens:
The RF lens is a touch sharper and lighter than the EF version
If you already own the EF version, dont bother with the RF one.
If you dont own that either, go RF.
For some years editing both RF & EF compared, if u really hate CA and prefer much cleaner image, go for RF
Modern lenses are better in almost every way.
Absolutely... I used to think EF glass cant get any sharper or "better" but the newer RF glass is just on another level... Incredible sharpness from corner to corner, fast autofocus, lightweight - the list goes on
@@GuitarmasterSK agreed, once u get the feel of newer lenses. U can't never go back, always keep recommending other to get RF instead of EF. Even 'L' EF lenses now get beaten easily with 3rd party lenses (compared to E-mount 3rd party ) at much2 cheaper price
It's as if nobody took a decent picture before mirrorless.
You should make a video of trying film photography
I wondered what the difference was, it was the next thing to look up. Thank you for the information, it's very well presented 👍
Yep, I typically have just adapted Sony (Minolta) A Mount lenses to an E Mount camera body. So far, what I found was that the older lenses had unique artistic value over the modern counterpart with only a minor dip in performance.
But the modern counterparts definitely have better lens coating, superior auto focus, and usually much lighter in weight.
Anthony …. Thanks for this video
I am doing this from two months
Buying ef lenses and that too used
But i wanted people to know about this option with explanation
ILY Anthony
Is it called upgrade?
I have an ef 24-105 f4 and it works great with an adaptor
What about efs
I’m curious how an 85 would do. Cuz I hear the new RF 85 is supreme to the EF version
I used the Ef lenses with an adapter and rf lenses and the image is not the same the ef lenses don’t look as good in my opinion
my rf 50 1.8 was struggling through a whole 4 mins to find my face ... on an R6 II.. switched to a ef 20 mm usm and it stuck from start to finish, same settings and all. RF autofocus on the STMs sucks real bad.
*minimum focus distance has entered the chat*
So I just bought a Nikon z50. If I want to use older lenses, do I buy the FTZ adapter?
Yes, I do this on my z5 and z6ii. Just check the compatibility list on the ftz adapter. Some older lenses won't auto focus with the ftz
What do you tbink about the EOS R50
Are testing the mininmun focus is changing or not? Because when i use ef on rf camera it feel less sharp
Mirrorless AF faster, crying in Fuji x mount firmware 4 upgrade bugs which made AF slower than before 😢😢
EF wideangle wises are not very good, as they have a retrofocus design.
Plenty EF lenses on the secondhand market.
Can you please take the time to include captions on your videos?
I have used EOS R camera with a EF Lena and the adapter had a control ring which was really good and useful feature, so it’s not very valid reason.
Does the autofocus works good for street photography?
500-1000? RF is stupid expensive
Can you recommend that can still make good photos, even with a low budget?
Used Canon 5d. It uses EF lenses. Closest to looking like your pictures were shot on kodacrome.
Just spent $4500 for Sony A74 and 20mm lens. My God camera gear is so expensive! I’ll probably need 1500$ more to complete the other needs😅
“High quality prices”
Left canon for Fuji, these lenses are too expensive, too big and look ridiculous on their ugly looking mirrorless camera. Fuji seems to have built their line around enthusiasts while canon seems to have diverted entirely on only trying to cater to “professionals.” Canon’s line up lacks the fun factor for a more technical approach which is a shame
Nikon z 50
What do you think about the canon M50 mark ii
Great camera for starting and traveling. It's small and good enough. Just get the trinity of sigma prime lenses (16mm, 30mm and 56mm) and you will cover most focal lengths and they are all F1.4
I have the M6 mark 2, the bigger brother from the m50 mk2
They are great cameras, only issue is that they are M mount, but you can still get an EF adapter
Dont get Canon then. Sigma makes awesome glass and theyre locked out Of the RF mount
Don't do this. Some will not be compatible with stabilization features for the lens.
?? Are we talking third party EF mount lenses here? All Canon EF lenses will function on an RF body the same or better than they did on an EF body using any of Canon's 3 EF-RF adapters. This includes full aperture, autofocus and stabilization functions. Some EF lenses do not allow for full coordinated stabilization between the lens and sensor stabilization systems. I believe the image circle was not designed to be large enough for the sensor to shift, or it may have to do with a lack of precise feedback on older IS lenses. Either way, the lens stabilization will still function as it would on a 1DX mkiii, a Rebel t1 or any other Canon DSLR.
Adapters shoot 1 in 5 pics in focus, they are rubbish.
Canon lenses in particular are super expensive. That's why canon sucks ass.
Too bad…. Gotta spend it to make it
Or don't buy canon and buy sony instead because Canon lens are expensive 😅